Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 27

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a re-type:

"To: Federal Representative to The Congress of the United States of America

Paul W. Hodes, 18 North Main Street, Suite 400, Concord, N.H. 03301, Merrimack County, 603: _________

RE: Request for Legislative Audit of your
--------------- Legislative Court
sitting at Concord, New Hampshire

Dear Jane:

--This is to follow-up my visit to your office earlier this week, and now present you with a copy of the e-mail of March 28th that started this being some voucher authorization, as approved by some Judge ________ Howard for to pay Attorney David H. Bownes of Laconia for his work in the Cirino Gonzalez part of case #2007-cr-0189 of the U.S. v. Riley et als.

--The amount for that time frame of from: _________ to _________ was $4,894.05 with $1,012.00 withheld for some reason(s), and that includes his trips over to and from the U.S. District Court in Portland, Maine, which expense payments are ILLEGAL, per the requirement by the 'shall' word as a must / mandatory condition that ALL proceedings, which means 100% (one hundred percent) MUST occur withIN the jurisdictional territory of New Hampshire!

--Thus these amounts need to be corrected by their replacement into whatever account from which they were dispursed from, and to get this going my suggestion is for an audit to verify by certification that the books are NOT in compliance with the law!  And THEN to deal with it!  So to PREVENT more outlays and reverse this trend.

Thank you, - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, 603: 848-6059

Friday, April 18th, 2008 @ 4:50 o'clock p.m."

JSH

[JosephSHaas]

Keith:  Here's the info about the Elegit process, from #644 at page 43 in my Archives here. Notice paragraph #2 about the Morsell case of that "The lien arose from the power* to issue a writ of elegit" 91 US 357 (1875).  So the question is like in the power* of a motor, of HOW to put it to good use?  Answer: By turning the key to the car to get it started, and then put in gear to travel.

So HOW to start this process? By a choice. By who? The Plaintiff (see paragraph #3 below). So who gives the choice?  The Defendant.  Did Elaine ever offer 50% of the net proceeds after expenses from her dental practice to the federal or state government(s)? Let's back up a moment: Did the Feds or State ever file a civil action for to elevate the tax to the status of a debt? Answer: no.  Then WHY not?  Because that would allow her to make this offer of choice, and would expose the federal seizures to forfeitures of others as out-of-order thefts too, opening up a can of worms, or Pandora's Box that you'd think the attorneys would love, because that would give them multiple clients for years and decades of litigation.

So to put this "monkey wrench" in like a sabot or shoe into the federal machinery, as a saboteur: one who commits sabotage, but in this case of NOT the dictionary definition #2 of: "Any underhanded effort to defeat or do harm to an endeavor; deliberate subversion" BUT for definition #1 of: "The damaging of property or PROCEDURE so as to obstruct productivity or NORMAL functioning." (emphasis ADDed for the current or normal way or procedure of doing these seizures by the I.R.S. as out-of-order!** and so really abnormal.) See my Reply #____ above, of a seizure by force, and not a legal seizure since there be no N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 filing from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution.

** Thus it's not the apple tree (or land and building) that the Feds will be trying to sell to a third-party manceptor in a tax sale, a sale under all faults, for better of WORSE, by quitclaim deed to the real estate, but really only those so-called rights that the government has, that are really privileges: the privilege to take up to 50% of the apples or proceeds until the debt be paid off, and without a tax-to-debt having been made, then the buyer buys nothing but the right to step into the government shoes. And to an empty building!? From nothing produced therein, they get nothing. 

So we've got to get the Fish & Game to remove these illegal signs (RSA Ch. 635:4), to check out the what? padlocks ON the building, and report back to the corporate owners to order the Marshals to remove their padlocks too.  So WHEN I see and photograph this up close and personal, I can then be an in-your-face type of guy to Gene barking in my face the other day, to say to him and his bosses, Ronald Reagan style like he was to the Soviet Leader of the USSR regarding the Berlin Wall: to "Mr. Gorbechev: tear down this wall!" to say: "Marshal Monier: remove these locks!"

Yours truly, - Joe

...

4. The last question in the press conference tried to touch on whether or not the federal government has the authority to seize a primary residence for tax compensation. Does this mean the IRS will not seize the property?

The IRS will be able to seize the house. Elaine's total tax bill was more than $2,000,000.
....
 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

P-L-E-A-S-E!  Let's not do like the Feds did to mix up the process. The house has been "seized" (past tense), now moving toward a "forfeiture".  And under a TAX!?  Here I go again:

"You have got to be shitting me!?"

Read "Black's Law Dictionary", and from memory for the Fifth (5th) Edition, (c)1979,  page 1307 for the word: tax; A tax, in its essential characteristics, is NOT a debt.  One owes debts, but not taxes.  Taxes are like the polliwog (or tadpole) turning into an adult frog.  And re: -pole, see also: the old word for tax collector, as "catchpoll".  They've got to catch you first. Not this: you have to "volunteer" bullshit! That's "Three Stooges" mentality of like just because everybody else steps backwards (both figuratively and physically), that you have automatically stepped forward, when you didn't even move!?

Here's a little bit from the State Archives, on Fruit Street in Concord, N.H. about this Elegit stuff: From House Bill #1356 of 1996, presented by Roland E. Hemon, R.I.P. from Dover who was the ONLY State Rep in decades with guts to file a Bill of Impeachment BEFORE the David Brock, Supreme Court Chief Impeachment.

"1. WHEREAS: 'equity has always existed as a part of the common law in New Hampshire' Eckstein v. Downing, Vol. 64 N.H. REPORTS 248-260 (Merrimack County, Dec.ember 1886) @ page 259; and;

2. WHEREAS: according to the Morsell case, 91 US 357 (1875), 23 LAW ED. @ p. 437" 'Judgments by the common law were not liens upon real estate.  The lien arose from the power to issue a writ of elegit.' +

3. WHEREAS: the process of Elegit* (Henry Campbell BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 5th edition (c)1979 @ p. 467) is: 'He has chosen' as in the Plaintiff has chosen to be called a 'tenant by elegit' to hold a moiety or half (fifty percent, 50%, 1/2) of the freehold land, till out of the rents thereof the debt be levied or until the defendant's interest be expired, and;"

No wonder the Feds set the term of imprisonment for less than seven years.  They want them to get out in 5.5 years and go homeless! when the truth is in Public Law 97-280, 96 Statute 1211 of The Year of the Bible for 1983 & Beyond, in that by Deuteronomy 15:1 "At the end of every seventh year thou shalt make a release" (see also Nehemiah 10:31).  So year 5.5 to 7 = 1.5 year of being homeless!?  No way!  The lien of: $___________ against the Browns can only attack the fruits as in if and when the Dental Office is auctioned off to WHOever, they merely take a quitclaim deed, not a Warranty Deed.  And to what percentage of the property?  Answer: as a temporary landlord of the whole, but only allowing, after their what? 10% management fee, for expenses, to give 50% of the net profits therefrom to the Feds until the "debt" be paid, and this tax not yet declared a debt, as the Feds have skipped over this process! Shame on you Feds!

A Notice of Lien is NOT a lien, and against the I.R.S. here by our beefed-up statute, thanks to Andrew Tempelman and his "Common Law Court" tactics that they were aiming at, but the Fed goons getting the ricochet alright!  The filing of any lien without a court order for debt, is RSA Ch. _______ Tampering with Public Records, and State Rep. Lars Christiansen of Hudson meeting former State Trooper-turned retired State Rep. now too, Dick Marple of Hooksett, to "go after" these Registrars of Deeds in all ten (10) counties, in putting them into that culpable mental state so as NOT to avoid any criminality on any then-after such I.R.S. Notice of Liens filed AS liens, but more importantly for the civil, to do away with these bogus IRS liens, and even start maybe some class-action suit against the Feds because read the definition of an Attachment: an attachment is a TAKING!  What did the Feds take, or steal? The equity or borrowing power of that $dollar amount they did wrongfully attach! x 7 for punitive damages per Proverbs 6:30-31 and Public Law 97-280 again. 

Yours truly, JSH

* re: #3 above: This Elegit process "found by researching the McInnes v. McKay case 127 Maine 110, 141 A 699-703 (1928) in Snladach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View et al, p. 348-9, from the Miller Newspapers, Inc. v. Keene case, 546 F.Supp. 831-837 (D N.H. 1982) @ p. 836, footnote #4, cited as recently as in page 2 of the 5-page Temporary ORDER of James D. O'Neill,III, Presiding Justice dated May 4, 1994 in Shedd v. Haas, Grafton County Superior Court Docket #94-E-035/ Document #8 of 29 items so far recorded."

P.S. See also RSA Ch. 480:1 for The Homestead Right of $100,000 per person, and so Ed & Elaine both to at least: $200,000. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XLIX/480/480-1.htm that used to be: $30,000, then $50,000, and now $100,000.

note: my Reply is between the - - - - - -, sorry, but I'm not that computer savy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[JosephSHaas]

My visit with Jason then Danny today:

Grand Jury: and this, and that;

Judge (Capt.) Singal: oh what the heck, just change the "and" words to "or" in the indictments, and if the trial jury questions it, tell them it's been amended by judge over-rule.

Washington, D.C. big shot:  Nice going Singal, you get the $_____ bonus. Even though they'll win on appeal, this will teach them not to contest any government actions in the future, as when we change the rules as the game's in motion, there's nobody to stop us. The wimps in Congress who can impeach us, are just that: wimps.

JSH

P.S. Jason told me that one of his attorneys told him that that outburst by Reno of to the jury of: you have the right of jury nullification, has resulted in another charge (of up to 3 years) interference with the jury; added onto the other two charges to be re-tried.

Danny's working on the corporate U.C.C. stuff, so Dick: if you're reading this, he's been contacted by what I call "Patriots for Profit", and you might like to visit him with your expertise on this, and/or with Gary Bedard and that Redemption stuff having already purchased some or all of it.  ($500 kit?) In other words Danny saying that that's why they refuse to go Constitutional, even though they take the oath, the oath is just a smokescreen to the corporate.  I told him that that was what Martin J. "Red" Beckman told me years ago, to ask the I.R.S. for their bond numbers, that I did in 1983 in Laconia at the Forestry Building, so maybe that was like THE question that hits their funny bone?  To contact the State Insurance Commission on Monday to see if the Feds are licensed to do business up here as some waiver to the RSA 123:1 filing requirement that has been replaced by such?  It sounds like monkey business by government goons, but then that's what we have: goons in power who need their chains yanked for them to get back behind the bars in their cage, the bars Martin said of the constitution.

IMO this corporate excuse is bullshit!  RSA Ch. 92:2 is still on the books and that until the constitution is replaced by some insurance policy* to pay the victims after any and all wrongs, it's still the law! Now get that through your thick skull Monier: obey the law you bastard!

footnote: remember what that replier from Maine said about there being some Ben Franklin trust set up centuries ago now, that pays for victims of federal gov't abuse.  Maybe hidden when you say the magic words in the U.S. Court of Claims?

[Kat Kanning]

P.S. Jason told me that one of his attorneys told him that that outburst by Reno of to the jury of: you have the right of jury nullification, has resulted in another charge (of up to 3 years) interference with the jury; added onto the other two charges to be re-tried.

Wow. 

[JosephSHaas]

P.S.

-- The printer from the law library computer has been removed.  The reason given is that some inmates were using it to print personal pictures.  So WHY punish those inmates, like Danny, who used it to write to the court?  The court wants hand-written motions?  I doubt it!  Have you ever read Elaine's hand-written motions here?  Wouldn't you have liked to read it in type-written form? Bill Riley even donated three ink cartridges when they used that as an excuse that it was costing too much. Danny thinks that the U.S. Attorneys have somehow convinced the establishment of to remove it so that they don't have to deal with his writings... [To call the County Commissioners tomorrow to look into these lame excuses. I've even donated some 500-pack copy paper from STAPLES @ $4.00/package. acid free Item #135855, 8.5"x11" #92 bright. That put into storage, or being used by the office secretaries?]

-- ...Like to follow up on his criminal case against them, that's been assigned to a R.I. judge, and his civil case against them (the Removal case that was pulled up there, in violation of the U.S. Code too of it supposed to have been pushed up there by the Defendant) to be assigned to a Maine judge.  For both Jason and Danny, me telling them that maybe they ought to put in a motion to put their criminal case in abeyance to delay sentencing until these other criminal and civil cases are dealt with so as to put those adverse consequences as evidence into their PRIVATE pre-sentence report to offset any PUBLIC/ Government Pre-sentence Report. Them telling me that their attorneys are looking into this, because by standard operating procedure, criminal cases are always given the fast-track to those in the civil department, so WHY is that Rhode Island judge sitting on it?

-- The Defendant County BTW still thinking about my request that they void the Fed-County contract as void ab initio, since there can be no direct Washington, D.C. to County connection without having to go through the N.H. Secretary of State according to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution. This indirect contact for a contract needed to be valid in our state of New Hampshire: a double-filing state, currently in non-compliance. For Jason +/or Danny to file a civil action #2008-C-____ there in Dover at the Strafford County Superior Court? There's been no "prompt", by Art. 14, answer to my request of last month for them to Art. 8 account to this situation. Maybe needing a little judicial push upon this executive branch to do what's legislatively called for by the "shall" word as a mandatory requirement in order to put into effect any and all of the U.S. Code.  My federal tax dollars being mis-spent, and illegal, by these sucking parasites of both money and people.  This crap has got to stop! Danny saying that that $2 million check (in a frame in the Commissioners' back office on the wall) is not for past but for building a future federal addition to the jail? Then maybe they'll also be in compliance with the federal rule of supplying food at only 25% over cost, to the inmate Commissary?  Jason telling me that they're working up a first draft lawsuit since they're paying four times (4X) the price for those Ramon Noodle soups.  So who's getting the $ kick-back here!?

JSH

footnote: the timing of today's posting too from watching Dr. Robert Schuller I, on the Lifetime Channel 33 here at to 8:24 o'clock a.m. this morning for the http://www.crystalcathedral.org 's "Hour of Power" from Garden Grove, CAlif.ornia with guest speaker: Monique Strydon, with her first book of: "Shooting the Moon" from Africa http://www.newafricabooks.co.za/books_detail.asp?ID=47 with mention of the gov't shooting at her group captured by rebels, describing the bullets wizzing past her too, as Danny described, plus of cutting through the foliage. Her second book on Miracles, to be published this Fall '08. ____

[JosephSHaas]

P.S. ...
guest speaker: Monique Strydom, with her first book of: "Shooting the Moon" from Africa http://www.newafricabooks.co.za/books_detail.asp?ID=47 with mention of the gov't shooting at her group captured by rebels, describing the bullets wizzing past her too, as Danny described, plus of cutting through the foliage....

http://www.truth.co.za/moniquestrydom_v2.pdf

[JosephSHaas]

The Pope: "Those whose rights are trampled, he said, 'became easy prey to the call to violence and they then became * violators of peace..'" [Foster's Daily Democrat, Dover, N.H. http://www.fosters.com Saturday, April 19th, 2008 @ page A5 by the AP: Associated Press.

* But what type of violator**? against the peace and dignity of the state? Art. 88, Part 2, N.H. Constitution  http://www.state.nh.us / or the feds? certainly not the state, as we have a duty and right to revolt against such federal tramplers: those who trample on our N.H. RSA 123:1 statute, but our state, county and local government officials say in effect: we don't give a shit!? To which my reply is: horse-shit!

** A violation of some U.S. Code? When that code has yet to be certified here in New Hampshire by RSA 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution!

Monier: we are the executive puppet-masters providing the judge with decorum: conformity to social conventions; propriety.(**)" Or in other words: to hell with the lawful and the legal. We do not have a pre-scribed rule of not allowing hats on withIN the courtroom, and so the convention, or accepted(*) practice, of our "take to"(*) oneself, be to ourselves that we take what is said by the one with the hat on in a "Point of Order" and muzzle him by showing him the point alright: that point of land outside the boundary of OUR property! and shove him that way! We NEVER allow the GENERAL usage or custom to be interrupted by any SPECIFIC point of order in the line, even when our line be wavy like a snake! The decorum of the social OVER the legal at all costs! Furthered by class over the "individual interrelations".  Class as in the upper class or crust, that must not be annoyed by such outbursts! even when the host state we do enter illegally as parasites have it in their Article 38 that "A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the constitution, and a constant adherence to justice...and all the social virtues, are indispensably necessary" we say "or" rather than "and" and so do knock off the principles of the constitution: to hell with Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 U.S. Constitution that requires us to get "Consent" from the state of N.H. by RSA Ch. 123:1, our justice can be an in-justice for our non-filing; and these peasant class people up here must say to us when we say jump, of: how high?    To hell with preserving "the blessings of liberty and good government".  They want excellent government by the 123:1 filing, but get what we determine as not very fine, or very good, nor fair nor poor, but in the mediocre there in the lukewarm/ fence-sitting position of only "good" government as WE define such to be! With the "or" word replacing the "and" word, we, in effect get rid of these blessings to pre-serve, and so take, TAKE!! away! their rights and convert same into privileges.  Thus they have NO right to require THEIR magistrates to a "constant observation" of the constitutional principles, because we are not THEIR magistrates but DOWN upon them from on high. So as Marshal to "execut"e the law, I say to hell with the procedural due process, as the end justifies the means! They call me a Sociopath, but my doctor declares otherwise.  See his certificate of good health he gave me yesterday hanging on my wall.  But don't tell anybody about the physical and mental test I FAILed just after I took the oath in 2002.  before I found this witch-doctor!

JSH

(**) propriety, as in "Conformity to prevailing customs and usages." Monier: At no time shall we allow the law to over-ride the custom.  The public are in the gallery, and so before the veil or black cloak of our puppet.  We are the masters that must keep him from being profaned. The members of the public are, in effect, before or outside the temple to where our goddess of parasites sits and they must hold up their arms to wave when our metal detector man says they shall! All hail the goddess!

[JosephSHaas]

...All hail the goddess!

Monier's like this Nazi in Star Trek's "Pattern of Force" (1968).

1. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708442/

2. 1-minute clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AEdwUnLunE&NR=1

    of: "Hail victory!"

For the complete 50-minutes, 20 seconds show, see:

3. http://www.cbs.com/classics/star_trek/video/video.php?cid=649539296&pid=eEUoq7fwtYvOzjNnUFpnG_KyKwhYClzO&play=true&cc=1

JSH

[JosephSHaas]

So Keith:  Is Elaine going to renew her license? Here's something from the Archives to think about? WHY did they take the criminal route? to get the taxes, when the pre-scribed manner of doing business is by the civil route!  Again: if the taxes were against the income, and not the individual, then WHERE was her Article 12 protection from this Board, and WHY do they want more $_______ for what? More non-protection!?  You have got to be shitting me! I smell a lawsuit against that Dental Board. -- Joe

So where doth the oversight for judges resideth?

And yes Joe, you are Spock. 

BTW - Thanks for posting about Cryer's radio show Joe. This morning the KCAA live feed is Christmas Polka music. I might make it a permanent part of every Saturday morning. 

Here's the link to Cryer's last shows on KCAA:

http://yardtv.gotdns.com/kcaa-podcasts/cryer/

Thanks Coffee,

--I finally got around to listening to the last broadcast of Fri. 12/21 @ 7 p.m. Pacific Time, and with guest speaker: Bob Lawrence...of Peoria, Illinois ...

--Now here's something Elaine can use: Bob says that by Title 44 U.S. Code Section 3502 (see also Sec. 3512), that of the policy of when a licensee, like she was with the N.H. license to practice dentistry, doesn't pay her taxes, the action is to revoke or suspend her privilege.  So WHY didn't "they" comply with the Code? And Tom says that that Section 1 they always cite is for a tax imposed "on" taxable income (the thing), and NOT the individual (or person).  To which I add: of either: the res, or the rem to some degree.  And so the "imposition" upon Ed & Elaine in the second degree AFTER the first imposition?  This is like an Inquisition! ....

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the Pen gun (.22 cal.)- Edmonton video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggA0NWg_iR4&NR=1

found by way of:

1.) Suspect Dies After Deputies Use Taser Gun
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYwX4P5gGyI&NR=1

2.) Woman Blocks Taser Shot with Baby
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejeSfQLS3LQ&NR=1

So what's next, COPs kill pen-totting suspects?

Playgrounds OFF LIMITS?  See
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdtqhgkSzS8&feature=related for the WSPA - S.C. Trooper caught hitting people with their cars.

Modification: "Police Taser Spokesperson" 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOJ9_CApGfg&feature=related

[JosephSHaas]

"Soldier turns into Chewbacca when hit with a Taser"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPENzKOmOl0&feature=related

[DonnaVanMeter]

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/commission.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/confirm.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/oath.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

Not sure  if anyone here has taken a look at this, Thanks to my friend Rob for digging this one up.

[JosephSHaas]

Thanks Donna.

Notice that the month and day of birth are blacked out on his oath.

So the next time "they" ask for your name and D.O.B. at the metal detector gate, maybe just to tell them your: name, rank and serial number of:

______________, state citizen, 19____.

- - Joe

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/affidavit.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/commission.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/confirm.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/singal.george/oath.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

Not sure  if anyone here has taken a look at this, Thanks to my friend Rob for digging this one up.

[JosephSHaas]

The "arm of the court" is "rotten to the core"!

To whom it may concern:

- - - - - - - - - - -  NOTICE OF DISHONOR - - - - - - - - - - -

Joyce: "All rise for the honorable court!"

Haas: "You have got to be shitting me!"

Affidavit:

Who*: This is to verify that, I Joseph S. Haas*, a New Hampshire state citizen,

What: did present United States Treasury Check No. 8149-00046056 [ 15-51/000] dated April 15, 2008 I.) FROM: The "U.S. Department of Justice, United States Marshals Service, District of New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant ST., Suite 307, Concord, NH 03301-3937, as signed by Stephen R. Monier, UNITED STATES MARSHAL in black ink, from account #81499 : 000000518: 00046056 II.) TO the Bank Teller* at The Ocean NATIONAL Bank, 66 N. Main St.**, Concord, N.H. 03301, 603: 225-0056 for payment*** in accordance with The Coinage Act of 1792, for the dollars as described therein, by handing**** it to him/her in exchange for these dollars, at exactly __:__ o'clock a.m. this morning***** but was met by a default: noun: "A failure to perform a task or fulfill an obligation"; verb: "To fail to do what is required" [The "American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973 @ page 188.] there being none of these prescribed dollars available today(*) per my "order", as in the words: "Pay to the order of ...

• " who had endorsed same over to me by writing and signing in blue ink: "PAY TO THE ORDER OF: JOSEPH S. HAAS" and then his signature on the back of the check.
  
  When: *****
  Where: **
  Why: ***
  How: ****
  
  WHEREFORE: I file this "Formal written complaint with the" Office of Comptroller of the Currency, about this "national bank" by signing below, and mailing to both: (1) Customer Assistance Group, 1301 McKenney Street, Suite 3450, Houston, TX 77010; cc: (2) The Comptroller of the Currency, Administrator of National Banks, Washington, DC 20219, and claim that you correct this default ASAP: as soon as possible, since a default is also defined as: "Loss by failure to appear" and "To lose by not appearing" for the noun and verb respectfully on that same page 188. Thus either the appearance of this lawful money be paid to me within twenty (20) business days of today, as under the F.O.I.A. Freedom of Information Act, them getting a copy too, to: (3) Comptroller of the Currency, Disclosure Officer, Mail Stop 3-2, Washington, DC 20219 with my question of: WHERE'S THE MONEY? http://www.occ.treas.gov/mail1.htm
  
  cc: To my local Congressmen: A.) Sen. Judd Gregg, 125 North Main St., Concord, N.H. 03301, 603: 225-7115, http://gregg.senate.gov/public/ and; B.) Rep. Paul Hodes, 18 North Main Street, Suite 400, Concord, N.H. 03301, 603: 223-9814 http://hodes.house.gov/singlepage.aspx?NewsID=1501 ; to straighten out their Legislative Court to be in compliance with the law, because if not, then the court with their judge therein is a hypocrite for saying that: do as we "say" by the U.S. Code, not as I "do"! Thus an audit please with certification as being in compliance with the law! and;
  
  C.) All of the four (4) defendants in this case #07-cr-189-GZS who can file a Motion to Dismiss, for failure to appear this lawful money since by Section 20 of THE COINAGE ACT OF 1792: "That the money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars...and that all accounts in the public offices and all proceedings in the courts of the United States shall be kept and had in conformity to this regulation." http://landru.i-link-2.net/monques/coinageact.html
  
  Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, 603: 848-6059 e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com So Help me God.
  
  NOTARIZATION by: __________________________ in Concord, Merrimack County, state of New Hampshire this (Earth) Day, Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008 @ __:__ o'clock a.m. that the above named Joseph S. Haas, did personally appear before me to sign and acknowledge verbally, that yes: all of the above is true and correct, to the best of his knowledge and belief.
  
  (L.S.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - Notary Public
  
  My Commission expires: _______________________
  
  (*) to return after the 20th business day, and so just after Tuesday, May 20th '08 @ __:__ o'clock a.m.
  
  
• Modification of name and address.

[les nessman]

   This may be somewhat out of context with the thread but in light of the anniversary of the
Branch Davidian massacre (AMONG OTHER THINGS!) I felt the need to make a five minute
motivational memorial dedicated to those killed, imprisoned, or harrassed by the system.
Ed and Elaine will be included, a link will follow in coming days posted to the account "bxfrontlines"
over at www.youtube.com.  Arrgh!