http://nhfreedom.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/according-to-concord-nh-free-staters-commit-daily-terrorism-acts/
http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/29/concord-nh-cops-want-armored-swat-vehicl
Good comments from the reason crowd.
Kudos to the Concord tards for their recruitment efforts. ;D
http://www.concordmonitor.com/opinion/7909077-95/letter-insulting
yea Sandy :)
Quote from: Russell Kanning on August 02, 2013, 08:50 PM NHFT
http://www.concordmonitor.com/opinion/7909077-95/letter-insulting
yea Sandy :)
Indeed well done.
Another opinion generated by this.
http://connect.freedomworks.org/node/166604/discussions/1247740
Deja vu?
Hermann Goering's Quote
On War And The People
3-20-2
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY."
--Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
If the relatively-small presence of Freestaters in Concord results in the need for an APC...
...then what should be necessary in Grafton, with the highest concentration of Freestaters?
A few main battle tanks and a missile battery?
Quote from: MaineShark on August 03, 2013, 11:36 AM NHFT
If the relatively-small presence of Freestaters in Concord results in the need for an APC...
...then what should be necessary in Grafton, with the highest concentration of Freestaters?
A few main battle tanks and a missile battery?
The "protection" is for the politicians. There isn't any politicians worth protecting in Grafton.
Quote from: Jim Johnson on August 03, 2013, 12:31 PM NHFTThere isn't any politicians worth protecting in Grafton.
Do you think that Concord is any different, in that regard? :o ;D
Grafton might need nuclear warships.
In Kilton pond?
Quote from: Kat Kanning on August 03, 2013, 10:17 PM NHFT
Grafton might need nuclear warships.
Quote from: Pat K on August 03, 2013, 11:56 PM NHFT
In Kilton pond?
The upper decks could be the casinos and the lower decks would be the retirement community.
Safety, security and a proven income.
Quote from: Pat K on August 03, 2013, 11:56 PM NHFT
In Kilton pond?
Nooo!! They might disturb Graffy the Peaceful Plesiosaur!
Quote from: Free libertarian on August 04, 2013, 06:14 AM NHFT
Quote from: Pat K on August 03, 2013, 11:56 PM NHFT
In Kilton pond?
Nooo!! They might disturb Graffy the Peaceful Plesiosaur!
In theory, Graffy would benefit from the warm water output of the nuclear reactor.
In Grafton we don't need no stinking nuclear reactor. When we want to warm the swimmin' hole we do it the old fashioned way...we pee in the water!
Quote from: Free libertarian on August 04, 2013, 04:46 PM NHFT
In Grafton we don't need no stinking nuclear reactor. When we want to warm the swimmin' hole we do it the old fashioned way...we pee in the water!
Well, I am glad this thread found it's way back to some sort of terrorism.
;D you folk are fun.
Folks in Grafton are such naturalists.
Quote from: Jim Johnson on August 04, 2013, 05:50 PM NHFT
Quote from: Free libertarian on August 04, 2013, 04:46 PM NHFT
In Grafton we don't need no stinking nuclear reactor. When we want to warm the swimmin' hole we do it the old fashioned way...we pee in the water!
Well, I am glad this thread found it's way back to some sort of terrorism.
just what I was thinking
Enviro turrism and poisoning the well