Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 33

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090730/FRONTPAGE/907300311

entitled and of:

"Put a lien against the federal gas tax money. (IOUs)
New By JosephSHaas on Fri, 07/31/2009 - 12:01

Where to get the make-up money? By putting a lien on the federal gas tax, until the Feds file their 40USC255 papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State per RSA Ch. 123:1. Then WHEN they do, to not be in-order until the three years of unlawfully collected revenue is either paid back or offset by RSA Ch. 508:4. (;-) Yeah!

Otherwise we'll have to do like what the "Governator" is doing in CAlif.: of to issue Scrip until the sunny days ahead can pay them off. See "Cash-Strapped California IOUs: Just the Latest Sub for Dollars" by Stephanie Simon in The WALL STREET JOURNAL, Sat/Sun., July 25-26, 2009, Vol. CCLIV, No. 21 @ pages A1+A10.

See: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124846739587579877.html

cc: stephanie dot simon at wsj dot com "

Mod: The RSA should be 508:4 (not 504:4).

[Tunga]

grolled,

collecting pay for services rendered is a right known as Liberty.

Working for the Federal Government is not a right but a privilege. An excise tax can only be levied on a corporate entity. The government incorporated itself sometime in the early 1800's? Employees are considered taxable entities. When you sign a w4 you are claiming to be an "employee" which is defined in the Tax code as someone who works for the federal US Government.

[JosephSHaas]

Re: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090801/NEWS01/908010371

entitled: "This is a trespass penalty, not for "theft".

of:

"Here we go again, more attorney triple-talk for that "treble" damages from their (Henry Campbell) "Black's Law Dictionary". 

The REAL penalty should be as per Public Law 97-280 (96 Statute 1211) of October 4, 1982 = The Year of The Bible for 1983 and beyond. But that most public servants do deviate from what is even pre-scribed in the "Rule of Law" written by their own predecessors.  How can we expect them to obey THE law!?

In New Hampshire it's spelled out in the RSA Ch. 651:63 Restitution statute http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/651/651-63.htm that cites the State v. Flemming case of 1984 that cites one case to another that cites "Blackstone's Commentaries" that in turn cites Proverbs 6:30-31 in the Bible for to charge the thief sevenfold (x 7) the amount stolen; not this five oxen for an ox taken in another book, chapter and verse of Exodus 22:1 that has it in there too of four sheep for a sheep, and so somebody must have thought up of three then for an inanimate object?

This is what I call straight-jacket injustice by the other two branches of government telling the judges what to dish out for a sentence.  To dis-obey THE law.  Where do they go to church? Some satanic church of the devil? Shame on them. Wise up! Hopefully for some judge to put the hammer down on the next rocks thief* to the seventh degree to in effect tell the governor and these legislative low-life's that their statute is un-constitutional.  Dare them to try to impeach him or her for their judgment, especially when some victim might see the light as they say, and try to repay 7x the amount, and what? the government to refuse to take the 4x extra because they cannot assert their Art. 5, N.H. Religious right to make the wrong right, the statute having over-ridden the law!?

No, not really, because this HB 70 of 2009 into RSA Ch. 539:4 is under the trespass statute, not the theft* statute, but that it IS theft, and THE penalty is 7 times, and so to the first judge who gets such a case, my Art. 8 "instruction" is that they make it a 3+4=7 for Art. 14 "complete" justice! (;-) Yeah!  See: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HB0070.html "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090801/FRONTPAGE/908010365&template=page2

entitled: "For to join:  the Garage and Yard Sale crowd?

of:

"Maybe he's planning to have some Garage or Yard Sales of his extra books? and this a better location for more traffic/ customers?

Yeah! Like before buying a book, to haggle over the price because of the content of the book written by whoever before they became more famous, and that older edition not updated with the latest info, even though a hard cover, numbered and so a limited first edition, with dust jacket and signed. (;-)

And where does he get some of these books? See you over at BORDERS in Concord again. Maybe to have some book-signings there of your own book?  Like about Article 10-N.H. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html  and Thomas Jefferson: your favorite author I've read before, especially over at:

see: http://wiki.monticello.org/mediawiki/index.php/Tree_of_liberty  to which I do quote of: "They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.[1] The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty.") "

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Outgoing+officials%3A+'Gangs%2C+guns'+growing&articleId=8be9cddf-8c82-46db-a722-e9895c9c466c

Outgoing officials: 'Gangs, guns' growing
By KATHRYN MARCHOCKI
New Hampshire Union Leader Staff
10 hours, 48 minutes ago
CONCORD – New Hampshire's top** federal law enforcers say their successors should expect to see ...
Colantuono and Monier were appointed to their posts by former President George W. Bush in 2002. Both remain in holdover status until their successors are nominated and confirmed. Colantuono, 57, said he has almost finalized his future plans and expects to leave office in late winter or early spring. Monier, 56, a former Goffstown police chief, said he is beginning to explore his options, noting his position generally takes longer to fill.*
...
Monier engineered*** the peaceful end to the standoff in 2007 while federal prosecutors successfully prosecuted the Browns and four of their supporters. The case against the Browns remains open.
"They turned it into more than just a tax case and the investigation is continuing," Monier said.
Threats against judiciary
Looking ahead, Monier warns of increased threats against members of the judiciary, which the Marshal's office is charged with protecting, and increased use of the Internet to commit crimes from ....

* Don't believe the B.S. that this Coluantuno-crap will smell there until March 2010 and Monier will monkey around till AFTER that!  The U.S. Senate Conformation hearings open to a Public Hearing can occur this Summer or Fall.

** These goons are not "top" and are not "law enforcement" officers, but low-life outlaws!

***So Katheryn: if Monier "engineered" this, was that accomplished by skillful acts or contrivance****?

**** contrive: to fabricate = to make up ( a deception )...that they have jurisdictional authority here. No 40 USC 255 filing to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1.  When are they going to comply with the law!?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Incident Report of outlaw activity by County-State goons at the Strafford County Jail in Dover this morning.

Upon my arrival there I saw Bernie going into see Ed first and then Elaine, and waved to him and we briefly talked, and the black guard told me that I was on his visiting list and can go in too, but that I had to go back to my car for my I.D., but that when I returned he said that the fine print reads that I was suspended, and to call the Marshals Office for approval.

So I called Chief Deputy Marshal Gary DiMartino and left a voice recording, went down the stairs in the other building to try to see the Sgt. Bracket, but saw Officer Fortier instead, then left to walk clockwise around the place, reaching Gary who said to call the office tomorrow to talk, but WHERE? I told him I will NOT set foot on Federal soil, so Reme's? He said: call tomorrow. 

I then went back to the visiting gate to try to see Bernie in-between visits, but didn't as I was told to leave, and outside started writing down the names on the metal plaque outside, getting to Rep. Hofeman, who I had talked to before, but a waste of time, calling him to waste more time, him telling me to call my own State Rep. even AFTER I told him that I have a 6th Amendment Counsel form signed by Ed & Elaine, and would he please read the last sentence of Art. 12.

Sgt. Bracket did meet with me either before or after this phone call, sorry I did not keep exact notes, as he said he saw me walk around the place (on their cameras?), and is just following orders of the Super. Dowaliby, who I told him I have a Writ to sue him, who can plead Respondeat Superior to his bosses: the County Commissioners who I did also see and asserted SAME Art. 12 rights, but that they told me to "call Gary". So I called Gary AGAIN leaving a message that I've had enough of this crap! This was when I started and did complete my walk around the place counter-clockwise. 

Tomorrow my plan is to call Shea-Porter's office, or visit there and find out when THIS week she will either have the name of that 40USC255 officer who is supposed to be filing these papers and DO it! or let me in to see my friend as either a regular visitor or counsel because the denial is a DENIAL of my rights for WHAT-ever reason, the Marshals don't even have the right to ASK me questions, let along grab a hold of Ed and Elaine!

To give Shea-Porter a Ticket for $5,000 for operating an illegal court, and maybe have as co-defendants the three County Commissioners for illegally contracting with the Feds! elevating that to an outlaw factor AGAINST my right NOT to be put under such as by the guarantee in Art. 12 of our Bill of Rights!

Yours truly, -- Joe

P.S. I just called Chairman George Maglaras at his office # http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=George%27s+Marina+Dover+%22New+Hampshire%22&fb=1&split=1&gl=us&view=text&latlng=7136379861915497004  742-9089 and left a stern message that unless this shit stops, he http://www.co.strafford.nh.us/commisioners_home.aspx will be included in my lawsuit on Thursday or Friday against him and the other two goons* for violation of my counsel rights as supposed to be a guarantee by the 6th Amendment U.S. to NOT be subject to any other laws (U.S. Codes, etc. from Federal goons) per Art. 12 N.H. I drove by the place http://www.dovernh.org/Pages/GeorgesMarina.htm this afternoon on my way out of the city.

* Including that Paul J. Dumont puffer who REFUSED to open his booklet on the N.H. Constitution when I told him to, on Thu., July 16th at the Meeting, instead being a deviant! saying: call Gary. Repeated by Sheriff Wayne Estes: Call Gary, so I called Gary three different days now on Thu., July 23 recording, and Thursday, July 30th follow-up recording, and now today of talking with him in-between two more recordings. http://www.co.strafford.nh.us/Campground.aspx 742-1458 press * press letters Dumont, then press 1 to where I got some recording to call 7100 or I left him a recording to correct this MTW or Thursday of Friday he and the other two plus Shea-Porter WILL be sued!

** Robert J. Watson same # but goes over to a Ron Shagnon to where I left recording #3. Adding the info of to see the City Council again on Wed., Aug. 12 to have them look into another part of this federal get-away (as in their gotten away so far of TOTAL tax exemption when by RSA 123:2 it is ONLY supposed to be for the land!, re: the P.O. there, for the City Tax Collector to send them a bill for over $47,000.)

[JosephSHaas]

Time for the Sheriff to do his job of law-enforcement in this county!

3 Commissioners: we "will" (future tense) honor the constitution of New Hampshire;

Sheriff: WHEN? Time to "carrot"  by the will word to mark it so that "I do hereby" honor.

NOW!  Article 12 spells it out that I will not be controlled by any other laws than what the Legislature does "consent" to.

Sheriff Wayne Estes. It is up to you to put your foot down on this Commissioner crap and I do mean now! So be it, or else you are a worthless piece of shit deserving no pay for this week starting tomorrow unless you see to it that the law be enforced there!

When do you get paid? On Fridays?  Then do it! Stop moping around as if there is no variance or deviance from the law!  These Three Commissions must be dealt with now!  No court dragged out sloooooooow-ness to have to PAY for justice!  Article 14 reads that such be "free" but the judiciary by the lousy legislators who put statutes in to smother the truth.  There shall be no FILING FEE!

To read Sheriff Mack's book, and maybe give you or loan you a copy, or you to call him about what? That you're a baby needing to be taught what the Academy did not teach you!?  What a waste of taxpayer money!

If you will not do your job, then you have no shine to your badge, but that it has tarnished; it has become rusted.  Then if you choose to rust then so be it.  May your joints de-compose so that you're like the tin man in The Wizard of Oz, needing the oil, but your own voice and thoughts causing your own destruction!

This I do petition to God Almighty in the morning that you be warned about doing what is right, or else by whatever power He has to convince you otherwise, like in to become useless for your useless non-way of being a non-law- enforcer, that you succumb to your own non-undertakings to realize that NOW is the time for action!

So be it, amen.

[JosephSHaas]

He's supposed to get there by 8:00 a.m. (742-4960).

Will he do what's right in a "prompt" manner by 12:00 noon?

To call him sometime in the morning about today's incident of the royal run-around at the jail and so for a "progress report" from him on how and when to straighten out these deviants!

I'll give you 'all here the second progress report.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mod: A break in an oath deserves a break down!

The situation here is as I've explained before after getting that letter from Danny about these Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 9 "Tribunals" from the word tribune and of a Champion or Defender, and so when applied to the County, who is the Defender?  The County Attorney defends his corrupt buddies there of the three Commissioners gagging on their oaths as being deviant therefrom.  Thus the Champion for We the People is the Sheriff to enforce the law, and in this case my 6th Amendment right to "counsel" against any unlawful blocks by the Feds who have NO control over me because of their Federal failure to file their 40USC255 consent by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1.

Now here's a story from the Bible of when Moses' sister put up a block in telling Moses not to marry that black woman.  What did God do to her? Was allow her wish to be that of an all-white-ness, of her turning whiter than a leaper. So the same goes with this Sheriff: I wish him the best, but when he does the worse, then so be it to allow public corruption to continue to him too, and be as decrepit as he wants to be.  If he will not be strong for us, then to go the other extreme of to be weakened by some illness brought upon himself. A break in an oath deserves a break-down! I tried to build a bridge between us, but he refuses.  Then so be it that he learn a lesson the hard way.

Again I repeat: A break in an oath deserves a break-down!

Bottom line: do your job, or I will do it for you; re: to: (1) file RSA Ch. 643:1 Official Oppression  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm charges of this control over me by the Feds being allowed to unlawfully continue against all three of these County Commissioners, and; (2) a criminal trespass charge against Shea-Porter, because as I've learned from what I've read before of when this 40USC255 paperwork does not exist, then the Fed activities beyond their soil there as with a proprietary interest is trespass!

[JosephSHaas]

        

                           

                     

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/lix/594/594-14.htm

TITLE LIX
PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
CHAPTER 594
ARRESTS IN CRIMINAL CASES
Arrest
Section 594:14
    594:14 Summons Instead of Arrest. –
    I. In any case in which it is lawful for a peace officer to arrest without a warrant a person for a misdemeanor or violation, he may instead issue to him in hand a written summons in substantially the following form:

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

To ...........................................................................
You are hereby notified to appear before the .......... district (municipal) court of the State of New Hampshire, to be holden on the .......... day of .......... 19 .......... at .......... o'clock in the forenoon (afternoon) to answer to a complaint (to be filed in said court) charging you with .......... in violation of the laws of the State of New Hampshire.
Hereof fail not, as you will answer your default under the penalty of the law in that behalf made and provided.

Dated at
...........................................................................

the ... day of ... 19..

  Name
...........................................................................
Title

    Upon failure to appear, a warrant of arrest may issue. Any person who fails to appear in answer to such summons shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
    II. A summons may be issued after an arrest for a misdemeanor or violation in lieu of bail.

Source. 1941, 163:9. RL 423:28. RSA 594:14. 1965, 38:1. 1977, 588:11. 1983, 347:1, eff. Aug. 17, 1983.

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/lix/594/594-14.htm

TITLE LIX
PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
CHAPTER 594
ARRESTS IN CRIMINAL CASES
Arrest
Section 594:14
    594:14 Summons Instead of Arrest. –
    I. In any case in which it is lawful for a peace officer to arrest without a warrant a person for a misdemeanor or violation, he may instead issue to him in hand a written summons in substantially the following form:

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

To ...........................................................................
You are hereby notified to appear before the .......... district (municipal) court of the State of New Hampshire, to be holden on the .......... day of .......... 19 .......... at .......... o'clock in the forenoon (afternoon) to answer to a complaint (to be filed in said court) charging you with .......... in violation of the laws of the State of New Hampshire.
Hereof fail not, as you will answer your default under the penalty of the law in that behalf made and provided.

Dated at
...........................................................................

the ... day of ... 19..

  Name
...........................................................................
Title

    Upon failure to appear, a warrant of arrest may issue. Any person who fails to appear in answer to such summons shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
    II. A summons may be issued after an arrest for a misdemeanor or violation in lieu of bail.

Source. 1941, 163:9. RL 423:28. RSA 594:14. 1965, 38:1. 1977, 588:11. 1983, 347:1, eff. Aug. 17, 1983.

Plus to add in the words: "against the peace and dignity of the state" reference: Article 88, N.H. at: http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html

To double-space my Criminal Complaint as notarized and present to the Dover District Court:

COMPLAINT AGAINST: All three of the Strafford County Commissioners: George Maglaras, Paul J. Dumont, and Robert J. Watson

On Thursday July 16th, 2009 I did meet with the Commissioners at their office at about 10:30 a.m. and did ask them to please allow me to assert my right of counsel to my friend Ed Brown in the Dover Jail. My right as is supposed to be a guarantee by the Ninth Amendment to the party's counsel right by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, since as they say: it takes two to tango; to speak and hear; write and read; both for "complete" justice by Article 14, N.H.

When I told them to read the last sentence of Article 12 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights, that is when Dumont protested and the rest concurred that I "suck up" to the Feds in making a request to the Marshals to be allowed to see THEIR prisoner. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html

I told them that I do not like this buckling UNDER to the Feds since they be out-of-order in having filed no 40USC255 papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State as required by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 but to see what happens or does NOT happen I will do what they say. [ See   https://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=393575  and http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm plus: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm for both section 1 dealing with the land and building, and section 2 property tax exemption ONLY for the "land", me currently trying to get the Tax Collectors in both Concord and Dover to send them a bill.

And so I did call on the following Thursday, July 23rd leaving a voice mail and spoke with Chief Deputy Gary DiMartino finally yesterday morning when I was at the jail trying to visit my friend Ed there, him saying to call Monday at the office, and so: __________________________________

Now for their allowing this County-Fed contract of theirs with some federal woman in Washington, D.C. to over-ride Article 12 of the N.H. Constitution in having IT controllable OVER me, such damages ought to be addressed not merely in an RSA Ch. 503:1-12 Small Claims Court action, http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LI-503.htm  but of this Criminal action, and so I charge them with:

RSA Ch. 643:1 of "Official Oppression" http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm in that as it is written of:

"TITLE LXII
CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 643
ABUSE OF OFFICE
Section 643:1
    643:1 Official Oppression. – A public servant, as defined in RSA 640:2, II, is guilty of a misdemeanor if, with a purpose to benefit himself or another or to harm another, he knowingly commits an unauthorized act which purports to be an act of his office; or knowingly refrains from performing a duty imposed on him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office.

Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973."

The details are that each and all three of these "public servant"s, did, "with a purpose to...harm another" meaning: me, AND my friend Ed Brown, on a 6th + 9th Amendment Contract** for Counsel, "knowingly" both: (1) "commit"ed the "unauthorized act" of to contract with the Feds to somehow deviate away from the RSA 123:1 requirement of them to have to file papers in this state with our Secretary of State BEFORE they can conduct any such business as they want of enforcing their criminal statutes here (see the 1943 Adams case at the U.S. Supreme Court***) and/or (2) "refrains from performing" THE duty of to Art. 12 "protect" me from being "controllable" by any other laws and that of what the General Court, as our "legislative body" has NOT consented to, NOR have I given my consent, but just the opposite of my protest against their DENIAL of me to see my friend who has likewise not been protected from same federal outlaws in his own Town & County of Plainfield, Sullivan County, N.H.

This I do file for action of prosecution by the City Prosecutor, since the County Prosecutor is actually the Defender for these three County outlaws!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - -  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

Subscribed and affirmed to in person before me this third day of August, 2009 at: _________, N.H.
______________________________ Notary Public / Justice of the Peace
My Commission expires: _______________________________________

And if the City Prosecutor will not do this, then I will pay the Sheriff to serve these three offenders to appear at a certain day and time in this court to plead to the charges and get onto the next step of justice for them to wise up and do what's right by allowing me to assert my rights as NOT controllable by the Feds, or for them to be prosecuted in the civil realm for more $monetary damages, and this time to me as beyond any RSA 651:63 restitution http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/651/651-63.htm  from the criminal case, and allowing me to file an Equity case for remedy of this right, but by that time of AFTER the already scheduled Sept. 3rd sentencing day in Concord, thus for Ed to file a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for his release from this unlawful incarceration!

pc: Federal Rep. Carol-Shea Porter, who is supposed to be looking into WHO this Federal officer by RSA 123:1 is supposed to be, and since my right to attend this what was supposed to be a lawful "public trial" by the 6th Amendment was stolen from me by me having alerted her many times last year AND this year, by personal contact in Laconia, and by e-mails, letters, and visits to BOTH her Manchester and Dover offices, plus calls to Washington, D.C. she has stone-walled to see to it that her Art. III, Sec. 1 inferior court of Congress be operating properly, and so to charge her for technical "trespass"* upon my rights for her illegally operating court there, and theft as I've said to sue her also in either or both this criminal +/or civil realm!! * http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/635/635-2.htm

** No state shall impair the obligation of contracts! Art. I, Sec. 10, U.S. Constitution.

*** http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm of: ""In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: ( The Fed.Reps' Three Challenges) State-Fed action needed on this "will" word.?
From:    Joseph S. Haas Jr. (josephshaasjr at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Mon 7/27/09 6:12 PM
To:    mike.brown at mail.house.gov
Cc:    olga.clough at mail.house.gov; Joe Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
To Mike Brown:

Washington D.C. Office
1330 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
p. (202) 225-5456
http://www.shea-porter.house.gov/

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Progress Report:

I did just call to there a few minutes ago at from about 9:30 - :40 a.m. this morning = 10 minutes and spoke with Will who took my summarization here of to please have Mike AT LEAST acknowledge that he did get my two e-mails (of this and the follow-up last Monday and Tuesday respectfully) about (3+1=) 4 action items of: (1) a + b of WHO this RSA Ch. 123:1 federal agent is supposed to be to file these 40USC255 papers, and DO it!*; (2) to get a copy of Judge Geo. Z. Singal's oath of office that he "will" (future tense) support the law, and to amend it with an "I do hereby " clause; (3) audit those payments from N.H. to Maine for illegal travel by 18USC3232; + (4) put in a House Bill for that Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 9 "Tribune" for the Defense as like for the Champion or Prosecutor for the People of to Nominate by President and Confirm by the Senate of the U.S. Attorney, to likewise have the Public Defender from the same source, rather than the analogy I just used of: NOT to crack the court, like an egg (as for jurisdictional challenges) from the in-side out, BUT from the OUTside, as in you don't START withIN the enemy's camp, but parley at some neutral territory to hammer out these differences for harmony, or to hammer the liars out of existence! as by to have them impeached!

* I told him that the first one is easy, like me having worked for Sherman Adams at The Loon Mountain Recreation Corp. in Lincoln starting back in 1969 of like him asking around the other workers: where is Joe?, why isn't he picking up this trash?  Thus WHY isn't WHOever this federal agent doing his job of to file these papers!? Hey! I pay (or technically my employer pays $x amount for me) to the Feds as a share from the payroll, leaving me with a reduced $amount check net each WEEK, and so if I pay indirectly each week, then they ought to be able to tell me WHO is NOT doing their job each week, so that the next week I can say: enough is enough!  No more pay from me UNTIL you DO your job!

[JosephSHaas]

Gary's "busy"; 225-1632* to have him call me, or I will to him after lunch, and maybe from Dover AFTER I've filed my criminal complaints that I did just leave a message about this to Estes too, as finding him in disgusting "shape" of not having been THE check and balance against these corrupt County Commissioners!!!

* http://www.usmarshals.gov/district/nh/general/contacts.htm

[JosephSHaas]

To: United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Majority Office              Minority Office
Phone:202-224-7703      Phone:202-224-5225
Fax:202-224-9516          FaxL202-224-9102

Update: as of last Friday, July 31st '09:

http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/one_item_and_teasers/nom_cmtec.htm

Notice: "      In the Committee on the Judiciary

Jul 31, 09     PN849     Department of Justice
               David Lyle Cargill, Jr., of New Hampshire, to be United States Marshal
               for the District of New Hampshire for the term of four years. " **

[nothing scheduled yet; check in with the hearings section at this website.]

I did get a voice mail from him last year to my written request dropped of to the receptionist for The Commissioner of The Department of Safety who relayed it to him, and so that the N.H. State Police investigate by delegation of WHO this federal officer is supposed to be to file their 40USC255 papers* with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State by RSA Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm  and to protect any and all inhabitants (both us citizens/ free men AND inmates) from any other laws (like the U.S. Codes) from being controllable OVER us withOUT our personal consent, or that of our "legislative body" being the N.H. Legislature or General Court, that did make the offer on June 14, 1883, but that it was and still is a "conditional" offer, but that as spelled out in that 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case, an offer is not an acceptance, as the two must combine to be in harmony, and any deviation therefrom withOUT protection, is a violation of our rights as are supposed to be a guarantee by Article 12 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html  for which he has done a lousy job, of actually NO job, as in his omission, rather than co-mission, in him telling me that he never got my RSA Ch. 91-A request, of NOT that, but of my Article 32 instruction to an Article 8 accounting, for which he was responsive, but in a deviant way of never having answered the question or comment to protect us! In other words he did not investigate to where the paperwork sent by Nancy went to, as she told me that it went to him! As in the timing being of to try to prevent those illegal travels over our highways to Maine and back, the Feds being in violation of 18USC3232 but that he and his goons there at the Dept. of Safety doing NOTHING about this! Disgusting.  Suggestion to Judiciary: DO NOT confirm this thief! He takes his paychecks withOUT doing his duty!  He is a thief!

cc: of this to the Senate Judiciary committee http://judiciary.senate.gov/contact.cfm * for to include into the Public Hearing phase of this process so that others can read and act accordingly! Members at: http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

* "see: http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 plus U.S. Attorney Manual #664 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm and: http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm of: ""In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."
** N.H. Dept. of Safety, Division of State Police, http://www.nh.gov/safety/  and http://www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/nhsp/

[JosephSHaas]

He's not in either (Cargill), 271-2450 but that his associate is to pass on the word of my thanks to him for being responsible, but not accountable, as in if he was already told that of the above, then WHY didn't he finish the job!? Or will he do so now that the pressure is put upon him? A test to see if he is worthy of the job he wants.

[JosephSHaas]

They're still looking I guess, http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/ re: my claim #____ 501-244-2877, and I guess too of them not considering your request serious, but trivial unless you call back months later!? Re: Singal - did the Senate fine-tooth comb to do the detail to see if he was legally AND lawfully naturalized in Maine?, per the 1-8-17 to Maine statute of there having to be a Constitutional grant of authority, as an Amendment, rather that statutory like for here in N.H. and MAss. for the Feds to comply by their 40USC255 filing with the S of S, rather than like to the governor in Florida, NONE of these three states having these federal papers!!!