Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 25

[LordBaltimore]

And while I'm poking around PACER, Joe, here is Wolffe's entry regarding the change of plea.

11/26/2007   NOTICE OF HEARING as to Robert Wolffe: Change of Plea Hearing set for 12/7/2007 01:30 PM before Chief Judge George Z. Singal at the Rudman Courthouse, Concord, NH. (dae) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

[JosephSHaas]

And while I'm poking around PACER, Joe, here is Wolffe's entry regarding the change of plea.

11/26/2007   NOTICE OF HEARING as to Robert Wolffe: Change of Plea Hearing set for 12/7/2007 01:30 PM before Chief Judge George Z. Singal at the Rudman Courthouse, Concord, NH. (dae) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

Thanks Richard.  Maybe before then the F.B.I. Portland office will advise him of their investigation that New Hampshire is in non-compliance with Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution to N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 and that he ought to stop wasting taxpayer money into non-jurisdictional waters.  To call the FBI in a few minutes (from Reply #____ above) and report back to here with what they say in the modification this this.* -- Joe

Modification.  See Reply #___ on page #__ here for a typing of my letter to the F.B.I. in Portland, Maine. It's on page 9 of my Archives as #121 to be exact, at the top of the page for Friday., Nov. 2nd of almost four (4) weeks ago @ 1:46 p.m.  At the 1-207-774-9322 # from the http://boston.fbi.gov/me.htm website I told the receptionist I was disappointed that they never even acknowledged receipt of my Nov. 2 '07 letter; she immediately referred me over to Mr. ________ who never gave me his name, (not that I cared to ask anyway) him saying that he will not investigate to prove that N.H. is in non-compliance to advise his Maine judge Singal that he ought not to travel into non-jurisdictional waters, and that it is up to a Congressional Investigation since these are Legislative courts.  I told him that I've already tried that, by contacting my Federal Reps [Shea-Porter first and then Hodes, plus Sununu gave me the Fed AOC #, and Gregg just a plain waste of time] but that they don't care to correct their wrongs.  Neither do the state, county nor town officers care to check-and-balance, as by the governor to assert his Art. 41 powers to enforce all legislative mandates as by the "shall" word in RSA Ch. 123:1, and so of course what is the only result being of to live in a lie, of Wonderland, seeing Alice Rabbits and Mad Hatters, etc., or standing on your own turf with the truth but the liars come to get you anyway!

Dis-gusted, -- Joe, with Art. 10 Rights of Revolution, but when you exercise them, they say wrong apparatus, as in what? to exercise them in some OTHER state!?  You have got to be shitting me!

[JosephSHaas]

....

11/26/2007 ....

... him saying that he will not investigate to prove that N.H. is in non-compliance to advise his Maine judge Singal that he ought not to travel into non-jurisdictional waters, and that it is up to a Congressional Investigation since these are Legislative courts....

Here's a re-type of my e-mail letter of exactly 5:00 p.m. today;

"To: Federal Representative Tom Allen
1127 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202: 225-5590
Fax: 202: 225-5590
[e-mail: rep.tomallen at mail.house.gov ]

http://www.nrcm.org/congressionaldelegation.asp

Dear Rep. Allen:

--This is to follow-up my call to your office this afternoon a few minutes ago where your secretary was nice enough to tell me that you're in Maine now, and back to work in Washington, D.C. next week, and as a member on the: (1) Budget, and (2) Energy & Commerce Committees.

--That's 'very' appropriate since what I'd like to see is more efficiency in the federal government for my tax dollars as extracted by my boss at work.  I too own some land in Maine and used to live in Blue Hill.

--Now here's what I'd like for you to investigate, as like to start a Congressional Investigation of ALL fifty (50) states maybe, but to start somewhere, and that is for this Maine-New Hampshire connection, of WHY is it that Portland Maine Judge George Singal is coming to the New Hampshire court when he should realize that N.H. is in non-compliance with Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.  He was given the ball as they say for the Ed Brown anti-I.R.S. co-conspirator cases to deal with pre-trial motions, and so in a way: GREAT that he from an in-compliance state might travel over here to a non-filing state to tell us to get our act together, in that there are none of the required filings by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the state statute.

--Attorney Larry Becraft from Alabama has a website of these single, and double filing states, with N.H. and MAss. in non-compliance (Florida too, to the governor's office), but Vermont + Maine in compliance by the mere filing of their deeds with the Registrar of Deeds in these single-filing states.

--Is there a special fund that these monies come out of?  And if so, can that person accept some audit of these funds to like send the bill against the judge's salary in N.H. who should have done internal correction in the first place?

--Your comments and suggestions are most welcome, and for details on this, see my Reply #6719 over at page 448 at http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.6705 reference the Portland, Maine F.B.I. agent telling me to contact you, as the only one of four listed without having to jump over the website hurdle to get your e-mail address.

Thank you, - - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone)."

JSH

P.S. The website was (past tense) working, but not now, for all four; so see http://tomallen.house.gov/

[keith in RI]

joe what are the odds that you could post a list of current events so to speak? i know you are busy as hell but i think it would be a nice thing to have. im talking about all the "events" that are currently pending. in other words say list for example:

complaint filed with postal service over mail not delivered......
contact person info......
next course of action........
what we can do  ie: call in support??

complaint filed with tom allen @......
next courseof action....
what we can do....

lawyer so and so contacted waiting for reply....

its just that you post a lot of stuff  asking us to call in support or whatever and i think some of it gets lost in the shuffle of these posts. a nice listing would be useful, a checklist so to speak....

[JosephSHaas]

Keith,  As they say in jail: Money Talks, and Bullshit Walks.

Or in other words, we can call all these lawyers to try to help Ed & Elaine, but unless they go "Pro Bono" that they harp about being there for the indigent, but that's all I hear from them is harps, no brass band for a victory march, then the only way is to get what was stolen from them returned, and some stuff sold, to pay these "friggin' gladiators", more like "Beefeaters" wanting the top of the line, us to eat beans in the meantime, then we've got to get some phone calls going to the U.S. Attorney's office at 225-1552 Attn: Kim Cooper on Forfeiture ext. #2667 and just ask for a Progress Report of have they gotten over that Treasury Agent's name and # to David's sister for a visit to extract the exempt items under the homestead act? Has anybody gone to the property/ies to see whose name is listed as the contact person?  If they don't reply soon, then an RSA Ch. 627:8 action ought to take place with David as the next of kin, with Sheriff back-up to break the Fed locks and re-take his parents' property! The State Police too, now on OUR side! You just don't take over a property and then stop playing the game.  The rules require that the exemption items be given over to that estate woman with the POA from Elaine, as in the tens of thousands of dollars worth of dental equipment at her business. The tools of her trade that she can maybe sell to some new doctor or rent, the Marshals, what? waiting for a dentist to take over with all equipment included in the sale? Them jumping over the homestead exemptions! Land lupers!  -- Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Falling Cinder Blocks:

I don't see it in the on-line version of The http://www.concordmonitor.com under the Opinion section for Letters to the Editor, but yesterday's actual newspaper had at page B9 some letter from a female inmate in Strafford County Jail at Dover (up from the Womens Prison in Goffstown as over-crowded) tell of them eating their meal in the pod one day and two cinder blocks just fell from the ceiling: one hit a woman on the head, and the other one hit a woman in the face, ripping her skin off. No kiddin'!

-- Joe

[JosephSHaas]

joe what are the odds that you could post a list of current events so to speak? i know you are busy as hell but i think it would be a nice thing to have. im talking about all the "events" that are currently pending. in other words say list for example:

complaint filed with postal service over mail not delivered......(*)
contact person info......
next course of action........
what we can do  ie: call in support??

complaint filed with tom allen @......
next courseof action....
what we can do....

lawyer so and so contacted waiting for reply....

its just that you post a lot of stuff  asking us to call in support or whatever and i think some of it gets lost in the shuffle of these posts. a nice listing would be useful, a checklist so to speak....

(*) Bob's working on this.  When I saw him Wednesday, he said that he used to work for the Post Office for three years, and so the reason for why he started this private mail service for Ed.

He's been in contact with the Kathy Royal U.S. Postal Inspector superior here in New Hampshire and is going to subpoena her in on his case, or do a deposition of her +/or whoever her underling was that buckled under to whoever from the Marshals who told her a lie that they were empowered to ask and for the P.O. to say: how high to jump over their request.   This is one case they do not want to get to trial, and so are doing their darndest to get him to plea to something.  Bob says there's no way in hell that the Marshals had any power over the Postal Service to stop the mail from being delivered.  I don't know all the details, but if there would have been a suspected package as like it ticking or something, then they could pull it out of the line, but as the saying goes: by sleet, snow nor gloom of night, etc. the gloom being the maybe boogeyman?  Maybe just doesn't cut it, but did in this case, and totally unlawful, especially when they are both unlawful and illegal! as without the NH RSA Ch. 123:1 papers from 1-8-17 U.S. Const.   - - Joe

[Raineyrocks]

Falling Cinder Blocks:

I don't see it in the on-line version of The http://www.concordmonitor.com under the Opinion section for Letters to the Editor, but yesterday's actual newspaper had at page B9 some letter from a female inmate in Strafford County Jail at Dover (up from the Womens Prison in Goffstown as over-crowded) tell of them eating their meal in the pod one day and two cinder blocks just fell from the ceiling: one hit a woman on the head, and the other one hit a woman in the face, ripping her skin off. No kiddin'!

-- Joe

Geesh, that's disturbing!  Do you think phone calls and letters will help?

[JosephSHaas]

Update: All the mail that was supposed to be delivered to Ed & Elaine Brown at 401 Center of Town Road in Plainfield, N.H. 03781 before their arrest last month on Thu., Oct. 4th (yes -- still only a month ago on the calendar that is).

I did just call Kathy Royal, the N.H. "Manager" of "Consumer Affairs" is her real title, at 603: 626-6818 and got a recording that she's on vacation from Nov. 26th - Dec. 3rd and to call 644-4152.

I did call that # and it gave me two options: Press 1 to speak to a live person, or #2 to leave a message.  I chose #2 first and left a short message only alloyed after your name and telephone number, and since I was cut off in mid-sentence I called back and pressed #1 and spoke with Mary Ann, who said that her boss, Lori Houghton, the Acting Manager was on the phone, but that I told her what was going on, or rather what was NOT going on.

I did tell her that this has been over 60 days now, that I have yet to either have my insured letter with the $50.00 bill and papers, insured for $100.00 delivered or returned, and she asked WHY I didn't complain about this sooner.  I said I have made #numerous complaints! She asked me what the # was, I said I've temporarily lost it, but she did say that the P.O. keeps their records for up to 30 days, and YES- I did ask about this BEFORE the 30 days but that they gave me the excuse that they needed the number!  So WHO is lieing or doesn't know HOW to do their job!?

I did tell her that this is a bunch of crap! My letter was non-lethal, and with the technology we have today, they can determine that, and either deliver the mail or open it to prove as non-lethal, or what? They're securing iit n the bomb room of the "Inspector Service"? so that if something starts ticking and goes off that it won't cause damage to them?  What about me and my letter, don't I have rights too to be as far away from any such ticking bomb package? And they put my mail within such a pile?  WHEN are they going to open up the real suspected packages?  Are they waiting for some Order from the Court on a Search Warrant to open up ALL the mail sent to Ed BEFORE his arrest?  Do I have a say in the matter as to get this process speeded up? WHO is this Postal Officer who took the Marshal's recommendation to halt?  And where plus when and how was this communicated? by phone call(s) and/or letter(s)? From and TO whom? And did the Marshals verify that they have the authority to even request such?  Where is their Secretary of State receipt of the RSA Ch. 123:1 papers, if any, from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution? They have none, and this whole theft is unlawful and illegal. Harm on delivery to the Browns, protecting them? You have got to be shitting me! When Bernie went to the Town Office to complain of to either return the property taxes, or protect the Browns from an outlaw federal government they said right there and in writing later in the Selectmen's Meeting Minutes that they will do neither!  Now who is running a Protection Racket here!?  Where is the F.B.I.? Are we getting what we pay for in taxes!?  My boss pays my federal taxes for me and I see only theft of my rights! and Ed the theft of his property: his $50.00 bill, that could have started a legal defense toward either preliminary actions to work on getting an attorney to handle the Habeas if/when he be captured like he was, +/or to go for the Mistrial Motion.

I did tell Mary Ann that Gary DiMartino, the Deputy U.S. Marshal gave me the excuse that my #10 envelope might have had a fuse in it, so WHY did I get my regular #10 envelope back a few days ago to a week to 10 days ago now from Bill Abbott in person at his office, see my Archives here @ page 7 #102 for Nov. 7th @ 11:41 a.m. over to page 5 #67 for Nov. 15 @ 11:40 a.m. search word: Royal; but NOT this insured #10 envelope with all the colorful stickers on it, that ought to stand out like a sore thumb!?

I did get the message from Mary Ann, that Lori was listening to my message that I had sent earlier, and that she is to get a message over to the "Inspection Service" in: ___________ ? Attn: ___________ Tel. # (__) __________ and when "they" get back to her, she will get back to me.  So Keith: maybe after a week to 10 days wait of more time, to call her again next week for yet another "Progress Report" or better yet: Bob Wolffe to subpoena these lazy bastards to a deposition to find out WHO stopped the mail on who's suggestion and order, and WHY didn't the Postal Service demand of that Marshal the authority to even ask such a request!?  Go for it Bob, nail these thieves, that they will only call themselves temporary thieves in that the mail will eventually be either delivered or returned to the sender in shreds, or so and so indicted for maybe sending explosives through the mail?  You've got to have all of this information BEFORE you decide to enter a plea, and so to get them to act faster BEFORE your Jan. 28th trial day.  You were the PRIVATE courier for what is a legitimate right to do what the U.S. P.O. should have done but didn't, and their decision to halt being improper, then you win your case!

Good luck, - - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Update:

I did call the U.S. Attorney's office again this morning at about 10:45 a.m. and spoke with Megan, the receptionist who told me that both Rob Raybach and Kim Cooper are out on vacation now, but that Bob Konsela (spelling), just walked by as the #3 man there from Tom - Joe - Bob, and he took my call then put me on speaker-phone to take notes he said (maybe somebody else listening too?) when I first said that Megan deserves more than a gold star, but a platinum star, and that he agrees very much.

After a chit chat the bottom line is that although the $75,000 machine over at Elaine's dental office as an example is not in any evidence box, as numbered and on the internet from the file, or with a sticker, it ought be be released as a homestead item/ tools of your trade, like to maybe sell to get an attorney to take the case (whether it be Habeas or Mistrial, or Appeal) but that although I'm concerned, I have no authority to act for Ed nor Elaine, or even their son David in Worcester or daughter, but it can only be them, or by whoever Elaine gives the POA: Power of Attorney to that estate woman she's had for years.  ONLY she can assert these RSA Ch. 511:2 rights to these attached items under a seizure toward a forfeiture, there being that RSA 480:1 of up to $100,000 each, but with the tax exemption, but is that for state or federal taxes?  The statute is not clear on that, and so to maybe visit the State Archives on Fruit Street in Concord this afternoon to get the hearing minutes on when this got on the books in 19__ from House/Senate Bill #____. To post here the details tonight.

So in effect we are only like the cheerleaders in this part of the case, we can yell, but have no power to push them along to an answer.  That takes the person with legal authority to assert their legal rights.

Yours truly, - Joe

[Dave Ridley]

ok cool thanks for the updated location info.  i guess i should not send reno's package until we are sure he's back at the same spot?

[LordBaltimore]

According to Donna van Meter's Myspace, Reno wasn't moved.

Here it is Folks.

I received word from Cirino about court today, he was very pleased with his lawyer, Cirino praised the efforts put forth by his representation despite an angry disgruntled judge, whom for some reason was pretty hostile to Cirinos Public Defender. His Lawyer shredded through the testimony the Marshal gave when the Marshal did not have his facts straight, Thank you Mr. David Brownes for shinning some light on the blatant flatout lies and the BS that they are doing to Cirino. We knew Cirino would not have bond set or would be released today, even with this you did put up a fight, and moved a few people in the gallery when you spoke about the kind of person, the man Cirino is, all he has done and aspires to accomplish.

I was also told tonight though that there was talk about the FBI filing their own cases against him and the others as well on counts of terrorism. we don't know what will become of this, or how they will be tried. Now realize my dear friends that with HR 1955, now even those whom are peaceful activists, anti-war, or those for simply voicing their opinions now can be considered a terrorist act. I will be honest with you right now folks, they could come after alot more supporters whom have done less, we all could be misleadingly mislabeled terrorists, using the internet as a tool of expressing or communicate, to persuade change, reguardless if it is nonviolent, by communicating we could also be seen as a cell by their loose definitions, Hell, your church can be looked upon as such as well, for spreading/sharing your faith. While I will be sad to see many of you jump ship cause many have already gotten scared much earlier on when everyone was taken in. Sadden yes, but not downhearted, Cirino always said we determined our own level of involvement, we understand if you are afraid, but we are going to continue pressing on and forward without fear without regret. While it is my hope this will not intimidate any of the supporters, this is just to give you all a heads up, this is the time to decide your own involvement, decide your fate, and the direction of this nation.

thank you

Donna VanMeter

oh yes he is still being held at Merrimack, they decided not to change his location, that is a good thing, he doesnt have to lose his letters, pictures, canteen monies, ect.

[Dave Ridley]

Apparently Bob Wolfe is supposed to be in court for a hearing on 12/7 1:30 pm, fed courthouse 55 pleasant street concord NH

It's been a while since any of us have demonstrated in relation to the brown case; none of them should be forgotten so I'm thinking I will probably head out there and hold my Free The Ed Brown Supporters sign around then.  Stay tuned to this thread and lemme know if you hear of any changes in the date/time, or any indication that the Wolfe's would not want us demonstrating.

richardr from this forum says he located the following message on PACER:

<<11/26/2007   NOTICE OF HEARING as to Robert Wolffe: Change of Plea Hearing set for 12/7/2007 01:30 PM before Chief Judge George Z. Singal at the Rudman Courthouse, Concord, NH. (dae) (Entered: 11/26/2007)>>

[JosephSHaas]

According to Donna van Meter's Myspace, Reno wasn't moved.

Here it is Folks.

I received word from Cirino about court today, he was very pleased with his lawyer, Cirino praised the efforts put forth by his representation despite an angry disgruntled judge, whom for some reason was pretty hostile to Cirinos Public Defender. His Lawyer shredded through the testimony the Marshal gave when the Marshal did not have his facts straight, Thank you Mr. David Brownes for shinning some light on the blatant flatout lies and the BS that they are doing to Cirino. We knew Cirino would not have bond set or would be released today, even with this you did put up a fight, and moved a few people in the gallery when you spoke about the kind of person, the man Cirino is, all he has done and aspires to accomplish.

I was also told tonight though that there was talk about the FBI filing their own cases against him and the others as well on counts of terrorism. we don't know what will become of this, or how they will be tried. Now realize my dear friends that with HR 1955, now even those whom are peaceful activists, anti-war, or those for simply voicing their opinions now can be considered a terrorist act. I will be honest with you right now folks, they could come after alot more supporters whom have done less, we all could be misleadingly mislabeled terrorists, using the internet as a tool of expressing or communicate, to persuade change, reguardless if it is nonviolent, by communicating we could also be seen as a cell by their loose definitions, Hell, your church can be looked upon as such as well, for spreading/sharing your faith. While I will be sad to see many of you jump ship cause many have already gotten scared much earlier on when everyone was taken in. Sadden yes, but not downhearted, Cirino always said we determined our own level of involvement, we understand if you are afraid, but we are going to continue pressing on and forward without fear without regret. While it is my hope this will not intimidate any of the supporters, this is just to give you all a heads up, this is the time to decide your own involvement, decide your fate, and the direction of this nation.

thank you

Donna VanMeter

oh yes he is still being held at Merrimack, they decided not to change his location, that is a good thing, he doesnt have to lose his letters, pictures, canteen monies, ect.

Thanks Richard, plus Donna (for your e-mail too),  I did just call the N.H. F.B.I. office at: 15 Constitution Place, 2nd floor, Bedford, N.H. 03110, Tel. 603: 472-2224 (+ 472-2513) from http://boston.fbi.gov/nh.htm as in my Reply #____ on page #____ here, currently as #121 on page 9 in my Archives for 11/2 @ 2:31 p.m. and the man (name unknown as he never gave it, nor did I ask for it) who answered the phone: I first said I'm very disappointed in you, re: having never acknowledged even the receipt of my letter last month in October, and told him of this federal non-filing of the feds to RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. and the latest in regards to the FBI looking for "terrorists" using some new definitions of the word, me a free speech rights activist, him saying: we all are, but that he assures me that to investigate this non-filing, even though it is a federal agency, and does investigations is NOT their job and so to contact "Governor Gregg", corrected to Senator Gregg, so here goes, me to look up his website of: ____________ and see what happens, if anything, re: the criminal charge I told him I did file with the Concord P.D. against Judge McAuliffe for Unlawful Simulation of Legal Process.  - - Joe

P.S. To re-call the Concord P.D. at 225-8600 again for a Progress Report on my Case #07-40622-OF then if still with no legal opinion from the County Attorney to re-call him at 228-0529 too. ___ + ___

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a re-type of my e-mail transfer through Judd Gregg's website of http://gregg.senate.gov/ Subject: Judiciary.

"Dear Senator Gregg:

--The F.B.I. Officer in Bedford, N.H. at 472-2224 told me today to contact you, since his office is in effect, neither federal nor investigative!?

-The problem is that the feds have not filed the 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to NH RSA Ch. 123:1 documents with our Office of Secretary of State, as required by the 'shall' word that the government refuses to deal with by his Art. 41 duty.

--Attorney Larry Becraft of Alabama lists the single and double-filing stares.

--I've filed a criminal complaint #07-40622-OF against Judge McAuliffe for Unlawful Simulation of Legal Process with the Concord D.D. at 225-8600.  It;s been over 2 months of them looking for a Legal Opinion from the County Attorney.  The Watch Commander just told me that Oficer Adam Fanjoy did talk with George Stuart and the file is with them at 228-0529, out of their hands, and so to ask over there.

--Yours truly, Joe Haas" *

Re: to "ask" over there PLEASE I'll call the Washington office (and 5 branch offices) to supplement my e-mail, of to call and ask for Dan St. Hillaire, the County Attorney, because I just called his office and spoke with his receptionist who told me that he was looking for my telephone # to get back to me, that I did leave on his voice mail again for the #__ time, and telling him of to please give me a yes or no, of is "Ignorance of the law no excuse" or are judges exempt from such, as if they investigate they'll find that the court KNOWS of this by the affidavits in the file to back up what Ed said in court of WHERE are the "ceding" papers?, but the judge pretending to not know what he meant?, or maybe he did know, or should have known, and so the reason for only a Class B Misdemeanor of a fine-only possibility like they did to me in the "Wise Up or Die" case.  Then if "no" prosecution, THEN Ed & Elaine can file CIVIL charges against the judge and/or court system, or for Rep. Hodes or Shea-Porter at ________________ (to call them in a few minutes) to put in a $money bill for damages at the $2,500 per day rate as per the Veronia Silva case in the N.H. State Board of Claims in the mid 1980s.  Oct. 4 - Dec. 4 = about 60 days, so $2,500 x 60 = $150,000 and counting. The deadline for filing new legislation for the 2008 Session being what? December ___, 2007, or has that deadline gone by too?

* Dear Joseph S. Haas,  Thank you for contacting me, I will be in touch with you shortly.  Sincerely, Judd Gregg, United States Senator, New Hampshire".