Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 13

[Russell Kanning]

You can't eschew the courts in one breath (I refuse to acknowledge a court that finds me guilty of a felony) while using the same courts for your own means (I'm going to sue so and so so for damages because my reputation is hurt.)

It disturbs me when Ed uses the power of the government ... as when he kicked the Foxnews guys out ..... and all the endless suing. Ed told us that what started this whole situation was when he sued various fed employees including judge mcauliff .... who is the one that ran his trial.

[money dollars]

You can't eschew the courts in one breath (I refuse to acknowledge a court that finds me guilty of a felony) while using the same courts for your own means (I'm going to sue so and so so for damages because my reputation is hurt.)

You can if you are a hypocrite. 

[Nicholas Gilman]

You can't eschew the courts in one breath (I refuse to acknowledge a court that finds me guilty of a felony) while using the same courts for your own means (I'm going to sue so and so so for damages because my reputation is hurt.)

      I take it you were referring to me....show me.

[Atlas]

You can't eschew the courts in one breath (I refuse to acknowledge a court that finds me guilty of a felony) while using the same courts for your own means (I'm going to sue so and so so for damages because my reputation is hurt.)

You can if you are a hypocrite. 

Essentially, when the Feds have a gun in your mouth, one might become a little rattled and partially inconsistent. He's\she's probably the only millionaire in the world with the cajones to put his wealth (and easy lifestyle) on the line to bring the income tax question to the forefront while at the same time not giving himself up. He's got super hero status in my eyes.

[Nicholas Gilman]

   I wish for the Browns to be allowed to live in peace from the system,
from the media, and from any individual or entity that would harass them.  
Like we've been saying all along:

   Leave the Browns alone!

[LordBaltimore]

Again the issue for all you no brainers is not the courts but the people in the seats.

Hmm.  Multiple posts in a row saying the same thing.  Where is MacTheFork these days?

[Russell Kanning]

yep ... he is also fromwhateversource
macthefork
...

[LordBaltimore]

yep ... he is also fromwhateversource
macthefork

He's been holding a conversation with himself?

[money dollars]

Russell I agree with the FWED thet Margot is a slanderer.

I think you mean libeler  ???

slander = harmful statement in a transitory form, especially speech

libel = harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast

[Nicholas Gilman]

  I have this sudden feeling that in some cubicle somewhere, two people are
cheering for the system. 

[Russell Kanning]

yep ... he is also fromwhateversource
macthefork

He's been holding a conversation with himself?

I blasted his account .... that was kinda fun.

[LordBaltimore]

I blasted his account .... that was kinda fun.

You should do all three.

[error]

Again the issue for all you no brainers is not the courts but the people in the seats.

Hmm.  Multiple posts in a row saying the same thing.  Where is MacTheFork these days?

It's too bad this person's been blasted, because he's got it precisely backwards. The problem is not the people in the seats, it's the system itself. You can put whoever you want in the seats, and you'll still get evil results out.

[JosephSHaas]

O.K.  [ by http://www.google.com ]

So here's the page for that info about the "invisible tanks":

(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_research_and_development over to:

(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_camouflage over to:

(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camouflage over to:

(4) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisibility (*) over to:

(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloak_of_invisibility

(*) notice in footnote #1 the link to: http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/exhibit.asp?tip=1&id=4659&printer=1

And: for "invisible tanks" government, at page 2 #7 it gets you to this same "Imperial College in London" where this Sept. 11 '06 report (**) at http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t78311.html  mentions that: the "goal is to have a working example sometime next year."

= this year, 2007 for now!

So the question is: is this to: "render an object invisible to radar, although people could still see it" (**) or, as in the diagram (4) above, over to the actual picture at (*), is that (**) boogeyman going to visit Ed to try to slap on the cuffs when he least expects it? 

[Dave Ridley]

source is now ignored and smitten.  not necessarily in that order.

when he does something constructive or helpful (if I hear about it), I will unignore him.