9-11 was an inside job

[jaqeboy]

... The folks that carry out destructive extra-legal ops are called "jackals" in his lexicon. They foment revolutions, commit assassinations, etc. When someone says "9/11 Was an Inside Job", they aren't implying that your letter carrier did it. 

Here's an example that should reveal the "tip of the iceberg" - article from The Creek (Rock Creek Free Press):

Cheney Directed Assassination Ring

BY MATT SULLIVAN / RCFP

Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh revealed during a talk at the University of Minnesota, March 10, that Dick Cheney orchestrated assassination squads directly out of the office of the vice president.

Here is what Hersh said: "After 9/11, I haven't written about this yet, but the Central Intelligence Agency was very deeply involved in domestic activities against people they thought to be enemies of the state. Without any legal authority for it. They haven't been called on it yet. That does happen.

"Right now, today, there was a story in The New York Times that if you read it carefully mentioned something known as the Joint Special Operations Command — JSOC it's called. It is a special wing of our special operations community that is set up independently. They do not report to anybody, except in the Bush-Cheney days, they reported directly to the Cheney office. They did not report to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or to Mr. [Robert] Gates, the secretary of defense. They reported directly to him [Cheney].

"Congress has no oversight of it. It's an executive assassination ring essentially, and it's been going on and on and on. Just today in the Times there was a story that its leader, a three star admiral named [William H.] McRaven, ordered a stop to it because there were so many collateral deaths.
...

[jaqeboy]

Another good article from "the  Creek"
=============================

Where Was NORAD on 9/11?

By Dean M. Jackson - Washington, DC

Testifying before the 9/11 Commission General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the commission in response to a question on NORAD's failure to anticipate the 9/11 attacks, "I can't answer the hypothetical. It's more - it's the way that we were directed to posture, looking outward." As we will see below NORAD, since its inception in 1958, was tasked with more than merely "looking outward".

I found General Myers' testimony on the capabilities of NORAD on 9/11 to be surprising, since it was long assumed that NORAD's mission was more than "looking outward". However, the 9/11 Truth Movement has been negligent in producing any documents that would confirm their suspicion that NORAD was tasked with watching over and intercepting errant aircraft in American skies before 9/11; that NORAD's mission was more robust than "looking outward". The following pre-9/11 citations conclusively documents the true capabilities of NORAD on the morning of 9/11.

    "The NORAD mission is threefold. NORAD's first responsibility is to provide surveillance and control of the airspace covering North America, specifically the airspace of Canada and the United States. This mission is based on agreements between the two governments....

    The second part of NORAD's mission is to provide the NCAs [National Command Authorities] with tactical warning and attack assessment of an aerospace attack against North America. This information is essential to providing those in command with information to aid them in making decisions on how to respond to an attack against North America.

    NORAD's third responsibility is to provide an appropriate response to any form of air attack. NORAD was created to provide a defense against the threat from air-breathing aircraft, specifically the threat from long-range bombers. However, over the years the threat has changed. Now NORAD must provide an appropriate response to a multitude of threats, to include the air-launched cruise missile (ALCM) and the sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM)."
    — NORAD AIR DEFENSE OVERVIEW; Northeast Parallel Architectures Center, Syracuse University, pre-1995 (http://www.npac.syr.edu/projects/civ/vanguard/C2Demo/OPRef.html).
....

[jaqeboy]

... The folks that carry out destructive extra-legal ops are called "jackals" in his lexicon. They foment revolutions, commit assassinations, etc. When someone says "9/11 Was an Inside Job", they aren't implying that your letter carrier did it. 

...Dick Cheney orchestrated assassination squads directly out of the office of the vice president....Without any legal authority for it....a special wing of our special operations community...They do not report to anybody, except...directly to the Cheney office..."Congress has no oversight...an executive assassination ring...so many collateral deaths.
...

ie, not a bunch of lackadaisical letter sorters and carriers just working towards their federal retirement...

[Tunga]

http://www.ntsb.gov/info/Rec_Radar_%20Data_%20Study_all%20_aircraft.pdf


On page 7 of 21 you can read how the radar data presented by the Air Force 84th RADES ignores the incoming information and replaces it with a TXT file.

The remainder of the flight data is prerecorded "drill" or faked for the simpletons reading this.

The techs working at 84 RADES probably had no idea they were part of the greatest deception of the 21st century.

Air traffic controllers from coast to coast see what RADES shows them as ALL radar data funnels through them.

This is not a drill people.

We have been duped. The evidence is right in front of your face. Open your eyes and see it.

[jaqeboy]

Thursday, April 9, at 7:30 pm:
David Ray Griffin
the foremost researcher and spokesperson for 9-11 Truth
will be speaking at South Church
292 State St.
Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

Sponsored by the Seacoast 9-11 Questions Group.
Free and open to the public - donations will be accepted to help cover expenses.
For more information email us or call 603-749-9159.

The title of his talk will be "9/11: Time for a Second Look." He will be pointing out that many people---including politicians and journalists---formed their ideas about 9/11 and the 9/11 truth movement early on, when there seemed little reason to doubt the Bush administration's honesty and when the 9/11 truth movement could be caricatured, without too much exaggeration, as a bunch of kids on the Internet.

But now we have abundant evidence of the Bush-Cheney's administration's willingness to break the law and to tell lies that would lead to millions of deaths. And the 9/11 truth movement is now led intellectually by scientists and other professionals, as shown by the emergence of various organizations, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (which includes scientists), Veterans for 9/11 Truth, and the Scientific Panel to Investigate 9/11. The movement also includes several former intelligence officers.

Thanks to these professionals, the evidence that the official story is false is now overwhelming. The only problem is to get people to look at the evidence. Once they are willing to do this, they quickly see that the official story simply cannot be true.

Finally, the replacement of the Bush administration with the Obama administration is important in three respects. First, potential whistleblowers may become less afraid to come forward. Second, the media may become more willing to expose the dozens of contradictions and other problems in the official myth. And third, there is at least the chance for a real investigation. The petition for both Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth and Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, for example, ends by asking President Obama to authorize a new, truly independent, investigation.

[jaqeboy]

Boston 911 Truth are adding the founder of VeteransFor911Truth.org, Alfons Olszewski, to the speaking line-up at the David Ray Griffin appearance for a brief address. Details on that Saturday, 11 April event can be found at Boston 911 Truth's site.

They are contacting Vets for Peace to see if they can get them to come hear about 911Truth.

In addition to Veterans (V911T.org), there are Marines for 911 Truth, as well.

MV911T lists many of the known groups on their "About" page.

[jaqeboy]

Here's the long-form press release for the Boston David Ray Griffin appearance. This looks like it'll be well worthwhile to travel down to. We do have a carpool site on eRideShare.com. Just click on http://mv911t.erideshare.com and use the password "truth". This oughta help people hook up cars with riders.
=================================

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

9/11: Time for a Second Look

"9/11 guru" David Ray Griffin to speak at Boston University, April 11, 2009

Matthew Rothschild of The Progressive calls David Ray Griffin "the guru of the 9/11 conspiracy movement."  Howard Zinn, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Boston University, says that "David Ray Griffin's provocative questions about 9/11 deserve to be investigated and addressed." No single proponent of alternative theories concerning the events of September 11, 2001 has received more attention than David Ray Griffin, who will be giving a public lecture at Boston University's Morse Auditorium on Saturday, April 11, 2009 at 7pm. Dr. Griffin's appearance at BU will be his first ever in Boston, after which he will embark on his second European tour, speaking about 9/11 in London, Brussels, Paris, Madrid, Lausanne, Lucerne, Hamburg, Stockholm, Trondheim, and Oslo. The BU event is co-sponsored by the Boston University School of Theology and the Boston 9/11 Truth Committee.

(see video trailer)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb_MzN5DWQc

David Ray Griffin is Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology, Emeritus, at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University in Claremont, CA, where he is a co-director of the Center for Process Studies.

Dr. Griffin has published (as author or editor) 34 books, primarily in theology, philosophy, and philosophy of religion, with special emphases on the problem of evil and the relation between science and religion.

Seven of his books deal with 9/11: The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11 (2004), The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (2005), Christian Faith and the Truth about 9/11: A Call to Reflection and Action (2006), 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out (2006, co-edited with Peter Dale Scott), Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory (2007), 9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press, and The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the ExposÈ (2008). †

In 2008 Griffin also made presentations on 9/11 at the European Parliament and the Japanese Diet.

In his latest book, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 911, the Cover -Up, and the Expose, Dr. Griffin once again invokes the tragic events of December 7, 1941, laying out further evidence for why he believes the attacks of September 11, 2001 were an "inside job"  —  a false flag attack — that can be traced to the highest levels of the US government. In defense of his thesis, Griffin:

–points out the continued failure of the mainstream press to investigate any of the serious questions and anomalies that contradict the official account of 9/11, and claims the media dishonestly uses the term "conspiracy theory" to preempt any criticism of the government's own conspiracy theory involving 19 "radical" Muslims. †

–deconstructs, using expert testimony, the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) five "crucial claims" about the World Trade Center collapses, showing that NIST, in fact, provides no supporting evidence for any of its claims. He further points out that NIST and the 911 Commission ignored vast amounts of relevant evidence pointing to controlled demolition as the cause of all three WTC towers' (1, 2 & 7) collapses, among which were the sudden-onset, symmetrical collapses at near-freefall speeds, molten pools observed beneath all three debris piles even six weeks after 9-11, indicating temperatures considerably higher than jet fuel and/or office fires could possibly have generated, and residue of explosives found in Ground Zero's dust.

–presents plausible motives that high-level government officials clearly had for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks. Griffin shows that the 9/11 Commission actively suppressed any mention of these motives, as well as the fact that key members of the Bush Administration were signatories to a radical plan drawn up in 2000 by a neo-conservative think tank named Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which called for dramatically increased militarization and global dominance. The PNAC document suggested the necessity for a "New Pearl Harbor" event to trick the American public into backing its agenda, hence, the title of Griffin's first and latest exposÈ, The New Pearl Harbor (Revisited). †

Dr. Griffin's 9/11 books have been endorsed by Michael Chossudovsky, William Sloane Coffin, Harvey Cox, Richard Falk, Catherine Austin Fitts, David Griscom, Jim Hightower, British MP Michael Meacher, Mark Crispin Miller, Rosemary Ruether, Marcus Raskin, Paul Craig Roberts, Peter Dale Scott, Gerry Spence, Lorie Van Auken, Howard Zinn, and former CIA officials Robert Baer, Bill Christison, and Ray McGovern.

Four of Griffin's books have been given special recognition: The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortion received the 2006 Helios Foundation Award for 2006. Debunking 9/11 Debunking was a Bronze Medal Winner in the 2008 Independent Publisher Book Awards. The New Pearl Harbor Revisited was named a "Pick of the Week" in 2008 by Publishers Weekly.

His essays and interviews about 9/11 have appeared in such disparate publications as Zion's Herald1, Hustler Magazine2,†Global Outlook3, LA Times Magazine4, Conversations in Religion and Theology5, Penthouse Netherlands6, Whole Earth Times7, Tikkun8, and Le Monde Diplomatique9.

Dr. Griffin has been featured on "The Richard & Judy Show" (London)10, †C-Span (twice)11, †ABC News Radio12, "Tucker" on MSNBC13, †CBC (Canadian Broadcast Corporation)14, the BBC's "Heaven and Earth,"15 and in over 400 radio talk-shows16, †including Democracy Now!17. †Many videos of his talks and interviews are available on the Internet18. †

During the week prior to his lecture in Boston, Dr. Griffin will also give lectures in Wayne, PA, Vassar College, Portsmouth and Keene, NH.

For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact:

Boston University School of Theology
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Boston 9/11 Truth Committee
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[1] "9/11: A Christian Theologian's Response: Deceptions of Empire and the Anti-Imperial Gospel of Jesus," Zion's Herald, July/August 2005: 5-6, 39-40 (available at http://www.anthonyflood.com/griffin911xntheologiansresponse.htm <http://www.anthonyflood.com/griffin911xntheologiansresponse.htm> ).

[2] †"What If Everything You Know about 9/11 Is Wrong?" Interview with Bruce David and Carolyn Sinclair, Hustler Magazine, August, 2005: 32-35, 108 (available at http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050604140153943 <http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20050604140153943> †[text only] and http://911truth.org/docs/drgHfull.pdf (with graphics).

[3] "Truth and Politics of 9/11: Omissions and Distortions of The 9/11 Commission Report," Global Outlook (www.GlobalOutlook.ca <http://www.globaloutlook.ca/> ), Issue 10 (Spring-Summer 2005), 45-56.

[4] "Getting Agnostic about 9/11" (an interview conducted by Mark Ehrman), LA Times Magazine, August 28, 2005 (http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-crgriffin35aug28,1,3835884.story?coll=la-headlines-magazine <http://www.latimes.com/features/printedition/magazine/la-tm-crgriffin35aug28,1,3835884.story?coll=la-headlines-magazine> ).

[5] †"Response to Ian Markham" (to Markham's review of The New Pearl Harbor), Conversations in Religion and Theology, 3/2 (November, 2005): 220-236.

[6] †"Rokende Pistolen Gezocht: De Echte Daders Achter 9/11" (Interview), Penthouse (Dutch), December, 2006: 088-091.

[7] †"9/11 Under Attack: David Ray Griffin: Why the Official Story Just Doesn't Make Sense." Interview by Abigail Lewis. Whole Life Times, September 2006: 53-54.

[8] †"The American Empire and 9/11," Tikkun, March-April 2007) †(http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0703/frontpage/empire911 <http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0703/frontpage/empire911> ).

[9] †"The Truly Distracting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory: A Reply to Alexander Cockburn," Le Monde Diplomatique Norway, English version, March 2007 (http://www.lmd.no/index.php?article=1408#fotnoter <http://www.lmd.no/index.php?article=1408#fotnoter> ).

[10] June 22, 2004.

[11] †(1) "9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond?", Lecture at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, April 18, 2005, broadcast on C-SPAN2 [BookTV], April 30, 2005 (available at http://www.911blogger.com/2005/04/proper-release-of-griffin-in-madison.html); BookTV, C-SPAN 2, November 24 & 25. (2) "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out," September 24, 2006, Berkeley, CA, edited by Peter Dale Scott and David Ray Griffin. The event featured remarks by Griffin, Scott, Peter Phillips, Kevin Ryan and Ray McGovern, who served as host.

[12] ABC News Radio, September 11, 2005.

[13] †"Tucker," MSNBC, August 9, 2005 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxKW3EqbfRE).
†
[14] < "9/11: Truth, Lies and Conspiracy: Interview: David Ray Griffin," CBC News, August 25, 2006 (http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911griffin.html <http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911griffin.html> ).

[15] †"Heaven and Earth," BBC1, September 10, 2006 (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9181676883393469552 <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9181676883393469552> ).

[16] ††For some of these, see http://www.radiodujour.com/guests/griffin_david_ray/index.html <http://www.radiodujour.com/guests/griffin_david_ray/index.html> .

[17] †"The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks," Democracy Now! May 26, 2004 (http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/26/150221 <http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/26/150221> ). Wednesday, May 26th.

[18] †See http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=david+ray+griffin&num=10&so=0&start=30 <http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=david+ray+griffin&amp;num=10&amp;so=0&amp;start=30> .

[19] †Independent Publishers (http://www.independentpublisher.com/article.php?page=1157&urltitle=Announcing%202007%20Independent%20Publisher%20Book%20Awards%20Results <http://www.independentpublisher.com/article.php?page=1157&amp;urltitle=Announcing%202007%20Independent%20Publisher%20Book%20Awards%20Results> ).

[20] Publishers Weekly, November 24, 2008 (http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6617001.html?industryid=47159 <http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6617001.html?industryid=47159> ).

[jaqeboy]

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

pp.7-31 (25)

Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen

doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007

Abstract

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

Keywords: JScanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, Differential scanning calorimetry, DSC analysis, World Trade Center, WTC dust, 9/11, Iron-rich microspheres, Thermite, Super-thermite, Energetic nanocomposites, Nano-thermite
Affiliation: Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

MORE DETAILS:

"Formally published in a peer-reviewed Chemical Physics journal, today:"

http://www.911blogger.com/node/19761

[Tunga]

Dr. Jones wrote an article in the eighties that appeared in Scientific American on the subject of Cold Fusion. In it, he described the success of Pons and Fleishman as a fluke because the He3 (Helium 3 - a byproduct of fusion) that was generated couldn't be re-produced by other researchers.

The US Navy has since validated the claims of Pons and Fleishman. Dr. Jones may or may not be a friend of the 9-11 truth movement. Listen and read what he has to say with your eyes WIDE open. Spooks cast shadows when they are illuminated in the right light.

Micro Nukes at the WTC.



http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/07/03/05/ward.htm

[jaqeboy]

Unexploded Nanothermite Found In WTC Dust

[jaqeboy]

An excellent paper by David Ray Griffin, delivered in Denver recently:

Nationalistic Faith (see attached)

[Tunga]

Also found at Rense.com.

Flight 93 was shot down.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/military-whistleblower-claims-she-witnessed-flight-93-shootdown-order.html

[jaqeboy]

Exotic High Tech Explosives Positively Identified in World Trade Center Dust

— Editor

A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.

The samples were taken from far-separated locations in Manhattan, some as early as 10 minutes after the second tower (WTC 1) collapsed, ruling out any possible contamination from cleanup operations.

Authored by an international team of physicists, chemists, and others, the research paper was titled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe." It was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2., and is available online for free download. The lead author is Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen.

The paper ends with the statement, "Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material."
...

[jaqeboy]

Also found at Rense.com.

Flight 93 was shot down.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/military-whistleblower-claims-she-witnessed-flight-93-shootdown-order.html

The whistleblowers are coming out! I wonder if she's for real?

[coffeeseven]

Nelson says that she was stationed at at Fort Meade under the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center Hospital and was training as a radiologic technologist having finished basic training three weeks prior. On 9/11, her rank was Private First Class.

Unless there's 9,000 people that fit that description she may just as well had given her real name. That's enough info even I could find out who she is. That's not to say I don't believe her it just seems a little odd.