• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 28

Started by JosephSHaas, May 03, 2008, 08:59 AM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

JosephSHaas

Quote from: keith in RI on July 09, 2008, 06:57 PM NHFT
Jason is in 120 b or botom, here is his visitation schedule for july and august. i havent gone to visit him yet myself he just sent this to me this week but if anyone else is interested in going there is no registration required he said just a background check etc once you get there. he has circled the dates in pencil that are his visitation days.


Warning: The visiting times are up to 2 hours in length, but you canNOT just get there at ANY time, within that visiting time, like they allow in Straffford County for Danny.

For Jason you've got to get there BEFORE the start of that time, and if you're 1 second after the time, the crowd of visitors is already being corralled down the hall to the door leading to the outside back section of the building secured for walking into the other building where the giant glass fish-tank-like enclosure is located that the visitors surround 360-degrees on all four sides, North, South, East and West. 

-- Joe

JosephSHaas

Quote from: JosephSHaas on July 02, 2008, 12:03 PM NHFT
P.S. Heidi at the Manchester office (641-9536) gave me the list of speakers for tonight's forum:

1.) Tom Blair, PSNH
2.) Patrick Quinn, Amtrak
3.) Mike Whitten, Manchester Transit
4.) Tara Payne, NH Higher Education
5.) Leon Topolosky, NH Employment Security
6.) Richard Archand, N.H. Banking Dept.
7.) Andy Cadoretti, NH Housing Finance Authority
8.) Jessica Scott, US Dept. of Housing & Urban Development
9.) Daphne Feeney, US Dept. of Agriculture
10) Sarah Varela, Consumer Credit Counseling
11) Katrina Loughlin, NH Healthy Kids
12) Nancy Sevigney, N.H. Service Links

JSH


Minutes of Meeting, of: Carol-Shea Porter's Dozen Presenters:

Five people showed up, count them: five.

Verified by one attendee, Ray Dube of 71 Tory Rd., in Manchester, N.H. 0310___ Tel. 603: _________ in his "Letter to the Editor" on page A17 of today's http://www.unionleader.com newspaper for: Thursday, July 10th, 2008.

Yeah, congratulations Carol: that's one more attendee than what you could have been spending time of getting the answer to me for the "Freedom Four" of what I've been calling and visiting your offices now for months: to get that certificate of non-receipt to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. down at the Federal Archives in Trapello Road in Waltham, MAss., and have Mrs. Tarlton of the G.S.A./ General Services Administration (with the blueprints)  in Boston file those papers as REQUIRED by the "shall" word with Bill Gardner's N.H. Office of Secretary of State! in Concord, N.H.

In fact you ought to do both.  To see how your Alton meeting goes next week...

Joe Haas

JosephSHaas

"John DiStaso's Grantite Status: Hodes scores big with contributions:

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=John+DiStaso%27s+Granite+State%3a+Hodes+scores+big+with+contributions&articleId=4ff5a337-c130-42a0-9618-300ccba0ff14

Here's my comment, to maybe be posted:

"Attorney Hodes proud of his 'accountability'!? You have got to be sh**ing me!  I've asked him to endorse my complaint to the subcommittee of the House Judiciary and he tells me to get lost! What an *ss!  Reference the illegal payments to attorneys in the Ed Brown co-conspirators' case to travel to Portland, Maine when by Title 18 U.S. Code Sec. 3232 all proceedings shall be in the "district" of N.H.!  Get with it Hodes, stop being a liar! Revelation 2:9".

JSH

armlaw


[/quote]

Thanks Dick, but that I dis-agree with that "recover"* word. At least for us white folks. The Fourteenth Amendment reads that "All persons born...in the United States...are citizens of the United States AND of the State wherein they reside." (emphasis ADDed from footnote #4 over at http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/expatriation.htm for The "SURVEY OF THE LAW OF EXPATRIATION" of June 12, 2002 by JOHN C. YOO, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, with 14 footnotes.

Joe... in addition to the misspelled words, I neglected to explain the reason why I used the word "recover" was because when I enlisted in the U.S. Navy, I "contracted" away my birthright as a freeborn American and became a "United States citizen" by contract! This was done by a mutual "CONTRACT", which I entered into, knowingly, willingly and intentionally. Accordingly, an act of reversing that contract after the four year term had expired and I was honorably discharged, was necessary to overcome the "doctrine of presumption". If one remains silent, the "doctrine of presumption" prevails and it will be "presumed" that I wish to remain a United States citizen. I did not, and therefore took the necessary action to "recover" that which I had "contracted" away, using 15 Statutes at Large, chapter 249 to do so. As for dual citizenship, no thank you!  Please read Article 4, Section 4 where the constitution provides protection for the States. Why expose yourself to the burdens imposed on United States citizens by claiming "dual citizenship" ? Keep the tiger in its cage.




JosephSHaas


JosephSHaas

In today's http://www.unionleader.com

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUNDAY NEWS @ page #____

"John Stossel: Yes, you do have a right to self-defense"

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=John+Stossel%3a+Yes%2c+you+do+have+a+right+to+self-defense&articleId=b52463dd-41e0-492f-8c58-422067c2cee2

JSH

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

OPEN LETTER to: John Stossel [if my Comment of last night is not printed]

Here's the re-type:

"Thank you John. I like your statement in paragraph #9 of 18 at half-time warning us of the 'homegrown tyrants'.  See what John Eidsmoe wrote about this on page 2 of 8 at his http://www.eagleforum.org/court-watch/alerts/2003/oct03/Eidsmoe-10-08-03.shtml that: 'The rule of law restrains both the people and their rulers.  Where law does not restrain the people, the result is anarchy.  Where law does not restrain the rulers, there is tyranny.  Those who believe in the rule of law must be equally opposed to both.' - - - - I hope to see you back in N.H. soon, like to investigate the latest law-breaking by the Feds.  'They' are shipping inmates over to Portland, Maine OUTside the 'district' withIN the 1st 'circuit' in violation of 18 USC 3232, that can ONLY happen IF the defendant makes a motion, or in a civil case to there or Rhode Island.  My Federal Rep Hodes and Sen. Gregg say: tough sh**.  Can you believe this?! re: the Ed Brown anti IRS co-conspirators case of USA v. Dan Riley et al.  The end justifies the means!?  To hell with procedural due process!?  Oath takers allowed to break the law!? Sociopaths! They're the REAL outlaws!"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

What needs to be done:

Dare any of us "take the bull by the horns" like these "Freedom Four" did? When we see tyranny in action by the Feds are we there with our guns to STOP these illegal transports? Danny, Jason, Bob and Reno were there at the Ed & Elaine Brown property in Plainfield to HALT the Feds operating in this state of New Hampshire, from exercising an illegal and unlawful warrant.  Was Danny's attorney Sven Wiberg allowed to enter into evidence for a Exhibit #__ to the jury, the Article 49 Petition for the governor, or other(s) to assert his/her/their Art. 41 power to enforce all legislative mandates by the "shall" word in N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to prove that they had and still have an Art. 10 right "and" duty to revolt against these "outlaws"?

From personal experience I've won that RSA Ch. 627:8 right to use force to retake my property back from the un-law enforcement! when they go berserk. See State v. Haas in the Grafton County Superior Court, case #89-S-___ jury trial that I won, thanks to an excellent Public Defender: Thomas Rappa of Woodsville.  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/627/627-8.htm

To prevent the illegal and unlawful taking of a victim such as Dan Riley, the inmate, from being kidnapped and taken OUTside the "district" calls for more than just a property statute, but THE U.S. Const. and the 2nd Amendment, BUT like I write: does anybody here reading this dare to assert such such a right? on PUBLIC soil, knowing what happened when the "Freedom" Four did so on PRIVATE soil. That's where our PUBLIC servants in BOTH the state and federal govt's are supposed to have within its framework a check-and-balance AGAINST such corruption.  But does it exist?  I've written to the Attorney General's Office, Attn: Jane Young, Chief, Criminal Bureau last Tuesday, July 8th to seek an indictment this Fri., July 18th (10 days later) in the Strafford County Superior Court, but will she? or he: the County Attorney Tom Velardi? or do I have to file a Petition for to be allowed to present my own case for them/ the Grand Jury to maybe sign ON STEP BEYOND the foreman, to a "Presentment" signed by at least #___ of them? to be valid. Or at least an RSA Ch. 600:3 Investigation to look into this. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIX/600/600-3.htm to "diligently inquire".

SAMPLE (first Draft) PETITION TO THE GRAND JURY:
Via the Superior Court Clerk's Office, with Judge's endorsement.

Would the Grand Jury please inquire into the crime of kidnapping by the Sheriff's Office in their June 26th illegal and unlawful transport of inmate Dan Riley of Dover to over to a pre-sentence hearing in Portland, Maine, to either indict or present that officers ____________ + ___________ can make a defense of Respondeat Superior to have the High Sheriff answer, and PREVENT it from happening again on or before next Friday, July 25th as the next appointed time @ 9:30 a.m. in Portland, Maine.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) E-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com.

keith in RI

for those who dont think ed is being punished more severe then others, here is some info about USP MARION. i found it here:
http://www.walkinginplace.org/prisons/prison_marion.htm
MARION is a "super-max" prison..........

apparently MARION Penitentiary is considered todays ALCATRAZ!!
   does a tax protestor deserve that?
eds recorded calls to the world and his allowing another inmate to call his dieing father on his phone account has gotten ed branded as a trouble inmate....... which resulted in him being shipped to MARION. ed has said a long time ago that he didnt think he would make it through a prison sentence and it looks like they will make it as tough as possible for him. i have even received letters from eds fellow inmates from previous prisons he was in telling me how much they look up to ed and admire him! and tell me how he gets treated more harshly then other inmates, and they ask if i can keep them informed on his circumstances.... ed doesnt deserve the kind of treatment they are giving him. they now completely restrict his mail, elaine and only a select other few receive mail from ed and even that is sporadic at best. sometimes coming with multiple letters in one envelope. he has no access to any phones for at least a year so effectively he is cut off from the outside world completely. that is inhumane. all over taxes. pray for ed because he will need it in that place!

   

***********************************************************
USP Marion, located in rural southern Illinois, opened in 1963, the same year the federal prison at Alcatraz closed. Alcatraz had gained a reputation as the "end of the line," the federal system's most repressive prison. Prominent gangsters, such as Al Capone, and Robert Stroud, the famous "Bird-Man," were imprisoned there, as were celebrated political prisoners like Rafael Cancel Miranda, the Puerto Rican National Hero, and Morton Sobell, co-defendant with Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. However, the brutality of conditions at Alcatraz proved too controversial in an era when prisons were supposedly committed to the rehabilitation of prisoners.

Marion was constructed to hold 500 "adult male felons who are difficult to control," according to Congressional testimony in 1971 by George Pickett, then superintendent of Marion. Nonetheless, Alcatraz's prisoners were not transferred directly to Marion. Presumably, the BOP considered that the move might spark off significant protest and they wanted to test out the new facility before sending the most politicized prisoners there. Not until the late 1960's were some of Alcatraz's former prisoners transferred to Marion. At about the same time, Marion began its transformation into the new end of the line, a true heir to Alcatraz in its barbaric treatment of prisoners.

In two separate incidents on October 22, 1983, two guards were killed by prisoners in the Control Unit. Although no rebellion resulted and the prisoners responsible were identified, prison officials seized the opportunity to violently repress all prisoners and implement their 1981 plans. The "lockdown," or cell-confinement of all prisoners, was imposed on October 27, 1983. The next day, the warden declared a state of emergency. Sixty guards, including specially trained Special Operations Response Team (SORT) members, were transferred to Marion from other institutions to assist in the lockdown. In addition, eight BOP executive staff members and three senior wardens were sent to "monitor" the procedure. A guard at the time, David Hale, recalls how a Marion official, evidently uninhibited by the team of outside monitors, set the tone for the ensuing shakedown:

"I seen them carry one inmate down the corridor with a guard on each leg and one on each arm. The assistant warden comes down the hall and grabs the inmate's testicles and starts yanking on them, saying, 'Who's doing it to who now, boy?' Well that was a signal for every guard in the place to do whatever the hell he wanted. I can't describe it to you - I never seen beatings like that. At least fifty guys got it, maybe more."

"Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Marion Now Uses RRB System's Rapid-Cuff Design For Inmate Custody and Control"

Established as the Federal Bureau of Prisons Long Term Control Unit, USP Marion is one of two "Super Maximum Security" Prisons in the United States. Filled with problem prisoners, violent felons and custody incorrigables, USP Marion has long been known as the 'end-of-the-line' for Prisoners who are unable to function within the confines of traditional prison environments.
**********************************************************

also all of the PSI's were done recently. danny has been recommended 30 years, jason 11. im not sure about reno. jason says they have been told the govt will ask for 30 though for him. he said it is kind of F'd up considering they never hurt anyone. he said rapists and child molesters and murderers get less time then they will probably get.

keith in RI

and elaine writes to us that every time ed is transferred  somewhere in the prison they do it with one of those silence of the lambs face shields on him.

JosephSHaas

Quote from: keith in RI on July 14, 2008, 05:05 PM NHFT
and elaine writes to us that every time ed is transferred  somewhere in the prison they do it with one of those silence of the lambs face shields on him.

http://www.kropserkel.com/lecter.htm

JosephSHaas

#249
Update:

1.) My call to the Strafford County Sheriff's Office, Attn: Capt. DiGregorio was complete in my talking with him a few minutes ago of just WHO that Deputy was that simple-assaulted the inmate Dan Riley on Thu., June 26th with the purpose of to transport over to Maine across state lines in violation of 18USC3232 since the Defendant never signed any such motion to do so as allowed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 21(b) @ page 43 of the book, but that his reply of this is NOT an RSA 91-A request from withOUT, but must be made withIN a "Motion for Discovery" in the court case, and so with only ten (10) days from today, to Fri., July 25th as the next planned assault, I did then:

2.) Call the A.G.'s Office, Attn: Lucy Carillo, who is taking this case, where I left a voice message for her that my talk with the Captain was to get to the solution here in the fastest and most non-aggressive process, and that might be for this Class B fine-only complaint against the officer to be filed in Dover District Court by: (1) her office, as the check-and-balance within the system, or (2) by my power and authority to start and complete a private prosecution.

cc: Dan Riley, to file such a Motion for Discovery in the past tense IF the A.G. canNOT extract this information faster, or else rely on there being ANOTHER incident after-the-fact of the Sheriff's Office KNOWing of this in writing, and being TOLD of this by the inmate next Friday morning, to try to at least get the Badge Number of the Officer, so that the criminal process against that individual Deputy to plead Respondeat Superior in Dover District Court can be started BEFORE the Fri., August 1st sentencing in Concord, N.H. as a factor or element in the case to maybe put on hold until AFTER the trial and conviction in the state to prove that the end does NOT justify the means, and so for a Motion for a New Trial, since these hearings in Maine were pre-trial too, and so a tilt in the machine like in a game of pin balls ought to get the entire case dismissed, or at least a new trial.

Yours truly, -- Joe Haas

Quote from: JosephSHaas on July 08, 2008, 08:59 AM NHFT
Quote from: JosephSHaas on June 13, 2008, 11:22 AM NHFT
Update:
...
(*) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/633/633-1.htm = N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 633:1 Kidnapping, I. A person is guilty of kidnapping if he knowingly confines another under his control with a purpose to: (c) Terrorize(**) him. II. Kidnapping is a class A felony.(***)

(**) terrorism: the POLITICAL use of terror and intimidation; as in over-powering to dis-courage; dis: as in the lack of, or in-validation of courage: being confidence, by their "confidence game" of an assurance or to make sure as by insurance.  There being no such assurance by there being NO federal filing to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const...

(***) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/651/651-2.htm RSA Ch. 651-2,IV(b) = up to a $100,000 fine per corporation....


To: Jane Young, Chief
Criminal Bureau
Attorney General's Office
33 Capitol Street, Room #___
Concord, N.H. 03301
603: 271-3658, ext. 5

Dear Chief Young:
... *
[/quote]

* Modification: The entire content of this letter can be found by clicking on the July 8 @ 9:14 a.m. link above. Erased for space here.

JosephSHaas

Here's a re-type of the letter from:

"Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

CAROL SHEA-PORTER, FIRST DISTRICT, NEW HAMPSHIRE

104 WASHINGTON STREET
DOVER, NH 03820
(603) 743-4813

http://www.shea-porter.house.gov

COMMITTEE OF EDUCATION

Mr. Joseph S. Haas, Jr.
Gilmanton Iron Works, NH 03837

Dear Mr. Haas:

--Thank you for your January 23, 2008 call regarding the arrest of Ed and Elaine Brown, and your subsequent April 7, 2008, June 6, 2008 and July 3, 2008 follow up calls as well as your June 4, 2008 e-mail.  You requested that Congresswoman Shea-Porter contact the General Services Administration (GSA) and request that documentation be filed with the New Hampshire Secretary of State.

--Please understand that although prior to April 1, 1985 the National Archives office was a part of the GSA; on that day they became an independent agency operating as the National and Records Administration (NARA).  GSA offices are unable to address your concerns.  However, records in the legal custody of NARA are open to the public and individuals are encouraged to research matters of interest.  You may visit NARA at their office located at 380 Trapelo Rd., Waltham, Massachusetts, 02452-6399.

--For any records that may be located at the New Hampshire Archives you may wish to contact the Division of Archives and Records Management at 71 South Fruit Street, Concord, NH 03301.  Their telephone number is (603) 271-2236.  If their office is unable to respond to your concerns you may contact Governor John Lynch's office and request their assistance on your behalf.  Governor Lynch's telephone number is 603-271-2121 or 1-800-852-3456 (in-state toll free).

--Mr. Haas, there may be one more agency that may possibly have the information you seek; the Congressional Research Service (CRS) who does research for current Members of Congress.

--In order for us to contact them on your behalf we need a written request, listing your specific federally related concerns.  Please direct your correspondence to my attention at the Congresswoman's Dover, New Hampshire office.  Once I receive your letter, I will contact the CRS and provide you with a copy of their response.

Sincerely, Olga Clough, Director of Constituent Services

cc: Mr. Joseph S. Haas, Jr., PO Box 3842, Concord, NH 03302-3842"

JSH




JosephSHaas

Here's the re-type of my reply:

"To: The Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, Attn: Olga Clough, Director of Constituent Services, for: Federal Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, M.O.C. / Member of Congress, First District, New Hampshire, c/o 104 Washington Street, Dover, N.H. 03820, 603: 743-4813

From: Joseph Sanders Haas, Jr. (is my full name), Legal residence: Gilmanton Iron Works, New Hampshire; Please reply to my Post Office Box address below, for where I work in the King City of Concord, N.H.

RE: Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17 U.S. Const. to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 information 'and' filing.

Dear Director Clough:

--Thank you for your 2-page letter of July 11th '08.

--As indicated in paragraphs #4 + 5 of 5, would you please 'contact the CRS' [Congressional Research Service] 'who does research for current Members of Congress' and on my 'behalf' obtain and relay to me of their answer to this written request:

1.) For the copy of any receipt of federal filing.  1-8-17 requires that 'Consent' be given by the Legislature withIN the state BEFORE the Feds can operate/ have jurisdictional authority withIN their jurisdictional territory, that N.H. granted to the Feds on June 14, 1883 when the Federal Court held alternating sessions in Exeter and Portsmouth dealing in MINOR crimes, and THEN moved to Concord (first to where the L.O.B. is now, and second to the location at 55 Pleasant Street, both of which were Post Office locations) for MAJOR crimes, now looking to see if all t's have been crossed, and i's dotted because this was a conditional consent!*  The Secretary of State has already proven to me that such a filing NEVER occurred, and which evidence was attempted to be put into an Exhibit #___ in the Ed Brown anti-I.R.S. case but that was REFUSED by astronaut widower judge Stephen McAuliffe, who ought to be IMPEACHED, by such a Bill.  The proof of non-filing is a gold-sealed certificate signed by Bill Gardner on Sept. 10, 2001 after a search by Frank Mevers at the N.H. State Archives, with copy to the governor, who 'may' by his Art. 41 job description hold a proceeding but 'shall' be responsible for any and all injuries resulting therefrom that non-recording.

2.) Since the statute reads of 'some officer of the United States" to verify by oath and 'file' same, I thought it would be Mrs. Tarlton's G.S.A. with the blueprints, but if the CRS has THE answer to otherwise, then to please tell me WHO to bother to 'hound' to do their job! Your history of the GSA and NARA in paragraph #2 is interesting but worthless as to WHO to perform this task.

--Now here it is almost: six (6) months later from my Jan. 23rd '08 call, and with the Congress-woman maybe ousted this Fall by the people so disgusted with both the Democrat & Republican Political Parties, I'd like to say that for my tax money paid in by my boss at work, at least she did something right for me and my friends who have become victims to these illegal and unlawful militations, the proof being this eventual filing too.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - -  - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302; Monday, July 14th, 2008 @ 7:45 p.m."

JSH

JosephSHaas

Quote from: JosephSHaas on July 15, 2008, 09:49 AM NHFT
...and which evidence was attempted to be put into an Exhibit #___ in the Ed Brown anti-I.R.S. case but that was REFUSED by astronaut widower judge Stephen McAuliffe, ....

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!

Q. Question: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_wrote_"Oh_what_a_tangled_web_we_weave_when_first_we_practice_to_deceive" ? [yes this is the correct spelling with the quotes, but not highlighted here.]

A. Answer: Sir William Scott, (Lord) "Marmion", Canto VI, Stanza 17.

http://www.patrickkillough.com/books/sirws_marmion.html

See paragraph #__ on page 4 of 6 at the 70% print-out:

"For Marmion is a thoroughly rotten piece of work: seducer, forger, liar, greedy for lands and not squeamish about how he acquires them.  Other tales within tales are there primarily to show us how Marmion made himself Marmion. -- First, he seduced Constance de Beverley a vowed Benedictine nun, and kept her with him disguised as his page until he tired of her for land-rich, orphaned Clare de Clare. To break Clare's engagement to Sir Ralph de Wilton, Marmion had his paramour Constance forge documents which convicted Henry VIII that Wilton is a traitor."

Yeah! This is what McAuliffe is: a "Marmion". The seal of his court has NO authority behind it.  Talk about "The Wizard of Oz" syndrome.  The dis-order is NOT in Dan Riley, but withIN this corrupt court.  A legislative court. The corrupt-ors being our Congressmen who allow this lie to continue.  The lie that they SAY they have jurisdiction. YES- jurisdiction as in the ownership of land limited by their boundaries to the Concord public sidewalk, or do they even have that? MAYBE. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm

123:2 "The lands (so ceded*) shall be exempt from all taxes and assessments..."

* 123:1 but were they? so ceded. _____  no! So why no property tax bills!?

cc: the Concord, N.H. Tax Collector; again, to reconsider; or the "new" Catchpoll**?

** http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Catchpoll "A sheriff's officer, especially one who arrests debtors."  See also:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/catchpoll Middle English cacchepol = literally, chicken chaser, from cacher + pol chicken.

But certainly NOT legislative authority from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 because there is NO federal filing!

Not judge McAuliffe, but who I now call Marmion McAuliffe, in addition to being a liar, is similar to this Marmion of old as it regards greedy for lands too, as I've explained above in Reply #____ that the power to lien, attach or seize property is by the allowance that the debtor has to write out a Writ of Elegit, in that the creditor may have up to one half the net profits until the debt be paid in full. So instead of taxing the apples they/ the I.R.S. takes the tree!? forever!!!!???? When in court against Elaine for what they said she owed them "and" the state, they still had not the final bill when asked by the judge. Did the judge ever ask the so-called debtor if she offered such a writ? Why not? "A tax, in its essential characteristics, is NOT a debt" [emphasis ADDed from the N.J. case in The "Black's Law Dictionary" 5th edition, (c)1979 @ page 1307] The tax has to ripen into a debt BEFORE the offer can be made. And so they arrest on taxes!? This is out-of-order!

JSH

cc: with thanks to Patrick Killough, e-mail: patrickkillough at charter dot net


JosephSHaas

Hey Mr. Wilson!  ;D

New info:

I just called the USP Marion in Illinois @ 1-618-964-1441 http://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/mar/index.jsp and spoke with the officer in charge who tried to connect me to Mr. Wilson's voice mail for HOW to get on Ed's visiting list, since I did fill out the form to visit him when in N.J. to find out if the form carries over within the system, like money orders, or do I have to fill out a new form, and if so, to please do whatever it takes please for a visit to see Ed sometime in August. I never received written confirmation of my approval, and so would like that in writing BEFORE any venture.

The officer said that there's a train station in Carvindale, Illinois, that's about 15 minutes away, and so Amtrak to there and then a rental car would be the way to go.

And so I called http://www.amtrak.com/ at 1-800-872-7245 for South Station in Boston to Carvindale, and the Summer price for a round trip ticket for one customer under age 62 for less than a week is: about $366.00.

The time table is: departs Boston at 12:00 o'clock high noon,
arrives: Albany, N.Y. at 5:30 p.m.
departs:        "         at 7:00 p.m. for Chicago
arrives:    Chicago    at 9:45 a.m.
departs:   Chicago   at 4:05 p.m. for Carvindale
arrives:   Carvindale at 9:35 p.m.

Hotel Reservations for the _________ Hotel (by AAA?)
Car Rental from the ____________ Company
drive over to Marion (15 minutes way) to visit Ed
spend a day or two in the area then back on the train;
I've been to Chicago before, so maybe to re-visit for a day?

Will keep you all informed on how Ed is doing, especially after getting the good news that what? Jason is released on a MAss. Habeas Corpus?  8) He sent me that form they give him, copied and enclosed for what they ought to hand out in Merrimack County in Boscawen too, for Reno to pave the way for the future?  ;)

Yours truly, - Joe

coffeeseven

Joe if you can get to Illinois I will be happy to give you a ride to Marion. Still no word from Ed if I am on the approved list.