2 hour long video about bloodlines, government agendas, etc!

[Raineyrocks]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6030443037963555139     This is very  interesting historically but long!


Esoteric Agenda - 126 min  - Apr 11, 2008

(693 Ratings)  Rate:

This is a great video cover all the major information most people don't realize is going on in the world!



Even if you know what's going on in the world I still learned some new stuff on this video.  It's more of a historical video about symbols, bloodlines, etc.
   

[John Edward Mercier]

So who's the next POTUS? With all the inside information they should be able to list the next halve dozen or so for us.

[Raineyrocks]

So who's the next POTUS? With all the inside information they should be able to list the next halve dozen or so for us.

What's POTUS?   Also I'm just curious why your posts seem so negative to almost everything I post, then I ask you a question and you never reply.

[John Edward Mercier]

POTUS is President of the United States...

I'm doing several things at once, so I'm on site and off.

Didn't see any information on Obama, McCain, Barr, etc...
I know at one time a theory was formed that the Kennedy's would hold the presidency for multiple generations... but things didn't work out. I was watching the theory on a continuation of the Bush legacy, but Jeb is no where to be seen. But had it went Bush-Clinton-Bush- then Clinton... maybe Jeb will run for the next election cycle if Obama wins.

Also during the administrations that a President has served the maximum... the VP then campaigns for the position. But this time Cheney didn't. Not saying something was planned, but seems rather odd to me.
So they might have at least a good theory on these quirks and what they mean.

[ReverendRyan]

OK seriously, he opens with 2012, Nostradamus, etc, and actually expects people to take him seriously. No thanks.

[K. Darien Freeheart]

I had to force myself to watch Sam's video and it was half an hour long.

Personally, I find those consipiracy things depressing. Government people, in my mind, are violent thugs. They're inept (which is why they fail), they're stupid (which is why they fail), they're slow to respond.

Conspiracy theories rely on the notion that governmnet people are skilled at... well, anything. The only reason in my eyes the government people are "scary" is because billions of people around the world think government people have "authority". If those same government people actually had the capacity to organize a secret bloodline to control the nation... Or had a multi-decade plan to control the "New World Order" or even had the wits to regulate something a decade before it had already become pointless then I'd actually be afraid.

The govenrment people are stuck by the bureacracy of the government system. You can't have "efficient" with that system (works both ways - no "proprams" to help people will help people and no plans to dominate the world will work).

Believe in government is a social issue. It can only be addressed by breaking down the their aura of legitimacy by disobeying and creating alternative services that will get people to break the government tether. There are no men behind the curtain...

[Porcupine_in_MA]

There are no men behind the curtain...

And even if there were, they would be government men behind the curtain so they would end up getting themselves wrapped up in said curtain.

[John Edward Mercier]

Certain questions still remain.

I find it difficult to adjust in my mind why Cheney would be chosen VP for the second term.
When was the last time a VP did not campaign for election after the original admin?

[Sam A. Robrin]

OK, he opens with Nostradamus and actually expects people to take him seriously. No thanks.

Well, I'm sure in no position to cast a first stone, am I?

[ReverendRyan]

OK, he opens with Nostradamus and actually expects people to take him seriously. No thanks.

Well, I'm sure in no position to cast a first stone, am I?

No, but you're the first to intentionally misquote me.

[Sam A. Robrin]

OK, he opens with Nostradamus and actually expects people to take him seriously. No thanks.

Well, I'm sure in no position to cast a first stone, am I?

No, but you're the first to intentionally misquote me.

Not misquoted--edited.  To emphasize the salient point.  No offense intended.  Sorry if such was the result.

[Raineyrocks]

I am so confused now!

[Sam A. Robrin]

I am so confused now!

By what I posted?  (Like that's anything new . . .)
Google my user name as one word.  Though from a source I'd ordinarily eschew, it was too appropriate to resist!

[Raineyrocks]

I am so confused now!

By what I posted?  (Like that's anything new . . .)
Google my user name as one word.  Though from a source I'd ordinarily eschew, it was too appropriate to resist!

I think so but now you changed it, right?   Now though I'm confused about googling your name as one word, do you mean like Samarbobrin?  What would I find if I'm right and google Samarbobrin?