• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Sam's Order for Release has been issued.

Started by Silent_Bob, June 09, 2009, 01:07 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

John

#15
June 09, 2009, 06:52 PM NHFT
Nice!
Congratulations & THANK YOU Sam!
:sunny:

Russell Kanning

#16
June 09, 2009, 08:30 PM NHFT
Quote from: Silent_Bob on June 09, 2009, 01:33 PM NHFT
If anyone talks to Sam would you ask him to call me.
you will have to call free talk live and try to get a word in past mark and ian ;D

Russell Kanning

#17
June 09, 2009, 08:31 PM NHFT
very good news ... it seems that on at least one issue the government gave in first

Discipula

#18
June 09, 2009, 08:55 PM NHFT
Quote from: John on June 09, 2009, 06:52 PM NHFT
Nice!
Congratulations & THANK YOU Sam!
:sunny:

I'm little more than a lurker but this reminded me that Sam deserves everybody to stand up and say thank you.

J’raxis 270145

#19
June 09, 2009, 10:34 PM NHFT
Quote from: Josh on June 09, 2009, 06:00 PM NHFT
I hope he can find counsel with the balls to pursue criminal charges for the 58 days he'll never get back.

As I understand it, that was the plan that Sam and Ivy were working on. Not sure of the current status of that considering Ivy's situation, though.

John Edward Mercier

#20
June 10, 2009, 07:17 AM NHFT
He most likely won't be able to pursue criminal charges... as the DA would be needed.
But Kat put forth something that caught my attention.
What I'm thinking is civil suit on Part First Article Four, Ten, and Eighteen.

Since the 'crime' of contempt of court is not being punished equally amongst all defendents in the 'days served' ruling. Four and Ten would be the grounds for his contempt, while Eighteen would be the grounds for restitution. Though a decent counsel would more likely be able to attribute a greater value than $50 per day.

Ogre

#21
June 10, 2009, 09:05 AM NHFT
Wonderful, wonderful news!

Mike Barskey

#22
June 10, 2009, 09:14 AM NHFT
Quote from: John Edward Mercier on June 10, 2009, 07:17 AM NHFT
He most likely won't be able to pursue criminal charges... as the DA would be needed.
But Kat put forth something that caught my attention.
What I'm thinking is civil suit on Part First Article Four, Ten, and Eighteen.

Since the 'crime' of contempt of court is not being punished equally amongst all defendents in the 'days served' ruling. Four and Ten would be the grounds for his contempt, while Eighteen would be the grounds for restitution. Though a decent counsel would more likely be able to attribute a greater value than $50 per day.

Was that English?

Lloyd Danforth

#23
June 10, 2009, 09:48 AM NHFT
Lawspeek

TackleTheWorld

#24
June 11, 2009, 01:29 AM NHFT

Lloyd Danforth

#25
June 11, 2009, 06:22 AM NHFT
Quote from: J'raxis 270145 on June 09, 2009, 10:34 PM NHFT
Quote from: Josh on June 09, 2009, 06:00 PM NHFT
I hope he can find counsel with the balls to pursue criminal charges for the 58 days he'll never get back.

As I understand it, that was the plan that Sam and Ivy were working on. Not sure of the current status of that considering Ivy's situation, though.
The guy who was supplying Ivy with her moves is not in jail.

Russell Kanning

#26
June 11, 2009, 08:27 AM NHFT
and neither is SamIAm :)
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions