Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 34

[JosephSHaas]

Time to audit the U.S. gold at our Fort Knox.

According to this article and comment over at: http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/not-just-gold-missing-from-mint-hunt.html

this has not been done since 1978, and only a partial audit.

Re: The Section 16 gold deposits supposed to be made to our federal government BEFORE the PRIVATE FRNs of The System are monetized. Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

So that IF there is not enough silver bullion to melt down and coin into the dollars for the Constitutional requirements by Section 20 of The Coinage Act of 1792, then to sell the gold, buy the silver, and do so!

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Time to audit the U.S. gold at our Fort Knox....

According to this article and comment over at: http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/07/not-just-gold-missing-from-mint-hunt.html

this has not been done since 1978, and only a partial audit.

Re: The Section 16 gold deposits supposed to be made to our federal government BEFORE the PRIVATE FRNs of The System are monetized. Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

So that IF there is not enough silver bullion tu melt down and coin into the dollars for the Constitutional requirements by Section 20 of The Coinage Act of 1792, then to sell the gold, buy the silver, and do so!

- - Joe

Here's a copy and paste:

"Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Not just gold missing from mint; hunt also on for silver, platinum
by Eric deCarbonnel

The Vancouver Sun reports that not just gold missing from mint; hunt also on for silver, platinum.

(emphasis mine) [my comment]

Not just gold missing from mint; hunt also on for silver, platinum
By Ian MacLeod, The Ottawa CitizenJuly 3, 2009

OTTAWA - More than just a fortune in gold is missing from the Royal Canadian Mint. Silver, platinum and palladium have disappeared, too, but the mint won't say how much.

Independent audit results released this week found no accounting, bookkeeping or other internal errors to account for about 17,500 troy ounces of gold missing from the mints inventory, the equivalent of almost 44, 400-ounce bars valued at $15.3 million.

The probe by Deloitte briefly notes the mint has "also identified an unaccounted-for difference related to silver," and asked auditors to determine if sloppy accounting or bookkeeping was behind that, too.

Christine Aquino, mint spokeswoman, said in an e-mail the missing $15.3 million in gold, "takes into account ... all our (missing) precious metal, gold being the most significant component but also including silver, platinum and palladium metals."

The suggestion is the amounts are minor, though the mint declined requests to elaborate on the quantities involved.

Meanwhile, speculation is mounting over how to sneak half a ton of gold out of the fortress-like mint headquarters on Sussex Drive, supposedly one of the most secure buildings in Canada.

The bulk of it, 16,494 ounces, disappeared from the gold refinery on the north side of the historic stone building, which is wired with metal detection and monitoring equipment that scans employees exiting the high security area.

According to employees and visitors, one of the detectors creates computerized profiles of any metals in an individual's body, such as dental work and heart stents. If the person's signature profile does not match with the metal scan as they exit the high security zone where precious metals are handled, guards are alerted.

"The first time I went through, I had a one-cent coin in my wallet and they found that," says Bret Evans, managing editor of Canadian Coin News. "They X-rayed my wallet. It was just a simple penny and they gave it physical security to ensure that it was in fact a genuine one-cent coin, not a piece of gold that I'd painted or anything like that."

Beyond the scanning equipment, "to get to where the gold is, you've still got to go through a bunch of guys who make it their job to make sure nothing gets out," he says. "So security is pretty impressive. Having said that, its not a perfect situation."

That was the case in 1996 when a mint machinist smuggled 85 ounces of almost pure gold worth about $37,000 past the metal detectors, surveillance cameras and electronic sensors. A charge of theft against the man was later dropped for unexplained reasons and the mint was spared the humiliation of a trial that would have explained how the man beat the elaborate security system.

The mint has experienced other thefts, though nothing like the prospect it now faces if it's determined the missing gold is due to theft.

In 1988, a 23-year veteran janitor at the Sussex Drive plant stole at least $30,000 in gold, bit by bit. The man worked in an area where objects that come into contact with liquid gold, such as tools, are crushed and recycled so the gold can be recovered. Police found he had more than $150,000 in unexplained income between 1985 and 1988.

The biggest gold heist in Canada remains the 1974 Ottawa airport theft by the Stop Watch Gang headed by Paddy Mitchell, the most infamous hood to come out of Ottawa. In an article he wrote for this newspaper in 2000, Mitchell revealed how the trio stole more than $750,000 in gold from the Ottawa airport and en route to the mint.

"We needed an inside man who could tell us when the gold arrived and how much there was," Mitchell wrote. "The guy I recruited worked on the night shift and was a petty thief who had been stealing things at the airport for years — mostly nickel-and-dime stuff.

"We had to get past an armed guard into a locked warehouse, break into a security room, lug out six gold bars weighing 65 pounds each and hope that the RCMP or the city police didn't drive by the busy access road and notice something amiss.

"Minutes later the guard's head was covered and he was handcuffed to a steel bar. Stephen (Reid) let Lionel (Wright) in through the door, the gold bars were loaded into the car and they hit it down the road with the car 4,380 troy ounces heavier than it was when it arrived. At least, that's what know-it-all journalists and book authors wrote. The truth is we just re-labelled the boxes in the cargo area and Air Canada very generously delivered them to us in Windsor the next day.

"I shipped five bars of gold across the Windsor-Detroit border, collected $250,000 cash as a downpayment and got a promise of another $250,000 when (a middleman fence) sold the gold. I never saw another dime from it."

Mitchell was convicted in 1977 on that and other crimes, and sentenced to 17 years behind bars. He escaped from a Kingston prison two years later. He died in a U.S. prison in 2007.

Before the Stop Watch Gang, the "Flying Bandit" is believed to have held the Canadian gold theft record. Winnipegger Ken Leishman, a bush pilot-turned-bandit, staged a series of bank and other robberies in the '60s and '70s, escaping from police in a small plane.

In March 1966, he and two accomplices dressed in Air Canada overalls pulled up to a small plane that has just landed with a reported 360 kilograms of gold ingots being delivered to the mint's Winnipeg plant. Leishman signed a receipt and the men drove off with the gold, valued at $400,000.

Globally, the biggest gold theft in modern times remains the 1983 London Heathrow Brinks Mat job. More than three tonnes of gold ingots, then worth about 26 million pounds sterling or $110 million Cdn based on today's price of gold, were stolen by six armed men dressed in security uniforms.

The suspects burst into the security company's Heathrow Airport depot the morning of Nov. 26, 1983, disarmed a security system, doused two guards with gasoline and threatened to set them on fire unless they revealed the combination to a vault.

Expecting to find cash, they instead found the gold packed into 76 cardboard boxes, plus two boxes of diamonds.

A handful of men were arrested and imprisoned, including another warehouse guard who gave the gang inside information. But police believe as many as 15 suspects were in on the heist, some of whom retired to luxurious European homes and villas.

The BBC reports some of the gold simply vanished into a criminal underworld and reappeared in foreign bank accounts in Luxembourg, Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, Miami and the Bahamas. Much remains missing today. It is claimed in some quarters that anyone wearing gold jewelry bought in the United Kingdom after 1983 is probably wearing Brinks Mat.

My reaction: More than just a fortune in gold is missing from the Royal Canadian Mint. Silver, platinum and palladium have disappeared too.

1) Independent audit results released this week found no accounting, bookkeeping or other internal errors to account for about 17,500 troy ounces of gold missing from the mints inventory.

2) Speculation is mounting over how to sneak half a ton of gold out of the fortress-like mint headquarters on Sussex Drive, supposedly one of the most secure buildings in Canada.

3) Although, gold was the most significant component, silver, platinum and palladium metals are missing too.


Conclusion: If half a ton of gold could disappear from one of the most secure buildings in Canada, then couldn't it the same thing happen in the US? Isn't it about time for US gold reserves to be audited?
pencil icon, that\

Posted by Eric deCarbonnel at 11:43 AM Delicious email Print this post
Labels: Gold News_Developments
Click Here To Scroll Through My Recent Post List
3 Comments:

VegasBD said...

    When was the last audit of the US's Gold? '78? Even that wasnt a full audit.
    July 21, 2009 12:55 PM   
Anonymous said...

    What about all those "secure" storage facilities, such as the vaults operated worldwide by HSBC, Morgan Stanley, and dozens of private corporations? If the RCM can't hold their valuta safely, how can anyone trust any storage facility?

    Which leads to another question. Let's presume that SLV and GLD are legit outfits and they have every ounce of silver and gold represented by their outstanding shares, and these shares are not simply being readied for delivery to the Comex to satisfy futures deliveries. How do we trust the security of their vaults?

    If you own precious metals, keep it by yourself and to yourself.
    July 21, 2009 3:39 PM   
Robert said...

    Amusingly Brinks Mat is one of the custodians for GLD. When the gold was stolen it was in 83 it was taken from this warehouse.

    Brinks Mat warehouse

    I wonder if there's any GLD gold there today...
    July 21, 2009 4:06 PM   

Post a Comment
Newer Post | Older Post | Home | "

[JosephSHaas]

Funny Russell!  the word to spelled "tu". -- Joe -- I checked! 

[JosephSHaas]

tu read all of this stuff later:

"Treasury Secretary Geithner tu Imprison Thousands on Tax Charges"

over at: http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=4982&cpage=1#comment-14770

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More stuff to read about the I.R.S.:

http://famguardian.org/PublishedAuthors/Media/Antishyster/V10N2-PiercingCorpVeil.pdf

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the proof of delivery:

"
RE: Web Site Contact Form?
From:    John Boehner (AsktheLeader at mail.house.gov)
   Medium riskYou may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent:    Mon 11/02/09 10:13 AM
To:    JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

Thank you for contacting the Office of the House Republican Leader. Your thoughts are important to me and are appreciated. Due to the volume of E-mail I receive, it may not be possible to personally respond to your comments. However, please be assured that your comments are important to me and my colleagues.

Sincerely,

John A. Boehner

Republican Leader"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I did just call his office at 1-202-225-4000 and asked the man who answered the phone to please read my e-mail through the website with receipt of exactly 10:13 AM Eastern time to likewise refer to the House Leader Boehner (pronounced Bay-ner) and either have him deliver the 40USC3112 papers himself to our N.H. Secretary of State or be accompanied by the GSA Administrator of the man with that woman who wants to take over his job.

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091103/FRONTPAGE/911030301&template=single

entitled: "The case of the missing data."

of: "This doesn't make sense.  There's something missing here in this story.

Reference: "Replacing the floodgates would cost about $1,000." and then the statement that: " It will cost several thousand dollars to heat his mill with wood this winter, instead of with his hydro-powered turbine. "

So WHY doesn't  Mr. Wagner just buy two more floodgates @ $500 each instead of spending $1000s of dollars later!? Plus how much $______ for "the turbine needs major repair work at a machine shop." That work taking #____ amount of time to complete, or the machinist not available now?

I'll bet his name, address and telephone # are on the next ones if and when ever bought and " left them leaning against a 15-foot boulder" and with either a NO TRESPASSING sign, or one reading: Private Property, not Abandoned, and here's the reason WHY, of maybe a metal box with papers there explaining the process to those who happen to stumble upon what they thought was Abandoned Property.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_turbine and http://new.wvic.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8&Itemid=45 plus: *

Good luck in getting these back, that if you do, and have already purchased two more, now you have some spares! (;-)
________________________________

footnote #1: http://books.google.com/books?id=9FISAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA3-PA36&lpg=RA3-PA36&dq=floodgate+penstock+private&source=bl&ots=AyUjDC0klN&sig=ekejb_lKd7CwumriV22pDN21RXo&hl=en&ei=iEXwSvWnK9OrlAfovuntCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CCEQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=floodgate%20penstock%20private&f=false about a "floodgate, flap, sluice, penstock" - now there's that "moiety" word again, re: my previous reply about taxes of never to take the entire tree, but only up to half the apples as an example, plus in this report of sometimes of charges against only that part of the district, sort of like the N.H. RSA Ch. 239:29  Betterment Assessment of to fix up Class VI roads for only the abutters to re-pay in an up to 10-year time frame. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XX/231/231-29.htm

footnote #2: http://www.motherearthnews.com/Renewable-Energy/1980-11-01/Mothers-Hydroelectric-Plant.aspx "

[JosephSHaas]

Ed,

Yes, Devens withIN Ayer, MAss. is withIN Middlesex County, and the closest courthouse is in Lowell, MA 01852 (360 Gorham Street, tel. 617-788-8130 main # over to 978-453-0201) but the man there on a press 280 for Civil said that all NEW cases start out of the Main Office: Middlesex County Superior Court, 200 Trade Center, Woburn, MA 01801 Tel. 781-939-2700 ___*

* to call there about getting you a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus form (like the one I used in Grafton County, N.H. and got out of jail thanks to the form in McNamara's "Criminal Practice & Procedure" book).

Reference: http://www.mass.gov/legis/const.htm for The Massachusetts Constitution, Part The Second, Chapter VI, Article VII of: "The privilege and benefit of the writ of habeas corpus shall be enjoyed in this commonwealth in the most free, easy, cheap, expeditious and ample manner; and shall not be suspended by the legislature, except upon the most urgent and pressing occasions, and for a limited time not exceeding twelve months."

Thus for the judge there to see to it that unless the Feds there can supply proof of the N.H. filing as the end does NOT justify the means, as in the turn-over to there by N.H. Deputy Marshals of the U.S. Marshal Service which is in default of N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 for the 40USC255 non acceptance of such, that you either be released forthwith to freedom, or at least back to Strafford County for our N.H. judge to deal with this illegal and unlawful incarceration.

Good luck, -- Joe

* At Press 5 for Civil, the man transferred me to Press 4 for Criminal Attn: Mary, where I got her voice mail, and left a message that she send the form to me, so that I can attach all the documentation of the above and re-send to you, but by that time you might be out of there? back to Dover?  Anyway, it's being done as soon as she listens to my voice recording, and to get back to you.

P.S. Just like what Danny did in Dover [tu], but that at the time he didn't have that 40USC255 stuff nor the 1943 Adams case from the U.S. Supreme Court.  The Federal system of that you've got to first file a habeas with the sentencing court, and then by Rule 63 to whatever federal court be in the jurisdiction of your next location for what's called the collateral attack. This latest info thanks to Reno.

What a jerk!  I called Mary @ 11:59 a.m. today and told her that I had called her last Tuesday about getting a form for a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.  Instead of having past-tense already sent it to me was what I was hoping she would say, she got into the start of a twenty questions by asking if "it" was a civil or criminal case; I told her that I had originally called for the civil papers, but that "they" over at the other court, the man, said to call here for a criminal form.  She then asked what the case # was.  I said it was not in her court, and instead of playing this "game" of 20 Questions, I hung up!

I called her back a few minutes later and a man answered.  He asked his question #1 of: are you an inmate? no; are you an attorney? no. I'm a friend of an inmate over at the Devens FMC.  He said that "We cannot supercede the Feds, you've got to file it in federal court." Thus which one?

Question to everyone and anyone: The sentencing court by Rule 63, right? so as to get denied there by Singal and THEN do a collateral attack to THE federal court in Boston, right?  But then again, as Danny's petition said, you do not need to go federal, so try telling this to these Clerks and Deputy Clerks, etc. to try to get to first base!

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.bclilaw.com/news.html

"June 2009 – Michael J. Iacopino Appointed to New Hampshire Public Defender Program Board of Directors – On June 26, 2009, Mike Iacopino was unanimously selected by the New Hampshire Bar Association Board of Governors to serve on the Board of Directors for the New Hampshire Public Defender Program ("NHPDP"). The NHPDP (a non-profit, private corporation) administers a state-wide contract to provide legal services to indigent persons charged with crimes and juveniles alleged to be delinquent. NHPDP boasts over 200 employees, 117 of whom are public defender staff attorneys who practice in every court in the State of New Hampshire. NHPDP operates on a budget in excess of 17 million dollars each year and is among the most respected public defender programs in the Nation."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Modification:

http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Iacopino_Michael_132716980.aspx

1. Page 1 of 5+ #2 down from the top to 75 entries:

messenger-inquirer.com/articles/2009/07/09/news/nationa - [Cached Version]
Published on: 7/9/2009    Last Visited: 7/9/2009 

Ed Brown's defense lawyer, Michael Iacopino, argued that prosecutors had failed to prove his client acted with willful criminal intent.

[ $1.00 to get that story: https://secure.townnews.com/shared-content/subscription/authenticate/index.php?mode=start&domain=messenger-inquirer.com&usereg=1&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmessenger-inquirer.com%2F%2Farticles%2F2009%2F07%2F09%2Fnews%2Fnational%2F15149273.txt&discover=0&amex=0 ]

2. Page 1 #6

www.nhbar.org/publications/display-news-issue.asp?id=51 - [Cached Version]
Published on: 8/7/2009    Last Visited: 8/7/2009 

Retired District Court Judge Vincent Iacopino, at left, with his son, attorney Michael Iacopino.

[ this link supplied is NOT the one with the photo of the son and his dad. ]

3. Page 1 #8

www.arkenterprises.com/dialch258.html - [Cached Version]
Published on: 8/9/2009    Last Visited: 8/9/2009 

Michael Iacopino, the lawyer appointed to assist Ed Brown, has not filed a motion questioning Ed Brown's competency, but in a series of questions yesterday, Singal appeared to probe the issues necessary for making such a determination.

[For Iac in the search box of Edit: Find i(this page) t goes to two postings of the June 2, 2009 article by Margo in The "Concord Monitor" plus his Notice to Judge on the same day. ]

4. Page 1 #9

www.arkenterprises.com/dialch259.html - [Cached Version]
Published on: 8/9/2009    Last Visited: 8/9/2009 

represented by Michael J. Iacopino
...
Ed Brown's attorney, Michael Iacopino, focused on his client's mental state.
...
Brown's perspective was informed by his knowledge of prior bloody government standoffs and his own personal experiences with the U.S. marshals, who employed large teams of armed men to arrest the Browns and search their home and office, Iacopino said.

"His intent was to live, not to commit a crime," he said.
...
Iacopino urged jurors to look past Brown's personality to focus on the elements of the crimes.
...
He didn't take direction well," Iacopino said.

[ This includes Margo's July 20, 2009 report in The MONITOR about: "David Quinn and that he worked for a company called the Forseti Group".

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentType=GSA_BASIC&contentId=25647

I did just send him an e-mail; to copy and paste, later...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mod:

"40USC3112 filing to N.H. - - Please!?
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Thu 11/05/09 3:29 PM
To:    judith.larsen at gsa.gov
Cc:    ...iacopino... linda at ....
To: Judith Larsen, scheduling secretary
for GSA "head" Mr. Prouty.

Paul F. Prouty, Acting Administrator of the G.S.A.: General Services Administration, , 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20405, Phone: (202) 501-0800.

Dear Judith:

This is to follow-up my telephone call to Ms. Chanel there at the GSA HQ's in Washington, D.C. a few minutes ago, to when and where she said to contact you for to PLEASE have your boss, or one of his subordinates finally file these 40USC3112 papers with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the SHALL word in N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1.

A copy of my latest contacts involving this subject matter includes: (1) my letter to the Devens FMC in MAss. where a friend of mine is a current victim of the over-reaching federal militant action without authority, which Lt. Spina told me on the phone that he never got my letter! and so could not transfer it over to the other side of that "body" there!!; (2) The REFUSAL by Federal Rep. Nikki Tsongas to get involved because that zip code of a subsection of Ayer is NOT in her bailiwick!; (3) my call over to that Middlesex County Superior Court for a check-and-balance likewise REFUSED by them too at the Commonwealth level, preferring not to buck the feds, (4) some MAss. attorney MAYBE to see to it that justice be done no matter what the cost as per the counselor word in Bouvier's Dictionary, but probably not, as my friend might be shipped out before then, as back to here in N.H., and so: (5) (a) I did contact some N.H. Attorney next to where he will be re-housed, but that he said to contact his public defender at the Federal level who CAN go after the Feds that feed him his salary by some collateral attack, but will he? and so (b) to him too, as ALSO the head of the N.H. Public Defender Program, great! To see to it that this Article 12- N.H. "inhabitant" is not further harmed by these federal "outlaws"!

Thus would you, Mr. Prouty PLEASE file these papers right away, like tomorrow, or next Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday on a Special Trip to here (or by mail?), or maybe WITH House Republican Leader Mr. Boehner leading the way, or is he a follower? or will you follow AFTER his next Friday appearance here in N.H. when he can claim that he got here first and THEN you filed it, after what? making one phone call to you to get the job done?

A copy of this e-mail to Mr. Boehner to "spur" him to set the fire under your feet, or will that fire be set by my e-mail to you right here and now?  Time is of the essence, as they say because if this new evidence of federal non-filing having at last been filed, is NOT filed, then the same 'ol B.S. will be conducted by this Art. III, Sec. 1 inferior Court of Congress in effect saying: we don't care about the rules or the Constitution of the United States! We will do EVERYthing in our power to hurt by whatever means, those who argue such to NOT allow this to ever be brought in as an Exhibit # to the jury of his peers! Such I find arrogantly disgusting, and hope and pray plus petition that you see the light here of what the truth is and to do your job as request by me, a citizen of the state of New Hampshire needing no middleman or governor to have to send you a written invitation, my invitation to you right here and now of to please do so.

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

cc: to both the N.H. and MAss. attorneys, as I think they ought to know about your plans AND its conclusion for if and when to file such Petition(s) in either MAss.achusetts and/or New Hampshire based upon this NEW evidence.

bcc: to nobody else (yet)."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091106/NEWS01/911060338

entitled: "The pen is mightier than the sword. * + **"

of: "Holly and Hany: Thanks for the info.

I think a photo of Ed Brown holding the Constitution outside his "compound" when he gets released on Habeas Corpus later this month, with his gun in the other hand ought to be Front Page News.

Re: http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.msg311976#msg311976

* http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/pen+is+mightier+than+the+sword.html

** http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/the-pen-is-mightier-than-the-sword.html

I like this history and for into the future the best: "Thomas Jefferson sent a letter to Thomas Paine in 1796, in which he wrote: "Go on doing with your pen what in other times was done with the sword."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTu9HaHDI0A&feature=related "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091106/OPINION/911060302

entitled: "These graduates of honor then, now tarnished of dis-honor!"

of: "Time to give them: "the boot".

Yes, the "People are Rines's biggest legacy", both the good and bad* apples.

* Emphasis added for the following:

1. "James Duggan, now a New Hampshire Supreme Court justice. " Too bad he can't add! re: of when I told him in Superior Court, in the Gus Breton case, that when the judge said this case was almost four months old without a trial, I told him he ought to re-calculate his math, as it was OVER four months! per the "Speedy Trial Rule", and the Investigator Mike Bahan from the A.G.'s Office said to me, on the way out: "you asshole"!

2. "There are many familiar names among the 86 members of that 1976 graduating class. It included... Charles Russell...." now a member of the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims.  BTW he recused himself upon my Claim #2009-013 there in September '09 of my Oct. 15, 2008 filing because he's a friend of the governor, John H. Lynch of Hopkinton, that lazy bastard whose Art. 51 duty is to send an invitation to the G.S.A. Federal Officer by 40USC3112 to file those N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State but won't! "Charlie", a golf buddy, refusing to tell the governor to, in effect, replace the divot, or in this case: take the swing!  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm

3. "Merrimack County Superior Court Clerk William McGraw" who allows the Feds to use their U.S. Codes to over-ride our rights as are supposed to be a guarantee by Article 12 of the N.H. Constitution! "http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html of: "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." Re: Those Removal Statutes at Large, that are NOT supposed to be at-large over us! here in New Hampshire!

4. "Cathy Green" aka Mrs. James R. Starr, him the Clerk of the U.S. District Court.  She "knows" that he has no operating papers for that Article III, Section 1 inferior Court of Congress, but turns a deaf ear because it's her husband who works there, of not WHAT you know but WHO you know, in the cover-up! http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/40/usc_sec_40_00003112----000-.html see also: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm and http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm

5.  "The state's newest Supreme Court justice, Carol Ann Conboy, is a Franklin Pierce graduate" because of her confirmation hearing votes by the Executive Councilors http://www.nh.gov/council/ and http://www.nhexecutivecouncil.com/ who allowed the substantive to over-ride her violation(s) of "procedural due process of law", or, in effect, the Council, after hearing my report of her misdeeds in that Public Hearing, said: the end justified the means, to heck with the 5th & 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution! See http://www.nh.gov/constitution/council.html for "[Art.] 63. [Impeachment of Councilors.] The members of the council may be impeached by the house, and tried by the senate for bribery, corruption, malpractice, or maladministration. - June 2, 1784 - Amended 1792 changing wording generally and changing mal-conduct to bribery, corruption, malpractice, or maladministration." "

[JosephSHaas]

Thanks Keith, ...

Also: Here's some info about Elaine's future lawsuit against The City of Concord and County of Merrimack, plus that I did also notify ahead of time for this Article 12 protection to the N.H. Dept. of Safety [tu], to sue its Commissioner in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board pf Claims for $50,000. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LV-541-B.htm and http://www.nh.gov/safety/commissioner/index.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091018/OPINION/910180332

entitled: "Local Government Center website; & Risk Management info."

of: "http://www.nhlgc.org/LGCWebsite/index.asp

Plus: in regards to paragraph #7 of 13: " dozens of risk management ...programs and services help KEEP local governments functioning RESPONSIBLY...." (emphasis ADDed.)

Oh really!? Risk Management is ALSO for if and when the "local" government screws up in some "error or omission" [tu]! as in to pay* the victim.

* One County I did check recently pays over $100,000 per year is their premium for a $5 million insurance policy.  I did ask what the premium is for Merrimack County at the Commissioner's Office (line item #____ in the budget, for to guess at such policy, using this similar ratio since financial info is exempt from the RSA Ch. 91-A:5 Right to Know,  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-VI-91-A.htm ) and was told, in effect, to: "get lost"! re: the Sheriff's FAILure to Article 12 "protect" one of the city and county's "inhabitants"** from any OTHER law not consented [tu]. The "local" COPs telling me that she was NOT a "resident", and so deserved NO protection!  But see: http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html and http://www.appealslawyer.net/briefs/Gonzalez_Cirino_BriefAsFiled.pdf from http://www.appealslawyer.net/case_list.html and in particular Section XII at pages 55-60 of 62."

** In reference to this "inhabitant" word, the only excuse I can see of THEM using this is based upon The "ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION AND PERPETUAL UNION", see: http://books.google.com/books?id=nLgZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=lien+against+body+%22Habeas+Corpus%22&source=bl&ots=EQEDYNqkvS&sig=_Tl4waPx7-nZiKbg8s-5ALCjOEk&hl=en&ei=Ap71SoGPAo-m8Aaw_OjzCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAoQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false click for the pdf file gets you to this and of The Declaration of Independence plus Constitution of the United States in the front of the book entitled "REVISED STATUTES OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS 1887 TOGETHER WITH THE GENERAL ACTS" compiled by HARVEY B. HURD, EVANSTON, COOK Co., Ill.

See, in particular page 3 / 26 of 1531 for  The "ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION AND PERPETUAL UNION" and "Between the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Caroline, South Caroline, and Georgia."

And especially: ARTICLE IV ( of XIII at page 4 / 27) of: "The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, (paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted,) shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states;"

So in Elaine's case of late, as per the above, then the City of Concord and Merrimack County Sheriff's Office plus The N.H. State Police relied on this for their reasoning that she was NOT entitled to Article 12- N.H. "Protection" as an "inhabitant" from "any other laws" like these U.S. Codes, because this Article 12 of June 2, 1784 canNOT void the 1778 contract by The "ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION"? ARTICLE IV of ONLY to "free inhabitants" and so NOT for ALL inhabitants?

Answer: No! That is only for when there be dealings "among the people of the different states in this Union", but NOT the federalies themselves! or is it that because a team of federal agents comprised of members thereof from various other states like U.S. Deputy Marshal Andre LeBier from New York, then our Article 12 of ALL inhabitants has been replaced by this for only to be allowed to those FREE inhabitants?

So the general question to all of us is: Is our Article 12 N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights as for ALL "inhabitants" in 1784 a nullity because by  ARTICLE IV of XIII in The ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION of July 9th, 1778 we had previously agreed to these privileges to be NOT "controllable by any other laws" to be ONLY limited to FREE inhabitants? as signed by JOSIAH BARTLETT and JOHN WENTWORTH, JR on August 8th, 1778 here in New Hampshire "On the part and behalf of the State of New Hampshire" (page 8 / 31).

Thus leading to the age old question of: does the end justify the means? As in: have we given up our procedural due process of law as is supposed to be a guarantee by the 5th & 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

As for example: Ed & Elaine were both free BEFORE these U.S. Codes were wrongfully applied to them, and now that they are NOT free, then they come under the Articles of Confederation as NOT currently entitled to these privileges!?

Therefore getting to our Article 14-N.H. rights to COMPLETE justice too! BOTH of the past and current tense to lead to the future tense of them freed as victims of these federalies operating as outlaws to THE U.S. Constitution and in particular Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of needing our "Consent" BEFORE their laws can be used OVER us! by our protections afforded us by Article 12- N.H. since there has been no N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 federal filing by that G.S.A. "head" of agency, as landlord OVER this Article III, Section 1 inferior court of Congress as a tenant there, and so WHEN will Mr. Prouty of the General Services Administration finally file these 40USC3112 papers!? thus proving that they/ the Feds had no jurisdictional authority UNTIL then, and that ONLY for OVER their boundaries as to the place there that ought to have a sign reading: Woe to all those entering this temple with goddess of in-justice statue at the entrance without full knowledge of the truth!

[JosephSHaas]

First Draft at: The Strafford County Superior Court, Dover, N.H.

Joseph S. Haas v. Board of Strafford County Commissioners

Case Number: 219-2009-CV-00614

Motion to Attach.

NOW COMES the Plaintiff Haas in regards to the Commissioners' dis-allowance of me to be able to visit my friend Ed Brown in the Strafford County Jail because of some dictate from on high from the Feds, that has been argued in writing is against: (1) my right to "assemble" by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or in other words: to "gather together into a group" both of Ed and me to fulfill his right "to have the Assistance of Counsel" that we both contracted for such "meet"ings*; and (2) my right of NOT to be "controllable by any other laws" such as these U.S. Codes or Statutes at Large nor any verbal or written policies or rules, etc. that act as having the force and effect of law! that is against Article 12 of The New Hampshire Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights.

See my latest Reply #9278 on page 619 over at The NHUnderground website of what I think is the mix-up here, and of this Board and Fed cooperative maybe using a prior agreement as their excuse that we, as a "State" with the capital letter S for the corporate State had (and maybe still have with those other States), in that by ARTICLE IV of The "ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION" these protections are NOT afforded to fugitives from the law, but only those free inhabitants, and of WHEN the free kicked into being a fugitive, and of WHEN this protection SHALL have been afforded in the first place, as the end does NOT justify the means!

This being said, and of the payments from the Feds to the Board of housing inmate Edward-Lewis: Brown there at $____ per day, with $_______ in sub-total having already supposedly been "paid" in the lawful money of account of the United States per Section 20 of the contract being The Coinage Act of 1792, then:

Be it hereby requested in a Claim of to please Attach said payments or dollars remaining in said account to the level of at least $3000 where this money was supposedly deposited to be liened for the benefit of me, the Plaintiff for when I do win this case of to be compensated for these two trips to, at and from there, as explained, for the jury to first determine: yes or no of a damage(s) against me of having taken place by them, and THEN to determine its value as based upon the remedy for theft per our RSA Ch. 651:63 for Restitution as annotated.

Sincerely Yours, - - Joe Haas

*assemble: see also: ""gather into one place, company, body, or whole".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mod:

http://www.jstor.org/pss/3476557

JSTOR: California Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Mar., 1933), page 266

"JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS ON 'FUNDAMENTAL' OR 'JURISDICTIONAL' FACTS. [ by Felix S.] - The general proposition that an administrative body or tribunal should be confined to the exercise of the authority validly conferred upon it will be accepted without question."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091109/NEWS01/911090345&template=single

entitled: "Time to put Uncle Sam on a diet!"

of: "Thank you "very" much Norma! and Ovide too for "to bring the federal budget into balance and pay off the country's debt" by the "control" of "federal spending".  The key word of "control" as in not only to regulate, but verify, and that reserve word of not only as a verb but in THE Reserve, a noun being what is supposed to be by Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 BEFORE these private FRNs costing the "System" only 6-cents each for ANY and ALL denominations from the $1.00 to the $100.00 bill are "monetized".

I did just try to connect with the http://ovide2010.com website but that it needs a user name and password, and so I called and spoke with Ovide for a few minutes about 30 minutes ago of him in his Manchester office of: http://www.devinemillimet.com/ at the 603: 669-1000 telephone number, me (1) saying hello, long-time no-see since around the Bill Zeliff days ...

[of when Bill, as U.S. Rep. was to investigate by check-and-balance for "Free Commercial Speech" (Vol. 400 Mass. Reports __ the Beineke case of 1987, footnote #7, for William Devine of Boston, the Locator ) the Indirect Criminal Contempt of Court N.H. Rule 95-b Champerty charge against me being an un-licensed "Bounty Hunter" of Missing Heirs to inheritances for finder's fees that the N.H. Supreme Court ruled in Spring 1992 in the Adkin case was no longer case-law, but of the inferior* Superior Court in Grafton County in Fall 1992 charging me with violation of same that was retrospectively against the law! by Article 23 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights. The result being of my incarceration for100 days to be "corrected" when finally this Winter 2010 the N.H. Legislature will be dealing with this in a House Bill of Address for me having spent 90 days MORE than what the law allows for up to ten (10) days according to Articles 22+23, Part 2, N.H. Constitution as applied to the judiciary by Art. 92-a that used to be UNDER the Legislature or GENERAL Court and is now supposedly a "co-equal"branch of government with "MORE" powers!?]

...and (2) a question of HOW and WHERE this federal filing will take place today and by WHO, with him telling me of by an associate of his in Washington to deliver it to the office in-person @ __:__ a.m./p.m. that ought to be an EVENT, him saying that there will be more EVENTS here in N.H. during the campaign, with "stops" at _______ and _______; that "stop" word used by me, as in the old train-stops of old.

And that in regards to federal filing by THE Feds to us I told him he should look into the Title 40 U.S. Code 3112 (from the old section 255) non-filing of the Feds that "shall" be done by our N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 and that his brother-of-the-N.H. Bar Association  M.I. of Manchester ( for Mission: Impossible? (;-) ) too hopefully will be working on it, in a case that I think all of you know of what I'm talking about, and it a "firecracker" case is what I told Ovide, as not to violate any Rules of Ethics in over-stepping the workings of a brother attorney, but KNOWing that as a future public servant, I think it would be a "platinum star" for him if SOMEhow he helps current General Services Administration "head" of "agency" Paul F. Prouty to complete his job description, and especially when invited to by me, an Article 12 "inhabitant" of this state of New Hampshire as I did by e-mail to him through his scheduling secretary of last Thursday, Nov. 5th @ 3:29 PM.  To which I add now, like what Martin J. "Red" Beckman, the author did say in the 1980s here in our state when running for President of the United States: of something like: to have this federal gorilla over there on Pleasant Street, Concord like in a U.S. Zoo, and with the bars of the constitution to have him so contained, getting fed by our Art. 95 state collectors of both the state AND federal taxes, or in other words to put Uncle Sam on a diet!"

[DonnaVanMeter]

I read the email from the lawyer (Joshua Gordon), to Reno when he called this afternoon, he said he expected the process to take quite some time, and was not discourage by this information.

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=170785320&blogId=517791015

Reno said that he has written Kim to explain that he has filed the paperwork for a transfer, and other issues in the correspondence, he fears that they will hold this letter and foresees that he will be thrown in the HOLE for some time for this letter and for protesting his being housed there in El Reno, instead of a lesser security facility like a camp since he has no history of violence in his case. So if we do not hear from him as far as phone calls in the next several days, he is being punished and would hope that we all make noise as well as file through the appropriate channels to get his transfer to go through.


Thank you
Donna VanMeter