• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Utah Legislature Proposes Ban on Specific Checkpoints

Started by Walker, February 13, 2012, 06:46 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

Walker

Representative David Butterfield has introduced HB 140, a bill that would amend the code. The bill would prohibit checkpoints where police officers ask for a motorist's license, registration, or insurance. It would also prohibit checkpoints based on sobriety.

It seems the same old crowd seeks to reinvent itself by opposing the legislation. MADD maintains that the checkpoints are a deterrent, but thus far has provided no evidence to substantiate that claim. The only study with which I am aware is the one in Maryland that shows its Checkpoint Strikeforce program is not a deterrent.*

Representative Lee Perry is a police officer who supports checkpoints, even though he acknowledges that they are less effective (see http://www.ksl.com/?nid=960&sid=19192238&title=legislature-looks-at-banning-dui-checkpoints&s_cid=queue-5).

An 8-5 committee vote has already advanced the bill. See the bill's text here:
http://le.utah.gov/~2012/bills/hbillint/hb0140.htm


*The Maryland anti-drunk driving campaign called Checkpoint Strikeforce was evaluated for deterrence. The review found that there was no deterrent effect:

"To date, there is no evidence to indicate that this campaign, which involves a number of sobriety checkpoints and media activities to promote these efforts, has had any impact on public perceptions, driver behaviors, or alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes and injuries. This conclusion is drawn after examining statistics for alcohol-related crashes, police citations for impaired driving, and public perceptions of alcohol-impaired driving risk.

This quote is from Health Promotion Reports, July 1 2009.