• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Lauren's invitation for arrest Friday the 13th

Started by Tom Sawyer, May 13, 2011, 08:50 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

littlehawk

The Keene Pig Patrol. I'll be giving a few of these goons a call on Monday. I see our old friend Shane "Turd-eater" Maxwell still wears a nazi uniform.

603-357-9813 extensions are listed below


Kenneth Meola
Chief
7033

Steven Russo
Captain
7140

Peter Thomas
Captain
7011

Shane Maxfield
Lieutenant
7083


James Cemorelis
Prosecutor
7117
(ask this clown what he is going to prosecute)


The list of the Dicks:
Don Lundin
Detective
7172

Robert Collinsworth
Detective
7053

Michael Goodchild
Detective
7154

Jennifer Ramey
Detective
7158


The treasonist brownshirts who can' think for themselves:
Peter Bowers
Officer
7187

Thomas Byrne
Officer
7196

Lesley Collier
Officer
7198

Katie Corbett
Officer
7197

Steven Corrigan
Officer
7138

TJ Derendal
Officer
7151

Joshua English
Officer
7163

Matt Griffin
School Resource Officer
7182

Dan Hurley
Officer
7192

Mike Kopcha
Officer
7188

James Lamoureux
Officer
7171

Kyle Macie
Officer
7191

Fintan Moore
Officer
7121

Benjamin Nugent
Officer
7174

Michael O'Donnell
Officer
7178

Timothy Peloquin
Officer
7029

William Sargent
Officer
7085

Jason Short
Officer
7122

Chris Simonds
Officer
7180

Jonathan Stewart
College Liaison Officer
7084

Jason Thompson
Officer
7176

Bruce Uhas
Officer
7090

Elizabeth Uhas
Officer
7118

File charges against this fool?
Joseph Willis
Property Officer
7006

Collin Zamore
Officer
7186
   
 
Sheryl Beckta
Criminal Investigation Secretary
7137

Vacant
Special Services Secretary
   
Darlene Nash
Property Clerk
7136

Diane Theall
Records Manager
7013

Jeanette Casna
Records Secretary
7166

Pat Gagnon
Records Secretary
7165

Margo Best
Records Secretary
7181


Updated 03/25/11


Tom Sawyer

Jail visit prompts trespassing arrest

QuoteA Winchester woman was arrested Friday morning on charges of criminal trespassing at the Cheshire County jail, according to Keene police.
Lauren A. Canario, 54, had an active trespass letter against her barring her from going to the jail, according to Lt. Shane C. Maxfield. He said he did not know why the order was issued.

Canario went to the lobby of the jail around 11:30 a.m. She was arrested and released on $1,000 bail.

So is Maxfield lying or incompetent? After the stink that was made over all of the cops being at the jail for the Tress-passive Twelve

littlehawk

 

Another inaccurate report from Sentinel Source. I sent them a link to Lauren's vid so they can hear the nice invitation from brownshirt Willis.

Russell Kanning

that is what I was thinking Tom
"we just arrest people. we don't know why."
Someone from the jail must have called. So even if the guy who called didn't know anything, someone that it was important that Lauren be in chains. Then the police responded .... for some reason.

Knowaymr

I think this is just the progression of po-po laziness. All the fun of harassing activists....all the convenience of delivery. Next they'll expect you to show up pre handcuffed..... in under 30 minutes.... with doughnuts.

Tom Sawyer


highline

Quote from: MaineShark on May 14, 2011, 02:45 PM NHFT
I can't get the video to work right now, but this might be applicable, assuming the invitation was written...

Quote626:3 Effect of Ignorance or Mistake. –
    I. A person is not relieved of criminal liability because he acts under a mistaken belief of fact unless:
       (a) The mistake negatives the culpable mental state required for commission of the offense; or
       (b) The statute defining the offense expressly provides that such mistake is a defense; or
       (c) Such mistake supports a defense of justification as defined in RSA 627.
    II. A person is not relieved of criminal liability because he acts under a mistaken belief that his conduct does not, as a matter of law, constitute an offense unless his belief is founded upon a statement of the law contained in a statute or other enactment, or an administrative order or grant of permission, or a judicial decision of a state or federal court, or a written interpretation of the law relating to the offense officially made by a public servant, agency or body legally empowered with authority to administer, enforce or interpret such law. The defendant must prove a defense arising under this subsection by a preponderance of evidence.
[emphasis added]

Joe

Joe,

I think that 626:3 (I) (a) would apply...  as obviously II. wouldn't apply as it wasn't in writing.  The only time I've ever seen section II used in practicality was when I corrected an erroneous suspension of an individual's drivers license.  I just got off the phone with the DMV and they confirmed to me that they would be restoring the license immediately.  After checking the individuals drivers record I saw that the DMV still listed the license as suspended.  I wrote the individual a letter stating that his license was valid despite what the computer said.  I referenced 626:3 II. and said that I was a public servant able to enforce and interpret that law.  So the fellow got to drive away with his license showing that it was suspended in the computer.  I don't think he ever got stopped, but if he did, he would have been found not-guilty.

Section (I) (a) should apply to this situation as the voicemail coupled with the following conversation Lauren had with the jail would easily call into question whether or not Lauren could have acted "knowingly" to commit Criminal Trespass after being specifically requested to go to the jail.

Becky Thatcher

Quote from: Knowaymr on May 19, 2011, 09:28 AM NHFT
I think this is just the progression of po-po laziness. All the fun of harassing activists....all the convenience of delivery. Next they'll expect you to show up pre handcuffed..... in under 30 minutes.... with doughnuts.

What Tom said.  ;D ;D ;D 

littlehawk


Lloyd Danforth


Kat Kanning


Russell Kanning


MaineShark

Quote from: highline on May 19, 2011, 12:08 PM NHFTI think that 626:3 (I) (a) would apply...  as obviously II. wouldn't apply as it wasn't in writing.

Like I said, I couldn't get the video to work, so I didn't know how the "invitation" was made.

Quote from: highline on May 19, 2011, 12:08 PM NHFTThe only time I've ever seen section II used in practicality was when I corrected an erroneous suspension of an individual's drivers license.  I just got off the phone with the DMV and they confirmed to me that they would be restoring the license immediately.  After checking the individuals drivers record I saw that the DMV still listed the license as suspended.  I wrote the individual a letter stating that his license was valid despite what the computer said.  I referenced 626:3 II. and said that I was a public servant able to enforce and interpret that law.  So the fellow got to drive away with his license showing that it was suspended in the computer.  I don't think he ever got stopped, but if he did, he would have been found not-guilty.

I've seen it used with building code violation issues.  Just make sure to get it in writing, when the inspector says that XYZ meets code...

I believe there were some gun-related cases in Maine (which has an essentially-identical section in their statutes) where someone had written a letter to the AG asking for an opinion, and was later arrested as a result of following the AG's advice.

Joe

Tom Sawyer