Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 29

[JosephSHaas]

** Reference: my Reply #7683 above.

"Monier is a sociopath".            A sociopath says: the end justifies the means.

I've written this before, and just recently found a website that reports that: "He earned his Bachelor of Arts degree, magnum cum laude, from Saint Anselm College in 1974 majoring in sociology with a minor in criminal justice." http://www.zoominfo.com/search/PersonDetail.aspx?PersonID=21957622 see also http://www.anselm.edu for Father Jonathan DeFelice, O.S.B., President (and who, BTW was on the committee that formed the N.H. Legislature's Judicial Conduct Committee / J.C.C.separate from the Supremes that declared it out-of-order.)

My question is: what did/do they teach there, and how could Monier go so wrong? ....

[JosephSHaas]

** Ditto.

Continued from Reply #7171 above...

18.) My Reply #5853 of 9/28/2007 at 11:30 AM over at http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.5850 since moved to Reply #5745 on page 384 at http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.5745 sites http://makethestand.com/article76.html wherein I've concluded therefrom that "Marshall Monier is a 'SOCIOPATH' according to" this website since the "ingredients of such a person" are: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html that: among others, "They never recognize the rights of others." "Can create, and get caught up in a complex belief about their own powers." And: "The end always justifies the means." ....

[JosephSHaas]

Monier gets the gavel from the judge in court:

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=z4OmRsiZGMg&feature=related [ 40 seconds].

Modification:

See also: http://allaboutfrogs.org/stories/king.html over to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wONKTobZgP8&feature=related [ 8 min., 46 sec. ]

for "The Frogs That Demand a King" B&W silent film from 1922, by Ladislas Starevich, 1882-1965, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladislas_Starevich

The analogy is Monier, appointed by our President (Zeus) and out-of-control, his appetite of to eat up our freedom by jailing us for the brainwashing that what he says, not what is written, is THE truth! when what he says is really a lie! The TRUTH is that there is NO federal filing to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. and he knows it, and anybody that dares contest the non-filing is going to get those Zeus thunder-bolts for their petitions for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.  That is until the next President is elected and will rule in truth starting January 20, 2009. 

[keith in RI]

elaine writes to me that she has been sent to the "maxximumest" security prison for women. she is in her cell 23 hours a day wearing an orange jumpsuit. i will post the text of her letter on freethebrowns.com tommorow  morning.
  also jasons last letter to me received today is dated 8-8-08 mailed the 9th and received today. so apparently he is still at essex,  or at least as of friday he was. he has sent me the text of his statement in court at his sentencing. it will also be posted on freethebrowns.com tommorow morning for those interested in reading it.


THE TEXT OF JASONS STATEMENT IS NOW ON FREETHEBROWNS.COM

[JosephSHaas]

elaine writes...

  also jasons last letter...

THE TEXT OF JASONS STATEMENT IS NOW ON FREETHEBROWNS.COM  *

Thank Keith. * = http://freethebrowns.com/?page_id=21 to be exact.

[JosephSHaas]

To: Joseph S. Haas
      P. O. Box 3842
      Concord, N.H. 03302
      603: 848-6059

RE: Pledge #1

I, _________________________  *, if and when I am (re-) elected to this federal post, will:

(A) find out WHO this federal agent is who is suppose to file these N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 documents with our New Hampshire Office of Secretary of State, and;

(B) will compel him or her to do their job, plus;

(C) will endorse any and all complaints of victims who have been damaged therefrom such non-filing for a specific performance charge to the United States Court of Claims.

____________________________________________________________________________

*

1. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

2. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

5. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

6. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

7. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

8. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Signed, in person at The Summer Picnic & Candidates' Stump on Oak Ledge Farm in Belmont, N.H. this twelfth (12th) day of August 2008, in the afternoon.
     

[JosephSHaas]

Pledge #2:

-- I, ____________________ *, as a Constitutional Officer of the United States of America

do hereby pledge that I will continue to honor my oath of office signed on _____day,

________ ____, 200___ @ __:__ o'clock a.m./p.m. at: ____________ to the constitution

and laws thereof, including section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792.


--And for every paycheck to me from the Treasurer of the United States I will insist upon

lawful money in gold and silver coin, and if not tendered in this quality of the definition of

the dollar, as pre-scribed, will see to it that an audit be done of the U.S. Mint as to why

NOT, since there is the guarantee therefrom the Federal Reserve System by their Section

16 of the Federal Reserve Act that so much gold bullion is placed on deposit per pallet of

Federal Reserve Notes monetized, to call upon so as to prevent a fiat monetary system!


--Plus I will see to it that those people who I represent and doing business with any

governmental entity have the opportunity to compel their agents to honor their oaths of

office too since all checks or orders to pay in dollars be not a mere exchange to promises

to pay by Federal Reserve Notes, and beyond the Commerce Coins in the Coinage Act of

1965 to run parallel with the constitutional coin, since there is this redemption guarantee

by Title 12 U.S. Code Section 411.

______________________________

http://landru.i-link-2.net/monques/coinageact.html

[JosephSHaas]

Update:

What used to be called "paper money" is no longer the case.  I just called http://www.crane.com/ in Dalton, MAss.achusetts and Christine there at 1-800-268-2281 told me that there is no mixture of wood to cotton, in that all of the dollars bills / Federal Reserve Notes are made out of cotton.

So much for "bragging rights" to what I thought might have been THE N.H. Tree Farmer of the year supplying #___ board feet of timber to them that goes to the Bureau of Engraving & Printing for their contract with the PRIVATE* Federal Reserve Banks A-L, A for Boston, with the regional corporate seal only on the $1.00 bills now being replaced with the "System" seal on the other higher denomination notes.

* The notes are then shipped to each of the twelve (12) regional Federal Reserve Banks, and if robbed en route, there is only "personal" property having been stolen, since the notes are NOT monetized until AFTER they leave that Regional bank on their way to the member banks in the state, at which time the serial numbers are recorded with the federal gov't along with what is supposed to be so much #___ gold bullion per pallet of notes monetized, but that my F.O.I.A. request to the U.S. Mint has resulted in them telling me to: get lost!

Thus, do we have backing for 12 USC 411 redemption, or not!? If not, then what we have is a fiat monetary system, and a breach of the contract: Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act. A "specific performance" action to file in the U.S. Court of Claims. 

I have a check from the U.S. Marshal here in New Hampshire re-endorsed over to me and I expect its payment in the const. coin as prescribed by the law, from this supposed law-enforcement outfit! Section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792** that runs parallel with that of the Commerce coin in the Coinage Act of 1965.

** = http://landru.i-link-2.net/monques/coinageact.html and applies to all gov't offices both state and federal.

Modification: typo 411.

[Kat Kanning]

http://www.newhampshirefreepress.com/NHFreePress/?q=node/197

put Jason's statement up, edited

[firecracker joe]

that was a great letter from jason and i couldnt agree more with him he and the others need to be freed on grounds of stupidity on the part of this govt and kangaroo court.

[keith in RI]

i sent ed 55 of the fair trial photo protest pictures (they can all be seen on freethebrowns.com) the only ones i removed were the ones of people holding guns as they wouldnt get in anyway, i wasnt really expecting him to get them and i was right. they returned them all to me with a note saying personal photos are limited to 25 per parcel...... thing is they paid $6.80 to mail them back to me just so i could put them into 2 different envelopes and send them back...... im glad the feds keep wasting our money.

[JosephSHaas]

"Son of Man" stopped by Concord this afternoon and we had a nice chat:

1.) The front page story with picture in his orange jump-suit, but in reduced print:

      http://www.vnews.com/08132008/08132008.htm  for "The Valley News" / Claremont

2.) A readable story with photo by M S-K for Plainfield,
     "Judge doesn't forgive his trespass":

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080813/NEWS01/808130362

JSH

[keith in RI]

i received a letter from ed today, it was in response to my package of photos to him that they denied because of the quantity. he asked me to resend it to see if they'll get through the next time. (i have to send less then 25 in each envelope) funny thing is they gave him my letter that came with it, but somehow he still hasnt gotten my letter that contained the power of attorney forms.............. apparently power of attorney forms are against their security protocols????

[JosephSHaas]

...
     "Judge doesn't forgive his trespass":

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080813/NEWS01/808130362
....

Say what? evidence.  The judge should have checked the rears of the Treasury Agents and Marshals for their hemorrhoids as proof of them being the real trespassers! against the true owner, since this "seizure" was done by militant action with force as evidence over the real evidence of the gold-sealed certificate, them being withOUT authority from the non-filing of federal papers by N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to our N.H. Office of Secretary of State as pre-scribed by the law, and "they" call themselves law-enforcement agents!? They are the real "outlaws"!

Where are their I Samuel 6:3+4 "trespass" offerings? in the tradition of The "Five Golden Emerods", K.J.V. see http://www.zianet.com/maxey/reflx135.htm where it's called a "guilt" offering, also http://www.bible-history.com/isbe/E/EMERODS/ over to The Stone of Abel at http://www.angelfire.com/fl/BriansHouse/hiddencity4.html to what? be delivered to the high point over at Ed's place? being the turret? ____

And in reference to the frog stories here in my previous replies, see also amongst this Eli story of to his son Samuel the judge who made his sons Joel and Abiah judges after him (I Sam. 8:1) but that the people did say in :6 "Give us a king to judge us" and 10:19 "set a king over us". and of how Saul became such a king.

This info here today from "Old Home Day" of being a Family Man with others of like mind, or being a Families Man in the plural of the commune variety, like in Communism over our supposed-to-be Art. IV, Sec. 4 U.S. Const. republican form of gov't. The key word: infidel, in that by I Timothy 5:8 "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel" defined as "one who has no religious beliefs". The word infidel also in 2 Corinthians 6:15 along with the word Belial that's "A title for a 'worthless person'." ["Strong's Concordance" (c)1985 @ page 57]. and cites 1 Sam 1:16, and so the rest of this Samuel story.

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas, "unable" (by religious authority) to pay that portion of my property taxes going to the schooling of others, other than those being too poor in $money at below the poverty level. The word unable defined as not able or incapable, and so with capable defined as having capacity or ability, as in the "power to perform", or "authority" as in the right and power to command, enforce laws, exact obedience, determine, influence or judge, then to "exact" the gov't to be "frugal" as our public servants do take an RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to this Article 38 in our N.H. Const. & Bill of Rights! The word frugal defined as avoiding unnecessary* expenditure of money, thrifty, useful and worthy. Expenditure of MY money! and BEFORE any such bills are paid. And so with those landowners ABOVE the poverty level, them not "needing"* our money, and so their wants just plain un-constitutional! Here's my 10% of the school tax for those too poor in money to pay, you're not going to get that other 90%! hereby deducted from my tax bills, paid in protest to avoid having to deal with ANOTHER tax sale, like I went through in 1984-88, getting up to $1,500 in $amount by Article 20 to take the Town to court for extortion and a trial by jury to award this theft to the seventh degree by Proverbs 6:30-31. This is my Art. 5 religious right! to persuade you to do likewise, of avoiding to $feed the infidels.

[JosephSHaas]

What kind of trespass was it?

The word: trespass is defined as: "To invade the property or rights of another without his consent."

But does the U.S. Gov't "own" this property? No! They merely "seized" it, and so with the "or" word, an invasion of their "rights"? No! The gov't does NOT have any rights, but mere privileges that we as the creators grant to our creature.

So to the other definition of this word: "To infringe upon the privacy* or attention of another." [The "American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, (c)1973 @ page 736 for PRIVATE* property], and so WHAT are federal agents as PUBLIC servants doing there!? Thus leading to an infringement of their "attention" or sign of to KEEP OUT.

The word "infringe" @ page 366 defined as: "To break** or ignore*** the terms or obligations of an agreement, law****, etc; violate."***** Notice the semicolon between: (1) the etc. as an abbreviation for the phrase of et cetera meaning "And other unspecified things of the same class; and so forth." (p. 246), and (2) the word: violate.

Yes, "Son of Man" did violate***** the attention sign put up by the Feds, but the sentence for the infringement is not complete without the former: Did the Feds break** the terms of an agreement?  No, they have YET to file the N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 paperwork from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. to fulfill the conditional "Consent" that our N.H. Legislature & General Court offered to them back on June 14, 1883 when they had their court of violations in Exeter and Portsmouth, then moved up to Concord and up'ted/ elevated the violations to misdemeanors and felonies. Did "they" break** or ignore*** the terms or obligations of the law?**** Yes! Then which ones? Break** or ignore***, "and" terms or obligations?

They choose to ignore the law****, but that it is still there as pre-scribed.  The Marshal took an oath to obey the const. Did he break his oath? Yes. Did he break the law? No. The law or const. is an enabling act of our founders who put it there that IF the Feds chose to do business in ANY or ALL of the 50 states of the union, they MAY do so, but don't have to, by application.  Have they applied? No. The Marshal and his "goons" that take their orders blindly from him are outlaws!  They think that they are ABOVE the law, when in fact they are outside the law.

So they have chosen to ignore what?: the terms "or" obligations? The answer is both: (1) the terms of doing business here are spelled out to have their agent file such papers under oath with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State, and; (2) the obligation is that they must get Consent first and prior or BEFORE they begin their operations.

Thus their seizure of this property is by "militant" action, with force as their evidence against the REAL evidence being the gold-sealed certificate of non-filing signed by William Gardner himself, the N.H. Secretary of State, which copy has been entered into my official complaint against William Morse, Assistant U.S. Attorney from WHERE? ________ is he licensed? Bar No. ______? as they put on their documents now, but not THEN back in Ed's case.  My complaint sitting in Washington awaiting action from them.

And as I've said, Monier has not broken the law or constitution in this part of that document, but has broken it in other areas, including the right as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to "due process of law", meaning not only substantive, but procedural, as in the end does NOT justify the means.  He is in extreme denial, or choosing to ignore the law and the legal, of both the const. and the State statute, and so is technically a sociopath needing medical attention for either his stupidity or corruptness as in evil intent, with malice thoughts to purposely or knowingly violate the Ninth Amendment too: The victims in this case entitled to the rules as prescribed by Roberts Rules of Order, in that first be the filing and THEN the actions!! What we have is a topsy-turvy situation needing correction by the circuit judges to RIDE the circuit FROM MAss. (a double-filing state in non-compliance too, see http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm ) where their headquarters are located, to reach out for the medicine in either the state of Maine or Vermont (single-filing state in compliance) withIN the circuit to eventually cure their condition of the whole.

JSH