Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 28

[JosephSHaas]

Open Letter, reply to:

JUDGE MATHIS
Justice That Makes A Difference

Attn: Michael Hart, Senior Producer

--Thank you for your letter of July 18, 2008, re-typed below:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"Joseph Haas
PO BOX 3842
Concord, NH 03302

Dear Joseph:

--While researching the public records of small claims lawsuits filed in your area, we ran across the case you recently filed.  We are hoping to help you get the money you feel you deserve.

--We know that suing someone is an aggravating, time-consuming process.  To make matters worse, even if a Judge in your area orders the Defendant to pay, YOU MAY NEVER see any of the money, because you are responsible for collecting from the Defendant NOT the court.  Even if you were able to garnish the Defendant's wages, it could take years before you are paid in full.

--'JUDGE MATHIS' is a court program that has been hearing cases for the past nine years.  In 1995, Judge Greg Mathis was elected one of the youngest Judges in America.  The ruling he makes are FINAL, LEGAL and BINDING.

--If we select your case for 'JUDGE MATHIS' to hear, and if you win, YOU WILL receive the TOTAL judgment awarded in our court, we guarantee it!

--Please call me as soon as possible so that we can attempt to help you get the justice you seek!  Please call me toll free at 1-877-721-9810.  This toll free line takes messages 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.  Please leave a message anytime and I will return your call as soon as I can.

--Remember, if you win your case, I will take care of getting you the money that you are awarded.  We also take care of travel expenses to and from Chicago.

Sincererly,

Michael Hart
Senior Producer

207 E. OHIO STREET, Box # 333  PHONE 312-836-3300  FAX 312-836-7613"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-- My reply to follow.  In the meantime, to check out:

1. http://judgemathis.com/

2. http://askjudgemathis.com/

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Mathis (born: April 5, 1960)

4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r13fttHz_s   ________

5. http://television.aol.com/show/judge-mathis/250188/main [CW-TV @ 9:00 a.m.*?]

6. http://www.tv.com/judge-mathis/show/17208/summary.html

7. http://www.imdb.com/rtitle/tt0346307/ [ at: 2:00 o'clock p.m.*]
    "Real people with real disputes before a real judge delivering real justice"...
     ...with real lawful money! 

8. http://www.geocities.com/southernerwriters/judgegregmathis.html

JSH

[JosephSHaas]

See my Reply #7626 above, just posted at exactly 9:45 a.m. earlier this morning.

To call the 877 # to talk with Mr. Hart later after I do my homework.

In the meantime, here's my first-draft:

--Thanks Michael for what is my ONLY case #______________ at the Concord, N.H. District Court CRIMINAL Complaint against United States Marshal, Stephen R. Monier for almost $400.00 yet to put into a Summons when the check he gave me ripens into a prima facie case of a bad check this Friday, August 1st '08 @ 8:15 o'clock a.m. IF he does NOT "pay" me the lawful money as required by his oath of office to honor the U.S. Const., and laws of this nation, including section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792.

--Your letter refers to a "FINAL"ity of "LEGAL" matters, but I'd like to go ONE STEP BEYOND to the "lawful" as in the difference between "legal tender" notes of the Federal Reserve System variety that are supposed to be made redeemable by 12 U.S. Code Sec. 411 into both types of money: (1) the const. itutional money of the quality as prescribed to be a dollar of so many grains of silver (or gold), or (2) the commerce "money" as defined by the Coinage Act of 1965 to run con-current with the Coinage Act of 1792. The state is FORBIDDEN to make any thing but gold "and" silver coin a tender in payment of debt by Art. I, Sec. 10, U.S. Const. and this includes its political sub-divisions called cities and towns, see Art. 28-a, Part First, N.H. Const. & Bill of Rights. Plus a "dollar" is a unit of measurement, like gallons.  And so as an example: #__ gallons of what? water or gasoline.  Thus: #__ dollars of what? gold or silver coin. Also: Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act is the binding contract that there be so many bars of gold deposited per pallet of FRNs "monetized", but the U.S. Mint REFUSES to answer with details this F.O.I.A. request of mine suggesting that the Presidential candidates put this as a plank on their platform for an audit starting January 20th, 2009.

--The timing of your letter, postmarked Sat., July 19th '08 from ZIP CODE 60607 in the #10 envelope is perfect!  I think what I'll do is maybe not go for the entire $dollar amount of the check, in CRIMINAL court, but maybe half, reserving my right to endorse upon the back of the check as payment(s) are received, in duplicate to the debtor, so that IF the local judge dis-honors his N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 92:2 oath of office, http://www.state.nh.us/ I can take the $______ remainder to Small Claims Court in Concord to be transferred to you under some contract? Between who?  The parties agreeing to accept a free round-trip train (or plane) trip "of travel expenses to and from Chicago", leaving me to pick up the tabs for meals, motels, and get back on the train over to Michigan for a rental car to go see Ed Brown, my friend BEFORE his arrest on this anti-I.R.S. stuff, first meeting him back in the 1980s when Martin J. "Red" Beckman * came to the state of New Hampshire on a campaign stop in his running for President of the United States.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - -  Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

--* See:

1. http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/83/83.F3d.426.95-35478.95-35473.html of some case thrown out of the Ninth Circuit for "no material facts at issue" excuse for NO jury trial of Mr. & Mrs. Beckman (Earlene) v.s. Alan GREENSPAN, Fed. Chairman, the IRS Commissioner, and others, details in 83 F3d 426 (1996)? ____

2. Red's book: "The IRS and the black robed cover-up" 1980, 187 p. $15.00 Cat No. 71444 at http://www.bolerium.com/cgi-bin/bol48/71444.html for: Bolerium Books, 2141 Mission Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, CA 94110, M-F 10-6, Sat. 12-6, closed Sunday.

3. co-author with Bill Benson of: "The Law That Never Was" http://mhkeehn.tripod.com/FederalZone/02intro.pdf - - but see the more basic phrase of: "to law and collect" in the 16th Amendment, and my Reply #____ above of to lay meaning either to apply or impose, the latter of to levy and collect, so George Orwellian double-talk of to collect and collect? No! Not for me, I assert my 9th Amendment rights against such "doublespeak" and choose to apply as in a request and tell the I.R.S.: Request Denied! [ref. Kirby Ferris, writer for a weekly newspaper, and Vietnam Vet Mike Taylor, of Congress canNOT amend the Const. by a simple bill through both houses and signed by the President, it must be ratified by the states, or by convention.]

4. http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/email/box043/msg04340.htm for Paul Andrew Mitchell, of Arizona (?) +/or CAlif. (?) for a "Red" Beckman update please, cc: supremelawfirm at msn dot com (+/or at gmail dot com). _______

[JosephSHaas]

Somebody just e-mailed me this June 15, 2007 report of Irwin Schiff with Ed & Elaine mentioned therein about this "diesel treatment".

http://infowars.net/articles/june2007/150607Schiff.htm

My guess is that the goons have revised the program after the 78-year old Schiff results to better treat 60+ year olds like Ed Brown.

[JosephSHaas]

Hey Mr. Wilson! 

New info:

I just called the USP Marion in Illinois @ 1-618-964-1441 http://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/mar/index.jsp and spoke with the officer in charge who tried to connect me to Mr. Wilson's voice mail for HOW to get on Ed's visiting list, ....

He might also be THE officer to get Channel 9 W.M.U.R.-T.V. a phone connection. Reference: Sean McDonald @ 603: 641-9028, 4 rings gets you to his voice mail.  I just left him Mr. Wilson's # to call for that interview (in person in the prison yard?).

-- Joe

Modification: I just had a nice chat with Mr. Wilson about a half hour ago.  As soon as Ed signs the Visitation Form to get it processed, my guess was that it takes about a month, and that he confirmed, so maybe to see Ed in September?

[JosephSHaas]

I've just commented to that UNION LEADER http://www.unionleader.com/ newspaper story about: "New law: Threats lead to jail time" by TRENT SPINER of last Thursday, July 24 '08 over at:

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=New+law%3a+Threats+lead+to+jail+time&articleId=099e32aa-880d-474d-869f-7367b437ae49

to be exact; better late than never. There being nineteen (19) COMMENTS so far from Bruce M. in Brentwood to Ralph Holder of Newton, NH.

JSH

Modification: Reply #98 (my Post #1358) over at page 7 of 7 @ 1:51 p.m. today, reference the: "Joe Haas Arrested" chapter here, placed there, in case somebody might need this research in their current or future case combating these George Orwellian "1984" double-talkers. [5124 views].

http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=9345.90

[JosephSHaas]

Notice:

Jason's sentencing is for: 11:00 o'clock a.m today. in Concord, N.H. courtroom #____.

Does anybody here know what the Title _____ U.S. Code Section _______ (or Rule #_____) is for to allow the "victim's statement"s to be allowed to be presented in writing +/or verbally?

My victim status is that of an uncalled witness, with transferred witness check endorsed to me that the Marshal is REFUSING to pay by section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792 that he has taken an oath to obey the constitution and laws of the United States.

And then he takes custody of the inmate from the state-federal contract of withIN the state system to the B.O.P.* to be educated at the F.C.I.!?** Taught NOT to question the lawful*** and legal**** being of when the Feds operate against the law as outlaws that the victims and witnesses have no say!? or else sent to the penitentiary for punishment!?

-* Bureau of Prisons
** Federal "Correctional" Institute

***   1-8-17 U.S. Const.
**** N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1
Will his attorney present into evidence the gold-sealed certificate of non-filing, so at least it's put into the appeal to Boston for the First Circuit (to exhaust all local and regional (district and circuit) remedies before David Hacket Souter of the Supremes grants a Writ of Habeas Corpus from Washington, D.C.) See http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

[JosephSHaas]

To: The United States District Court
      District of New Hampshire
      55 Pleasant Street
      Concord, N.H. 03301

RE: Victim Impact Statement &
       NOTICE OF CLAIM FOR ADMISSIONS:

Would the court please find that:

1. Do you admit that: Rule 32(a) for Definitions, and (2) defines a "Victim" to be "an individual against whom the defendant committed an offense for which the court will impose sentence." ? See http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/Rule32.htm for the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

2. Do you admit that the claimed victim in this case is: the United States of America, and in particular the U.S. Marshals service, whose Marshal and Deputies, with other back-up personnel were asked if they wanted to present a victim statement, but declined?

3. Do you admit that: by the silence of such officers of the "law", then the doctrine of Respondeat Superior can be allowed for their superior to answer, and as public servants that means their boss, meaning any of us citizens who pay them their salary, and that includes me as a taxpayer through my employer at work?

Thus as a "Victim" in the 2nd degree, and by Rule 32 (i) (4) (B) "Before imposing sentence, the court MUST address any victim of violence...who is present at sentencing and MUST permit the victim to speak or submit any information about the sentence...." (emphasis ADDed)

So in lieu of "submit"ting any information, as in "To yield or surrender (oneself) to the will or authority of another; give in", I "speak" the truth as a victim is described in my "The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973 @ page 771  as having been "tricked, swindled, or injured".  The answer is: swindled, as @ p. 700 to have been cheated or defrauded out of "lawful money", in that the U.S. Marshal REFUSEs to pay me the witness fee as transferred over to me: an uncalled witness on the list in this court case #2007-cr-0189 of The U.S.A. v. Daniel J. Riley & others, in violation of section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792 that the Marshall has taken an oath of office to honor, but disobeys! Furthermore citing his unlawful and illegal status since he or whoever for him has failed to file the required paperwork with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the "shall" word in N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. wherein our State Legislature and General Court gave "Consent" to the Feds way back on June 14, 1883 when this court was operating in both Exeter and Portsmouth on minor crimes before moving to Concord for to add major crimes, but which consent was "conditional" upon this filing that does not exist as evidenced by a copy of the gold-sealed certificate I gave to the Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Morse in the Ed Brown case with complaint to Washington still being investigated, as posted here at this forum.

Therefore too to add of "Accounts Receivable" to the Rule 32 (d) (2) "Additional Information" (A) (ii) "defendant's financial condition" to include a payment from me of exactly twenty-five ($25.00) dollars, to _______________ so as to activate a Seventh Amendment civil "trial by jury" if wanted by the defendant.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - -  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[keith in RI]

joe just called me and the sentening is over for bob and jason. he tells me bob got 30 months on each charge but not sure if it is concurrent or consecutive, and then supervised probation after that. and jason was sentenced to 72 months on count 1, counts 2 and 3 he received a sentence of 60 months each but they will run together but not with the time from count one. and on count four he received 108 months to run with both the first and second and third charges. that brings his total to 132 months which is 11 years! he is 22. i think you must do 85-90 percent of federal time as there is no parole and with the approximately 11 months hes already served he will probably get out in about 9-9 1/2 years from now..... he'll be about 32 years old.
   dannys sentencing was set for tommorow but we think it was delayed due to the courts ordering him to undergo a psych evaluation before he gets sent away for life!
  joe tells me jason read a statement in court saying that he was carrying out article 10 which wasnt only a right but required him to do something about it all and the judge hinted that treason is punishable by death saying the severe sentence was to promote respect of the law i believe, but like i said this is third hand info as i wasnt there........ maybe if someone else was actually there or joe when you get online you could retell the story??

[Coconut]

I've only very intermittently been following the case since the Browns' arrest. The man with 11 years, (by the way, that is heartbreaking) what did he do? Just provide weapons to Ed and Elaine? Thanks.

[error]

I suspect Jason really pissed them off, starting with that YouTube video.

[Dave Ridley]

what youtube video?  is it still up?

[error]

what youtube video?  is it still up?

Last year he got on YouTube and told all about how he was walking the dog and the feds jumped out of the woods and shot at him, then detained him, interrogated him and sent him away.

[JosephSHaas]

what youtube video?  is it still up?

Last year he got on YouTube and told all about how he was walking the dog and the feds jumped out of the woods and shot at him, then detained him, interrogated him and sent him away.

That was Danny, not Jason you're writing about.  Danny was the dog-walker.

As of 12:14 a.m. over at http://www.concordmonitor.com/ there's still no report by Margo of the day's events.

When I checked at 11:59 p.m. for Thu., July 31st and at 12:14 a.m. today (Fri. Aug. 1st) it still listed the "Brown supporter faces steep sentence" report of 12 a.m. midnight July 30-31; see:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080731/NEWS01/807310321

So as not to repeat what Margo writes about, I'll just say for now that I found it disgusting of what Judge Singal said from the bench of there NEEDing to be a "respect for the law". Me wanting to stand up and move toward the judge with a finger pointing at his face, yelling: yes! you bastard! Respect 18 USC 3232 you thief! My tax money is being illegally spent on sending these attorneys over to Maine in violation of the law!  Now WHO is a hypocrite!? You you dis-honorable good for nothing but to be impeached! black-robed tyrant!

After my call to Keith with the above numbers from him correct, I went over to Sen. Judd Gregg's office to "hound" his receptionist to relay by repeat the claim that he endorse my complaint in the subcommittee of the House Judiciary to look into this.  The end does NOT justify the means!  Those who say and do this crap are sociopaths! that I do NOT want my tax money to go to these outlaws!  To re-visit Gregg's office in Concord just NE of the Capitol in The Prescription Center Building, and let them have some more piece of my mind.

Anybody who would like to join me there or visit then re-visit too to get him to sign my complaint to start this investigation is most welcome to do so, and with your car please to park there too in one of the #___ number of spots to like book 'em up so that the landlord tells Gregg to do his job so that the complainers can free up his parking lot for his customers to get their prescriptions.  Teamwork, with synergy of us all together to make a difference! Then the REAL victims can have their attorneys motion for another trial for this violation of procedural due process of law.

Same goes for my complaint against the feds that I took to the Merrimack County Superior Court that they supposedly "removed" by a U.S. Code NOT enacted into positive law since it has never been activated in New Hampshire with their failure to file the necessary documents by N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. and so there being no "complete" public trial, as this member of the public was EXcluded for that part, and so to have a new trial based on this criteria too.

Also I met with Sven about Fed. Rep. Shea-Poprter to get back to me for WHO is responsible for filing these papers that WHEN done will prove NO jurisdictional authority back then and now, and so NEW evidence to motion for a new trial too.

Likewise for when Washington finally investigates the William Morse matter of this Assistant U.S. Attorney NOT providing the evidence of his copy of the certificate of non-filing to the judge as required by the shall word in that Rule too.

Plus to deal with the Assistant A.G.'s Motion to dismiss my Small Claims Court complaint against Gov. Lynch citing some state statutes but since when can they over-ride the const.!?  They can't. Art. 41 is in THE const. and makes the governor "responsible" and so accountable by the court process as the mechanism to provide even more new evidence for another trial, or at least to back up the attempted to I.D. document that Sven presented to Singal that he refused to mark into evidence for an exhibit for the jury to consider in their verdicts after Kinsella asked Reno if he tried any peaceful resolutions with the Marshals that Sven tried to expand to include the governor. Hopefully by Reno's Sentencing day of Fri., Sept. 26th some of these irons in the fire will burn red hot AGAINST this "Kangaroo Court" is what Jason told the judge in court yesterday.

Yours truly, - - Joe

P.S. "Brown ally sentenced to 20 years" posted sometime between 12:14 a.m. and 12:41 a.m., not the 12:00 a.m. as indicated over at:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080801/FRONTPAGE/808010304

[error]

Oops, you're right. Obviously I wasn't paying attention to Who's Who here... :\