• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 27

Started by Kat Kanning, February 26, 2008, 06:24 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

JosephSHaas

Quote from: keith in RI on April 06, 2008, 11:36 AM NHFT



LIARS!

I just called the Plainfield Town Office @ 603-469-3201 and spoke with Steve Haleran, the Town Administrator, http://www.plainfieldnh.org/ and he said that for $1.00 [and a S.A.S.E.] I can buy a copy of the property card showing that it is still owned by Ed & Elaine Brown's "TQS Trust".

I did then mentioned that Keith in R.I. took some photographs of the NO TRESPASSING signs when he was last up here for the trial of the Ed Brown supporters earlier this month, and that the signs lacked the required "address" as required by N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 635:4 over at http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/635/635-4.htm

When I asked if it was in c.u.= current use, he said that some recreational credit of 20% was applied for but denied, and that owners with c.u. can still post their property with NO TRESPASSING signs.

The standard in N.H. is that you can go hiking and hunting on private land, so long as it's not posted every "100 yards" and "on all sides": north, south, east and west.

Has anybody checked around the entire property?  I think I'll walk right up the driveway anyway as NOT in compliance with our New Hampshire statutes.  Who do these Feds think that they are who can ignore the way we do business in this state!?  Their first placement of paperwork has to be over at the N.H. Office of Secretary of State and THEN with that RSA 123:1 compliance they can then assert the U.S. Code within our borders.  Do these "U.S. PROPERTY" signs somehow by-pass RSA Ch. 635:4 ? If so how?

In the meantime to get law-enforcement to back me up: State Police, Sullivan County Sheriff and local Police when we could do some act of civil disobedience, eh? David. Against these civil and criminal codes over-riding our statutes! as against the law too, from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution!

"Woe worth the day" - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, 603: 848-6059

pc: Town of Plainfield, plainfield.ta at plainfieldnh dot org P. O. Box 380, (110 Main Street) Meriden, N.H. 03770, Tel. 603-469-3201 with a $1.00 bill + self-addressed stamped envelope; please send me a photocopy of this card. _______


coffeeseven

Quote from: JosephSHaas on April 14, 2008, 06:01 AM NHFT
"WHO IS ED BROWN?"

From ElfNinosMom on April 6th, 2008 at 4:04 pm over at http://www.redcrayons.net/?p=22#comments #4:

"Ed is nothing but a redneck version of Charles Manson".

Quatloos and the spinoff RedCrayons have been very unkind. I would hope "someone" there is on the government's payroll. If they're doing it for fun that's a pretty sad commentary on what our brothers and sisters have become.

JosephSHaas

Quote from: coffeeseven on April 14, 2008, 09:13 AM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on April 14, 2008, 06:01 AM NHFT
"WHO IS ED BROWN?"

From ElfNinosMom on April 6th, 2008 at 4:04 pm over at http://www.redcrayons.net/?p=22#comments #4:

"Ed is nothing but a redneck version of Charles Manson".

Quatloos and the spinoff RedCrayons have been very unkind. I would hope "someone" there is on the government's payroll. If they're doing it for fun that's a pretty sad commentary on what our brothers and sisters have become.

Coffee:

You're right. 

A. Since when has Ed stolen VW beetles and converted them into dune buggies and gone out to kill his neighbors? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Manson Re: The Tate-LaBianca murders of the:

(1) killings at the former Terry Melcher property (son of Doris Day), where Folger heiress Abigail Folger ran out of the house, but was knifed to death by Patricia Krenwinkel and witnessed by cottage house keeper William Garretson. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Krenwinkel having turned her life around, with her next parole board hearing on _____ __, 2008 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Garretson , plus the unfortunate visitor victim: Steven Parent http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Parent who was there to sell a radio to the caretaker, but was shot by Charles "Tex" Watson as he was driving down the driveway on his way out of the property.  He "tested at near genius level for electronics" and might have been the pre-inventor, for what is now the Kansius Machine, as seen on last night's CBS-TV "60 Minutes" of the injection of gold nano particles into the body that attach onto the cancer cells, then can be cooked to death, leaving no side effects.  One of the best segments I have ever seen: 8:10-:20 p.m. due to the Masters Golf Tournament going into overtime.

and: (2) the unfortunate grocery store couple: Leno + Rosemarie LaBianca.

B.) The redneck reference, being to a "cracker" over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redneck_%28stereotype%29 over to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_cracker for the phrase of "a lawless set of rascals" plus under the North America paragraph on the redneck page, over to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swamp_Yankee for "the northern equivalent of the southern term redneck."

So HOW ElfNinosMom can equate Ed to being such is beyond belief!  since the Swamp Yankees of Thompson, Connecticut during the American Revolution took refuge in the swamps to get AWAY from the British.  Ed was daring them to "Show Ed the Law".  He was not a fugitive on the run, but standing his ground, after asking in court: where are your RSA 123:1 ceding papers?  Getting nothing but blank stares from the judge and/or magistrate. It's time to "wake 'em up"!

JSH

JosephSHaas

Here's a re-type of my e-mail of today [Mon., April 14th '08] @ 10:32 AM
Re: "Dopey U.S. Gov't goons."
To: plainfield.ta at plainfieldnh dot org, sheriff at nhvt dot net, and isb at safety dot state dot nh dot us

"To:
1.) The Town of Plainfield C.O.P. (via The Town Administrator)

2.) Sullivan County Sheriff Mike Prozzo
http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/sheriff/index.htm

3.) The N.H. State Police: NAB a DOPE  :) 1-800-NAB-DOPE

Attn: Troop C, 15 Ash Brook Court, Keene, N.H. 03431, 603: 358-3333

Dear Law Enforcement Officers:

--Would you please inform me of your 'Rent-a-COP' program.  I'd like to hire you, or contribute $___ each for you to be a witness to the assertion of my civil rights to walk up to my friend Ed Brown's house to take a picture of it from the northern end of the driveway.

--Unfortunately it's posted by the U.S. GOVERNMENT as THEIR property, with NO TRESPASSING signs, but that they/ the signs are illegal per RSA Ch. 635:4 and they/ the federal government goons are illegal too as per no RSA Ch. 123:1 filing with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State. In effect: dopey alright, as in definition #3 of the word in the Slang of: A very stupid person.  Stupid, as in 'Slow to apprehend', and apprehend as: 'to grasp mentally; understand'.  So the Feds too slow to understand as in: to accept as an agreed fact: 'It is understood that the fee is five dollars' ['The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language', (c)1973 @ page 752].  Or in other words: It is agreed that the filing is under 'the oath of some officer of the United States having knowledge of the facts.'

--So would you three Law Enforcement agencies please agree with me in writing back that I have a right to go up that driveway since it is currently illegally posted, and that you will Article 12, N.H. Constitution protect my rights?

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H., Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone).

P.S. See my Reply #7254 on page 484 of 9:14 AM today over at http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.7245 "

JSH


JosephSHaas

Quote from: keith in RI on April 13, 2008, 09:32 PM NHFT
i tried to post this on jj's redcrayons site but its not being allowed through ....

Keith:

I gave up posting over there when I was blocked by the Administrator J.J. since her agenda is to keep out undesirables.

-- Joe

JosephSHaas

401 Center of Town Road is owned by The TQS Trust, NOT the federal government!

See the last paragraph below for the link to that website plus http://www.thememoryhole.org/doj/doj_forfeiture_forms.pdf for page 1 = page 4 of 79 @ 72% for the Jimerson case: "So if property really belongs in whole or in part to a third party, criminal forfeiture will not work. United States v. Jimerson, 5 F 3d 1453 [11th Cir. 1993]" Proof is in the Town of Plainfield property card.

So in this case, since The TQS Trust owns the Plainfield property, then there can be no forfeiture!  >:D

I did just call the U.S. Marshal Monier @ 225-1632 a few minutes ago, and spoke with him, me saying that instead of those U.S. PROPERTY signs of NO TRESPASSING being a bald face LIE, that he ought to maybe change them to a WARNING sign of maybe more hidden explosives that they might not have found?, since they do NOT own the property!

His answer to me was what he thought to be that magic word of: seized. Him saying something like "we've seized the property".   ::) Oh yeah? really? Take a good look at the dictionary definition of the word: 1. To grasp suddenly and forcibly.  So yes, they did grab by force, but not force of law, but as militators using force as evidence, since they have not seized legally, since that is "To take into legal custody; confiscate."  And they THINK what they did was "legal"?  Bullshit! 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution over to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 requires that they file the papers before they have jurisdictional authority to impose the U.S. Code upon us here within the jurisdictional territory marked by the boarders of our state with Massachusetts, Vermont, Canada, Maine, and the Atlantic Ocean. Get with it Monier: wise up. Stop playing word games.  I pin you down that you have no legal authority, and can prove it by evidence of the certificate of non-filing.  Your say-so just doesn't cut the mustard! 

Remove those illegal signs now!  They are a disgrace to your oath of office that you have violated.  The sooner you do what's right, is to mitigate the damages already done, since an attachment is a taking, and the penalty for theft being the sevenfold amount of, in this case over $1 million x 7 = $7 million, that ought to come out of your own paychecks, elegit style for the rest of your life!

JSH

Quote from: JosephSHaas on December 27, 2007, 03:24 PM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on February 12, 2007, 01:06 AM NHFT
Quote from: DadaOrwell on February 11, 2007, 04:07 PM NHFT....


Thanks David,

I went over there and found in the "Court and Legal Information" chapter, with sub-chapter: "Does Anyone Know How..." at page #1 of 2 so far, JiminNY's Reply #2 of 2/7/07 the link to ALL the documents in the file up to and including last Thursday's 2/8/07(*) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE at http://edbrown.org/wordpress/?page_id=28 that is fantastic!

The document reads that $27,997.13 is traceable to the 401 Center of Town Road, Plainfield, N.H. 103+ acres of real estate and asks in #6 at page 3 of 5 that: "Upon the issuance of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec.853(n)(1) (incorporated at 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5317(c)(1)(B)), the Department of the Treasury WILL publish at least once for three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation notice of this Order, notice of the Treasury Department's intent to disopose of the property listed in the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture". [emphasis ADDed.]

The unsigned and undated PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE at page 2 of 5 in #4 has it that "This Court's jurisdiction in this matter IS grounded" (**) and at page 4 of 5 in F: "The United States and the Secretary of the Treasury SHALL publish notice of this Order". [emphasis ADDed for the present, and mandatory must requirement for the future tense.]

So when all is combined: the court's "ground"ing is false, as there is no RSA Ch. 123:1 documentation on file as required by Article I, Section 8, clause 17 of 18 that the Secretary of the Treasury too takes an oath to support the constitution of the United States, and to faithfully discharge the duties of his office, that by their http://www.ustreas.gov/ website involves "the formulation and execution of treasury policies" but NOT those as dictated by an OUT OF ORDER court!

What Ed should do are two things in my suggestion: (1) have his State Rep. approach the House State-Federal Relations Committee to where I had no luck in getting an Article 32 Petition signed for House Rule #4 processing to them to urge the federal gov't to comply with the law and statute, but if still no back-up from the committee, then to write the letter directly himself to Henry M. Paulson, Jr. putting him on notice to the illegal actions by the U.S. District Court, and that any actions taken by him in reliance upon such wrongs will result in him being personally responsible for as by him being fired for breach of his oath, and a lien slapped on his house in the exact amount of: $27,997.13 to offset his continuing this court corruption to the next level, and/or (2) for Ed to sell shares of $1,500 each up to this $amount, as by Article 20, Part 1st & Bill of Rights, N.H. Const. to guarantee the investor a state jury trial against any federal attempt to by-pass RSA Ch. 123:1.  The shares being in contract for a mote and/or wall, in the legal sense around his property, to like be the Dirty Dozen and a half of 18 investors, to reap a share of the stolen equity if and when the I.R.S. finally attaches the property, or even worse, goes through via the U.S. Treasury to try to seize and forfeit it, such as to try to dupe some third party manceptor into paying for a quitclaim deed taking the paper in his hand to try to enforce something that is not enforceable by the very definition of the words in the 16th Amendment withOUT any enforcement power nor enforcement clause, the dupe in effect having paid the taxes for Ed if such a manceptor is that stupid! 

To call The Secretary of the Treasury, Henry M. Paulson, Jr. (who makes $183,500/yr.) at Tel. (202) 622-2000 for "General Information" as to maybe WHO* he might have delegated this authority to to accept or reject such an ORDER from a crooked and illegal court. The Main Treasury, 1500 Pensylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20220 * Deputy Secretary Rbt. M. Kimmitt?

Yours truly, - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone)

footnote #1. A tax in its essential characteristics is not a debt, "Black's Law Dictionary" 5th Edition, (c)1979 @ p. 1307 reference Counts 2-6 about some "income tax due and owing" that is a crock of shit! from these George Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty Four" double-talkers, and Counts 7-14 about the FICA "taxes...due and owing" too.

footnote #2. To also try to talk with U.S. Treasurer, Anna Escobelo Cabral about my F.O.I.A. of Tuesday, December 19th, 2006 to The United States Mint / Headquarters, 801 9th Street, Washington, D.C. 20220 (202) __________, that remains unanswered, and to re-type to here later.

footnote #3.  My Thu. 2/8/07(*) complaint to the PCC against Morse by the Respondent Superior action against his boss Tom Colantuono, the U.S. Attorney for a violation of Rule 3.8 in state and Rule 16 at the Feds, for not presenting the exculpatory evidence of no documents as required by RSA 123:1 proving a mis-carriage of justice against both Ed & Elaine Brown that ought to more than pay for any taxes that might ultimately be "due", with $plenty left over as for punitive damages, with book and movie rights, hopefully not selling any wood in plastic paperweights after any cannonballs or tear gas cartridges ripping though the plywood, like Reagan did sell his Innauguration platform timber scraps for about $20.00 each back in Jan. 20+ 1980. (;-)

Update: Thanks Keith for writing that Elaine is in receipt of four certified envelopes from the I.R.S. in regards to this latest forfeiture proceeding no doubt, in Case #07-MC-00046-JM for Js. R. Muirhead, being prosecuted by: AUSA Geo. W. Vien of: 1 Courthouse Way, Ste. 9000, Boston, MA 02210, 617: 748-3100, to where I just called and asked Amy Jones, the paralegal and witness coordinator for Michael J. Sullivan, the U.S. Attorney for his oath of office.  My message was voice recorded for her to pick up later and please comply because I do not want to see the same old bullshit that went on up here with the Tom Colantuono- Wm. Morse fiasco repeated down there.  In other words to acknowledge no "ground"ing (**) as proven by the John Hannigan, Archivist letter to me of June 1st '07 for the Secretary of State, Wm. Francis Glavin, that there has been no filing down there either to Title 1, Chapter 1, Section 1 of The General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Tercentenary Edition, 1932 from Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution, see: http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm and http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm

From what I've learned here the Secretary of the Treasury gets some E.O./ Executive Order to act from the President himself, but that unless he published his T.O./ Treasury Order in the CFR/ Code of Federal Regulations, it does NOT apply to us as members of the public-at-large! To likewise get a copy of his oath of office should he delegate some order down to the U.S. Attorney for prosecution. As you can read, I warned him: Henry M. Paulson, Jr. (who makes $183,500/tr.) not to be an outlaw back in February, by contacting Eric Hample, the Director of The Office of Asset Forfeiture, 1341 G. St., Suite 9000, Washington. D.C. 20220 at 622-9600 with Kathy referring me over to Bill Bradley, his legal counsel at direct dial 622-2252, both to get a copy of this reply IF Vein doesn't stop this lie! (**) of there being a grounding, when there has not! See my Reply #2076 on page 139 of 2/12/2007, Mon. @ 10:41:13 AM just below here on page #52 of 58 so far in my Archives.

My actual February folder in this case with the notes from the Jury Instructions to see Doc. 127 in this Case 1:06-cr-00071-SM page 14 of when McAuliffe told the jury that it's an "obligation" to file an income tax return, defined as "The constraining power of a law, promise, contract, or sense of duty".  So Judge McAuliffe: which detailed definition is it? When Ed says: Show me the law!  You say: "sense of duty"!? since there is NO promise NOR contract, and even NO law, and you know it! or should know it by the I.R.S. case #M/83-50-D against me in this very same courthouse with Chief Judge Shane Devine proving that when I did not "volunteer" to file a 1040 form, the IRS did one for me, and that was ruled unconstitutional: their section 5 for rents from me: the landlord was and still is unlawful! and to say that all the U.S. Code have been proven lawful in the courts was either a mis or mal- practice by you who ought to declare a mistrial! See footnote #1 above for that New Jersey case, in to correct that statement by you that "taxes that are due"!  to which you told the jury, and I now tell you of: shame on you: to declare a mistrial, and now! immediately!! And you keep Ed & Elaine in a "Correctional" facility!?  How disgusting!

For more information about this Forfeiture crap, see my postings of 2/22/2007 over at (1) http://questforfairtrialinconcordnh.blogspot.com/ (2) http://www.fear.org/whatsnew.shtml and (3) http://bleap.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html plus (4) the "elegit" replies too at pages #__ and __, etc. [ note: the bleap dot blogspot has been erased, but from the original over at: http://www.thememoryhole.org/doj/forfeiture_docs.htm thanks to russ at mindpollen dot com getting a copy of this with thanks: Russ Kick, P.O. Box 30453, Tucson, AZ 85751-0453].

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

P.S. Notice paragraph #5 of my 2/12 reply of calling for "a mote and/or wall, in the legal sense around the property" to be asserted by "the Dirty Dozen and a half of 18 investors".  Although this was not done by selling shares, the volunteers came, and now four of them are sitting in jail.  The sit being temporary, and when they get out and about this February 2008 for some skiing, as it taking almost a year from this original call-to-arms, they will be counting their rewards. And as the actor Leonard Stone said as Sam Beauregarde, "Square Deal Sam" said in the original movie: "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory": "With Sam B. it's a GUARANTEE".  ;)

kola

Joe, who is the sheriff of the county where the browns peoperty lies?

kola

JosephSHaas

Quote from: kola on April 14, 2008, 12:14 PM NHFT
Joe, who is the sheriff of the county where the browns peoperty lies?

kola

kola: His name is Mike Prozzo, at the link above.  I sent him that e-mail, but that it bounced.  I then called his office and spoke with his receptionist and she said that he's not in until Wednesday, and that she's been having internet problems too.

Mike is a good guy to talk with, as opposed to Monier who keeps on talking over my talk, as he prefers not to hear the truth. Mike listens but still can't get it through his thick scull, is what Monier said to me this afternoon on that "legal" issue, me saying to him: that you're wrong!  You have no jurisdictional authority.

Here in N.H. we have the Police Standards & Training center that is supposed to teach the cadets the law and statutes BEFORE they go into the field, but ever since Lincoln Soldati, the Strafford County Attorney from Dover took over with top-of-his head course non-materials he told me years ago, the money they get from that 20% penalty assessment from all the criminal fines, is a big waste of money!

Jack McLamb, of the "Aid & Abet" newsletter tried to educate Mike this past Summer '07, but Mike did the 'ol Monier shuffle of avoiding continuing education in this department.  In my opinion he's a disgrace to the county and state, since he is the Deputy to the PS&T in Concord and so needs to be voted out of office in this Fall's elections. In other words him left with only: just over 6 months (1/2 year) left, but of such non-quality that somebody in his county like Ed ought to take him to the Superior Court in Newport and have him evicted for his non Art. 12 protection.  He violated his RSA 92:2 oath of office. Maybe the candidate-to-be can contact Ed to get rid of this violator. 

- - Joe H.

P.S. The dental office in Lebanon is located in Grafton County.  The Sheriff there is Wayne Dutile, who married Barbara Dunn, the daughter of Superior Court Vincent Dunn: who took the appeal of one of my early motor vehicle cases against licensing or some such protest, me citing Art. III, Section 2, Clause 3 U.S. Constitution for a criminal trial by jury, and he said to get lost: case dismissed.  8) -- so as not to set a precedent. Plus Barbara having worked for Charlie Barrie, a most corrupt Sheriff who violated RSA Ch. 528:18 by not serving my corporate clerk.


kola


JosephSHaas


kola


JosephSHaas

Quote from: kola on April 14, 2008, 05:23 PM NHFT
Monier is a liar and has commited tresaon. Thats a fact....

Kola

Technically he's a "sociopath" thinking the end justifies the means.  He needs medical help. Seriously!

kola

he needs to be taken out of service  ;) and replaced with someone who honors the constitution.

Kola

JosephSHaas

Quote from: kola on April 14, 2008, 11:03 PM NHFT
he needs to be taken out of service  ;) and replaced with someone who honors the constitution.

Kola

"Is there a doctor in the house?"  :icon_pirat:

check out this video over at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1MLJMx8528

of: Calvin McNeil for Mike Gravel, with mention of the liars at about 3:16 - 5:38 of the 7:30 total, in Manchester, N.H. outside the Merrimack Restaurant this past Winter. 

JosephSHaas

Quote from: kola on April 14, 2008, 11:03 PM NHFT
he needs to be taken* out of service  ;) and replaced with someone who honors the constitution.

Kola

* Yes, as in some action by his appointers to revoke his powers as being mis or mal-used in that he's only to execute "lawful" precepts.

The "seizure" of the corporate property is WRONG! and when Prozzo returns tomorrow, to call him to get some back-up to this civil dis-obedience that is an abuse of the U.S. Code, like operating without a license, this being an operation withOUT "Consent"** or permission, of my/our walking past the NO TRESPASSING signs of the Feds that are out of order, as against RSA Ch. 635:4 and it being a seizure alright, but what type?  As I've written above: it's by force of arms, not force of law (1-8-17 U.S. Constitutuon**), and so illegal since there be no filing with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State by RSA Ch. 123:1 either.

Monier told me yesterday by screaming into the phone that if I cross the line that I WILL be spending time with my friends in prison.  Bullshit!  Monier will be proven to be a fraud right then and there, and the impeachment process started against both him and the judge! An impeachment paper to Hodes*** to write from right on the driveway and in front of the house.  8) and witnessed by the signing of three New Hampshire Law Enforcement entities giving me safe passage by Article 12 protection in writing BEFORE I set one foot on the driveway heading north, to wit: The New Hampshire State Police, The Sullivan County Sheriff, and the local Chief of Police! Plus to invited the governor to this event for his Art. 41 back-up too, with the Executive Councilor for that land being Ray Burton, http://www.nh.gov/council/district1/ and why not?  both State Reps and Sen. Peter Hoe Burling. Plus Sen. Judd Gregg and Paul Hodes to personally deliver it to him right there too.

Yours truly, Joe Haas

P.S. Like Harry Truman used to say: They hear the truth and think it's hell.   >:D