Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS, Part 35

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a re-type:

"THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Strafford County Superior Court
259 County Farm Road / P.O. Box 799
Dover, N.H. 03821-0799
603: 742-3065
http://www.courts.state.nh.us

Joseph S. Haas v. Board of Strafford County Commissioners
Case Number: 219-2009-CV-00614

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

--NOW COMES the Plaintiff Haas, within ten (10) days of the 2-page ORDER of last Tuesday, January 26th that looks to be a fill-in the blank done by some law clerk that the judge merely signed withOUT even reading it! because during the last hearing on this matter I did correct the judge once already that I did NOT 'request its transfer to superior court' as contrary to line #2 of 15 on page 1, because this was done by the Assistant County Attorney by the request and payment of the $115 transfer fee for a trial by jury.

--As already also indicated in the prior paperwork and at said hearing this case is NOT pursuant to N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 651:63, but Articles 5 +12 of the New Hampshire Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights!  RSA Ch. 651:63 is merely a helpful tool for the jury to calculate the damages at the sevenfold amount per Proverbs 6:30-31 and Public Law 97-280 of 1982.

--According to the Hackett case of 1948 in 95 NH 45 @ 47 (cited within the Morency case @ page 346) the 'plaintiff...is entitled to (his) day in court' for which the merits are of both 'substantive AND procedural due process of law.  See Chart #1 of 2 attached hereto for: (1) the latter on procedure having been a 2-step process that FAILed to prevent the waste of my time and expense, and which A + B was not combined (by looking at BOTH the approved visitor list and the * for the suspension in the footnote) until later at the jail; and (2) the former 'substance' being that: [page 1/page 2] 'No...inhabitants of this state (shall be) controllable by any other laws....'  The Commissioners and their charges have stolen my right to associate* as counsel** to my friend as are rights supposed to be a guarantee by the U.S. Constitution: the 1st + 6th Amendments respectfully.  They let Federal policy over-ride R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 and even their own code! 40 USC 255 to Title 40 U.S. Code Section 3112.  So BOTH the WAY they stole my rights and WHY are wrongs for which my 'redress' by the Morency case of 1950 in Vol. 96 N.H. REPORTS 344 @ page 346 was and still is for this association* and counsel** with my friend Ed Brown, or if not, as by the Motion to Attach having been denied, and now maybe moot since his transfer then for The Board of Strafford County Commissioners in Dover City to pay me $ damages!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302; 603: 848-6059, JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com,  with my right to 'worship God according to the dictates of' my 'own reason' being to abide by Matthew 25:43-45 of to 'visit' with 'the least of these' people 'in prison'ed because 'in as much' I "do it' to Him, as is supposed to be a guarantee by Article 5, New Hampshire Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights not to be 'restrained' in such as I was in my 'liberty' even though I 'doth not disturb the public peace.'

Typed: Tue., Feb. 2, 2010
mailed Wed.,Feb. 3, 2010
delivered :   Feb. 4, 2010 (10th day)

pc: Stephen G. LaBonte, Esq.uire, Assistant Strafford County Attorney, P. O. Box 799, Dover, N.H. 03821

** It was supposed to be AT LEAST a 3-party defense:

The counsel (Haas) to the inmate (Brown) and for the representative (Iacopino) in court.

v.s.

The U.S. Attorney and his prosecutor and deputy, plus 4 (?) assistants on this case.

WHERE be The "scales of justice" for a ratio of 2 to 7 !? "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100203/NEWS01/2030354

and:  http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100203/NEWS01/2030354#comment-107258

entitled: ""Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice". "

of: "Who is the RJM?  I've never heard of him until just now.

I tried finding his telephone # but that it's not at GOOGLE nor in the phone book for The Lakes Region edition  that covers Holderness I see of (relatives by same last name? there), and so LFP/ Laconia Franklin + Plymouth a separate book? 536-_____

At http://www.google.com/ I did find for the words: "Ryan J. Murdough" Plymouth at page #1 there  http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=%22Ryan+J.+Murdough%22+Plymouth+&aq=f&aqi=&oq=%22Ryan+J.+Murdough%22+Plymouth+&fp=a7d7ab29d0c8bbb9   this website of: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=451603&page=297 with a post by him on 3-8-2009: of "For small communities and minor crimes, the local representative will function as justice of the peace.'

Hey! Where did this kid grow up?  Didn't he learn in school of the three SEPARATE  branches of government being the executive, legislative and judicial?  These State Reps are in the Legislative Branch NOT judicial! Or does he want to get back to like comparable to the English "constable" word? for a C.O.P. of an executive with minor judicial duties.

What's the word for another over-lap-ing of attorneys as members of the Bar in the judicial system who like to stick their noses into the legislative? _______ by becoming State Reps.  Not only their noses but their entire bodies! The people who voted them into office KNOWing such are called what? _______

And to the RHM of Henniker: How be the effectiveness of your RSA Ch. 42:1 and 92:2 oath of office?  How many executive checks have you done lately, IF any!? Reference I-89 through your town involving federalies no doubt on parasite patrol to find their next victim to leech onto the host of us Article 12 inhabitants who REFUSE to be controllable by any OTHER laws such as the U.S. Code or Statutes at Large.  I bet you're a hypocrite for taking federal funds while laughing at the people who pay you the taxes for such protection!  "To serve and protect " WHO?, in what extortion racket?  Disgusting, just thoroughly disgusting.  Reference the Ed Brown individual and others who  made it through your town slick as can be with no check.  Wise up!

So for the pot to call the kettle black in this department too!? "

[error]

Wave hello to the feds!

[keith in RI]

Wave hello to the feds!

?????

[error]

Oh, you didn't think they ever went away?

[Jim Johnson]

Flip Six Schnergenburger skip two pages.

[JosephSHaas]

Wave hello to the feds!

Up and down, or back and forth?

To block their blows?

"Amnesty Awesome Commercial"
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
of 0:51 seconds   7,258 x

[JosephSHaas]

Reference to Monier's check to me that bounced:

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100204/NEWS01/2040353#comment-107808

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100207/FRONTPAGE/2070326&template=single

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100207/FRONTPAGE/2070326#comment-108237

entitled: "I told you so."

of: "Re: "state banking officials, in their annual exams, found numerous violations by the company, and even moved to take away Farah's banking license at one point. But officials never followed through on that recommendation, instead renewing Farah's license. "

So how much of these investors' money was put into the fund AFTER this recommendation was made but NOT done by Peter C. Hildreth? #______ for $__________. Mr.  "lawyerly wordsmith"er Hildreth, a George Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty Four" Double-Talker. In what is supposed to be a constitutional government operating to regulate the commercial, NOT to take partner withIN it! RE: HB #________ of 200___ by Dick Marple to amend RSA Ch. 390:6 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXXV/390/390-6.htm of "cash" as per Art. 97 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html as annotated to the Jackson case and Chapter 28 Laws of N.H., Vol. 6 @ page 155 of 1794. They can't even pay off one Art. 15 just "compensation" of the $100 per year in lawful money for one State Rep's 1/2 of his 2-year term!  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/house.html = $200/term since 1889.

I think that these investors ought to get their money back from out of that state insurance policy* from Manchester.  And if that $amount is drained, then to fire Hildredth BEFORE his term expires and attach his Art. 36 retirement pay.  Leaving Hildreth with $______ per year to live in some rooming house room, AFTER selling his $__________house to pay off these victims.  Hildreth is entitled to a $100,000 RSA Ch. 480:1 homestead, that's 100% more than what I did NOT get! in this lousy N.H. court system. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-XLIX-480.htm

Yours truly, JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com, founding member with 19 others (including three State Reps) of V.O.C.A.L.S., Inc. [ Victims of a Corrupt American Legal System] started by Berlin, N.H. Mayor Dick Bosa, R.I.P.

P.S. Before Hildreth's last term expired I nominated former State Rep. Dick Marple for the post from Hooksett, and Lynch said to both Dick and I at the State House that day: "he's got it," (what is "it"? the look, but not the job?) and so what happened!? Who paid off who with what, if any as a kickback to get the job!? Dick's seen envelopes pass in the Senate when certain bills are being voted on.  Can you guess what color paper are in those envelopes?

* The FERDINANDO Insurance Associates, Inc., 637 Chestnut Street, Manchester, N.H. 03104, 603: 669-3218 Policy # BVD-1723709 for up to only $100,000 per Dishonest Employee according to Form P, a branch of: The Hanover Insurance Group, 440 Lincoln St., Worcester, MAss. 01653 1-800-343-6044 http://www.Hanover.com See RSA Ch. 93-B:1,II http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/93-B/93-B-1.htm and Section I covered in Form ___? re: "faithfully to perform their duties". Cost per year: $_____________? Compared to the roughly $150,000 per year for $5 million insurance coverage at the counties. See RSA Ch. 507:5 for when the Sheriffs screw up: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LII/507/507-5.htm Me IN SEARCH OF...a good attorney to sue for non-service by Sheriff to my corporate clerk according to RSA Ch. 528:18 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIV/528/528-18.htm Theft of real estate (land and building), meaning the principal plus interest being the rents."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100209/NEWS01/2090321

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100209/NEWS01/2090321#comment-108716

entitled: ""Old friend" with old or new oath? "

of: "Good, re: "Roarick will be officially sworn in at 7 p.m. Thursday at the Hillsboro police station. "

Let's hope that the oath of office is in the format as spelled out in RSA Ch. 42:1 + 92:2 to Article 84 of the N.H. Constitution, because if it's like the one Concord*** uses it's out-of-order.

In Concord they swear to help the Feds even OVER the fact of there being no 40USC255 to 40USC3112 * "Consent" on file with Bill Gardner's Office of Secretary of State as required by RSA Ch. 123:1 to protect us Article 12 "inhabitants" from being CONTROLLED by any OTHER laws than that of which we consent to, that in-cludes ALL U.S. Codes and Federal Statutes At Large!

*** http://www.ci.concord.nh.us/sitemgrv2/concordv2.asp?siteindx=events&mapindx=00000000&mthd_nbr=2a&cat_id=City%20Council&mapindx_id=00000000 The City Council, on next Tue., Feb. 16th from 7 to 11 p.m. to vote that Paul Cavanaugh, the City Solicitor work to correct these illegal and unlawful oaths so as to report back to them BEFORE the time to set the Agenda for their March Meeting, at which time, if NOT so corrected,  I've asked to address them about this oath that has been like this since the mid 1980s BELIEVE IT OR NOT, as the Chief Robert Barry, up through the ranks to Chief too.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
footnotes:

1.) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/III/42/42-1.htm
2.) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm
3.) http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html
4.) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm
to: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm see also: http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm
5.) http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html of: "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent."

* See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/40/usc_sec_40_00003112----000-.html see also: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm and http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm [both htm, not html]  ** plus the original http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 for 40USC255.

** """In view of 40 USC 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USC 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."" "

[armlaw]

** """In view of 40 USC 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USC 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."" "


Joe... Have you sent this information to Attorney General Eric Holder? If not perhaps you could get some attention from the DOJ as to the lack of jurisdiction ?  Your reliance on the supreme court case is a good foundation for action.
[/quote]

[JosephSHaas]

**... no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless ...."

Joe... Have you sent this information to Attorney General Eric Holder? ....

[/quote]

Answer: no, not directly, but an ATTEMPT at an in-direct through his DOJ's here in N.H. by being FORCED to face this WHEN a jury tells them so, BUT in the criminal case here of Singal REFUSing to allow that Art. 49 document relating to such into evidence to be marked as an exhibit now on appeal to Boston. Thus to win that, or file some civil suit for damages at $2,500 per day for wrongful prosecution. Danny is working on this to file such withIN the 3 year statute of limitations by RSA Ch. 508:4 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LII/508/508-4.htm of three years from the June 7, 2007 incident. Unfortunately for him, the Feds in Indiana have clamped down on him: his telephone AND e-mail privileges have been taken away for NO known reason (other than some bogus excuse of insolence) for 90 days, in what is supposed to be a "Correctional" Facility, the Feds NOT wanting to learn the truth, and so THEM really the arrogant ones! That's all of Feb., March and April, leaving only the month of May to organize and file this.

- - Joe

[JosephSHaas]

From: State of New Hampshire, HOUSE RECORD
Second Year of the 161st General Court
Calendar and Journal of the 2010 Session
Vol. 32, Concord, N.H.  Friday, February 5, 2010   No. 13
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/caljourns/calendars/2010/houcal2010_13.html

for today: "CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY, Room 204, LOB

9:00 a.m.          Subcommittee work session on HB 1134, authorizing federal law enforcement officers to use deadly and non-deadly force when assisting state law enforcement officials.

10:00 a.m.     ...executive session on HB 1134, authorizing federal law enforcement officers to use deadly and non-deadly force when assisting state law enforcement officials".

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H26

To get a copy of the notes for this plus any and all written testimony from the Committee Clerk or receptionist from the folder tomorrow. ______ [Judith Johnson @ 271-3565 "might" be there she just told me, but if not, then to buy same for about 10-cents a page from her, by pick-up at the front desk on the first floor from Jamie.]

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/HB1134.html

Notice that of to "Amend RSA 627:5 by inserting after paragraph VIII the following new paragraph:

IX. A federal law enforcement officer or special agent who has been requested or directed by a New Hampshire law enforcement officer to assist in effecting an arrest,...is justified in using: (a) Non-deadly force ...unless the federal officer or special agent believes the arrest is illegal; or (b) Deadly force only when he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to defend himself,...or when the New Hampshire law enforcement officer directs the federal officer or special agent to use deadly force and the federal officer or special agent believes the New Hampshire law enforcement officer is authorized ...."

Question: Does this work in reverse too? ___  Like when the Federal agent requests of the local, county or state law-enforcement officer to assist them, can our official, who has sworn an oath to protect us, disregard that protection!? Re: RSA Ch. 42:1 and 92:2 to Art. 84 and Article 12 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/III/42/42-1.htm and http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm to http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html and http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html for Article 12: "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent."  An offer of conditional consent as by RSA Ch. 123:1 is NOT Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17 "Consent" unless and until acceptance, re: the Adams case of the U.S. Supreme Court in 1943 and even the U.S. Attorney's own Manual #664, there being no GSA "head" of "agency" filing per 40USC255 to 40USC3112 as the landlord of those tenants over there at 53-55 Pleasant Street, Concord, N.H. to have their U.S. Codes and Statutes at Large THEN be controllable over us *** when we don't individually consent. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm and

* See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/40/usc_sec_40_00003112----000-.html see also: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm and http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03.htm [both htm, not html]  ** plus the original http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 for 40USC255.

** """In view of 40 USC 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USC 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)."" "

To see WHERE this House Bill 1134 is in the process, check out both:

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/bill_status.aspx?lsr=2058&sy=2010&sortoption=&txtsessionyear=2010&txtbillnumber=HB1134 = due out of Committee next Thu., Feb. 18th to go the the Floor of the House for a vote on Wed., Feb. 24th; +

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/bill_docket.aspx?lsr=2058&sy=2010&sortoption=&txtsessionyear=2010&txtbillnumber=HB1134

So when Ed & Elaine were taken FROM Plainfield (the Town taking their money for property tax protection but never doing what the job describes of to protect) TO the Lebanon P.D. they too were supposed to be a check-and-balance in the system, and as I did alert them by my appearance at the Lebanon City Council on June 6, 2007 the day before the raid on Elaine's dental office, and with Bernie to the Town of Plainfield Selectmen with COP there on June 20, 2007 to say for to either protect OR give them their money back! A lawsuit for a Writ of Formedom to Sullivan County against the Town for these property tax payments as having been stolen too to get them back as caretakers there onto their Plainfield property AND a lawsuit for the theft of land and building in Lebanon PLUS tax money too against the City of Lebanon to the Grafton County Superior Court in North Haverhill, to file BEFORE June 7th, 2010 also, withIN the 3-yr. RSA Ch. 508:4 statute of limitations. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LII/508/508-4.htm

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

P.S. Notice WHO the Sponsor of this legislation is: Stephen Shurtleff, the Chairman of this Committee who was a Deputy U.S. Marshal and who tried to be the next U.S. Marshal after Monier, but who lost out to N.H. State Trooper David Cargill. His daughter works for the Merrimack County Superior Court Clerk and his wife works as Clerk over there at the Concord District Court to where I took Monier on that criminal charge of issuance of a bounced check, in violation of the law: Section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792   http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/coinage1792.txt  as a supposed constitutional not commerce office for the Coinage Act of 1965, but that she REFUSED to process on that Order from Ed Kelly (my former tenant's attorney) of Plymouth, the head of ALL the District Courts in N.H. using the sole dissenting opinion in the Rita Premo case (from Berlin) against me, http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2002/0209/marti098.htm and so the/ the Legislature now tackling how  "they" those who are the perpetrators get away with not having these RSA Ch. 643:1 Official Oppression charges NOT processed either! http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm and http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/640/640-2.htm over to: HB1515 text: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2010/HB1515.html see: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/bill_status.aspx?lsr=2107&sy=2010&sortoption=&txtsessionyear=2010&txttitle=official%20oppression due out of this Committee on the same day of next Thu., 2/18 also: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/bill_docket.aspx?lsr=2107&sy=2010&sortoption=&txtsessionyear=2010&txttitle=official%20oppression having had their Executive Session on this this past Tue., Feb. 9th, to likewise find out what happened there, as I attended and spoke on this back on: Thu., Jan. 14th.

Mod: *** as long as they are constitutional.

[DonnaVanMeter]

Want to Help Cirino Gonzalez?
IT's EASIER THAN EVER!

1. COPY THIS LETTER:


Re: Grievance; El Reno FCI, Case # 565879-F1


Please, address the accusations that Cirino Gonzalez has made against U.S. Marshal Berry, Jamie including the evidence that has been posted all over the Internet, i.e.:

Falsified Proffers of Wolffe and Riley by Jamie Berry

Sworn Affidavit by Patricia L. Webber accusing U.S. Marshal Dennis Suszko:

Patricia's Affidavit of Truth

Furthermore, Bureau of Prison employees justify preventing Cirino Gonzalez from obtaining evidence to demonstrate his innocence by calling said evidence
"Property."
Are we to believe that the U.S.A. is practicing such reticent acts as was once the policy of Pre-WWII
Gestapo?
Reference Cirino Gonzalez at the information provide below:

Cirino Gonzalez 76342-179
FCI EL RENO
P.O. BOX 1500
EL RENO, OK 73036

Thank you from a concerned observer.


2. SEND TO THESE PEOPLE:


Office of the Att Gen U.S. Dept of Justice
Main Justice Building
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20530-0001

Gerardo Maldonado, Jr.
Regional Director, South Central Reg Off
Federal Bureau of Prisons
4211 Cedar Springs Rd
Dallas, TX 75219


Harley G. Lappin
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
320 First St., NW,
Washington, DC 20534


3. OR CALL/EMAIL

For general information,
call
202-307-3198

Phone:
214-224-3389
SCRO/EXECASSISTANT@BOP.GOV

Below are the Two documents to send to the addresses above.
Thank You.

<a title="View Proffer Riley v Wolffe wCG Notes on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/24343392/Proffer-Riley-v-Wolffe-wCG-Notes" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;">Proffer Riley v Wolffe wCG Notes</a> <object id="doc_50429836500541" name="doc_50429836500541" height="600" width="100%" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" style="outline:none;"><param name="movie" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf" ></param>
<param name="wmode" value="opaque" ></param>
<param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" ></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" ></param>
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" ></param>
<param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=24343392&amp;access_key=key-1jtefqqesphhpeh6rbql&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" ></param>
<embed wmode="opaque" id="doc_50429836500541" name="doc_50429836500541" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=24343392&amp;access_key=key-1jtefqqesphhpeh6rbql&amp;page=1&amp;viewMode=list" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="600" width="100%" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object>



<a href="http://s268.photobucket.com/albums/jj18/Sirhandsomee/?action=view&amp;current=PLWAOT1001252.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj18/Sirhandsomee/PLWAOT1001252.jpg" border="0" alt="Webber Affidavit"  /></a>

[armlaw]

 three years from the June 7, 2007 incident. Unfortunately for him, the Feds in Indiana have clamped down on him: his telephone AND e-mail privileges have been taken away for NO known reason (other than some bogus excuse of insolence) for 90 days, in what is supposed to be a "Correctional" Facility, the Feds NOT wanting to learn the truth, and so THEM really the arrogant ones! That's all of Feb., March and April, leaving only the month of May to organize and file this.

- - Joe
[/quote]

Statutes of limitation are mere "Public Policy". Statutes are NOT law. The common law FRAUD has no "Statute of Limitation".

Any action should be brought forth as a Common Law trespass and Common Law Fraud upon the rights of the inhabitant who is a belligerent claimant at Law in an Article III Court, pursuant to the 7th Amendment constitution for the united States of America.