Dilbert Author on Marijuana Fact Sheets

[RangerProbst]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

[Dreepa]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

[Lloyd Danforth]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

But!....But!... ..Then you'll run me over with your car!!

[RangerProbst]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

But!....But!... ..Then you'll run me over with your car!!

What if I only drive horses? Besides, I don't smoke. I just don't have a problem with other people doing it.

[Lloyd Danforth]

But!.....But!......People will get high and run me over with their horses!

[Tom Sawyer]

I remember the ad campaign that said that marijuana caused a train wreck... the engineer had been smoking pot and ran into another train.

They could have more accurately said that "watching the football game on TV, drinking beer, and smoking pot caused the train wreck."

[41mag]

But!.....But!......People will get high and run me over with their horses!

Better make sure that it's not Beth's attack horse.   

[Lloyd Danforth]

I remember the ad campaign that said that marijuana caused a train wreck... the engineer had been smoking pot and ran into another train.

They could have more accurately said that "watching the football game on TV, drinking beer, and smoking pot caused the train wreck."

I think I saw a statistic that football games cause 'way' more train wrecks than pot or,booze

[dalebert]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

That's great when you're preaching to the choir, but this article is actually addressing fallacies in the arguments of authoritarians which makes it useful if we actually hope to reach people who don't already agree with your statement. More specifically, it addresses the nature of bias and why people should not swallow everything they read/hear. It's a tool that can be used to teach people to think more independently.

[EJinCT]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

That's great when you're preaching to the choir, but this article is actually addressing fallacies in the arguments of authoritarians which makes it useful if we actually hope to reach people who don't already agree with your statement. More specifically, it addresses the nature of bias and why people should not swallow everything they read/hear. It's a tool that can be used to teach people to think more independently.

[RangerProbst]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

That's great when you're preaching to the choir, but this article is actually addressing fallacies in the arguments of authoritarians which makes it useful if we actually hope to reach people who don't already agree with your statement. More specifically, it addresses the nature of bias and why people should not swallow everything they read/hear. It's a tool that can be used to teach people to think more independently.

True. I let myself get irritated over the same regurgitated issue. I'm so bad.

[Lloyd Danforth]

Who cares about any of this? Let people do what they want. If you're against it, don't smoke it.

That's great when you're preaching to the choir, but this article is actually addressing fallacies in the arguments of authoritarians which makes it useful if we actually hope to reach people who don't already agree with your statement. More specifically, it addresses the nature of bias and why people should not swallow everything they read/hear. It's a tool that can be used to teach people to think more independently.

Well..........you posted it to the choir.

[RangerProbst]

Well..........you posted it to the choir.

Yeah, someone already pointed that out.