FEMA vid

[AlanM]

We may be closer to WTSHTF than we thought.

[Tunga]

There has been increased talk of the bird flu virus. Thinking the virus is his ace in the hole.

It has been a year and a month since the great leader hath decreed all his subservients bend over and taketh the flu.

bee it bird or otherwise.

fuck the mother fucking President.

Just for good measure.

[Tunga]

Tunga sorry to refer to George Bush as Great LEADER.
Tunga know President only pawn in One World Order plan.

Sorry GWB. Thought for a sec you were on  correct and true side.

Never bother.

Live free or Die eh?

[Pat McCotter]

Suspension of the Constitution was provided for a long time ago with a previous Presidential Order.

http://www.truthvendor.com/fema.html

In fact, FEMA wasn't even formed under Constitutional law but instead was made by Presidential Executive Order - this means that it became law merely by being published as such. In comparison, both the US Military and the CIA must report directly to Congress. A reading of the list of Executive Orders related to FEMA is quite unsettling.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media. Some TruthVendor readers may agree with the editors here that this has probably happened already.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision. In the event of a nuclear attack, it seems that the US Government wishes to return to the slavery its citizens fought to leave behind so long ago.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis. FEMA can do what they want whenever they want (and they alone defined the meaning of "tension" and "crisis").

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

All of those EO's have been revoked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, there are new EO's to replace them but please,PLEASE,PLEASE, quit citing those and find the correct ones!

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/numeric-executive-orders.html

Just the first one:

EO 10995 -
Amended EO 10695A, 10705.
Amended by EO 11084
Revoked by EO 11556

EO 11556 -
Amended EO's 10705, 11051, 11191, 11490.
Amended by EO 11921
Revoked by EO 12046

EO 12046 -
Amended by EO's 12148, 12472
Codified at Chapter 47

Text of EO 12046

[CNHT]

Suspension of the Constitution was provided for a long time ago with a previous Presidential Order.

http://www.truthvendor.com/fema.html

In fact, FEMA wasn't even formed under Constitutional law but instead was made by Presidential Executive Order - this means that it became law merely by being published as such. In comparison, both the US Military and the CIA must report directly to Congress. A reading of the list of Executive Orders related to FEMA is quite unsettling.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media. Some TruthVendor readers may agree with the editors here that this has probably happened already.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision. In the event of a nuclear attack, it seems that the US Government wishes to return to the slavery its citizens fought to leave behind so long ago.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis. FEMA can do what they want whenever they want (and they alone defined the meaning of "tension" and "crisis").

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

All of those EO's have been revoked!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, there are new EO's to replace them but please,PLEASE,PLEASE, quit citing those and find the correct ones!

http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/numeric-executive-orders.html

Just the first one:

EO 10995 -
Amended EO 10695A, 10705.
Amended by EO 11084
Revoked by EO 11556

EO 11556 -
Amended EO's 10705, 11051, 11191, 11490.
Amended by EO 11921
Revoked by EO 12046

EO 12046 -
Amended by EO's 12148, 12472
Codified at Chapter 47

Text of EO 12046

Correct ones? I was just saying when the original ones were made.........

[Pat McCotter]

Correct ones? I was just saying when the original ones were made.........

OK, but you copied from TruthVendor citing them as the current FEMA marching orders and they are not.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 gives authorization...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency...

The verbs should be past tense if these EO's are being cited.

Why not cite the current EO's?

[Pat McCotter]

BTW, is anybody watching ABC Tuesday night? "Fatal Contact: Bird Flu in America"

[CNHT]

Correct ones? I was just saying when the original ones were made.........

OK, but you copied from TruthVendor citing them as the current FEMA marching orders and they are not.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 gives authorization...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency...

The verbs should be past tense if these EO's are being cited.

Why not cite the current EO's?

Because I had not looked them up yet. Those are the 'earliest' ones. I just wanted people to see what they allowed the gov't to do.

[Pat McCotter]

Correct ones? I was just saying when the original ones were made.........

OK, but you copied from TruthVendor citing them as the current FEMA marching orders and they are not.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 gives authorization...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency...

The verbs should be past tense if these EO's are being cited.

Why not cite the current EO's?

Because I had not looked them up yet. Those are the 'earliest' ones. I just wanted people to see what they allowed the gov't to do.

OK. I guess I've found my hot-button topic. Sorry for the lack of a cooling off period before posting.

[CNHT]

Correct ones? I was just saying when the original ones were made.........

OK, but you copied from TruthVendor citing them as the current FEMA marching orders and they are not.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 gives authorization...
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency...

The verbs should be past tense if these EO's are being cited.

Why not cite the current EO's?

Because I had not looked them up yet. Those are the 'earliest' ones. I just wanted people to see what they allowed the gov't to do.

OK. I guess I've found my hot-button topic. Sorry for the lack of a cooling off period before posting.

I appreciate your posting the new stuff.
Yes we know the Constitution has been breached, and the stuff I posted showed how long ago it happened. I should have said, these have been repealed, updated or whatever since, but the basic endproduct is the same ? the gov't still has given itself the power over us that it should not have.

In years past there was much talk of the gov't violation of the 'posse comitatus' law. The more states and people resist with the nwo 'rules' the more likely this is to happen as well.

[Kat Kanning]

OK. I guess I've found my hot-button topic. Sorry for the lack of a cooling off period before posting.

Woohoo!  McPat has a button for us to push 

[Atlas]

All EOs are unconstitutional since the president can't make law. And since there is no emergency powers granted to the pres via the constitution, the game is over.

[John]

It's not news to me: I watched those hearings . . . Not much has changed.
If anyone thinks just one of the BIG parties is bad, recall that G.H.W.(NWO) Bush was running things and that the jerk from Hawaii who stopped the questioning was of the other BIG party.

[John]

 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1275151795786812331&q=alex+jones

[CNHT]

Well, for those of you like FTL_Ian who still refuse to believe that nothing is being planned, read this.
I was looking for the exact quote with which the speaker at the UN conference had ended his list of things he wanted under UN control: "...and indeed, their very happiness" but I have yet to locate that. If not a picture of Orwell's nightmare, what is?


'SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT' THE EVIL FACING AMERICA
Part 1

By Tom DeWeese
August 6, 2004
NewsWithViews.com
On July 23, 2004, Tom DeWeese, president of the American Policy Center, addressed the fifth annual Freedom 21 Conference in Reno, Nevada. The following is the first of two parts of his address on the agenda, the threat, and the defeat of "Sustainable Development."
My friends, we come here today from many walks of life. A wide variety of reasons got each of us started on the road to activism.

Some of us started simply because we noticed something funny about our child's curriculum in school. Some of us were outraged by government trying to take away our guns. A good many of us suddenly found government agents and members of private groups plotting to take away our land. Some have had their livestock confiscated. Some have found themselves facing jail just for doing what their fathers and grandfathers have done on the same land for decades.

Some of us just wanted to be allowed to go to church, pray to God and celebrate Christmas without being fined for it. A few of us would even like to be able to go to a restaurant and order food we like - even if it is greasy, fattening and full of carbs and calories.

All of us just want to live in an America where our rights and pursuit of happiness is protected. And so we fight. And now we've found ourselves here today in a room with hundreds of others in the same boat.

I have one thing to tell you. You are not going to win. Because the other side has cut us up into little pieces. They've divided us and conquered us.

They've succeeded because you think your fight is against gun control. Because you think your fight is against bad schools. Because you think your fight is against the Endangered Species Act and roadless programs, and wetlands regulations, and water rights and Heritage Areas. Because you think your fight is against Democrats and not Republicans. Because you think it's a fight between evil liberals and good guy conservatives.

You're wrong. Your fight is against a well-planned, well orchestrated agenda for the complete transformation of America. And unless you learn that fact now, today... and unless you fully educate yourselves to every aspect of that agenda and fight it on the proper terms? then you cannot win!

I'm here to tell you that every one of these issues you are facing is interrelated. There is an agenda being implemented before your very eyes. It's called Sustainable Development.

And I will tell you now, if you want to keep your guns, your property, your children and your God? if you love liberty? Then Sustainable Development is your enemy!

So what is Sustainable Development? Imagine an America in which a specific "ruling principle" is created to decide proper societal conduct for every citizen.

That principle would be used to consider everything you eat, what you wear, the kind of homes you live in, the method of transportation used to get to work, the way you dispose of waste, perhaps the number of children you may have, even your education and employment decisions.

Sustainable Development is that "ruling principle" for the implementation of what former Vice President Al Gore said we must all suffer through in order to purify our nation from the horrors of the Twentieth Century's industrial revolution.

In his book, "Earth in the Balance," Gore called it a "wrenching transformation of society." Those are pretty powerful words that should concern anyone who values liberty. It's a warning that the rules are changing. That a new power elite is taking control.

Perhaps you are beginning to notice such changes as you go about your daily routine, but haven't understood where those changes, and the ideas behind them, are coming from. But Sustainable Development is a very difficult concept to grasp. It's written in an almost foreign language - designed to mislead and refrain from alarming you.

Let me put it in the simplest language I possibly can. The Atkins Diet is not sustainable. Now, why do I say that? Because on page 350 of the UN's Global Biodiversity Assessment Report it says that the grazing of livestock, including cows, sheep, goats and horses is not sustainable. One reason for that concept is because Sustainablists contend that the animals pollute and damage the banks of streams.

Getting us to stop eating beef is a major effort needed to fully implement the Sustainable Agenda. Since they are cowards who fear your reaction to an outright banning of eating meat, they have to try to trick you into thinking that not eating meat is your idea. So they use scare tactics. For years they have told you that eating meat raises your cholesterol. Fat is bad for you. Meat causes heart attacks. With PeTA's help they were succeeding in turning us all into little sissies eating salads.

Then along comes Dr. Atkins who shows us that a low carb beef diet will help you lose weight in a healthy way. Suddenly the nation has gone Atkins crazy. Beef sales are sky rocketing. The Sustainablists are in a tail spin. They've lost control of your eating habits.

Now watch what they are doing to get you back on track. Suddenly reports are being published in leading women's magazines about Atkins being dangerous to your health. Lawsuits have begun to pop up against the diet.

Do you see how it works? That's how the Sustainable Development agenda is implemented. Behavior modification based on fear. Freedom of choice is not part of Sustainable Development. And so I repeat, - the Atkins Diet is not sustainable.

Now, perhaps you'll understand why there are Sustainable Development papers, guidelines and regulations to impose the ruling principle:

On our public education system - to prepare our children to live in a sustainable world.

On our economy - to create partnerships between business and government, making sure business becomes a tool to help implement the policies.

On the environment - leading to controls on private property and business.

On health care - the new drive against obesity is leading directly toward controls on what we eat.

On farming - Sustainable Development policies affect farmers' ability to produce more crops by regulating or banning precious chemicals, biotechnology and genetic engineering in the name of environmental protection.

On our social and cultural environment - where political correctness is controlling policy hiring practices, immigration policy, multiculturalism, marriage laws, etc.

On our mobility - with emphasis on carpools and public transportation and away from the freedom of personal transportation.

And on public safety - where the rule of law and the court system is being challenged by new regulations that affect the right to privacy and unreasonable search and seizures.

It's important to understand that these leading issues we face today are not just random concerns that find their way into the forefront of political debate. They are all interconnected to the policies of Sustainable Development.

And you must understand that Sustainable Development is the official policy of the government of the United States of America - and every state, city and small burg in the nation.

It is completely bi-partisan. It is being equally implemented by Republicans and Democrats. No matter the outcome of any election - the Sustainable Development agenda moves forward unabated.

What we are telling you here today, my friends, is that Sustainable Development isn't just some land use policy. It is a complete transformation of American society; away from the rule of law; away from the ideals of property ownership, free enterprise, free travel and even free association.

Sustainable Development. It's a life plan. Planned by someone else. Not you.

And Sustainable Development is not a myth, or a theory or a conspiracy - as I've heard some in our own movement call it.

Since the 1970's literally hundreds of issue papers, charters, guidelines and treaties have been presented at scores of international meetings, each becoming a building block in the creation of what would eventually become Sustainable Development.

Finally in 1992 the UN's Earth Summit in Brazil brought all of these ideas together in two major documents called "Agenda 21" and the "Biodiversity Treaty." Here the ideas were officially presented to world leaders that all government on every level, needed to be transformed into top-down control over housing, food production, energy, water, private property education, population control, gun control, transportation, social welfare, medical care, and literally every aspect of our lives.

To get the full picture, add to these the UN's Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, both of which create UN-mandates on abortion, child rearing and government interference on families.

In 1993 President Clinton created the President's Council on Sustainable Development. From that Council came a flood of policy papers and recommendations to enforce it as government policy.

And the Clinton Administration didn't need Congress to get into the act. All Cabinet officials had to do was change some wording of existing programs and reroute already-approved funding to begin to implement the agenda - without Congress and without debate. Former Commerce Secretary Ron Brown told a meeting of the President's Council that he could implement 67% of the Sustainable Development agenda in his agency with no new legislation. Other agencies like Interior, EPA, HUD and more did the same thing. To help it all along, Clinton issued a blizzard of Executive Orders.