Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 34

[Mike Barskey]

Thank you for the info on where Ed & Elaine are located. I called the Danbury FCI to confirm that Elaine was there and they said that she was "on writ in Carswell, Texas." I don't know what "on writ" means (or maybe I heard him wrong), and he did not know for how long she would be there. He gave me the address and phone number for the FMC Carswell:
(817) 782-4000
FMC Carswell
PO Box 27066
J Street, Building 3000
Fort Worth, TX  76127

I called them but after ringing for 2-3 minutes with no answer, I gave up (and will try again later).

I have not yet confirmed that Ed is still at FMC Devens.

Thanks again for the info. In the future, I would really appreciate it if anyone who learns of Ed or Elaine being moved would email admin@mail-to-jail.com so we can update the address to which we send them letters.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste of my e-mail letter to Bill Gardner, our N.H. Secretary of State that was sent to him by me at exactly: 11:27 AM E.T. and notice the names in the cc: section:

"Haas - N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1* (+ Texas)?
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Wed 10/21/09 11:27 AM
To:    Secretary of State - N.H. (elections at sos.state.nh.us)
Cc:    Citizens Service - N.H. (Lynch) (officeofcitizenservi at nh.gov); Concord Police Dept. (police at onconcord.com); County Strafford (jmiccolo at co.strafford.nh.us); Donald C. Vittum (dvittum at pstc.state.nh.us); Foster's Daily Democrat (letters at fosters.com); G&C Exec. Sec. Joanne Ruell (gcweb at nh.gov); G&C#1 (rburton at nh.gov); G&C#2 (jshea at nh.gov); G&C#3 (bhollingworth at nh.gov); G&C#4 (rwieczorek at nh.gov); G&C#5 (debora.pignatelli at nh.gov); Jeb Bradley (jebebrad at metrocast.net); Rep. David Russell (russells at metrocast.net); Representative Paul Hodes (nh02ima at mail.house.gov); Senator Patrick Leahy (senator_leahy at leahy.senate.gov)
Bcc:    Andrew Tempelman ...who started this on Sept. 10, 2001... Bernie Bastian ...who notified the Town of Plainfield, N.H. on June 20, 2007 of their duty to protect Ed & Elaine as Article 12 "inhabitants" whose property taxes were paid for this service...Bill Tinker, my friend with Linda who did visit Ed & Elaine with me that Summer of 2007 before their unlawful taking on 10-4 over and out... Bill Riley ...for to help his brother Danny, another victim in this case; Bob Schulz ...with thanks for that 40USC255 info and the 1943 Adams case at the U.S. Supreme Court; ...Kat Kanning, for providing this website to "Chronicle" all of this; ...C7; my friend Danny Mac in MAss. (who might like to visit Fort Devens for a Progress Report of my request for a copy of the log entries); David (Elaine's son); Dennis ...; Dick Marple (armlaw at hotmail.com), my good friend since the 1980s, former N.H. State Trooper, and N.H. State Rep. Retired; Donna (Reno's best friend); Fred Davideit, our former Jail4Judge President; gary b.(re: the World Court); Harriet C.(former State Rep. too) ; Harvey W. friend of: Henry McElroy, former N.H. State Rep.; JAIL4Judges Attn: Barbie; Joe O. (friend of Danny Mac); Jose Gonzalez; keith c. (in contact with Jason Gerhard, another victim); Attorney Lowell "Larry" Becraft of Huntsvill, Alabama, and his website of: http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm a friend of http://www.tuppersaussy.com R.I.P. when I was a subscriber of his "The Main Street Journal" back in the 1980s; Lois G., our former JAIL4JUDGES President here in N.H.; lyndse r.f.; Mary B.; melody w.; Michael L.; Stephen J. D.; sue b.; and Wayne B.

To: William M. Gardner, Secretary of State
Concord, New Hampshire

Bill, Here's a copy and paste of my Reply #9227 (actual reply #2344) on page 616 over at

http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.9225

that was posted at exactly 9:09 a.m. (Central Time/ 11:09 Eastern Time) this morning:

WHEN U.S. Senator John Cornyn from Texas sends that federal "officer"* to finally file these papers, would you please record the event with a camera for which I will repay you for the film by buying you a complete roll for future events, and please have for me to pick up: a copy of the DAY (and time) STAMP on the cover of this filing, presumably to stamp on the upper right corner of a cover-letter as signed by the "officer".

Thank you "very" much! - - - - - - - - - Joe  / Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel.l 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

bcc: Jose Gonzalez and others."

[JosephSHaas]

...
(817) 782-4000
FMC Carswell
PO Box 27066
J Street, Building 3000
Fort Worth, TX  76127 ....

Thanks; to write to her there maybe later today, Elaine-Alice: Brown #03924-049.

I also pressed zero and let it ring for three (3) minutes too from 12:00 o'clock high noon to 12:03 o'clock p.m. E.T. exactly withOUT an answer either.

If and when I do make contact, to see what their policy is in getting earphones to watch AND listen to T.V., +/or a radio, etc., as I think nothing is transferred(?), other than maybe converted to $dollars, but at a discount, so to add $x more to buy all NEW equipment from Commissary where THEY make the profits?

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091021/NEWS01/910210360

entitled: ""Follow the Money"."

of: "Reference paragraph #9 of 13: "$80 million to * schools to fund an "adequate education," .

* how many? #____ and where? which ones? ____________

Is the federal "bunch" and "chunks" of money being spent in a "frugal" manner? as required by Article 38 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights!

As in: WHO audits this? as to certify that the Section 20 of 1795 Act "money" was actually received, AND allocated in accordance with the needs, but not wants of everyone, per the case-law in 55NH503 @ 505 (1875) in the Brentwood School District case out of Rockingham County; re: The Rose & Milton Friedman Plan adaptation of this N.H. case-law.

Do the recipients who receive this money sign on the dotted line that they will spend it in a lawful manner?  And who are they bonded with? What's the Insurance Company? with policy #____________ in that City/ Town for which they pay $xx,xxx per year for errors and omissions.

Let's hope that the educators who educate the next generation do not dumb-down or keep us who paid this money into the "system" in the dark.  A full accounting is claimed by Article 8 of our Bill of Rights.

Yours truly, Joe Haas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTu9HaHDI0A&feature=related "

[LordBaltimore]

Thank you for the info on where Ed & Elaine are located. I called the Danbury FCI to confirm that Elaine was there and they said that she was "on writ in Carswell, Texas."

Perhaps he said that she was "en route" to Carswell.

[Mike Barskey]

Thank you for the info on where Ed & Elaine are located. I called the Danbury FCI to confirm that Elaine was there and they said that she was "on writ in Carswell, Texas."

Perhaps he said that she was "en route" to Carswell.

Yeah, that makes much more sense.

[JosephSHaas]

Here's the automatic reply you get from if and when you write this U.S. Senator in Texas:

"Your Message To Senator Cornyn?
From:    donotreply at cornyn.senate.gov
   Medium riskYou may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent:    Wed 10/21/09 10:47 AM
To:    JosephSHaas at hotmail.com

Dear Joseph Haas,

Thank you for contacting my offices. Your correspondence has been received, and we will respond to you as quickly as possible. A copy of your message is attached below for your records.

If you need immediate assistance regarding an urgent problem you are experiencing with the federal government, visit the "Help With Federal Agencies" section of the website for details on how to proceed so that your difficulties are brought to my attention as soon as possible.

If you are seeking information or services from my offices that are NOT related to my Legislative duties, please visit my "Services For Texans" section for more information.

Warmest Regards,
U.S. Senator John Cornyn

---------------------------------------------------
Name/Email: ...."

[Mike Barskey]

I have confirmed with one person at the FMC Devens prison that Ed Brown is currently there.

[JosephSHaas]

I have confirmed with one person at the FMC Devens prison that Ed Brown is currently there.

Mike: What is Lt. Spina you talked with?

Re: "Lt. Spina (the gatekeeper)
Fort Devens
47 Quebec Street
  Building 681, Box 48
Fort Devens, MAss. 01434
Tel. 978: 796-3512"

He's supposed to be looking into the legalities or NOT of whether Ed is there un-lawfully too, re: no 40USC255 acceptance papers to the N.H. Secretary of State that would give the N.H. U.S. Marshals the lawful authority in which to deposit Ed there either directly or in-directly through the MAss. U.S. Marshals.

If you could call him to ask for a Progress Report of my 10/9 paper to him mailed on Tuesday, October 13th, right after Columbus Day, that he's had since maybe last Thursday 10/15 and so to have had the opportunity to work on this maybe Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, like my call to him yesterday (Tuesday) to please verify that there has been no 40USC255 filing to N.H. RSA 123:1 per 1-8-17 U.S. Const. and to deal with what to do next.

That would be GREAT! to end this nightmare! and ricochet back to help Elaine too of course, and the co-victims of: Danny, Reno, Jason and Bob.

Yours truly, -- Joe

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a copy and paste:

"RE: (N.H.) Oath Keepers Conference - Sheriff Mack Speaking?
From:    Joseph S. Haas (josephshaas at hotmail.com)
Sent:    Wed 10/21/09 4:26 PM
To:    lifeforce43 at rockymountains.net

Thank you, plus for here in New Hampshire, to add to #5 of that of the individual too, as no Article 12- N.H. "inhabitant" shall be controllable by any other laws*, than those to whom he or she or their "legislative body" meaning the N.H. General Court or Legislature "Art. I. Sec. 8, Clause 17 U.S. Constitution "Consent" to, and that includes: * the U.S. Codes or Statutes at Large that are "peanut" statutes here, since our June 14, 1883 "offer " of consent, or a "conditional" consent to the Feds was never 40USC255 accepted by them, and so as spelled out in the case-law of the Adams case of 1943 in the U.S. Supreme Court they have NO jurisdiction OVER us! -- Yours truly, Joe Haas, "Sovereign Citizen".

From: lifeforce43 at rockymountains.net
To: lifeforce43 at rockymountains.net
Subject: Fw: Oath Keepers Conference - Sheriff Mack Speaking
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:53:08 -0600

LET'S HOPE THIS SEES A LOT OF MAILBOXES.....

Thanks to: awarenessgroup
Subject: Oath Keepers Conference - Sheriff Mack Speaking

  This Saturday & Sunday - Very Important - Spread the Word
Bugle Call to Oath Keepers Conference - October 24th & 25th in Las Vegas
Stewart Rhodes, Constitutional Attorney, Yale scholar, formerly on staff with Ron Paul's DC office, U.S. Army paratrooper, firearms instructor.  He has worked as an artist & a firearms instructor.  Stewart was invited to speak at Stanford University on unlawful enemy combatant status, and teaches classes on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  He has been on numerous radio shows.  Oath Keepers fills a need to bring Americans together with law enforcement & military.  Oath Keepers a most important organization with a plan to save our freedom!
http://oathkeepers.org

See Videos - "Declaration of Orders We Will Not Obey"
Sheriff Richard Mack - Forced Vaccine Prevention.  "The sheriff's power supercedes federal regulatory programs,
as Sheriffs are NOT agents of the federal government.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2009/09/28/richard-mack-forced-vaccine-prevention/

We The People Must Help Sheriff Mack and Oath Keepers to educate our sheriffs, police and military concerning their
oaths/responsibilities to the Constitution & the people.  Know the Mission!
Sheriff Mack's Book...and Mission:  "The County Sheriff: America's Last Hope"
http://www.beyondtheordinary.net/sheriffmack.shtml

$50 to preregister - $150 includes meals

OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY
Read full length version. http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2009/03/03/declaration-of-orders-we-will-not-
1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.
2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people
3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as "unlawful enemy combatants" or to subject them to military tribunal.
4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a "state of emergency" on a state.
5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.
6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.
7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.
8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to "keep the peace" or to "maintain control."
9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.
10.We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.
Stop tracking by Google/Big Brother
Protect Your Privacy!  Google is building massive data banks on you...bigger than the gov or the IRS according to Dr. Katherine Albrecht, author of "Spy Chips'.  She urges that we use Start Page by ixquick.  www.startpage.com  Make Startpage your homepage."

[keith in RI]

2.      ELAINE BROWN     03924-049      68-White-F      10-26-2042      CARSWELL FMC

[KBCraig]

Elaine is at Carswell, but she's not there on writ. ("On writ" is jargon for being transferred for a court hearing.) Elaine's status is that she's designated to Carswell. Carswell is the Federal Medical Center for women prisoners. She may have been sent there for medical treatment, or she may have been sent there as "inmate cadre", to work using her dental skills.

Or, because all the medical centers are "ADMIN" security level, she might just be there because they don't have another place to designate her that matches her security level based on her charges and length of sentence.

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091022/NEWS01/910220319

entitled: "Ask each of them this question, and have answer put in writing."

of: "More suck-ups to the Feds, or not?

Candidate #__: yeah, I like feeding at the federal trough.

Candidate #__: no, I think we ought to activate Art. 95 of the N.H. Constitution.*

* http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html = State collectors of the Federal taxes NOT "by" the Feds, BUT "for" the Feds, to keep "Uncle Sam" on a diet of NOT what he always "wants" BUT only "needs", like our own Article 38-N.H. "frugal"ity clause, http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html

We shall "forever" have the Article 7 N.H. power to EITHER tax OR exempt the Feds.  On June 14, 1883 we exempted them from property taxes of their land, but NOT their buildings, http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-2.htm from http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm

So at about $20.00 per $1,000 of valuation for their complex over there of both the James C. Cleveland and Warren B. Rudman buildings at 53-55 Pleasant Street, Concord, N.H. assessed at $111 million, that calculates to over $2.2 million to the City of Concord and County of Merrimack every year!

Now which candidate(s) will truly honor their RSA Ch. 42:1 and 92:2 oath(s) of office? http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/III/42/42-1.htm and http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm to Article 84, N.H. Constitution.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTu9HaHDI0A&feature=related "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.info/comment/reply/103174/85704

from: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091022/NEWS01/910220379

entitled: "Time to: "Think outside the box." "

of: "Thank you "NH".  Plus how many of these people are registered lobbyists?  #____ I KNOW that the Shapiro attorney outfit (on North Main Street in Concord, across from the HESS gasoline station/ convenience store), is one of them, as I've seen their name listed there in the book on the table in the Office of Secretary of State, 2nd floor, State House.  Too bad they stop there and don't inquire of WHERE the other filing is: re: the RSA Ch. 123:1 federal filing that is nowhere to be found, and "they" and others give their 2-cents of this and that when we should be talking $millions of dollars of not only this WHAT of to tax and spend but HOW the federal money is collected in the first place.  Time for our cut as the State collectors NOT "by" BUT "for" the Feds, to keep "Uncle Sam" in tip-top-shape of what he "needs", and sometimes to give him what he "wants". In other words: the parent or creator to give the allowance to the child or creature. See my other Reply today in TRYing to pin down what the Concord City Council candidates [CCCC, or C-4] can put in writing of yes or no to activate our Art. 95-N.H. powers for this, and see also Article 7 N.H. - Part First.

And quoting: ""The long-term strategy of the Democratic leadership in New Hampshire is to change our state political culture and significantly increase the size and scope of government," said State Rep. Jennifer Coffey, (R- Merrimack 6)." To which I say: so what? IF that change is to DECREASE the Federal involvement here, and INCREASE the N.H. size of a few more collectors of taxes in the State Dept. of Revenue to: up periscope, and bombs away, or tax bills sent from there to us, instead of from and directly to the Feds! At least then there would be an executive check-and-balance closer to home rule in being able to talk to a "David" (of indirectly to the Feds) rather than a "Goliath" from the Feds.

To see what is written up in the Official Minutes of the State of what Gary and Alex said for The "Stonyfield Farm" and "Common Man" respectfully, to compare to any Report at their websites for more accurate and full information. http://www.stonyfield.com/ and http://www.thecman.com/ respectfully.

The "Stop the Spending" for next week, re: "The House Republican Office will host a "Stop the Spending" session on Tuesday, October 27 from 9:30 to noon at the Grappone Conference Center in Concord." is a good start of the present mentality, but that I think they ought to: "Think Outside the Box" of beyond the borders of the State to HOW the Feds get their money from us!"

[JosephSHaas]

Re:  http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091024/NEWS01/910240352

entitled: "Feds did AND does NOT comply with state law!"

of: "What a bunch of hypocrites! WHEN are the Feds going to comply with our state REQUIREMENT?, by the "shall" word as a must condition in RSA Ch. 123:1

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm

from: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm

in regards to Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution; see also:

http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC27Xem-EU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTu9HaHDI0A&feature=related "