• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 25

Started by JosephSHaas, November 09, 2007, 11:15 AM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

JosephSHaas

I feel like Larry Glick here from the radio station, of when he'd conduct his on telephone calls over the WBZ airwaves of to this and that city/county/federal agency getting the royal run-around, asking the age-old question of WHERE is the public servant to say or have on his office desk the sign that reads: "THE BUCK STOPS HERE"?

I did just call the Washington # at Federal Rep. Carol Shea-Porter's website of http://shea-porter.house.gov/ at 1-202-225-5456 and spoke first with Paulo who asked me if my suggested bill was an appropriations bill? I said yes, and so was transferred over to Robert, the Legislative Director (not "Assistant" as Paulo said), and he said that there are Private Money Bills, and that can be entered any time during the Session, no deadlines, but that they are usually for Relief from some Passport restrictions for some visiting dignitary of a foreign state, and that maybe I ought to call the U.S. Court of Claims* at the unknown tel. # he didn't have, but that someone from his office will get back to me at the address or telephone # provided.  Him with about 5 minutes I asked? Him saying yes, and so I gave him from the 1883 statute forward to my Criminal Complaint #07-40622-OF that if there be no criminal action, then some civil action, and by either a civil court action, or civil bill through Congress, as well as maybe a Bill of Impeachment so that this doesn't happen to anybody else! by getting in a judge there who will honor his oath of office to the Constitution!

Yours truly, - Joe

* The United States Court of Federal Claims
   http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/
   http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/welcome_mess.htm
   Clerk's Office: 717 Madison Place, NW
   Washington, DC 20005
   Phone (202) 357-6400

Notice that this is "the 'People's Court'...established by Congress in 1855" that is 28 years before N.H. granted to the Feds conditional consent from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. by our N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 but which papers for jurisdiction were NEVER filed, and so there being this "money claim...founded on...the Constitution." Yeah! plus notice that this court exempts "tort"s, that are technically: "Any wrongful act, not involving breach of contract for which a civil suit can be brought".  So in other words: the big question is: Is there a contract or not?  WithOUT the filing of the federal papers with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State, to the offer we gave them on June 14th, 1883, is there a contract, or not? But what about the oath of office?  Isn't that a contract that the judge be of honor?  Of course!  He's supposed to honor the constitution, and when there's a breach of contract, then to here goes Ed & Elaine's complaints, plus that of his supporters being the Four Freedom Keepers (Danny, Jason, Bob and Reno) who have been victimized too, deserving equal pay to that $2,500 per day too, their 100 days up by around Sept. 12th to Dec. 12th = 90 days + 10 = 100 to Dec. 22, so a very nice Christmas Present indeed awaiting them to $250,000 = a quarter of a million dollars each.  No wonder they want them to enter a plea. To call the # in a few minutes to find out their procedures like how long it takes to hear the case once it's filed, and to please send an introductory packet to each inmate, at the addresses I can give to them today. Office hours 8:45 a.m. - 5:15 p.m. M-F.

keith in RI

joe i have a few hours available this afternoon, anyone i should be calling?? maybe some "im calling in reference to joe haas' calls?"

keith in RI

i just called elkton fci at 3:00pm and asked if ed was still there saying i received a package back stating that he wasnt there (which lyndse did) and i wanted to know before i sent anymore mail. they said he was still there.

JosephSHaas

Quote from: keith in RI on November 30, 2007, 01:47 PM NHFT
joe i have a few hours available this afternoon, anyone i should be calling?? maybe some "im calling in reference to joe haas' calls?"

Thanks Keith.  I tried Elkton F.C.I. yesterday it ringing 33 times twice to nowhere but a shut off. I'm glad you got through to verify Ed as still there.

As for calling around, you might try getting the list of attorneys at the U.S. Court of Claims website in Good Standing who practice there to see who wants or must(?) an attorney be hired, or can you file your own individual complaint? I pressed #2 for new complaints but the man's voice recorder was on, so to call back, maybe you can do this? Like to find an attorney there who might take this "Breach of Contract" case http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract for not money damages right away, but for "specific performance" see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_performance as in to compel whoever that federal officer is supposed to file the RSA Ch. 123:1 papers from the Feds to our N.H. Secretary of State to do his job from the contract in Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, and so when finally done, will prove there having been NO jurisdiction before that, and so Ed & Elaine to use this as evidence in their Habeas Corpus petitions, and Danny too, for his Brief to the Supremes by Dec. 26th of to at least report of a copy of some claim pending the 60-day notice, and then him out too, plus followed by Bob, Jason and Reno, onto what? to supplement the claim(s) to then know the exact # of days to put down as the $monetary figure?

Good luck, -- Joe

keith in RI

anyone know how to get in touch with fred smart? elaine said he had a radio show on rbn from 10am on mon-fri but their website doesnt list him? i got a letter from reno today ....7 pages so im not transcribing this one im being lazy. a while back i found myself asking why im helping here, but i know im doing the right thing because everyone of the 6 freedom fighters has told me the same thing. "dont worry about me take care of the others!" reno stressing in his letter to me that he is worried about the others "emotional well being" all 6 of them saying if the others need money dont give to me give to them, selfless even behind bars! reno says that there is a quote that he keeps repeating to himself that keeps him going:

"MY CHILDREN WHEN THEY SPEAK OF THEIR FATHER, THEY WILL SAY HE WAS A MAN WHO STOOD UP FOR WHAT WAS RIGHT, A MAN WHO SAID HE MUST DO SOMETHING NOW. WHAT WILL YOUR CHILDREN SAY ABOUT YOU?"

he asked me to put that out there for people to read so there it is.

in my last letter i confessed to reno that for a while i thought he was a federal agent, a plant, i admit it i was wrong, but i still thought that. he responded with this:
"a federal mrshall!? HA! thats nothing! i have been called a marshall, an fbi agent, a homeland security agent, CIA agent, a blackwater spy, hell i was even told that someone figured out & posted that i was , now get this, a rothschild agent/spy!! ah-hell, since we are on the topic of being accused, one guy even wrote when aaron russo died he thought i was mr russo's son or maybe love child or something.."

i thought that was funny.

coffeeseven

Quote from: keith in RI on November 30, 2007, 05:35 PM NHFThe thought i was mr russo's son or maybe love child or something.."

We all know that you are. Keep trying to cover it up and it will make the front page of the Concord Monitor.  ;D

kola

yeah maybe Lil Miss "Scoop" Katz -enjammer will spin this one into a frenzy.

KOla

JosephSHaas

Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 30, 2007, 10:15 AM NHFT
Quote from: coffeeseven on October 30, 2007, 07:54 AM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on October 30, 2007, 12:44 AM NHFT
So C7, when Tommy Cryer gets back to you on Wednesday (Oct. 31st - tomorrow) that he's talked with Larry Beecraft, would you please relay the info to Tommy to see if Larry is available to be a paid expert witness on this case.  I think Ed would like to conduct the hearing himself, with maybe stand-by counsel,

Yes I will.

Thank you.

Plus Ed wrote ...

(*******) I just called Fred Smart at the 1-888-606-9379 # press 1 to reach (2 to record), that he says he's getting rid of later this week. I found this by a Google search for his name, as for the America: From Freedom to Fascism that also links up with Tom Cryer, and his Federal Tax Case (upper right corner) of http://www.petermacshow.com/content/view/158/34/ and some Attorney at Law advertising banner for David C. Graham at 913: 829-5445.  This is for Peter H. McCandles, e-mail peter at petermacshow dot com for http://www.petermacshow.com too as the main page. Fred [at cell phone 847-878-8090 or office # 312: 602-2568] said that he'd like a weekly update on his Radio Show from me, me referring him over to Bernie as the one that does this, to where Bernie can say to Fred, like: "Patch me through to McGarrett"  8) reference: Jack Lord on "Hawaii Five-O", to me if he'd like, as I did on the two radio shows after my "Wise Up or Die" case, still going on.

Fred gave me Thurston Bell's phone # 865-223-5725 who did just draft up his 23-page Habeas Corpus Petition for Ed. I called there to leave a message, of what I've been instructed to do, that can be set-aside, or Ed's original sent in to start this, as like a 2-part Petition with the 23-page one as Part 2 to follow when Thurston sends that for Ed to sign and mail in directly to the court maybe early next week.

Fred also gave me not Tim Watkins, but Tim Wingate's the http://www.thepowerhour.com through 1-877-817-9829 M-Thu. 8-5 CST + Fri. 8-4, me sending him an e-mail to thepowerhour at thepowerhour dot com right now, his wife: Joyce Riley, and who will make sure that their associate David von Kliest will get it too, his cell phone #573-378-0143 confirmed by Misty who I did speak with just now....


Keith,  Here's Fred's #. I did just call both his office and cell phone numbers this morning, with only the voice recordings, to where I left a message to call me back about the latest progress report in this case.

I then called Thurston Bell at his # and got to talk with him again, who said that he sent his 11-page habeas corpus papers to Fred back in September, but that nothing was done with them other than to collect dust. Shame on you Fred!  :( Or did you look it over and make the single decision of it not worth anything?  Or did you not get it? Please explain.  Maybe you were waiting until today?  Thank you "very" much for the initial contact though to Thurston, for us now to sit silently by and back up the filer and keep demanding by present expectations of WHEN will there be a hearing on this until Ed's release? Thurston saying the usual operating time for release being a mere seven (7) days.

Anyway I did get the e-mail from Thurston, and printed it out, that I can send to anybody here upon request.  It's a fill-in-the-black type dealing with some Sixth Circuit case-law he said (as the summary of this) that when the judge tells the jury to NOT judge the law as in jury nullification, he has gone overboard and his decision upon the victim must be set aside or overturned by another judge in a habeas proceeding that does not have to be done by Ed, the victim, but any "RELATOR" and not necessarily as by David for maybe his mother too, the e-mail address for him bouncing sometimes I've found out, and just did again in Thurston's attempt to send it to him.

I told Thurston that Bernie is the one with all the papers in the case, and he's heard Bernie's name before, and so that's what I did just do: I called Bernie and spoke with him that an e-mail forward of this was going over to him, and that if somehow my free hotmail account doesn't send it by forward, as sometimes it doesn't, to let Thurston know to send one direct.

To meet with Bernie on Monday to maybe file this with the U.S. District Court in Concord is what Thurston said (rather than the Youngstown one in Ohio for the Elkton F.C.I.) because the friends and relatives have rights too he said.

I've yet to read this 11-page APPLICATION FOR THE MOST EXTRAORDINARY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241(c)(1) and (3)" and so to comment on it later.  We've got everything to gain, and nothing to lose but the $5.00 filing fee, under Rule 503 I think it was from memory of this being the box to check on the Civil Cover Sheet.

Yours truly, - - Joe

JosephSHaas

This was just e-mailed to me today from Paul Andrew Michael:

A.) #2 of 3.) http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad.shumaker.htm  and

B.) #3 of 3.) http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad.cressler.htm

about the Clerk + Deputy missing some Oath papers.

Thank you Paul at e-mail: supremelawfirm at gmail dot com for anybody to write to for the complete e-mail.

In the meantime does anybody here know if Ed ever got Clerk Starr's oath from Concord, N.H.?

Reference: the unlawful simulation of official notice criminal charge I filed with the Concord P.D. against McAuliffe, that ought to be amended to include Starr, and what? given over to the U.S. Attorney in Washington who is supposed to be investigating Tom Colantuono's corrupt Assistant Bill Morse for violating not only this, but Federal Rule 16 for NOT giving over the exculpatory evidence in the certificate of non-filing copy to either the Judge or the defendant(s), +/or by State Rule 3.8 to both!!

Yours truly, -- Joe

P.S. Dan St.Hillaire of the Merrimack County Attorney's Office says that he will NOT proceed to prosecute the judge, but what about the Clerk? To update him later too. In other words the judge just gives an "opinion" to his clerk who is supposed to be another level of the check-and-balance against unlawful writs, him the administrative brain + arm of the court like the Marshals are for only the arm without a brain.  To see The "Tin Man" tonight on the Sci-Fi channel ought to plug these guys into these roles and find out who to deal with and how.

armlaw

[quote author=

ours truly, -- Joe

P.S. Dan St.Hillaire of the Merrimack County Attorney's Office says that he will NOT proceed to prosecute the judge, but what about the Clerk? To update him later too. In other words the judge just gives an "opinion" to his clerk who is supposed to be another level of the check-and-balance against unlawful writs, him the administrative brain + arm of the court like the Marshals are for only the arm without a brain.  To see The "Tin Man" tonight on the Sci-Fi channel ought to plug these guys into these roles and find out who to deal with and how.
[/quote]




Joe...It has been understood that the County Attorney doesn't make the call. He is under OATH to convene a Grand Jury and have the evidence that supports the complaint put before the Grand Jury and the Grand Jury makes the call !

JosephSHaas

Quote from: JosephSHaas on November 19, 2007, 09:48 AM NHFT
An OPEN LETTER;

To: The United States of America
U.S. Department of Justice
Attn: H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel
Office of Professional Responsibility
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 3266
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel. (202) _____________
e-mail: _____________
http://www.usdoj.gov/opr/process.htm

Dear Counselor Jarrett:

--According to your "How to File a Complaint" you're "limited to reviewing allegations of misconduct against Department of Justice employees" and so my complaint is as a witness and participant in the I.R.S. v. Ed Brown case #06-cr-71-01/02-SM up here at the U.S. District Court, Concord, New Hampshire.

--My complaint is that exculpatory evidence* was given to the prosecutor, Attorney William Morse DURING the trial, but that he refused to give information about it to either the judge "or" any of the defendants (including Elaine Brown too), as required by Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure #16(c) on page 192, but with the "and" word for both the judge "and" defendant(s) here in New Hampshire by our State Rule 3.8.  One of the problems being that Wm. Morse is NOT a Member in Good Standing with the N.H. Bar Association, so would you please also "contact" his "state bar disciplinary organization" in the State of: ____________ to please have them notified too, as by a copy of this letter, to please get back to me, as I'd like to file an official complaint there with them too. Reference: http://www.usdoj.gov/opr/

--* The exculpatory evidence was a copy of my gold-sealed certificate of Thu., Jan. 11th, 2007 that I did get from the N.H. Office of Secretary of State with the summary of the federal non-filing to N.H.'s R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 as from Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution.  See your own Attorney General Manual #664 on this at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm and especially for the James v. Dravo Contracting Co., 302 U.S. 134 @ 142-43 (1937) in that it "embraces courthouses"!

--The federal government had courthouses in Exeter and Portsmouth, N.H. before moving to Littleton and Concord, formerly at 55, now 53 Pleasant Street in the Warran B. Rudman Building at Concord, and before that at where the Legislative Office Building is now behind and to the west of the Capitol/ State House at 109 North Main Street.  Both Concord locations also housed the U.S. Post Office at both locations but is now seperated and down the road at Loudon Road.

--The point being that Attorney Morse knew and still does know of this, but that his office, under the direction of U.S. Attorney Thomas P. Colantuono, appointed by President George Bush, continues to "litigate"** against the "Four Freedom Keepers" in the Brown case but withOUT "authority"**.  Reference "exception" clause in your The Report of "Waste, Fraud, Abuse, or Misconduct(*)" and "Report of Violations of Civil Rights or Civil Liberties" over at http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/FOIA/hotline.htm and http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/FOIA/hotline2.htm respectfully.

--So now would you please review this allegation of misconduct(*) that is really ONE STEP BEYOND, the -mis part to an actual mal-administration, in my opinion, to determine "whether further investigation is warranted." http://www.usdoj.gov/opr/proc-hdl.htm As in to "open an investigation" and notify "the attorney whom the allegation has been made and request" a written response from him.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059.

pc:

(1) Thomas P. Colantuono, U.S. Attorney
55 Pleasant Street, 3rd floor
Concord, N.H. 03301
603: 225-1552
USANHWebmaster at usdoj dot gov ....


Update: I did just call the D.C. Office at 1-202-514-3365 from the http://www.usdoj.gov/dojofficials.htm#eousa website and the woman there told me: (1) that she cannot verify receipt of my letter of Nov. 20, since it takes six weeks to process, and; (2) that his name: William Morse, is NOT in their system, and so they cannot act as the middleman for WHERE to send my complaint to the Bar Association in the state for where he is a member for proceedings on my complaint for misconduct to Rule 16(c).

Thus Local Rule 83.2a. here in New Hampshire http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/ru/local-rules/83.2.asp does NOT apply since he is NOT "a member of the bar of any United States District Court", otherwise his name would appear on this master list of "Attorneys for the United States" in Washington, D.C.

So this leaves one of two possibilities according to http://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/ac/bar-admissions.asp for either: (1) Local Rule 83.1 but that after my call this morning to Sherry there at the N.H. Supreme Court, 271-2646, they don't have him listed either; and so this leaves (2) only Local Rule 83.2(b) for four criteria to be satisfied: of 1. "be a member in good standing of the bar of any court of the United States or the highest court of any state" the answer being the U.S. court of: ________ or Supreme Court in the state of: ___________, 2. WHO filed the required Pro Hac Vice "motion"? ___________ (Tom Colantuono?), with 3. "affidavit"; and 4. the "$100 fee".

For me to re-call the U.S. District Court @ 1:30 p.m. when: Janice will be back from her lunch break, 225-1423, who told me this morning that she would talk with Deputy Clerk Dan Lynch about this, but, who at about 12:20 p.m. was is a meeting.  Yeah: probably in a meeting with the Clerk Js.R. Starr to see how they can delay my obtaining this motion and affidavit, indicating him from the state of: _______ to WHERE to file this complaint and have him put in bad standing, thus eliminating requirement #1 of 4 to have the N.H. judge "may at any time revoke such permission for good cause without a hearing", and so evidence of mal-administration for Ed to use in his case for a mis-trial, to whom the Four Freedom Keepers backed up Ed's right to revolt against this corruption, and were right!

JSH

P.S. Thank you Paul Andrew Michael, Private Attorney General for your http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/oaths/federal.judges.htm that includes the clerks too as of "profit" to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States" [see 1-8-17 for the "Consent" clause, but there being none by N.H. RSA 123:1], with the filing of such in either "the House of Congress" or "court to which the office pertains", plus the exact words for the "Oath of office of clerks and deputies" in Title 28, Part III, Ch. 57, Sec. 951 over at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sec_28_00000951----000-.html to "faithfully enter* and record ALL orders, decrees, judgments and proceedings of such court" (emphasis ADDed, even if unlawful or illegal!? No! because of the 5 USC 3331 oath to the Constitution.) * The word enter defined as to place formally on record, as in rigorous adherence to established rules, being: (1) the governing power, (2) an authoritative direction for conduct or procedure, + (3) a standard method or procedure; the standard, I presume, being as indicated over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_clerk in that "No judgment of a U.S. court is effective until it is signed by the clerk and entered on the clerk's records." **

** So what exactly did the Marshal use to capture Ed & Elaine with?  A court order with two signed copies? by the clerk.  WHY didn't the clerk sign the original? or did he? Maybe he knows that the court is withOUT jurisdiction, and so his non-signing on the original order is his way of saying that if the defendants are too stupid to put this into an habeas corpus proceeding in the federal court to where they are sent, then they deserve to rot in prison!?

*** Plus what are these "all other duties" of the Court Clerk?  WHERE are they listed? for his job description.

PPS My phone call at 1:40 p.m. to the N.H. Court resulted in more non-information: Ann answered the phone, and tried Janice, who's line is busy, and so over to Dan to where I left a message of to please send me a copy of this motion and affidavit, to my Post Office address, that I'll share with you all hopefully later this week.


Dave Ridley

i forgot to mention this earlier but i did a ridley report on some of this stuff a couple days back:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=_xhDLiKMRDE

KBCraig

If you have mail for Ed, hold onto it for a couple of days. He's en route to his new destination. Currently at the transfer center in OKC, but that's temporary.

Kat Kanning

Thx, was going to mail the paper to him tomorrow.

kola

Tell Bob I do the same, put my stamps upside down. I also write Ron Paul for Pres 2008 next to it. Kudos to Bob for telling Margot to screw off. She is just a crumb in the corruption pie that is being served.

Kola