Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 28

[JosephSHaas]

NHFree cab service, eh?  Thanks C7, hopefully gasoline not to $5.00 per gallon by then. Like in that TV commercial: can I buy the gas +/or the free lunch? 

[coffeeseven]

What you buy while in the police state of Illinois is totally up to you.    Rental car or my Kaffeelastwagen is your choice. Either way I would enjoy meeting you in person.

[JosephSHaas]

What you buy while in the police state of Illinois is totally up to you.    ...

First of all, I've got to have the "lawful money" from the U.S. Gov't to convert into the Coinage Act of 1965 Commerce money to buy stuff, and so the continuing saga of: Where's the money? 

DUAL COMPLAINT to: the Concord District Court. [and U.S. District Court].

To: Stephen R. Monier,
      U.S. Marshal
      55 Pleasant Street, Room 207
      Warren B. Rudman Bldg.
      Concord, N.H. 03301
      603: 225-1632

Dear Marshal Monier:

--In accordance with your May 20th, 2002 Oath of Office "to perform all the duties incumbent upon...(you) under the Const. and laws of the United States." [Title 28 U.S. Code Section 453, http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000453----000-.html and in particular Section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792, I do hereby present my United States Treasury Check No. 8149-00046056 [ 15-51/000] signed by you on April 15, 2008 for $331.22 for to "Pay to the order of KEITH CHAMPAIGNE" whose "order" is that you pay me, as endorsed on the back of the check where he printed: PAY TO THE ORDER OF: JOSEPH S. HAAS" and then signed his name. [ 81499: 000000518: 00046056]

--Note that if you "the drawee" or party directed to pay the amount of the check, do NOT "prompt"ly pay me by Art. 14 of the N.H. Const. and before 2:00 p.m. as by the bank statute for equal treatment, or else to return on the following day, [ Refused to pay on ____day, July __, 2008 @ __:__ a.m./p.m. at: ___________] then I shall proceed to issue to you an R.S.A. Ch. 594:14 Summons [ http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIX/594/594-14.htm ] "to appear before the Concord District Court of the State of New Hampshire, to be holden on the _____ day of August 2008 at __:__ o'clock in the forenoon (afternoon) to answer to a complaint charging you with "Issuing Bad Check" in violation of" RSA Ch. 638:4,I in that you are guilty of issuing a bad check "for the payment of money" and it "is refused by the drawee"! See http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/638/638-4.htm and 638:4,IV(4) to be exact, for this "class B misdemeanor" of a fine-only conviction limit, [RSA Ch. 651:2,IV(a) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/651/651-2.htm = up to a $1,200 fine + RSA Ch. 188-F:31 Penalty Assessment http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XV/188-F/188-F-31.htm of 20%] that I can prosecute in accordance with THE STATE (Rita Premo, Complainant, out of the Berlin District Court Case No. 2001-681) v. ANGELA MARTINEAU, in Vol. 148 N.H. REPORTS 259-264 (2002) where @ pages 261, 263 + 264 is cited my case of:  THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (JOSEPH S. HAAS, JR., COMPLAINANT) v. JAMES H. ROLLINS & a." the Board of Selectmen who lied to my tenants that the Town of Ashland now owned this corporate building by their 1983 Tax Sale that I eventually had my day in court and won a quitclaim deed in 1988 with stipulations of never to attack the title ever again, in 129 N.H. 684-688, David Hackett SOUTER, J. (of Weare) on August 19, 1987 from Plymouth District Court case No. 86-393 who FAILed to cite the State v. Barrels of Liquor case in my Brief from the Prohibition days of "not" malicious when seeking the return of your own property, re: theft by deception of the keys from some of my tenants!

This "information" by way of Summons, now ending of your actions and in-actions as" "against the peace and dignity of the state." [Article 88, Part Second, N.H. Const.]

WARNING: RSA Ch. 638:4,III "It an affirmative defense that the actor paid the amount of the check, together with all costs and protest fees, to the person to whom it was due, within 14 days after having received notice that payment was refused.  The actor's failure to make such payment within 14 days after receiving notice that payment was refused SHALL be PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE of a VIOLATION of paragraph I of this section." (emphasis ADDed.)

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone).

pc: 1. The Public Prosecutor's Office, and 2.) The Attorney General's Office, as a courtesy copy to each, for an endorsement(s), or any objection thereto to please "prompt"ly send to me within five (5) business days as an equivalent to N.H. RSA Ch. 91-A Right to Know, and the "Accountability" Article 8 in our N.H. Const. Part First & Bill of Rights, otherwise there will be no stepping into my PRIVATE prosecutor shoes for a "nol pros"! This case WILL be concluded to the satisfaction of not a mere "in favor" of some judge, but "rigor juris" to the law, and the filing by my State Rep. at the N.H. Legislature & General Court for any Art. 17 + 38 impeachments if there be a tampering with the law! and so a violation of state oath # RSA Ch. 92:2.

footnote #1: As indicated by the federal non-filing from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 this crime occurred on state soil. *

footnote #2: should there happen to be a last-minute federal filing to RSA 123:1, then see also 18 USC 13(a) over at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/13.html because: "Whoever within or upon any of the places now existing or hereafter reserved or acquired...not within the jurisdiction of any State...is guilty of any act or omission which, although not made punishable by any enactment of Congress, would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State...by the laws thereof in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like offense and subject to a like punishment" ...

...but where? as a counter-charge or counter-complaint by a defendant or 3rd party to this U.S. District Court case #07-cr-189 ? of U.S.A. v. Daniel J. Riley et als. Point of Order: As an un-called listed witness and victim in this federal case I demand and claim to be heard at sentencing, currently scheduled for Fri., August 1st '08.   There needing this "payment" to be made to assure that this court and its arm: the U.S. Marshals Service is operating by the law and not conducting business as "out"laws! BEFORE moving onto any sentence. This charge of non-payment to ripen into proof within 14 days, and so by the end of this month. A court in contempt of Congress, canNOT conduct lawful business! There can therefore result in no lawful precepts issued therefrom UNTIL after-the-fact of such payment is made! *

* And the effect of there being a criminal trial against the Marshal in the state court proving what I did write about in my Mon. 3/31/08 @ 7:25 AM e-mail to "Citizens for Legal Responsibility(R)" clr at clr dot org, with their reply of 8:53 AM in regards to their excellent "Judges as Criminals" http://www.clr.org/crimjudg.html website in that: "Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is 'without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.  They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them.  They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.' Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)" to which I add: "Simple Assault" whenever there be any touching by the trespasser upon the victim, and so Ed Brown/ Ed: please send me your copies of the "Transport Orders" from N.H. to Rhode Island, to Ohio, then Oklahoma, to New Jersey, back to Oklahoma, and then to Illinois where you are now.  To see to it that criminal charges be filed for each and every "assault" from this base here in N.H. of no jurisdiction to "start" and "end"! See also: "The Illinois Supreme Court has held that 'if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers.' Von Kettler et al v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)." and so that means U.S. Attorney Thomas P. Colantuono too! from his Feb. 15, 2002 oath of office.

[JosephSHaas]

Public Notice:

Hearing in Concord for Danny then Jason @ 2:00 p.m. + 3:00 p.m. respectfully;

right Keith? re: your PACER e-mails, plus 8:00 a.m. for Bob

and Reno @ __:__ a.m./p.m.?    tomorrow = Thursday, July 17th.

- - Joe

[coffeeseven]

Letter from Ed rec'd today:

Dear Rick,

They just told me that you have been denied. That makes it unanimous all of my visitors have been denied. 10 months and they still have not let me have a visitor. They say I can have immediate family. Sure I can. That's why they move me eight hundred to a thousand miles away and put me in a S.H.V.
These Freemasons are the absolute bottom of the barrel of mankind. I'll grit my teeth and keep my mouth shut. What's happening to me is nothing compared to others.

                Let everyone know. Ed.

     Call and complain. Ed

[JosephSHaas]

Thanks Rick.

My BP-AO629.052 VISITOR INFORMATION Form CDFRM was mailed to Ed today in duplicate (one for the establishment, and one for him) to sign and process to see where it goes.  Hopefully to the visitor "list", as I think this has got to be done for each facility he is at.

That Mr. Wilson never called me back in reference to my telephone call to his office on Tuesday (yesterday).

For #10 the question is what is the length of time you've known this person prior to his current incarceration, and where did the relationship develop?  I put down: "about 20 years since meeting at a Martin J. "Red" Beckman for President Meeting in N.H."

I never heard back from the New Jersey F.C.I. of whether my application was granted or not.  I presume they got it, but that I never followed it up with phone calls.  Ed writes of to call the place to complain, but that I think for the time being, I'll give them a week to 10 days to process it, and if I don't hear back from them by then, then I'll phone them morning, noon and night asking for a Progress Report, until an answer, and if negative, for the reason why, and any appeal.  WHO makes this decision? Mr. Wilson, or the Warden? And is there some kind of board she reports to? like for the county here in N.H. if you don't like a decision of the Superintendent you write to the 3-member Board of County Commissioners like I did once in Grafton County where they changed the first level Head Jailer and some local car dealer/ his friend as the one to appeal too, intermediate, who would just rubber stamp his buddy.

Plus what of these "Freemasons"? Do they wear the ring and flaunt it in his face? Why don't we take THE Constitution and their oaths of office and whatever they've done wrong to violate such to the check-and-balance in the system, like if the judge, then to have him impeached! WHO put Ed in there? McAuliffe.  Did the judge do wrong? Yes: he REFUSED to enter the non- "ceding papers" Ed talked about as evidence to be entered into an Exhibit for the jury.  That's WHY I've been hammering away at this non-jurisdiction issue, and the local judges have recused themselves.  The case currently sits collecting dust in Rhode Island.  Re: of my point of order, when Singal had his goons throw me out of the courtroom! Shame on you Singal! Plus to go after the County goons who go hand-in-hand with the Federal goons by taking excursions across state lines in violation of the law! Liars and thieves!

The pen is mightier than the sword, or this shield or emblem on a ring. That ring was worn by a high mucky muck Mason tenant of mine, who sided with the Town when I was going through a Tax Sale that I eventually won, and so by ink to paper his ring went out the door!  He and his co-horts as the bad apples in the bunch, that the other Masons within the brotherhood ought to extract from within rather than being shamed from without. Or in other words like the priest pedophiles in the Catholic Church: instead of booting them out, they're shipped elsewhere like to a "Ship of Fools" is what Pierce Brosnan, the actor said last night on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno on NBC-TV: put them on a boat and let them kill each other off. Like "Escape from New York", the movie.

So yeah: WHERE is that pen that signed that Federal Bill of Impeachment? against one of the early federal judges here in New Hampshire who would arrive drunk to work.  I think the current crop of judges over there are doped up and so need to be medically analyzed.  Same goes for the N.H. Attorney General's Office.  Re-type of the latest garbage from there to me and of my reply to follow tomorrow after I knock on the door there to see who's home and what they're going to do about my complaint in full.

Yours truly, - - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

... Pierce Brosnan, ....*

* ABBA- Mama Mia on Wonderama 1976

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGMuMrI7YyU

--------------------------------------------------------

Hey Keith: "they're" looking for you!

The http://www.unionleader.com/  reporter that is.

Tue., July 15th '08 @ page #____ +

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Feds+keep+Brown+on+the+move&articleID=8aed1192-4549-464f-a791-ec903f14022f

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

...Re-type of the latest garbage from there to me and of my reply to follow....

"ATTORNEY GENERAL                 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
              33 CAPITOL STREET                CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-6397

KELLY A. AYOTTE                              ORVILLE B. "BUD" FITCH II
ATTORNEY GENERAL                           DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

July 14, 2008

Joseph S. Haas
P.O. Box 3842
Concord, NH 03302

Dear Mr. Haas,

--I am in receipt of your email to the Chief of the Criminal Justice Bureau, wherein you request this office present an indictment to the grand jury for the 'kidnapping' and 'assault' of Daniel Riley, based upon his transportation 'into Maine for an illegal hearing.'

--As I understand the facts, on October 17, 2007, The United States District Court, District of New Hampshire, ordered that Mr. Riley's case be referred to the District of Maine.  Based upon that court order, I do not see any indication of any illegal activity.

--You also request that we 'endorse your authority to approach the grand jury as a private prosecutor for this indictment.'  The New Hampshire common law does not authorize private prosecutions of criminal offenses which may be punished by imprisonment.  State v. Martineau, 148 N.H. 259, 263 (2002).  Both kidnapping and assault may be punished by imprisonment, therefore, you are not authorized under New Hampshire law to act as a private prosecutor.

Sincerely, Lucy H. Carrillo, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Justice Bureau (603)271-3671

- - - - -  Telephone 603-271-3658 * FAX 603-271-2110   *  TDD Access Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 - - - - - "

JSH

[JosephSHaas]

... and of my reply to follow....

....

"To: Lucy H. Carrillo, 'Shyster'**, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Justice Bureau, The State of New Hampshire, Department if IN-Justice, 33 Capitol Street, Concord, N.H. 03301-6397, (603) 271-3671

From: Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, 603: 848-6059, JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com, Founding Member of V.O.C.A.L.S., Inc. [Victims of a Corrupt American Legal System]

RE: Your 3-paragraph / 1-page letter of: July 14, 2008

Dear Assistant Carrillo:

--Thank you for your prompt reply, but that your letter is a piece of garbage!  Since when do we 'base' upon an arbitrary 'order' from a judge rather than the law!?  You make no reference to the paperwork that was presented by me to one of your #__ investigators there by the name of: Paul Broder, who received the actual photocopy of the law in that a 'referr'al can be made to Maine in a CIVIL case withOUT the Defendant's consent, but NOT in a CRIMINAL case that requires him/ the defendant to so motion for OUTside the 'district', otherwise it remains here!  Get with it!  Do your homework for 'complete'ness by Article 14 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights.  This half-assed reply is an injustice and a violation of your boss' RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office.  I appeal your garbage to the top garbage collector there: Kelly A. Ayotte, the Attorney General herself.

--Plus you purposely OVERlooked the fact that my 'presentment' to the Grand Jury will be for a corporation/ fine-only conviction against the County of Strafford for the kidnapping of inmate Dan Riley, thus for me to proceed thereto Dover on the 3rd Friday of August or September for such an attempt that IS allowed by my rights of Free Speech, that if you block or even attempt to do so, you will be added in as a co-defendant* in the Dover District Court to where I will also seek Class B misdemeanor findings after receipt of the Return of the Transport Order showing WHO did these assaults.

Yours truly, Joseph S. Haas, purveyor of the truth / for victory!

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008

-* See RSA Ch. 642:3,I(e) for Hindering Prosecution by 'deception'. That is II. a misdemeanor.

** 'Webster's Third New International Dictionary' (c)1966 @ page 585, deception: 'criminal deception...(is) perversion of the truth in order to defraud...a bank constituted a subterfuge by which the state in effect was emitting bills of credit in the sense forbidden by the Const. -- Harvey Pinney'. ___ "

JSH

[JosephSHaas]

"REAL AMERICAN CONFRONTS THE POLICE STATE CHECKPOINT" Wed. 16 July '08

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=128113

from: http://www.lightupthedarkness.com/

[Romak]

I was under the impression that check points are "legal" so long as they give you an alternate route to avoid them if you choose.

[JosephSHaas]

Public Notice:

Hearing in Concord for Danny then Jason @ 2:00 p.m. + 3:00 p.m. respectfully;

right Keith? re: your PACER e-mails, plus 8:00 a.m. for Bob

and Reno @ __:__ a.m./p.m.?    tomorrow = Thursday, July 17th.

- - Joe

1.) Danny's hearing was today from 1-2:05 p.m. in courtroom #4 with Margo's report in tomorrow's http://www.concordmonitor.com

2.) Bob's hearing is tomorrow, Fri., July 18th @ 8:00 o'clock a.m. in Concord too.

[JosephSHaas]

....

To: Stephen R. Monier,
      U.S. Marshal...

...[ Refused to pay on ____day, July __, 2008 @ __:__ a.m./p.m. at: ___________] then I shall proceed to issue to you an R.S.A. Ch. 594:14 Summons ....

His secretary clocked in the printout of this Reply with copy of the check at about 1:45 p.m. this afternoon...

...before I talked to him in courtroom #4 at about 2:05 p.m. presenting him the check, and for me to collect the "lawful money" down at his office later...

...the later being tomorrow, and if the money is not there for the exchange I'll take that as a: no, in that he and his office refuse to pay.

JSH

[Coconut]

"REAL AMERICAN CONFRONTS THE POLICE STATE CHECKPOINT" Wed. 16 July '08

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=128113

Why does the video say it happened July 27, 2008? Must be the time zones 

[JosephSHaas]

Update:

My arrival to the Rudman Building was at about 7:45 a.m. this morning (Fri., July 18th), hoping to get inside to see the Marshal about cashing my check from him and then over to Bob Wolffe's "hearing" at 8:00 a.m., but that there was a long line down to the sidewalk leading to the front door then snaking around the inside before the metal detector that took about 20 minutes to 8:05 a.m. when and where I was told by the bailiffs that it had been converted to an in-chamber "conference" only in Room 421 on the 4th floor that is OFF LIMITS to the public. And so after I confirmed this by looking on the electronic bulletin board there indicating only his meeting and this Naturalization in courtroom #3, and going to the Clerk's Office, I then proceeded to Room 1303 on the ground floor for the G.S.A. / General Services Administration, where the man on the computer in the back room behind the counter looked up to see who I was, me asking for a copy of the executive branch copy of the landlord agreement with the court(s) [N.H. "District" +/or First Circuit]. Him visibly upset of me even having the audacity to ask for such in a FOIA request, asking me WHO I was after getting his name and card, and me telling him (as if he wasn't informed ahead of time of this Reply and the others by the Marshals that I would be paying him a visit), and all of a sudden, three Deputy Marshals showed up to ask Mr. Rettig if everything was "alright", and "Hey Joe, what are you doing bothering this guy?" type attitude, me replying that this guy wasn't giving me what I requested, as he had just said before that: "That's none of your...________" saying this phrase so slow, that I helped him fill in the blank, and then when the Marshals asked I gave the complete sentence of what he said, and he said: "I didn't say that, you did", the Marshals saying to go see the Clerk, and so I did try and left him a note:

"To Jim Starr, Clerk, U.S. District Court of N.H. @ Concord
RE: FOIA, etc.  [stamped in at 8:27 a.m.]

--Would you please give me a copy of the 'rental agreement' you have from the GSA executive branch of our federal government.

Thank you, - - - - - - - - -  Joe Haas / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302; 603: 848-6059

pc: John H. Rettig, Property Manager (your landlord), Js. C. Cleveland Bldg., 53 Pleasant St., Concord, N.H. 03101? Tel. 603: 225-1615 John.Rettig at gsa dot gov"

--This copy left on Rettig's desk by one of the Baliff's since Rettig was nowhere to be seen on my return when I knocked on his open door not going in like the first time, my guess of maybe to donate a door knocker to him so he's not startled next time when somebody on the public side of the counter gets him riled up.

JSH

P.S. Then I went upstairs to courtroom #3 to see and hear all these foreigners speaking English and other language(s) with their children and toys, with cameras earlier and IN the courtroom, one woman with a bouquet of flowers for the ceremony, the woman in charge by where the divider is to keep the public out from the inner sanctum telling me that there were no programs for the public, and her questioning of WHY I was there, being to alert her of the unlawful and illegal status of the place, Mr. X overhearing the conversation, and yet another suggestion from her too that I ought to see the Clerk. And so downstairs I went again and gave the following:

"To: James R. Starr, U.S. District Court of N.H. @ Concord
RE: Naturalization proceeding to start at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom #3
[stamped in at 8:57 a.m.]

1. Whereas: This court is in non-compliance with 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 +
2. Whereas: these people wishing to be citizens ought to be fully and legally plus lawfully so;

NOW THEREFORE: would you please FILE paperwork with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State BEFORE you allow the Immigration Service of Manchester with the help of Magistrate Muirhead to distribute SEALED documents that will be OUT-OF-ORDER if otherwise not FILED.

Thank you, Joe Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302

pc: The Immigration Dept., Manchester, N.H." -- in hand to Mr. X at the divider after my entry as one of the Bailiffs was shutting the west side door in my face, me going behind him through the east side doorway of this double-door, then out since there was not a single vacant seat for any public member, the swoop of Marshals descending upon the doorway, one of them asking me if I was a "bully" in my childhood, as for the reason for my anger, me telling him no, the anger came later when I see bad apples in the gov't that remain in the barrel without any check-and-balance.

note: this brought to mind yet another angle for this case: Danny, Jason, Bob + Reno: Did your attorneys check to see if any of the Grand Jury members who indicted you were Naturalized here too in this illegal and unlawful place? Maybe there's one of the what? 23 from another state to here, and that state in non-compliance too? http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm

Good luck. - - Joe

Open letter to:

The United States Marshals Service
District of New Hampshire / Headquarters
...
Attention: Freedom of Information Officer

...to look into this matter of illegally spent money from the: (3) First Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, our former N.H. Attorney General who has an office on the top floor there above you that I find revolting, and so a call over to the G.S.A./ General Services Administration at: ______________ in Boston to also get a copy of just WHO actually rents space there, as to sub-let to him from the "district" of New Hampshire? a copy likewise to (4) the GSA agent* in Room #___ of the Js. C. Cleveland Building.  He is supposed to be in Boston, withOUT this branch office! There needing to be an appeal worth appealing to a court that be in compliance with the constitution too! that is NOT the case....

* Reddig is his name, and he's there only on a 4-day work week, Tue. - Fri., but out on vacation this week.

Would you believe that at one time, the 1st circuit judge on the "top"/ upper floor there was so angry at the "below" opinion from the "District" Court that he went into the men's room, and let the water flow over the rim of the toilet, onto the floor, and down into the files "below"?

............No, not really, that's just a joke, or SAMPLE of just how absurd it is to have Howard there dishing out checks to his buddies of the bar for traveling over to Maine, and laughing against us all the way to the bank!

JSH