• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

Started by Raineyrocks, October 10, 2008, 12:24 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

Raineyrocks

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/10/shark.virgin.birth.ap/index.html
     
DNA test proves it -- baby shark has no father

   
RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Scientists have confirmed the second case of a "virgin birth" in a shark.
A blacktip shark in the wild patrols the vast expanse of the Indian Ocean.

A blacktip shark in the wild patrols the vast expanse of the Indian Ocean.

In a study reported Friday in the Journal of Fish Biology, scientists said DNA testing proved that a pup carried by a female blacktip shark in a Virginia aquarium contained no genetic material from a male.

The first documented case of asexual reproduction, or parthenogenesis, among sharks involved a pup born to a hammerhead at an Omaha, Nebraska, zoo.

"This first case was no fluke," Demian Chapman, a shark scientist and lead author of the second study, said in a statement. "It is quite possible that this is something female sharks of many species can do on occasion."

The scientists cautioned that the rare asexual births should not be viewed as a possible solution to declining global shark populations. The aquarium sharks that reproduced without mates each carried only one pup, while some species can produce litters of a dozen or more.

"It is very unlikely that a small number of female survivors could build their numbers up very quickly by undergoing virgin birth," Chapman said.

The medical mystery began 16 months ago after the death of Tidbit, a blacktip shark that had lived for eight years at the Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center in Virginia Beach. No male blacktip sharks were present during her eight years.

In May 2007, the 5-foot, 94-pound shark died after it was given a sedative before undergoing a yearly checkup. The 10-inch shark pup was found during a necropsy, surprising aquarium officials. They initially thought the embryonic pup was either the product of a virgin birth or a cross between the blacktip and a male of another shark species -- which has never been documented, Chapman said.

Tidbit's pup was nearly full term, and likely would have been quickly eaten by "really big sand tiger sharks" that were in the tank, Chapman said in a telephone interview from Florida.

That is what happened to the tiny hammerhead pup in the Omaha case.
   
"By the time they could realize what they were looking at, something munched the baby," he said of aquarium workers. The remains of the pup were used for the DNA testing.

Virgin birth has been proven in some bony fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds, and has been suspected among sharks in the wild.

The scientists who studied the Virginia and Nebraska sharks said the newly formed pups acquired one set of chromosomes when the mother's chromosomes split during egg development, then united anew.

Absent the chromosomes present in the male sperm, the offspring of an asexual conception have reduced genetic diversity and, the scientists said, may be at a disadvantage for surviving in the wild. A pup, for instance, can be more susceptible to congenital disorders and diseases.

The scientists said their findings offer "intriguing questions" about how frequently automictic parthenogenesis occurs in the wild.

"It is possible that parthenogenesis could become more common in these sharks if population densities become so low that females have trouble finding mates," said Mahmood Shivji, one of the scientists and director of the Guy Harvey Research Institute at Nova Southeastern University in Florida.

The DNA fingerprinting techniques used by the scientists are identical to those used in human paternity testing.

Chapman, who is with the Institute for Ocean Conservation Science at Stony Brook, was assisted in the study by Beth Firchau of the Virginia Aquarium.

Chapman and Shivji were on the team that made the first discovery of virgin birth involving the Nebraska shark.

K. Darien Freeheart


Raineyrocks

Quote from: Kevin Dean on October 10, 2008, 12:51 PM NHFT
That's a nifty story! Thanks!


Your welcome!  I thought it was pretty different myself.  I wonder what they will name the shark, hmmm, any ideas?

I'm think Jesushark!  ;D

Pat K

Quote from: raineyrocks on October 10, 2008, 01:23 PM NHFT
Quote from: Kevin Dean on October 10, 2008, 12:51 PM NHFT
That's a nifty story! Thanks!


Your welcome!  I thought it was pretty different myself.  I wonder what they will name the shark, hmmm, any ideas?

I'm think Jesushark!  ;D

Jawsus!

Friday

Quote from: raineyrocks on October 10, 2008, 12:24 PM NHFT
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/10/shark.virgin.birth.ap/index.html
You beat me to it, rainey.  I was going to post this, was just waiting for them to put it on the front page of CNN... which they now have.  ::)

Friday


Friday

OMG, I just read the article and realized THEY KILLED JAWSUS!   :'(   :hopmad:

Raineyrocks

Quote from: Pat K on October 10, 2008, 01:26 PM NHFT
Quote from: raineyrocks on October 10, 2008, 01:23 PM NHFT
Quote from: Kevin Dean on October 10, 2008, 12:51 PM NHFT
That's a nifty story! Thanks!


Your welcome!  I thought it was pretty different myself.  I wonder what they will name the shark, hmmm, any ideas?

I'm think Jesushark!  ;D

Jawsus!

That's great, I love it!  :biglaugh:

Raineyrocks

Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:28 PM NHFT
Quote from: raineyrocks on October 10, 2008, 12:24 PM NHFT
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/10/shark.virgin.birth.ap/index.html
You beat me to it, rainey.  I was going to post this, was just waiting for them to put it on the front page of CNN... which they now have.  ::)

:neenerneener: :biglaugh:    Sure you were!   ::)   Just kidding!

Raineyrocks

Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:37 PM NHFT
OMG, I just read the article and realized THEY KILLED JAWSUS!   :'(   :hopmad:


What do you mean?  :o

Friday

Quote from: raineyrocks on October 10, 2008, 02:43 PM NHFT
Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:37 PM NHFT
OMG, I just read the article and realized THEY KILLED JAWSUS!   :'(   :hopmad:


What do you mean?  :o
What the article says is that they accidentally killed the mother shark, and only discovered while doing a "necropsy" on her that she had a baby inside her.  So the baby shark was never actually born.

Raineyrocks

Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:48 PM NHFT
Quote from: raineyrocks on October 10, 2008, 02:43 PM NHFT
Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:37 PM NHFT
OMG, I just read the article and realized THEY KILLED JAWSUS!   :'(   :hopmad:


What do you mean?  :o
What the article says is that they accidentally killed the mother shark, and only discovered while doing a "necropsy" on her that she had a baby inside her.  So the baby shark was never actually born.

How in the world could I have missed that?  Nevermind maybe that question shouldn't be answered.  This totally sucks and puts a downspin on this whole thread now, thanks Friday!  What kind of a peppy moderator are you anyway?  :biglaugh: :Bolt:

Sam A. Robrin

Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:37 PM NHFT
OMG, I just read the article and realized THEY KILLED JAWSUS!   :'(   :hopmad:


Relax, he'll be up and around in three days' time . . .

Raineyrocks

Quote from: Sam A. Robrin on October 10, 2008, 04:15 PM NHFT
Quote from: Friday on October 10, 2008, 02:37 PM NHFT
OMG, I just read the article and realized THEY KILLED JAWSUS!   :'(   :hopmad:


Relax, he'll be up and around in three days' time . . .


:biglaugh: :biglaugh:   

Puke

Abiogenesis in complex cellular life forms!?
Groovy.  8)