Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 33

[Kat Kanning]

When are Ed and Elaine supposed to be sentenced?

[JosephSHaas]

To Kat, and Carol = Fed. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter, http://www.shea-porter.house.gov/ address: 104 Washington Street; Dover, NH 03820; p. (603) 743-4813, f. (603) 743-5956

Thursday, Sept. 3rd is the "tentative"? sentencing day (awaiting word about some Motion to Continue) for Ed & Elaine Brown, #__ days before the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims meets on my case #13 of 2009 there to determine how much of my $5000 claim against the governor he is to pay me for having not http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html Art. 51 "execute(d) the laws of the state and of the United States;" including RSA Ch. 123:1 AGAINST the Feds for to have THEM comply with their own 40USC255 ______________________* for which he, the governor is "responsible for" by Article 41 to have to pay me for the stolen time in having to try to have the Feds obey the law, and then onto the victim claims of Ed & Elaine who have had their caretaker duties stolen from them too of the land that now has a "secure hold" withOUT the A.G.'s "written approval" toward the October 2007 "acqui"sition, since this MUST exist BEFORE he delegates down to the local U.S. Marshals to "secure" the land! Re: my reply of yesterday @ 1:29 AM (see also the Petition for a Writ of Formedon to get these caretakers back to the land, to file in Sullivan County Superior Court in Newport sometime) and BTW the website* for this at  https://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 now shut down with the following words** BELIEVE IT OR NOT! for WHY?  So that others can't refer to it?, or make a copy that I already have and to give to my Federal Rep. Shea-Porter next week in Dover with my "Ticket" to her for operating HER illegal court here, her Art. III, Section 1 "inferior court" of Congress, or Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 9 "Tribunal" with providing the tribune of champion for the people in the title of U.S. Attorney to prosecute the U.S. Codes but where is their "protector" or defender directly out of this same nomination and Senate confirmation process instead of indirectly out of them through another layer of from the inferior court itself? Such is against the victim's "equal rights" as per the Ninth Amendment, and by Obama needs to be "change"d!  especially when our public non-servants here in New Hampshire REFUSE to honor their RSA Ch. 92:2 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm oath of office to Article 84 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html to which they "will support the constitution" including Article 12 in that last sentence, but when? http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html  as the word "will" is "of emphatic futurity" or to definitely take place, but when? It is presumed to be starting right after they do say and/or sign such an oath, like by RSA Ch. 42:1 for town officials http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/III/42/42-1.htm wherein it is written that:  "42:1 Oath Required. – Every town officer shall make and subscribe the oath or declaration as prescribed by part 2, article 84 of the constitution of New Hampshire and any such person who violates said oath after taking the same shall be forthwith dismissed from the office involved." BUT is there really a violation when it remains in the "future" tense" of that they "will" honor the law? when that "point in time" has not been "fixed". And so like an animal that is "fixed", there must be a calling forth of each public servant to be "fixed" too.  Thus for us to appoint a day, time and place for them to affix the time of when their oath is to start, as we have all presumed that they are UNDER an oath of office, but that they are NOT until the happening of this event.  Thus for Ed & Elaine to file a: Motion to affix time of starting of the judge's oath. So again a cc: of this to Shea-Porter to ask her when her inferior officer will be affixing his time BEFORE this September 3rd event, and then if and when he does pronounce sentence other than time served AT THE LEAST and KNOWing that such 40USC255 paperwork is NOT filed and he has no jurisdictional authority, THEN to have him impeached! 

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

**

" www.uscn.net:443 uses an invalid security certificate.

The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certificate is unknown

(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)

OK"

[Kat Kanning]

To Kat,
Thursday, Sept. 3rd is the "tentative"? sentencing day (awaiting word about some Motion to Continue) for Ed & Elaine Brown,

Thanks.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste:

Claim for your "inferior" officer to affix his time.?
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Sat 7/25/09 1:00 PM
To:    olga.clough at mail.house.gov
Cc:    a.colarusso at ci.dover.nh.us; s.myers at dover.nh.gov; d.lynch at ci.dover.nh.us; editor at dovercitynews.net

Olga,

Would you please set a day, time and place: like maybe in your Dover office on ______day, August ____, 2009 @ __:__ o'clock a.m./p.m. for your "inferior court" of Congress officer of this judge to affix THAT time as for when he shall START his "honor" of the oath he signed, and please provide me with BOTH documents, or the one document as amended to reflect that this "future" tense of "will" has now become activated in the present or current tense, and invite me to such an event as a witness, because if he/ George Z. Singal from Portland, Maine doesn't do this like within the twenty (20) business days akin to F.O.I.A. from this Monday, July 27th when you officially get this in your Dover office, thus by Monday, August 24th @ 12:00 o'clock high noon, giving you a few extra hours, then there will be a definite default of this state-fed relations for which NOT only our governor will be responsible too, getting a copy of this delivered by me to his office there on Monday for to set up a day, time and place in an Article 14 "prompt" manner to set within the like "Fast Day" of old within 24 hours for some day, time and place to answer like by RSA Ch. 91-A to occur within ten (10) days thereof, and so by August 6th @ __:__ o'clock a.m./p.m. BUT that your boss, Fed. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter will have to answer to too, because your U.S. Codes are NOT to be "controllable" over us inhabitants here, per our Art. 12 N.H. Bill of Rights, there being no such 40USC255 federal filing to our N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution, and if I do not have confirmation within 24 hours by you too as having set up a day/time and place for such "affixing" , and so there being no reply from you with these details by 10:00 a.m. on July 28th, that my plan right now is to file that $5000 ticket against your boss in the Dover District Court on Wed., July 29th or shortly thereafter, since if the authorities can ticket us by statute, we ought to be able to ticket them by the Constitution!

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

Here's a copy and paste of what I did just post as Reply #8887 at page 593 (actually my post #2106 there) of this New Hampshire Underground:

cc: Anthony F. Colarusso, Jr., Chief of Police, POLICE DEPARTMENT, 46 Locust Street, Dover, New Hampshire 03820-3783, 603: 742-4646 Email: a.colarusso at ci dot dover.nh.us for to please enforce the law of Art. 12 last sentence, N.H. Bill of Rights in your City too, as to check to see if the admitting papers of my friend Ed Brown and his wife Elaine are in proper order, __________ yes or no, and if not, then to charge the keepers thereof this victim with kidnapping because "ignorance of the law is no excuse", them in the KNOW now in a culpable mental state to try to withstand such a criminal charge, or at least sign onto any Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to be written up by these victims with the co-endorsement(s) of the Superintendent, Warren Dowaliby, and/or Sheriff Wayne Estes to seek a "second opinion" from the judge on duty there of Judge _________ in the Strafford County Superior Court to grant such a claim, as the Feds being in violation of BOTH U.S. and State Constitutions and statutes, or what is referred to as falling on all fours as the legs to their table is not only wobbly but has collapsed!

P.S. This be after the City Tax Collector, by approval of a legal opinion from the City Solicitor there does send a Property Tax bill to the G.S.A. agent as landlord of the U.S. Post Office for this over $47,000 in taxes billed for their RSA Ch. 123:2 building there since only the land is tax-exempt. So cc: also to: (2) The Mayor S. Myers as Chairman of this City Council, to please promptly forward a copy of this e-mail onto all of your council members, and (3) Daniel R. Lynch, Finance Director/Treasurer, 288 Central Avenue, Dover, N.H. 03820-4169 http://www.ci.dover.nh.us/ "DOVER: First in New Hampshire, First with You!" but is it!? Oh Really? (;-) plus (4) The Editor at http://dovercitynews.net/ "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090724/OPINION/907240311

entitled: "J.D.: "Happy Trails" in your "Golden Years." "

of: "

Re: paragraph #2 of 4: "For the $9,800 per year taxpayers paid him Colcord treated the position as a full-time job." (that's a letter l replacement for the n-letter typo).

Oh really? .............................................. you thought I meant him not working so hard eh? (;-) No, not that but: J.D.: as former State Trooper & Retired State Rep. Dick Marple of Hookset, and who was a  Member of the Merrimack County Delegation would say to you: When are you really going to get paid? (;-) The almost $10,000 per year you took in "greenbacks"? Them's jest note-paypas. Like Clara Pella for WENDY'S and her: "Where's The Beef?" TV commercials, you ought to be saying: Where's the money? The Article 15 just compensation of "lawful money" you were supposed to get as a State Rep. too! Put your foot down. You know that FRNs or a "note" is a promise to pay (like a check is an order to pay), so WHEN are you going to get paid? You mean you accepted these Commerce coins from the Coinage Act of 1965 of the sandwich metal variety over the Constitutional coin of quality per the Coinage Act of 1792 and as annotated in our own Art. 97, N.H. Constitution, Part Second; http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html See also Chapter 28 Laws of N.H. of 1794 (Vol. 6 @ page 155), and Ch. 7, Laws of N.H. for 1793 (page 109) "for settling the depreciation of the paper currency"; in that we are NOT supposed to have Fiat money!

Hey J.D.: like I said before: See you at the "Warner Fall Foliage Festival" this October  http://www.wfff.org/ and I'll treat you to some "cidda" (;-) Then we can talk about WHO in the race for U.S. Senate can put THEIR foot down on WHO in the U.S. Treasury is NOT accepting these private gold shipments of bullion per Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, not for the "gold standard" but for bullion to be sold to buy the silver to be melted down to make the U.S. Yankee dollar, as a dollar IS defined as so many ounces of silver, either by fine or standard weight.

I find it amazing that for a government official who you knew or should have known that your County Treasurer was supposed to keep their books in the Money of Account of The United States, by Section 20 of The Coinage Act of 1792, http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/coinage1792.txt  that you accepted debased coins of copper, nickel and zinc!? Are we to congratulate you for your stupidity? (;-) Wise up.  And like I said: IOU a cider. No modern day "tea party", but to make it a "sour" event with vinegar to disagree with the powers that-be against us, but who are supposed to be working for us, by "The Rule of Law", and so to take THEIR "Bad-tempered" denials of to 12USC411 redeem these notes to the Banking Commissioner for when they are a state-charted bank, and get your retirement into that temper of the dis-position stage of an outburst of rage: to say: I've had enough of these sandwich coins, I'm not going to take it any more! These are my "golden" years!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090726/OPINION/907260337

entitled: "The Browns are political prisoners (by) Daniel J. Riley, Boscawen"

of:

"For the Monitor
July 26, 2009 - 12:00 am

One must inquire why the government just didn't just show the law that made Ed and Elaine Brown liable for the voluntary income tax to avoid the expense and danger of a standoff. I say "voluntary" because the IRS's own literature informs you the income tax is based on voluntary compliance. No bureaucrat will ever assess your income; you do it yourself, voluntarily, waiving your Fifth Amendment right when you sign that 1040.

The 1040 instruction booklet, the Paper Reduction Act Notice and Privacy Act Notice all tell you that you only have to pay taxes you are liable for. Well, 26 U.S.C. 4404, 5505, 4786 are the liability clauses for tobacco, alcohol and wagering taxes. Where is the liability clause for the income tax? That's what the Browns respectfully asked for over and over, only to be shown the barrel of a gun.

The Browns didn't want to voluntarily waive their rights, but instead stood on them. They were willing to pay every penny, as soon as they were shown the law that made them liable. The Browns paid all their other taxes.

The people have a right to ask questions and get answers. This is found in the First Amendment. A maxim of law is "no answers - no taxes." It's the people's way to peacefully control an out-of-control government.

The Browns were justified and are now political prisoners.

DANIEL J. RILEY

Boscawen

(The writer was sentenced to 36 years in federal prison last fall for building bombs and bringing guns to the Browns at their home in Plainfield.)

This article is: 0 days old. "

[John Edward Mercier]

The 18th amendment has not been stricken... simply amended by the 21st.
The same way the 16th amendment simply amended 1:8:1
'but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;.
Duties, imposts, and exicises are still uniform throughout the United States.

Income Jed. Define it with the code or go home.

Several parts of the 'code' define income such as this one... 26 U.S.C.61

[John Edward Mercier]

how about this one jed?

title 26 cfr sec 312-6b. yes it deals with corporate taxes but!..........

"(b) Among the items entering into the computation of corporate
earnings and profits for a particular period are all income exempted by
statute, income not taxable by the Federal Government under the
Constitution, as well as all items includible in gross income under
section 61 or corresponding provisions of prior revenue acts."

so if their own interpretation of the code (federal regulations) says that there is an income that is not taxable under the constitution i leave you the question, what income isnt taxable under the constitution?????

Non-profit religious and other fraternal corporations acting under the First Amendment. Its written into the code under 501c.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/88440/68422

entitled: "It's a "Protection Racket" / a State-Fed R.I.C.O."

of:

"They paid their local property taxes for that Article 12 "protection" http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html of: "Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." [ no 40 USC 255 federal filing to N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm  ] but didn't realize that the Town* Selectmen of Plainfield http://www.plainfieldnh.org/ and Sullivan County Commissioners  plus Sheriff & County Attorney http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/ plus Dept. of Safety http://www.nh.gov/safety/ were part of this State-Fed Relations "Protection Racket", as an Art. 28-a political subdivision* of the State. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H25

To protect as the "honor guard"** that the "will"*** support the Constitutions of the United States and the state, as indicated in their RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm to Article 84 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html shall forever mean that of the "future" tense*** never to appoint a day and time for it to start the "hereby" word, and so these public servants working for themselves and not of "honor"** to us! Thus they have not dis-honored their oath, because it has never become effective.

Did the jury or any of them even ask if the defendant(s) ever challenged the jurisdiction of the court or oath of office of the judge, not only in words, but of starting time? Yesterday I did write to my Federal Rep. and theirs too of Carol Shea-Porter in Dover to invite this Portland, Maine judge to an official ceremony at her office there to make it official, and so then when sentencing time arrives on Thu., Sept. 3rd there can be one result: time-served, since to continue their incarceration to be "correct"ed at an F.C.I. would be a waste of tax-payer money because they are already correct in that the court had and still has no jurisdiction, and if the judge acts to deviate from Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution to allow a non-consent to continue, two wrongs do NOT make a right and so he SHALL be impeached! and the President, by Art. II, Sec. 2, clause 1 U.S. Constitution to first issue a "Reprieve" and then to Commute or Pardon the offenders of nothing, as there is no Enforcement Clause in the 16th Amendment. The proof of federal non-filing having over-ridden this militant action.  Look up from from where that word is derived from the word militate: to use force as evidence. So WHO really is the "outlaw" here but our very own governments!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/88440/68426

entitled: "The Sheeple need this "Wake Up" call."

of:

"There is NO "duty (or requirement, or obligation) to pay taxes" UNLESS you decide that the "lay" word in the phrase in the 16th Amendment of "to lay and collect" means to impose as in to levy or collect. For me I stay away from such George Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty Four" and "Doublespeak" of to collect and collect, by choosing the apply part of the definition of the word lay, of to mean a request, and say to the I.R.S.: request DENIED! (;-) I choose NOT to "volunteer". If you choose it as your duty or compulsion to such an obligation, that is your prerogative, not mine, because I furthermore know that even if I did pay x and they still wanted more in y, there is no z Enforcement Clause, as in the surrounding Amendments.  Check it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[JosephSHaas]

I called Gary D. on Thursday to see Ed today, but when I called 742-3310 at the jail it was: no, you're not on his list, as he sees no visitors today!

In the meantime I found this video of the Candia Horse COP:

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090726/NEWS01/907260343&template=page3

entitled: "...And shade for their horses."

of:

"A.) RE: "One Free Stater spent 58 days in jail after filming in a courthouse lobby and refusing to give police his name. Behind bars, he preached the message of less government to fellow inmates."

See:

1. "NH: Court threatens "non-standers" 1/3" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZIBIgZK4g8&feature=channel of 8:18 minutes with 6,400 views.

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oE4qCcHBRw&feature=related 6:30 min.  2,698 views.

3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwBTgvlkoao&feature=channel 5:18 min. 2,084 views.

Result: "NH: Govt. releases Ian Freeman 3 days into 90 day sentence" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlZSQzJsmyc&feature=channel OF 0:51 seconds 2,457 views.

B.) While re-searching for the above at GOOGLE, that I've seen before, here's a new one for me:

1. "NH cop kidnaps Free Stater for camcording - 1/2" after the Candia COP was told by the SPCA man that they've got to go get a Search Warrant, since the caretakers (Beth* and Cooper Travis)  for the owner (Brian Travis, their Dad**), who works in MAss. and was not there then at that point in time, will not allow them to tread upon the property over the rim to see if they have that open shelter for the horses. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sHM3c-r8Oo&feature=channel of 7:50 min. 17,782 views;

2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkA6hpfhBZ4&feature=channel of 9:15 min. 10,688 views **(their names not given to the COP who tells them that he knows the owner well, as implying for years, when they've only been there for 7 months to this Nov. 4, 2008 incident, and their Dad saying later that he does NOT know this COP! who lied!!)

* who says: :"Okey Dokey" http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/264800.html (;-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/88440/68449

entitled: "Get out of the quicksand* before it's too late!"

of:

"...actually slow-sand, as in that "stealthy encroachment" as warned about by the U.S. Supreme Court judges in that Vol. 116 case in the U.S. Reports ______ (18__) * "Quicksand scene (The Jungle Book)" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiOUJGCC_ro of 1:34 minute 32,655 views.

"Gunsmoke: A Scene You Won't Expect!!!!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIbGXR9IPvc&NR=1 of 0:25 seconds, 13,676 views. ""Doggone it! I told Matt to lay off drinking beers before lunch over at the Longbranch...save the suds for late afternoon when things quieted down a spell in town. Beers in the morning will only slow you down. But did he ever? listen to me?? Nope." -- - - Doc" . . . . . . . now replace the words: "drinking beers" with: lay off: NOT filing those 40USC255 papers with the N.H. Secretary of State by RSA Ch. 123:1 until AFTER lunch, as in to "post-pone", do NOT save those papers until there is an uproar! first by like the miner's canary who smells trouble brewing (as in pollution), and then hopefully not too late for the rest who finally wake up to the truth! and do something about it!

Pollution: NOT contempt OF court, BUT a court that is the contamination** TO constitution, with its kangaroo crap that is piling up "pretty" high these days! And it's not a "pretty" sight! (;-) "The Crying Indian Commercial" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4ozVMxzNAA for "Iron Eyes Cody" of 0:29 seconds with 161,554 views so far. "The Crying Indian - full commercial - Keep America Beautiful" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7OHG7tHrNM of 1:00 minute with 57,056 views.

** the mixture of lies with the truth.

As for the systematic annihilation or dis-appearance by transportation of the truth-giver to without the district when there be no complaint by the masses to the law in 18USC3232 like for dragging them over to Portland, Maine withOUT yet another consent, two wrongs of no consent by 40USC255 to NH 123:1 nor by 18USC3232 do NOT make a right, then to right the wrong, the Federal Rep for the masses AND individual, or in other words: for both the pie and any one slice thereof, to see to it that their Art. III, Sec. 1 "inferior Court" judge of Congress finally activate their oath, but if not, then instead of the particle and anti-particle, such as an electron and a positron to disappear with a resulting release of energy, or "high" as in evil relishing in its evil, then to evict the evil by impeachment!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste of her reply:


"RE: State-Fed action needed on this "will" word.?
From:    Clough, Olga (Olga.Clough at mail.house.gov)
Sent:    Sun 7/26/09 10:33 AM
To:    Joseph S. Haas Jr. (josephshaasjr at hotmail.com)

Mr. Haas;

Please understand that you must direct all your questions and concerns to our Chief of Staff, Mr. Mike Brown, in our Washington, D.C. office and any future correspondence, including e-mail, must be directed to the same.  No other staff member is authorized to discuss your concerns.  Should you decide to visit one of the district offices we will attempt to contact Mr. Brown on your behalf and arrange for a phone conference.  Thank you for your understanding.

Olga Clough

Director of Constituent Services

Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter

104 Washington Street

Dover, NH 03820

Phone: 603-743-4813

Fax: 603-743-5956



From: Joseph S. Haas Jr. [mailto:josephshaasjr at hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 9:17 AM
To: mike.rollo at leg.state.nh.us; pgmffat at comcast.net; sarah.hutz at unh.edu; baldwindomingo at yahoo.com; cynthiapsweeney at yahoo.com; valerie.hardy at leg.state.nh.us; jtwo101588 at aol.com; frank.emiro at leg.state.nh.us; todd.smith at leg.state.nh.us; kris-e-roberts at live.com; georgekatsiantonis at hotmail.com; thomaskatsiantonis at gmail.com; dennis.fields at leg.state.nh.us; alexis.chininis at gmail.com; mbaldasaro at comcast.net; lars at taybre.net
Cc: ~housestate-federalrelationsandveteransaffairs at leg.state.nh.us; Joe Haas; s.myers at dover.nh.gov; a.colarusso at ci.dover.nh.us; d.lynch at ci.dover.nh.us; Clough, Olga; editor at dovercitynews.net
Subject: State-Fed action needed on this "will" word.


To: all members of this State-Federal Relations Committee of the House

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H25

You are encouraged to reply to this http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090726/OPINION/907260337

My presumption is that you have access to the internet and can read this, rather than just an e-mail reader, but if only the latter, please so advise me and I can copy and paste this letter to the editor and of the replies so far, of which I have commented to two and send it to you.

My request to you is that if you're interested in doing what's right, you will reply to me that yes: you will see to it that Federal Rep. Carol Shea-Porter be THE one to take this "will" word of the "future" tense in the oath to that of a present tense, at either her Dover or Manchester office.

Please call Olga at the Dover office who has some of the papers in regards to this getting a copy too.

Thank you in advance, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone) e-mail: (also at): JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

cc: The Mayor of Dover for him and The Council plus The Police Chief, and The Editor of the http://dovercitynews.net "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/88440/68485

entitled: "Time for the Darkness to end, and see The (green*)  Light."

of:

"Abe: You're missing a few "pebbles".

• Not marbles. (;-) There is no con-fusion [?] or jumble of a dis-orderly manner when you [and the Feds who have gone a-stray: "to wander** BEYOND established LIMITS; roam***" (emphasis ADDed)] do get back to the source of WHAT our creature the Fed is supposed to do as its first act of wanting to do business with one of its 50 creators here in "The Granite State" of New Hampshire. Thus to un-mix the truth from the lies, or in other words if and when you find it, but that you have got to start looking for it first. To con-found? No, to find. to per-plex? No, to plex (;-) as in not to puz-zle, but to zul. No way? No, way. (;-) as the Zulu way of doing things, right? "Zulu - Final Attack" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1csr0dxalpI of 4:55 minutes 448,358 You can hear both sides singing, but are supposed to pick one. re: "the warlike and superior branch of the Kafir race, of southeastern Africa, dwelling in Zululand (Natal) and regions north of it"; also: "the great Bantu nation of South Africa, occupying the coastal region between Natal and Lourenco Marques."
  
  So you might think wick-ed? No, try Wick-field as in Agnes Wickfield, "In Dickens' 'David Copperfield,' a young woman of admirable character who becomes David's second wife." reference: The CENTURY DICTIONARY. http://mural.uv.es/beblas/Agnes%20Wickfield.html as his "confessor", see in relation to this: "The Seeker" and his "Confessor" over at: "The Legend of the Seeker" http://www.legendoftheseeker.com/ "HOPE HAS A NEW WARRIOR". http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844653/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18Wb2yAUddg of 0:50 seconds 249,758 views; see also the green light* over at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYuNvus-0-M of 8:28 minutes 65,481 views.
  
  *** Roam and board.  Yeah, you heard me right, you Federalies who like to give FCI attendance of free room and board to those who question not your "purpose" as we all know that it is to obey the law, but for when you do move or travel withOUT the "purpose" on some OTHER plan of an intentional deviation from the "Rule of Law" to that of militant action, from the word militate of to use force as evidence. Your intention or desire to determine a resolution OTHER than what you have been programed for, does NOT give you the power to perform or accomplish something else.  You must get back into your cage with the bars of the constitution! And so are not relieved of the original command. There is no resolve for you to make a decision.  THE decision has already been made: Do you job in a DIRECT (not indirect**) route to the N.H. Office of Secretary of State (to file those 40USC255 papers by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1) or be fired! To get the board for your roaming: the public stocks!
  
  
• kung fu http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iaamkUEF_A of 2:47 min., 484,068 views; see also: "Kung Fu - grasshopper dialog" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCyJRXvPNRo&feature=related of 1:41 minute 126,334 views (+/or listen-ings).     
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU "