Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 32

[JosephSHaas]

Free Reno and Other Prisoners of Conscience!  http://WorldNews.com   2009-06-26 

http://article.wn.com/view/2009/06/26/Free_Reno_and_Other_Prisoners_of_Conscience/

Article by WorldNews.com Correspondent Dallas Darling...

The federal government, in conjunction**** with state and local authorities, eventually *****arrested Reno after wrestling him to the floor and after kicking and beating him. He was ******extradited to New Hampshire to stand trial for conspiracy charges and for aiding and abetting the Browns in their standoff with federal agents.

... the federal government ignores and dishonors (the "Bill of Rights)!" said Reno...

Dallas Darling - darling@wn.com

(Note: You can write to Reno Gonzales at: El Reno, Oklahoma...El Reno Fed Corrections Institute...Reno Gonzales, P.O. Box 1000, El Reno, OK 73036)

(Dallas Darling is the author of The Other Side Of Christianity: Reflections on Faith, Politics, Spirituality, History, and Peace. He is a correspondent for http://www.worldnews.com and writes a weekly column for Iran's Javan Newspaper. You can read more of his articles at http://www.beverlydarling.com and http://wn.com/dallasdarling.) ....

Thanks Donna. And in reference to paragraph #3 the key word is "conjunction" ****, as in the federal government is LIMITED to exercise Legislation only in Washington, D.C. and "over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be".  So when that Arrest Warrant went out from the U.S. District Court in Concord, New Hampshire was it lawful?  No! The Feds have yet to file the 40USC255 papers by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution. Marshal Monier's oath is ONLY to execute "lawful precepts".  This was NOT a lawful precept! Reno was unlawfully ***** arrested!

My presumption is that the Federal Court in _________, Texas is lawful, right? http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm So WHY no opinion there when Reno was brought to there by this together-ness of the fed-state-local combination? An opinion of whether or not he was in lawful custody! Who made that state or local decision to turn him over to the feds? The individual in that state or local agency, Officer __________ of #__ ________ (Street) in the City/Town of: _________, Texas Zip Code ________ Tel. (___) _________ ought to be sued!, found guilty by jury verdict, their house liened, and sold with 1/2 the proceeds to Reno, them to down-size into a trailer, with 1/2 their income to Reno until the $2,000 per day is paid from when he was arrested and incarcerated back on Sept. __, 2007.

Plus: he was NOT technically "extradited" ****** FROM Texas TO New Hampshire, BUT merely transferred from one federal locale to another.  Who was the Federal Judge _______ in Texas who allowed this transport order to go from there to here withOUT first inquiring into the lawfulness of such precept? He ought to be impeached! Plus the Attorney ____________ assigned to Reno disbarred! WHY is there no re-action there to these goons? of the state/local officer(s), the judge and this so-called Public Defender?

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

WANTED: Two other "Freedom Fighters" to file a Joint-Claim with me at the Secretary of State's Office starting Monday for to collect $14,000 each from Gov. John H. Lynch in September for his dereliction of duty to allow us to assert our rights to attend a LAWFUL "public trial" as is supposed to be a guarantee by the Sixth and Ninth Amendments. Here are the details as outlined in my now open-letter to Beverly Darling of The "World News" dot com website:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"Thank you Beverly Darling for your report of yesterday, just read, and looking for a follow-up like for when Reno does sue that/those state/local official(s) in the county court there in Texas for a jury trial verdict of damages amounting to almost 365 x 2 years = 730 x $1,000/day at least = $730,000 x 2 = $1.46 million when figured out as for the $2,000 per day charge, as compared to the Veronica Silva case here in New Hampshire where she got $1,000/day back in the 1980s, (the story made the front pages of The http://www.unionleader.com/ ) the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 amount http://www.state.nh/us/ since increased from a max of then $25,000 to $50,000 in The State Board of Claims or more when by appeal to the jury. Her having been illegally incarcerated for 20 days (she did give her probation officer her change of address, but that he didn't put it into the system until 20 days later).  She actually got $1,250 per day, but the net of $1000/day since her Attorney Andru Volinsky (of Manchester, N.H.) got 20%= $5,000 of the $25,000, so really: $2,500/day now as double that, me rounding it off here.  So you'd think that if you can write up such a report maybe some attorney down there might like to take the case for to make $xxx,xxx.xx and give you a nice "finder's fee". (;-) Best wishes, -- Joe

Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

The hyperlink to the below as by a copy and paste being:

http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.8670 with the hyperlinks to 40USC255 within my Archives there, citing the U.S. Attorney Manual #664 too, and that 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case of 1943 thanks to Bob Schulz getting a cc: of this too.

P.S. You did mention Bob Wolffe, as taking a deal, but that deal void if found to have been entered into by the government to be false on THEIR part, and so for him to eventually sue too; also Jason Gerhard, plus Dan Riley too. cc: to his brother Bill. And Keith for Jason in contact by e-mail.

footnote: see also my Reply #____ here about my plan to sue the governor on a twice daily basis for the word prompt in our Bill of Rights (Art.14) for him not asserting his Art. 41+51 duty to enforce all legislative mandates as by the "shall" word for which he SHALL be "responsible for" my personal rights to be Art. 12 protected and right to attend a LAWFUL "public trial" by the Sixth (6th) and Ninth (9th) Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as in the Ed & Elaine Brown case starting Mon., June 29th and supposed to last about ten (10) days. Thus since I do work about 8 hrs. of a day, sleep for 8, and thus my free time of 8 hrs. (4 hrs. am + 4 hrs. p.m. to have dedicated to this case) that I could have attended this trial, that 1/3rd of $2500/day or $833/day is a very realistic figure, based on the Bible BELIEVE IT OR NOT, because as I've explained, I should be making $200/day as the average salary of a college graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree and so x 7 = $1,400/day, see Public Law 97-80 (96 Statute 1211) of Oct. 4, 1983 = The Year of the Bible for 1983 & Beyond, to Proverbs 6:30-31 to charge the thief sevenfold the $amount stolen.  And so with no filing fee for those cases of $5000 or less, me looking to conserve paper, so if your electronic website can "advertise" for others who would also like to be "patriots for profit" in a different light than that term nornally applies, then to contact me, and we can file like a kill-three-birds with one stone claim of $1,400 x 3 = $4,200 for each day of the trial starting on Monday x 10 days = $14,000 to each of us from this multi-millionaire governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton, whose house over there is assessed at: $__________ for if he does NOT pay us immediately upon a decision of the Board at their next quarterly meeting on September ___, 2009, to thus lien, and so as a proven non-jurisdiction for the Feds, our claim having been won to richochet back to help the major and minor victims of both: Ed & Elaine Brown, plus Danny, Jason, Reno and Bob.

footnote #2: I promise to give you a nice $finder's fee for publishing this, and WHEN we win our case this Fall, so that you can help others, as I've found from that http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm website, thanks to Attorney Lowell "Larry" Becraft from Huntsville, Alabama, who I've read about since the F. Tupper Saussy days of the early 1980s from Sweanee, Tennessee http://www.tuppersaussy.com with his best-selling book: "The Miracle on Main Street" about Art. I, Sec. 10 lawful money, and his "The Main Street Journal", R.I.P. that MAss.achusetts is also in violation of their statute too to their Secretary of State (and so technically the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals too), and on a visit to Florida to see my mother in 2007, I also found NO federal filing at the governor's office there; and get this: This Portland, Maine Federal Judge George Z. Singal, a refugee from Italy, supposedly naturalized in Bangor (yet to hear back from the Clinton Library in Arkansas as he appointed him, to see IF the Senate investigated his illegal status, as the statute in Maine requires the Feds to get a constitutional grant of authority first as by not a statute but an amendment to their Constitution, that has NOT been done! and so ALL of Singal's doings unlawful and illegal!)"

[JosephSHaas]

Danny Riley is listed as "In transit" on the BOP site.

It's taken an entire week (7 days) to get WHERE?

http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=Daniel&Middle=&LastName=Riley&Race=U&Sex=U&Age=&x=63&y=9

"1.      DANIEL RILEY     14528-052      41-White-M      01-22-2039      IN TRANSIT

Results 1 - 1 of 1
New Search    FAQs    Privacy"

- - Joe

P.S. In The Fed-contracted places of: Merrimack or Strafford County Jail in Boscawen or Dover respectfully? I did just call the Cheshire County Jail in Keene thinking that the Feds might also have a contract with them too, at 603: 399-7794 press 6, but that I guess not, as he is not there, just that is where State Rep. Baldasaro's brother John is, as for the state offense(s) I guess for posing as an impostor Deputy U.S. Marshal looking for counterfeits. The line to Boscawen rings #___ times withOUT an answer; to call Dover later...

http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-212398.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mod: "Yard Sale" Pit Stop; Danny NOT in Dover at "9. Strafford County House of Corrections, Dover, NH. (603) 742-3310" as I did just call there; therefore to re-call Boscawen* at ___:____ o'clock p.m.

* Maybe that's the old jail #?  http://www4.egov.nh.gov/Inmate_Locator/       **    to    http://www4.egov.nh.gov/Inmate_Locator/Default.aspx    for Riley, Dan =

"Inmate Locator   Search RSAs
No Inmates match your entries
If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions about the website please click here. ____ If you find any technical problems with this website please click here ____"

** This exact website found over from: http://publicrecords.onlinesearches.com/NH_Merrimack.htm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bottom Line: Dan is at The Merrimack County Dept. of Corrections, 314 Daniel Webster Highway, Concord, N.H. 03303 Tel. 603: 796-3600

Bill: If Danny would like to put me down on his visiting list, to TRY to get in to see him, to see if Merrimack County is a lot better than those jerks over in Dover for Strafford County (I've "yet" to contest the Fed-County Contract with them in Boscawen,  , that, like I've written before, is NOT with the County Commissioners, but on file with Super. White there in Boscawen, and yet to read a copy, and so like yes: I would like to, as they say, kill two birds with one stone, having visited Bob there last) , would you please have him process my name, address and phone # that you and he already has, or to give again to him when he might next call to you.  It takes 5 to 7 days to process, and so if in on Monday, June 29th, then maybe to be able to see him by the end of next week on Saturday (2 visitors allowed per week? for up to 2 hrs. each?) Maybe THEN, if allowed with pen and paper, Gary and I could BOTH get to see Dan to work on that UCC stuff, to call Bernie for Gary in a few minutes for his address too, and contact phone # through Bernie, if he'd like to work on this project.  Best wishes, -- Joe

[Kat Kanning]

Bottom Line: Dan is at The Merrimack County Dept. of Corrections, 314 Daniel Webster Highway, Concord, N.H. 03303 Tel. 603: 796-3600

That should be Boscawen,  not Concord. 

[DonnaVanMeter]

http://www.redcrayons.net/browndocket09.htm

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.redcrayons.net/browndocket09.htm

More 18USC3232 illegal hearings in Portland, Maine I see after the documents #25 + 30 of:

1.) "03/09/2009
   
NOTICE OF HEARING as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown: Status Conference set for 3/11/2009 09:00 AM before Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine, Courtroom #1. Counsel for the Government and both pro-se defendants shall appear in-person. Standby counsel may appear telephonically.(dae) (Entered: 03/09/2009)"; and;

2.) "03/11/2009
   
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine: STATUS CONFERENCE as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown held on 3/11/2009. Government is to file a written response one week from this Friday at noon to the Defendants Motion to Prepare and Defend contained in pleading no. 26. Court to issue a New Scheduling Order. Defendants remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal. (Court Reporter: L. Dunbar) (Govt Atty: Arnold Huftalen, Terry Ollila) (Defts Atty: Bjorn Lange, Michael Iacopino participated telephonically,) (Defts: Elaine Brown, Edward Brown)(Total Hearing Time: 41 minutes) (dae) (Entered: 03/11/2009)"

cc: both my Fed. Rep. Paul Hodes and U.S. Senator Judd Gregg, to order that they return the money to  Howard to return to Congress that was spent illegally (Judge Jeffrey R. Howard checks #_____ + _______ plus #______ + _______ for $_______ + $______ plus $______ + $_______ respectfully to both defense attorneys. ) and impeach this/these judges who granted and allowed this theft, being also Judge George Z. Singal.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

The end does NOT justify the means.  Procedural "due process" of law has been broken, and so the oaths of these judges to the 5th + 14 Amendments have been violated.  They must be punished by impeachment BEFORE this criminal case #30 can continue!

[JosephSHaas]

The latest from Margo over at http://www.concordmonitor.com/ and to be exact:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090629/FRONTPAGE/906290303

with my Reply there, to now type up my First Draft Claim here in a few minutes:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mod:

*WHO    **WHAT  ***WHEN  ****WHERE  *****WHY  ******HOW

To: The N.H. RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims

NOW COMES the Complainant, Joseph S. Haas and claims that Gov. John H. Lynch* of Hopkinton (business address: 107 North Main Street, The Capitol Building, 2nd floor NW corner office, Concord, N.H. 03301, 603: 271-2121) owes me: $_________ based upon the following for which a decision is requested at your next quarterly meeting on September ___, 2009 for him to "prompt"ly pay or have his house and paychecks subject to the Writ of Elegit process:

Ever since he was first notified, on June 21, 2007***, at 4:29 o'clock p.m. + at the State House**** by my delivery of the Art. 49 Petition to his receptionist, of the wrongs being committed by the federal failure to file, as in their technical trespass [ * ] onto state and private soil, for which we deserve our Art. 12 protection by the N.H. Bill of Rights, he has done a lousy job at NO Art. 41 + 51, Part 2 N.H. Constitution enforcement** (omission rather than commission)  of the RSA Ch. 123:1 legislative mandate to have WHOever that federal officer is supposed to be, to have to file their 40USC255 papers with our N.H. Secretary of State's Office, from 1-8-17 of the U.S. Constitution, and as per U.S. Attorney Manual #664 and that 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case as indicated already in my Claim #2009-013 that was actually filed on October 15, 2008. The offer of June 14, 1883 not as a gift but for an exchange as this was and still is a conditional offer, yet having been accepted! Thus there being no jurisdictional authority over there.

Not only a trespass [ * ] but a taking of both: (1) the person and the real and personal property of both my friends: Ed & Elaine Brown of 401 Center of Town Road, in Plainfield, Sullivan County, N.H. [also of Elaine's Dental Office Building in Lebanon, Grafton County, N.H.], currently having to defend themselves on federal soil, in case #2009-30 as having been forced to there by some local-county-state-federal compact that is against the law! and their RSA Ch. 92:2 oaths of office, the local oaths as subscribed in accordance with RSA Ch. 42:1. And (2) my liberty of the right to attend this, what is supposed to be, a LAWFUL "public trial" by the Sixth (6th) and Ninth (9th) Amendments to the United States Constitution. See a photocopy of the computer printout of my Reply #8676 from The N.H. Underground of this past Saturday, 6/27 @ 9:18 AM, and my 11:18 AM e-mail to Beverly Darling, nicknamed "Dallas" who did reply of "to keep this issue 'alive' in the news" of 9:50 AM this morning.

I do not voluntarily attend any more unlawful nor illegal hearings in federal court, [for to prevent further outlaw activities by the judge in possibly issuing contempt citations against me for more Freedom of Speech, which I've already proven there that they have no respect for my "Free Commercial Speech" re: my Champerty appeal, to revise when that court does finally become lawful!] but would have liked to be attending Ed's trial, and so withOUT the filing as the governor owes me this personal service for which he is responsible for, my rights having been personally damaged as stolen from me this morning, and are/have being/been stolen from me this afternoon, I do charge him with payment to me by this bill for $1,400 as indicated, + 2,800 representing the rest of the day = at least $4,200.  The "rest of the day" being of the 8x2=16 hours deducted from the sub-total of doing my homework to have tried to prevent this from happening, being over 23 days logged in over at The New Hampshire Underground x 24 hours per day = 552 hours - 16 = 536 hours credit remaining.

The reason for why***** he has failed being possibly him too greedy on-the-lookout for more federal funds, and so him like that lap-dog our "Founding Fathers" warned us about, telling him that if you love wealth more than you do liberty (for yourself and/or your master, as our public "servant" who is actually a non-servant by his omission here), that you get down on your knees and lick the hand that feeds you, you LAZY bastard is HOW you are non-dealing with this situation!  Shame on you! An utter disgrace to the human race! Him oblivious to Art. 95 N.H. in that we are supposed to have #__ state collectors of both the state and federal taxes, as by both the Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 1 uniform taxes and the Sixteenth (16th) Amendment un-uniform taxes from 1913 plus, to prevent a trim "Uncle Sam" from getting bloated as beyond the LIMITations of the Federal government! A "check-and-balance" too of the creator over what we have created!

So for the ten (10) trial days anticipated, you will be getting nine (9) more of these bills, unless you AT LEAST "try" to have the Feds comply with the law, by writing them a letter, like to the GSA/ General Reserves Administration officer there (Mr. Reddig, 1st floor Cleveland Building at 53 Pleasant Street) who is the landlord to this Art. III, Section 1 "inferior court" of Congress, at The Warren B. Rudman Building at 55 Pleasant Street, and so a copy of this also being delivered to both: Fed. Rep. Paul Hodes, and U.S. Senator Judd Gregg, at their North Maine Street offices here in Concord to please notify your Respondeat Superiors: both the House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and Senate President/ V.P. Joe Biden that if "they" won't correct this, that the House will start impeachment actions against all judges involved: to wit: Stephen McAuliffe, George Z. Singal and Jeffrey R. Howard, of the First Circuit, our former N.H. Attorney General who dished out these illegal 18USC3232 checks for transport orders over to Portland, Maine. And with a copy of this to the Chief Executive Officer, President Barack Obama for a Presidental Pardon or Commutation of Sentence for Ed & Elaine Brown, plus: Daniel-John: Riley, Cirino Gonzales, Jason Gerhard, and Robert A. Wolffe.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

cc: Claire Ebel, The N.H. Chapter of the A.C.L.U., American Civil Liberties Union, at 18 Lowe Ave,., Concord, for maybe more people from her office to likewise complain that they too would like to attend the "public trial", but not when there's a maniac behind the wheel, or on the bench of this Kangaroo Court.

[Kat Kanning]

Feh on Margot for the "motley crew" comment.

[TackleTheWorld]

I'll be testifying for Ed on Thursday July 2.
9 AM
Fed court house
33 Pleasant St
Concord

[LordBaltimore]

I'll be testifying for Ed on Thursday July 2.
9 AM
Fed court house
33 Pleasant St
Concord

The prosecution's case is only going to take two days?

[Dave Ridley]

i'm planning to be there to cover one day of the trial, it may be part of tomorrow or I might be there on wed.   I hope a decent number of others can attend too....whatever ed's faults I don't think elaine should be blamed for them and ignored to this extent.

[Jim Johnson]

i'm planning to be there to cover one day of the trial, it may be part of tomorrow or I might be there on wed.   I hope a decent number of others can attend too....whatever ed's faults I don't think elaine should be blamed for them and ignored to this extent.

Thursday... we will be there Thursday.  9:00am

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the latest from Margot over at:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090630/NEWS01/906300328

And of my recenrt Comment there on the copy and paste:

"Nancy Pelosi to visit N.H. with the RSA Ch. 123:1 papers.
New By JosephSHaas on Tue, 06/30/2009 - 13:49

Margot:

Reference your:

1.) paragraph #2 "the court was able to"

2.) paragraph #5 "the couple were arrested"

3.) paragraph #6 the "mandatory".

Why don't you tell your readers the truth? The court was NOT "able" to file the "mandatory" papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State as REQUIRED by the SHALL word in RSA Ch. 123:1 because they have FAILED to comply with their own 40USC255 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution.

And you expect us to have respect for this federal government Art. III, Sec. 1 "inferior" court (headed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate President/V.P. Joe Biden) that insists on dishing out more U.S. Codes against us from Title 18 when we have NEVER "consent"ed to same, as there has NEVER been this filing! Call it Never-Never land over there.

Instead, the Feds arrested Ed & Elaine, but how? By unlawful and illegal means! The end does NOT justify the means! in what is supposed to be procedural due process of law by the 5th + 14 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Instead we have RSA Ch. 92:2 and RSA 42:1 traitors at both the state/county and local levels of state government in cahoots with their federal criminals who are the real outlaws!

Show me WHERE we gave the feds our Art. 12 consent. It does NOT exist. And then to dis-allow an Art. 10 revolt!? Shame on you governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton. Your duty to enforce the law by Articles 41+51 is an omission, that I for one, am not satisfied with, and have and will be suing you for more damages in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims. You have denied me my right to attend a LAWFUL "public trial". You step on my ancestors' graves who fought for this country! Shame of you, SHAME on you indeed! You trample on the 6th and 9th Amendment. You deserve to be Art. 17 impeached with an Art. 38 trial in the Senate presided over by the Chief Justice in accordance with Article 40.

It's time to end this "Kangaroo Court". I did just write* and call** Pelosi's office to pull the plug. No more funding. They're running out of gas money. Same goes for the current U.S. Attorney and U.S. Marshal. Charge them under the filing by the new guard of violating 18USC242. A counter-charge against the current case #2009-30 right?

-* http://www.speaker.gov/contact/ You are hereby directed to file your 40USC255 papers with our N.H. Secretary of State as required by the "shall" word in RSA Ch. 123:1, and until done, to halt your unlawful and illegal Art. III, Sec. 1 "inferior court" of Congress from hurting my friends Ed & Elaine Brown in case #2009-30 there against them.

** 202: 225-0100 Attn: Jeff, who said to also send the above by a copy and paste to the e-mail address of AmericanVoices at mail dot house dot gov that was just sent to there for action at exactly 1:37 o'clock p.m. Now to see how long it takes before she does visit New Hampshire to straighten this out. ______"

[JosephSHaas]

"Outburst Delays Start Of Browns' Trial
Ed Brown Says He Objects To Lawyer

POSTED: 12:23 pm EDT June 30, 2009
UPDATED: 5:45 pm EDT June 30, 2009"

http://www.wmur.com/news/19904146/detail.html

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the latest from Margot over at:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090630/NEWS01/906300328    ....

Comment #2 on this same article:

"The "Fantasy World" of Gov't "George Orwell" 1984 Liars!
New By JosephSHaas on Wed, 07/01/2009 - 00:23

"Sister" tribats, where doooooo you come up with calling them "living in their fantasy world"?

If it's that Jesuit/Masonic stuff, well, yeah, like what Aaron says over at http://www.masonicinfo.com/edbrown.htm for his "Connecticut Valley Spectator" of June 5, 2003 by Aaron Nobel, Editor of these diametrically opposed groups, see http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/diametrically for "Exactly opposite; contrary."

But if you agree with Aaron on that "with a zero grasp of reality" (next to last paragraph), last "Updated 20 June 2009" that "Brown, who asserts that the federal government has no jurisdiction in New Hampshire". well join the Aaron Nobel barrel of no-see-um monkeys! Or the see-um, but keep your mouth shut to that and smear Brown because your boss says so groupee.

Hey, I know Ed can be arrogant at times, but that is Ed. If we were all the same, wouldn't this world be a dull place? It's either his way or the highway.

As in the "Highway Hotel" where Martin J. "Red" Beckman was there in the 1980s, selling his "The I.R.S. and The Black-Robed Mafia" books, is his description of these judges, and I go ONE STEP BEYOND that to the crooks in Congress who KNOW what's going on here is illegal, but don't do a damn thing about it! Their Art. III, Section 1 "inferior courts".

That's Hodes and his buddies of the Bar like Iacopino*, who is supposed to be a stand-by counsel as NOT to "represent" Ed, and so it looks like they're giving him the shaft alright, all the way to the crowbar motel for good!

And you and your ilk put up with this? Shame on you, SHAME on you indeed!

JSH

* See this same GOOGLE page #1 http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Ed+Brown%22+June+2009+%22New+Hampshire... for the words: "Ed Brown" June 2009 "New Hampshire" is HOW I found this "Spectator" Report AND the latest WMUR TV Channel 9 Report, over at: http://www.wmur.com/news/19904146/detail.html **

** See comment at page 2 of 4: "The is a nut job plain and simple. anyone who agrees with them that they don't have to pay taxes doesn't have both oars in the water as well." Try reading the definition of to "lay and collect" in the 16th Amendment; the word lay can mean either to apply or impose. If the latter, then to levy or collect. Do you think "they" meant to collect and collect? That's George Orwellian "1984" "Doublespeak"! It's apply as in request, of a "voluntary" contribution to which I say: Request Denied! (;-) And KNOW that there is NO Section 2 enforcement clause, NOR any Art. 12 "Consent" to 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution and N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 because there is no 40USC255 federal filing. So "wake up"! out of YOUR fantasy world of going down the definition of the word "they" want you to go down. Stop being a "Sheeple". Or do you want to be? That doesn't give you the right to force this on others!"