Legal Land is a maddening rabbithole that is of course nothing more than a cover for violence, but let's play in their world for a moment.
Everyone thinks they know what a "person" is. It's a "human being" according to dictionary.com. That's the english definition.
Here's their (legalese) definitions, from Black's Law 2nd Ed:
Person:
A man considered according to the rank he holds in society.
This is a long way from "human being"! Don't stop at just one definition, though. Dig deeper.
Man:
Male of the human species above the age of puberty.
Consideration: (Black's doesn't have the tense "considered")
The inducement to a contract. The cause, motive, price, or impelling influence which induces a contracting party to enter into a contract
Considered in regular english means "carefully weighed".
According:
In practice. To agree or concur...
Rank:
The order or place in which certain officers are placed...
Society:
An association or company of persons (generally not incorporated) united together for any mutual or common purpose.
Association:
The act of a number of persons who unite or join together for some special purpose or business. An unincorporated society; a body of persons united and acting together without a charter but upon the methods and forms used by incorporated bodies for the prosecution of some common enterprise.
Ugh. That's enough of that. Dig on if you wish.
Draw your own conclusions, but I think it's safe to say "person" has a drastically different meaning to the legal land people than it does to most of us. All of their "statutes" apply to "persons". Things that make you go, hmm...
So, my translation of the legalese "person": "A human being, carefully weighed according to the rank he holds in society - an association he is either held in by his consent, ignorance, or men with guns."
What about that rank in society part? You don't remember becoming an officer in the government, do you? If not, it must be the "person" they created when your parents got your birth certificate. We just unwittingly respond as the "person" when govt people attempt to interact or
contract with us. "Are you FIRSTNAME LASTNAME? What's your Date of Birth?" Most people just answer with the info they've been trained to answer with, and they've created "joinder" with the "person". (At least, those are the allegations as I understand them.) It's time we tried something different. This could be fun.

All we have to do is have enough people noncooperate and withdraw from their "society" and hopefully the men with guns will learn their lives are easier if they leave us alone.
Now, you can be certain the average bureaucrat doesn't know this stuff. They are just hired to follow orders. Judges and prosecutors on the other hand should be well aware of the scam.