Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 32

[JosephSHaas]

Letter from Jason Gerhard:

http://newhampshirefreepress.com/node/463

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. John F. Kennedy"

From GOOGLE for the words: peaceful revolution inevitable JFK

1. http://investment-blog.net/those-who-make-peaceful-revolution-impossible-will-make-violent-revolution-inevitable-jfk/

"By Daniel at 28 March, 2009, 11:32 pm ...10. Suspend the rule of law."

2. http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/7qwzb/those_who_make_peaceful_revolution_impossible/

"LeeJunFan 29 points30 points31 points 5 months ago[-]

Take away the peoples rights to assemble peacefully, and they'll assemble in a different way."

On June 6, 2007 two events happened: (1) the Feds were laying in wait for Ed secretly in the bushes to try to nab him as he went for a ride on his lawnmower to the end of his driveway to pick up his mail but that somebody else got it that day since I was talking with Ed about my: (2) visit that night to the Lebanon City Council to tell them, in no uncertain terms, that their C.O.P. was a thief for not Article 12 protecting Elaine's Dental property.

On June 7th was when they shot and then tazered Danny, took him to St. Gaudens National Park, and grilled him to try to turncoat on Ed.

On June 20th I did meet with Ed & Elaine, Bernie, Randy, Reno and others to sign that Article 49 Petition for a peaceful resolution, that I did deliver to the governor's office on June 21st @ 4:30 p.m. David Ridley telling us later that he met the governor who told him that Ed was not even "on his radar unit". Oh really!?

So what's next if not a peaceful parley? between the Feds and our Chief Law Enforcement officer to do his Article 51 duty for which he is Art. 41 responsible for. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

Here in New Hampshire we have not only the First Amendment right to assemble, but also this right and duty to assemble not just for the sake of a peaceful assembly, but to assemble "in a different way" by Article 10, as said L.J.F. above. The word different defined as unlike or dis-similar; not the same; and unusual, distinctive. So if the usual course of Art. 32 petitions, as to the Legislature have gone nowhere in the past in that even when House Rule 36 properly endorsed by the Rep(s) with District Number(s), the House Speaker still refuses to process by House Rule 4 over to the appropriate committee, as I did try to get same done from and back to this House State-Fed Relations Committee that Winter-Spring 2007, and thus to the Executive branch/ Governor later that Spring/Summer 2007, [since Ed's original action as plaintiff against the Feds to Grafton County Superior Court was dealt with by Judge Mrs. Jean K. (N.H. Senator Peter Hoe) Burling to use some anti- Art. 12 over-ride of the N.H. law by these U.S. Codes to get it out of her court for a "Removal" to the Feds, this is EXACTly where and when things started to go VERY wrong! Thus a Bill of Impeachment against her Art. 36 Retirement as undeserving to start immediately!] then if no action there either, for all of July, August and September before the 10-4 over and out, why didn't I take the governor to the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims right away? Yes I should have in hindsight but didn't, instead I did: ____________ (see pages #__ - ___of my Archives here),  During that three months Danny was captured in September and then TRYing for an Art. 14 hearing in Strafford County Superior Court in Dover on his Petition for a Writ of  Habeas Corpus that made it on appeal to the N.H. Supreme Court, who like Burling, did an ant-Art. 12 that ought to get them impeached too, by allowing the Feds to even deviate from their U.S. Codes in not only having to be a defendant in the case, as they were the intervenors, but that the Supremes did allow them to NOT "push" BUT "pull" the case to there Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 "Place" that they must have believed then that of our offer to the Feds on June 14, 1883 by RSA Ch. 123:1 was made, and somehow because of the fact of their non-filing per the certificate of federal non-filing with the gold-seal from Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State, that it was NOT a conditional consent!? Then what type was it?  Like some modern dance of the Chubby Checker "Twist" eh? But no! As in the expression of: "It takes two to tango". And so to have Ed & Elaine try for another Habeas in this same court with a different judge was not a former prosecutor with the A.G.'s office, as we are also entitled by Art. 35 "to be tried by judges as impartial as the lot of humanity will admit". I don't think that, at the time Danny did have his case there or in his Appeal #2007-0745 that he cited that Adams v. United States case of 1943 in the United States Supreme Court (that Bob Schulz did write about, and who I did meet with at Ed's place, but that I didn't find out about this case until later). Vol. 319 U.S. REPORTS 312, 87 L. Ed. 1421 and 63 S.Ct. 1122, quoting from U.S. statute 40 USC 255, Interpretive Note #14: "In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States provided in said section, AND FACT THAT STATE HAS AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT TO TAKE JURISDICTION IS IMMATERIAL." (emphasis ADDed for immaterial = inconsequential, lacking importance.) And so for the judge to weigh not the offer but the acceptance, IF ANY, and when found to be NONE here, then "NO JURISDICTION EXISTS IN UNITED STATES TO ENFORCE FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAWS" against any of our inhabitants, and so the Petition for Writ is to be GRANTED. Ed & Elaine Brown, and then each of the Freedom Four, in turn, to be set free, as by Rule 63 collateral attacks where they are now too AFTER a __ U.S. Code ___ or Rule #__ Petition to this very same U.S. District Court in Concord, N.H. is denied, or will it be?  To try to talk about this with Ed next weekend, and/or for the attorney assigned to him to file similar action entitled a Motion to Arrest the Judgment based on these legal grounds.

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Letter from Jason Gerhard:

http://newhampshirefreepress.com/node/463

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Galt

in the bio section, paragraph #3 of 3: "Taggart and the strikers rescue Galt as he is being tortured by the government."

Thank you Jason, for the details of HOW: "Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged contains a scene that has always stuck with me. In it the heroine, Dagny Taggart, is trying to free John Galt from a government torture chamber. As she makes her way to the entrance, a guard stands blocking the way. Dagny tells him to open the door or she will kill him, but he can't make a decision, citing his orders. Ayn Rand writes what happens next, "she [Dagny], who would have hesitated to fire at an animal, pulled the trigger and fired straight at the heart of a man who wanted to exist without the responsibility* of consciousness."

Tyrants throughout history have depended upon legions of unthinking henchmen to carry out their dastardly deeds. "

So to go after the "henchmen"? like Ayn Rand's "Dagney Taggert" and her #___ strikers? No; not for me.  My preference is to go after the Puppet-Masters: In this case the Executives, like now of The Stafford County Commissioners in Dover who still think and say for me to get down on my knees to ask permission from one of these Feds to visit Ed like an animal in a cage, even AFTER I told them to read the last sentence of Article 12 of the N.H. Bill of Rights, that they took an RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to obey, but who refused to do so, one Commissioner John Dumas speaking up to interrupt me, and me telling him to: "Shut Up!" (I think I might have said it in question form of: "Would you PLEASE 'Shut Up'!?"    I have the floor, (or like Ronald Reagan said: "Mr. Green*, I paid for this microphone! * actually Mr. Breen); Ray Bower, the County Administrator coming to his rescue, and the entire meeting on tape for anybody to listen to of how they "pass the buck." And so with them with erroneous information and non-information to this 40USC255 stuff from their attorney they I guess need a stronger legal opinion like from the judge on a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, right?  So that I can talk with Ed back on his own turf and out in the sunshine and in the fresh air.  That is my goal. To talk about who to hire and pay x% to and how to sue whoever like our governor for dereliction of his Art. 51 duty that he shall be "responsible for" by Article 41 that he contracted for such negative consequences against him by his signed RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office.  Every day of incarceration counting as a different offense before the "even"ing, and so how many RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 Petitions by Ed & Elaine do you think it will take at up to $50,000 each before Lynch is relieved of his multi $millions? 

[JosephSHaas]

Letter from Jason Gerhard:
http://newhampshirefreepress.com/node/463

Re: "My cellie, an 18 year-old CRIP of Cambodian decent taught me a great deal about Asian culture, including their superstitions. Did you know that eating or combing your hair in the dark is just asking for paranormal trouble?

See: http://trishgood1.tripod.com/superstitions.html for not exactly "in the dark" for the comb, but to: " Avoid combing your hair after dark".   But see: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Blonde_burnette_red-haired_genral_hair_superstitions

and for who? and why? = "It is unlucky for a woman to comb her hair after dark if she has a relative at sea."

plus: where? http://mysticwicks.com/archive/index.php/t-164.html

"Kaylara
February 9th, 2001, 11:55 PM
-- Posted by samoanshark on 7:00 pm on Dec. 31, 1969
Have you heard of the samoans superstitions?
Don't comb your hair in front of your mirror at night...

Apparently, the Samoans believe that our ancestors spirits are forever walking around. Most of the Samoans bury their dead in their front yard. They believe that their dead family members' spirits will watch over their land and their family. Plus they can always go right out front and talk to them whenever they feel like it. Many Samoans believe that some of the spirits don't like changes and new ways. The spirits expect you to do or not to do certain things, especially at night. Supposedly, the spirits believe you should be sleeping instead of cleaning or primping. Some Samoans say that if you comb your hair at night in front of the mirror a mean spirit will show his face in the mirror or another spirit that is against vanity might pull your hair. So, if you go to many Samoan houses you will see their mirrors covered at night with a sheet or cloth...

Whistling at night is taboo, too! I've heard people have had their mouths slapped by a spirit and one person's mouth stayed crooked from the slap. No loud noises in the village at night. Bad things will happen to you."

Yeah, That's why I whistle the Andy Griffith tune only during the day.  Jason: try this test in there of if it falls on the TV Land Channel, and another inmate whistles along with it late that night, check to see if his mouth be crooked in the morning.

             +                    +         

[JosephSHaas]

What will we learn from this Maine man?

Re: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/86451/67066

entitled:"A judge of EXTRA-ordinary colors!"

of: "http://judgepedia.org/index.php/Brock_Hornby

""a man of extraordinary brilliance,"

or in other words:

an intellect of bright, shining splendor that there probably be a glory cloud* around his head! sparkling, glittering, illustrious, un-usual mental keenness.

Assembled to achieve beyond extreme favor to rigor jurus!

In my words: to turn this coal of a court here into what should be like a diamond or other gem.

-* Biblical: http://www.thebiblestudypage.com/taber_cloud.shtml
and: http://www.prophetic.net/glorycloud.htm plus: http://endtimespropheticwords.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/todd-bentley-and-the-shekinah-glory-cloud/ also: http://headedhome.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/glory-cloud/

** airplane: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.atm.helsinki.fi/~tpnousia/gengal/glory.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.atm.helsinki.fi/~tpnousia/gengal/glory.html&h=358&w=515&sz=28&tbnid=BXGGUsSZ5LKiCM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=131&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dglory%2Bcloud&hl=en&usg=__ieLgaMG61-OdZD2mU5oUECHqRkU=&ei=0ihjSoXkDOKBtgeCnKnzDw&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=6&ct=image  "

[JosephSHaas]

More info about HOW the FEDERAL taxes are to be collected from us here in New Hampshire:

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090719/FRONTPAGE/907199998

entitled: "No comment until the time limit starts. (;-) "

of: "Re: paragraph #8: "Tausch has been reluctant to talk about much beyond his thoughts on government. He has not responded to multiple* interview requests from the Monitor in recent weeks; his staffers didn't even respond to requests to confirm information about him. Tausch reportedly also avoided talking to a reporter from Union Leader this month."

* how many? #____ 

I called him too, and voiced my opinion of how Art. 95, N.H. ought to work with our state collectors of both state "and" FEDERAL taxes, as a check-and-balance put in there by our state Founding Fathers for when our creature of a national government turns more a parasite upon its creator and host, to keep "Uncle Sam" trim in being fed only what he "needs", not everything he wants, as like what our city and town tax collectors ought to be doing too, or at least if they're too lazy to effect the Art. 38, Part 1 & Bill of Rights "frugality" clause up front, like in the Rose & Milton Friedman plan, that the affect be for the Selectmen to honor an Abatement, refund or return of payments of taxes back to us for all of the amounts unlawfully overpaid to those above the poverty line, 55NH503@505,par.2(1875).

He must be absorbing all this in, like at some Monastery? And then will take the balcony? to show "his" brilliance? Hey! These future public servants work for us.  If they don't "take" our phone calls now, just imagine what they will NOT do when they're on the payroll! His answer maybe being: that he does TAKE the phone calls; just that you've got to wait MORE than even like the RSA Ch. 91-A of 10 days at the state, or more than 20 business days at the federal level for an answer.  Technically the race doesn't start until June of 2010 right? They are "exploring" the possibility of running.  So WHO is the explorer?  We're like the Indians to him and her (Kelly Ayotte). They're exploring us to see what type of savages we are: those to elevate them to be as a god, or to cut off their head! (;-) "

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the latest from: "Scoop":

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090719/FRONTPAGE/907190306

and of my reply

entitled: "Time for "The Mighty Quinn" to be seen and heard! "

of: "Although the Marshals might not have contracted with this company, as to have hired them, or worked "with" them, as alongside at the same time, the Mighty Quinn*, they might have used them, like they used the power of persuasion upon the N.H. Electric Co-Op of Plymouth to unbolt the power leading into the "compound" so that the Free Speech and of Association rights by the First Amendment (and Art. 12** + 22, N.H. in "how"** so to terminate) be terminated in what was an Art. 10 Revolution by the Browns against what they perceived was an unlawful attack upon them and their private property. 

Militant actions by militants using federal force as evidence against the real evidence that was NOT allowed to be put into the case for the jury to weigh in that there be no 40USC255 acceptance of our N.H. RSA 123:1 offer as required by the case-law as spelled out in the Adams v. United States U.S. Supreme Court case of 319 U.S. Reports 312 of 1943, see Note 14 for this Statute At Large, of not to be applied to the in-small of withIN one of the 50 states UNTIL this action be taken, and here in New Hampshire, by that federal officer under oath to have to file by the "shall" word of papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State!

Look at the precise wording of this Huftalen assistant to the U.S. Attorney, and compare it to his signed attempt to try to have Cirino Gonzalez waive his right to not be transported to outside the District unless he gives them his written "consent". And so yet ANOTHER "consent" word violated! and there being nothing done about it!? Reference 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution and 18USC3232 respectfully, as both Ed & Elaine were transported to Maine illegally too two times. I even have the original signed document that Reno did mail to me proving this.  Did either of the attorneys for Ed or Elaine call me to the witness stand? on a subpoena duces tacum to bring this evidence that should have been marked into an exhibit! Why not?  Because they are in cahoots with this judge and the one who pays them these checks for their travels over to there in Portland. 

Who to put a halt to this? I've complained to the G.S.A. Landlord of this Art. III, Section 1 "inferior court" of Congress, and its head tenant too: Nancy Pelosi, The Speaker of the House, and to my Federal Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter by my filing paperwork with her Dover office on my Friday afternoon visit to there  to have this Judge George Z. Singal impeached!

Does Judge David Brock Hornby want to be put into the same boat? Re: his having been assigned to the Kevin Guay land case, see my Archives here for maybe this judge will be "brillian"t enough to have figured this out of checking for their operating papers before he sets sail to over here in what is like the Sargaso Sea or "Bermuda Triangle" where everyone who sets foot here withOUT first looking into this gets swallowed whole. No escape but to try to wrangle out of the mess by deviation from The Rule of Law!

* "Mighty Quinn (Quinn the Eskimo) by Manfred Mann" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnQFmvICP_0 of 3:06 minutes, with 209,387 views so far. Does the Rudman Building have an owl? (;-) or a fake one like at The State House? Watch out for The Pigeon Man.  You've seen that Alfred Hitchcock movie of "The Birds", right?  And of the swooping birds by the bridge over on Loudon Road by Fort Eddy Road? Might such a flock take to this place? (;-) An Omen? "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/86849/67156

entitled: "Fred on the radio wants more info from us to do what? "

of: ""NH": You did, but that I guess he doesn't read The "Concord Monitor" on-line version?

You can hear him talk over at: http://granitegrok.com/MeetTheNewPress/Show_By_Hour/04-25-09_Hour1.mp3  This is from: http://granitegrok.com/blog/2009/04/meet_the_new_press_podcast_for_042509.html and http://www.politicker.com/new-hampshire/tags/fred-tausch click on the first hour of two, of actually 45 minutes (without the commercial breaks) at The Lakes Region Radio Talk Show with Doug Lambert and Skip Murphy out of Gilford (plus sometimes(?) Pat Hines) on Saturdays from 9:00 to 11:00 o'clock a.m. Radio 1490 AM WEMJ out of Laconia, N.H. 524-1323 (according to Kim) http://www.ontheradio.net/radiostations/wemjam.aspx with having to listen through The N.H. Marriage bill for the first 1/2 hour and THEN the last 15 minutes with Fred and his http://www.stewardofprosperity.org/meet/fred to explore later.

Fred telling us that he gathers information like the statistics of that we get back 50% of what we pay into the Feds, and so subsidizing those states who are NOT fiscally responsible, thus rewarding failure, and that we have got to hold our elected/ public official accountable for why they expend so much when they should be cutting back, for thus less taxes to pay.  A caller Jorge from Hampstead who did call in to ask his question of HOW to join forces to magnify the message, and Fred telling him and us to hold coffee (and tea) parties at what Doug said of at the local grass roots level in our own backyards (like Tip O'Neill, the House Speaker from Boston said years ago) and for such ideas he/Fred would like to hear from you so as to present to our representatives for answers...is what I've already done in HOW the Feds are supposed to get their federal tax money is by Art. 95 state collectors of such for both state "and" federal taxes, so as to keep "Uncle Sam" from getting too fat, to give him a "trim", or dare I say a lypo-suction (;-) treatment! I'm still waiting for an answer to this per my June letters to both The State Dept. of Revenue Administration and The State Archives to please answer by the end of July to WHO were these Art. I, Section 8, Clause 1 U.S. Constitution uniform collectors of both taxes back in 1912, or we operating at the national level only needing to charge duties on imports, etc. and before the ratification in 1913 of the 16th Amendment for the un-uniform taxes. The end does NOT justify the means, and especially for us here in New Hampshire thanks to our state Founding Fathers putting this in for our procedural due process of law, that we have deviated from and have got to get back on track!

"NH" re: your thought of to ditch the Federal Reserve System, I say no! Hold them AND the U.S. Mint accountable for Section 16 of their Act of 1913. THEN to maybe ditch them, after liquidating their assets, and contract with another private entity who will honor their signed agreement! like maybe WALMART who handled the distribution of the Year 2000 pennies, remember that? for The Millenium. Thus BTW where are these Year 2009 Abe Lincoln Cabin Coins? I keep hearing about. http://2009lincolnpennies.com/coins/lincoln-cent-design-1-kentucky-birth-and-childhood-penny/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[John Edward Mercier]

Article 95 works on excise taxes... i.e. gasoline.

http://taxfoundation.org/taxdata/show/22685.html
Seems the 50% is a little low.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the latest from: "Scoop":

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090719/FRONTPAGE/907190306

and of my reply

entitled: "Time for "The Mighty Quinn" to be seen and heard! "

of: ................................. "Comment blocked by moderator" ....................

as indicated above for either late morning or early afternoon today, as it ain't there now, as having been erased!

[keith in RI]

07/20/2009 NOTICE OF HEARING as to Edward Brown, Elaine Brown: Telephone Conference set for 7/24/2009 11:00 AM before Judge George Z. Singal. The court in Maine will initiate the call. (dae) (Entered: 07/20/2009)



if this guys story is true (and i have to say it takes balls to make a story like this up and go to the courts with it if its not true and you have no evidence to back it up) it means that the feds hired at least 2 private (mercenary) firms to help apprehend the browns. in court it came out that "dutch" was a private contractor i think, and now this guy and his company???? how many more private firms were hired along the way? what WAS the actual cost of the browns apprehension/prosecution etc....?? was eds arrest lawful? or was it actually a citizens arrest made by this private contractor dutch? does marshal monier and his team really deserve the awards they received for this case or should they go to the private contractors instead?? were these private contractors hired by lowest bid? what is the process involved in getting the contract and i guess this means the marshals DON'T always get their man huh????

[JosephSHaas]

Re: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090719/FRONTPAGE/907190306

entitled: "New Evidence In Ed & Elaine Brown Case" Is it a Red Herring"

of: "New Evidence In Ed & Elaine Brown Case" Is it a Red Herring
New By RaymondKarczewski on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 19:11

New Evidence In Ed & Elaine Brown Case" Is it a Red Herring to Misdirect Attention away from Court's Lack of Jurisdiction?

This whole issue of "late" evidence suddenly offered up by a Security Agent in the "after-the-verdict" Defense Of Ed and Elaine Brown, just SMACKS of a red herring designed to keep public attention glued at the superficial level of mindless theories/opinions and slurs while ignoring the FUNDAMENTAL LAW that was not obeyed by the Courts, i.e., the establishment PROOF OF JURISDICTION in response to Ed and Elaine Brown's Challenge.

It has all the appearances of "Keep the Sheeple misdirected", while the Satanic Judicial System grinds away at the freedom, liberty, reputation and life of Ed and Elaine Brown, a man and a woman who exercised their Right to Trial in a Constitutional Court but was denied by an Unconstitutional Administrative Court whose limited jurisdiction is based in contract law.

The Real Legal Issue still remains to be the Court's lack of Proof of Jurisdiction over Ed and Elaine via Judge Singal's "denial" without statement rather than his written proof JURISDICTION as present law dictates.

A wave of American protest must inundate the courts and cause this basic question of JURISDICTION to be answered, completely and unequivocably, by the Judge, and/or Prosecuting Attorneys accompanied by their Oath or Affidavit upon their own private, unlimited, commercial liability if America is to continue to be "The Land of the Free." and not a slave colony for the New World Order.

That is the only question that can settle the "guilt or innocence of Ed and Elaine Brown and remove it from the "smoke and mirrors" of a lawyer directed word-twisting, atmosphere by bringing it out into the open and into the full light of Day. American's are ruled by Illusion. All illusion is Satanic, Intellectual, unreal. It is time for America and the rest of the world to WAKE UP to that fact..

The authorities are hoping the public has a short memory span amd can and will be manipulated away from the REAL LAW in this case, so they may go back to "railroading Ed and Elaine Brown.

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Cave Junction Oregon
   
Vote
0

    * post a new comment
    * reply to this
    * report a violation
    * email this"

[JosephSHaas]

Re: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090721/OPINION/907210424

entitled: "Federal gas tax at the LOCAL level is a violation of Article 12."

of: "Retired Representative Carol Moore,  for to have looked out for our interests/ past tense, and "Hunter Dan" who seems to be that hunter gone-asleep on the knoll waiting for whatever to pass him unawares: "you people" disgust me!

Carol: you write in your paragraph #3 that: "The economy has tanked", but what are YOU doing about it? In your last paragraph #5 of 5 you write that: "The Monitor has explained that...for economy's sake, local issues will be highlighted." To which I reply that yes: per the http://www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/administration/roadtoll/ or Road Toll website for the state we pay 19.6 cents State gas tax, but that we also pay 19.6 cents there too at the LOCAL pump for the 18.4 cents of the federal gas tax.  WHO authorized that!?

The Browns asked the Feds for WHAT made them liable to be put into the Section 1 of the code chart for to pay $x amount if making this or that $level in their work, and the government  FAILed to answer the question and claim of: "Show Ed the Law", a bumper sticker that we all should have on our car, and applied not only to the 16th Amendment, but for this federal gas tax too.  Or in other words: show us the "Consent" we gave as inhabitants of the state of New Hampshire to submit ourselves to be "controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent". Reference Article 12 of the N.H. Bill of Rights, and Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.  The consent of June 14, 1883 by RSA Ch. 123:1 was a conditional consent.  Was it ever accepted by any Title 40 U.S. Code 255 papers filed at Bill Gardner's N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the "shall" word that is a must/ mandatory duty? No! Where was and is the law-enforcement on this? 

I did just call the State Dept. of Safety, Division of Administration, Road Toll Bureau, 33 Hazen Drive, Room 116, Concord, N.H. 03305, 8:15- 4:15 M-F @ 603: 271-2311 and accomplished two agendas: (1) was told by Linda to call the IRS # 1-800-829-3676 press 1 for English, 3 for taxes, 2 for business taxes, 3 for other, getting put on hold to a Mr. Craig #3505606 over to a Mr. Calhoon #3505798 who did tell me the 18.4 amount; and (2) called back to Eric who said that the State does NOT collect the tax, but that it is pre- paid at some filling terminal and passed onto us consumers at the pump, and to go to the major oil company websites to complain. But in actuality my complaint being to the N.H. Dept. of Safety, Division of State Police to please enforce the N.H. law of Article 12. To give them a call at 271-2450 *when next at a gas station in Concord in YOUR former District, that MOBIL station on South Main Street and see what happens! It will be a LOCAL event, and you to deal with it as a lobbeyist now? , not just shoot off your mouth to say that you've had enough of the Browns!

* N.H. State Police: http://www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/nhsp/ Colonel Frederick H. Booth, Director. For RSA Ch. 637:5 Theft by Extortion. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/637/637-5.htm and/or the local Concord COPs at http://www.ci.concord.nh.us/sitemgrv2/concordv2.asp?siteindx=deptlst&alphaid=P    Police 603-225-8600 e-mail: police at onconcord dot com plus YOUR tel. # 228-9146 at 38 South Spring Street, Concord, N.H. 03301.

cc: of this with the copy of my payment receipt as having overpaid this unlawful #amount under/after written and verbal pro-test to the manager there to deal with this too, by please sending this up the chain-of-command to halt this unlawful tax!

footnote: WHO and WHERE are these Article 95 state collectors of both state "and" federal taxes and WHY aren't they doing their job in accordance with the law!?

P.S. I just tried called MOBIL at: ______  (them only with a contact box) and asked beyond their:   "What if my organization is tax exempt? If your fleet is exempt from motor fuel excise tax or certain sales taxes – at Federal, State, County or City levels – the program can significantly reduce your accounting and administrative time. For qualified fleets, fuel purchases are billed NET of applicable fuel taxes." (emphasis ADDed)     at: http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/GFM/How_to_Buy/XOMUniversal_faq.asp as it applies to ALL of us here in New Hampshire! Thus for all of us to get these NET billings in this state UNTIL the Feds comply with the law! So at present "they" are the "outlaws"!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-E "

[John Edward Mercier]

NH Con Article 12 does not override Part First Article 7.
I don't know how many times I have to post that once the federal government is empowered under Article 7... its no longer a NH Constitution issue.

[JosephSHaas]

NH Con Article 12 does not override Part First Article 7.
I don't know how many times I have to post that once the federal government is empowered under Article 7... its no longer a NH Constitution issue.

John or Jed, or whatever your name is, is that I've already explained back to you numerous times too that a ratification of the U.S. Constitution is not the same as a delegation of power for what you call "empower"ment: to invest with legal power; authorize; to enable or permit.  Yes, we joined the Union, but that the Union even in their very own contract spells it out that BEFORE their federal legislation can apply to us, they must get our "Consent", and that is by the 40USC255 acceptance to our RSA Ch. 123:1 offer here in New Hampshire.  If not so, then WHY even bother putting a Title 40, Section 255 of the Code into place for HOW to deal with it to begin with!? And don't give me this Supremacy Clause B.S. for Article VI, Sec. 2, U.S. Constitution, because you now know that it is not that all statutes must be pursuant to with the letter t, but that all statutes of the Feds are NOT applicable to us withIN N.H. by Article 12, because they have not been made "in Pursuance" to the WAY of having them acknowledged UNTIL the Feds do comply with our RSA Ch. 123:1. I find it amazing that within just minutes of my posting this stuff here you seem to be right onto it to seem to divert people AWAY from the truth.  WHO are you? A Fed?

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/87379/67432

entitled: "Lazy"

of: "

Patricia, If you had done more than "skimmed over" the articles you would have read that when the Browns did say of to: "Show Ed the Law", that it was not a bluff, that he WOULD pay what he supposedly owes, as they DID find about $100,000 in $100 bills, plus gold and silver coins and bars there on the property AFTER "they" took him into custody.  The point being that a tax is NOT a debt! Read your own (Henry Campbell) Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition (c)1979 @ page 1307 for that New Jersey case.  Thus the end does NOT justify the means. To turn a tax into a debt here in New Hampshire (whether it be state or federal), the party "requesting" same has got to follow the law! It's called procedural due process of law and is supposed to be a guarantee by the 5th + 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The "Rule of Law".  Have you ever read that very last sentence in Article 12 of our N.H. Bill of Rights?  WHERE is the "consent" we were supposed to have given "them"? The 1-8-17 U.S. "Consent"? It's in N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 but of what type?  A conditional consent, by 40USC255.  Have the Feds complied with the law?  No! Then who are the real "outlaw"s!? Jurisdiction must be proven when challenged, not merely the judge saying so, and a jury in ignorance too, or are they?, or even one of them to question their very existence after the fact by reading here later? To send Ed & Elaine to a Federal "Correctional" Facility, F.C.I. to be "corrected"?  Corrected to what? "Their" way of doing things!? That's why I was at Federal Rep. Carol-Shea Porter's office in Dover last Friday: to get her boss: Nancy Pelosi, the co-head of this Art. III, Sec. 1 "inferior court" of Congress*, as the tenant of this Rudman Building, under the G.S.A. landlord to comply with the law! WHO is that federal official who is supposed to be filing these papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State?  And WHEN filed are we going to get an apology from them AFTER-ward? Who is "responsible for" to have this done? Our governor, by these words in quotes at Article 41 and his Art. 51 duty to enforce the laws of both state and federal, not just SOME of the laws, but ALL of them as by his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to Article 14 to be "complete"! Him to answer to me in the RSA 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims in September. Maybe by then Shea-Porter will also file a Bill of Impeachment against these two judges who paid for and allowed these 18USC3232 illegal hearings to occur in Portland, Maine.  A telephone conference set up for this Friday @ 11:00 a.m. I've been told.  So if not by person, then by voice violation too? Of the judge in Maine and the attorneys where? in the Dover jail? Can somebody look into preventing this AND investigate these past wrongs?

* somebody just sent me a letter that I did receive in the mail yesterday that of to look to Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 9 U.S. for the exact words of: "To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court." The word tribunal defined as a seat or court of justice; from the Latin word tribunus or tribune, noun: a protector or champion of the people.  So did Congress do so?  No! They've confirmed the nomination of the U.S. Attorney as the prosecutor, but WHERE be the confirmed Champion of the People? An appointee from the Court itself, as in an indirect?  If so, then WHY do we NOT have the Court appoint the U.S. Attorney!? Thus where be the equal rights to have the Congress directly appoint our Champion? The credit for this goes to Danny Riley who did write me this last Monday, July 13th while awaiting what was to be (and already done?) of his shipment out last Friday(?) back to the F.C.I. to be further "corrected".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "