Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 33

[JosephSHaas]

RE:  http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/87379/67439

entitled: "Yeah, Let's Ramble.  The shotgun approach. (;-) "

of: "

"Allman Brothers - Ramblin' Man" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WGVW7byRCA of 6:26 minutes; with 597,647 views so far.

"NH always": thank you for that "misguided" word, but mis-used in that context, it being you who have been mislead. Lucky for you that error be not of action but mere belief, or was it? Actually an error for to what? have paid your taxes voluntarily so that others need not pay? (;-) Are you proud of the fact that you have not only given to "Uncle Sam" his meal, but desert too? And directly, instead of through our N.H. Middleman for the Art. 95 check-and-balance. Re: for what "Uncle Sam" not only needs, but wants? Like Nancy Pelosi's jet to travel back and force from Washington, D.C. to CAlif.ornia fueled to capacity so that she does not have to make any pit stops.

Thank you Carol for this opportunity to "ramble": to write with many digressions: to stray from the main subject of your being tired to "close to despair" of having your hope that of reading more "local issues" either lost or destroyed. So "close" or near to that, but not yet there yet.  In fact like a roller-coaster, and John Paul Jones, of: I have yet begun to fight! or reply. (;-) Ever watch James Burke's "CONNECTIONS"? (;-) on T.V. I bet you avoid it like the plague. Oh you of liking close alright; as in to merely skim the surface of a subject.  Like a fly on the water ready for that fish. Now pay "close attention": like in the word compact for a close shave, I do deviate therefrom down the other path of the word compact, to an agreement, in like it takes two to tango.  WHERE be this 40USC255 acceptance to our RSA 123:1 offer.  You were not merely a State Rep. who liked to put statutes into law, but what about the fulfillment thereof? To that you look for other news not applicable to these state and federal statutes?  No wonder you retired as you're fed up with not having the statutes mis-used by the powers-that be.  Now what does that say about your preference rather than convictions?  Yeah, you're not under the RSA 92:2 oath anymore, so you wander away.  Just that your pied piper mentality is not for me!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[Tunga]

Jed, nothing you have posted here changes the fact that you are just making things up to fit your own narrow socialistic view of how the American Republic was designed to operate.

Article 1 part 7? NH agrees to US Constitution 1:8:17 where the legislature of the State of NH and the US Congress must agree on who has jurisdiction where. CEDED is the key word that eludes your miniscule mind.

Where is part 2 of Article 95 that you keep blathering on about?

The online version of the NH Constitution has only one part showing. Do you have some kind of "NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER" clearance that allows you access to this hidden (or is it just made up) part of the law?

[Tunga]

Even though title 27 is where most of the crap that allows the BATF to practice it's unlawful acts resides, there is a provision in title 26 that gives them power enforce tax code in failure to file cases.


It shouldn't have any bearing in this case due to the lack of jurisdiction. Title 26 being as it is "Special" or corporate law and not "Positive" law like those enacted by the US Congress that might appear in say, Title 18 Crimes.

It's just one more example of strength through ignorance exhibited by a corrupt judiciary.

[JosephSHaas]

Jed, ...how the American Republic was designed to operate.

Article 1 part 7? NH agrees to US Constitution 1:8:17 where the legislature of the State of NH and the US Congress must agree on who has jurisdiction where. CEDED is the key word that eludes your miniscule mind.

Where is part 2 of Article 95 ...?

Over here: http://www.nh.gov/government/laws.html (click lower right)  to:

http://www.nh.gov/constitution/constitution.html

then: (at bottom of page) http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html

"[Art.] 95. [Incompatibility of Certain Offices.] No person holding the office of judge of any court, (except special judges) secretary, treasurer of the state, attorney-general, register of deeds, sheriff, COLLECTORS OF STATE AND FEDERAL TAXES, members of Congress or any person holding any office under the United States, including any person in active military service, shall at the same time hold the office of governor, or have a seat in the senate, or house of representatives, or council; but his being chosen and appointed to, and accepting the same, shall operate as a resignation of his seat in the chair, senate, or house of representatives, or council; and the place so vacated shall be filled up. No member of the council shall have a seat in the senate or house of representatives." (emphasis ADDed for what looks like there were and are supposed to be #___ collectors OF the State, in the plural, of both State and Federal taxes FOR both governments, the reason being for the latter of to feed "Uncle Sam" only for what he "needs" and when he "wants" more than what the Constitution pre-scribes, then to "Just Say No!" 

Before I started pumping the gasoline to my car at the Seven-Eleven last night in Concord on The Heights I notice the sign that read "Taxes Included", so when I went into the store I asked the man if he could flip the federal tax switch off and he said that there is no way, and later after filling my tank with just over nine gallons I went back for a boating form to amend accordingly to reflect this Art. 12 stuff of us in N.H. not liable for such until the Feds comply with the law of 40USC255 to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 and he said that I had to get that form directly from the D.O.T., and so to visit them later this week with this receipt and a bunch more to combine into like the first half of this year's deductions for a rebate that if they do not pay me, to take to the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims to have them Order that they pay me in September.

cc:

1. The City and State Police for law-enforcement of "To Serve and Pro-tect" doing a lousy job of guarding us FROM the Feds! Yeah I know that the governor does nominate and appoint the general and all field officers of the militia by Article 46, but that our state militia has been blended in WITH the Feds of it being called The NATIONAL Guard, against who but foreign invaders to the State withIN the United States, and aren't the Feds technically trespassers here in N.H. withOUT the required filing?

2. The Town/City of: __________, N.H. for similar action by your Selectmen/ City Council to see to it that your Police Chief do something about this too: law-enforcement!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

I don't understand how their guns factor into this. How does owning guns have anything to do with not paying taxes? I don't understand why they're being told to give up their guns...
________________

Told by who? The Feds? They have no authority to even do that either by the following statute as I did quote from on July 11th '09 @ 9:14 AM currently at page #3 of my Archives here:

""Possession of firearms by a convicted felon", because according to: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/RSA/html/XII/159/159-3.htm "159:3 Convicted Felons. – I. A person IS guilty of a class B felony if he: ...(b) Has been convicted in either a state or federal court in this or any other state...of: ... (3) A felony violation of the laws of ...the United States (and) II. The state SHALL confiscate to the use of the state the weapon or weapons of persons convicted under this section...." (emphasis ADDed.)"

Thus if there is some forfeiture case #____ separate from this criminal case in the federal court, then for the N.H. A.G. to enter a SPECIAL APPEARANCE showing the Feds that they have NO JURISDICTION until their 40USC255 filing to our N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 and to first: turn over the guns to the State of New Hampshire, as an in "rem" of the thing*, and secondly, and most importantly of the life, LIBERTY and property* phrase of to turn over the "res" of Ed & Elaine Brown as "Residents", residing in Dover to the Strafford County Superior Court, as for when he, she or them together (they only meet on Friday mornings to go over the week's paperwork) do file their Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, then set free.

[Kat Kanning]

Joe Hass, you're replying to a mindless spammer.

[JosephSHaas]

Joe Haas, you're replying to a mindless spammer.

I noticed that before I did write what I did, of this being his first posting here ever, but who really has the time to read all the prior posts here into the thousands, but somebody in jail with plenty of time on their hands, but with no access to the internet.  What a shame and like that T.V. commercial: "A Mind is a terrible thing to waste."

I could not find that exact television commercial, but did find: "A Mind is a terrible thing to waste." at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6_ZWz4ZroQ of 8:18 minutes, seen 2,104 times.

He might not be up to our "level" of thinking, and with not enough time to even read the current posts, but landing here on the fly, and so to "trap" him here  like that other slogan of: An Enquiring Mind Want to Know.

Hey! We can use all the soldiers we can get.  Maybe he will be able to do the rifle approach, rather than the shotgun approach, and "Zero" in on this aspect of the case to "nail" these federal bastards with our own state statute on guns, as it seems the Feds AND State put more thought into acquiring property than they do the liberty of their fellow man.  To use this greed by them against them that will result in their downfall.

[JosephSHaas]

Kat: I see that you "swatted" this "fly"!  

Like Obama the other day in the Oval Office.   for that PETA group.

Me:  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mod:

"The Twilight Zone" The Gift (1962)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0734642/

and: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gift_(The_Twilight_Zone) with photo also at: http://www.freebase.com/view/wikipedia/images/en_id/14993009

over to: http://www.cbs.com/classics/the_twilight_zone/video/video.php?cid=649562032&pid=gV2TrEg_HRng9453VyG1kpx5bl5cnmmA&play=true&cc=2

nothing found at youtube, another at: http://www.imdb.com/video/cbs/vi944046105/ but needing that Flash Player 9 crap, or Flash Player 10 of more crap: http://www.joost.com/0945njj/t/The-Twilight-Zone-1-2-hr-The-Gift#

[Kat Kanning]

No mercy!

[John Edward Mercier]

And US Con Art. 1-8-17 is for the 'District' of Colombia or properties to be used for the specific reasons outlined within the context. Unless property in NH is being obtained 'for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings'... it doesn't apply.

In a 'judicial foreclosure', I'm not even sure the federal government takes title to the property...

[Tunga]

In other words the Federal Government can waltz into New Hampshire and take anything and anyone anytime without the need for any kind of Law or in any kind of order?

Just like Nazi Germany?

You really should lay off the paste Jed. It's turning your shirt brown.

[John Edward Mercier]

Only through the powers granted them under NH Constitution Part First Article Seven...

[Tunga]

How does NH Article 7 cede property to the federal government without complying with US Con Article 4 Section 3?
 
"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."

[KBCraig]

How does NH Article 7 cede property to the federal government without complying with US Con Article 4 Section 3?
 
"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress."

That article was nullified when Lincoln illegally created West Virginia in order to give himself more votes.

[JosephSHaas]

And US Con Art. 1-8-17 is for the 'District' of Colombia or properties to be used for the specific reasons outlined within the context. Unless property in NH is being obtained 'for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings'... it doesn't apply.

In a 'judicial foreclosure', I'm not even sure the federal government takes title to the property...

See: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm