Distracted driving: Legislating common sense

[Pat McCotter]

Govt: Nearly 6,000 deaths from driver distraction
By KEN THOMAS, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – Opening a government meeting on auto safety, the Obama administration reported Wednesday that nearly 6,000 people were killed and a half-million injured last year in vehicle crashes connected to driver distraction, a striking indication of the dangers of using mobile devices behind the wheel.

The Transportation Department was bringing together experts over two days for what it's calling a "distracted driving summit" to take a hard look at the highway hazards caused by drivers talking on cell phones or texting from behind the wheel. Secretary Ray LaHood was expected to offer recommendations Thursday that could lead to new restrictions on using the devices while driving.

Ultimately, LaHood said, he wanted the meeting to set "the stage for finding ways to eliminate texting while driving."

"You see people texting and driving and using cell phones and driving everywhere you go, even in places where it's outlawed, like Washington, D.C. We feel a very strong obligation to point to incidents where people have been killed or where serious injury has occurred," LaHood said.

Hours before the start of the meeting, Transportation officials said in a research report that 5,870 people were killed and 515,000 were injured last year in crashes where at least one form of driver distraction was reported. Driver distraction was involved in 16 percent of all fatal crashes in 2008.

The panel of government officials, safety advocates, researchers and lawmakers hoped to develop a consensus on the roadway hazards and hear warnings from young adults who caused car accidents because they were texting while driving.

The new data underscored the major problem of distractions involving young drivers. The greatest proportion of distracted drivers were those age 20 and under. Sixteen percent of all under-20 drivers involved in fatal crashes were reported to have been distracted while driving, the government said.

Eighteen states and the District of Columbia have passed laws making texting while driving illegal and seven states and the district have banned driving while talking on a handheld cell phone, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Many safety groups have urged a nationwide ban on texting and on using handheld mobile devices while behind the wheel.

In July, the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute found that when drivers of heavy trucks texted, their collision risk was 23 times greater. Dialing a cell phone and using or reaching for an electronic device increased risk of collision about six times in cars and trucks.

The Virginia Tech researchers found the risks of texting generally applied to all drivers, not just truckers. A separate report by Car and Driver magazine found that texting and driving is more dangerous than drunken driving.

Congress is watching closely. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who will address the gathering, and other Democrats introduced legislation in July that would require states to ban texting or e-mailing while operating a moving vehicle or lose 25 percent of their annual federal highway funding. The Obama administration has not taken a position on the bill.

Some groups want tough laws on the distractions. The National Safety Council wants a total ban on cell phone use while driving. The Washington-based Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety has petitioned the government to consider federal rules that restrict talking and texting by drivers of tractor trailers, motor coaches and large vans.

"What we're saying is, 'Let's be proactive on this.' Let's get in there now and start evaluating these technologies and figure out which ones pose safety risks," said Jacqueline Gillan, vice president for Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety.

Other groups have focused on texting, which has grown from nearly 10 billion messages a month in December 2005 to more than 110 billion in December 2008, according to CTIA-The Wireless Association, the cellular phone industry's trade group.

The Governors Highway Safety Association, which represents state highway safety officials, recently reversed course and said it would support new laws banning texting behind the wheel. The Alliance for Automobile Manufacturers, which represents 11 automakers, including General Motors, Ford and Toyota, said it supports a ban on texting and phone calls using handheld devices.

CTIA also supports a ban on texting while driving but has argued that education and enforcement are critical to changing driver behavior. CTIA and the National Safety Council announced plans for public service announcements warning teen drivers of the dangers of distracted driving.

[Ogre]

I want to show up at one of these meetings to ban french fries in portable containers because they are dangerous and lead to distracted drivers.

[KBCraig]

I want to show up at one of these meetings to ban french fries in portable containers because they are dangerous and lead to distracted drivers.

Cupholders.

Stereos.

GPS nav systems.

Children in the car.

[Fluff and Stuff]

GPS nav systems.

But there's no point in having a car if you cannot use a GPS.

[KBCraig]

GPS nav systems.

But there's no point in having a car if you cannot use a GPS.

There's no point in having a car if you have to rely on GPS to get where you're going.

[K. Darien Freeheart]

I text while I drive. I've never harmed anybody nor caused property damage to another human being (unless someone had pet squirrels...) while operating a motor vehicle.

I don't like people threatening me.

[KBCraig]

Today's local paper had an editorial singing the high praises of the new Arkansas law (took effect today) that bans texting while driving.

My letter to the editor:

To the editor:

Distracted driving is certainly a problem today, but there are already laws against distracted driving. They can, and should be, enforced.

However, I must disagree with your editorial ("Distracted Driving", published 10/1/2009). In that editorial, you wrote, "This is a good law. It will save lives. It should be obeyed. And it should be aggressively enforced."

"Good law"? No. It is a "feel-good law".

"Save lives"? No. No law can ever prevent stupid behavior, only punish it after the fact.

"Should be obeyed"? I give you that one, because texting while driving is obviously unsafe. (Or, at least it is while in traffic. While on a desolate rural interstate, it's arguable.)

"Aggressively enforce"? Sorry, it can't be. Even during legislative hearings, advocates admitted that it couldn't be enforced at all. "Texting" means pushing buttons on a cell phone. This law didn't address manually dialing numbers, scrolling through an address book, surfing the internet, playing games on a phone, etc., all of which also involve pushing buttons on the phone. From the outside, all those activities appear identical, so police cannot have probable cause to stop someone they see pushing buttons on a phone, when every activity involving pushing buttons on a phone while driving (save one) is still legal.

When someone causes an accident by distracted driving, it doesn't matter if they're texting, adjusting the stereo, dealing with a crying child in the back seat, applying makeup, or trying to choke down a super-sized breakfast combo while running late for work.

This law creates a crime that can only be determined after the fact: if someone is accused of distracted driving, police might be able to subpoena their cell phone records, and show they were texting at the time of the accident, and that it caused them to be at fault.

They could do exactly same thing before this law passed, if they could show the driver was distracted by eating, the stereo, children, reading, applying makeup, etc.

Laws that change nothing are always bad laws.