Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 28

[JosephSHaas]

...

....

... and even got a permission slip from Elaine as a trustee of this Trust that actually owns the land as the property owner....

So what's next?  When is Sonne going to trial on the trespass charge? ____________

Over at Google http://www.google.com for the phrase in quotes of: "Trespass to try title" I found on page #1 there an interesting website* for the "A Treatise on the Trial of Title to Land: Including Ejectment, Trespass to Try Title; Writ of Entry, And Statutory Remedies for the Recovery of Real Property", 2nd Ed. (c) 1886 by Arthur G. Sedgwick and Frederick S. Wait.

* http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=cj89AAAAIAAJ&dq=%22Trespass+to+try+title%22&printsec=Frontcover&source=web&ot=H87_CyERoB&sig=J97KXc2FyuIMA6lzg9UkzSOHMSo&sa=X&oi=book_result&resuum=5&ct=result#PPP1,M1

There being these sayings from my notes:

1.) page 15, Sec. 28: A valid lease necessary.  "One conveying an interest in land, when out of possession, was guilty of maintenance, a penal offense. (the word maintenance, see also p. 27, sec. 52), [the point here of an interest "in" land, v.s. for hiking and camping "on" the land.]

2.) page 17, Sec. 34 for: Title, leases, entry and ouster.

3.) page 18, sec. 37, footnote #3: "See Cooke's Rules and Orders, B. D. Mich. 1654. We find a rule forbidding any attorney from acting as lessee in an ejectment, which shows that the lessee was not an IMAGINARY** person." (emphasis ADded.)

4.) page 21, sec. 41 "He recovers the possession but not the seizen." [The word seize defined at page 634 of my "The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973 as: "To take into LEGAL custody; confiscate." (emphasis ADDed, because WHERE are the "legal" N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 papers from 1-8-17 U.S. Const.!?).]

5.) page 23 of 30-40 years and for a "lifetime".

6.) page 24, sec. 47 see Strother v. Lucas, Vol. __ U.S. Reports ________(1838, from 1832).

7.) p. 26 "he did not intend to disturb the possessor, but only to reach the rents and profits of the estate.5" [compare to what I've written about before of the power to lien, attach and seize being derived from the power of the debtor to issue a writ of elegit, and that a tax is NOT a debt until ripened by due process of law!]

8.) p. 29 "As against a NAKED trespasser, having neither claim nor color of title, proof of a prior undisturbed outstanding possession is sufficient." [emphasis ADDed, as Sonne is not "naked" with his claim of right under the true owner, who was un-disturbed BEFORE this incident!]

9.) sec. 59 "That the sheriff put the plaintiff in quiet and peaceable possession of the land". [Yes!, so to file some County action against the Feds so that the agents: Ed & Elaine, for the true corporate owner, can be released on a Writ of Habeas Corpus AFTERwards.]

10.) Trespass to Try Title, pages 33-47 = sections 64-92.

(a) Sec. 64 "The complainant, or party deforced, was called the demandant; the defendant, or party in possession the tenant."

(b) p. 33-34 "The foundation of a real action is the alleged wrongful / OCCUPATION and WITHHOLDING of the demandant's land by the tenant." [emphasis ADDed for the Feds being the hypocrites of this WRONGFUL "withholding" by their outlaw "occupation"!] footnote #1 = Graves v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co., 44 N.H. 462-____ (______) foot. 3 = personal rights Plympton v. Baker 10 Dick (Mass.) 474.

(c) p. 35 Sec. 67 "Possessory Writs settled disputed questions of possession.  The higher writs...went further and established the whole right to the land, both of property and of possession."

(d) sec. 69 Saxons, Writs of rights.

__________________________________________________________________

Thus to copy pages 37-42 here for this sec. 71+ about something I've never read about before, and by the common law still in existence in N.H. by numerous case laws cited of some "Writ of Formedon". ___ N.H. ___  [see also p. 41, sec. 79.] Can somebody with more computer savvy than me relay by cut and paste or whatever these pages to here or my e-mail? (to copy by download to pdf?) It reads about the early settlers of New England diverting AWAY from the British way of doing things with fictions** and concentrating more on combating violations of the truth (p. 39), one such case noted at p. 40 in sec. 77, footnote #1 of Frost v. Cloutman, 7 N.H. 9-__ (____). See also page 41 of some Mass. statute barrier against the Feds to be "completely barred" when the individual obtains a state Writ of Entry. There also being at page 42, sec. 81 Trespass to Try Title footnote #3 = Towle v. Ayer, 8 N.H. 57-___ (_____). Then onto pages 43 + 44 about South Carolina, that abolished this trespass to try title in 1873 (cc: Rita Bixby, whose family posted their land by the NO TRESPASSING sign, but gov't goons trespassing anyway on a statute done away with way back then!); p. 45, sec. 90 for Alabama; and p. 46, sec. 91 for Texas, and ending with p. 47, sec. 92.

--So to read these cases, and attach my permission slip copy, to eventually get into evidence as Exhibit #__ in a Sullivan County Court Case #_____ of Haas v. Marshal Monier & his goons, at the Newport County Seat, to my Petition for a Writ of Formedon.    -- And/or for Sonne to use this information here and/or as put to good use in "this" court case in "that" court case of trespass against him.  You'd think that some attorney reading this would volunteer to make chapter #__ of Ed's book.
________________________________________________________________________

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

Here are the other cases on the print-out I just made from:

A.) p. 105 of 956 @ 86%=

(1) Ela v. Pennock, 38 N.H. 154-____ (_____)

(2) Cutting v. Pike, 21 N.H. 347-____ (_____)

B.) p. 109 = page 41, sec. 79, foot,. 2 = Writ of Entry, sur disseizen

Potter v. Baker, 19 N.H. 166- ____ (_____).

[JosephSHaas]

Update: for John Eidsmoe*, see http://dixienet.org/New%20Site/index.shtml

"The Arkansas chapter of the League of the South will co-host with the Peroutka Law Form an 'Institute On The Const.' from the 2 August - 18 October in Mammoth Spring, Arkansas.  Classes will be presented by Professor John Eidsmoe* of Faulkner University."

JSH

In today's http://www.unionleader.com

NEW HAMPSHIRE SUNDAY NEWS @ page #____

"John Stossel: Yes, you do have a right to self-defense"

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=John+Stossel%3a+Yes%2c+you+do+have+a+right+to+self-defense&articleId=b52463dd-41e0-492f-8c58-422067c2cee2

JSH

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

OPEN LETTER to: John Stossel [if my Comment of last night is not printed]

Here's the re-type:

"Thank you John. I like your statement in paragraph #9 of 18 at half-time warning us of the 'homegrown tyrants'.  See what John Eidsmoe* wrote about this on page 2 of 8 at his http://www.eagleforum.org/court-watch/alerts/2003/oct03/Eidsmoe-10-08-03.shtml that: 'The rule of law restrains both the people and their rulers.  Where law does not restrain the people, the result is anarchy.  Where law does not restrain the rulers, there is tyranny.  Those who believe in the rule of law must be equally opposed to both.' - - - - I hope to see you back in N.H. soon, like to investigate the latest law-breaking by the Feds.  'They' are shipping inmates over to Portland, Maine OUTside the 'district' withIN the 1st 'circuit' in violation of 18 USC 3232, that can ONLY happen IF the defendant makes a motion, or in a civil case to there or Rhode Island.  My Federal Rep Hodes and Sen. Gregg say: tough sh**.  Can you believe this?! re: the Ed Brown anti IRS co-conspirators case of USA v. Dan Riley et al.  The end justifies the means!?  To hell with procedural due process!?  Oath takers allowed to break the law!? Sociopaths! They're the REAL outlaws!"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
....

[JosephSHaas]

To: The Concord, N.H. Police Department
      & The Concord District Court

RE: Report of Crime and Complaint

Who:  Stephen Robert Monier (of Goffstown and), the United States Marshal, at exactly 2:05 o'clock p.m.* was presented**** in hand one of his checks by me to him in courtroom #4 **at 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, standing next to him standing too on Thursday, July 17th '08 for payment***, and so by R.S.A. Ch. _____ since this was after 2:00 p.m. I asked that he meet me down at his office later for payment (the next day), but that at about 8:15 a.m. on Friday, July 18th he was nowhere to be found when I did visit the receptionist there inquiring on his whereabouts, and she said to me that she did not know of his location...

-*** What
--** Where
---* When
Why:  ______
**** How

...Such refusal to cash is the offense of: "Issuing Bad Check" in violation of R.S.A. Chapter 638:4 for which he has until Friday, August 1st @ 8:14 a.m. to pay up or else this becomes a prima-facie case.

Why: 

1. The payment shall be made to me in accordance with the law, since he is supposed to be "law enforcement".  The law is both Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 5 U.S. Const. of "To coin Money, regulated the Value thereof" and the Coinage Act of 1792 and as backed up by our Article 97, Part 2, New Hampshire Constitution, as annotated with the "Jackson" case and Vol. 6 Laws of N.H., Ch. 28 @ page 155 for 1794 for coins to be reckoned in "dollar"s and "valued" in the quality of gold and silver metal in the quantity prescribed.

2. But if his court of which he is "the arm" is not constitutional, but instead is strictly "Commerce" then to substitute the above Coinage Act of 1792 with the Coinage Act of 1965 of which is supposed to run concurrent and not replace the former with the latter. See for a discussion of this "Commerce Court"  at page 3 of 5 of the http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=us/261/428.html website printout of the "KELLER v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER CO." U.S. Supreme Court case of 261 U.S. 428 (1923).

--Either way there has to be an Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 "Consent" from the N.H. Legislature (See Attorney Larry Becraft's excellent website of http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm from: Hunstsville, Alabama) that was given by our N.H. General Court to the Feds on June 14, 1883 in R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 but that was conditional, and which has yet to be executed by the filing of said paperwork with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State.  And he has the audacity to execute orders therefrom such a court in the criminal realm!? Such arrogance is a "claim without right".  It is brute force as a militant, using force as evidence, when THE evidence in the certificate of non-filing with the gold seal was refused to be marked as an Exhibit in the original Ed Brown anti-I.R.S. case! but ought to be offered into evidence at the Friday, August 1st sentencing at ___:___, ___:____, + ___:____for three of "The Freedom Four", Dan Riley, Jason Gerhard, and Cirino Gonzalez [Bob Wolffe's sentencing day on: August ____, 2008 @ ___:___ o'clock a.m./p.m.]

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - -  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Telephone 603: 848-6059 (cell phone); e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

pc: Ed & Elaine Brown & "The Freedom Four".

[keith in RI]

jason's sentencing has been reset for july 31st, at 11:00am. i think in concord.... dannys may be delayed as his court appointed "a-turn-me-in" has gotten his way and danny has been ordered to have a psych evaluation within 15 days. if danny is found not competent to be sentenced they will probably order him into a mental hospital until which time they determine he is competent to be sentenced, then they will sentence him and he will begin serving his time.



07/09/2008       RESCHEDULING NOTICE OF HEARING as to Jason Gerhard: Presentence Conference set for 7/25/2008 10:00 AM before Chief Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine. (jar) (Entered: 07/09/2008)
07/21/2008       RESCHEDULING NOTICE OF HEARING as to Jason Gerhard: Sentencing set for 7/31/2008 11:00 AM before Chief Judge George Z. Singal.The court has allotted 1 hour for the hearing. Please contact the court immediately if you anticipate the hearing will exceed the allotted time. (jar) (Entered: 07/21/2008)

[keith in RI]

i forgot to pass along that eds birthday was yesterday the 22nd.

[JosephSHaas]

The 1960s T.V. Batman (Adam West):

"Evil triumphs temporarily, but never conquers."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtrP5UUO7A0

reference the actress: Kathy Kersh, as Cornelia

who happened to guest star on "The Beverly Hillbillies" today,

http://www.tvland.com/  for http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0522575/

Modification: http://www.robintheboywonder.com

[JosephSHaas]

Tomorrow are two events:

A.) The Strafford County Grand jury in Dover, N.H. officially investigates the kidnapping of Dan Riley to Portland, Maine in violation of 18USC3232; looking toward a "Presentment" by them against the agents +/or corporation for the felony crime of kidnapping;+

B.) More crimes of assault to kidnap will be committed by both the Strafford County Sheriff's Office and Deputy Marshals of the United States Marshals Service withIN the District of New Hampshire, and so:

1. To await any conference call from the foreman of the Grand Jury to my cell phone to invite me in to their chambers to speak on the paperwork submitted to them by Clerk ________ @ __:__ o'clock a.m. on Fri., July 25th '08;

2. To find out from the Transport Order illegally issued out of the N.H. District of the U.S. District Court, signed by (Deputy) Clerk ______________ / or Judge _____________ on July ___, 2008 WHO received it to use the excuse of:  Respondeat Superior for WHEN I find out the name(s) of the assaulter(s) ___________ + _____________ and kidnapper(s) ___________ + ______________ as they operate as a tag-team [ (a) one the perpetrators who commit the crime by their carry-outside the law, as out-laws, from the Latin word perpetrare, to accomplish: meaning done and completed plus finished, also to: "bring to pass" as to the passport, and past the port of Portsmouth into Maine too? Or is there a switch at the border? I think the accord or agreement, from the word of accordare of "to be heart-to-heart with" is for them to tag-team from point A (the jail) to point B (the court) together, but that by law, has to be withIN the bounds of the district, not districts in the plural! and (b)  the other the "escorts" by contract, who are conveniently the witnesses to such a crime! but when told in writing and verbally by me BEFORE the fact that such is illegal, they are accessories before, during, and after the fact!!] and so:

3. the former assaults to report to the Dover District Court in a criminal complaint by me for which a summons can issue for them to answer to this charge on: August __, 2008 @ _:__ o'clock a.m., as the ones who "accomplished" this feat.  The word accomplished meaning "Sophisticated" as in "Lacking natural simplicity" by making something "Complex or complicated" as in mixing apples and oranges as they say with Local Federal Rule 77.5 as their excuse they gave my Federal Rep Hodes' receptionist who took it hook-line-and sinker BUT that to the Districts of Maine and Rhode Island is ONLY allowed in a CIVIL case! Them "Sophist"s, no doubt about it, defined as: "One skilled in devious argumentation." The word: devious defined as: "Deviating from" something, and that something being the law! Them "roundabouts" defined as "circuitous" as in yes: withIN the First Circuit headquartered in Boston for: MAss., Maine, N.H., Vermont, Conn. Rhode Island and Puerto Rico, but that the law reads of that "all" meaning every proceeding in the criminal case shall or must, as the mandatory requirement, be withIN the "district" UNLESS the Defendant motions otherwise that is NOT the case here as DANIEL RILEY never filed such a motion.  There was an "Emergency Order" issued by N.H. Judge McAuliffe to have the Maine judge ENTER the case by being invited INto N.H., but not to "pull" the case over to him in Maine! Nor was it "pushed" there as ONLY the Defendant can do so by Motion!** This deceit or trick must end! It's "cleaver" of "them" being the "expert(s) to seize", but such personal seizure is wrong and AGAINST the law! Their/ the U.S. gov't deception is "to take in" the County and State that ought to be the check-and-balance against this corruption not to mislead down the wrong path but to take the main road, and that is from point A (jail) to point B of the correct court in Concord, N.H. Their delusion or "false belief held in spite of invalidating evidence" has got to stop.  THE evidence is THE law, and to SAY otherwise to the WRITING as pre-scribed is simply wrong!  And so what's next? To also report this crime to:

4.) The F.B.I. (The Federal Bureau of Investigation*) in Portland withIN the federal system to give them a chance to check-and-balance from the inside, and:

5.) to get the name of the (Deputy) Clerk ___________in the U.S. District Court in Portland who illegally scheduled this hearing for tomorrow, July 25th @ 9:30 a.m. and report his/her actions to the federal A.O.C. in Washington for reprimand, +/or

6.) To get the Portland, Maine police involved in being a witness to this hearing in courtroom #__ tomorrow, and investigate* by asking the victim Dan Riley IF he has filed such a motion** and if NOT, then to be ready to pounce for an arrest on the charge of kidnapping when the U.S. Marshal or Strafford County Sheriff's Office vehicle leaves the federal courthouse and enters upon city and state soil for jurisdiction; +/or

7.) Also to have the Cumberland County Sheriff's Office as back-up to the City Police. To give them a call right now and get back to here with a Progress Report, of progressing or moving toward this goal of an arrest! To advance toward the unfolding of this house of cards, "them" dealing from a dirty deck!: The unlawful and illegal court in Concord, N.H. as there has been no fulfillment of the N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 requirement from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. in this double-filing state whereas Maine is a single-filing state in compliance and ought to tell the N.H. court to "wise-up" BEFORE having accepted to enter withIN this case, but them now corrupt by "pulling" the case to over there! http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.  The main spider here being McAuliffe, inviting Singal into his web, as McAuliffe bows out, but Singal wanting to do business in his own web.  That web is legal, but requiring the fly or victim to do battle there is not!

JSH

SAMPLE (first Draft) PETITION TO THE GRAND JURY:
Via the Superior Court Clerk's Office, with Judge's endorsement.

Would the Grand Jury please inquire into the crime of kidnapping by the Sheriff's Office in their June 26th illegal and unlawful transport of inmate Dan Riley of Dover to over to a pre-sentence hearing in Portland, Maine, to either indict or present that officers ____________ + ___________ can make a defense of Respondeat Superior to have the High Sheriff answer, and PREVENT it from happening again on or before next Friday, July 25th as the next appointed time @ 9:30 a.m. in Portland, Maine.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) E-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com.

[JosephSHaas]

...
--The F.B.I. Officer in Bedford, N.H. at 472-2224 told me today ...

...at 10:50 a.m. to in effect, get lost she said to continue my complaints in the vicious circle of withIN the other branches of both the federal and state plus county governments.

[JosephSHaas]

Ann, Case Working Manager for
Fed. Rep. Tom Allen
57 Exchange Street, Suite 302
Portland, Maine 04101
207:774-5019 said just a few minutes ago: [after my call to their D.C. office at 202:225-6116]

that "we" don't care whether the money Tom votes for out of the Budget Committee in Washington, our nation's capitol to the judicial branch is mis-spent by First Circuit Judge Jeffrey Howard of Boston, MAss. and Concord, N.H. or the judges, clerks and attorneys involved or not, you are NOT his constituent and he will NOT investigate toward an impeachment either as this single violation of 18 USC 3232 is NOT a "high crimes and Misdemeanors" in the plural needed for such by Art. II, Sec. 4 of the U.S. Const., and she said she knows, since being on the job for 12 years there, and to see also Art. I, sec. 3, cl. 6+7 of 7 for trial in the Senate. BUT that there have been numerous illegal trips, in the plural from N.H. to Maine, and my Fed. Rep. Paul Hodes KNOWS it, but protects his buddy of the bar, so what next? to re-contact Fed. Rep. Shea-Porter? and Sen. John E. Sununu to endorse my complaint to the sub-committee of the House Judiciary, since Sen. Judd Gregg said to get lost too.

....

11/26/2007 ....

... him saying that he will not investigate to prove that N.H. is in non-compliance to advise his Maine judge Singal that he ought not to travel into non-jurisdictional waters, and that it is up to a Congressional Investigation since these are Legislative courts....

Here's a re-type of my e-mail letter of exactly 5:00 p.m. today;

"To: Federal Representative Tom Allen
1127 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202: 225-5590
Fax: 202: 225-5590
[e-mail: rep.tomallen at mail.house.gov ]

http://www.nrcm.org/congressionaldelegation.asp

Dear Rep. Allen:

--This is to follow-up my call to your office this afternoon a few minutes ago where your secretary was nice enough to tell me that you're in Maine now, and back to work in Washington, D.C. next week, and as a member on the: (1) Budget, and (2) Energy & Commerce Committees.

--That's 'very' appropriate since what I'd like to see is more efficiency in the federal government for my tax dollars as extracted by my boss at work.  I too own some land in Maine and used to live in Blue Hill.

--Now here's what I'd like for you to investigate, as like to start a Congressional Investigation of ALL fifty (50) states maybe, but to start somewhere, and that is for this Maine-New Hampshire connection, of WHY is it that Portland Maine Judge George Singal is coming to the New Hampshire court when he should realize that N.H. is in non-compliance with Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.  He was given the ball as they say for the Ed Brown anti-I.R.S. co-conspirator cases to deal with pre-trial motions, and so in a way: GREAT that he from an in-compliance state might travel over here to a non-filing state to tell us to get our act together, in that there are none of the required filings by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the state statute.

--Attorney Larry Becraft from Alabama has a website of these single, and double filing states, with N.H. and MAss. in non-compliance (Florida too, to the governor's office), but Vermont + Maine in compliance by the mere filing of their deeds with the Registrar of Deeds in these single-filing states.

--Is there a special fund that these monies come out of?  And if so, can that person accept some audit of these funds to like send the bill against the judge's salary in N.H. who should have done internal correction in the first place?

--Your comments and suggestions are most welcome, and for details on this, see my Reply #6719 over at page 448 at http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.6705 reference the Portland, Maine F.B.I. agent telling me to contact you, as the only one of four listed without having to jump over the website hurdle to get your e-mail address.

Thank you, - - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone)."

JSH

P.S. The website was (past tense) working, but not now, for all four; so see http://tomallen.house.gov/

[JosephSHaas]

1.) Maine in-action:

a.) The Cumberland County Sheriff's Office at 1-800-266-1444 press 4 for Detective.  She said for a crime outside the federal building of to contact the Portland P.D....

b.) at 1-207-874-8300 @ about 12:30 p.m. today when the woman said that putting a citizen's arrest on the hood of the car as it left the federal enclave onto state soil was not a good idea and to exhaust all my N.H. remedies first, and so back to:

2.) New Hampshire "action"(?):

...I called the Dover Police Department at 603: 742-4646, to complain over the head of Detective Andreta to Lt. Turlomesian is his supervisor, and so she took a note for him out-to-lunch to return my call of to look into this planned assault and kidnapping either later today or tomorrow (during when the Grand Jury meets to maybe help them in their investigation for a "Presentment") for illegal transport over to Portland, Maine in violation of 18 USC 3232 and so working my way up the totem pole to the Chief (who is either elected or appointed __, which one? I asked with no info) who takes the RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office to honor the Const. and laws of N.H. including R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 that when the feds are in a non-filing mode from the U.S. Const. the Chief of Poilce (C.O.P.) is also supposed to honor too by RSA Ch. 42:1 (but not so at the County Commissioner level, since they only subscribed to the N.H. Const. but are supposed to sign for both) that there ought to be a check-and-balance by the local police not needing any opinion or order to do so by big sister, Attorney General Kelly Ayotte & her gang of thugs who divert their eyes from the paperwork I gave to their Investigator Paul Broder who still insists we live in the First Judicial "District", when it's actually the "District of N.H." withIN the First Judicial "Circuit", and so the pre-trial and pre-sentencing and "all proceedings" STOP at the border between here and Maine because there is NO inmate Motion nor is this a civil case, the harping by Deputy Clerk Dan Lynch to Fed. Rep. Hodes' receptionist being a lie that Local Civil Rule 77.5 applies in what? "Emergency" situations!?  SHOW ME THE LAW that says so.  Yeah: just like Ed Brown was saying from his home in Plainfield, N.H. in Sullivan County to the I.R.S.: "Show me the law"; reference this other law that turns a civil rule into a criminal rule!  It doesn't exists, and I've dared Hodes' office manager in Concord to write up this excuse as for NOT endorsing my complaint to the sub-committee of the House Judiciary in Washington, the Budget Committee allowing the Appropriations Bill to make it through the House then Senate and signed by the President for the Treasurer to send $x,xxx,xxx.xx to the federal judicial branch, BUT for WHERE is the oversight when that tax money that I paid into the system at work is illegally spent on transporting inmates against the law!? and reimbursing the attorneys at about $4.00/gallon of gas plus their travel and attendance time in and outside of court?! To contact the Treasury? next.  WHO there to look into this?  The Treasurer of the United States, or the Secretary of the Treasury?  A full circle from there being NO delegation of authority letter from him to the I.R.S. to begin with, and there being NO enforcement clause in the 16th Amendment anyway for that "lay and collect" phrase, of to lay meaning to apply or impose, and so by the latter of to levy and collect, but that's redundancy as George Orwellian "1984" and double-talk of to collect and collect, against the Ninth Amendment and so I choose the apply word of to request and tell the I.R.S.: request denied! as I did way back in their case #M.83-50-D that I won in 1983 with the help of authors: Otto Skinner, and Martin J. "Red" Beckman when he came to N.H. running for President of the United States, it looks like the new one on Jan. 20, 2009 to take this case too for some pardons as outline in Aaron Russo's "Freedom to Fascism" movie.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

Update: the woman who answered the phone at the number below, said: F.B.I.  I asked what this means. She said: Federal Bureau of Investigation. I asked how I can get a case # to start an investigation.  She transferred me over to Mr. Lector (like a combination of the words: Lex Luthor) who said that they investigate federal crimes, like Title 18 is THE federal Criminal Code, but NOT section 3232 as any outlaw activity within the other branch of gov't cannot be dealt with, as exempt by the lower echelons of the executive branch. Oh Really? Like embezzlement is not a crime? Come on! Like in that T.V. commercial with the dog: no you come on says or thinks out load the dog: you think you own me?  Oh yeah you do.  Or in this case: who is the master and who is the (public) servant?  When the servant is told to spend money on this and switches it to that, or as in the lawful to the illegal that's O.K.!?  You have got to be shitting me!  I think there needs to be a re-view of their job description by their bosses in Washington to call next; __. And if they aren't doing their jobs, then to be fired!

And while I'm poking around PACER, Joe, here is Wolffe's entry regarding the change of plea.

11/26/2007   NOTICE OF HEARING as to Robert Wolffe: Change of Plea Hearing set for 12/7/2007 01:30 PM before Chief Judge George Z. Singal at the Rudman Courthouse, Concord, NH. (dae) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

Thanks Richard.  Maybe before then the F.B.I. Portland office will advise him of their investigation that New Hampshire is in non-compliance with Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution to N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 and that he ought to stop wasting taxpayer money into non-jurisdictional waters.  To call the FBI in a few minutes (from Reply #____ above) and report back to here with what they say in the modification this this.* -- Joe

Modification.  See Reply #___ on page #__ here for a typing of my letter to the F.B.I. in Portland, Maine. It's on page 9 of my Archives as #121 to be exact, at the top of the page for Friday., Nov. 2nd of almost four (4) weeks ago @ 1:46 p.m.  At the 1-207-774-9322 # from the http://boston.fbi.gov/me.htm website I told the receptionist I was disappointed that they never even acknowledged receipt of my Nov. 2 '07 letter; she immediately referred me over to Mr. ________ who never gave me his name, (not that I cared to ask anyway) him saying that he will not investigate to prove that N.H. is in non-compliance to advise his Maine judge Singal that he ought not to travel into non-jurisdictional waters, and that it is up to a Congressional Investigation since these are Legislative courts.  I told him that I've already tried that, by contacting my Federal Reps [Shea-Porter first and then Hodes, plus Sununu gave me the Fed AOC #, and Gregg just a plain waste of time] but that they don't care to correct their wrongs.  Neither do the state, county nor town officers care to check-and-balance, as by the governor to assert his Art. 41 powers to enforce all legislative mandates as by the "shall" word in RSA Ch. 123:1, and so of course what is the only result being of to live in a lie, of Wonderland, seeing Alice Rabbits and Mad Hatters, etc., or standing on your own turf with the truth but the liars come to get you anyway!

Dis-gusted, -- Joe, with Art. 10 Rights of Revolution, but when you exercise them, they say wrong apparatus, as in what? to exercise them in some OTHER state!?  You have got to be shitting me!

[JosephSHaas]

Update:

My call to the Portland court at 1-207-780-3356 about 1/2 hr. ago at just before 4:00 o'clock p.m. was made when the man told me that there is nothing on the docket for Maine tomorrow (as indicated at PACER for 7/9 for 7/25 @ 9:30 a.m. in Portland for Danny), and so it moved to N.H. or done-away with until after the psycho-val?  The N.H. court phones close down at 4:00 p.m. even though the clerk's office closes at 4:30 p.m. so somebody might try attending this supposed hearing tomorrow as on the electronic internet bulletin board as un-changed in place, but not time, but really changed in place but same time? what a mess! and send them a bill for your travel time to attend what? nothing? -- Joe

[keith in RI]

here is jasons latest docket entries. sentence range is 5-6 years i think, probation has recommended 11, and the govt is asking for more due to the "nature" of the crimes.... the govt keeps calling the browns fugitives from justice but in reality i think a better title for them is fugitives FOR justice!! it is really all they ever wanted.........


07/25/2008       Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge George Z. Singal: PRESENTENCE CONFERENCE as to Jason Gerhard held on 7/25/2008. Sentencing is set for 7/31/08 at 11:00 AM. The Court has reserved 2 hours for this proceeding. The Court puts the defendant on notice that the Court has not decided but may impose a variant sentence above the guidelines. Government will be filing a Motion for a Sentence above the guideline range by the end of the day. The defendant shall file his response by 5PM on Monday, July 28, 2008. Defendant shall file brief by noon on Tuesday, July 29 with regards to the affidavit referenced in paragraph 20a of the presentence report and any other legal aspects discussed at the conference held today. The government shall file their responsive brief by noon on Wednesday, July 30. (Court Reporter: FTR) (Govt Atty: Robert Kinsella) (Defts Atty: Stanley Norkunas) (USP: Melissa Ellworthy)(Total Hearing Time: 20 mins)(CJA Time: 20 mins) (jar) (Entered: 07/25/2008)

07/25/2008    482    NOTICE of Seeking Upward Departure and Deviation by USA as to Jason Gerhard. (Kinsella, Robert) (Entered: 07/25/2008)

[JosephSHaas]

here is jasons latest docket entries... the govt is asking for more due to the "nature" of the crimes.... the govt keeps calling the browns fugitives from justice but in reality i think a better title for them is fugitives* FOR justice!! ....

* Thanks Keith. Plus look up that word: fugitive in the dictionary: "Running** or having run away." And so run away from what? "fleeing, as from justice" is used as an example in my "The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973 @ page 289, and "a runaway" plus another example of "fugitive hours" as opposed to days, weeks, fortnights and months in this case.

--See also the definition of the word flee @ page 273 with two meanings: "1. To run away, as from trouble or danger." and "2. To pass swiftly away; vanish."

--So is it a crime to run away from trouble***and stand your ground on PRIVATE soil against a federal gov't "running"** amok? as in both the unlawful and illegal, by 1-8-17 U.S. Cons't to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 Reference: http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm Who is doing the most running of any variety? Ed or the gov't? And what about Article 10 for both a right and duty, both!!

--The word: runaway @ page 616 has it to mean: "Escaping or having escaped from captivity or control." In Ed's case the control that "they" wanted was for by bail conditions.  And so WHY didn't they go after Ed & Elaine for the crime of escape? Because they don't dare to.  It would expose the govt's corruption! WHY doesn't each and every one of these Freedom Four, put their sentencing in abeyance until AFTER this charge is dealt with.  Isn't the gov't out-of-order? The escape came BEFORE the help from outside.

--The escape word is defined at page 245 as meaning, among others: "Temporary freedom from trouble." And "trouble"*** @ page 738 includes: "A condition of pain, disease, or MAL-function" [emphasis ADDed for like the example of "heart trouble" and the malicious prosecution by these "outlaws"; "To TAKE pains" (emph. ADDed), malicious from the word malice of in "spite" as in page 671: "Regardless of", and so with regard (p. 594) meaning "To take INTO account" (emph. ADDed), then with the suffix -less of with LESS regard or NOT taken INto, but OUT of an account, then what is the account? The account (p. 5) is: 1"b. A written or oral explanation, as of blame." But WHO to blame for NOT filing the N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 documents?  I thought it was the G.S.A./ General Services Administration, with the blueprints, but that Olga for my Federal Rep, Carol Shea-Porter in Dover thinks otherwise and is having Congressional Research in Washington look into this, but when for an answer? AFTER the sentencing!? Isn't this a criteria for to "take into account" defined as "To take into consideration"? (p. 154): "A factor**** in forming a judgment." As in to judge what the sentence should be of NO days, as there being NO jurisdictional authority! So to use the "escape clause" in the Ninth Amendment against these "outlaws: (p. 504): defined as "A person excluded from normal legal protection and rights. And so HOW were Ed & Elaine EX-cluded from this Art. 12 protection?  They paid their property taxes, but were "deprive(d) of the protection of the law."  The law IS the const., the U.S. Code and statutes at large are inferior to such.  So when were the federal statutes first lawfully operative in New Hampshire? if they ever were! _____

--Is this phrase: "fugitives from justice" in written form in the P.S.I.? And if so, in what context? An "Important" individual is a "a man of some account." (p. 5). 

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

P.S. **** A factor or "variant" is the word used in the 7/25 court docket entry to try to impose a sentence ABOVE the guidelines, but that this other variant or variable of there being NO filing, as in the math example for the word variable @ p. 765 of meaning: "Having no FIXED quantitative value" in numbers [emphasis ADDed, because like I've written in the paragraph above for the G.S.A. there has to be a fix as @ p. 270 "To ascribe; place: fix blame" on somebody who is supposed to file (in definition #5 and THEN to) "7. To set right; repair." that they thought Ed meant of 9. in the Informal of "To take revenge upon, get even with" but back to the word important @ p. 354 again for the synonym of: significant, @ p. 649 also meaning notable, p. 485 that this Judge Singal sees the word "striking" therein the definition, but mis-applies it as in definition # 9 of the word @ p. 686 of "To eliminate" as in "struck out the error", but that the error is in THEIR ways, or should I say, non-ways as in the non-filing! Thus to go to definition #10 of "To come upon; discover." And so back to the word notable beyond just "striking" to "Worthy of notice", and so leading onto the notarized and sealed documents. And THEN the judge can be "A person OF note or distinction" (emph. ADDed), as in @ p. 210 of distinguishing or differentiating the difference between a filing and a non-filing plus for cause and effect, thus being of: honor. Otherwise the fix is in, as they say: fix, p. 270, #10 "To prearrange the outcome of (a contest) by unlawful means." Thus when the fix is in by the judicial branch un-corrected, sending the victims to the so-called F.C.I.'s, to un-fix by an Executive Pardon from the President of the United States of America!