New Hampshire Underground

New Hampshire Underground => General Discussion => Topic started by: Christopher King on August 08, 2007, 07:14 AM NHFT

Title: Meeting with Franconia lawyer reveals more lies from NH AG Ayotte.
Post by: Christopher King on August 08, 2007, 07:14 AM NHFT
Breaking News:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/kingcast-meets-with-franconia-counsel.html

30 November 2007
KingCast meets with Franconia Counsel Mullen and finds more complaints on McKay, including a lie by the NH AG's office and violations of force policy

Okay. Here's a complaint letter to the NH AG's office from the McKay knifing victim, "Ms. B." The problem is, here is an RSA 91-A reponse dated 1 August, 2007 in which Defendant Ayotte writes "the only complaint in our possession is the one referenced in your paragraph seven request above" (the Tim Stephenson complaint). Oopsie-Daisy. Ms. B writes: "[Montminy] refused to answer my concerns about Officer Bruce McKay and told me that I could not prove that he committed perjury.... I am now concerned about the abilities and integrity of both Chief Montminy and Officer McKay.... The Chief told me that my report was "under investigation," yet the only neutral witness was never questioned... I am requesting that the state investigate Officer McKay so that this abuse will no longer be allowed. Thank you for your consideration."

And I found another complaint, written 19 June 2005 -- well after the town said they received its last complaint from 2000 -- from some folks who missed a wrong-way sign on a rainy day all filed written complaints against McKay that echo Liko Kenney's concern that McKay never told him his name: "Finally, when asked he refused to give his supervisor's name, saying with hostility that he would not stand in the rain to tell me." They couldn't believe his lack of decorum in front of a 3 year-old: "We felt as if we wre being treated like felons.... we were shocked...... we hope she is learning to respect those who take an oath to serve & protect the public (even in the rain)."

....and there's more:

In this 26 July 2007 post I linked a Concord Monitor story of 26 July 2007 which noted that McKay's use of OC Spray and the Toyota-ramming Tahoe were inappropriate. My review of the actual policies that I will be receiving and scanning next week supports what I wrote in the post linked in this paragraph but I will note that the use of vehicular force was not warranted because McKay had no right to use deadly force pursuant to RSA 627:5 when he bashed Liko's Toyota, and further as I have said repeatedly, you cannot engage in chemical warfare with someone without a command or directive:

Use of Chemical Agents
II. Nondeadly
C (5) In all situations involving use of chemical agents, suspects should be given adequate warning of their imminent use and should be afforded time to respond to lawful commands.


Bruce violated ALL OF THAT just before he died, because he hated Liko Kenney and fancied himself John Wayne, pure and simple. His track record clearly shows as much.

...and there's more than that, too, at the link.

Breaking News:

Set for 14 December 2007.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/kingcast-says-defendant-ayotte-looks.html

22 November 2007

KingCast says Defendant Ayotte looks enthused about receiving her 2007 First Amendment/RSA 91-A Christmas present: A Notice of Deposition.

I will bear no compunction to videotape it and air it on YouTube. If she's confident in her investigation and confident in her knowledge of the law and of her actions, she should voice no objection.


**********

Hi guys, I saw on another board that KBCraig is from Texas (I lived in Dallas for a while) and that he too, like all other non-media Americans, was subjected to the story set forth by NH AG Kelly Ayotte about Liko Kenney and why he shot Bruce McKay and the "Good Samaritan Marine" who shot Liko.

All of that is false and there will be substantial litigation in short order.

How do I know this?

Because I have the full media kit. The litigation from my end will be a Right-to-Know action to make the State put all of their investigative files online (I may be able to host them later today myself but the public has a Right to Know this because there are so many contradictions) and to get Bruce McKay's personnel file because the government has lied about the number and recency of complaints (i.e. "none after 2000") against him.

How do I know this?

Because one such complaint is actually in the AG's PDF files from Tim Stephenson (2004), and area Attorney Troy Watts told me about another one involving -- you guessed it -- unlawful use of force and pepper spray to a 100lb. girl who passed out and had to be taken away (2005 I believe). And there's video, too. Troy told me so.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-demands-copy-of-police-video.html
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/06/kingcast-watches-truth-come-out-about.html

And didja' know that Liko's 2003 arrest in Fox Hill Park that the AG Trumpeted was Unconstitutional, just as Liko said? It was.

How do I know this?

Because I went to the Courthouse and retrieved the relevant documents, GRANTED Motions to Suppress:


State v. Nathan Wright 03-CR-109

State v. William Miller 03-CR-012, 013, 029

State v. Kenney 03-CR-197

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-watches-as-concerned-faces-ask.html
http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-presents-res-ipsa-vi-fox-hill.html

There were several cases at the time and they all were found Unconstitutional by Judge Cyr. I spoke to Attorney Brooks about it directly; he is now in the Public Defender Appellate branch in Concord. The cops withdrew Liko's underlying possession charges but he was forced into accepting a plea he never wanted to accept for the obstruction and assault on an officer.

In the 2003 video he is agitated, yes, but CORRECT.

And in a day or so we're going to post THE REST OF THE VIDEO that I have from the official media kit that continues from the back of the squad car, where Liko gives Bruce McKay a Fourth Amendment lesson extraordinaire.

Here's what he says:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-says-liko-kenney-gave-bruce.html

21:04:01 - "You can't pull people off the street and put them in handcuffs and drive them around for no reason." [held: correct, as noted by Judge Cyr].

21:05:46 - "I was sitting in my car resting before driving home and now you've done this to me for no reason." [held: correct, as noted by Judge Cyr].

21:15:00 - "Why am I in handcuffs?" "[Officer Cox or Ball] Because you resisted arrest." "Why was I being arrested, why?" "[Officer Cox or Ball] I don't understand what the original offense was." "That's because there is no original offense." [held: correct, as noted by Judge Cyr].

21:15:30 - "He punched me in the face and you and him both saw him punch me in the face and you both are saying he didn't. I'm being beat up IN HANDCUFFS by 3 adult armed men who all have guns and I have NOTHING." [held: correct, by common sense].

21:11:20
"You're resisting arrest."
"I'm resisting torture. You punched me in the face you hurt my injured neck you hurt both of my arms you hurt both of my legs all because I asked you a question."
"You grabbed my testicles, correct?"
"I grabbed your testicles, hell no.
"[McKay laughs, does not say 'yes you did.']"
"You threw me to the ground and put your testicles in my face you fucking faggot."

************

And for the 2007 meltdown take a look at this post and listen to Caleb describe it:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-asks-everyone-to-reflect-on.html

And if you want some more background on that "Hero" who claimed to be a Viet Nam Veteran (he's only 49 guys and I have it in the official files that he claimed to Sam Stephenson that he did 3 tours in 'Nam) think about the fact that his son said that Liko did NOT hit McKay with the Supra until AFTER his father shot at the car.

There is a bullet hole through the windshield

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-vows-to-give-nh-ag-kelly.html

BTW that Kelly only mentions quickly in her BS official report online.

http://doj.nh.gov/publications/nreleases/062507.html

Read up on the Ayotte/Floyd love fest, including the full, heretofore unpublished Search Warrant by Easton Chief Robert Every, right here and get an actual picture of Shooter Floyd:


http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/res-ipsa-x-chief-everys-search-warrant.html

More I cannot say at this time but I'll be back. Kelly Ayotte might not be. Here is a running list of important facts to which I am privy but the general public is not.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-says-hey-kelly-heres-your-hero.html

At least until I file my Motion for Declaratory Judgment.

For now here's how the Motion for Declaratory Judgment starts:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-presents-motion-practice-601-1.html

*****************

Watch Floyd lie right here:


I. Floyd as having spoken with Liko or Caleb, as claimed in the curiously unsigned yet official report at p. 7:


"He told the driver to stop. He said to the driver "Stop." Put it down or you're gonna die;" and "Leave it alone you know you want to live." He told the driver whatever came into his mind.....

....and here's another Floyd Statement:

Pp. 867-868 of the PDF file.
A: "[T]his guy's trying to load and this guy's all mixed up or whatever so I kinda lean my elbow into his adam's apple and just shoot the other guy."
Q: "So you actually put the gun inside the window I mean is the window open?
A: "Oh yah the window was open."
Q: "Now I just want to clarify were you actually touching the passenger?"
A: "Yah... I was trying to stretch my hand in there and make sure [Caleb] stayed back."

Now let's get to the statements from Floyd himself and the other two witnesses -- which are definitely NOT consistent with that:

First there is the bullet through Liko's windshield "on bottom edge close to center." per p. 587 that was "recovered," obviously from somewhere inside the car; I have asked Attorney Strelzin from where and am awaiting his reply.

Now here comes Floyd:

Page 20/1,000:
"Did you say anything before you fired?"
"No, I didn't"

Now here comes Caleb:

Page 11 of official report: "
The man said nothing before he fired."

Now here comes Junior Floyd:

[Floyd Junior also as noted on 91-A pdf page 745]
"They had stopped in front of his arm the first time. They didn't actually hit the officer. Then they backed up to here and at that time my dad got out and tried to pull him to prevent him from running him over again" [KingCast says wait a minute: Run him over again??? There was absolutely nothing to keep Liko from running McKay over the first time -- but he didn't. Liko was just trying to get the hell out of there.] They backed up to here and the car went rushing forward and my dad shot at the driver and it hit him and made him stop. The front end of the car ended up over the officer's chest."

Doesn't sound like there's much time for dialogue there, does it? Also at another point in the bowels of his testimony, I remember reading that Floyd claimed Liko actually ran into McKay twice, striking him the first time while he was standing, which Junior AND Caleb both dispute, point blank. Small wonder I have to compel production of this material in Mandamus but that's what the Right-to-Know is all about, isn't it? That's why Kelly dodged John P's Right to Know request but I asked for a copy of their response because that's also a public record.

Held: As such, there was no discourse at all with first shot, so let's get on to Caleb and the second shot:

II. The second shot through Caleb Macaulay's open or closed window.


Petitioner restates all previous allegations as incorporated herein:

Caleb:

Page 672: "No, no, it was just - it was just pepper spray right away."

Page 700: "When I saw that gun I went down like this and that's all I saw and if I did not do that I wouldn't be, I wouldn't be here today."

Page 701: "He did, did he say anything?" "He said nothing. He started shooting." (Of course later in the interview Caleb is picking glass shards out of his scalp.

And of course, watch the video. Caleb's window is CLEARLY up, and the official report clearly notes at p. 26
"The passenger side widow was in the fully up position but the glass was in fragments."

In fact you can clearly see Caleb's window up at 19:15:37 as the Tahoe ramming starts, you then see both of Liko's hands in the air in a classic "Stop it, WTF????" gesture and Caleb's window is still clearly up as they roll out of view at 19:16:32.

If the window is closed Floyd and Liko aren't having much of a conversation then, are they? No, in fact Liko might have already been mortally wounded from the front shot, causing his car to careen into McKay where his scrotal sack was eviscerated.

Held: Floyd shot the window out without saying a word and Caleb ducked to avoid the shot.
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time
Post by: KBCraig on August 08, 2007, 05:03 PM NHFT
Quote from: Christopher King on August 08, 2007, 07:14 AM NHFT
Hi guys, I saw on another board that KBCraig is from Texas (I lived in Dallas for a while) and that he too, like many Americans, bought the story set forth by NH AG Kelly Ayotte about Liko Kenney and why he shot Bruce McKay and the "Good Samaritan Marine" who shot Liko.

Uhhh... you need to re-read everything I had to say about the incident. I called "BS" on them declaring Floyd in the clear before the blood had dried.

Thanks for the transcripts and info, though. Haven't seen you here on the Underground in a while.
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time
Post by: Dave Ridley on August 08, 2007, 06:41 PM NHFT
welcome back to the underground chistopher!  when u going to come meet us?    we have a lot of get together events on the calendar.
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time
Post by: d_goddard on August 08, 2007, 07:14 PM NHFT
Awesome work, Christopher.
Please post as events unfold. I will be especially interested to follow any suit you bring forward against the State, or agents of the State (such as the AG)
Title: KBC my bad, totally. Also I have the investigative files online here.
Post by: Christopher King on August 08, 2007, 07:40 PM NHFT
KBCraig I was reading too fast because I was at the library at closing time and heading back to work, then couldn't find the forum again.

I will correct it.

Also, here are the "investigative" files.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/saabnet-helps-kingcast-host-franconia.html

Good to be back. I knew our paths would cross again :)
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time.
Post by: Fluff and Stuff on August 08, 2007, 10:02 PM NHFT
I saw the NH TV news reports and it looked the people in NH think both parties were wrong (well, all three).  That is how the news reports looked to me.  And, just taking a guess here, it sure looks like they were all wrong.
Title: Who was wrong or right.....
Post by: Christopher King on August 08, 2007, 11:52 PM NHFT
Yes, that is a veddy deeeep issue.

Because at bottom, the person who was the most right, was Liko.

To deconstruct the government's "case" you have to go back to destroy their strength -- their ace in the hole -- which was the 2003 video. And Liko was right about the lack of probable cause.

Anyway,

I just at random met two yoots (Lucas and Connor) who knew Liko. Funny thing is, I met them at a Nashua gas station as I climbed out of a recent model Mercedes (another KingCast network whip) and asked them to ride one of their skateboards. They were understandably like, "who the hell is this guy," and asked me what I do and I started describing it and right away Lucas says "Liko Kenney."

And then it went on from there.

Lucas knew Liko within the past year and knew he was terrified of McKay.

You watch the 2007 video and read the online material I just posted and you'll know that as well.

Yet Kelly Ayotte told Attorney X "Murder," she wrote. Murder she wrote....

Those words will come back to bite her.

Namaste.
Title: Additional YouTube video and part of Motion for Declaratory Judgment.
Post by: Christopher King on August 10, 2007, 07:16 PM NHFT
Right here:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/motion-practice-601-3-kingcast-bashes.html

Excerpt:


Curiously, McKay claims that he told Liko Kenney his name. However Liko is heard asking his name and continues to address him as "this or that officer" after more law enforcement personnel appear.

The following are almost 100% accurate transcripts of the 2003 cruiser video as provided to the Court which includes an interior discussion heretofore unseen by most of the Free World.

20:48:00 "You don't have the right to keep me here without a good reason."

At 20:54:30: "I am requesting police assistance... You're torturing me... why are you harassing me? Can't you go arrest a drunk at a bar or something?"

Approx 20:55:00 "Get back in your fucking car," says McKay..... "Maybe you need to go back to school......" "You're in a suspicious place at a suspicious time."

At 21:00:00
"Get on your knees."
"What are you going to kill me?"
"You're going into a cruiser."
"Why, what have I done?"
"I don't know."

21:04:01 - "You can't pull people off the street and put them in handcuffs and drive them around for no reason." [comports with Judge Cyr's ruling].

21:05:46 - "I was sitting in my car resting before?driving home and now you've done this to me for no reason." [comports with Judge Cyr's ruling].

21:11:20?"You're resisting arrest."?"I'm resisting torture. You punched me in the face you hurt my injured neck you hurt both of my arms you hurt both of my legs all because I asked you a question." "You grabbed my testicles, correct?"?"I grabbed your testicles, hell no.?"[McKay laughs, does not say 'yes you did.']"?"You threw me to the ground and put your testicles in my face you fucking faggot."??

21:15:00 - "Why am I in handcuffs?" "[Officer Cox or Ball] Because you resisted arrest." "Why was I being arrested, why?" "[Officer Cox or Ball] I don't?understand what the original offense was." "That's?because there is no original offense." [comports with Judge Cyr's ruling].

21:15:30 - "He punched me in the face and you and him both saw him punch me in the face and you both are saying he didn't. I'm being beat up IN HANDCUFFS by 3 adult armed men who all have guns and I have NOTHING."

With all due respect the Court should realize that such is now the mind frame in which Liko Kenney spent the last four (4) years of his life: That of being subjected to an Unconstitutional beat down by Bruce McKay, a man with a gun and a badge and whose full personnel file the town of Franconia is assiduously trying to hide, in direct contravention to developing case law in New Hampshire and well-established Statutory and Decisional Case law in other Jurisdictions, as shall be noted in:
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time.
Post by: error on August 10, 2007, 07:19 PM NHFT
Cops lie, and their bosses cover it up. Why does anyone find this surprising?
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time
Post by: Quantrill on August 10, 2007, 07:20 PM NHFT
Holy crap that was a long post.

Informative, though...
Title: Beavis: Not surprising but what is surprising is this:
Post by: Christopher King on August 10, 2007, 10:27 PM NHFT
We have the opportunity to document it and there are going to be some serious repercussions.

-c
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time
Post by: KBCraig on August 11, 2007, 12:49 AM NHFT
I appreciate your work on it, Chris. Everything does need to come to light.
Title: Re: For KBCraig: NH AG Kelly Ayotte lied about the Franconia shootings. Big Time.
Post by: erisian on August 11, 2007, 05:55 PM NHFT
I live within two towns of Franconia, and I was working in Franconia at the time of the shootings. I have spoken with several people who grew up there with Liko. According to my sources, Liko wasn't the most stable person in town, and he had a serious problem with authority figures in general. As to his instability, one time when his uncle did something that pissed him off, Liko went to his uncle's house with a chainsaw and dropped a very large pine tree onto the house. A large part of Liko's history with McKay revolved around this ongoing feud between Liko and his uncle, who had an understandable tendency to call the cops on him.

So McKay was well acquainted with Liko, and knew how unstable he was. McKay also either knew or should have known that Liko had a pistol permit, which made it legal for Liko to carry a concealed and loaded weapon in his vehicle. McKay should have known this because in NH, the town police chief has to personally sign off on pistol permit applications, so Liko's application was certainly and undoubtedly known to the Franconia PD. There is also little doubt that McKay knew Liko's car, since this is a small town. So from before the time that McKay made the U-turn to chase Liko, he either knew or should have known that he would be attempting to detain an armed, mentally unstable suspect.

This brings me to my point. As I learned more about the history of both Liko and McKay, I started to see a growing set of similarities between this case and the Carl Drega incident in Colebrook some years ago, in which several people were killed, including a state cop and a judge. Nothing was mentioned in the media after the Drega incident about the bad blood between Drega and a local "Conservation Officer" (Game Warden) named Eric Stohl, who is now a state representative. The details aren't important here, what is important is the scenario of an authority "having it in for", in the words of one of my local sources, an armed, mentally unstable person. Drega was a PTSD 'Nam Vet who had his house ringed with surveillance cameras and a basement full of guns and ammo.

So what is it about these Dirty Harry wannabes that makes them want to go find some poor armed nut job who just wants to be left alone and push his buttons until he snaps???
Title: Yes Liko did have his issues......
Post by: Christopher King on August 11, 2007, 11:31 PM NHFT
But there are a few things that should be noted:

The property in question is probably not held exclusively by Bill Kenney, so when Bill cut off a tree to block Liko from riding the ATV through there Liko was pissed. I don't think he intended the tree to fall on the house, which is not to excuse his actions but to put them in proper perspective.

That having been said, I want to know exactly what NH AG Kelly Ayotte really "investigated" that would substantiate the reasonableness of the 6 week delay in providing the 2007 video:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-investigates-nh-ag-kelly.html

12 August 2007:

Re: Question on 6 week delay in providing 2007 Franconia shooting tragedy video.

Dear Counselors Ayotte and Strelzin:

Please identify by bates stamp or any other reasonable identifying system, each and every document from my media kit that you obtained AFTER 22 May, 2007 when I requested that you provide a copy of the 2007 cruiser video.

You know, pursuant to your "ongoing investigation."

See, none of Liko's friends or other folks in the area remember y'all coming out there after the first day or so to find out what was really going on in the community.

And I remember Attorney Strelzin not wanting us to record me telling him about the police problems up in the White Mountains, including that poor boy who was chained to a cop's jeep for sex.

And I remember....
posted by Christopher King at 8:54 PM   

Also, Liko's gun was illegal so there was no permit, but McKay knew about it and still went ahead and apparently violated town procedure on use of force and pepper spray. Read the relevant policy portions here:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-and-concord-monitor-say-key-to.html

Peace.
Title: Forgot about McKay's trash fire and the abandoned cats.
Post by: Christopher King on August 12, 2007, 11:52 AM NHFT
For real, he was a rent dead beat too, but the landlord, despite being a high-powered lawyer (he's a trustee at F-P law school) was too afraid to file a complaint on McKay.

Whoa.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-presents-rsa-91-request-to.html

Excerpt from RSA 91-A letter to Lisbon FD:

That having been said, could you please provide the following:

1. A copy of any and all audio transmissions involving a fire at any former residence of Franconia Corporal Bruce McKay.

2. A copy of any and all correspondence, including emails, activity logs or other reports to or from your department bearing the name "Bruce McKay" or in any way referring to him.

3. If not contemplated by the previous responses, please provide a copy of any invoices for services and receipts showing payment for services rendered at any residence of Franconia Corporal Bruce McKay.
Title: Bruce McKay scared a professional woman with a penis-shaped knife to her crotch.
Post by: Christopher King on August 16, 2007, 09:31 PM NHFT
Oh, yes he did.

And soon I'll have an affidavit about it, and the fact that the victim never got a response from Chief Montminy.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-exclusive-interview-and.html

I have to get back to the Motion, but here are key quotes of my 28:03 interview that started at 8:44pm. with Ms. "B," the victim of Kelly Ayotte hero Bruce McKays creative use of a

"penis-shaped knife."

She has already agreed to an affidavit under seal, but may go public.

Keep checking throughout the evening, but I will start with this:

"He said my lights weren't on but they were.... I was just trying to get to a lighted area but he was still upset with me, yelling at me because I didn't stop right away but it was snowing and cold and dark out."
"The knife was shaped like a penis, the top was like a spade on a card."
""What are you doing... I asked him 3 times."
"He did NOT even try to unbuckle the seatbelt."
"If he had ever stopped me again (after my complaint) I would call 911 and take my chances on getting to Littleton Police Department."
[EXACTLY WHAT LIKO TRIED TO DO but only going 800 feet to Tamarack]
"It was obvious Judge Cyr was annoyed with Bruce McKay when he dismissed my DUI case and he told McKay "It's a quantum leap from probable cause to DUI."
"I filed a 13 page report with Chief Montminy and I have a copy of it for you... but I never got a response from that."
"McKay saw my daughter was driving because he saw us get in the car."
"I told my daughter 'don't roll down your window this guy is nuts....' and 'Bruce you know I wasn't driving you saw us get in the car...."
Title: Re: Bruce McKay stuck a penis-shaped knife in a handcuffed woman's crotch.
Post by: penguins4me on August 17, 2007, 08:36 AM NHFT
Christopher, thank you for digging up this information; I look forward to seeing what becomes of this.

I'm saddened by this, but also feel it to be very important to point out that while, yes, many of the uniformed LEOs we have are fine, upstanding people, there are a certain number of brutal thugs with badges... and bosses who cover for them. They cannot be allowed to get away with their abuses!
Title: Re: Bruce McKay stuck a penis-shaped knife in a handcuffed woman's crotch.
Post by: kola on August 17, 2007, 09:41 AM NHFT
McKay was bad fricken' apple. What goes around comes around. Let it be a lesson to other goon-cops/thugs who think they are above the law and ignore our Constitution.

I have the right to protect myself and others have the choice as well. If I feel my life is being threatened I will take the appropriate actions...no matter who it may be.

This McKay guy was a scumbag.

Kola


Title: Re: Bruce McKay stuck a penis-shaped knife in a handcuffed woman's crotch.
Post by: grasshopper on August 17, 2007, 11:24 AM NHFT
   I know a few "adrenalin jumkie" cops.  They are dangerous! 
   I have a brother that is a part time officer for the state of NH in a small town.  He told me that most of the officers on the force he'd never have around his children or his property.   He also told me that most of them don't give a shit about the constitution.  They are mostly good people but only care for themselves.  All in all, this is not a bad thing.  If the SHTF, we know how it will turn out and who to "splain things to" if they step out of line.
  For instance: http://youtube.com/watch?v=-taU9d26wT4

  An other good sight..http://users.bart.nl/users/lightnet/creator/gunconfiscation.htm

  Some of these cops need to be reigned in and the way to do it is to scare the crap out of them.
Title: Re: Bruce McKay stuck a penis-shaped knife in a handcuffed woman's crotch.
Post by: penguins4me on August 17, 2007, 01:57 PM NHFT
Hadn't seen this posted on the blawg: 2007 dashcam video of McKay/Kinney incident, from the U-turn to just after the pepper-spraying and subsequent first shooting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8olEn237h8

Title: Re: Bruce McKay stuck a penis-shaped knife in a handcuffed woman's crotch.
Post by: Christopher King on August 17, 2007, 06:10 PM NHFT
Yeah, I hadn't posted it too often. Don't know why, guess I just figured everyone has seen it.

There will be a new site soon with better navigation and easier to follow.

Back to writing the Motion, here's a quick update on the personnel file portion:

********

In this case the purpose of the Right-to-Know law is to determine whether a man paid with taxpayer monies who carriers a gun and who wears a badge was a dangerous instrumentality, and if so, whether the town of Franconia knew about it and what steps they took or failed to take to address it.

The requested documents in this case that Plaintiff wishes to make public are primarily any documents that reflect complaints against McKay, compliments, disciplinary actions (vis a vis the absence thereof), any physical, mental or emotional issues that may affect his ability to perform the functions of a police officer, and any other acts or concerns that might cast doubt on his ability to successfully function as a police officer.

See, the documents that they have produced fall well short of that, and the media is entitled to full access subject to reasonable restrictions on publication. That is far different than having the government tell us "you can come down here and pick up what we decide to give you."

Let's continue on to the Nitty-Gritty of State v. Theodosopoulos, shall we?


The Defendant in that case had been involved in an automobile collision with an officer and sought "all information, documentation or disciplinary memoranda which would serve as exculpatory evidence either where the information relates to (Officer) Defina's credibility or his use of police vehicles."

The Attorney General's office lost a Supreme Court challenge over a Hooksett Court ruling that compelled production of a police officer's personnel file. The Supreme Court held that the lower Court did not err in providing substantial portions of the file instead of using an in-camera inspection because the Defendant is entitled to ALL exculpatory evidence, and that's what was requested.

In this case, Plaintiff is analogously moving for exculpatory evidence for Liko Kenney, who repeatedly voiced his concerns that he was scared of Bruce McKay as were many other people in the community. The public has a Right-to-Know anything and everything that is in McKay's file that in any way implicates lack of fitness. In essence, the exculpatory file in this case goes beyond the set of things that concern operation of a motor vehicle and extends to the set of things that govern the operation of his badge.
Title: Re: Bruce McKay stuck a penis-shaped knife in a handcuffed woman's crotch.
Post by: KBCraig on August 17, 2007, 08:38 PM NHFT
Quote from: Christopher King on August 17, 2007, 06:10 PM NHFT
There will be a new site soon with better navigation and easier to follow.

That will be nice. I enjoy your take on things, but I do have a complaint: when you link to evidence, it's usually just a link to another of your blog entries where you mention the subject. Links to actual .pdfs, rulings, etc., would be great!

Kevin
Title: On the links..... and the biggest lies to date and the Court ORDER......
Post by: Christopher King on August 18, 2007, 08:35 AM NHFT
Yeah I apologize for that, however I am of very limited time.

For example, if I link to something describing Judge Cyr's rulings:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/07/kingcast-watches-as-concerned-faces-ask.html

Once you get there and scroll down you will see what's up and see the actual links.

Also, here's the latest; I'll JPEG the Court ORDER later.

And the draft Motion is here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/249005/Motion-Final-1

**************

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-catches-another-huge-kelly.html

17 August 2007

KingCast catches another huge Kelly Ayotte lie before finishing the Franconia RSA 91-A Motion for Declaratory Judgment.

P. 42 of the Official Report:

"Floyd was unarmed at the time he witnessed Liko Kenney shoot Cpl. McKay and then strike Cpl. McKay with his vehicle."

No he wasn't. Or I suppose that bullet hole in the windshield just majestically got there, huh?

What Kelly said is entirely inconsistent wiith the contents of her own investigative files. Let me help explain, using Caleb at p. 687 and Gregory W. Floyd's own son at 91-A pdf page 745:

Caleb: "That guy I thought pretty much had the gun pointed at us before we even got on the road."

Floyd: "They had stopped in front of his arm the first time. They didn't actually hit the officer. Then they backed up to here and at that time my dad got out and tried to pull him to prevent him from running him over again" [KingCast says wait a minute: Run him over again??? There was absolutely nothing to keep Liko from running McKay over the first time -- but he didn't. Liko was just trying to get the hell out of there.] They backed up to here and the car went rushing forward and my dad shot at the driver and it hit him and made him stop. The front end of the car ended up over the officer's chest."

Can't get away from that material inconsistency and that is all the more reason why the entire files have to be hosted online.
posted by Christopher King at 10:36 PM   


4 Comments:

When I look at that picture of Kelly I no longer see a lawyer. I see a liar and a gangster, just as I quoted my boy Al Pacino in Carlito's Way to Sean Penn, as Lawyer Kleinfeld:

""You ain't a lawyer no more, Kelly. You a gangster. You're on the Other Side now.... a whole new ballgame. You can't learn it in school and you can't get a late start."
By Christopher King, at 10:56 PM 


LIKO WAS ORDERED BY A JUDGE TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH BRUCE MCKAY ...

See page 362 RETURN FROM SUPERIOR COURT

"No inderect or direct contact with Bruce Mckay"

This was part of his probation!!!
By JP, at 11:26 PM 


I know.

I just didn't post it because I didn't want to steal the thunder from Mark Sisti & crew and thought they were going to file at the time and wanted them to go with it first. But I was going to put it in the Motion for Declaratory Judgment which is next week anyway and what the hell the cat's out of the proverbial bag now so let's have at it, shall we:
Title: Here's the draft motion I will put my name to.
Post by: Christopher King on August 18, 2007, 03:05 PM NHFT
The first one was kind of nappy but this one is All Good.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-completes-rsa-91-right-to-know.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/249326/Motion-for-Liko-1

Peace.
Title: Threat of lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: Christopher King on August 23, 2007, 01:48 PM NHFT
And of course as if on cue I threatened them with a copy of this on the 14th and now all of a sudden look what pops up:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/08/kingcast-victories-under-threat-of.html

See what I'm wondering is wouldn't New Hampshire be a much better place if we didn't have to sue in order to get documents that the government owes us in the first place?

Here are the substantive issues:

Okay. They have now agreed to provide copies of all emails bearing the names Liko Kenney and Bruce McKay on them. That does not mean that I am going to withdraw that as part of RSA 91-A Right-to-Know Motion for Declaratory Judgment because I want the law settled and their response presented a level of ambiguity with which I am not comfortable, i.e. "to determine whether your request will be granted" as opposed to "sure, hold on a few days, Mr. King."

Okay. They have finally agreed to share the full correspondence file between their office and former AAG Attorney X. There was a tortured history in that process however that I will link later here it is and that threat of imminent lawsuit clearly had some juice to it. I have not decided whether I will remove that issue from the Motion. Note that they claim to have provided the full correspondence file with John P, however they.... did not, as linked here.

Okay. They have agreed to produce the correspondence between their office and any and all PAST elected officials regarding the events of 5/11 but I clearly asked for "and and all past or presently-elected officials," so that is still ripe for adjudication unless that was a typographical error. I will inquire on that, and the response will likely dictate the KingCast course of action on that matter.

I will scan their responsive letter dated 21 August 2007 later today but note that they did not provide me the option of coming in to review the documents, instead noting that the cost would be $105.50 for the 422 pages. But I'm not going to want all of those pages because probably a quarter of them are mine anyway. And they have to provide me that option as they did with John P, because that's the law:

Each public body or agency shall, upon request for any public record reasonably described, make available for inspection and copying any such public record within its files when such records are immediately available for such release....

All in all, a Good Day for the KingCaster, but more importantly a Good Day for Liko Kenney and JUSTICE.



Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: KBCraig on September 23, 2007, 08:08 PM NHFT
http://www.caledonianrecord.com/pages/local_news/story/5c1d5ec66

In Wake Of Franconia Shootings

Lawsuit Filed Against Town, Selectmen, Police Chief, A.G.

BY AMY ASH NIXON, Staff Writer
Wednesday September 19, 2007

NORTH HAVERHILL, N.H. -- A lawsuit was filed in Grafton County Superior Court this week by an operator of a law-related blog and Web site that has consistently fired attacks at the way the state has allegedly failed to investigate many details involved in the aftermath of the shooting death of Liko Kenney.

Chris King, of KingCast.net, has filed suit in Superior Court against Attorney General Kelly Ayotte over the state's mishandling, in his view, of what happened after the evening Kenney, 24, of Easton, killed Franconia Police officer Cpl. Bruce McKay in May of this year.

Also named in the suit are the town of Franconia's board of selectmen, its police chief and the town itself.

(It's a very long article. See the URL above for details.)
Title: State of NH violated its own Right to Know policy, no Commission reports!
Post by: Christopher King on October 01, 2007, 08:30 PM NHFT
Oh, yeah take a look:

http://nhindymedia.org/newswire/display/4940/index.php

Excerpt:

christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/10/kingcast-reveals-another-letter-to.html

"I and many others applaud the efforts Chris King is making in pushing the town of Franconia and the State to release all documents pertinent to the May 11, 2007 deaths of Liko Kenney and Bruce McKay. It is unfortunate that a lawsuit is required to force our Government to be open and honest......It seems to me our Selectboard is working for the Town's insurance company, not the citizens who elected them.

Each Selectman, as an officer of the Town, is required to take an oath of office pursuant to RSA 42:1, said oath requiring compliance with the laws of the state of New Hampshire. I ask you to honor the oath you took, to do anything less will never help this community to heal. We look to you for leadership, and you have failed us. My final advice for the board to consider is, "Healing begins with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth". Let's finally consider the course of truth, for the good of all."
Title: NH AG lawyers lost prior RSA 91-A cases in North Country
Post by: Christopher King on November 09, 2007, 02:44 PM NHFT
Oh, yeah:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/open-letter-to-ag-and-franconia-counsel.html

Open Letter:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/478192/Welcome-to-07E268

The Attorneys of Record are:

Defendant Ayotte:
Nancy J. Smith (Senior)
James W. Kennedy


Defendants Franconia/Montminy:
Daniel Mullen (former NH AAG)

***********

Attorney Smith lost a case dealing with improper funding at NH Technical College for abuse of Pell Grants, Case no. 96-11-SP, at the same time I was starting to successfully litigate V1996-61481, in which the police caused my client Michael Isreal to be a victim of violent crime. Watch Mr. Isreal sing negro spirituals in the hallway at Civil Rights protester Jerry Doyle's acquittal for Criminal Trespassing at the Columbus School Board in the KingCast short film, "American Lawyer One."

But more significantly, she and Attorney Mullen lost the RSA 91-A case with Fred Murray, father of Maura Murray, Grafton 2006-113 or 154 N.H. 579, 913 A.2d 737 (2006) that I am sitting down to read right now. Now that I've read it, it smacks of the same niggardly and irrational lack of document production I have seen in Liko's case. I've been a supporter of the Murray's cause ever since I heard of the matter, and years ago Liko Kenney and one of his friends, who is now a friend of mine, helped Mr. Murray look for his daughter during a chance encounter.

Attorney Mullen, as Senior AAG, lost the Murray case as noted above and lost the RSA 91-A case of Union Leader v. City of Nashua, Case No. 95-105.

So let's see how it goes from here but keep this in mind as I have discussed with several concerned attorneys:

the competing harms rule with Floyd what she obviously forgot which many people do, is this:
The burden of proof is NOW ON the State of New Hampshire to PROVE beyond ALL reasonable doubt that Floyd's actions killing Liko Kenney prevented a greater harm from being done. We don't think she can prove that.


Related post: Why did Primex Insurance bail out?

posted by Christopher King at 3:31 AM | 6 comments 

You guys hang in there. Would come up Tuesday to Manch but I have a rather remarkable achievement that night. Watch the blawg late that night or I'll post it, but it will at least partially restore your faith in some governement  :icon_pirat:
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: Dave Ridley on November 10, 2007, 07:10 PM NHFT
haven't seen you in a while chris welcome back
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: bill rose on November 11, 2007, 04:11 PM NHFT
this is a warning to the police and the public

police lie

they are people and have emotions

small penis is the
we give them the power of robots and expect their emotions not to abuse it

p.s. i love the ann coulter ad just above
funny
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: Kat Kanning on November 11, 2007, 04:18 PM NHFT
I've seen police lie many times.
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: firecracker joe on November 11, 2007, 05:05 PM NHFT
I saw the police tell the truth once, once!
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: Christopher King on November 14, 2007, 06:51 AM NHFT
Quote from: jose on November 11, 2007, 05:05 PM NHFT
I saw the police tell the truth once, once!

Oh, you did not.  ;)

Well maybe you did, though..... because once I saw a government official do something right, and that was last night when Nashua Mayor Bernie Streeter actually gave me a commendation for standing up for the First Amendment and Right-to-Know:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/blogger-kingcastnet-receives-first.html

13 November 2007

Blogger KingCast.net receives First Amendment Mayoral Commendation in Nashua, New Hampshire.


KingCast, Mayor Streeter and Alderman Teeboom celebrate the occasion first noted herein.

Quote"I've always felt welcome here in Nashua at various board meetings and even our disputes at the School Board have been handled professionally... but that hasn't been true elsewhere in the State...... "Whether you believe Liko Kenney committed murder, manslaughter or justifiable homicide," I said..... We have a system of jurisprudence in America and he was entitled to a jury trial and not to be executed by a 3-time felon named Gregory W. Floyd."

We'll have it up on video soon, but what we really want on video is that feature length movie about a town that truly healed itself in the wake of a tragedy of the highest order.
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: Christopher King on November 14, 2007, 06:54 AM NHFT
Quote from: DadaOrwell on November 10, 2007, 07:10 PM NHFT
haven't seen you in a while chris welcome back

Hey thanks! I'll bust on on Tuesday to meet you -- obviously I was busy last night  :icon_pirat:
Title: Re: Threat of Franconia lawsuit coughs up 422 pp. of documents from NH AG
Post by: Christopher King on November 26, 2007, 02:34 AM NHFT
Quote from: wholetthedogin? on November 14, 2007, 09:37 AM NHFT
Chris, what are Floyd's felony convictions?

Marijuana (which I don't care about but it's still a Felony)
PCP (which I definitely care about)
Stealing a marble Virgin Mary Theft by Taking (which I definitely care about)

http://aycu35.webshots.com/image/27514/2006103080524222987_rs.jpg
http://aycu39.webshots.com/image/25918/2000010410413079033_rs.jpg
http://aycu08.webshots.com/image/32327/2004222911330897276_rs.jpg
http://aycu01.webshots.com/image/32000/2004206426596597400_rs.jpg

This is a great thread that has a lot of document JPEG'd you won't see anywhere else:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/kingcast-says-its-official-kelly-ayotte_10.html

Meanwhile:

Breaking News:

I Noticed Kelly for Deposition 14 December 2007.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/kingcast-says-defendant-ayotte-looks.html

22 November 2007

KingCast says Defendant Ayotte looks enthused about receiving her 2007 First Amendment/RSA 91-A Christmas present: A Notice of Deposition.

I will bear no compunction to videotape it and air it on YouTube. If she's confident in her investigation and confident in her knowledge of the law and of her actions, she should voice no objection.
Title: Re: KingCast sends Notice of Deposition to NH AG Kelly Ayotte on Franconia cover
Post by: KBCraig on November 26, 2007, 04:00 AM NHFT
Chris, thanks for the updates. It's an important case, and it's important to have people like you who dive deeply into such cases, for the sake of edifying those of us who don't have the knowledge and/or access that you have developed.
Title: Re: KingCast sends Notice of Deposition to NH AG Kelly Ayotte on Franconia cover
Post by: penguins4me on November 27, 2007, 09:34 AM NHFT
If not for people such as Chris, this and other events like them would be quietly buried in the past as 'that one story about the guy who just went crazy and snapped, for no reason', just like the long list of such stories we already have. It's quite ironic that those outside the 'justice system' oft seem to be more interested in justice than those inside.
Title: Re: KingCast sends Notice of Deposition to NH AG Kelly Ayotte on Franconia cover
Post by: Christopher King on November 27, 2007, 09:09 PM NHFT
Quote from: penguins4me on November 27, 2007, 09:34 AM NHFT
If not for people such as Chris, this and other events like them would be quietly buried in the past as 'that one story about the guy who just went crazy and snapped, for no reason', just like the long list of such stories we already have. It's quite ironic that those outside the 'justice system' oft seem to be more interested in justice than those inside.

and:

Chris, thanks for the updates. It's an important case, and it's important to have people like you who dive deeply into such cases, for the sake of edifying those of us who don't have the knowledge and/or access that you have developed.

Thanks guys. Remember we have more in common than different. I would love to have time to work with you on some of your issues, but I'm so caught up in this, and as you all know, coming back from felony indictments and more in the last 18 months even.  So I have a lot to offer you guys too but right now you really need to keep a keen eye on this case to see what Kelly does with the Notice of Video Deposition. The stronger I am the stronger you are.

She's going to try to quash it, I betcha'.... but on what grounds?

Nothing reasonable or respectable.

Bernie was right. He knew what he was doing with that Commendation.

Namaste.
Title: Re: Meeting with Franconia lawyer reveals more lies from NH AG Ayotte.
Post by: Christopher King on December 01, 2007, 09:21 AM NHFT
More news here:

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2007/11/kingcast-meets-with-franconia-counsel.html

30 November 2007
KingCast meets with Franconia Counsel Mullen and finds more complaints on McKay, including a lie by the NH AG's office and violations of force policy