Canadian Judge Begins Legal Clampdown on “Freeman” Movement

[Silent_Bob]

http://theintelhub.com/2012/10/01/canadian-judge-begins-legal-clampdown-on-freeman-movement/

Judge John Rooke the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench in Canada has promised to destroy the "Free Man on the Land Movement.

In a newly released court decision John Rooke analyzes the movement, which he refers to as "organized pseudolegal commercial argument" or OPCA litigants. His 185-page analysis of their arguments was posted on the Alberta Justice court website on Thursday.

This same judge was in the news not too long ago when he called a rape victim "stupid" during the sentencing of the man who raped her.  He then went ahead and only sentenced the rapist to 3 1/2 years in prison.

The Free Man on the Land movement consists of a growing number of people who are beginning to turn the rhetoric and legalese of the state against itself.

According to the nationalistic folklore put forward by the courts, people are only ruled because they consent to being ruled, so many of these people are withdrawing their consent from the system.

As much of a great concept as this as, and as much as everyone should be encouraged to pursue this lifestyle, there is one fatal flaw in this approach that must be remembered.

That flaw is that the whole system is a fraud to begin with, and the system will bend to the whims of authority regardless of what has been written into law previously.  It is this flaw, that may begin to cause complications for those in Canada who have declared their Independence.

In the document released this week the Judge said that:

"These persons employ a collection of techniques and arguments promoted and sold by 'gurus' to disrupt court operations and to attempt to frustrate the legal rights of governments, corporations and individuals.

The persons who advance these schemes, and particularly those who market and sell these concepts as commercial products, are parasites that must be stopped"

It unbelievably ironic for a judge to say that an individual who claims sovereignty over themselves is a parasite, when that is the very essence of a bureaucrats existence.

The judge has also accused these people of "clogging up the system" with paperwork and court dates, however, they are merely following the legal code to a tee without taking all of the deals and settlements that have been put into place to keep up with the incredible volume of cased that are coming through the system.

It is still too soon to tell how this ruling will effect legal cases for those who have claimed their independence, but due to the legal systems subjective concept of law it is highly possible that the law will be restructured to favor those in authority.

[Russell Kanning]

Threats to the Queen's realm :-)