Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 13

[JosephSHaas]

P.S. Maybe since the Sheriff has been told by ORDER to "Stand Down" by the Feds over there in Sullivan County too, that we ought to talk with the County Commissioners?

A.) Next Regular Board of Commissioners Meeting: Tuesday, April 17th @ 3:00 p.m.
     Unity - County Complex, 5 Nursing Home Drive, Ahern Building;

     see http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/
           http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/calander.htm
           http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/agenda_april3_07.pdf
           [see Commissioners' agenda 4/3/07 Upcoming Events]

     4:30 - :45 p.m. = Public Participation, [to see if they'll investigate this western policy].

B.) ....

Update:  I did just call the Sullivan County Commissioners' Office at 14 Main Street in Newport (looking east at the Town Hall, they're in the building to the left, same side of the road as the Superior Courthouse) @ 863-2560 and spoke with Lori who said that the Unity meeting that was tentatively scheduled for next Tuesday, April 17th has been cancelled for lack of agenda items, and so with the Unity-Newport scheduling every other time, even though the Unity one is not being held next Tuesday, it goes back to Newport again, and that if I'd like to be put on the Agenda so as not to have to wait until toward the end of the 2.5 hr. meeting from 3-5:30 p.m. for my part of the 15-minute "Public Participation" segment, that I can call Sharon Johnson Callem (spelling) to get an exact time of: ___:__ o'clock p.m. [so if anybody here would like to attend and for me to schedule same, please let me know].

The agenda item is to discuss that out-west Sheriff's written policy of requiring the Feds to report into his office with their printed chain-of-command papers BEFORE doing a "number" on any citizen of his county. The "number" here in New Hampshire being that of RSA Ch. 123:1 in that they/ the Feds have NO "number" of required filings with the Secretary of State's office, and as such are outlaws to Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17 of the U.S. Constitution too and deserve no cooperation from the County in ANY way, including the County Sheriff, who is an elected official so not really a department(*), but an office, and since Sheriff Prozzo remains silent on this issue http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/sheriff/index.htm e-mail: either sheriff at nhvt.net or sheriff at sullivancountynh.gov phone 603: 863-4200* then to put the Three Commissioners on official notice that they had better NOT allow their Sheriff(*) to run roughshod(**) over Ed Brown "again"! and especially AFTER being put on both written AND verbal notice!! lest an RSA Ch. 541-B:14,I lawsuit for up to $250,000 per claimant, ($2 million per incident) be brought in the Superior Court for a trial by jury of his peers to "award" this $amount for damages!

(**) The word roughshod defined as to treat inconsiderately or arrogantly, compare to a ruffian: a tough or rowdy fellow, from ruffiano, to pander, as a pimp, to cater to the vices or weaknesses of others, and in this case the vices or corruption of the Feds as explained above being their flaw or blemish, so really a flaw as in the imperfection or defect words, and my presumption is that the City Solicitor for Concord (Paul Cavanaugh) in his e-mail letter to the Tax Collector to NOT send the Feds the property tax bill is based on the former "imperfection" definition of the words: flaw to the word defect, as in a fault, whereas the REAL definition of the word defect is: "The lack of something NECESSARY or desirable" (emphasis ADDed AGAIN for what, by the RSA Ch. 123:1 statute is NOT a WANT of something desirable, BUT a NEED as in the must/ mandatory word: "shall"!)

And so, like Presidential Candidate Barry Goldwater said back in the 1960s: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is NO vice!", I equate this to Ed's Article 10 rights to revolt and whose duty it is to do so so as not to enslave us others, and so by the word vice from the Latin of vitium, there can be NO "offense"!  In fact the Sheriff has abandoned his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office to support the constitutions of both the United States and state of New Hampshire if he fails to protect citizen Brown, and because as Ronald Regan said to Mr. Breen (he called Mr. Green by mistake): I paid for this microphone!, Ed can say: I paid for this protection! and is entitled to such from his right as is supposed to be a guarantee by Article 12, Part the First, N.H. Constitution & Bill of Rights!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone). Vice-chairman or substitute for: deputy as replacing or succeeding the Sheriff as to maybe join The Constitution Rangers, in what is needed is from the Latin word vicis of: a change, as in the changing of the guard.

Modification: I just called Sheriff Michael L. Prozzo, Jr. at 3:30 p.m. and spoke with him for a few minutes in that he did get my phone recordings but that they ended before I finished what I was saying, and that is WHY I'd like to see the County Commissioners at their next meeting on Tuesday, May Day, and asked if he'd like to be there too, but him on vacation that day, and sometimes doesn't make it the meetings, that maybe a deputy could attend, or anyway to start the process for when he returns.

[lildog]

Oh for crying out loud... They can't just refuse to pay taxes, they have to go batshit insane and convert to some crackpot religion run by a guy called Sonny, and start calling themselves the House of Israel. Way to go, now just about everyone will be too embarrassed by your crackpottery to want to support you.

Exactly!

The further Ed strays from "mainstream" the more outlandish and crackpottish he'll seem to everyone and the less likely they will be to support him.

[TackleTheWorld]

And a video of seven supporters. Shot at Dada's apre-court party 12 March.

We made Ed's video blog

[lastlady]

And a video of seven supporters. Shot at Dada's apre-court party 12 March.

We made Ed's video blog

Maybe it is just me I couldn't hear any sound???

[Dave Ridley]

As of today (and for the last three days) the ed brown quest for fair trial blog has been down.   No one knows why, but I talked to Fred Smart today, the guy who runs it.  He says they are working on it and promptly returned my call.   They may merge with another blog that's out there and operate under a new URL but i dont think they're going away.

[armlaw]

And how does that work out in the real world?

Let me share with you something that I will refer to as an "Executive Summary" of the history to which most students are totally unaware. Reason?. Deliberate denial of factual documentation. You are welcome to produce any documented evidence to debunk what follows. I challenge you to do so;

"Historical Outline
First:   Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, Anno Domini 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states (people) to either conscript troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today.  This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.  This Conscription Act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders authority; it was magnified in A. D. 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, A. D. 1917). and again in A. D. 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress.  Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.
Second:   The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter ?Corp. U.S.?, Trademark name, ?United States Government?) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law.  This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.   (link to pdf image file of the full 1871 Act)
Third:   In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution's 13th Amendment and the national constitution's 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution.  At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in A. D. 1913.
Fourth:   Corp. U. S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in A. D. 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U. S. could not pay.  Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U. S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.
Fifth:   As A. D. 1913 began, Corp. U. S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money.  The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full).  The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank".  Corp. U. S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money.  Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system?again it has no government relation at all.  The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.
Sixth:   Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in A. D. 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) its own 16th amendment.  Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and this?such is the nature of corporate enactments.  You must also note that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment.  The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations.  We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.
Seventh:   Next (also A. D. 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment.  This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation's Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected, which is the subject matter of this amendment.  According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.
Eighth:   Accordingly, in A. D. 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained vacant because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national Senator.
Ninth:   In A. D. 1917, Corp. U. S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.
Tenth:   In A. D. 1918, President Wilson is re-elected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only.  Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity.  Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government officers.  It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France.  During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the nation.  Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of Commander in Chief was returned to him.
(See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well.  Mr. Adams was a fascinating man.)
Eleventh:   In A. D. 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they force a banking holiday to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with ?legal tender? Federal Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of Corp. U.S.
Twelfth:   Some time after A. D. 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program.  With the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number).  They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back.  If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card?s name and number to thus transact business relations for the card?s actual owner.  You are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification.  On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity?by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust.  More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust?s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way?what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you.
Thirteenth:   In A. D. 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.
Fourteenth:   In A. D. 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the People would discover what had been done with their money and would likely to kill them all and start over.  They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do.  Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law.  The People govern themselves.  Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.
Fifteenth:   By A. D. 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.
Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself.  We then ask you to contact us and share your discovery with us.
When you find there is no error in this historical outline, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.
The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop calling them "government".
Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them.  It is far more important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government and spread the word about the truth.  By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable.  They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world.  In fact it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right.  The process is a simple one.  The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth.  That's why we ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery.
That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign that God created you to be.  And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are.  And, finally, stop listening to the Bigfoot Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.
It's time to wake up and follow the truth, time to repent and become a moral and honorable society instead of lauding our Piety while we stand guilty of:
a) not knowing the truth;
b) not living the truth;
c) believing God will save us even though we have the tools to know the truth the ability to use the tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the tools we have to save ourselves and thereby become free.
The biggest problem with people that get all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S. is that they are blind to the truth having no remedy so they bail out of "the system" hell bent for a rebellion even the scripture says cannot be won with conventional weapons of war.  Would that we could instead follow the admonition of the King of kings and unite with truth to legally, lawfully and peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government thereby taking back the control our nation in accord with law.




NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection and everything you type will be used against you to detain you in a secret prison.

When one who has been honestly mistaken is shown or told the truth,
they will either stop being mistaken or cease being HONEST. Which will you do?

If you have to bow down and let WRONG continue, then what is the
purpose of your life?

Never utter these words "I do not know this, therefore it is false."
One must study to know, know to understand, and understand to judge...
"No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when eople are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own  weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders."

[(V)]

For future reference armlaw...

Instead of the lengthy post you should provide a link to the site where the info is from, with perhaps a summary.

And the best place to post something like this would be the Endless Whining and Debate area of the forum. 

[burnthebeautiful]

Maybe you should stay in your socialist country.

I would rather live in New Hampshire. I don't appreciate your attempt to make me feel unwelcome.

My previous post was unnecessarily harsh, and I apologize to Ed and anyone who might have been offended at my calling him a crackpot. The point I was trying to make was I wish he would just say "I don't want to pay taxes because it's my money and I shouldn't have to give away any of my money if I don't want to". Instead Ed is saying "I don't want to pay taxes due to Sonny being the son of Israel in the kingdom of" blah blah, whatever this new religion thing is. There I go being harsh again, I guess I can't help it.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a first-draft for one of my court cases, with reference to Ed in the footnote (**) you might like to read:

"State of New Hampshire    Supreme Court   Docket # 2006-0935   Joseph S. Haas  v.  The Town of Boscawen

Affidavit of Non-Compliance (by the Revenue Commissar)

--Enclosed please find a computer print-out of the e-mail letter from Commissioner George P. Blatsos of the Dept. of Revenue on Thu., Jan. 4 '07 @ 9:34 AM to me in regards to my e-mail letter in print-out form and delivered by me to his office on Thursday, December 7th, 2006 @ 4:25 o'clock p.m. as indicated on page 7 of my BRIEF of Feb. 7 '07, in which he did comply within sixty (60) days by  RSA Ch. 541-A:29,I [see: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LV/541-A/541-A-29.htm ]  but is now in default and violation since on or about April 7th '07, [me having given him one more week to compensate for "holy week" ] with still no II(a) or (b) decision.

--Now therefore this is a follow-up to my BRIEF-page 6 "Conclusion" for the court to please "Issue a request to...the...Commissioner of the Department of Revenue Administration, as to file an Amicus Curiae Brief of WHY they have not acted on the documents presented to them by me".

--The only curriculum**** [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curriculum ] for the definition of an education is spelled out in the statutes being: RSA Ch. 189:10 + 11 [ http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XV/189/189-10.htm and http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XV/189/189-11.htm from http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-XV-189.htm ]since there is no "studies prescribed by the state board" thus leaving only:

(1) "physiology and hygiene insofar as it relates to the effect of alcohol and other drugs and venereal diseases on the human system" and;

(2) "regular courses of instruction in the history, government and CONSTITUTIONs OF THE UNITED STATES(**) and New Hampshire" (emphasis ADDed*) from 1858 and 1923 respectfully, as both amended to Sept. 1st, 1975 by Chapter Law 183:1.

* Emphasis ADDed for "the proof is in the pudding" [ http://ask.yahoo.com/20020903.html ] as they say for the "results are what count", the curriculum**** so clogged with illegal courses beyond the statutory limits that the "science of being a teacher" as by the Pedagory*** word [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedagogy from Education= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational ]  has become an "art" form of subjective/ "within the individual mind" or "theor"y as in "Abstract reasoning", the word abstract from the Latin word: abstractus defined as: "removed from (concrete reality)" (*) see the word: "construction" here in the Psychometrics** [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychometrics ] definition from over at the word: Criterion* [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criteria ] for the rule "upon which a decision or judgment can be based" meaning your "decision or judgment" that unless the state can prove these "studies PRE-scribed by the state" (emphasis ADDed) BEFORE the enactment of Article 28-a (Part First, N.H. Constitution & Bill of Rights) for "Mandated Programs" to be "fully funded by the state" then the current funding for these extra POST-scribed courses are ALL both: unlawful AND illegal!!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone).

pc: Upton & Hatfield, Attn: Matthew R. Serge, Esq., 10 Centre Street, Concord, N.H. 03302-1090, 603: 224-7791 (and the Commissar plus A.G.)

_________________ [ footnotes]: __________________

--(*) What is "ultimate" reality? in the 4th + 5th dimensions, etc. [ see: http://www.ibiblio.org/eldritch/eaa/FL.HTM and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland ].

-(**) The Constitution of the United States pre-scribes by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 that "the Consent of the Legislature" must be obtained BEFORE the Congressional Court can buy and operate here in this state, by R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 which they have failed to file! and so like in The "National Treasure" movie of 2004 [ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0368891/ ] that I saw last night (on USA-TV Channel #___ here, and repeats again tonight at 8:00 p.m. and tomorrow afternoon, Mon., April 16th @ 5:00 p.m.) with Nicholas Cage as Ben Gates, quoting The Declaration of Independence [ http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm ] we too must see to it whether there be this "consent" and if NOT, then to "throw off such Government", as by our rights too as preserved and guaranteed by our N.H. Article 10 Right of Revolution when the ends of government get perverted or corrupt as in the House State-Federal Relations Committee and the governor by his non-actions under his RSA 92:2 oath of office to Articles 41 + 51 to be of honor, saying they "don't give a shit" http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=I+don't+give+a+shit and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shit denotes indifference, from indifferent= 2. "Of no great importance; insignificant" 5. "Neither good nor bad; mediocre" as in the lukewarm fence sitters who sit in the "gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat" http://thinkexist.com/quotation/it_is_not_the_critic_who_counts-not_the_man_who/12121.html

...thus leading up to the "manure" as described by Thomas Jefferson to so apply to The Tree of Liberty every twenty (20) years, http://www.hoboes.com/pub/Politics/Views%20of%20Freedom/Tree%20of%20Liberty as in the Ed Brown case #06-cr-71-01/02-SM ."

[Dave Ridley]

dont forget bill miller's demonstrations coming up next weekend in leb and claremont

i don't think i can make it to either of them but have tried to get the word out

[KBCraig]

News from the Union Leader:

http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Federal+judge+rejects+couple%27s+filings+in+tax-evasion+case&articleId=add30696-6568-402c-a028-c029206c1a1b

Federal judge rejects couple's filings in tax-evasion case

By KRISTEN SENZ
Union Leader Correspondent

A federal judge has rejected filings by Plainfield residents Ed and Elaine Brown, calling them "frivolous, misleading and not relevant to any matter in issue," according to court documents.

The Browns were both convicted in January on multiple tax evasion charges stemming from their decision in 1996 to stop paying federal income tax. They contend there is no law that authorizes the government to tax the wages of American citizens. The couple is scheduled for sentencing next Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Concord.

Earlier this month, the Browns both filed "what purports to be an order of this court setting aside the guilty verdicts returned by the jury and dismissing this criminal prosecution," Judge Steven McAuliffe wrote in an April 10 order that struck the Browns' filings from their court record, making the text of the original orders unavailable.

On Wednesday, McAuliffe granted a request from Elaine Brown's standby attorney to withdraw from the case.

Public Defender Bjorn Lange wrote that grounds for her dismissal as standby counsel for Elaine Brown appeared in an April 2 letter from Brown, which states that Lange's "services as stand-by attorney are no longer required, and are thus terminated as of this date," according to court records.

Lange said the prosecution's position on the matter is irrelevant because Brown has the right to represent herself.

The Browns filed an appeal after their Jan. 18 conviction, but McAuliffe rejected it, saying it was premature to file an appeal prior to sentencing, court records state. Elaine Brown has since indicated in court filings that she plans to appeal her convictions in the First Curcuit Court of Appeals following sentencing hearing.

The government has agreed not to seize or sell the Browns' home, which they built, until after the sentencing, according to court documents.

Elaine Brown was found guilty on 17 felony counts of defrauding the government, failing to withhold taxes from employees at her West Lebanon dental practice, and structuring payments to avoid taxation. Ed Brown, who stopped going to court midway through the trial, was convicted on five similar felony counts.

Since the trial, Ed Brown has been holed up in his Plainfield home, surrounded by friends and supporters.

Despite a court order that she remain in the custody of her son in Massachusetts, Elaine Brown has joined her husband in Plainfield.

Ed Brown has said he has no intention of attending the sentencing hearing next week, and U.S. Marshal Stephen Monier has indicated that the Browns will not be forced to attend.

[JosephSHaas]

To: Contact my Federal Rep. later today

RE: In WHAT Title #____ Statutes at Large Section _____ of 19___ @ page no. ___

does it require the state agent to sign?  that they shall or must,

under some mandatory requirement, that they: __________ (fill in name)

"consents to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts"*

even when they KNOW that Art.I, sec.8, Cl. 17 U.S. Const. reads that

the "consent" of the Legislature MUST be obtained BEFORE they can operate.

[N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 with filings to be** placed with the Secretary of State.]

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Private Investigator of Public Corruption

* See the "Legal Notice in The http://www.unionleader.com of last Mon.,

April 9th '07 @ page C9 for requiring that RSA 92:2 state public servant,

Mary Anzmann of http://www.nhhfa.org must sign this CONTRARY to her

state oath in order to receive $27 million in Federal Funds, to be used for

Housing starting in Fiscal year June 1st, 2007.

** HOW can a present signing occur for a future tense event? when the RSA 123:1

papers do NOT exist!?

[Dave Ridley]

thanks for posting the article kb

[JosephSHaas]

Stephen J. McAuliffe http://www.answers.com/topic/steven-j-mcauliffe

is the NEW Gestapo, trained at the Virginia Military Institute http://www.answers.com/topic/virginia-military-institute

in "the mission" of to advocate an "American Democracy".

So where does his "loyalty"* lie? with this VMI or by his oath to the
U.S. Constitution, for an Art. IV, Sec. 4 "Republic"?

The proof is in the pudding as they say.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Check this out at 2:00 o'clock p.m. today on the History Channel http://www.historychannel.com that repeats from the 8-9:00 a.m. telecast that I did see the last 1/2 of earlier this morning, of: "Gestapo: The Sword is Forged".

For SA Nazi at http://www.google.com I did find at page 1 #1 there the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung  that tells the story that:

1.) SA= Storm division, usually translated Storm troop(er)s, that "played a key role in Adolph Hitler's rise to power in the 1930s".  "SA men were often called 'brownshirts'." "Common SA practice was to swear loyalty* to LOCAL** SA commanders rather than Adolph Hitler or the Nazi Party as a whole". (emphasis ADDed).

2.) "The original purpose for the creation of the SS [Schutzstaffel, Protective Squadron] was to restrict the power of the brownshirts and its leaders." "he (Hitler) was painfully aware that the SA had the power to remove him if it so wished."

3.) The Gestapo = secret state police, was "under the overall adminstration of the Schutzstaffel (SS)."

4.) "the SA had its base among the unemployed and working class".  The "members (of the Gestapo) generally came from the middle class."

5.) "The SA...collaborated(ed) with the Communists...and Hitler ordered the execution of the leadership of the SA, which took place on June 30- July 1, 1934, and that is known as the Night of the Long Knives" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night_of_the_Long_Knives "also known as...'Operation Hummingbird'...was the lethal purge of Adolph Hitler's potential political rivals in the...SA".

NOW, here is the comparison in New Hampshire's current State-Fed Relations:

The U.S. Constitution in Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 allows the Feds to operate in this state ONLY by the "Consent" of the Legislature".  In N.H. that consent was granted in 1883 but ONLY when they/the Feds file the necessary paperwork with the Secretary of State BEFORE they purchase and operate therefrom their owned building (R.S.A. Ch. 123:1) .

There are NO such papers on file at Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State.  Our LOCAL** "SA" in the state has been ursurped by the Feds as the modern-day "Gestapo" agents TELLing us that we had better obey their dis-honor to their oaths to the Constitution or else face the NEW "Long Knives" of the U.S. Marshal.

This BULLSHIT has got to STOP!  I've taken the prosecutor, Bill Morse's boss, Tom Colantuono, as "the" member of the N.H. Bar Association to the PCC: Professional Conduct Committee (branch of the N.H. Supreme Court), but that this 9-member group is made up of a majority of lawyers over laymen in the 5 to 4 ratio, so illustrating their "protection racket" to these political hacks of the President of the United States. Currently trying to go after the Bureaucrat(s) there to see if this makes any difference with the http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm

This problem has been reported to Scott, the office manager for my NEW Federal Rep. Carol Shea-Porter at her Manchester office but I've yet to find out if she ever got my complaint, let alone if she intended to do anything about it: like to IMPEACH this judge IF he continues past this evidence I intend to present at Ed's sentencing hearing at 1:30 p.m. this Tuesday, April 24th ...

...(+/or maybe to the 11:00 a.m. one too for Elaine, me currently reading "TOIL, TAXES and TROUBLE" by Vivien Kellems, see http://www.devvy.com/vivien_20001031.html in regards to her earlier "Just Say No" that Nancy Reagan took up this slogan years later, Employer Kellems saying that to involuntary work for the I.R.S. in deducting taxes from her employees amounts to Involuntary Servitude as against the Thirteenth Amendment;...

... that Judge McAuliffe must "honor" his oath to said Constitution, and tell the U.S. Attorney to "get lost", or at least schedule a new trial, as some states (N.H. included?) have statutes on the books that if a person is sentenced in ansentia, they automatically get a new trial (to supply all the good info here like there being no T.O./Treasury Orders under the E.O./ Exucutive Orders in the Federal Register as required!) , and THEN a lawful one, as any sentence issued outside the jurisdictional authority of the court ought to bounce back upon the judge amounting to the going rate of $2,500/day of unlawful incarceration here in N.H. per the Veronia Silva case formula over at the State Board of Claims, the Browns in-effect under house arrest since January __, that ought to result in a PRIVATE Bill to Congress for $monetary damages out of that secret slush fund set up by President Grant, as reported here by that minister in Maine to the Concord court.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - -  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone).

pc: Stephen J. McAuliffe on sentencing day.

[LordBaltimore]

It's pretty ironic that you bash Nazis but praise Vivien Kellems in the same post, Joe...

There are some new court filings, Joe.  Let me know your email address if you want me to send them to you.