Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 22

[JosephSHaas]

It seems the U.L. didn't like my first 2-cent piece, and so now another one just sent:

"Jeff of Goffstown: wise up, will ya? 'The law is pretty clear' if you use your own dictionary chap! To 'lay and collect' is from the 16th Amendment. The word lay can mean either to apply or impose.  When the latter, it's to levy, whereas I prefer the former, meaning to request, as in: 'request DENIED"! (;-) So long and MAKE it a good day!"

JSH

[Sheep Fuzzy Wool]

http://www.newsdeskspecial.co.uk/2007/09/army-mutiny-rep.html

Seems like a shift in world consciousness, which could enable a positive outcome for the Brown's.

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.newsdeskspecial.co.uk/2007/09/army-mutiny-rep.html

Seems like a shift in world consciousness, which could enable a positive outcome for the Brown's.

The key word is: mutiny; defined over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutiny wherein: "U.S. military law requires obedience only to lawful orders.  Disobedience to unlawful orders is the obligation of every member of the U.S. armed forces,...."

So WHY is it: (1) that Monier's May 20th, 2002 signed OATH OF OFFICE before ______________ (Mr. Scribbles) "Chief Judge, United States District Court", District of: __________ [unknown, as that line is left blank!], is to "execute all lawful precepts", but: (2) that by Title #___ U.S. Code, "Section 566. Powers and Duties. (a) It is the primary rule and mission of the United States Marshal Service to provide for the security and to obey, execute, and enforce ALL ORDERS of the 'United States District Court'" (emphasis ADDed for every one even if unlawful +/or illegal)!?

Isn't the "Service" UNDER the Marshal?  And so by superior to inferior, the word lawful is implied from the former to the latter?  Then WHY isn't Monier doing something about these unlawful and illegal bench warrants? for Ed & Elaine Brown that lack the 1-8-17 to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 filing!

It's time for some Deputy U.S. Marshal to say enough is enough! Take the bench warrant and mark on it REFUSED for unlawfulness as NOT in compliance with Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution, and N.H. RSA Chapter 123:1, whereupon the citizen/subjects of New Hampshire have the further right of RSA Ch. 627:8 and Article 10, Part First & Bill of Rights to prevent an unlawful taking of their property, or to re-take it, and by Revolutionary means if they have to!

J.S.H.

[JosephSHaas]

Monier: you piece of shit!  You're just like this dog thief over at http://forums.somd.com/showthread.php?t=19195 You go after the loyalists to the Browns and treat them like dirt.  Shame on you!

[JosephSHaas]

Monier: you are also a sicko: defined as a psychotic: "One afflicted with a psychosis": being a "withdrawal from reality". In this case the reality of the fact that you have no jurisdiction: plain and simple, case closed!

For the words "United States Marshal" sicko, over at http://www.google.com I did find at page 1 #7 there an interesting website of http://priceofsin.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/mcculloch-v-maryland-judicial-hallucination/ about the McCulloch v. Maryland case, reported by bloach on Feb. 10, 2007 that:

"the people's desires are superior to the Federal government." and that "the people had created the Federal government and that the true nature of power rested with the people."

Although "Madison in the 'Federalist Papers...(wrote) that the state held virtually no power to check the encroachment of the federal government", just what is an encroachment? "To intrude gradually on the possessions or rights of another; trespass." To commit an offense, as compared to an omission, but see "To invade the property or rights of another without his consent." Read that Consent word as in Art. I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.  YES, the Feds are trespassers here in New Hampshire because they do not have FULL Consent.  Yes, consent was offered to them by the N.H. General Court back on June 14th (Flag Day), 1883, but that they declined to file the proper paperwork with the Office of Secretary of State as required by the shall word meaning that they must do it by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 for "concurrent jurisdiction".

An interesting case of where the Supreme Court judges of Wyoming did counter the federal actions under the Fugitive Slave Act, is mentioned by "Flash" here on June 24, 2007 at 11:09 am in that they did check-and-balance the Feds by freeing Josh Glover, with the help of newspaper editor Sherman M. Booth, back in the late 1850s, to March, 1861 when President Buchanan did pardon him from the Ableman v. Booth case in Vol. 62 U.S. Reports 506 that condemned the state for "what source"? upon which they were supposed to have derived this judicial power of habeas corpus against an Act of Congress.

But it's not an Act of Congress here for the Ed Brown co-conspirators, but the fact that the Feds are in violation of the State-Fed Contract as by 1-8-17 U.S. to 123:1 N.H. A copy of this case to give to some Superior Court judges in: Merrimack, Strafford; and Essex counties respectfully for N.H. and MAss. to see what can again make history!

J.S.H.

P.S. This website talks of separate and independent spheres, so why that "concurrent jurisdiction"?  Was that an insult to the Feds? Anyway the bottom line is this: "There can be no such thing as judicial authority unless it is conferred* by a Government or sovereignty,"  * conferred, as in consent, and as explained above, that consent never consummated, completed, achieved or perfected, of to bring together. 

[JosephSHaas]

Jail visits.

A. To visit with Danny this afternoon over at the Strafford County Jail in Dover, who put me down on his Sat-Sun. visitor list of two 1-hour visits per week, of allowed two adult visitors at a time, so if anybody else would like to join me next week + please let me know to relay the info for you to be added to the list too, or to replace my visits, like his brother Bill will do eventually from New York, so far away, me not wanting to interfere as a friend over the family at that time to bow out. Maybe they ought to transfer him to either of: Cheshire in Keene, Sullivan in Newport, or Grafton in North Haverhill, along the Vermont-New Hampshire border? to be closer to his kin.

B. I did also get a letter from Jason yesterday at the Essex County Jail in Middleton, MA where he said is where Reno is too.  Jason liked the Habeas Corpus Petition plan too, and will talk this over with his federally-appointed attorney maybe this next week to see if he might do something about it, otherwise I've still got to call that former federal prosecutor-turned legal defense counsel on Monday/ tomorrow, to see if he got my packet to him in the mail and of which inmate he'd like to blaze a path with to help the others on this angle. No word back from Bob Wolffe yet at Merrimack County in Concord.

Jason Gerhard has an inmate booking #P211914 when writing to him, and he's at: P.O. Box 807 (20 Manning Ave.), Middleton, MA 01949 (tel. # above in Reply #___) and in Block 240-C, Cell #721.  He sent me the Sept.-Oct. 07 Visiting chart with his days circled of today: Sunday, Sept. 30th @ 2:00-2:30 p.m.; then for October of: what looks like they are very accommodating by giving the friends and relatives a different day of the week each week, with the order as follows:

1. Thu., Oct. 04th Afternoon [+ Evening]
2. Mon., Oct. 08th [Columbus Day] Aft. & Eve. plus: Fri., Oct. 12th Aft. [the real holiday];
3. Tue., Oct. 16th Aft. & Eve.; plus: Saturday, October 20th Aft.;
4. Wed., Oct. 24th Aft. & Eve.;
5. Sun., Oct. 28th Aft.

The times for Block 240C are 2:00-2:30, and 7:00-7:30 for what is only a half-hour (1/2 hr.) visit, with Sign Up starting at 12:30 and 5:30 for the other Block 240D too of them getting an hour each time of between 12:30-1:30 and 5:30-6:30 p.m. with No Night Visits Fri., Sat & Sun.

Yours truly, J.S.H.

To take a few dollars to place into his commissary account too, both for Danny and Jason.  The #10 envelope from Jason being the 41-cent government embossed 3-horse envelope, and stamped in black ink: "ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY MIDDLETON, MASSACHUSETTS  THIS CORRESPONDENCE IS FORWARDED FROM THE ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, THE CONTENTS HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED AND THE ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUBSTANCE OR CONTENT OF THE ENCLOSED COMMUNICATIONS". The one to me from Jason was postmarked 28 SEP 2007, so only took one day to reach Concord, N.H.

P.S. Jason writes that:

(1) because of Ed's supposed threat against Judge McAuliffe "therefore 2 Marshals lived with him 24/7 for a long time" and so that reason for his recusal on these cases. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recusal for that example of NO recusal if like a "pay raise is applied to ALL the judges in the ENTIRE court system" (emphasis ADDed), to compare with "The principle that a judge will not be disqualified when the effect would be that no judge could hear the case is sometimes referred to as the 'rule of necessity'." BUT do the Feds NEED to be in this state? Answer: NO, and to see 1-8-17 U.S. for that they must seek "Consent" from the State Legislature, and if they don't offer it, then there is no need for them being here, and especially when offered but the Feds decline to accept our terms! In this case WHO does the disqualifying?  Not the Feds, but our own state officers, but which ones?  To start at the county level, and appeal to the N.H. Supremes, if need be, like in the Ableman v. Booth case above in 62 U.S. 506 (___) and maybe the governor himself, by his Art. 41 powers to offset by the shall word in RSA 123:1 that if not done by the Feds, re: their mandatory, by the "shall" word, filing with the Secretary of State, then if not done, then they have no jurisdiction over these victims who ought to be freed by the Petition(s) for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. - - - - -

(2) the place is overcrowded with "B.S. drug related crimes", the "new inmates sleeping in the Gym in 'canoes'" and his "cellmate is 41 years old here for drug probation violations." - - - - -

(3) to send him copies of the other indictments because he "would like to know the charges against everyone else. Out of curiosity of course" and I might add, like in the weapons charges, v.s. the private mail courier service provided by Bob Wolffe; it'll be interesting of WHO goes first to trial, starting the 2-week time of November 6th I heard in court the other day.  - - - - -

(4) He's "reading an average 100+ pages a day of books on everything. Interesting enough the first book I found in the cell when I came to Mass. was 'April Morning', about the battle of Lexington and Concord...Right now I am reading 'Restoring the American Dream' by Robert J. Ringer" (c) 1979 "At page 280 of 360 right now." See http://www.amazon.com/Restoring-American-Dream-Robert-Ringer/dp/0449243141 with a book review by L.L. Teuling "meloroze" from McAllen, TX who wrote that "His views are definitely Libertarian" but I think needs to go ONE STEP BEYOND, because he further wrote that: "He states that he believes that when people know the true, right way to things, they will DO IT RIGHT. Although I am not cynical, I believe that there are people out there who jolly well know the right thing to do and they deliberately choose NOT to do it." like maybe Monier NOT acknowledging the fact of federal non-filing, because he'd lose his job and paycheck for his house mortgage and without a new job, would be out on the streets as a homeless person. To check out Rich DeVos, the co-founder of AMWAY (with Jay VanAndle), and his wife Betsy DeVos, who, in June 1998, founded, with others, the "Restoring the American Dream" conservative political action committee (P.A.C.) to see, what, if anything, they can do in this case, like by me to find out their address to send them an information pack and invitation to the Habeas Corpus Hearing in ________ County Superior Court in _________, _______ on ___day, October ___, 2007 @ __:___ o'clock a.m./p.m. - - - - -

(5) Who is "yahkob" on what website(?) maybe, Jason's asking for his mailing address, and who wrote that "I could use his views. This is a team effort".

(6) "Also can I co-represent myself w/my lawyer? cause I want to speak, but need him for procedural issues." Thus Attny. ______ who I did write for the Habeas Corpus, he can take this separate case totally on his own, or with what's called "stand-by" counsel for the procedural, but I think to ask him questions on the witness stand, like did he read Ed's copy of our "CLAIM FOR EXECUTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF RSA 123:1"?, of June 20, 2007, etc. while over there, as Jason does "miss the food and after dinner conversations", that maybe Ed & Elaine can summarize in a document as notarized to prove to the jury of there being no criminal intent!  This is the point made to the jury before the trial, that has got to be hammered into them, like what my court-appointed attorney, Tom Rappa did an EXCELLENT job of in Grafton County Superior Court years ago for me: the trial taking only an hour, and the jury deliberating for four times that to reach a verdict of: NOT GUILTY! re: the RSA Ch. 627:8 right to use force against a police officer to re-take your property, (my political poster case during a Town Election in Ashland against the Chairwoman Hilda Harris who lost to Ed Hubbard who became a N.H. federal court bailiff) and so Ed & Elaine Brown asserting that other part of this statute, of to prevent an unlawful takeover of their property rights, and anybody helping them to be entitled to the same rights! Inscribe on the gun with the tool this NH RSA 627:8, or after talking with Bernie yesterday, maybe having some stickers printed up that Ed can autograph, and sell at the point of sale Gun Dealers. Then it cannot escape from the jury when a judge tries to keep this out of their eyes or ears!! as he/ Judge Rbt. E.K. Morrill tried to do, and did in my case! that would have saved that 4-hour deliberation time. KISS: keep it simple stupid.

(7) The statement about "some lying informant" maybe, in one paragraph of Jason's letter I won't get into detail about, re: the supply line is my guess of a purchase and then a delivery that was never made? reference what we heard in court the other day, so being prosecuted for intent(?) and so what! by our Art. 10 here in N.H.! And to be on the "alert to any new faces, these feds come in all shapes and sizes." Like to educate them to the truth is my thought that they might turn mutineer, as I did write above to evict goon Monier, and do what is right! Jason under the oath to defend the Constitution from DOMESTIC violators too, as a soldier-turned "prisoner of war. The war for freedom that is" from "Bravo Company 31st Engineering Battalion" . Him also seeing "that book that I saw on the counter one day 'What the Bible Really Teaches'" to maybe pick up and read later. http://www.amazon.co.uk/What-Bible-Really-Teaches-Fundamentalists/dp/0281056803 see the "About the Author" section at the top for: "Keith Ward as an Anglican Priest and a born-again Christian, believes that the Bible does not state itself to be inerrant and Christians should not be existing in a 'pick and chose' culture where they adapt scripture to suit their purposes." to which I add as an example that although Proverbs 6:30-31 tells us to charge the thief sevenfold the $amount stolen, it does detail in Exodus 22:1 that if it be like on the farm: an ox or a sheep, and the thief kills or sells it, to pay five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep.  The sevenfold mentioned in "Blackstone's Commentaries" to a case here in N.H. and another to the RSA Ch. 651:63 Restitution statute in our N.H. CRIMINAL CODE http://www.state.nh.us as annotated with the State v. Fleming case.  But what gets me is this attorney mentality of treble damages of three-fold!  WHY don't they use this Biblical law? put into Public Law 97-280, 96 Statute 1211 of Oct. 4, 1982 = The Year of the Bible for 1983 & beyond.

[JosephSHaas]

Visit with Danny:

--Hey Strafford County Commissioners!  It's about time you had a technician fix the phones there, i.e. the ones in the Visiting Room are crummy.  With two phones per window for each visitor, some work O.K. on this side, but are lousy on the inmate side, and vise versa, and then on the 3rd window they both worked O.K. so no wonder you try to limit the visits to two of the four windows each side A+B at a time.

--Danny is on a hunger strike without water too, having lost #__ pounds, and the jail doesn't even know it, as they do not keep track of who eats their meals completely or not.  So Bill: you're right about what you surmised in court, and have since been told too I presume, on those ITT/Pennsylvania system calls at first with $money in his account, but since switched to the collect call plan of $3.90 just to connect, and I think he said something like up to $1.00 per minute thereafter, so to get some ITT plan for withIN the state here to relay over to you of like the following:

--He did get my packet of papers that he can bring to the window with a pencil, but that we can NOT take in any writing paper nor pen/pencil writing instrument.  Some lady before me in line was told that you can't even take in a sweater or jacket.  The a.m. visiting times recommended, so said the woman guard to me today, but the 2 p.m. + visiting hour better for me, and hopefully not needed for next Sunday when he may be out on an Habeas Corpus, or sometime the following week.

--Without any $money in his account he gets up to three stamped envelopes per week, [that's been like this for decades now], with unlimited mail to the government authorities.  His plan being to have the evidence I mailed to him copied for free tonight, and maybe get a Notary Public on his Petition to the Superior Court on Monday or Tuesday, for postmark maybe on Wednesday for delivery to the court on Thursday, with the N.H. rule for a hearing within three (business?) days, and so maybe Wednesday of the following week: Oct. 10th since the Federal Columbus Day Monday screws this up.

--Me telling Danny about contacting the private attorney tomorrow/Mon., Oct. 1st to see if he wants to get on board, and maybe act as to question Bill Gardner himself, the N.H. Secretary of State on a subpoena to the fact of what he has certified: in that the Feds are in a non-filing mode to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 as required by the "shall" word in the statute, but that they have failed to file, and so to argue of no jurisdiction as the conclusion reached for his immediate release, whereupon the other three victims could likewise apply the same evidence in each of their cases too.

--The petition to the court to include that #664 page from the U.S. Attorney Manual that reads of 1-8-17 U.S. as to "embraces courthouses" so WHY didn't Tom Colantuono reply to my demand for an explanation of his remaining tight lipped?  Because on one of the days I did visit his office asking for him last week, on a Tuesday and Friday, (or maybe on the Wed., or Thu.) anyway one of these days he had Danny in the interrogation room with the big table and the goons there telling him to talk, and they'd go easier on him.  His attorney telling his client to talk, but then when Danny would make two calls to the attorney's office about this Habeas stuff, the secretary would take the call information, but that was never returned.   Then me saying if so to answer, then to make sure they structure their questions to a way that he can answer either yes or no.  This is an Article 5 N.H. religious right per James 5:12 of that yea or nay.  I claimed this once in Plymouth District Court, N.H. and the Judge Leonard Sawyer got very upset, finding me in contempt, but that only lasted until noontime of the next day when I was released after he did his deeds work so that I wouldn't ask him for a ride.  The attorney Jack McCormack from Ashland who was drilling me, giving me the ride back an hour away when we met at the Country Store, owned by the Deputy Clerk there, Rose. McCormack calling me to the witness stand then asking me: what is your name? Me telling him that he sure must have gone senile fast, as he just call me!  The judge instructing me to answer the question with the words of my name.  Me saying: no! for the attorney to structure it: Is your name Mr. Haas? yes or not, but that the judge would have none of that!  Too bad for that Wednesday Night Court shenanigans is what I called it.

--So Tom Colantuono: wise up! You KNOW the truth but are now classified as one of these sociopaths too needing medical attention; and the sooner the better! Stop ASKing questions and start ANSWERing them! I mean it! Same goes for the others being grilled too; no doubt about it.  You are my Public Servants and I DEMAND an answer from you of WHY you think you have jurisdiction when your very own U.S. Attorney Manual says you do not!  When these inmate victims are released, you will pay: mark my words!

J.S.H.

[JosephSHaas]

Marshal Monier declared insane.

This is the headline of what might be the case, and it would not be a first:

Back on Sept. 6th, 1894, The "New York Times" reported on the Sept. 5th incident in Wayne, West Va. where United States Marshal Vinson "attempted to address the crowd" after Ex-Gov. Wilson did speak during his campaign to succeed a Senator Camden for that office in the U.S. Senate. "There was hooting and yelling, and one of Vinson's deputies fired a revolver. The firing then became general, then all of them joining in it, and it is charged, but denied, that Vinson fired several shots...(including the) shot that killed (William) Frygel", a supporter of the ex governor Wilson. "[F]riends (of Vinson) claim he is insane". "Vinson and his men jump on their horses and fled..(by taking) refuge in Kentucky." This was after "A posse is after Vinson and all his deputies with warrants charging them with murder."

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9C05E3DB1531E033A25755C0A96F9C94659ED7CF

J.S.H.

The big question is: WHAT did ex-Gov. Wilson and/or his supporter Wm. Frygel say? that got Vinson so riled up as to go berserk?  Maybe that he was a sociopath?  and when Wilson was to confirm the next appointee of the President's pick for U.S. Marshal it will NOT be Vinson, as he is a liar? Like Monier here: a liar to his oath to support the United States Constitution, including 1-8-17 thereof, but when he is confronted with the truth of no federal filing to RSA Ch. 123:1 he lets the lie stand: the warrants issued withOUT jurisdiction! when the truth is that he was supposed to send back a "non est return" to the court within #__ months with the reason for his failure to serve the precept being that it is unlawful and illegal, and the U.S. Attorney knows it by his very own Manual #664, and so a clear RICO case of crookedness withIN the in-justice system needing extraction therefrom by the appointing power that wrongly put them there, or by a check-and-balance, that if the governor won't act by his Art. 41 powers, then for that other branch withIN the state to say: yes, the Legislators offered jurisdiction to the Feds back on June 14, 1883 but that they declined.  They have no power to imprison the four helpers to Ed Brown in his Art. 10 battles to win this war of Rebellion as of right, and so the next battle toward a win of this war being the battlefield over in the Strafford County courthouse, on the Danny Riley Petition for an Habeas Corpus.

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/14132485/detail.html

From: Spiker, to my inbox:

Federal Prosecutor Arrested in Child Sex Sting - Local News Story - WDIV Detroit.

[LordBaltimore]

--Danny is on a hunger strike without water too

If that were true, he'd be dead by now.  Going without water for more than three days is suicide.

[JosephSHaas]

--Danny is on a hunger strike without water too

If that were true, he'd be dead by now.  Going without water for more than three days is suicide.

Anyways, that's what he said. On a hunger strike since he got in there? and maybe started the water strike too on yesterday's day and time, I didn't question of when the water strike started.  So when he goes to court he'll be so dehydrated that the papers he mailed will have to speak for him?

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_strike "In the first 3 days the body is still using energy from glucose.  After that, the liver starts processing body fat.  After 3 weeks the body enters in 'starvation mode'.  At this point the body 'mines' the muscles and vital organs for energy.  The estimated limit of resistance is 60 days."

[VEPR]

Maybe someone can give me an explanation to one of their charges. How can one be charged with using a firearm in commission of a violent crime if a violent crime hasn't been committed yet. I'm just beginning my research into this story. Seems as though Brown is a lunatic and his wife is unfortunate to be involved(she seems like a nice lady). I personally don't see a problem with the way the Marshalls are pursuing this man. They seem to be showing restraint in terms of what they could do if they wanted to. I also see that Mr Brown has been spouting this rhetoric for over a decade now and was never bothered until he was convicted of this crime he committed. I see quite a few people on here support the Browns. Am I missing something?? I just think the message of freedom that many on here believe in would be better served in not showing this man support. I'm willing to listen if anyone wants to explain this to me.

[JosephSHaas]

Maybe someone can give me an explanation to one of their charges. How can one be charged with using a firearm in commission of a violent crime if a violent crime hasn't been committed yet. I'm just beginning my research into this story. Seems as though Brown is a lunatic and his wife is unfortunate to be involved(she seems like a nice lady).

I personally don't see a problem with the way the Marshalls are pursuing this man. They seem to be showing restraint in terms of what they could do if they wanted to. (*)

I also see that Mr Brown has been spouting this rhetoric for over a decade now and was never bothered until he was convicted of this crime he committed. I see quite a few people on here support the Browns. Am I missing something?? I just think the message of freedom that many on here believe in would be better served in not showing this man support. I'm willing to listen if anyone wants to explain this to me.

Thanks VEPR.

Yes, the Marshals are using "restraint", as in to keep their cool, under the word "control", but WHO really controls them? The state controls the feds by the "Consent" word in 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution. If there is no consent, as there is none by N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 with the federal non-filing over at Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State, then that IS the "check" and balance, as that check word is for the definition of the word restrain, meaning also: "To limit or restrict." From the Latin word restringere, to bind(*) back, RESTRICT.

Read my Reply #___ above about Martin J. "Red" Beckman, who came to New Hampshire in the 1980s running for President, with his 1/2 hour info-mercials on WMUR-TV Channel 9 in Manchester @ 7:30-8:00 p.m. (the game show time) over to his meetings at the then Highway Hotel in Concord where the U.S. Marshals would go too, to be told again and again that the government is the beast in the cage as enclosed by the bars of the Constitution. To limit means to confine too, or restrict within limits, from the Latin word limes, boundary.  To confine meaning to imprison too, defined as "To put in or as if in prison".  So what really gets me is that of when the judge orders the defendant into the custody of the Marshal, the Marshal automatically thinks of the cinder block prison, and so limits his very thinking. Plus the fact that he, the Marshal himself, has broken out of his imprisonment, but pretending to have been in compliance with his oath of office, when just the opposite is the case.  He's a hypocrite.  MARSHAL MONIOR IS A HYPOCRITE! Plain and simple. Case closed.  Back off you bastard!

See also that restrict word of: "To hold down" as in to hold down a job, but from WHERE above did it originate?  With the boss of course.  And who is Monier's boss?  It was the President who appointed him with the consent of the Senate, but who voted the Senators into office?, but we the people withIN the state, and by what contract is there between the fed and state relations?  The State-Fed Relations Committee of the House here in Concord are made up of goons too! Do they counter check this federal crap? No, they like to wallow or revel, take great pleasure or delight in the downfall of their fellow man being pounced on by a beast out of control!  How sick there are: every damn one of them! From the OF reveler word of to make noise, "rebel" as in a rebellion, but rebellious from what? Resisting control alright: the very control of the Constitution and their RSA Ch. 92:2 oaths of office. Unruly: difficult or impossible to govern. 

Technically the word rebel in the verb is "To refuse allegiance to and oppose by force an established government OR ruling authority." (emphasis ADDed, because Ed is not opposed to the N.H. Constitution, and its government allowance and even suggestion to use Art. 10 when appropriate, but when the ruling authority withIN the government are the bad apples needing to be "taken out"! as when they are the unruly ones, NOT playing by the rules, as in 1-8-17 and 123:1. And then when the state, county and locals take federal funds to use against the Browns!?  Well that is the ultimate insult! them deserving of being fired right then and now! Impeach the bastard governor for not doing his Art. 41 duty to enforce all legislative mandates by the shall word in RSA 123:1. House Bill of Impeachment #___ for 2009, because no State Rep had the guts to file before last month's deadline. And we've got to live with this crummy governor until he's next voted out of office!?  You have got to be shitting me!

JSH

(*) to bind: "3. To hold or restrain. 4. To compel, as with a sense of duty." 5. To place under a legal obligation."

[JosephSHaas]

Jail visits...

(5) Who is "yahkob" on what website(?) maybe, Jason's asking for his mailing address, and who wrote that "I could use his views. This is a team effort"....

http://mp3.wtprn.com/Badnarik07.html

See the Program #106 of Tue., Sept. 18 '07 for cohosts: Ed & Elaine (of the family/clan Brown) of "I fought the IRS Week" - Day Three, where this yahkob is from ________, Pennsylvania, and has been a caller since August 21st, and to Program #108 too on Tue., Sept. 20 '07 where it's even mentioned that he "hasn't paid income taxes for thirty-three years".

JSH

[Raineyrocks]

http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/14132485/detail.html

From: Spiker, to my inbox:

Federal Prosecutor Arrested in Child Sex Sting - Local News Story - WDIV Detroit.

Wow, I bet this is your shortest post ever!