Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 34

[keith in RI]

12/21/2009 NOTICE OF HEARING as to Edward Brown: Competency Hearing and Sentencing set for 1/11/2010 08:00 AM before Judge George Z. Singal, USDC-NH. (dae) (Entered: 12/21/2009)

[JosephSHaas]

"Is That a Knife"
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
0:47 seconds  336,406

[JosephSHaas]

First Draft lawsuit:

To: The Strafford County Superior Court
Strafford County Justice & Administration Building
259 County Farm Road
P.O. Box 799
Dover, NH 03820-0799

Clerk : Julie W. Howard
Phone : (603) 742-3065
Hours : Monday - Friday, 8:30am to 4:00pm
http://www.courts.state.nh.us/courtlocations/straffsupedir.htm

Petition for Damages of $2,500 per day since Oct. 4, 2007 of wrongful incarceration and federal prosecution against the Plaintiff and the laws and statutes of this state of New Hampshire and of the United States of America

Edward-Lewis: Brown
266 County Farm Road
Dover, N.H. 03820
603: 742-3310

v.

John P. Kacavas
http://www.mainjustice.com/2009/08/13/three-obama-us-attorneys-sworn-in/

formerly of The Law Firm of:
Kacavas Ramsdell & Howard,
175 Canal Street
Manchester New Hampshire [ NH ] 03101
Phone Number: (603)625-1254
http://uslawyersdb.com/attorney15851

and now of: The Office of U.S. Attorney
James C. Cleveland Building
55 Pleasant Street
enter 53 Pleasant Street
Concord, N.H. 03301
603: 225-1552
http://www.justice.gov/usao/nh/

Bar No. ______________

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Edward-Lewis: Brown, an Article 12 "inhabitant" of the City of Dover, County of Strafford, and state of New Hampshire http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html (and specifically for the words in the last sentence thereof of: "Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent.* ) and complains as follows:

1.) That on December ____ 2009 / January ____ 2010 having THOUGHT about WHY the Judge in the case of Joseph S. Haas v. Board of Strafford County Commissioners, Docket No. 219-2009-CV-00614, had NOT opened up an Equity case #2009-E-____ to have been entitled: Brown v. Warren Dowaliby, Superintendent for being in violation of the law, as requested therein the civil case by Mr. Haas to either be done by the initiative of the judge sua sponte and/or some motion for relief down from the over $3,300 claimed therein to a settlement of: $1.00; and;

2.) That N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 311:6   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXX/311/311-6.htm reads that: "Every attorney admitted to practice shall take and subscribe, in open court, the oaths to support the constitution of this state and of the United States, and the oath of office in the following form: You solemnly swear or affirm that you will do no falsehood, nor consent that any be done in the court, and if you know of any, that you will give knowledge thereof to the justices of the court, or some of them, that it may be reformed; THAT YOU WILL NOT WITTINGLY OR WILLINGLY PROMOTE, SUE, OR PROCURE TO BE SUED ANY false or UNLAWFUL SUIT, nor consent to the same; that you will delay no person for lucre or malice, and will act in the office of an attorney within the court according to the best of your learning and discretion, and with all good fidelity as well to the court as to your client. So help you God or under the pains and penalty of perjury. " (emphasis ADDed.); (see photocopy of the Defendant's RSA 311:6 oath attached hereto) and that:

3. ) evidence in the form of a Certificate of Federal Non-Filing to N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm was presented to BOTH (1) this tenant: Attorney Kacavas on December __, 2009 with a request to nol-pros the current case #______________ there in the Warren B. Rudman Building because of the fact that (2) the Feds, in the form of it's landlord Stephen R. Leeds, Acting Administrator of The General Services Administration as of Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009, the new "head", see:   http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=11164&contentType=GSA_BASIC and http://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contactus.do for his address of: "U.S. General Services Administration, 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405" with same telephone number of  (202) 501-0800 and e-mail address of:  judith.larsen at gsa dot gov have yet to accept our Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Conditional "Consent"* or offer of June 14, 1883 by filing the necessary 40USC255 to Title 40 U.S. Code Section 3112 federal papers with Bill Gardner's N.H. Office of Secretary of State (2nd floor, State House, 107 North Main Street, Room 204, Concord, N.H.  03301,
Phone: 603-271-3242, Email: Elections@sos.state.nh.us http://www.sos.nh.gov/   ) per the "shall" word in the statute; former Acting Administrator of the G.S.A. Paul F. Prouty, having last been contacted about this to his subordinate ralph.conner at gsa dot gov on Thursday, November 19th, 2009 @ 11:27 o'clock p.m. in an e-mail from Mr. Haas per his phone call to the office from U.S. Senator Judd Gregg's Concord,N.H. office at about noontime that day and his return call to agent Conner of about 4:15 p.m. that afternoon, and with the latest contact to the G.S.A./ Attn: both Agents Larsen and Conner by e-mail of __:__ o'clock a.m. Wed., Dec. 23rd '09 by Mr. Haas, and by a photocopy of the computer printout of this First Draft lawsuit by him to the New Hampshire Underground website as Reply #_____ on page 625 at: http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.9360 along with a copy of the latest certificate of federal non-filing by it having been mailed to him by Mr. Haas on Wed., Dec. 23rd '09 @ __:__ p.m. from the Concord, N.H. Post Office to his address in Washington, D.C. as indicated above;

4.) because he ought to have known better and especially per his own U.S. Attorney Manual #664

See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/40/usc_sec_40_00003112----000-.html see also: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.h... and http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03... ** plus the original http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 for 40USC255.

** "'In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial.' Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."

WHEREFORE to please issue an Orders of Notice for a Return Day of the second Tuesday in February, of Feb. 2 (Groundhog Day), 2010, for when the Defendant shall file his Appearance Form, and Answer within thirty (30) days thereof this finalized version of this lawsuit customized by Attorney __________ of: ________________ for Mr. Haas who gave same to me, Edward-Lewis: Brown for processing to this court and that of the N.H. Dept. of Safety, http://www.nh.gov/safety/commissioner/index.html Attention: Commissioner John J. Barthelmes,  James H. Hayes Safety Building, 33 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03305, Tel. 603-271-2791 because of his and their FAILure to "Serve and PROTECT" my rights as are supposed to be a guarantee by Article 12 of our N.H. Bill of Rights, with copies of this first draft lawsuit, in addition to him by Mr. Haas @ ___:___ p.m. Wed., Dec. 23rd '09 having been delivered to Nancy Cassidy there for him or someone else being: ________ and additional copies to both: Scott Hilliard (of Northfield), Merrimack County Sheriff, http://www.ci.concord.nh.us/govmnt/county 163 N. Main Street, Concord, NH 03301, Phone: (603) 225-5451 / (603) 225-5583 @ __:__ p.m. 12/23/09 and Robert C. Barry, Chief of Police, City of Concord, 35 Green Street, Concord, N.H. 03301, Tel.  603-225-8600, Email:  police@onconcord.com   http://www.ci.concord.nh.us/Police/concordv2.asp?siteindx=H05,40 at __:__ p.m. 12/23/09 to likewise sue for a Jury Trial in Merrimack County Superior Court for going along with any federal kidnapping should it occur on or before the scheduled sentencing day of Monday, January 11th, 2010 @ 8:00 o'clock a.m. The Commissioner of Safety to be sued in the RSA Ch. 451-B:1-23 State Board of Claims http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LV-541-B.htm

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Edward-Lewis: Brown, 266 County Farm Road, Dover, N.H. 03820, Tel. 603: 742-3310

p.c.: Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

Sample Admissions by the Defendant:

In ANSWER to the charges set forth above and summarized here, I John P. Kacavas:

1. ADMIT that it is highly likely that the Plaintiff "THOUGHT" of the reason for WHY the Judge in the Haas v. Board case did NOT open up an Equity case entitled: Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; +

2. ADMIT that that is my signature on the photocopy of the attached RSA Ch. 311:6 oath, and the reason why I chose _____________ over ____________ ("So help [me]God" or "under the pains and penalty of perjury.") is because: ________________________

3. a. I ADMIT that on December __, 2009 I did receive a photocopy of the certificate of federal non-filing to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1...

b. ...with a request to nol-pros this case by Mr. Haas who did circle these words with his initials in the right side margin; +

c. After contacting the GSA Acting Administrator Leeds +/or Agent(s) ____________ on: ______________ @ ___:___ am/pm by phone/visit to: _______________ ADMIT that the GSA landlord as 40USC3112 "head" and landlord to us here as tenants of both this office and the court is in default of the laws and statutes of both the state of New Hampshire and of the United States of America. And;

4. I ADMIT that I have read the U.S. Attorney Manual #664, 40USC255, 40USC3112 and the excerpt for the Adams case and agree that I am in violation of my RSA Ch. 311:6 oath to NOT promote any unlawful suit of what this criminal case "was" (past tense), as having been nol prossed by me in my capacity as the advocate/ arguer of what was in contention, dispute and of quarrels finally agreeing that there is now no argument that there was no jurisdictional authority from the time of the arrest on Oct. 4, 2007 of Mr. Brown up until _______ __, 20___ when the 40USC3112 papers were finally filed by the GSA "head" Mr. Leeds with Bill Gardner's N.H. Office of Secretary of State.

signed: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - John P. Kacavas, with my apology that I hope is accepted as evidence toward what was supposed to be a state/county and city executive check and balance by the N.H. State Police, Merrimack County Sheriff's Office and Chief of Police for the City of Concord who should have investigated AND ORDERed us to NOT treat any of their Article 12 "inhabitants" by a wrongful prescription of the U.S. Codes since the victims had not either individually consented thereto, nor was there any "consent" by their Representatives at the Legislature or N.H. General Court.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's another copy and paste:

"Happy New Year!?
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Wed 12/23/09 8:26 AM
To:    isb at dos.nh.gov; shilliard at merrimacksheriff.net; pcavanaugh at onconcord.com; Concord Police Dept. (police at onconcord.com)
Cc:    judith.larsen at gsa.gov; ralph.conner at gsa.gov; Secretary of State - N.H. (elections at sos.state.nh.us); County Strafford (jmiccolo at co.strafford.nh.us); Citizens Service - N.H. (Lynch) (officeofcitizenservi at nh.gov); Foster's Daily Democrat (letters at fosters.com); G&C#2 (jshea at nh.gov); G&C#3 (bhollingworth at nh.gov)
Bcc: ______________________________________________

To: 1. The New Hampshire Dept. of Safety, Attn: The Commissioner and for The N.H. State Police

2. The County of Merrimack, State of New Hampshire, Attention to both: The Board of County Commissioners, AND The Sheriff, Scott Hilliard; plus:

3. The City of Concord, Attn: to BOTH the entire city c/o its Solicitor Paul Cavanaugh and the Chief of Police, Robert C. Barry

HAPPY NEW YEAR! to us, and NOT to you UNLESS you do what's right as required by your RSA Ch. 92:2 and/or RSA Ch. 42:1 oaths of office to abide by the law!

Please see the copy and paste of Reply #9374 on page 625 (my Reply #2447) over at http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.9360

As I had (paste tense) told you to do a similar executive check and balance against the Feds for my friend Elaine Brown, I do put in this Claim that you do "same" for her husband, Ed Brown, the word "same" of not what you did NOT do for her, but of the "same" word being of to protect him as hereby claimed from further wrongs by these technical trespassers withIN this state!

Hoping that you have a good new year too, but if because of your continued FAILure to do your job of which I pay taxes to you either directly or indirectly, as from my residence and/or workplace by my employer in Boscawen and Concord respectfully, then may it be a very bad new year for you to have to have your pay deducted to the moiety or half of fifty (50%) percent amount in like a Writ of Elegit for which to pay the $total as yet to file a similar lawsuit against you in the Merrimack County Superior Court for a trial by jury.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

c.c.1 : The Secretary of State, Concord, N.H. Attn: Karen Ladd. Karen: would you please have Bill sign an update to today, that of that there still being no federal filing to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1, so that I can pick it up sometime this afternoon to deliver and mail to the parties indicated here.  http://www.sos.nh.gov/ 271-3242 http://www.sos.nh.gov/

c.c.2: to both G.S.A. Agents Larsen and Conner: Would you please forward this to your new boss for his first full day on the job today, to maybe be one of his first acts of office of to finally file these papers, or get to work on filing them as required by both the state and federal constitution/ law and statutes too.

c.c.3: to the Executives being The Board of Strafford County Commissioners.  If you think that the current case of mine is troubling, just imagine what Ed can do to you with the proper attorney! Jean: Would you please relay this over to the Sheriff, Wayne Estes to maybe do a Buford Pusser "Walking Tall" upon them as by to ENFORCE the LAW over there! Finally!!

pc 1: Edward-Lewis: Brown, Strafford County H.O.C. (House of "Correction"), 266 County Farm Road, Dover, N.H. 03820, Tel.603: 742-3310

pc 2: Elaine-Alice, Brown, #03924-049, FMC Carswell, P. O. Box 27137, [ J Street, Building 3000], Forth Worth, Texas 76127
What God Hath Joined Together

President Gordon B. Hinckley
First Counselor in the First Presidency

[of The Mormon Church]


http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=2354fccf2b7db010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD&locale=0&sourceId=bf80b850e318b010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____

"...Anyone who imagines that bliss is normal is going to waste a lot of time running around shouting that he has been robbed." (Deseret News, 12 June 1973, p. A4.)


Stormy weather occasionally hits every household. Connected inevitably with the whole process is much of pain—physical, mental, and emotional. There is much of stress and struggle, of fear and worry. For most, there is the ever-haunting battle of economics. There seems never to be enough money to cover the needs of a family. Sickness strikes periodically. Accidents happen. The hand of death may reach in with dread stealth to take a precious one.


But all of this seems to be part of the processes of family life. Few indeed are those who get along without experiencing some of it. It has been so from the beginning. Cain quarreled with Abel and then did a terrible thing. How great must have been the grief in the hearts of their parents, Adam and Eve.


Absalom was the third son of David, a son favored and loved. David had given him a name which meant "father of peace." But he brought not peace—rather, anger and ambition and sorrow. He killed his brother and conspired against his father. In the midst of his evil actions, in his wicked pursuit for his father's throne, while riding a mule Absalom's head caught in the branches of an oak tree, and he was left hanging helpless. Joab, nephew of David and captain of the king's army, seizing the opportunity to get rid of this rebellious and traitorous son, pierced his heart with darts. He apparently felt he was doing a favor to the king.


But when David heard of his son's death, even though that son had conspired to destroy him, "the king was much moved, and went up to the chamber over the gate, and wept: and as he went, thus he said, O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom! would God I had died for thee, O Absalom, my son, my son! ... [And] the king covered his face, and ... cried." (2 Sam. 18:33; 2 Sam. 19:4.)


Through the history of the generations of man, the actions of rebellious children have been ladened with sorrow and heartbreak, but even when there has been rebellion, the strong cords of family life have reached out to encircle the rebellious one...."


My footnote: being that of to compare the word "rebellion" as in the Johnny Reb phrase of our country's Civil War, or WBTS/ War Between the States, to that of a Revolution, and our Article 10, N.H. Constitution Right to Revolt!  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html


http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html

Our right to revolt as as individual, or family, that word defined as not only "A group of persons related by blood or marriage" but also "A group or category of like things", and the word thing meaning an entity or creature, as in either of three definitions: (1) "An animal", (2) "A person, esp. one regarded with pity or CONTEMPT" (emphasis ADDed), or (3) "One subservient to another", as in the creator always superior to its created being of the creature, and so when we the people form our creature of government it is supposed to be subservient or subordinate, as in servile to us.  The word subordinate defined as "1. Belonging to a lower or inferior class or rank. 2. Subject to the authority or control of another. 3. Gram. Dependent on another clause."

So, yes, our public servants dependent upon the contract: their oath of office to follow the rules of the game!  The law being the constitutions and the statutes too.  Thus you public servants canNOT act alone!  You are dependent, and so I say to you Dependent: "Determined by something or someone else." So if you who take the 311:6 oath are NOT dependent upon being bound to be UNDER "the pains and penalty of perjury" being a Class B Felony in this state for violation of same, then you said and signed "So hlelp [me] God" or did you?  I only see a signature that you did one or the other but not both as there is the "or" word there, so which one was it and is?  The former or the latter?  Of to be withIN God at this 4th dimensional plain of existence of a part of realty to be Ruled by Him of which you agree to operate by His Rules; or to be subject to your fellow man as determined by a jury of your peers in a criminal trial?  The answer needed as to determine whether you will or will not answer the questions in a civil suit for damages because that would be incriminating yourself in a subsequent criminal case.

Us all withIN the family of men, just that like George Orwell wrote about in his book entitled: "Animal Farm": some animals are more equal than others.  The "animals" of contempt by those revolting determined to be so classified by those in the subordinate level attempting to elevate themselves to over their master by by-passing the rules!  Such I find disgusting and to be dealt with accordingly if you don't "wise up" and do what's right right here and now!

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[Kat Kanning]

12/21/2009 NOTICE OF HEARING as to Edward Brown: Competency Hearing and Sentencing set for 1/11/2010 08:00 AM before Judge George Z. Singal, USDC-NH. (dae) (Entered: 12/21/2009)

Thanks for info.

[JosephSHaas]

12/21/2009 NOTICE OF HEARING as to Edward Brown: Competency Hearing and Sentencing set for 1/11/2010 08:00 AM before Judge George Z. Singal, USDC-NH. (dae) (Entered: 12/21/2009)

Thanks for info.

The Article 12 N.H. Judge to the rescue*.

This will be a non-event.  Concord will NOT see Ed on Mon., Jan 11th. 

Yesterday I did deliver signed copies of my "Happy New Year!" to the County Attorney's Office on Court Street, Concord for the Commissioners now in Boscawen, and to both the receptionist at City Hall for The City of Concord, Attn: Paul Cavanaugh, the City Solicitor and to the window clerk at the Police Station next door on Green Street for the Chief.

I then went across the street and picked up yet another signed copy of a statement from the Deputy Secretary of State David M.. Scanlan on his letterhead that as of today's date then of December 23rd '09 "We have checked our records and do not find a copy of the filing required by RSA 123:1."

I did also mail same of this 8-page packet that includes the the GSA website page for the new "head" Stephen R. Leeds and my "First Draft lawsuit" to the Feds both here in N.H. of the U.S. Attorney John P. Kacavas and the new GSA "head" of Leeds in Washington, to give more Feds copies on Monday by delivery to both: Gregg and Hodes in Concord too, and maybe mail same to Shaheen and Shea-Porter in Dover.

Plus the County of Merrimack now has notice to share accordingly but may also see to it that the Sheriff and Commissioners gets this personally delivered to him and them too, and to back-up the e-mail copy of to the N.H. Dept. of Safety and State Police also.

THEN "if" there is no executive check-and-balance by either the local, county or state here against the Feds who now KNOW what they're doing is WRONG in their Article III inferior court of Congress KNOWing too, #__ times now, THEN to sue the City of Concord in Merrimack County Superior Court, the County in the Federal court WHEN it is legit, and the State in the State Board of Claims, plus Feds in the Court of Claims for FAILure to perform their duties in a lawful way: violation of contract.

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

P.S. * See Re-type of my latest Motion in the Strafford County Superior Court Case #219-2009-cv-614 to follow...

[JosephSHaas]

Here's my re-type:

"The State of New Hampshire
Strafford County Superior Court
P.O. Box 799
Dover, N.H. 03821-0799
(603) 742-3065
Docket No. 219-2009-cv-614
Joseph S. Haas v. Board of Strafford County Commissioners

MOTION TO ATTACH THE BODY

--NOW COMES the Plaintiff Haas next in the chain-of-events after having been denied the Motion to Attach the federal funds tendered to the County and as a possible settlement of not $money, but the recovery of lost or stolen visiting times of to be re-stored (maybe to the 7th degree too - as illustrated already with the mere citing of RSA Ch. 651:63 not that the statute itself from the criminal realm applies to this civil case; with OBJECTION to said Motion to Dismiss of 12/18 to follow by Mon., 12/28 postmark, as awaiting written word from the Superintendent from the Assistant Sid Bird's call to me today @ about 3:00 p.m. on this matter of negligence in the verification process for a visitor is a "2-step process" of first on the list as approved, and then by cross-check of a suspended note applied thereto), hereby asks this court to please ORDER that the body of one: Edward-Lewis: Brown NOT be shipped out by or to the Feds based upon the information that I did present to this court, but that was returned by the clerk as not double-spaced, and so if this MOTION be NOT granted, as in IF the Assistant County Attorney does OBJECT to this latest Motion, that a hearing be held and BEFORE the Federal hearing as scheduled for sentencing on Monday, January 11th @ 8:00 o'clock a.m.  Attached hereto is more related information as labeled "Happy New Year!" on eight [8] pages to act as an Exhibit.

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com, 603: 848-6059 (cell phone)

pc: Stephen G. LaBonte, Assistant, N.H. Bar #16178, whose RSA 311:6 oath is in-complete!, P.O. Box 799, Dover, N.H. 03821

& Edward-Lewis: Brown"

note: I did also send a copy of all of this to Elaine too, in Texas. Plus a courtesy copy to the U.S. Attorney John P. Kacavas in Concord.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091223/NEWS01/912230310&template=single

entitled: "State has history of corruption to federal ways!"

of: "Reference: "state...Examiners also wrote that Farah...failed to provide a copy of his company's federal tax return,as he was required* to do. "

* oh really!? WHERE is it spelled out that this is necessary as need?

How many state examiners? #__ what are their names? And may I please see a copy of their reports, or is this one of those RSA Ch. 91-A financial exemptions? If so, would the company president please send me a copy of this attempted extortion.

Thus a printing here to help these company officials AND the investors in that the $money is someWHERE waiting to be put to work WHEN the door of opportunity opens.  And as by the words in my Archives here, that starts 1-1-10 in just over a week away: land to buy when the rules of the game change as by Chapter #___ Laws of N.H. 2009 for  House Bill 321 of 2009 back to Senate Bill 342 of 2008 for when a majority of 51%+ of the Residential Zones in every city and town has now got to open up their lands to "Workforce Housing", as to allow to be built an affordable road, to buy an affordable lot, to build an affordable house.  No more of these prohibitions that the Class VI or private road has got to be tarred at over $100 per lineal foot so many feet wide, and especially to "restrict" (NOT prohibit) up to the maximum number of lots there already recorded, even if non-conforming, and so more power to the landowner, NOT the town for those owners of land abutting a road pre-existing BEFORE zoning got started in that town! It's the law by RSA Ch. 674:41,I(e).

As Ed Brown used to say: "SHOW ME THE LAW". So I demand/ claim and insist that you public servants provide a prompt accounting by Articles 8 + 14 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights  of WHEN our Legislature supposedly "Consent"ed to have the Article 12 "inhabitant"s of this state to be controllable by any of these U.S. Codes or Statutes At Large! Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution.

As Robert Conrad used to say for that EverReady Battery T.V. commercial  I dare you!  I dare you to knock THIS off.  The THIS being of OUR rights here in New Hampshire! to which you TRY to do-away with!  Disgusting, absolutely disgusting: a clear violation of your RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office, for which YOU are to be "dismissed forthwith"! Do not pass go, do not continue to harass people here in this state with federal statutes that have no bearing on us...that is UNTIL they do by their RSA Ch. 123:1 federal filing of the 40USC255 to 40USC3112 federal papers with our N.H. Office of Secretary of State to where these companies do file their names there, and so when one party be in default, as in it takes two to tango, the dance is over: case closed, or at least as far as that line of attack goes insisting upon federal paperwork! "

[JosephSHaas]

Merry Christmas!

from: 1.) Andy Williams and his song of telling "scary ghost stories"* too;

* "It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year-Andy Williams"
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

http : // www dot youtube dot com/watch?v=L2urlriwjcg&feature=related
of 2:31 minutes  312,907 views @ :58 seconds + 1:44 minute
[that he sang again from the stage today by the parade; T.V. Channel 20 @ noon];

plus: 2.) speaking of horror stories, remember the 1990 murder of Lucien Fogg at his home in Franklin, N.H. by Carl Laurie?

I had visited Lucien before this as a fellow victim of Town Tax Sale corruption from Ashland when I read about his case in the newspapers...

...the latest newspaper account being from The "Concord Monitor" of last year: Friday, October 31st (Halloween) 2008 @ pages A1+6 telling about his escape from a State Prison detail and recapture.

He was scheduled for life without parole, but that because the Franklin C.O.P. was corrupt, he got 30 years 2nd** instead of 1st degree murder based upon this and what they now call "the Laurie Decision".

** "second degree murder means a person knowingly*** but not purposely****, committed the crime."

Or in other words what I call the Laurie Excuse as used by civil servants.  This excuse used by "them" when they are in the know*** as needing this:

The taming of the artful shrew, as opposed to science.

Thus do you want your local, county and state government agents to run on art or science?

It's currently running on art, that is against the law! The word science is of a discipline*****  of controlled behavior!

Thus the artist paints on his canvas beyond the margins, but that the public servant is supposed to be bound by his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office (see also 42:1 for the locals) to be withIN the bounds of THE law being THE constitution!

So case in point as an example of when I did meet with the Strafford County Commissioners.  They wanted to continue their "artful dodger" shenanigans, http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_701704359/artful_dodger.html "somebody good at avoidance: somebody skilled at avoiding difficult situations and having to answer questions *** [After a young pickpocket in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens]".

Therefore it being a Charles Dickens time of year with not only "A Christmas Carol", but this "Oliver Twist" story too.

**** They, through their attorney, the Assistant County Attorney, REFUSE to either ADMIT or DENY my charges in the civil case against them in Superior Court.  They refuse to give an Articles 8 + 14 prompt accounting that there was negligence in this "2-step process" of visitation of first on the list and THEN any suspension, and the latter based upon faulty reasoning that a federal policy can over-ride our rights here as supposed to be a guarantee by Article 12 in our N.H. Bill of Rights!

My meeting with the Commissioners to formulate this purpose of a resolution being another definition for this "purpose" word.  A resolution being a formal statement of a decision put before or adopted by an assembly.  My resolution request and claim that they do honor their oaths by supporting Article 12 for ALL inhabitants, not just the free ones as per the Articles of Confederation of the several states, including New Hampshire that WAS (past tense) the operational guide book BEFORE the adoption of the United States Constitution of which they took an oath to obey BOTH these documents and not this metamorphosis middle ground of development to maturity like the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat; See  http://www.worldofquotes.com/author/Theodore-Roosevelt/1/index.html  for Teddy Roosevelt's actual words of: "Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much because they live in the grey twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat. "

***** discipline = "3. A state of order based upon submission to rules and authority."

As in a "Point of Order"! Haas to Federal Court (had I not been forcefully re-moved upon saying this, and that is: WHERE are your operating papers? Your 40USC255 to 40USC31212 federal papers of acceptance of our N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 offer of June 14, 1883 as from the "Consent" required in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution that even the U.S. Attorney KNOWS about by his Manual #664 and that U.S. Supreme Court Adams case of 1943.

See also: "4. Punishment intended to CORRECT or train" [ * ] (emphasis ADded, as training needed to be put upon "them", not us to be incarcerate behind walls withOUT any classes in a course to learn our deficiencies (as this the very definition of the word of to correct) as we have none!  The Feds' deficient in NOT supplying the paperwork! and'

5. "A set of rules or methods" as THE rule of Law!

"Happy New Year"! only to those who deserve it!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[ * ] Re: The N.H. Police Standards & Training [PS&T].... what a joke!

http://www.pstc.nh.gov/

pc: Director Donald L. Vittum    dvittum ast pstc.state.nh.us  http://www.pstc.nh.gov/contact_us.htm

1st Draft: Amendment to House/ Senate Bill #______ of 2010

Be it hereby added to this bill that because of deficiency in Article 12 protection of some (or even one) of our Article 12 inhabitants here by the Local, County and State Police that their share of 54.17% from the 24% penalty assessments in RSA Ch. 188-F:31 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/xv/188-f/188-f-31.htm be diverted to the "victims' assistance fund" making that amount now from 16.67% + 54.17% to now: 70.84%.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste:

"Attention: WHEN may I visit you next week??
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Fri 12/25/09 3:33 PM
To:    Donald C. Vittum (dvittum at pstc.state.nh.us); rstafford at pstc.state.nh.us; kroberts at pstc.state.nh.us; bjean at pstc.state.nh.us; mvarney at pstc.state.nh.us; jmulla at pstc.state.nh.us; mbodanza at pstc.state.nh.us; pmoller at pstc.state.nh.us; gtaylor at pstc.state.nh.us; jmoran at pstc.state.nh.us; eparent at pstc.state.nh.us; lames at pstc.state.nh.us; dbouvier at pstc.state.nh.us
Cc:    Concord Police Dept. (police at onconcord.com); Foster's Daily Democrat (letters at fosters.com); isb at dos.nh.gov; shilliard at merrimacksheriff.net; pcavanaugh at onconcord.com; Secretary of State - N.H. (elections at sos.state.nh.us); Citizens Service - N.H. (Lynch) (officeofcitizenservi at nh.gov)
Bcc: ________________________________________
To:

Academy Schedules | Fitness Standards | Publications & Forms | Training Calendar |

Contact US
Email links:
Director Donald L. Vittum                              dvittum at pstc.state.nh.us
Captain Robert Stafford                                 rstafford at pstc.state.nh.us Captain Kimberly Roberts                              kroberts at pstc.state.nh.us
Captain Benjamin R Jean                               bjean at pstc.state.nh.us
Captain Mark Varney                                     mvarney at pstc.state.nh.us
Lt. Jim Mulla                                                jmulla at pstc.state.nh.us
Lt. Mark Bodanza                                          mbodanza at pstc.state.nh.us
Lt. Paul Moller                                              pmoller at pstc.state.nh.us
Lt. Gerry Taylor                                            gtaylor at pstc.state.nh.us
Lt. Jill Moran                                                jmoran at pstc.state.nh.us


Full-time Officer Training Registrar                 eparent at pstc.state.nh.us
Part-time Officer Training Registrar                lames at pstc.state.nh.us
In-service Officer Training Registrar               dbouvier at pstc.state.nh.us

MERRY CHRISTMAS! to those of you here deserving such, to the others, may you have received or to receive those lumps of coal in your stockings.

Here is (a copy and paste tried) of Reply #9320 (my Reply #2452) on page 626 over at:

http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.9375

Notice the last section of the [ * ] or Electronic Star is what I'd like for you to focus on today, tomorrow and into next week and next year.  Would you please tell me what House +/or Senate Bills you intend to attend, as I'd like to put this Amendment into there UNTIL you do your job!  A test of your job responsibility to see to it that Article 12 "inhabitant" Ed Brown is not further "control"led by the Feds to be conducted AT your location of training and in the field to where they go to the local Concord Police Station, Sheriff's new Office in Boscawen, and at both State Police Headquarters AND that sub-station for Troop __ out by I-89 at the intersection of Iron Works Road and Clinton Street in Concord, N.H. to be conducted next week.  For reference purposes see the paperwork already dropped off this past Wed., Dec. 23rd at the Concord P.D.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603L: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091226/FRONTPAGE/912260342&template=single

entitled: "Time to give Hildreth THE boot!"

of: "jim, re your: "Who was the person that made the decision to just ignore all of these things? Looks like the investigators did their part and then the ball got dropped."

The problem with state AND county government is when the higher-ups give the investigators these decision-making powers, on a delegation-down order that they deal with it so that the "head" of agency can go golfing.  Of the "Do Not Disturb" sign on the door knob to his office. He's not there anyway, but out on the golf course.

I ran into this policy also at the County Attorney's Office when St. Hillaire was there.  His investigator would find RSA Ch. 643:1Official Corruption at the local level, but that because they "take care of their own" there was no actual decision by the "head" since the arm refused to mark with pencil or pen either of ANY decision BELIEVE IT OR NOT! of a continual delay of to Never-Never Land of the pen or pencil never making it to the paper.

Case in point of another case with the County Attorney too for what "DANIEL BARRICK", of the "Monitor Staff" wrote about of: "Citing violations of state and FEDERAL law, a department lawyer wrote that the company, Financial Resources Mortgage, and its president, Scott Farah, 'have illustrated a willingness to forgo the laws and rules of the State of New Hampshire whenever they see fit.'"

WHY did he conclude to forego as in to pre-cede*, as in to come before in time, place, or rank, as it relates to the U.S. Codes or Statutes At Large?  Because the State has yet to "cede"* state lands to the Feds by N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 down from Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution because our conditional "Consent" or offer of property tax exemption to them by 123:2 was for their land, but not their buildings.  They have yet to file their 40USC255 to Title 40 U.S. Code Section 3112 federal papers with Bill Gardner's New Hampshire Office of Secretary of State to accept our offer.  So WHY should these company C.E.O.'s give up their Article 12 inhabitant rights when the Feds have YET to fulfill their part of the contract!?

And SouthEnd Kid, "Sounds like the governor needs to make some changes." but that Hildreth was just re-appointed last year I think it was and so him in there until Year 201_.  BEFORE the re-appointment I met with the governor in the State House with former State Rep. Dick Marple of Hooksett, and when I said to the governor that he ought to appoint Dick to the job of Banking Commissioner, the governor replied back that: "he's got it".  Whatever that meant, as what!? He's got "it" = after Hildreth is fired? as given one more chance, like Hildreth's subordinates give to these company exec's?

WHEN is the next meeting of all Commission heads over at the Chief Office of the governor as the captain of this ship of state?  He ought to do like what Benson did and not give Hildreth a chair to sit in, and go one step further by a symbolic pair of boots, as in to eventually give him THE boot if he doesn't quit! "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/112177/98056

entitled: "Let the Revolution begin! "

of: "So right you are Damkeeper, of not to "rebel" (as in "To resist (or with STAND)or defy ANY authority" - - emphasis ADDed) but to "revolt" (as in "roll back" or re-volve, as in "To ORBIT a central point". - - emphasis ADDed) This is what Joshua did to the Walls of Jericho.  He did orbit them seven times and then blew the trumpet. We are to be like the atomic electrons to the nucleus. http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~acarpi/NSC/3-atoms.htm See the definition below:

"Atoms are made up of 3 types of particles electrons , protons  and neutrons .  These particles have different properties.  Electrons are tiny, very light particles that have a negative electrical charge (-). Protons are much larger and heavier than electrons and have the opposite charge, protons have a positive charge.  Neutrons are large and heavy like protons, however neutrons have no electrical charge.  Each atom is made up of a combination of these particles."

Thus OUR public servants are "charged" by US to do their job, and when they don't do it, what do we do?  Keep them in there anyway, supplying them with a piece of our pay every other Friday!?  Heck no! That should NOT be the case!  They ought to be fired! HALT the paychecks.  Conduct an audit, and have it certified that either they are in compliance with the law, or not!  And when the latter, give this certificate of non-performance of duty to the State Treasurer to cut them a check anyway!?  Of course not!  To cut them off!

Unfortunately the State Personnel Board in the basement of the State House Annex is only open to those withIN the center of that in that only state officials/officers or employees can complain against each other.  Us in the path or orbit out-side the system have only one door in which to enter to complain by statute, and that is by the door to the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims.  I've tried that, and it doesn't work either.  Check it out: my Oct. 15, 2008 complaint against the governor, not filed until a delay to 2009-013 for his Article 51 failure to enforce the laws by the shall word in RSA 123:1 to send a written invitation to the Feds to comply with the law, having fallen on deaf ears, of which he SHALL be Article 41 be responsible for, but when? In a Article 14 non- "prompt" manner on ______ __, 2010?

But by the Constitution of New Hampshire, and Article 10 in particular, in addition to the legal or statutory we also have the lawful right to either: (1) re-form the old, or (2) establish a new government.  This is to be done when the ends of gov't are perverted as in corrupt in that there is no redress of grievance, for BOTH the procedural and substantive, and when the danger, harm or evil manifests its head in the public realm, supposed to stop there before it penetrates onto private soil.  So have ANY of our local, county or state officials been given this evidence of proof of federal non filing?  YES - What are they doing about it harming others?  Nothing! Has their non-performance of duty harmed anybody yet?  Of course! So to sue that agency head in the Board to let it sit there too, or pound some sense into these agency heads?  Let them have a piece of our mind!  Static electricity from us like lightening bolts from the sky! Like a boss telling the employee to get to work! And what do "they" do? Charge you with dis-orderly conduct! A dis-order to them out-of-order. Contempt of court?  Yes when that court is in contempt of the constitution. Same with the executive branch.  "These people" in contempt of us, and ought to be sent away somewhere for that up to 10 days by Articles 22+23 of the N.H. Constitution, Part the Second. Kidnap them?  No. Paddy wagon them? Yes! It's called a citizen's arrest! No RSA Ch. 627:8 criminal intent when force is used against even police officials to retake life, liberty or property of yourself and/or those who you freely associate with as a guarantee by the First Amendment and case law in my Grafton County case, but watch out for to prevent."

Mod: R.S.A. Ch. 627:8
"TITLE LXII
CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 627
JUSTIFICATION
Section 627:8
    627:8 Use of Force in Property Offenses. – A person is justified in using force upon another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to prevent what is or reasonably appears to be an unlawful taking of his property, or criminal mischief, or to retake his property immediately following its taking; but he may use deadly force under such circumstances only in defense of a person as prescribed in RSA 627:4.

Source. 1971, 518:1, eff. Nov. 1, 1973."

Sorry: only property has this right, not to retrieve a stolen person, or their liberty. Except by Article 10. Beyond the statutory to the lawful.

[JosephSHaas]

The Bottom Line.

In N.H. it's lawful to re-take the prisoner unlawfully taken to begin with!

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091227/OPINION/912270336&template=single

entitled: ""Our Bill" Gardner, SS: more than just a State "election czar". "

of: "Katy, as Brian Williams on The NBC Nightly News and SNL says all the time...Thanks.

Plus "thank you" too to the youtube folks over at  YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. for the 6:20 minute video entitled: "New Hampshire Primary - Sham Chain of Custody" seen 178,038 times so far. It's about the official seal.  http: // www dot youtube dot com/watch?v=PKQEQ7qHvgM

Plus speaking of seals and also the Ed Brown anti-I.R.S. case, see also Bill Gardner's official gold seal on that document of federal non-filing to N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 * that he signed over to me way back on September 10th, 2001 at the beginning of this decade, for the Andy Tempelman anti-I.R.S. case in Milford, N.H. for his "Ram in The Thicket" Restaurant that he and his wife plus son did own and operate, and which evidence was attempted to be placed with an Exhibit # to the trial jury to weigh in as a part of to determine their verdict in Ed's case but was refused by that Maine judge assigned to the case by McAuliffe.  A Maine judge, of this Article III "inferior court" of Congress, who did violate the law of 18USC3232 in holding hearings OUTside the supposed jurisdiction of where the crime, as charged, occurred! And when one the Confirmers of this judge was notified of this, to wit: U.S. Senator Judd Gregg in the Senate, he turned a deaf ear, and those in the House of Hodes and Shea-Porter did likewise turn themselves into the no see ems of the deaf, blind, and no-speak monkeys. There was to be no impeachment on their watch.

The corruption continues to this day thanks to no investigative reporting by THIS newspaper that I find disgusting! The truth of this seal within the appeal of what you call the "really scary supporters" to Boston for the First Circuit.  Reference Appeal point Number 12.

So what happens to be the closed eyes decade of the '00 will turn into the open eyes decade of the 2010s. See RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims Case #2009-013 of October 15, 2008 filing to be decided on ______ __, 2010. And "they" call that Article 14 "prompt"!? http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html
________________________________________________

* footnote:   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm    And  See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/40/usc_sec_40_00003112----000-.html see also: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.h... and http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03... ** plus the original http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 for 40USC255.

** "'In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial.' Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)." "

[JosephSHaas]

Kat: WHAT are you doing to us!?  This new system here is lousy!

1.) It leaves a blank space whenever a youtube URL is typed into a Reply; and

2.) You've taken us into the SAME format that The CONCORD MONITOR uses! of leaving OFF the last part of the URL.*

* Lucky for us, that the Archives didn't change, as retrospective  , because I did find the COMPLETE URL with the endings of either htm or html etc. at page 6 here, and so transferred this over to finish my reply with this correction to today's Reply of mine to that Katy Burns story about this "Whew! What a decade!" with mention of both Ed & Elaine.

Here's my latest to over there:

entitled: "Government Cover-Up!"

of: "If you did try to access the United States Attorney Manual #664 at the link in my footnote, you got to that error page, not because of a typo, as I did copy and paste that from a link that did work (past tense) and that it has now dis-appeared, but that thanks to Peabody & Sherman over at the Wayback Machine*, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm for the complete URL of 664 dot htm it is there at: http://web.archive.org/web/20070807213619/http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm

* The main page is: http://www.archive.org/index.php

Plus "they" also "did-away" with Bob Schulz' web page too that cites that Adams case of 1943 at the United States Supreme Court.  [That I did quote therefrom in footnote ** below.] Talk about getting rid of case-law that supports the opposition! The complete URL in that case ends with  9-16-03.htm and so over to http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm click on the blue highlighted Dec. 04, 2007 gets you to: http://web.archive.org/web/20071204173456/http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm "

- - Joe