Russell Arrested 3/17/08

[RussellsEx]

Thank you for your understanding of my situation. I have truly come on this site, after being invited, to explain why Russell is where he is, and also to tell 'my side of the story'. I have done that to the best of my ability, as clearly as I can. I have since stopped my side of the dialogue, for the most part, due to rogue participants, who have called me a murderer, kidnapper, or 'lower than a child molester'. Since I do not know any of you, I am left being more than unsure about the stability of the guests here. To be fair, some of you have been incredibly kind, going out of your way, to not only hear me, but to respond with wonderful warm-heartedness about the travesty both Russell and I face, for different reasons. I have appreciated those of you who have really tried to be fairminded, and at least attempt to see that there might be another side. We do pray for resolution...and for peace.

[kola]

You said more than enough, Mindy.

its funny how you mention "resolution and peace"

hopefully thats your last line of bullshit that I have got to read.

good riddance to bad rubbish,
Kola

[coffeeseven]

Wow. Just wow!
Russell is in jail due to his past actions and his desire not to deal with the system.

Sugar coat it how you want. Russell is in jail for his ex-wife's unwillingness or inability to forgive.

I am certain even Russell would object to the treatment Mindy, the mother of his child, has received in this forum.

You may be right. He may not be at all like his ex has painted him. Are you a friend of his?

[karenijohnson]

peoplefinder.com
search returned the following for california state (sorry bad formatting) free search do it yourself...

NAME   AGE   PREVIOUS CITIES   DOB   PHONE   ADDRESS   INCOME   HOME VALUE   RELATIVES
1    MINDY C KANNING

View Details
   39
   HESPERIA, CA
CANYON COUNTRY, CA
VICTORVILLE, CA
VALENCIA, CA
SHOSHONE, CA   intelius.com
   intelius.com    
intelius.com
   intelius.com   intelius.com    
MINDY C KANNING
LOIS E KANNING
RUSSELL M KANNING
JEREMY K KANNING
KARL GEORGE KANNING
2    MINDY C KANNING

View Details
   40
   VICTORVILLE, CA   -
   -    
intelius.com
   intelius.com   intelius.com    MINDY C KANNING
RUSSELL M KANNING
LOIS E KANNING
3    MINDY KANNING

View Details
   -
   HESPERIA, CA   -
   intelius.com    
-
   intelius.com   intelius.com    MINDY KANNING

[karenijohnson]

from:
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
name search KANNING
//

Name Search Results
Party Name   Type   Case Name   Category   Case Number   Filed
KANNING, MINDY C     PETITIONER     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, MINDY      Protected Person     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, RUSSELL M     RESPONDENT     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, RUSSELL MARK     Restrained Person     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, RUSSELL MARK     Restrained Person     JOHN R MORRIS-N-RUSSELL MARK KANNING     Domestic Violence     VFLVS029409     04/01/2004 
KANNING, RUSSELL      DEFENDANT     WELLS FARGO BANK ET AL VS KANNING     Collections (ltd)     VCIVS027116     06/11/2002

[karenijohnson]

Name    Month/Year of Birth   Case Number   Filing Date   Count 1 Charge
KANNING, MINDAY COLLEEN    11/1968    AVP0334MK    06/14/2005    VC I22507.8(A)
KANNING, MINDY     11/1968    2196029MK    07/30/2004    VC I27315(D)
KANNING, MINDY     11/1968    2027042MK    03/12/2002    VC I22351(A)
KANNING, MINDY C    11/1968    1775930MK    10/20/2000    VC I22352(B)(1)
KANNING, MINDY COLLEEN    11/1968    2026005MK    10/28/2002    VC I22350
KANNING, MINDY COLLEEN    11/1968    2338984MK    04/05/2005    VC I22350
KANNING, MINDY COLLEEN    11/1968    88928UVMK    06/16/2005    VC I22356B

(these are VEHICLE CODE VIOLATIONS)

[karenijohnson]

FAMILY law case info Case VFLVS020706 - MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING
http://170.164.31.10/openaccess/civil/civildetails.asp?courtcode=X&casenumber=VS020706&casetype=VFL&mcnmsearch=Y&dsn=

//
Case VFLVS020706 - MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING
 
Viewed    Date    Action Text    Disposition    Image
     07/13/2006     CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DCSS (3 EA CERT OAHG)      Not Applicable      
     06/22/2006     CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DCSS (3 EA CERT OAHG)      Not Applicable      
     04/27/2006     3 CERT COPIES OF 1/9/01 MM SENT TO DCSS      Not Applicable      
     04/28/2004     RESTRAINING ORDERS ENTERED INTO CLETS.     Not Applicable      
     04/28/2004     RESTRAINING ORDER AFTER HEARING (CLETS) FILED. HEARING DATE: 04/28/04. ORDER EXPIRES: 04/28/07.      Not Applicable      
     04/28/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. V11     HEARING ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FILED BY MINDY KANNING - Minutes     Action Dispo: Complete      
     04/26/2004     PROOF OF SERVICE OF RESTRAINING ORDERS ENTERED INTO CLETS     Not Applicable      
     04/26/2004     POS SENT TO DEPT V11 FOR HRG      Not Applicable      
     04/26/2004     PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON RUSSELL MARK KANNING; PARTY SERVED ON 04/22/04. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL.      Not Applicable      
     04/22/2004     ATTEMPTED POS SENT TO DEPT V11 FOR HRG      Not Applicable      
     04/22/2004     AFFIDAVIT OF ATTEMPTED PERSONAL SERVICE ON RUSSELL MARK KANNING FILED ON 04/22/04.      Not Applicable      
     04/08/2004     1 ABSTRACTS OF JUDGMENT ISSUED.      Not Applicable      
     04/08/2004     RESTRAINING ORDERS ENTERED INTO CLETS.     Not Applicable      
     04/08/2004     TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING (DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION)FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable      
     04/08/2004 8:15 AM DEPT. V11X     EX-PARTE HEARING RE:TEMPORARY ORDERS (DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION)REQUEST FILED BY MINDY KANNING - Minutes     Action Dispo: Complete      
     04/06/2004     REQ/ORD FOR FREE SVC OF REST ORD * FILED.      Not Applicable      
     04/06/2004     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF FEES & COSTS OF MINDY C KANNING IS GRA.      GRANTED      
     04/06/2004     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES & COSTS FILED BY MINDY C KANNING.            
     04/06/2004     SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FILED ON PETITION OF MINDY KANNING BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable      
     04/24/2003     ORDER AFTER HEARING FILED. HEARING DATE 04/07/03 IN DEPT V11.      Not Applicable      
     04/10/2003     1 ABSTRACTS OF JUDGMENT ISSUED.      Not Applicable      
     04/07/2003 8:30 AM DEPT. VDA     ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOD OF MEDICAL SUPPORT (121602) FILED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. - Minutes     Action Dispo: Complete      
     02/25/2003     NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF OSC TO EST MEDICAL FILED.      Not Applicable      
     02/25/2003     NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF OSC TO EST MEDICAL FILED.      Not Applicable      
     02/24/2003 8:30 AM DEPT. VDA     ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOD OF MEDICAL SUPPORT (121602) FILED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. - Minutes     Continued      
     12/16/2002     OSC RE: MOD OF MEDICAL SUPPORT (121602) FILED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO      Not Applicable      
     12/16/2002     ON THE PETITION OF MINDY KANNING, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IS ADDED AS A THIRD PARTY.      Not Applicable      
     06/12/2002     NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT -- DATE MARITAL STATUS TERMINATES 08/18/02.      Action Dispo: Judgment      
     06/10/2002     JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION BY DEFAULT FILED 05/31/02      Not Applicable      
     06/07/2002     CASE SENT TO VICKI- V11- COMM PROULX FOR SIGNATURE ON JUDGMENT *      Not Applicable      
     06/07/2002     DECLARATION FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED DISSOLUTION FILED     Not Applicable      
     06/05/2002     JUDGMENT IS RETURNED BY COURT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): NEEDS TO BE NOTARIZED BY BOTH PARTIES *      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     DEFAULT ENTERED ON 1ST AMENDED PETITION OF MINDY KANNING AS TO RUSSELL M KANNING.      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     REQUEST TO ENTER DEFAULT AGAINST RUSSELL M KANNING FILED.      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     DECLARATION RE: SERVICE OF DECL OF DISCLOSURE AND IE FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     COMMUNITY AND QUASI COMMUNITY PROPERTY DECLARATION OF MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     PROOF OF SERVICE OF PROP DECL, IE BY MAIL ON 05/31/02 AS TO RUSSELL KENNING, FILED.      Not Applicable      
     05/31/2002     DEFAULT PACKET RECEIVED     Not Applicable      
     05/06/2002     NOTICE RE: PAYMENT OF SUPPORT FILED.     Not Applicable      
     03/19/2002     COMPLETED CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO V.V CHILD SUPPORT      Not Applicable      
     03/07/2002     RECEIVED CORRESPONDENCE FROM V.V CHILD SUPPORT      Not Applicable      
     03/07/2002     COMPLETED CORRESPONDENCE RETURNED TO DEPT OF CHILD SPPRT SERVICES FILED.      Not Applicable      
     02/26/2002     PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON RUSSELL M KANNING; PARTY SERVED ON 02/16/02. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL.      Not Applicable      
     02/15/2002     AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED AND** * FILED.      Not Applicable      
     02/15/2002     AMENDED FAMILY LAW PETITION FILED. - AMENDING 1ST AMENDED PETITION OF MINDY KANNING      Not Applicable      
     01/09/2001 8:30 AM DEPT. V11     ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: C/C,C/S,A/F,V (121200) FILED BY MINDY C KANNING. - Minutes     Action Dispo: Complete      
     12/12/2000     ORIGINAL SUMMONS RETURNED AND FILED.     Not Applicable      
     12/12/2000     ORDER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENT OF COURT FEES OR COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $246.00 FILED      Not Applicable      
     12/12/2000     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF FEES & COSTS OF MINDY C KANNING IS PAR.      Partial Grant      

Next 50   

[karenijohnson]

FAMILY law case with early Support order KANNING v. KANNING

http://170.164.31.10/openaccess/civil/casereport.asp?casenumber=VS020706&courtcode=X&casetype=VFL&dsn=

//
EXCERPT:
RUSSELL M KANNING IS ORDERED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1052.00 EACH MONTH. 
    PAYABLE ONE-HALF ON THE 1ST AND ONE-HALF ON THE 15TH DAYS OF EACH MONTH, COMMENCING 12/12/00 AND CONTINUING UNTIL EACH CHILD DIES, MARRIES, BECOMES EMANCIPATED, REACHES THE AGE OF 18 OR REACHES THE AG 
    E OF 19 AND IS A FULL-TIME HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT, OR UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT, WHICHEVER FIRST OCCURS.
    SUPPORT PAYMENTS ORDERED PAID BY WAGE ASSIGNMENT.
//
Case VFLVS020706 - MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING


Case VFLVS020706 - Complaints/Parties
Complaint Number:    1
Complaint Type:    PETITION
Filing Date:    12/08/2000
Complaint Status:    Judgment Entered 06/12/2002


Party Number    Party Type    Party Name    Attorney    Party Status
1    PETITIONER    MINDY C KANNING     FRIAS, MARIA A    JUDGMENT 06/12/2002
2    RESPONDENT    RUSSELL M KANNING     Unrepresented   JUDGMENT 06/12/2002
3    THIRD PARTY    THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO    DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES    Serve Required (WaitS)
Complaint Number:    2
Complaint Type:    Request (Domestic Violence Prevention)
Filing Date:    04/06/2004
Complaint Status:    ACTIVE


Party Number    Party Type    Party Name    Attorney    Party Status
4    Protected Person    MINDY KANNING     Pro Per   
5    Restrained Person    RUSSELL MARK KANNING     Unrepresented   Served 04/22/2004



Case VFLVS020706 - Actions/Minutes
Viewed    Date    Action Text    Disposition
     07/13/2006     CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DCSS (3 EA CERT OAHG)      Not Applicable 
     06/22/2006     CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DCSS (3 EA CERT OAHG)      Not Applicable 
     04/27/2006     3 CERT COPIES OF 1/9/01 MM SENT TO DCSS      Not Applicable 
     04/28/2004     RESTRAINING ORDER AFTER HEARING (CLETS) FILED. HEARING DATE: 04/28/04. ORDER EXPIRES: 04/28/07.      Not Applicable 
     04/28/2004     RESTRAINING ORDERS ENTERED INTO CLETS.     Not Applicable 
     04/28/2004 8:30 AM DEPT. V11     HEARING ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FILED BY MINDY KANNING      Action Dispo: Complete 
    Minutes
     DAVID R PROULX PRESIDING 
    CLERK: VICKY GAITAN 
    REPORTER: VICTORIA VILLEGAS 
    BAILIFF: PATRICIA BUSH 
    PETITIONER MINDY C KANNING PRESENT 
    PARTIES NOT PRESENT: RUSSELL M KANNING 
    -
    PROCEEDINGS:
    PARTIES ADVISED RE:COMMISSIONER/ATTORNEY PRO TEM; NO OBJECTION RAISED. FAILURE TO OBJECT IS DEEMED A STIPULATION TO COMMISSIONER/ATTORNEY PRO TEM SITTING AS JUDGE PRO TEM.
    STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF JUDGE PRO TEM FILED.
    WITNESS -- MINDY KANNING IS SWORN AND EXAMINED. 
    -
    COURT FINDS:
     THE COURT ORDERS THAT THE TEMPORARY ORDERS MADE ON 4/8/04 ARE MADE PERMANENT ORDERS OF THE COURT 
     AND ARE TO BE IN EFFECT FOR 3 YEARS FROM TODAYS DATE 
    THIS ORDER SHALL EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT ON 04/28/07 
    ACTION - COMPLETE
    === MINUTE ORDER END ===
     04/26/2004     PROOF OF SERVICE OF RESTRAINING ORDERS ENTERED INTO CLETS     Not Applicable 
     04/26/2004     POS SENT TO DEPT V11 FOR HRG      Not Applicable 
     04/26/2004     PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON RUSSELL MARK KANNING; PARTY SERVED ON 04/22/04. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL.      Not Applicable 
     04/22/2004     ATTEMPTED POS SENT TO DEPT V11 FOR HRG      Not Applicable 
     04/22/2004     AFFIDAVIT OF ATTEMPTED PERSONAL SERVICE ON RUSSELL MARK KANNING FILED ON 04/22/04.      Not Applicable 
     04/08/2004     1 ABSTRACTS OF JUDGMENT ISSUED.      Not Applicable 
     04/08/2004     TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING (DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION)FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     04/08/2004     RESTRAINING ORDERS ENTERED INTO CLETS.     Not Applicable 
     04/08/2004 8:15 AM DEPT. V11X     EX-PARTE HEARING RE:TEMPORARY ORDERS (DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION)REQUEST FILED BY MINDY KANNING      Action Dispo: Complete 
    Minutes
     DAVID R PROULX PRESIDING 
    CLERK: REBECCA NAJAR 
    NOT REPORTED
    PLAINTIFF MINDY C KANNING PRESENT 
    PARTIES NOT PRESENT: RUSSELL M KANNING 
    -
    PROCEEDINGS:
    EX-PARTE HEARING IS HELD.
    EX PARTE ORDERS GRANTED 
    EX PARTE ORDER SIGNED BY THE COURT.
    DECLARATION RE: 4 HOUR NOTICE FILED.
    ACTION - COMPLETE
    === MINUTE ORDER END ===
     04/06/2004     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES & COSTS FILED BY MINDY C KANNING.       
     04/06/2004     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF FEES & COSTS OF MINDY C KANNING IS GRA.      GRANTED 
     04/06/2004     REQ/ORD FOR FREE SVC OF REST ORD * FILED.      Not Applicable 
     04/06/2004     SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FILED ON PETITION OF MINDY KANNING BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     04/24/2003     ORDER AFTER HEARING FILED. HEARING DATE 04/07/03 IN DEPT V11.      Not Applicable 
     04/10/2003     1 ABSTRACTS OF JUDGMENT ISSUED.      Not Applicable 
     04/07/2003 8:30 AM DEPT. VDA     ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOD OF MEDICAL SUPPORT (121602) FILED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.      Action Dispo: Complete 
    Minutes
     DAVID R PROULX PRESIDING 
    CLERK: VICKY GAITAN 
    REPORTER: WENDY LUCERO 
    ATTORNEY SUSIE SATO PRESENT FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION. 
    PARTIES NOT PRESENT: MINDY C KANNING, RUSSELL M KANNING 
    -
    PROCEEDINGS:
    ORAL REPORT GIVEN BY SUSIE SATO. 
     THE COURT ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DCSS WORKSHEET (SEE ATTACHED). 
    ACTION - COMPLETE
    === MINUTE ORDER END ===
     02/25/2003     NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF OSC TO EST MEDICAL FILED.      Not Applicable 
     02/25/2003     NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF OSC TO EST MEDICAL FILED.      Not Applicable 
     02/24/2003 8:30 AM DEPT. VDA     ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: MOD OF MEDICAL SUPPORT (121602) FILED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.      Continued 
    Minutes
     DAVID R PROULX PRESIDING 
    CLERK: VICKY GAITAN 
    NOT REPORTED
    ATTORNEY MARY LANGEVIN PRESENT FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION. 
    PARTIES NOT PRESENT: MINDY C KANNING, RUSSELL M KANNING 
    -
    HEARINGS:
    CURRENT HEARING CONTINUED TO 04/07/03 AT 08:30 IN DEPARTMENT VDA. 
    NOTICE TO BE GIVEN BY DCSS. 
    ACTION - COMPLETE
    === MINUTE ORDER END ===
     12/16/2002     ON THE PETITION OF MINDY KANNING, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO IS ADDED AS A THIRD PARTY.      Not Applicable 
     12/16/2002     OSC RE: MOD OF MEDICAL SUPPORT (121602) FILED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO      Not Applicable 
     06/12/2002     NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT -- DATE MARITAL STATUS TERMINATES 08/18/02.      Action Dispo: Judgment 
    Minutes
    FAMILY LAW JUDGMENT ENTERED
    STAGE AT DISPOSITION: ALL OTHER JUDGMENTS BEFORE TRIAL.
    CASE DISPOSITIONED BY JUDGMENT FILING.
     06/10/2002     JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION BY DEFAULT FILED 05/31/02      Not Applicable 
     06/07/2002     DECLARATION FOR DEFAULT OR UNCONTESTED DISSOLUTION FILED     Not Applicable 
     06/07/2002     CASE SENT TO VICKI- V11- COMM PROULX FOR SIGNATURE ON JUDGMENT *      Not Applicable 
     06/05/2002     JUDGMENT IS RETURNED BY COURT FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): NEEDS TO BE NOTARIZED BY BOTH PARTIES *      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     REQUEST TO ENTER DEFAULT AGAINST RUSSELL M KANNING FILED.      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     DEFAULT ENTERED ON 1ST AMENDED PETITION OF MINDY KANNING AS TO RUSSELL M KANNING.      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     COMMUNITY AND QUASI COMMUNITY PROPERTY DECLARATION OF MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     DECLARATION RE: SERVICE OF DECL OF DISCLOSURE AND IE FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     PROOF OF SERVICE OF PROP DECL, IE BY MAIL ON 05/31/02 AS TO RUSSELL KENNING, FILED.      Not Applicable 
     05/31/2002     DEFAULT PACKET RECEIVED     Not Applicable 
     05/06/2002     NOTICE RE: PAYMENT OF SUPPORT FILED.     Not Applicable 
     03/19/2002     COMPLETED CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO V.V CHILD SUPPORT      Not Applicable 
     03/07/2002     RECEIVED CORRESPONDENCE FROM V.V CHILD SUPPORT      Not Applicable 
     03/07/2002     COMPLETED CORRESPONDENCE RETURNED TO DEPT OF CHILD SPPRT SERVICES FILED.      Not Applicable 
     02/26/2002     PROOF OF SERVICE FILED ON RUSSELL M KANNING; PARTY SERVED ON 02/16/02. TYPE OF SERVICE IS PERSONAL.      Not Applicable 
     02/15/2002     AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED AND** * FILED.      Not Applicable 
     02/15/2002     AMENDED FAMILY LAW PETITION FILED. - AMENDING 1ST AMENDED PETITION OF MINDY KANNING      Not Applicable 
     01/09/2001 8:30 AM DEPT. V11     ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: C/C,C/S,A/F,V (121200) FILED BY MINDY C KANNING.      Action Dispo: Complete 
    Minutes
     DAVID R PROULX PRESIDING 
    CLERK: KRISTIN WATSON 
    BAILIFF: LARRY FRYE 
    REPORTER: VICTORIA VILLEGAS 
    ATTORNEY MARIA FRIAS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER. 
    PARTIES NOT PRESENT: MINDY C KANNING, RUSSELL M KANNING 
    -
    HEARINGS:
     AMENDED INCOME & EXPENSE DEC OF MINDY KANNING FILED. 
    PARTIES ADVISED RE:COMMISSIONER/ATTORNEY PRO TEM; NO OBJECTION RAISED. FAILURE TO OBJECT IS DEEMED A STIPULATION TO COMMISSIONER/ATTORNEY PRO TEM SITTING AS JUDGE PRO TEM.
    STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF JUDGE PRO TEM FILED.
    RUSSELL M KANNING IS ORDERED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1260.00 EACH MONTH. 
    PAYABLE ONE-HALF ON THE 1ST AND ONE-HALF ON THE 15TH DAYS OF EACH MONTH, COMMENCING 01/15/01 AND CONTINUING UNTIL EACH CHILD DIES, MARRIES, BECOMES EMANCIPATED, REACHES THE AGE OF 18 OR REACHES THE AG 
    E OF 19 AND IS A FULL-TIME HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT, OR UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT, WHICHEVER FIRST OCCURS.
    SUPPORT PAYMENTS ORDERED PAID BY WAGE ASSIGNMENT.
    ACTION - COMPLETE
    === MINUTE ORDER END ===
     12/12/2000     ORIGINAL SUMMONS RETURNED AND FILED.     Not Applicable 
     12/12/2000     ORDER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENT OF COURT FEES OR COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $246.00 FILED      Not Applicable 
     12/12/2000     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF FEES & COSTS OF MINDY C KANNING IS PAR.      Partial Grant 
     12/12/2000     OSC RE: C/C,C/S,A/F,V (121200) FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     12/12/2000 8:15 AM DEPT. V11X     EX-PARTE MOTION RE: CC, CS, V, AF,      Action Dispo: Complete 
    Minutes
     DAVID R PROULX PRESIDING 
    CLERK: KRISTIN WATSON 
    BAILIFF: LARRY FRYE 
    NOT REPORTED
    ATTORNEY MARIA FRIAS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER. 
    -
    HEARINGS:
    DECLARATION RE: 4 HOUR NOTICE FILED.
    EX-PARTE HEARING IS HELD.
    TEMPORARY ORDERS ARE MADE ON PETITIONER'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FILED THIS DATE. 
    RUSSELL M KANNING IS ORDERED TO PAY CHILD SUPPORT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1052.00 EACH MONTH. 
    PAYABLE ONE-HALF ON THE 1ST AND ONE-HALF ON THE 15TH DAYS OF EACH MONTH, COMMENCING 12/12/00 AND CONTINUING UNTIL EACH CHILD DIES, MARRIES, BECOMES EMANCIPATED, REACHES THE AGE OF 18 OR REACHES THE AG 
    E OF 19 AND IS A FULL-TIME HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT, OR UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT, WHICHEVER FIRST OCCURS.
    SUPPORT PAYMENTS ORDERED PAID BY WAGE ASSIGNMENT.
    SUPPORT FINDINGS ARE SET FORTH ON THE COMPUTER PRINTOUT ATTACHED.
     THIS ORDER MADE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 
     OSC DATE OF 1-3-01 CHANGED TO 1-9-01. 
    ACTION - COMPLETE
    === MINUTE ORDER END ===
     12/08/2000     INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION FILED BY MINDY C KANNING      Not Applicable 
     12/08/2000     PETITION AND PARTY INFORMATION ENTERED (CIVIL)     Not Applicable 
     12/08/2000     APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES & COSTS FILED BY MINDY C KANNING.       





Case VFLVS020706 - Pending Hearings
Date    Action Text    Disposition
This Case Does Not Have Any Pending Hearings

[Caleb]

Karen, I deleted your post on the other thread. Nothing personal, but that other thread is sort of a refuge for Kat, who is, we can all agree, certainly an innocent party here. And I don't think Kat wants to sort through a bunch of legal information on the history of the dispute. It's perfectly fine in this thread though.  I just wanted to explain to you so you don't get offended. 

To everyone else, can we please tone down the rhetoric here? It is conceivable that Russell's children might possibly come on this forum and read this thread. After all, if they google searched "Russell Kanning" it wouldn't take them long to find this forum. I don't think it's appropriate to refer to their father as a deadbeat nor their mother as a murderer. Thank you.

[Caleb]

Mindy did not put Russell in jail. She did not coerce Russell into accepting the terms of agreement that the state imposed.

This is not about the state nor political philosophy, Russell signed the contractual obligation.

Just as a point of technical correction, no he didn't sign any agreement. As Russell and Mindy have both said, and as others who were present at the time have verified, Russell did not show up for the hearings or play ball with the law at all. He didn't believe the state had jurisdiction over his marriage.

On that everyone is agreed.

This is really the problem with divorce in general. Of course, I'm coming at this from a strictly Christian perspective, but marriages were never meant to be dissolved in the first place. So when divorce happens, there's lots of loose ends and ambiguity and things that need to be wrapped up. I mean, think about it, when you get a divorce you are untying two entire lives that have been tied together. Financially, personally, everything that was together is now separated. And you've got friends, family, creditors, etc. These things don't just go away, just because the marriage ends, and it gets sticky sorting through everything. It's just sad. Really sad. I keep seeing all these marriages ending on this forum in recent weeks, and with Russell's situation, I don't know. It brings back a lot of memories of my own and a lot of feelings of sadness. 

I really, really, really, really, really wish that this had been sorted out by Russell and Mindy's church at the time, but unfortunately, churches rarely take the lead in sorting through these things, just letting the state take the reins and run with it, and that's sad, because the state doesn't care about anyone. It's just a bunch of policies and procedures and bureaucracy.

[Caleb]

Just as a point of technical correction, no he didn't sign any agreement.

Uhhhh, the marriage was an agreement with the state (not to mention the adoptions), and he had every chance to argue his side in court for the dissolution, but he chose not to.

You've got a better case arguing that the adoptions were an agreement with the state as far as I'm concerned. At least with me. I'm a Christian, so I'm biased I guess, but I believe that marriage is an agreement between two people, sealed by God. God, in my opinion, outranks your state, so if they attempt to intervene they are guilty of what Jesus said, "what God has yoked together, let no man put apart." You can't legislate God away. He is the source of you.

Like I said, the personal attacks need to stop. Last warning, then I start deleting. That goes for both dad and mom. No attacks on either of them. This is getting ridiculous and out of hand.

[coffeeseven]

I do not know what libertarian theory or non-aggression principle you are working off of, but we always take care of our own. Always!

So do I. I just don't support dressed up alimony.

Here's the principle I'm working off. Being a sum of my experiences as a father and being divorced from a woman that makes a decent living but still demands tribute. Her agent, the state (force) demands a flat (50%?) amount regardless whether a person can pay it or not. Bleed that turnip. When it's dry you can have the turnip put in jail and claim it's the turnip's fault. Nice racket.

[FreelanceFreedomFighter]

Just wanted to thank karenijohnson for the rundown and info that is public record in CA...

I do have a question on one part though:

from:
http://www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/courts/genInfo/openaccess.htm
name search KANNING
//

Name Search Results
Party Name   Type   Case Name   Category   Case Number   Filed
KANNING, MINDY C     PETITIONER     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, MINDY      Protected Person     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, RUSSELL M     RESPONDENT     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, RUSSELL MARK     Restrained Person     MINDY C KANNING V RUSSELL M KANNING     LEGAL SEPARATION     VFLVS020706     12/08/2000 
KANNING, RUSSELL MARK     Restrained Person     JOHN R MORRIS-N-RUSSELL MARK KANNING     Domestic Violence     VFLVS029409     04/01/2004 
KANNING, RUSSELL      DEFENDANT     WELLS FARGO BANK ET AL VS KANNING     Collections (ltd)     VCIVS027116     06/11/2002

This appears to me that there was a TRO filed as part of the initial separation and a second one filled almost 2 years after the divorce was final on 8/18/02 for "Domestic Violence". Is that true? If so, was the initial one requested or just SOP with the filing of a separation in CA? (It varies from state to state, but more and more are now only doing so if requested, not for a separation.) Just wondering...

[FreelanceFreedomFighter]

I'm a Christian, so I'm biased I guess, but I believe that marriage is an agreement between two people, sealed by God. God, in my opinion, outranks your state, so if they attempt to intervene they are guilty of what Jesus said, "what God has yoked together, let no man put apart." You can't legislate God away. He is the source of you.

I am as well... and I agree with you on this. However, most churches do not get into the dissolution of marital assets or the issues of support for the children. They (most churches) leave those things up to the state's courts (perhaps to keep their own hands from getting dirty over it) and only deal with the religious dissolution of the marriage through annulment or similar action for cause. Unlike states that generally grant "no fault" divorces, most churches will only grant an annulment "for cause"... supported by witnesses and affirmation. I'm not saying that I necessarily agree with that state of affairs, simply that it is the state of affairs, where the state has become involved in all of our private affairs! 

And one of the main reasons why we fight for freedom is because, as you so eloquently put it, "God, in my opinion, outranks your state". So true... so very true...

[FreelanceFreedomFighter]

I just don't support dressed up alimony.

Child support and alimony are two different things. Alimony is tax deductible, child support is not. Alimony is for the spouse, child support is for the children. Alimony is "whatever the demanding spouse's lawyer can get out of the hide of the paying spouse", child support is based on a supposedly strict set of guidelines that are supposedly applied the same nationwide. Alimony almost always stops at "remarriage", child support stops at "emancipation" of the child(ren).

Regardless of the supposed strict guidelines for child support payment calculations, there are judges who routinely ignore them and that happens more and more because the plaintiff's attorney is well-connected with the judge/court. Also, the "right" well-connected attorney with the "right" easily bribed, bought, "swayed" judge can "fudge" the numbers in all manner of ways.

(I didn't say it was fair, just stating the system as I see it...)

Here's the principle I'm working off. Being a sum of my experiences as a father and being divorced from a woman that makes a decent living but still demands tribute. Her agent, the state (force) demands a flat (50%?) amount regardless whether a person can pay it or not. Bleed that turnip. When it's dry you can have the turnip put in jail and claim it's the turnip's fault. Nice racket.

In far too many instances, that's the way the non-custodial parent (regardless of gender) is setup treated. I notice from the info posted by karenijohnson that the initial child support order was ~$245/wk, but then (within a week or so) was bumped up to ~293/wk. Makes one wonder what the cause was for the nearly $50 increase. Usually (but not always as stated previously) the child support amount is based on the incomes of the two parents and that amount is usually known right off.