I'm starting a new forum.

[J’raxis 270145]

An observation: Why does the majority of strife seem to always come from the political types?

I think this is just a matter of one's own perception. The way I'm seeing it, the worst strife going on right now on this board is a result of Vitruvian's "Politics is an immoral dead-end" thread, and the Kannings' decision to toss politics off the board.

[Puke]

I think this is just a matter of one's own perception. The way I'm seeing it, the worst strife going on right now on this board is a result of Vitruvian's "Politics is an immoral dead-end" thread, and the Kannings' decision to toss politicals off the board.

Ahh, perception.
Maybe you are right. I don't know. Just a lot of crying going on all around.

[Kat Kanning]

Toss politicals off?  Have we made anyone leave over this (yet)?

[CNHT]

Are you suggesting that me calling you a racist on an Internet forum is the equivalent of me actually calling the Department of Justice on you?

Also, I'm sure many are wondering how exactly the agencies allegedly contacted you.  Do you have evidence of your claims?  Is the UN Agency for Discrimination a secret organization? Google returns no results for "UN Agency for Discrimination".

With malice and intention to waylay a discussion by attacking me, you created a whole new thread denigrating me because you could not discuss open/closed borders in a civilized way without pulling out the race card as ammunition. Your thread and its title suggested that me and my organization were dedicated to working against 'brown' people. It's a lousy tactic liberal politicians use, and I would have thought, beneath you, since you hate politics so much.

The result was continued surveillance by the DOJ to this day, and some other agency called the UN Commission on Human Rights or some such. (http://www.ohchr.org/english/) I may not have typed that one correctly originally.

Needless to say it was very upsetting at the time and I even went to Gardner about it. And it is the lowest tactic to use in a discussion especially when many consider ME to be a minority.

[FTL_Ian]

The result was continued surveillance by the DOJ to this day

Do you have proof of this claim?

Do you retract your allegation that it was I who called the DOJ on you?

Needless to say it was very upsetting at the time and I even went to Gardner about it. And it is the lowest tactic to use in a discussion especially when many consider ME to be a minority.

As you have said, we had resolved the issue of me calling you a racist.  I apologized.  You are not a racist.  You you do appear to be a bit of a paranoid loon, however.

[CNHT]

An observation: Why does the majority of strife seem to always come from the political types?

I think this is just a matter of one's own perception. The way I'm seeing it, the worst strife going on right now on this board is a result of Vitruvian's "Politics is an immoral dead-end" thread, and the Kannings' decision to toss politicals off the board.

And I think K&R will attest to the fact that I was not one who ever publicaly or privately complained about their announcement.

The problem arose when I made the mistake of telling a certain person I had done the evil deed of making myself a new website, which resulted in him having a hissy fit and vowing to trash me. This was beyond reason.



It really had nothing to do with K&R. I said it before and I'll say it again -- they have a right to make their board's purpose whatever they want.

[Puke]

You do appear to be a bit of a paranoid loon, however.

That's a new sub-forum.  

[CNHT]

As you have said, we had resolved the issue of me calling you a racist.  I apologized.  You are not a racist.  You you do appear to be a bit of a paranoid loon, however.

What you did caused something to happen that has to my knowledge never happened before.

And lo and behold, you still can't stop calling names, can you.

[FTL_Ian]

As you have said, we had resolved the issue of me calling you a racist.  I apologized.  You are not a racist.  You you do appear to be a bit of a paranoid loon, however.

What you did caused something to happen that has to my knowledge never happened before.

And lo and behold, you still can't stop calling names, can you.

You present no evidence beyond your paranoid claims.  Suggesting that I "caused" the DOJ to investigate you is a false allegation.  Will you retract your allegation, or not?

[CNHT]

As you have said, we had resolved the issue of me calling you a racist.  I apologized.  You are not a racist.  You you do appear to be a bit of a paranoid loon, however.

What you did caused something to happen that has to my knowledge never happened before.

And lo and behold, you still can't stop calling names, can you.

You present no evidence beyond your paranoid claims.  Suggesting that I "caused" the DOJ to investigate you is a false allegation.  Will you retract your allegation, or not?

We remain under surveillance to this day, so no. I'd say that was the cause since it never happened before then.

[Pat K]

You do appear to be a bit of a paranoid loon, however.

That's a new sub-forum.  

What! Just for paranoid Loons!
What about other paranoids?
You sir are discriminating!
I am calling the DOJ and the UN, also the ASPCA and Peta!!

[FTL_Ian]

We remain under surveillance to this day, so no.

Evidence?

[J’raxis 270145]

Toss politicals off?  Have we made anyone leave over this (yet)?

Oops. "Toss politics," I meant. Fixed in original comment.

[FTL_Ian]

We remain under surveillance to this day, so no. I'd say that was the cause since it never happened before then.

"Correlation proves causation" is a logical fallacy. 

[Puke]

I am calling the DOJ and the UN, also the ASPCA and Peta!!

Not PETA! I'll go to a PMIA Prison!