Free access to PACER (federal court documents)

[KBCraig]

These people have done a great thing, by providing a free browser plug-in (Firefox only), and an archive system for PACER.

They certainly don't have everything yet, but any time someone running the Recap plug-in buys a PACER document, it is automatically uploaded to the public archive, where others can access it for free.

https://www.recapthelaw.org/

[bigmike]

Thanks KB. PACER is great if you want to look at the pleadings and motions of current federal cases. I use it a few times a month.

[JosephSHaas]

...
https://www.recapthelaw.org/

Thanks K.B.C. To get to there later.

For now and for Jason Gerhard #20229-045 @ The FCI Fairton, P.O. Box 420, Fairton, N.H. 08320 is his latest 3-page "MOTION FOR REPLACEMENT OF COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL" there?

The reason being that "I have tried to call attorney Glickman's office numerous times, emailed him and written letters requesting transcripts...that have NEVER been sent to me as of the date on this motion" (emphasis ADDed, of Aug. 10th '09 postmarked to me 8/12 and delivered just two days later= yesterday, Fri., Aug.14th, and by the Ellen Sullivan, Esq. letter of Aug. 4 '09 referring to this "First Circuit Appeal No. 08-2056" and Attorney PAUL M. GLICKMAN e-mail: pgm at glickmanturley dot com for: G.T. GLICKMAN TURLEY, LLP, 250 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210, TEL. 617.399.7770 http://www.glickmanturley.com "the brief is now due on August 18, 2009."

I REPEAT: "the brief is now due on August 18"th = next Tuesday = in only two more business days!! What a "lazy" bastard! NOT to even send the transcripts to his client, whose "boss"? Ellen has to write of trying to get "a continuance" granted for "mid October" = another two months!?  WHEN did his office get these transcripts? and WHY wasn't a copy sent to Jason?

I heard than Danny got his, and I've asked Bill to ask Danny if he'd please send me a copy of that "side bar" of all the attorneys with Singal right after Sven tried to present a copy of the Art. 49-N.H. Constitution chain-of-command for when the governor does FAIL in his Art. 51 duty for which he "shall" be "responsible for" NOT making the Feds finally accept by 40USC255 our N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 offer from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution* per the 1943 Adams case of the U.S. Supreme Court to Reno while on the Witness Stand when he answered Kinsella that he did NOTHING to try to resolve this issue peaceably, which reply by Reno was correct in the direct** as he DID sign the Petition with Ed & Elaine, Bernie, Randy Weaver, and other(s), including myself on June 20, 2007 that I personally delivered to the governor's receptionist on the next day, June 21st @ 4:29 o'clock p.m. and that David Ridley did question the governor about this later, and Lynch's reply was that Ed was not even on his "radar unit".

So to continue because of Attorney "sloppiness" or "strategy" to get it continued so as to incorporate my RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims complaint #2009-013 filed Oct. 15, 2008 hearing AGAINST the Gov. John H. Lynch (of Hopkinton) on Sept. ___, 2009 in Concord, N.H. for him to pay me this $5,000 for his wrongs in not enforcing the law! that IF he did, then there might have been a different result, like for him to tell the Feds to "back off" of approaching, let alone kidnapping our Art. 12-N.H. "inhabitants" Ed & Elaine Brown on Oct. 4, 2007 since no U.S. Code as an other law shall be controllable over us withOUT the full "consent" (by offer and acceptance, as like in the saying: "it takes two to tango") of EITHER our "legislative body" = The N.H. General Court or Legislature; OR the individual.

What Sven was trying to do was to get this document of evidence into an Exhibit #___ to be weighed by the jury, since although Reno did NOT "directly"** do any peaceful actions to try to resolve this with ANY of the Feds, he DID do so "indirectly" by my presentation of this document to the governor who was and still is our "public servant" who was supposed to serve the question for the Feds to answer.

And so this militant action by the Feds from the word: militate meaning FORCE as evidence to be offset by THIS evidence of their WRONG as having NO jurisdictional authority over ANY of the inhabitants here, and that IN-cludes those brought to here, as those "Removal Hearings" in Missouri for Jason, Texas for Reno, New York for Danny, and Vermont for Bob, were in-complete, as their attorneys were ineffective as NOT to put this 40USC255 into the equation.

* Danny still "harping" about this U.S. District Court somehow being an "equity court" where "Constitutional Rights do not apply" re: THE AMERICAN'S BULLETIN of Jan./Feb.2008 that he sent me a copy of on Aug. 10th re: http://urbansurvival.com but that it is not "Constitutional Rights" but of rights as guaranteed BY the Constitution and with their reference to "a tax court" that he thinks is THIS court!? No! Danny, that is a separate court, of actually some administrative executive internal court that you go to by contract IF you choose to waive your rights.  I've known about this for decades and have NEVER set foot in any of these Star Chamber-like places where the burden of proof is reverse in like a show-cause hearing WHY you do not owe the tax and canNOT base it upon any rights. Now WHY would anybody EVER go to there!? It's not a "court" but a con! These Art. III, Sec. 1, U.S. "inferior Courts" of Congress must comply with the law of set-up, BEFORE they do send off its victims to be corrected in these F.C.I.'s.  They must be corrected first! And if not done by themselves, then to have the President Pardon or Commute all victims therein, after a Reprieve.

Yours truly, - - Joe

P.S. Bill: As I told you months ago: Gary B. has the other "documents" Danny wants, so to contact him for an address for where to send them to you. A cc: of this by copy and paste to the both of you.  Danny is "very" upset that these are not already in your possession! re: his letter to me of Aug. 7th, postmarked 12 Aug. that I did just receive in yesterday's mail: Fri., Aug. 14th so notified the day AFTER he was  to call me on Thu. 8/13 @ 11:30 AM "to get answers" that YOU should have given to him months ago!!! as my envelopes to him have been returned by the facility as NEVER delivered to Danny.