Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 34

[JosephSHaas]

This just to my inbox,

http://www.bluestonepremiumroofingsystemsinc.com/2008-02-04%20-%20REVOKED%20-%20No%20trial%20by%20a%20jury%20of%20my%20peers.htm

to read, later...

[JosephSHaas]

It's time for the Probation Officer to "form"* his Gov't P.S.I. so as to: "ameliorate** the sentence".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentence_investigation

** To make or become better; improve, from the word: meliorate = an instance*** or form of improvement.

Thus for the word instance*** as either a case or example, or a step in a series of steps OR "A prompting; request" I choose the latter, and suggest that Ed prompt (as in "To give rise to; inspire", as in to have the P.S.I. embossed**** with the State Seal of Approval or NOT, as in that of finding out IF the Feds have filed their 40USC255 to 40USC3112 papers by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 as per the mechanism of our choice upon the Feds from 1-8-17 of the U.S. Constitution.)

* The "form" or "Procedure as determined by regulation" is already spelled out in our N.H. Constitution of to guarantee to the inhabitants, not only this Article 12 protection, but for Art. 14 "prompt"ness too, as in this part of the definition of the word prompt requiring this embossing: from the word emboss of: "To cover with or as with a RAISED design" (emphasis ADDed for our State Seal to be OVER that of these words written by federal agents! The law of the Flag, as BOTH flags do fly at the flagpoles there at 53-55 Pleasant Street. Former Gov. Jeanne Shaheen having given the flags for inside the new Warren B. Rudman building.) The word emboss from the Old French of "to put a knob in", the word knobb = "A rounded protuberance on a surface" and "A rounded handle, as a "tree knot", the branches of government supposed to be in harmony with each other, that if missing this Seal of Approval after prompted to be there, then any federal sentence is NOT approved by THIS state and to be challenged collaterally by Rule 63 by any other federal jurisdiction IN compliance with the law to teach this and these corrupt judges here that the end does NOT justify the means, as they have stolen this procedural due process of law!

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas, the point-of-order man with the raised seal of gold on the document as proof of non-filing that was bumped out of court by the goon squad there of the Deputy U.S. Marshals, and so also was its reference paper in court referred to in transcript page #___ about that Side Bar Whispering, and so to re-do another seal at this POINT in time further on down the road of time, Ed and the others being victims to a GREATer degree for more $damages in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims against the N.H. Dept. of Safety for their FAILure to protect!

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/111382/96735

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091219/FRONTPAGE/912190342

entitled: "Time to Karma-ize the Feds here with some 100-fold vibes!"

of: "Right on Tim; especially for that: "As Keefe notes, 'My saying is you do us good, we'll do you good back; you do us bad and we'll give you 100 times worse.' - - That's the side law enforcement* focuses on. That's the side that makes headlines."

* "Law" Enforcement !?  You have got to be sh**ing me!

The judges here in N.H. are consistent too: by throwing those thieves in jail costing us, the tax payers money! when they should be on a leash working at a 50% reduction of pay toward the sevenfold of what they stole. [Proverbs 6:30-31, and Public Law 97-280 (96 Statute 1211) of Oct. 4, 1982 = The Year of the Bible for 1983 and beyond.] That includes government thieves too!

Where do they get this hundred fold formula? Like the word centurion? So in other words if one of the officers commanding a century or a group of a hundred people, does wrong, then it's not a 100-fold rightness in the other direction to correction for every one of the 100, but a 100-fold correction to THAT individual? Wow! Talk about the fine-line that our COPs are supposed to walk! Like the COPs of the N.H. State Police withIN the N.H. Dept. of Safety.  WHERE was their "protection" we paid for when some members of us as Article 12 "inhabitants" were taken over by the Feds!? Those federal agents, like our Congressmen who KNOW that their Article 3, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution inferior court of Congress being this U.S. District Court, is a tenant to the GSA / General Services Administration landlord Mr. Prouty who has FAILed to file his 40USC255 to 40USC3112 papers with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State as required by the "shall" word in RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution. 

So WHEN this is finally "corrected" will these victims collect that $2,500 per day too, like in the Veronica Silva case of the mid 1980s at the N.H. State Board of Claims (RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23) currently amounting to about $2 million for about 800 days so far, or be restricted to this statutory $amount of only up to $250,000 !?  When officers of law act under "color" of law that is NOT the law, they abandon their protection when done in a "wanton" manner and are liable to pay the difference.  You'd think that they'd wise up sooner than later to mitigate that "moiety" damage against both their principle plus interest, as in a Writ of Elegit action against them resulting in having to give up half their house and garnishment of 50% of their salary until the damages are paid in full!

The songs we hear out of Congress at the branch offices, like for Hodes and Gregg in Concord (and Shaheen and Shea-Porter in Dover, plus their Manchester offices too) are a tune of bad vibes.  They do us bad, and ought to get some of these hundred-fold vibes in return.  Like I was there on my cell phone the other day at Gregg's office calling this federal agent of Prouty to do his job! Maybe 100 Hell's Angels in the office and hallway might make them listen? AND do the law!"

[JosephSHaas]

About time for the NEW A.G. of the U.S. to bring some Obama "change" to here in N.H.with a Special Grand Jury, eh?  Like to ask WHY the Feds have FAILed to have their landlord, Mr. Prouty of the G.S.A. file those 40USC255 to 40USC3112 papers with our RSA Ch. 123:1 N.H. Secretary of State, as from 1-8-17 U.S. and HOW "they" can legally spend $money from our taxes for these ILLEGAL trips to, at and back from Portland, Maine in violation of 18USC3232:

                     "January 4, 2009

Fax No. (202)224-9516

Justin C. Pentenrieder, Hearing Clerk
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Attn:  Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman

   On December 5, 2008 I attended a Judiciary Committee Field Hearing in St. Albans,
VT, chaired by Senator Patrick Leahy. I request that you forward this correspondence to him.

Dear Senator Leahy,

      On December 5, 2008 I attended a Judiciary Committee Field Hearing in St. Albans,
VT. re: "Community-Based Solutions to Drug-Related Crime in Rural America."
I submitted testimony, documentation and a demand for a full investigation into drug related crimes and violations of law, rights and due process. I am quite disappointed that I was not afforded the opportunity to speak with you. Your only response to me was that you would read my documents
on the plane. The evidence/documents presented to you demands a full investigation into the cover
up of drug-related crimes, including a death, and extends from New Hampshire to Washington agencies, ie., DOJ, FBI, US Attorneys Executive Office, H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel - Office of Professional Responsibility, NH U.S.A.G. Thomas Colantuono and Asst. U.S.A.G. Mark
Zuckerman, and others. I have had no response from you regarding this matter. Concerns by the
Police Chief of St. Albans, Gary Taylor, were the New York and Canadian borders. He, apparently,
is not aware of the activities in his neighboring N.H. border. I have given you this information/documentation for investigation.

   Secondly, I direct your attention to
http://www.cchr.org/#/videos/making-a-killing-introduction "Making a Killing."  This will answer
questions posed by you and witnesses who presented testimony at the field hearing. Quite
revealing!

   Thirdly, I presented to you correspondences to the N.H. U.S.A.G.'s office which
outlined my legitimate demand for investigation, indictment and prosecution of the following:

Death (drug related); cover up
Theft By Deception
Interstate transportation of stolen property
Official Corruption
Obstruction of justice, abuse of discretion and malfeasance of office by New Hampshire and New Jersey officials/agencies
Violations of Elder Abuse Laws and the Americans with
Disabilities Act by Department of Human Services
Theft of N.J. subsidized housing in furtherance of these crimes
False swearing on an official document

All crimes stated in this summary are indictable offenses.  This has also been sent to the Office
of Inspector General and was forwarded to the U.S. Attorneys Office in Washington.

   On October 14, 2008 I received correspondence from NH Asst. U.S. Attorney Mark
Zuckerman regarding my request for his review of his investigation into a drug related death
in N.H. He advised me that his "office will treat (my) request as a FOIA and forwarded my "FOIA"
to the FOIA/PA Unit, Office of Legal Services, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. If I
had questions, I should contact that office. A couple of days later I received correspondence from
William G. Stewart II, Asst. Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for U.S.
Attorney, Freedom of Information & Privacy Staff, Washington, DC., and a FOIA/PA form
regarding this matter.

   On November 14, 2008 I called this office. I learned that a request had already been
forwarded to the NH U.S.A.G.'s office. I was a little confused, as I had not sent back my FOIA
request. I explained to the person in that office that all that I requested were the documents
relative to N.H. Asst. U.S. Attorney Mark Zuckerman's investigation/review. I faxed this person
my specific request.

   On, or about, December 12, 2008 I received a packet from the FOIA/PA office of the
information that they received from the NH U.S.A.G.'s office regarding my request for
"documents relative to N.H. Asst. U.S. Attorney Mark Zuckerman's investigation/review."
The documents that I received, I already am in possession of. THIS IS NOT AN INVESTIGATIVE REPORT! NO INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED! I DEMAND A FULL INVESTIGATION.

   As my documentation reveals, the U.S. District Courts justices have failed miserably
in their duties and obligations. The above stated crimes were presented before a Justice in the
N.H. U.S. District Court with a request for a Federal Grand Jury investigation. The judge did
not have authority to do so. Instructions were to go to the NH U.S.A.G.'s office and the results
are stated above.

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3332(b), District Courts are authorized to impanel additional
special grand juries when the special grand juries already impaneled have more business than
they can properly handle. When impaneling additional special grand juries, a court should make
a finding as to the need; and a court should always make it clear that the special grand jury is being impaneled under 18 U.S.C. § 3331 (and is therefore not subject to the limitations of a
regular grand jury). See Wax v. Motley, 510 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1975)..
 
The special grand jury has a duty under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) "to inquire into offenses
against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district."
Such alleged offenses may be brought to the jury's attention by the court or by any attorney
appearing for the United States to present evidence to the jury. It is incumbent upon any such government attorney to whom it is reported that a Federal offense was committed within the
district, if the source of information so requests, to refer the information to the special grand jury,
naming the source and apprising the jury of the attorney's action or recommendation regarding the information. [cited in USAM 9-11.101; USAM 9-11.300]

Senator Leahy, you are the Senate Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, as well as a
member of the law making body of this country and an attorney. Is there not obstruction of
justice within the judicial system and U.S. law enforcement, whose members you and your
colleagues nominate?

I will anticipate a response and immediate action taken on this most serious, egregious
travesty of justice. I thank you for your attention to this most serious matter which is long overdue.

   Additionally, in the few weeks President elect Obama will submit the name of Eric Holder for Congressional approval to become the next Attorney General of the United States.  Congress will have to approve Mr. Holder for the job after confirmation hearings during which Mr. Holder will be asked numerous questions by the Senate Judiciary Committee.  I request the questions, attached herein, be asked of Mr. Holder.  I believe these questions will help establish the quality of his leadership at the DOJ and his respect for the written law.

               Sincerely,

               Dorothy Lafortune
               P.O. Box 187
               Biddeford, ME 04005

CC: others

Questions for Eric Holder
 

1.  Do you believe it is the responsibility of U.S. Attorneys to enforce the laws of the U.S.as they are written?

2. If the law contains the word "shall" do you believe the law relieves a U.S. Attorney from using any discretion for the enforcement of the law?

3. 18 USC 3332. states:
   
  (a) It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district.
Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence.
 
Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney's action or recommendation. (b) Whenever the district court determines that the volume of business of the special grand jury exceeds the capacity of the grand jury to discharge its obligations, the district court may order an additional special grand jury for that district to be impaneled.

 4. What is your interpretation of the requirement for a U.S. Attorney to enforce this law?

5. What do you believe the purpose of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Resource Manual is?

6. The U.S. Attorney Criminal Resource Manual 158 states:
      
 
158
Impaneling Special Grand Juries
As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3331(a), the district court in every judicial district having more than four million inhabitants must impanel a special grand jury at least once every eighteen months (unless a special grand jury is then sitting); and the district court must also impanel a special grand jury when the Attorney General, Dep uty Attorney General, or a designated Assistant Attorney General certifies in writing to the chief judge of the district that in his/her judgment, a special grand jury is necessary "because of criminal activity in the district." (See 28 C.F.R. § 0.59 under which the Assistant Attorn ey General in charge of the Criminal Division is20designated to make certifications under 18 U.S.C. § 3331.)
 
 District courts are authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(b) to impanel additional special grand juries when the special grand juries already impaneled have more business than they can properly handle. When impaneling additional special grand juries, a court should make a finding as to the need; and a court should always make it clear that the special grand jury is being impaneled under 18 U.S.C. § 3331 (and is therefore not subject to the limitations of a regular grand jury). See Wax v. Motley, 510 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1975)..
 
The special grand jury has a duty under 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) "to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district." Such alleged offenses may be brought to the jury's attention by the court or by any attorney appearing for the United States to present evidence to the jury. It is incumbent upon any such government attorney to whom it is reported that a Federal offense was committed within the district, if the source of information so requests, to refer the information to the special grand jury, naming the source and apprising the jury of the attorney's action or recommendation regarding the information.
[cited in USAM 9-11.101; USAM 9-11.300]
 
7. 18 USC 242 states:
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected=2 0by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
 
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
 
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts commit ed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kid naping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

  8. Do you believe Federal Judges as well as U.S. attorneys can be held accountable for their actions under 18 USC 242 if they fail to  enforce 18 USC 3332? 

9. Please describe the process th at you envision to enforce this conduct.

10. How would you hold U.S Attorneys accountable for their violation of the law and what action would you take if they failed to adhere to the requirements of 18 USC 3332 and/or  the U.S. Attorney Criminal Resource Manual?

11. Who would determine the extent of any punishment?

!2. What do you believe punishment does?"

[JosephSHaas]

A Christmas Card to: Warren Dowaliby, Superintendent of the Strafford County Jail in Dover, New Hampshire.

GREETINGS & Good Will* Toward Men...is what most people say, but that after watching last night's Joel Osteen program on the Family Channel 66 here I do use another phrase where the letter W and the word Good canNOT be taken OFF so easily as to erase such to leave "ill Toward Men" or Mankind, and that is:

GREETINGS & Well being Toward Men, because this is the definition of a "bode" from the word auger or presage, as in a Roman auger or one who is in charge of interpreting omens, an omen being to hear, from the word monstrance as in the word benediction as in to "well-say" of an advantage (rather than dis-advantage), like the blessing over a prayer, as certified by the minister in a church.  Us to pursue with benedictions (in the plural) those who pursue us with hatred* and curses.**

Or in other words: * to detest the test, and **profane*** an oath, as in to make said oath not pure, as in to impure**** it, defined as: in to dirty the oath, make it not clean, but contaminated by as a mixture of something, like  consisting of diverse elements in a blend of substances not BOUND***** to each other, as in the past participle of bind, as to be confined by bonds, under obligation.

Thus for the County to bind itself with some woman in Washington, D.C. to take in federal inmates is an un- bound (as the noun for this word), or in other words not within but without, as in out of bounds, beyond boundaries, and a transgressing of conventional****** limits, the convention or agreement or compact, supposed to be a concord of an accord******* or con-currence, from the Latin word concors "of the same mind", an arrangement between parties, but more than that of to be in harmony as in  "A PLEASING combination of parts or elements." (emphasis ADDed...

...So YES it is pleasing or glad, as in feeling, showing, or giving joy and pleasure when both sides are happy and willing, as the enjoyment or satisfaction that the will or desire of: "may it please the court", but that the case in Superior Court is to ONE STEP BEYOND this "will" to that of the jury for a well-being, and any "opinion" of a will need not be taken by the plaintiff from either the bench OR bar, but laid upon those jurors to decide this monstrance in like an Article 32, N.H. Re-monstrance if need be to deal with Art. 14 "complete"ness!

So let my GREETINGS include a "Joy to the World" that includes this Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 U.S. Constitution "Consent" by N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 as having been consented to by us, but of the type of a conditional consent or offer of such that we can individually waive if we "want", but not need to do as under some order, since The N.H. Legislature or General Court pre-scribed for what the Feds must do in order to MAKE such an order upon us valid, and that is to have to file their 40USC255 to 40USC3112 papers with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State that has NOT been accomplished.

And let us be in accord: a settlement of conflicting opinions between us, as from the VL or Vulgar Latin of accordare "to be heart-to-heart with", and not only that of compassion or "A deep feeling of sharing the suffering of another; mercy", as in "to sympathize with", the word sympathy defined as: (1) "Mutual understanding between persons" and (2) "A feeling or expression of pity or sorrow for the distress of another; compassion" plus (3) "Favor; agreement; approval: in sympathy with one's ideas" but ONE STEP BEYOND the mere "favor" to what's called "rigor jurus" of that called for not by our opinions but of what the law is! BUT beyond just the word heart of the essence as in: "the heart of the problem", but to be "at heart" in that phrase of to be in addition to the essential of also to that of the fundamental, of: the basic, central and KEY [ * ], plus primary, as in: the physical "Of or pertaining to the component of LOWest frequency of a periodic wave or quantity." From the Latin word fundus, of "bottom". 

And so back to what Pastor Joel Osteen said of in reading from Roman 12:19 of to open a path to allow anger to not be reflected back in revenge, but to allow it to proceed onto God Almighty Himself for to avenge in His way, and so the reason for why I've asked of what exact words this Assistant County Attorney did pre-scribe in his RSA Ch. 311:6 oath of to either "So help me God" or to be under the pains and penalty of perjury for when he puts his hand or hands together with this Board of Commissioners to help them continue to violate their RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office, for which violation thereof, they are to be "forthwith dismissed".

My "THE HOLY BIBLE WITH A Devotional and Practical COMMENTARY By the Rev. R. Jamison, D.D [ ** ] & the Rev. E.H. Bickersteth, A.M." with writing therein back to 1870 of this a "Bible of my family" and "WITH ILLUSTRATIVE ENGRAVINGS ON STEEL" from "JAMES S. VIRTUE, CITY ROAD AND IVY LANE" in LONDON @ page 259 for Romans 12:19 reads that of to "learn much from the poorest and the lowest", as in the fundamental too, and so my cherish-ments to Art. 83 education having been stolen too!!

[ ** ] "MINISTER OF ST. PAUL'S PARISH, GLASGOW; AUTHOR OF "EASTERN MANNERS ILLUSTRATIVE OF THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS," "THE MANNERS AND TRIALS OF THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANS," ETC. ETC."

"Merry Christmas" indeed for you to use this "KEY" [ *] and THE Executive key accordingly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

pc: Edward-Lewis Brown, Strafford County H.O.C. (House of "Correction"), 266 County Farm Road, Dover, N.H. 03820, Tel. 603: 742-3310; and;

Pastor Joel Osteen c/o Lakewood Church, P.O. Box 23297, Houston, Texas 77228, 713: 635-4154 General at Lakewood dot cc , http://www.lakewood.cc/

[JosephSHaas]

Here's another copy and paste:

"FW: BPA: Bottles and cans...beware
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Mon 12/21/09 11:53 AM
To:    __________________
______: Happy New Year! too, -- Joe

From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: _____________________
CC: _______________________________
Subject: FW: BPA: Bottles and cans...beware
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:51:55 -0500

F.Y.I.  Have a "Merry*" (and "Healthy") Christmas! -- Joe

* "Joy to the World" - happiness in that you know you'll get "better" as off the "can". (;-)

From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: _____________________
Subject: RE: BPA: Bottles and cans...beware
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:48:00 -0500

Thanks _______.

Re:
http://www.therealfoodchannel.com/page/38.html

of 10:00 minutes , about WHERE $80 million of our tax money went to PRE-vent the testing of these 15,000 chemicals, with only 73 chemicals,  after the two lawsuits, having been tested to this day, and for BPA in year 2010 (next year) AFTER the damage has been done, re: the lining within plastic and cans, is why I drink from glass bottles.

Remember #__ years ago the warnings of getting Alzheimer's disease from aluminum cans?

Now to avoid cans AND plastic bottles until this substance is removed.

If not then sort of like "The Island of Dr. Moreau" in reality of deformations from birth, and as we age.

Thank you "very" much! - - Joe

forward of this onto others later...

From: _______________
To: _____________
Subject: FW: BPA: Bottles and cans...beware
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:51:58 +0000

ALL Federal Alphabet Agenices ....

> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:43:35 -0500
> To: _________________
> From: newsletter at therealfoodchannel.com
> Subject: BPA: Bottles and cans...beware
>
> ____________
>
> Here's a simple principle for good eating.
>
> "If it comes in a box, a bag, a bottle, or a can
> it's automatically suspect.
>
> The only safe place in the supermarket is
> the produce department."
>
> The subject of BPA - a plastic used in virtually
> all cans and bottles - comes up from time to
> time and then is quieted down.
>
> Here's what you need to know about it and
> why it's so hard to get the straight story.
>
> A textbook case of food industry manipulation
> of science and regulation.
>
> Video:
>
> http://www.therealfoodchannel.com/page/38.html
>
> Ken McCarthy
>
> Amacord, Inc.
> 14 North Road,
> Tivoli, NY 12583, USA
>
> To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
> http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?nIxsrIyctCysrByM7GzstGa0LJxsbEwsbA==

[Mike Barskey]

I sent mail to Ed at the following address and it was returned:

Edward-Lewis Brown
#03923-049
FMC Devens
Federal Medical Center
P.O. Box 879
Ayer, MA  01432

Where is he now?

[jzacker]

did Mr. Brown get sentenced yet?  and are the Browns appealing at all? 

[JosephSHaas]

Ed is in Dover, N.H. until the sentencing on January (?) __, 2010.

[Mike Barskey]

Which jail/prison is he in? Or, if you know the mailing address for Ed there, what is that?

Relatively recently, he was in MA:

615 pages of this thread is too much to look through manually. Does anyone know the current jail/prison that Ed is in? How about Elaine?

Ed is in Massachusetts at the Devens facility for the next couple of weeks undergoing a pychiatric evaluation.  Assuming he's found mentally competent, he'll be sentenced later this year in Concord, NH.

Elaine has already been sentenced and is "in transit" for the time being.  She's probably on the road to the same Texas prison where she was kept prior to this last trial.  Unless she's told someone here, there's no way of knowing where she'll end up until she gts there.

Ed's address is in Reply #9184 on page 613:

INMATE NAME & REGISTER NUMBER*
FMC DEVENS
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
P.O. BOX 879
AYER, MA  01432

* Edward-Lewis: Brown #03923-049

Thanks for updated info.

[JosephSHaas]

A 2-step process?

I did just call the Strafford County Jail in Dover @ 742-3310 at 8:12 a.m. this morning and that the man at the front desk would not tell me HOW this process works to determine the status there of ANY visitor of: (1) first whether they are on the visitor list, and (2) second of whether they have been suspended.  Is the visitor's name listed WITH an asterisk? As in YES - you're on the list BUT that you're prohibited until further notice. Just HOW is this information made available?  The guard REFUSED to answer the general question, and asked me for my last name to go into NOT a general question BUT for a specific.  I gave him: Haas, and he said immediately (within half a second) that I was not allowed.  So "they" all must have been given instructions that if and whenever I call in the future of: don't bother to "check", just tell him no, off the top of your head; a standing order to say no.  But this specific question does not answer the general question.  The guard said that the WAY they conduct business is NOT available for me as an answer to my question because it's a "security" issue or concern.  And so I did ask to speak with the Superintendent Dowaliby, but that I was merely connected to his voice mail, and left a message that he get back to me for what I think is a cause, of be-cause of when this happened twice before, it must have been negligence on the part of those two other guards who were either: (1)  too lazy to "check" on this two step process, or (2) who were never told about HOW to do a COMPLETE "check" of verification of YES on the list, BUT of NO when suspended, and so the answer to anybody calling in with a question of whether or not they can visit THAT day of calling, the answer is based upon BOTH criteria.

You'd think that the Assistant County Attorney would have inquired of this and found out this report of some disciplinary action or demerit check-mark against these two individuals for those two days when they told me otherwise, but who have since been "corrected".  But: no, he either did not call over there to find this out, or is in a cover-up mode, and now into his Motion to Dismiss my civil case for FAILure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted.  He stated this in court last Tuesday morning that he could NOT answer either ADMITed or DENIED to my claim of having been WRONGfully told that I could visit THAT day of calling BUT that when I arrived, two more guards were there added to the original or another to say that that first answer of YES had been changed to NO be-cause of this process having NOT been completed by the one who I had talked on the phone with earlier who gave me erroneous information.  As in the "errors and omissions" clause in all insurance policies.

So this is the reason of my lawsuit of be-cause of error or omission both on the part of the instructor and the student, plus back to the Commissioners because of the reason WHY I've been suspended being some federal policy over-ride of my Article 12 rights in that there has been no 40USC255 to 40USC3112 federal filing as required by the "shall" word in N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 for "Consent" from Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution, of which they took an RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to obey "Complete"ly by Article 14 of the N.H. Constitution. Thus in addition to this negligence of error or omission, also to that of KNOWingly with a purpose to evade Article 12, since this was told to them by me at a Commissioner's Meeting,  puts them in a culpable state of mind of which to sue for their deciding to violate their oaths of office!

A copy of this printout and other documents returned by the Clerk because of lack of a cover sheet with the information as double spaced with side margins given a title up top. To staple them to my OBJECTION to the 12/18 Motion to Dismiss, to file within the next ten (10) days by Monday, December 28th. To either agree with this objection to DENY the Motion, but if not then to proceed to a hearing.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - -  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

pc: Edward-Lewis: Brown, Strafford County H.O.C., 266 County Farm Road, Dover, N.H. 03820.

[Mike Barskey]

Thanks for the effort and the information!

[JosephSHaas]

Update: ....

...

pc: Edward-Lewis: Brown, Strafford County H.O.C., 266 County Farm Road, Dover, N.H. 03820, Tel. 603: 742-3310....

Mike WHY do you go back to October 20th that is OVER two months ago!?

That is NOT his CURRENT address!

His LAST known address posted here by me was on December 9th and it has NOT changed.

I called Bernie last night and he visited Ed over the weekend with Marie and Ed told them who told me who I'm now telling you all here that Ed has YET to get a copy of either the doctor's report on the psycho-val TOWARD the Gov't P.S.I. to which the defendant, by the rules, has #__ days to digest and counter BEFORE any Sentencing Hearing.

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Thanks for the effort and the information!

You're welcome.  I presume you read all my stuff, or at least that pc: to Ed with his current address stood out like a red-flag! 

I saw that somebody (you) had posted something, and with that warning when I pressed the publish button that I could revise what I did write, but chose otherwise to ignore that and wait to reply later, that I'm doing now.

Plus: I did also call the Jail again and left a further voice mail for the Assistant Superintendent Bird (Sid Bird), Super Bird, to find out if beyond an asterisk to some footnote at the bottom of THAT page or does the person who checks have to go to ANOTHER page on the computer screen to compare that to some information in another column of information?

Does ANYbody here KNOW of HOW this is done? Like a former guard reading this of like for example we did or do it like: _____________________ in the ________ County or within another state.

Thanks.

[JosephSHaas]

Legislative Facilities of Concord just banned what Ed used to bring to there: his concealed weapon.  See my reply to such over at "The Concord Monitor", and I can send anybody my e-mail chain-of-contact with detailed info from the NH Liberty Seacoast group, like this summary and more:

"NRA ALERT AS WELL:

Gun Ban Put into Effect at New Hampshire State House
Please Contact the Members of the Joint Committee on Legislative Facilities Today!
Yesterday, the Joint Committee on Legislative Facilities voted 8-3 to take away our Second Amendment rights while in the State Capitol complex.  The newly enacted regulation states:

"No person, except for law enforcement personnel in active duty, shall carry a firearm or other dangerous or deadly weapon or an explosive, openly or concealed, while inside the State House, the Legislative Office Building, the Upham Walker House, or any of the underground tunnels connected to these buildings. Law enforcement personnel, when requested by State House security staff, must produce sufficient identification establishing their status as law enforcement personnel."

In 2008, the legislature voted down similar legislation overwhelmingly.  Unfortunately this week, a handful of legislators passed a regulation in committee and created this new "victim zone" without notice.

Please contact your State Legislators and the members of the Joint Committee on Legislative Facilities TODAY and respectfully urge them to re-consider their attack on our Second Amendment rights.  Contact information for the committee can be found below.  To find contact information for your State Legislators, please click here."