Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 32

[JosephSHaas]

Here's another copy and paste from:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090703/FRONTPAGE/907030356

entitled: "Have these "team members" of position met the required standard?"

"Margot, come on, why do I have to be like "Paul Harvey" and give the readers here "The Rest of The Story"? You should do this, it's your job, isn't it?

WHERE did these "special operat"ors "FOR the U.S. Marshals Service" under the command of  David Robertson come from"? (emphasis ADDed for not "of", but "for" as to what? Imply that they were not members of The "Service" but to assist them from some other unnamed branch of the federal government?)  Either way they came from The Air Force National Guard property at: 10 Benning St Ste 6, West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402 Tel. (603) 298-6587 http://www.manta.com/company/mmcnq6b  See map at: http://www.manta.com/maps?id=ng3nh [ * ]

So the federal government owns that property at Map #__, Lot #__ right? By deed. of 19___ And the Adjutant General is it's chief, right? Re: Article 46, Part 2, N.H. Constitution http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html who is "nominated and appointed by the governor and council" and takes the RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office, right? http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm No wonder Kenneth Clark, Retired now AFTER this incident refused to talk with me last year on his base behind WENDY"S on The Heights in Concord. He's a double-agent!

"Ver are yer paypas" General? Your 40USC255 papers that are supposed to be on file with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the "shall" word in RSA Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution of which "Consent" was offered to your federal outfit on June 14, 1883 but that was conditional as not a gift but for an exchange! http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 and * Even the U.S. Attorney KNOWS this by his Manual #664 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm but does otherwise!

* = See also: The 1943 case as cited by Bob Schulz over at: http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm of: ""In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."

So the State Police from Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire were there as "back-up" eh? Back up for what? If Ed started shooting rounds of ammunition into the bodies of Feds then to "protect" the Feds? Read Article 12 of our Bill of Rights http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html "Nor are the inhabitants of this state CONTROLLABLE**  by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." (emphasis ADDed for this word.)

Did any of these defense attorneys ask this "commander" Robertson WHERE he got his "authority" from? Did they on the first day of trial even ask Monier for a copy of his oath of office and ask him what it meant to execute only "lawful precepts" in line #__ thereof?  Is Ed going down a funnel to hell or what!?

The word control** means "To exercise a regulating influence over; direct". It is a power to dominate. WHEN, if ever, did we give the Feds the power, capacity, role or position***to have dominion over us?

*** You write that "team members positioned" themselves "in the woods", but was this an appropriate place for them on PRIVATE soil? Was it proper? In their eyes: yes, as the decorous of their dress, but that what is within them stinks to high heaven! They have FAILed to meet the "requisite standard"! And their partners in crime are the Lebanon P.D. who received them for which they provided none of this Art. 12 protection to those who had paid for this protection by the payment of their property taxes there too.

I did mention this to the City Council that night of June 6, 2007 not knowing that this break-in that afternoon had already occurred, the "team" of federal agents having been under-cover then, and by pre or post-alert to the Lebanon Police? of like if pre, of not to arrest them, or post, of they had badges to prove who they were if caught as burglars by some on-duty local COP? Either way: The Adj. Gen. to answer!"

[ * ] Modification for the: map.

[JosephSHaas]

Check this out:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090703/NEWS01/907030352&template=single

entitled: "Turn up the heat on this Cimicidea Family* & Corruption."

"I.) * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedbug

Wow! This must be costing a $ fortune! Reference the: "For now, the organizations are collecting donations of new mattresses" in paragraph #10

Check this out, just found by me at http://www.google.com/

http://www.cleanmachine.net.au/steam_cleaners_bed_bugs.html

and in particular the very last paragraph of: "It is often promulgated that bed bugs can be killed via heat by placing infested materials into black plastic bags and then into the sun. However, this has never been fully scientifically investigated".

Is there such a bed-sized black plastic bag?

Are there any motels that have or might be interested in doing this experiment, like to their parking lot some nice hot sunny day, and monitor what happens? According to this report over at: http://studenttravel.about.com/od/healthystudentholidays/a/bedbugs_5.htm "they can live more than a year without eating" and "the bugs are okay with freezing to Fahrenheit 113" plus "in hot desert areas, folks with infestations often hang bedding and clothes in the blistering sun -- remember that temps over 113 kill bed bugs." So to #___ degrees in a black plastic bag? kills the eggs too, right?

The UNH at Manchester Microbiology lab to the rescue? http://unhm.unh.edu/

Good luck Ndayavugwi, from Burundi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burundi ...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

II.) ...Where can I try some of this Burundi coffee?, as from these coffee beans grown along the Nile River there? Check out that "2006 to Present" section, and paragraph #3 of 6 about some Truth Commission over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_and_Reconciliation_Commission Notice for the United States footnotes #11-14 of:

"# Kenneth Brady outlines a potential U.S. Truth and Reconciliation Commission in his movie The Time Is Now**, and examines human rights abuses resulting from U.S. foreign policy actions taken over the last 40 years.[11]**
# There have been calls in the U.S., led by Senator Patrick Leahy and Representative John Conyers, for a 'truth commission' to investigate, but not prosecute, alleged crimes of the Bush administration.[12][13][14]"

**     http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0847199/ click on the Plot / Full Summary gets over to:                                   

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0847199/plotsummary
"The Time is Now sheds light on episodes of American Foreign*** policy that link our government to War Crimes, and the arming and training of terrorists, both at home and abroad. And it connects these horrors to each of us, with an intimacy, that is both comforting and at the same time unsettling."

*** To which I add that of not only foreign policy, but domestic policy that has somehow over-ridden the very constitution that our state of New Hampshire public servants have taken an oath to obey! The result: victims of federal aggression that needs to be checked by such a New Hampshire Truth Commission, since my Article 32 Petition went House Rule 36 unsigned by ANY member of the State-Federal Relations committee! Not all of them there that day I did visit and had then Chairman Roberts from Keene investigate, but him, for some reason, just too lazy in NOT wanting the House Speaker to assign more duties to him under House Rule 4, for which he only gets paid $100.oo per year. And so maybe the new Chairman? I did write to him too, with same result, of to contact MY Rep who says to see the Subject-matter Rep., and so the Royal Run-Around as they say!"

[JosephSHaas]

Here we go again:

http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/83279/64024

entitled: "The "Truth Commission" to oust these outlaws!"

"Thank you webnick.  I had met J.J. before there on federal turf and over at Reme's Restaurant across Pleasant Street, and find this July 2 report by her "very" interesting! Especially of this "Special Operations Group" (SOG) http://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/ops.htm out of "Tactical Operations Division" with their "small, full-time operational cadre stationed at the Marshals Service Tactical Operations Center at Camp Beauregard, LA." http://www.la.ngb.army.mil/ map at: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Camp%20Beauregard&state=LA

Now we're getting somewhere, because: "The division serves as the primary point of contact between the Office of the Director and the districts,".

So who is this Director? because: "Whenever the Marshals Service's director authorizes* a special assignment or
special security mission, it is the Tactical Operations Division that carries out those orders."

And as I've explained above, by what authority?* By what power was he given to command or "enforce laws" of the United States by Code upon the inhabitants of this sovereign state?

I repeat: UPON THE INHABITANTS OF THIS STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!

There is none, and his name is: Mudd! Actually: John F. Clark*  http://www.usmarshals.gov/contacts/clark.htm  So too to that of the "judge" with no authority to judge or preside over the rehashing of these unlawful and illegal maneuvers of these federal militants! The order is to preserve "the rule of law"! This is a dis-order! This team is out of order!  They are the outlaws!

* 202: 307-9100 http://www.usmarshals.gov/contacts/index.html

to call The Tactical Operations: W. Snelson, Assistant Director    1-800-336-0102 on Monday to get a copy of this Order #_______ of the Director,

and/or by way of the FOIA Office at http://www.usmarshals.gov/foia/index.html
on Monday: FOIA/PA Officer, Office of General Counsel, Department of Justice
U.S. Marshals Service, Washington, DC 20530-1000, (202) 307-9054. E-mail: usms.foia at usdoj.gov

Plus:  Management Support, D. Donovan, Assistant Director, 202-353-2866 +/or
Courthouse Management B. Mayles, Chief    202-353-8767 to have the Director or Chief here inquire as to WHO in or out of their office is supposed to be the 40USC255 filer to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution.

The filer I thought was the GSA/ General Services Administration landlord, but now I guess it's this Manager?  Because the word manage is to direct, control or handle, as in to administer or regulate, make the federal prisoners there withIN their space withIN the building submissive, for EVERYbody "To get along", as in association or together WITH the New Hampshire Secretary of State, the Art. 67 constitutional officer http://www.nh.gov/constitution/secretary.html who keeps the recorded RSA Ch. 92:2 oaths of office of the Agency Heads, like that of the statutory Commissioner of the Dept. of Safety who is OVER The head of the State Police.

So as they say: "Heads will roll" when these oath violators in both the state and federal governments account for this mis and mal-deeds KNOWING that what they did was unlawful and illegal, and so to prosecute them for violation of 18 USC 242 with the new U.S. Attorney, or to form some Truth Commission? See my Archives here for my last post about this. "

[JosephSHaas]

The never-ending:

at: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/83279/64042

entitled: "Judges are taught a lesson by other judges on the collateral."

"Ray, I hear what you're saying of calling this an "Administrative Contract Court" because until the Congress does "ordain* and establish" these "inferior Courts" by Article III, Section I of the United States Constitution, there can be no "judicial Power of the United States" within this Art. I, Section 8, Clause 17 "Place" UNTIL that* happens.

The that* being to have been ordained, and so to see that word as highlighted over at http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html gets to: http://www.usconstitution.net/glossary.html#ORDAIN for the quote of: "Ordain
ordain v. 2. To order by or as if by decree. [<Lat. ordinaire, to organize] Source: AHD"

So in other words Congress did "establish" as in "To cause to be RE-cognized and accepted" BY us inhabitants of the state of New Hampshire, (emphasis ADDed), but when was it ever first ordained as to be at first cognized, so that we could re-congize? Or in other words: WHEN did they/ the Feds ever first ACCEPT our offer of conditional consent?  NEVER! They have FAILed to provide the 40USC255 papers as required by the "shall" word in our N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1.

Thus, from what you did write in your paragraph #1: we are seeing it unfold right now before our very eyes: THIS judge is in contempt of case-laws, re: both the Hagens case 15US533 and the Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 case of (1980), for NOT providing the proof of jurisdictional authority, as the burden of proof is upon the court. There might be a sanction of sentence imposed by him, contrary to the Standard v. Olsen case 74Sup.Ct.768.  But that: ""Where there is absence of jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings are a nullity and confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no justification, and may be rejected upon direct collateral attack."
Thompson v. Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L.Ed. 381; Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3L. Ed. 471." And as I've indicated here in my Archives or over at the New Hampshire Underground, by the Title ___ U.S. Code Section ____, you've got to file a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to the SAME court that sentenced you, for a different judge, and if he or she is also corrupt, THEN you're allowed by Rule 63 I think it is, of The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (found by Reno), to THEN file at the U.S. District Court of WHERE you're physically located in that F.C.I./ Federal "Correctional" Facility, where YOU are the teacher to them as the students being corrected, to send them a bill of $x,xxx,xxx.xx for your teaching later. (;-) "

[JosephSHaas]

To: The Office of Bar Counsel
Board on Professional Responsibility
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
515 5th Street NW
Building A, Suite 117
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 638-1501 ....

Update: The original signed complaint (with attachments) was mailed to this D.C. Board by me yesterday from Concord. - Joe cc: to Ed & Elaine too for the P.O. to deliver to there on Monday for them to get on Tuesday.

[JosephSHaas]

While checking out the sniper Edward Recor at GOOGLE, I found the WBZ report of this AP article that Jack Blood has too, and since Jack has a comment page, I thought I'd leave my 2-cents there too.  Here's a copy and paste:

over at: http://deadlinelive.info/2009/07/02/agent-nh-tax-evader-was-in-his-crosshairs/

"Thanks Jack, and also WBZ-TV out of Boston for the 'eye" Team they call it as they video-tape crooks like COPs stuffing the trunks of their cruisers, while on-duty, with booze on illegal pay-offs. I saw this on their Channel 4 years ago.

BTW speaking of pay-offs, who paid off U.S. Marshals Service Director John F. Clark to look the other way, or is he a total dunce? as in either ignorant or corrupt? http://www.usmarshals.gov/contacts/clark.htm

And what of his boy here: Edward Recor, is he playing the Sergeant Schultz routine too? like from that actor in the 1960s TV series comedy of WWII called: "Hogan's Heroes".

What I mean is that over at http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special14/articles/0407coldcase0407.html for that "Oddball lawyer" case of April 7, 2006 they have him down as not only this sniper but an "Investigator".

You would have thought that BEFORE he goes on a mission he'd check-it-out, as to see IF it is legal or lawful or not.  Especially when N.H. Marshal Monier's own oath of office is to execute ONLY "lawful precepts".

Did Recor ever check it out of under who he was dealing with? Or did he take his orders blindly from his boss, Director Clark and so to hell with the means, as long as the end of the order be that he deliver the man to the concrete slab either dead or alive.

Say what? You mean we've got goons running, or I should say: ruining our government!?

Here's what I'd like to see, after meeting with Recor and his buddies at "The Barley House" Thursday night when Chief Deputy Gary DiMartino, brought the boys over for a beer: He "investigates" to find out that he was set up. Set up to do an illegal maneuver and so files charges of fraud against his boss under The Whistle-blower Act to collect his percentage of the tens of thousands of dollars for the illegal shipment of federal inmates from New Hampshire over to Maine in violation of the law: Title 18 U.S. Code Section 3232.

Then maybe Vermont U.S. Senator Patrick Lahey forms another "Truth Commission" to investigate the non-investigator Director Clark for sending his boys into an illegal operation, maybe not done mal-iciously, but by mis-take, that either way ought to earn all these #__ two-man teams a Bonus this year 2009 as The Year of The Truth.

The truth being that there has been no 40USC255 filing to N.H.'s RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution, as required by that 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case, in that a June 14, 1883 offer was given to the Feds, but not as a gift, but for this conditional exchange that has yet to happen by some GSA agent or whoever even my Fed Rep. and U.S. Senator don't know, or prefer not to know whose job responsibility this is at the federal level, or by the N.H. governor under his Articles 41 + 51 duties "to execute the laws of the state AND of the United States" (emphasis ADDED, and for that phrase of: "responsible for" that makes him personally liable for his failure to act by this omission to NOT Article 12 protect us inhabitants here from "any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent.") The U.S. Attorney KMOWS this too, by his Manual #664, but prefers to be one of the no-see-um monkeys.

Stay tuned for WHEN I win my RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims case #2009-013 complaint against Millionaire Governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton on September __, 2009 (they meet quarterly), to ricochet to December when Ed & Elaine Brown plus The Freedom Four do benefit too.

Best wishes for those "Happy Trails", -- Joe"

The exact page = http://deadlinelive.info/2009/07/02/agent-nh-tax-evader-was-in-his-crosshairs/comment-page-1/#comment-343

[John Edward Mercier]

Which property are you claiming they 'purchased'?

[JosephSHaas]

Which property are you claiming they 'purchased'?

Which Reply #____ are you referring to?

Originally I had thought that some Fed for ALL the properties in New Hampshire bought by the Feds is supposed to file this 40USC255 paper with the S of S by RSA 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const., but now think that maybe if not even the landlord GSA in Boston for the N.E. Region, nor each particular landlord, like for the court(s) district and circuit/ attorney(s) at Pleasant Street and U.S. Marshals there too plus the BATF&E in Manchester, etc. then maybe the manager of each? as the tenant has to file?  The bottom line being that the governor by his Art. 51 duty is to enforce all state AND national law for which he shall be "responsible for" by Art. 41, but that ONLY the U.S. Code applicable upon us, the state inhabitants either by freedom of choice OR by being dragged to here, AFTER the filing that has NEVER taken place by our blanket or general offer of "Consent" that was not given as a gift on June 14, 1883 but for that exchange, as explained in that 1943 case, that back and/or before the Feds were dealing only in violations at their musical courts in Exeter and Portsmouth before moving to Concord, and now into felonies that means serious business, and so looking to see that all i's are dotted and t's crossed for EVERY minute detail to be performed, because when jurisdiction is challenged it MUST be proven by the party prosecuting, the burden of proof is upon Coluntuono & Company, even by his own U.S. Attorney Manuel #664, and us insisting that our right as an inhabitant have the Art. 12 guarantee or else:

Or else to sue the one "responsible for" allowing the creature/parasite U.S. to go after the creator and guests withOUT authority! I've already sued the governor in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims and to sue for that $5,000 more per day for this past week of Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday + Thursday = $5,000 x 4 = $20,000 in four separate billings on this Monday, July 6th plus since this is supposedly an Art. III, Section 1 "inferior court" headed by Congress, with its heads being The House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi and Senate President/V.P. Joe Biden, to send them bills for same, backdating Pelosi's to when I first contacted her office by telephone at just before the 1:29 p.m. "Contact" that was "Submit"ed from her website AND e-mail to her office worker Jeff for her at 1:37 p.m. last Tuesday, and so her to pay this 1/2 of Tue., Wed. + Thu. of: $12,500 more. But read my reply to Raymond at the http://www.concordmonitor.com of maybe this is ONLY some contract court UNTIL it is both ordained AND established.  Anyway with them pretending to be a lawful court, that's fraud, and so with Jeff saying to get faster action to see my M.O.C.'s (Members of Congress), thus having already contacted Fed. Reps. Shea-Porter AND Hodes (from where I live and work) PLUS Sen. Gregg to see to it that this unlawful and illegal-ness stop, and to return the $money to the Feds that was spent illegally for transports over to Maine, and telling Susan Collins' office too by e-mail and phone last year, reference 18USC3232, then to branch out to include new N.H. U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, plus MAine U.S. Senator Olympia Snow on Monday too, plus whichever Federal Rep. of either Chellie Pingree or Mike Michaud covers for the U.S. Courthouse in Portland, Maine, see http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi-bin/newseek.cgi?site=ctc&state=me

So does this mean that the $5000 per day is divided up by each element having to pay $x,xxx instead?  I don't car how much each pays, just that maybe one of threse block-heads will get it through their thick skull and at least TRY to find out that somebody is ultimately "responsible for" this fiasco! Plus to impeach Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe) Burling, Retired Grafton County Superior Court judge who violated her RSA Ch. 92:2 oath by allowing the Feds as defendants in her court to push the case over to them by "Removal" per some U.S. Code that has NEVER been accepted by us per Article 12 when Ed filed his case there, and those thieving N.H. Supreme Court judges on Danny's case (also that Strafford County Superior Court Judge Steven Houran, former A.A.G. in Dover who never gave him a hearing on his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, as required by the "complete" word to read AND hear by Art. 14); to impeach by Art. 17 for an Art. 38 trial in the Senate. A copy of this going to the Chair and Vice Chair of the Legislator's Council for the Petition for Redress of Grievance, who next meet in Room 207 L.O.B. at 12 o'clock high noon re-starting in September (after their 2 month Summer vacation), to process this Article 32 Petition for Impeachment, as endorsed with their signatures of sponsor and co-sponsor(s) by House Rule 36 with their District (not Seat) #, so that it can get an LSR from Legislative Services this Fall, to be given a Bill # for a hearing in the appropriate committee by House Rule 4 onto a full vote in the House to impeach ALL of them! 4 currently sitting, and that Galway, retired to eliminate his and their Art. 36 retirements too!

Yours truly, Joe Haas, "Sovereign Citizen" 

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste of my e-mail of exactly 12:05 PM this afternoon:

"@#$%^&*             HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY!             @#$%^&*

Re: "To impeach 4+1= 5 Supremes + 4=Houran, Burling + Kelly plus: Cirone. = 9 **"

To: Paul and Dan, Chair & Vice Chairman, plus Member Alfred:

Would you please forward this onto the others in your group of about 12 = one dozen for to start the Impeachment of ALL 4 + 1 = 5 Supreme Court Judges (the 1 meaning Galway, retired), plus that crooked judge in Dover, and Judge Ed Kelly in Concord (per my previous e-mail wherein he's using the dissenting opinion of Joe Nadeau in his case law minor against the majors BELIEVE IT OR NOT!) and please schedule me in to talk about this on September __, 2009 toward that LSRs) onto House Bills for hearing(s) and trial(s) this next Winter 2009-2010.

Thank you, - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas*, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) e-mail, also at JosephSHaas at hotmail.com (without the Jr.)

cc: Retired N.H. State Trooper plus State Rep. and my friend Dick Marple, of Hooksett. - - P.S. I forgot to mention another RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 claim to the State Board of Claims also against the N.H. Commissioner of Safety over the State Police for their FAILure to serve and Art. 12 "protect" too! as previously notified also.

footnote: also Judge Cirone in Lebanon District Court for stealing my right of appeal to the Superior Court for an Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 3 trial by jury in my "Wise Up or Die" case of a Class B misdemeanor.

* Founding member of V.O.C.A.L.S., Inc. [ Victims of a Corrupt American Legal System ] to re-incorporate every year ending in a zero, so to amend to maybe: Victors of a Corrected American Legal System? (;-)

** footnote #2: to also look into the unlawful payments to the widows of Judges Smith & Johnson, (Peter W. and William R. resp. of Littleton and Hanover) since Art. 36 specifically reads that of only for ACTUAL services performed!"

[JosephSHaas]

Which property are you claiming they 'purchased'?

Which Reply #____ are you referring to?
...then to branch out to include new N.H. U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen,....

Open letter to:

Jeanne Shaheen, U.S. Senator
340 Central Avenue, Suite 205
Dover, N.H. 03820
603: 750-3004

http://congress.org/congressorg/webreturn/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fshaheen.senate.gov

http://maps.google.com/maps?daddr=340%20Central%20Avenue,%20Dover,%20NH,%2003820

Dear Senator Shaheen:

--This is to follow up my paperwork to your daughter at the "Timberland Owners" picnic in Summer 2007 to have given to you then when we talked briefly in the parking lot on your way to the tent in Laconia about the following that I did relay also verbally to your office-worker Madeline just a few minutes ago in Dover at about 9:15 o'clock a.m. that you please get to the root of the problem here of to have your Art. III, Sec. 1 "inferior Court" of Congress STOP their illegal maneuvers there on Pleasant Street, Concord, N.H. until WHOever the state or federal official is who is supposed to file these federal papers as required by 40USC255 and N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution, as backed up by that 1943 case of:

" http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm of: ""In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."

and: "Even the U.S. Attorney KNOWS this by his Manual #664 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm ", see also for 40USC255= http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575

I've already notified the other M.O.C.'s here in New Hampshire of: Gregg, Hodes and Shea-Porter, but that nothing gets done.  There has also been illegal transports of federal prisoners from New Hampshire to Portland, Maine in violation of 18USC3232 but that they do not care BELIEVE IT OR NOT of "my" federal tax money paid indirectly by me through my employer at work, paid by our former N.H. A.G. Jeffrey R. Howard of the First Circuit Court of Appeals out of Boston sitting in his office on the 4th floor of the Rudman Building in Concord, N.H. to these attorneys to attend these illegal hearings!

I did file a written complaint with the Sub-Committee of the House Judiciary Committee that is the oversight committee to look into this, but that the woman there said that it needed to be endorsed by either my U.S. Senator or Federal Rep., neither of whom have done so as requested, and so now you please to do this and/or to have The CRS/ Congressional Research Service look into this to find out finally of WHO to do the what = to file those 40USC255 papers.

Thank you, - - - - - - - -  - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, New Hampshire 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

cc:

1.) The Maine Senator Olympia J. Snowe at:
   
3 Canal Plaza
Suite 601
Portland, ME 04101
Main: (207) 874-0883
Fax: (207) 874-7631

http://snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactSenatorSnowe.DistrictOffices#Portland

re: my telephone call to your office at 9:57 o'clock a.m. to please circuit-break any more of these illegal transports in the future, and have your federal judge there, George Z. Singal, Order the return of illegally spent federal funds as indicated at:

"27  New Hampshire Underground / General Discussion / Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS on: June 28, 2009, 03:15 PM NHFT
Quote from: DonnaVanMeter on June 28, 2009, 01:20 PM NHFT

http://www.redcrayons.net/browndocket09.htm

More 18USC3232 illegal hearings in Portland, Maine I see after the documents #25 + 30 of:

1.) "03/09/2009
 
NOTICE OF HEARING as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown: Status Conference set for 3/11/2009 09:00 AM before Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine, Courtroom #1. Counsel for the Government and both pro-se defendants shall appear in-person. Standby counsel may appear telephonically.(dae) (Entered: 03/09/2009)"; and;

2.) "03/11/2009
 
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine: STATUS CONFERENCE as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown held on 3/11/2009. Government is to file a written response one week from this Friday at noon to the Defendants Motion to Prepare and Defend contained in pleading no. 26. Court to issue a New Scheduling Order. Defendants remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshal. (Court Reporter: L. Dunbar) (Govt Atty: Arnold Huftalen, Terry Ollila) (Defts Atty: Bjorn Lange, Michael Iacopino participated telephonically,) (Defts: Elaine Brown, Edward Brown)(Total Hearing Time: 41 minutes) (dae) (Entered: 03/11/2009)"

cc: both my Fed. Rep. Paul Hodes and U.S. Senator Judd Gregg, to order that they return the money to  Howard to return to Congress that was spent illegally (Judge Jeffrey R. Howard checks #_____ + _______ plus #______ + _______ for $_______ + $______ plus $______ + $_______ respectfully to both defense attorneys. ) and impeach this/these judges who granted and allowed this theft, being also Judge George Z. Singal.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

The end does NOT justify the means.  Procedural "due process" of law has been broken, and so the oaths of these judges to the 5th + 14 Amendments have been violated.  They must be punished by impeachment BEFORE this criminal case #30 can continue!" and;

2.) http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi-bin/newmemberbio.cgi?lang=&member=ME01&site=ctc&address=&city=&state=ME&zipcode=&plusfour=

The Honorable Chellie Pingree
United States House of Representatives
District Office:
57 Exchange Avenue, Suite 302
Portland, ME 04101    Voice: 207-774-5019
FAX: 207-871-0720

re: telephone call of 10:10 o'clock a.m. taken my Ms. _______ who verified the address for where to send my written request for the Impeachment of: George Z. Singal for a violation of 18 USC 3232.

since Senator Susan Collins' office has been contacted too, but that nothing was done by her either! Last year 2008.

[JosephSHaas]

"They" erased another one of my replies over at The "Concord Monitor".

Here's a relay from my e-mail account:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"From the:
http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/83635/64347

entitled: "They used to be called lethal "deadly" weapons. "

"wss1, Here's a question for you:

WHEN were these devices EVER considered "deadly" weapons in New Hampshire?

Answer: In 1988.

WHO said so? State Trooper Joe Gerty. (the Canadian logs didn't like him).

WHERE?: In Plymouth District Court, before Judge Edwin W. Kelly who agreed with him, as a call-in from one of his law-enforcement buddies to prosecute the case for the Town.

WHY?: Because I used a stun gun on frost-covered ground.

HOW long was it before they were NOT considered "deadly" weapons? When County Attorney John B. Eames did the research and dropped the Appeal down from a Class A to Class B felony, and asked Dr. Glenn Bricker of Ashland if he'd testify to the fact that this caused "serious" bodily injury. Dr. B. on the (witness) stand saying that he would ONLY answer the question if he got a $1000 expert "witness" fee, that the County could not afford, and so the charge was dropped down to a misdemeanor.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

footnote #1 for details:

This was in the case against me of: State of New Hampshire v. Joseph S. Haas, Vol. 134 N.H. REPORTS 480, 596 A. 2d 127 (1991) that started out in November 1988 when the local COP dispatched his officer to my neighbor and tenant who had stolen rent money from me under a Town Tax Sale, bought next door, to which I did physically lien this property with my car: a Dodge Aspen, and there of when my other loyal tenant did tell me that some private tow operator (called by the Police) was in the process of hitching up my car to be removed from my lien withOUT due process of law of having to resort to the courts, as one out-of-court theft deserves to be dealt with extra-judicially too, as by my lien of which I did assert my RSA Ch. 627:8 right as spelled out in http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/627/627-8.htm of that: "A person is justified in using force upon another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to prevent what is or reasonably appears to be AN unlawful taking of his property, or criminal mischief, or to retake his property immediately following its taking;" (emphasis ADDed for this ANY word as in ANYbody, and EVERYbody but that by this case-law applicability of the RSA Ch. 642:2 Re-sisting Arrest statute http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/642/642-2.htm AFTER the fact that I did place a "Citizens Arrest" against the officer FIRST by putting my right hand to his shoulder, this word ANY has been case-law amended to include COPS and retrospectively having back-dated this 1991 opinion to INclude this 1988 incident! Totally against the law of Retrospectivity! as supposed to be a guarantee by Article 23 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html Plus the fact that as a landlord I earlier tried to get a tenant's car towed from out of my garage, but that the COPs refused to get involved in a "civil" case telling me to take the tenant to court! And THEN they flip-flopped for my thieving tenant just because he was the highest bidder at their Tax Sale that they eventually lost!

footnote #2 for similarities:

The penetration of this electricity into the body to cause LESS than lethal harm is akin to those Secretary of State stickers they use on the ballot boxes: see over at: The N.H. Primary: Sham Chain of Custody http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM of 6:00 minutes seen 177,156 times, and for the question of "Who's Responsible?" for to see that the stickers are up to the definition of the word: seal as in having to break same to open whatever is seal-ed rather than merely lifted off in one piece as illustrated here too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHL_YMBolRs of 9:15 minutes with 49,985 views so far, See: Article 51, Part 2, N.H. Constitution for the answer in that "The governor shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the laws." http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html "

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The bottom line being that Ed had a perfect right to assert his RSA 627:8 rights too to PREVENT it's* taking also, in Grafton County, as I won that case there too in North Haverhill: County Seat, with my Public Defender, Tom Rappa for the 2 hr. jury trial, with x 3 = 6 hrs. of deliberation to find: NOT GUILTY of resisting arrest for when I did re-take the political poster back from the COP who had taken it down from off my building during a Town Election.  * = the right to prevent, as caretaker, the seizure toward forfeiture of your real estate.         -- Joe

[John Edward Mercier]

Which property are you claiming they 'purchased'?

Which Reply #____ are you referring to?

Originally I had thought that some Fed for ALL the properties in New Hampshire bought by the Feds is supposed to file this 40USC255 paper with the S of S by RSA 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const., but now think that maybe if not even the landlord GSA in Boston for the N.E. Region, nor each particular landlord, like for the court(s) district and circuit/ attorney(s) at Pleasant Street and U.S. Marshals there too plus the BATF&E in Manchester, etc. then maybe the manager of each? as the tenant has to file?  The bottom line being that the governor by his Art. 51 duty is to enforce all state AND national law for which he shall be "responsible for" by Art. 41, but that ONLY the U.S. Code applicable upon us, the state inhabitants either by freedom of choice OR by being dragged to here, AFTER the filing that has NEVER taken place by our blanket or general offer of "Consent" that was not given as a gift on June 14, 1883 but for that exchange, as explained in that 1943 case, that back and/or before the Feds were dealing only in violations at their musical courts in Exeter and Portsmouth before moving to Concord, and now into felonies that means serious business, and so looking to see that all i's are dotted and t's crossed for EVERY minute detail to be performed, because when jurisdiction is challenged it MUST be proven by the party prosecuting, the burden of proof is upon Coluntuono & Company, even by his own U.S. Attorney Manuel #664, and us insisting that our right as an inhabitant have the Art. 12 guarantee or else:

Or else to sue the one "responsible for" allowing the creature/parasite U.S. to go after the creator and guests withOUT authority! I've already sued the governor in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims and to sue for that $5,000 more per day for this past week of Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday + Thursday = $5,000 x 4 = $20,000 in four separate billings on this Monday, July 6th plus since this is supposedly an Art. III, Section 1 "inferior court" headed by Congress, with its heads being The House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi and Senate President/V.P. Joe Biden, to send them bills for same, backdating Pelosi's to when I first contacted her office by telephone at just before the 1:29 p.m. "Contact" that was "Submit"ed from her website AND e-mail to her office worker Jeff for her at 1:37 p.m. last Tuesday, and so her to pay this 1/2 of Tue., Wed. + Thu. of: $12,500 more. But read my reply to Raymond at the http://www.concordmonitor.com of maybe this is ONLY some contract court UNTIL it is both ordained AND established.  Anyway with them pretending to be a lawful court, that's fraud, and so with Jeff saying to get faster action to see my M.O.C.'s (Members of Congress), thus having already contacted Fed. Reps. Shea-Porter AND Hodes (from where I live and work) PLUS Sen. Gregg to see to it that this unlawful and illegal-ness stop, and to return the $money to the Feds that was spent illegally for transports over to Maine, and telling Susan Collins' office too by e-mail and phone last year, reference 18USC3232, then to branch out to include new N.H. U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, plus MAine U.S. Senator Olympia Snow on Monday too, plus whichever Federal Rep. of either Chellie Pingree or Mike Michaud covers for the U.S. Courthouse in Portland, Maine, see http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/cgi-bin/newseek.cgi?site=ctc&state=me

So does this mean that the $5000 per day is divided up by each element having to pay $x,xxx instead?  I don't car how much each pays, just that maybe one of threse block-heads will get it through their thick skull and at least TRY to find out that somebody is ultimately "responsible for" this fiasco! Plus to impeach Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe) Burling, Retired Grafton County Superior Court judge who violated her RSA Ch. 92:2 oath by allowing the Feds as defendants in her court to push the case over to them by "Removal" per some U.S. Code that has NEVER been accepted by us per Article 12 when Ed filed his case there, and those thieving N.H. Supreme Court judges on Danny's case (also that Strafford County Superior Court Judge Steven Houran, former A.A.G. in Dover who never gave him a hearing on his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, as required by the "complete" word to read AND hear by Art. 14); to impeach by Art. 17 for an Art. 38 trial in the Senate. A copy of this going to the Chair and Vice Chair of the Legislator's Council for the Petition for Redress of Grievance, who next meet in Room 207 L.O.B. at 12 o'clock high noon re-starting in September (after their 2 month Summer vacation), to process this Article 32 Petition for Impeachment, as endorsed with their signatures of sponsor and co-sponsor(s) by House Rule 36 with their District (not Seat) #, so that it can get an LSR from Legislative Services this Fall, to be given a Bill # for a hearing in the appropriate committee by House Rule 4 onto a full vote in the House to impeach ALL of them! 4 currently sitting, and that Galway, retired to eliminate his and their Art. 36 retirements too!

Yours truly, Joe Haas, "Sovereign Citizen" 

Too long a post... my question is which property was 'purchased' by the federal government that would equate to US Con Art 1-8-17?

[JosephSHaas]

Which property are you claiming they 'purchased'?

Which Reply #____ are you referring to? ....

Too long a post... my question is which property was 'purchased' by the federal government that would equate to US Con Art 1-8-17?

You mean they didn't buy it but that maybe it was a gift?

[JosephSHaas]

Another Margot report at:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090707/FRONTPAGE/907070303&template=page3

entitled: "Ed had a lawful + legal right to use force against these outlaws"

"In addition to Article 10 in the law,   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html  see also the statute:

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/627/627-8.htm

"TITLE LXII, CRIMINAL CODE, CHAPTER 627. JUSTIFICATION, Section 627:8
627:8 Use of Force in Property Offenses. – A person is justified in using force upon another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to prevent what is or reasonably appears to be AN** unlawful taking of his property, or criminal mischief, or to RETAKE*  his property immediately following its taking; but he may use deadly force under such circumstances only in defense*** of a person as prescribed in RSA 627:4.

Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973." (* emphasis ADDed, as I won this in the State v. Haas case of when the COP charged me with resisting arrest for re-taking my political poster he had taken off my building that he claimed the Town owned after a Tax Sale that had yet gotten to court, and during the Town Election.)

** AN as in any.

Ed was "justified in using force upon an"ybody like the Marshal goons, because "he reasonably believe"d it necessary to pre-vent what was or reasonably appeared to be an UNlawful taking, in that the Feds had NOT filed their 40USC255 papers with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State by RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution, and their attempt to take-over the property (by militant force as evidence over the real evidence of the gold-sealed certificate of federal non-filing) was properly offset by Ed in the "defense"***.

Even the local, county and state law-enforcement community had an obligation to protect Ed, by Article 12, of which he did pay the property tax bills every year. 

Result: Not guilty for asserting his lawful and legal rights."

[JosephSHaas]

More never-endings:

over at: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/84093/64664

QUESTION:

"Bailing out
New By NH always on Tue, 07/07/2009 - 06:44

Sounds like shes bailing on poor Ed, she is just an innocent bystander!!

Possesion of firearms by a convicted felon is illegal. Of course in some "minds" all the courts in the country are illegal, (smile)"

ANSWER:

" So then WHY isn't the State going after the guns?"

"NH always: Thank you "very" much.

Not: for the use of the "all" word in your sentence #2, because your use of that word for 100% of the courts in the entire "country" of this United States of America is wrong! see: http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm as I've found that the Feds in MAss.achusetts have never filed their 40USC255 papers with the Secretary of State there either,

But: for your "Possession of firearms by a convicted felon", because according to: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/RSA/html/XII/159/159-3.htm "159:3 Convicted Felons. – I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he: ...(b) Has been convicted in either a state or federal court in this or any other state...of: ... (3) A felony violation of the laws of ...the United States (and) II. The state SHALL confiscate to the use of the state the weapon or weapons of persons convicted under this section...." (emphasis ADDed.)

So Ed's conviction in Federal court back in the April 2007 sentence from the January 2007 finding of guilty was to a felony? Then WHY isn't the State making a claim to the guns? as they MUST do?

Because that would open it up to the fact that one canNOT enter into court with unclean hands.  WHERE was the state for when Ed put in a claim for them to protect him from the Feds as outlined in Article 12?

Yeah, thank you "very" much!  The State Dept. of Revenue did make some contract or agreement with the Feds for what would have been the $ monetary fine against Elaine from what would have been her corporate tax as a licensed dentist, but WHERE is the claim for these guns?

Don't us citizens deserve our Attorney General to enter the case to claim them, and so that Ed can use this answer?

Yours truly, Joe Haas, P.S. And in preparation of anyone citing that 134 NH 480 stun gun case of State v. Haas (1991) against me for not the right to re-take (as I won that case), but for not to pre-vent, let me tell you of that the jury DID ask: can we find him not guilty if we find that he was "set up" by an arrogant COP? The judge telling my attorney only, not informing me the client, and so a violation of his ethics AND the judge's RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to abide by the Rules too, for "complete" justice by Art. 14, in that by the Rule for the "Entrapment" Defense, the answer was and still is: "yes", but that the judge answered the jury with a fence-sitter reply of: that's a question of fact for you to decide."