• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 22

Started by (V), September 15, 2007, 01:32 AM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

JosephSHaas

Quote from: raineyrocks on October 01, 2007, 01:02 PM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 01, 2007, 08:25 AM NHFT
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/14132485/detail.html

From: Spiker, to my inbox:

Federal Prosecutor Arrested in Child Sex Sting - Local News Story - WDIV Detroit.

Wow, I bet this is your shortest post ever! ;D

It would be longer IF I only had the goods on any of the U.S. Marshals, like maybe Monier, being the sociopath he is, dresses up like that "snack fairy" in the TV commercial.  You do know that J. Edgar Hoover of the F.B.I. is supposed to have done something like this right?  Maybe their job is so stressful, that they've got to believe in like tinker bell to the rescue to pixelate the opposition http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pixelate like in that 1936 movie of: "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town" starring Gary Cooper http://frothy.wordpress.com/ see paragraph #2 "a small-town tuba player who inherits $30 million from a distant relative and ultimately decides to give it all away once he realizes how many vultures want a piece of it." with Jean Arthur as the reporter out to sell newspapers and for that free vacation.

JSH

Raineyrocks

Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 01, 2007, 01:27 PM NHFT
Quote from: raineyrocks on October 01, 2007, 01:02 PM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 01, 2007, 08:25 AM NHFT
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/14132485/detail.html

From: Spiker, to my inbox:

Federal Prosecutor Arrested in Child Sex Sting - Local News Story - WDIV Detroit.

Wow, I bet this is your shortest post ever! ;D

It would be longer IF I only had the goods on any of the U.S. Marshals, like maybe Monier, being the sociopath he is, dresses up like that "snack fairy" in the TV commercial.  You do know that J. Edgar Hoover of the F.B.I. is supposed to have done something like this right?  Maybe their job is so stressful, that they've got to believe in like tinker bell to the rescue to pixelate the opposition http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pixelate like in that 1936 movie of: "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town" starring Gary Cooper http://frothy.wordpress.com/ see paragraph #2 "a small-town tuba player who inherits $30 million from a distant relative and ultimately decides to give it all away once he realizes how many vultures want a piece of it." with Jean Arthur as the reporter out to sell newspapers and for that free vacation.

JSH

Yup I've read about Hoover dressing up like a woman.  It sounds like a sting operation is in order to catch them, doesn't it?  I thought Mr. Deeds starred Adam Sandler, oh okay, there was an older version of that movie but what does that have to do with Monier?

JosephSHaas

Quote from: raineyrocks on October 01, 2007, 02:34 PM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 01, 2007, 01:27 PM NHFT
Quote from: raineyrocks on October 01, 2007, 01:02 PM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 01, 2007, 08:25 AM NHFT
....

Yup I've read about Hoover dressing up like a woman.  It sounds like a sting operation is in order to catch them, doesn't it?  I thought Mr. Deeds starred Adam Sandler, oh okay, there was an older version of that movie but what does that have to do with Monier?

Monier lives in "Never-Never" land.  He will never get Ed Brown into custody, so he might as well give up now.  As they say in one of those sci-fi TV shows: resistance is futile; Resistance to the basic law in the Constitution that is.  Monier is in some kind of melt-down mode, like Margaret Hamilton as the Wicked Witch of the West in "The Wizard of Oz".  His arrest warrants aren't worth a hill of beans, as they say. Plus yes, I did like that other Deeds movie too, with Drew Barrymore, Lionel's grand-daughter?  Happy Sailing to you too. -- JSH

armlaw

[quote
http://www.ushistory.org/betsy/more/10834.htm but that there is nothing there on the gold-fringed flag.

My research years ago, after N.H. State Rep. Dick Marple of Hooksett, a retired State Trooper and my friend for decades, put a House Bill #_________ in on this that went nowhere other than to get that one out of the Reps Hall so that he would not make a scene every so often, them keeping the others in each of the Public Hearing rooms, to where I commented once that from Dick's paperwork I found out that it's by some Army Regulation #___ that it can be displayed but only when a military flag is in its presence. 

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell
phone).

[/quote]

Please read  RSA 3-E:1 "Display of United States Flag" as signed into law by Governor Shaheen Unfortnuately a penalty for failure to perform was not included/\.

armlaw

Quote from: JosephSHaas on September 28, 2007, 11:36 PM NHFT

"Plain error occurs only when the error is clear and obvious* and effects substantial rights" U.S. v. Wolfe, 245 F.3d 257, 261 (3rd Cir. 2001).

*It's obvious by the U.S. Attorney Manual 664, that 1-8-17 "embraces courthouses"! including the Warren B. Rudman Building, in Concord, New Hampshire.

http://vls.law.villanova.edu/locator/3d/April2007/061077np.pdf

"Substantial rights are affected if the error was sufficiently prejudicial to affect the outcome of the trial."

The U.S. District Court in Concord, N.H. is withOUT "jurisdiction"! Our state offered them "concurrent jurisdiction" back on June 14, 1883, but that they declined!

JSH


The "United States District Court" is not the Article III constitutional "district court of the United States". See, Mookini  v. United States, 303 U.S. 201, where definition is specific as to syntax. No where in Title 28 U.S. Code can be found "criminal jurisdiction" for a USDC. Original jurisdiction for all crimes against the United States is delegated in 18 USC 3231 to "district courts of the United States". Accordingly, the Concord court is a mere administrative Tribunal without criminal jurisdiction. Those who have conspired to practice such criminal action,without jurisdiction, have abandoned their office and exposed themselves to hazard of civil action. Civil action has been delegated to the USDC in Title 28 but no such delegation of criminal action. If there is, show me!

armlaw

Quote from: VEPR on October 01, 2007, 09:54 AM NHFT
Maybe someone can give me an explanation to one of their charges. How can one be charged with using a firearm in commission of a violent crime if a violent crime hasn't been committed yet. I'm just beginning my research into this story. Seems as though Brown is a lunatic and his wife is unfortunate to be involved(she seems like a nice lady). I personally don't see a problem with the way the Marshalls are pursuing this man. They seem to be showing restraint in terms of what they could do if they wanted to. I also see that Mr Brown has been spouting this rhetoric for over a decade now and was never bothered until he was convicted of this crime he committed. I see quite a few people on here support the Browns. Am I missing something?? I just think the message of freedom that many on here believe in would be better served in not showing this man support. I'm willing to listen if anyone wants to explain this to me.


See Reply #5877 on: Today at 08:58 PM... This can be a start for your enlightenment

kola

So... the feds did their mock attack on the Browns when they fired rounds and shook a trailer. They observed the reaction and got plenty of valuable information. That was the goal. Then they prevented outsiders from visiting the Browns for the party and topped it off by arresting 4 people. What's next?

Any thoughts?

Kola

JosephSHaas

Quote from: armlaw on October 01, 2007, 08:43 PM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on September 28, 2007, 11:36 PM NHFT

...
The U.S. District Court in Concord, N.H. is withOUT "jurisdiction"! Our state offered them "concurrent jurisdiction" back on June 14, 1883, but that they declined!

JSH


The "United States District Court" is not the Article III constitutional "district court of the United States". See, Mookini  v. United States, 303 U.S. 201, where definition is specific as to syntax. No where in Title 28 U.S. Code can be found "criminal jurisdiction" for a USDC. Original jurisdiction for all crimes against the United States is delegated in 18 USC 3231 to "district courts of the United States". Accordingly, the Concord court is a mere administrative Tribunal without criminal jurisdiction. Those who have conspired to practice such criminal action,without jurisdiction, have abandoned their office and exposed themselves to hazard of civil action. Civil action has been delegated to the USDC in Title 28 but no such delegation of criminal action. If there is, show me!

So what happens next? The Ed Brown co-conspirators actually the victims of fraud, and so to hire an attorney(s) to sue the sitting judges there of: Barbadoro, McAuliffe and DiClerico for wrongfully asserting criminal jurisdiction over them, with the real co-conspirators being: Tom Colantuono and Stephen Monier in the U.S. Attorney's and U.S. Marshal's Offices respectfully?  WHO will be the judge to preside over such a jury trial?  It looks like the President has got to make an appointment to the right court, named The District Court of the United States, for criminal jurisdiction to be asserted, and AFTER that U.S. Supreme Court case contesting that committee of conference that wrongly passed the Criminal Code withOUT authority of the full House or Senate! In the meantime, what?  The President to also appoint before then some new judges to the U.S. District Court so that the lawsuit can start?

pc: our Federal Reps Hodes and Shea-Porter. To first impeach these usurpers, and then confirm whoever the President nominates.

JSH

JosephSHaas

Quote from: kola on October 01, 2007, 09:50 PM NHFT
So... the feds did their mock attack on the Browns when they fired rounds and shook a trailer. They observed the reaction and got plenty of valuable information. That was the goal. Then they prevented outsiders from visiting the Browns for the party and topped it off by arresting 4 people. What's next?

Any thoughts?

Kola

One of the U.S. Marshals is going to just disappear.

Like what happened to "A DEPUTY MARSHAL MISSING  STRANGE DISAPPEARANCE OF JOHN BURNS"  New York Times, January 29, 1878, Wednesday.

See http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10816FE3F5A127B93CBAB178AD85F4C8784F9

coffeeseven

#249
From the Showedthelaw Blog:

QuotePlease Show Your Support.
Monday, October 1, 2007
Hi Voterescuers!

As some of you may know, one of our longest-standing and most dedicated members of VoteRescue, Terry Melton, recently underwent a trauma when he was arrested in a raid in New York related to his work on a video about Ed and Elaine Brown. The Browns are tax protesters in New Hampshire whose home is surrounded by federal agents; they will not surrender to authorities to serve their sentences for non-payment of income tax because...there is no law that says we really have to pay income tax.

Terry courageously took several trips to the Browns before access to their home was blocked by "authorities" and videotaped interviews with them and is working on a film about their situation.

Just after 9/11, Terry was with a friend of the Browns and was caught up in a raid of that person's home, abusively treated, and had his life threatened by a federal marshall. He was literally told that if he ever told anything about the Browns or their story, let alone make a film about them, the agent would hunt him down and kill him even if it took 15 years.

As you can imagine, this has had a traumatic effect on Terry. He did, however, immediately come back and get on the radio and tell the entire story, and continues to work on the film about the Browns. A true patriot, he "will not stop" in his quest to get the truth out about the Browns, just as he does for us at VoteRescue with election fraud issues.

Terry is struggling financially at the moment and is in the process of looking for regular employment. In the meantime, if you could help him out with a donation to help him pay his rent & bills for October, any contribution would be appreciated. This assistance is needed IMMEDIATELY, however. Please send whatever you can, $10, $25, or (or whatever you can afford, in a check made out to Terry Melton. His address is below:

9807 North FM 620 #20202
Austin, Texas 78726

Many thanks to you!

Vickie and Karen

That address looks kind of.........governmental? Probably not. I don't know anything about Austin, Texas addresses.

Also here be a goodie:

http://whatistaxed.com/

KBCraig

Quote from: coffeeseven on October 02, 2007, 03:19 AM NHFT
QuoteTerry Melton. His address is below:

9807 North FM 620 #20202
Austin, Texas 78726

That address looks kind of.........governmental? Probably not. I don't know anything about Austin, Texas addresses.

Nope. Just a big apartment complex:

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=9807+North+FM+620,+austin,+tx&ie=UTF8&ll=30.437593,-97.837265&spn=0.004246,0.009785&t=h&z=17&om=1


JosephSHaas

Quote from: coffeeseven on October 02, 2007, 03:19 AM NHFT
From the Showedthelaw Blog:

Quote...

Just after 9/11, Terry* was with a friend of the Browns and was caught up in a raid of that person's home, abusively treated, and had his life threatened by a federal marshall. He was literally told that if he ever told anything about the Browns or their story, let alone make a film about them, the agent would hunt him down and kill him even if it took 15 years.

As you can imagine, this has had a traumatic effect on Terry. He did, however, immediately come back and get on the radio and tell the entire story, and continues to work on the film about the Browns. A true patriot, he "will not stop" in his quest to get the truth out about the Browns, just as he does for us at VoteRescue with election fraud issues....

...

http://whatistaxed.com/

WHO was this Deputy Marshal**?  Name, rank, and serial number please. Out of WHAT office? He needs to be taught a lesson in manners! of just "Who's the Boss?".

For the words: government agent manners, at the http://www.google.com search engine, see page 1 #1 there of the WHERE OLD MEN REALLY ARE OSLERIZED story about "Government Agent and Teacher Tells of Strange Customs and Beliefs Among Eskimos on Diomede Island in Bering Strait" The "New York Times", June 13, 1920, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10A16F8385E157A93C1A8178DD85F448285F9 and in particular that "His Life Endangered" section in column #2 of 4 under the drawing of Mrs. Arthur Elde and Her Child, actually the paragraph just above and below that, about "the wild tum-tum".

This Deputy Marshal** needs some words spoken to him too, and backed up by the tum-tum!  >:D "Every word and sound he (the medicine man) uttered was punctuated by the hammer of the drum;".

JSH

-* Terry Melton
9807 North FM 620 #20202
Austin, Texas 78726

[sending him $____ to buy some drums!  8) ]
for a music donation in turn to:

** Deputy U.S. Marshal, ____________
of: ______________________________.

Dave Ridley



Bald Eagle

Quote from: JosephSHaas on September 28, 2007, 11:15 PM NHFT
The ingredients of such a person? see:
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Great.  So someone please explain to me how nonviolent noncooperation gets us anywhere with these incurable amoral monsters.

Not that anyone hasn't noticed, but there are a lot of these people running things and getting hired to capitalize on just the sort of traits that make them dangerous to the rest of us.  The inmates really are in control of the asylum.

How do you wrest control from them and put them back into the restraints without taking a position of power and "initiating force"?  They're more animal than human.  You might as well go on safari with a sign that reads, "Hungry lions, please don't eat me."

These are the people that Revelation and Atlas Shrugged warned us about.