Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[JosephSHaas]

http://www.valley-news.com/vol1/community/valleybuzz/post/vermonts-best-daily-newspaper

"Jim Kenyon, staff columnist: Received the Mavis Doyle Award for his columns on the Hartford Police Department. The award is named after a legendary Vermont reporter who stood up for the underdog."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mod:

http://www.vnews.com/news/otherside/t_eight.htm

"Behind the Bylines

Jim Kenyon, 41, graduated in 1977 from Windsor High School and in 1981 from St. Michael's College in Colchester, Vt. Before joining the Valley News in 1996, he spent eight years at the Tampa Tribune. In last year's contest sponsored by the New England Associated Press News Executive Association, he received two first-place awards for enterprise and sports writing. He lives in Norwich with his wife and two children."

"Copyright © 2001 Valley News
All Rights Reserved " 11 years ago, thus 41+11= 52 now.

[JosephSHaas]

the underdog."

Oh really?  Can you tell by his latest "story"?: "

Re: The "Concord Monitor", Sunday, May 20th, 2012 @ pages D1+4

"THE BROWNS' REVENGE
Five years later, property taxes remain unpaid
By JIM KENYON, Valley News

--An anniversary, of sorts, is coming up next month.  On June 7, five years will have passed since the U.S. Marshal's Service deployed armed federal agents to seize the two-story office building in West Lebanon that once housed Elaine Brown's dental practice.
--Last week, I peered through the first-floor windows of the shuttered building, which is situated across the street from the Powerhouse Mall on Glen Road.  Dentist chairs, spittoons, electric drills and other tools of Brown's trade still fill exam rooms.
--For property tax purposes, the city has assessed the building and commercially zoned one-acre lot at $995,000.
--'It's ridiculous that it just sits there,' said Bruce Waters, senior real estate broker for Long McLaughty Commercial in West Lebanon. 'At this point, the land might be worth more than the building.'
--In neighboring Plainfield, the private road leading to Elaine and Ed Brown's house is blocked by a padlocked metal gate. 'U.S. Property. No Trespassing,' warn signs nailed to trees at the entrance of the 100-acre parcel.
--Plainfield listers have assessed the property's value at $675,000.
--The house has been unoccupied since the Browns' nine month standoff ended peacefully in October 2007, when under-cover U.S. Marshal agents duped the tax-evading couple into thinking they were sympathizers with their anti-government crusade.  The Browns had gone nearly a decade without paying federal taxes on roughly $2 million of income.
--In 2008, the Browns were convicted of weapons, conspiracy and tax-related felonies that virtually guaranteed they will spend the rest of their lives - apart - See BROWNS - D4

behind bars. (Neither is scheduled for release until the early 2040.)
--Ed Brown, 69, is serving his time at the federal prison in Marion, Ill.  Elaine Brown, 71, who has suffered from failing health in recent years, is at a medical center for federal inmates in Fort Worth, Texas.
--Even though they are behind prison walls, the Browns may be getting a bit of revenge.  In the years leading up to their standoff, the Browns placed the titles to their properties in a half dozen or so private trusts controlled by multiple trustees.
--Before the federal government could sell the two properties, which have a combined assessed value of $1.6 million, the Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Justice Department had to figure out whether the trusts were legitimate and if the trustees even existed.
--I think it's fair to assume that untangling the Browns' real estate web didn't rank with hunting down Osama bin Laden on the feds' priority list.  Thus, the office building in West Lebanon and house in Plainfield have sat empty for nearly five years.
--Meanwhile, the meter has been running since 2008 on the Browns' unpaid property taxes.  In Lebanon, the bill has reached $150,232.  Even in a small city with a $49.2 million budget that's no small amount.  I imagine the non-profit social services agencies that had their contributions from the city slashed this year might have benefited from those extra dollars in Lebanon's coffers.
--In Plainfield, the Browns' delinquent property tax tab, including interest, stands at $109,460. 'For a town our size, it's a big deal.' said Plainfield Town Administrator Steve Halleran.
--In December, the Justice Department finally initiated the legal proceedings needed for the government to obtain the right to sell the properties. In federal court documents, a Justice Department lawyer argued the Browns had established 'sham trusts' and transferred 'property into the names of those 'trusts' with the intent to defraud creditors including the United States.'
--In April, Ed Brown responded to the feds with a handwritten note. 'My Lord and savior the Christ Jesus advises me that I shall not comply to your requests and/or requirements, because of my moral principles of right, wrong and honor.'  ) Apparently, 4 1/2 years in prison haven't changed Brown's feelings about the federal government.)
--With the Justice Department looking to collect nearly $3 million in unpaid federal taxes, interest and penalties, it's unlikely that, even if the two properties fetch top dollar at auction, there will be enough money to go around.
--So where does that leave Lebanon and Plainfield tax-payers?
--The feds stand to get the first bite of the apple, but not necessarily the biggest bite, layers for the two communities told me last week.  The folks in Washington might recover some expenses, including the cost of prosecuting the Browns and maintaining the two properties since they were seized. (Judging from the over-grown shrub-bery and rot-ting window frames at the West Lebanon office building, however, the feds haven;t spent a lot on upkeep.)
--But there's good reason to believe that Lebanon and Plainfield will eventually receive their delinquent tax money, a combined $260,000 to date.  Municipalities owed property taxes tend to be placed near the front of the collection line, said Shawn Tanguay, a Lebanon attorney who is representing the city in the matter.  (I called Andrew De Mello, the Justice Depart-ment attorney in Washington handling the case, but he declined to talk about it.)
--'There's not a whole lot the town can do at this point.  It's in federal court.' said Plainfield's town attorney, Barry Schuster, of Lebanon. 'We agree with what the federal government is doing to clear the title and sell the property.'
--When might it all be resolved?  'Maybe not months,' said Schuster, 'but hopefully not years.'
--That would be good.  Just like the Browns' property tax bills, and ending is long over-due."

Words to the page D1 color picture and page D4 B&W photo to follow, plus that insert that indented into columns #2 + 3 of 4 on page D4 being: "Nearly five years in prison hasn't changed Ed Brown's feelings about the feds." "

[JosephSHaas]

the underdog."

Oh really?

"
With my comment here of back to Jim, of: of course not!  What do you expect!? when the Feds did violate the Sixth (6th) Amendment* by having preliminary hearings before Judge Geo. Z. Singal (who was ordered by McAuliffe to attend to the trial of HERE in the state of New Hampshire and district of where the offense occurred and not) in Portland, Maine that are a PART of the trial, when no 18USC3232** "consent" was given by ANY of them, including Cirino Gonzalez who even got a written and pre-signed offer of to waive this right by Arnold Huftallen, Assistant U.S. Attorney when he was at the Merrimack County Jail in Boscawen.  Reno refused, but that they trucked him and them (of Ed & Elaine, plus Danny and Jason too) over there anyway!  When are the people, us tax-payers, and/or tax-protesters going to learn that the militant actions by corrupt agents of "Uncle Sam" to militate as using FORCE as evidence ought not to control over the rights of us Article 12 inhabitants and Article 30 citizens!! who have the exculpatory evidence of the Federal non-filing to N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 as required by 1-8-17 BEFORE any group "Consent" can ever over-ride our individual refusal to "Consent" to these "other laws" of the U.S. Codes never "Consent"ed to here!  Get with it Jim: your emphasis on time in the QUANTITY of years spent there is only one factor upon which he based his decision on.  Where be the QUALITY of his right to be rehabilitated as is supposed to be a guarantee by N.H. Bill of Rights, Article 18? He's filed for this course with so many classes in English being the common denominator for ALL crimes, of it would have gotten into the subject matter that a tax is not a debt, but a mere charge, but then these corrupt bastards of Uncle Sam are afraid of the truth.  The truth being, as you stated, of which I thank you, but not having gone into any details YET as to why, being the fact that the property taxes were paid THROUGH 2007, of in-cluding the day and time of the capture on October 4th, 2007 because what was contracted for by the offer and payment and acceptance?  Answer: Article 12 protection, but that was never reciprocated.  And so the government of both the locals and the Feds expect the 2008+ property taxes to be paid anyway!?  You have got to be shitting me! Wise Up!  Plus who are these other so-called creditors with the intent to defraud upon them?  Show me one.  Come on, don't write what you THINK is out there.  Just go to the Deeds Office, is or are their any other liens?  Of course not!  So stop lying to the public! Plus The Feds do not have any "right" to sell THE property.  They MAY have the power to quit their claim over to some manceptor who takes the property sold in his hand being the QuitClaim Deed or ACT on paper / parchment with ink under a "Sale with All Faults" for Better or WORSE! (;-), but not the real estate (of land and building) like for if and when ever the auctioneer does TRY to sell whatever that they tell the people up-front of that they merely do quit their claim as so-called of having arrived at that point in time by lawful* and legal** means that they KNOW was not done! and so putting them into a culpable mental state for criminal action as by way of an Indictment or Presentment by the Grand Jury of whatever county, or counties to charge them with whatever. Of yes, it would be nice to be able to have a portion of the forced taxes go to "benefit" others in "need" under the "social service" banner, even though such compelling to pay might be against their religion, as is another guarantee by N.H. Article 5, at least then of when the caretakers of the not half dozen, but only two trusts of ATT & TQS for Lebanon and Plainfield respectfully, are put back to where they belong, as ending this falsehood of not the trusts but that of these agents of "Uncle Sam" having placed under that lie or falseness by Governor Lynch who was and still is charged by his Article 51 duty for which he is ( RSA Ch. 93-B:1-5 bonded to $200,000 by that National Grange Insurance Company, on West Street in Keene and ) Article 41 responsible for to execute the laws of the state AND the United States BOTH that includes the sword AND the shield of this Article 12 protection, but that of which he has violated his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office, and so ought to be Article 40 impeached, as well as the Article 63 impeachment of the Executive Councilors who are beyond lazy to utter corruption for KNOWing that Paul Broder, the N.H. A.G. Investigator told me of WHY the state allowed such was because we supposedly live withIn the First Federal "District" that includes several states when it is actually WRONG, in that we of N.H. and Maine are in SEPARATE districts withIN the First Circuit; get it!? So your surmising that "there's good reason to believe" that the two municipalities WILL eventually receive their "delinquent" tax money is WRONG! To be a delinquent, one is either over-due in pament of some debt, as taxes are a mere charge that MAY be lawful +/or legal, but not a debt, as only the latter is owed, and by the lien process of to be able to offer an Elegit of up to a "moiety" or half ( 1/2, 50%) the apples of the tree, since we frowned against King George in "He has" #10 of 18 in our "Declaration of Independence", in that of not to go after the "substance", so in this case, Uncle Sam has a "substance abuse problem" REALLY bad! and both Attorneys Shawn Tanguay and Barry Schuster of Lebanon each for Lebanon and Plainfield KNOW this but do try to keep the truth under their hats of which cover-up I find really disgusting because by their RSA Ch. 311:6 oath they are to report any and all corruptions to the judges so that the wrongs can be righted. Both Ed & Elaine's tools of their "trade" are exempt by the RSA Ch. 480 homestead statute, and for what reason? so as to put them of the instruments into the "warehouse" too, and still call it a Federal "Correctional" Institution?!  Come on! That's FALSE Advertising and you know it.  That is THE "sham"! Of the Feds do not OWN the Property, but have merely "seized" it, or have they?  The word seize, of yes it taken by force, but was that force legal? No, and thus not really a seizure either because such is "To take into LEGAL custody; confiscate" but that we are supposed to have procedural due process of law here in the country, meaning The Rule of Law, that the end does NOT justify the means! Thus who are the real evaders, of avoiding by deceit = mis-representation, = the in-correct-ness proven by the fact that there has been no correction in the FCI's and so two wrongs do NOT make a right! The Feds are dis-honest, = pro-ceeding FROM that gained by FALSEness of them having no jurisdictional authority here of NOT the "same", but "similar" power definition of the word "like" in 1-8-17 of the U.S. Constitution, and WHERE? over all the land of New Hampshire? No! Only that as for which is bought by them with the Consent of the Legislature of the state they WISH to operate in, and of our CONDITIONAL Consent to them of June 10, 1883 not accepted, and so by the Adams case of 1943 as found in their own U.S. Attorney Manual 664 an offer un-accepted is NOT Consent! and so there being this lack of probity = integrity = rigid adherence to a code of values; as in the U.S. Code, and specifically 18 USC 3232 as previously indicated that they be in violation of, and NOT that CIVIL RUle 72.5 applied to the CRIMINAL as O.K.'d by former Federal Rep. Paul Hodes who was a LIAR to the original lie given to him indirectly through his Concord, N.H. secretary Jane Pauly, from Deputy Clerk Dan Lynch the original liar for no check and balance by Hodes to have Singal impeached, and current Federal Rep. Frank Guinta chicken -shit- who also needs to be replaced this Fall, unless he does "Wise Up" in the meantime to have Singal impeached. Of the integrity word from the Latin word integrare of "to make complete" as in our 1883 offer to be accepted to be for to be "complete", as yet another guarantee by Article 14 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights."

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/330913/tax-code-playing-millions-for-suckers

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/330913/tax-code-playing-millions-for-suckers#comment-230143

of: "
Who wrote this garbage?
By JosephSHaas - 05/21/2012 - 2:43 am New

What a bunch of garbage! WHO wrote this trash?
First of all the 16th Amendment reads of that the Congress has the power "to lay and collect" taxes in the un-uniform as opposed to that of in Article I, Section 8, Clause 1of the 1-8-18 enforcement clause only to those of the "foregoing Powers". The Sixteenth Amendment has no Section 2 enforcement clause, like in the surrounding ones of 14 and 15 in sections 5 and 2 respectfully.
The word lay can mean to either apply or impose. So your use of the word "levies" from the word levy of to impose is YOUR decision, not mine, nor that of Ed Brown either, of thank you for the Jim Kenyon story in yesterday's paper @ pages D1+4 from your sister publication of The "Valley News".
For me of back in 1983 when the IRS wanted $62,000 from me as a landlord of secondary money I told them to go pound sand in case #M.83-50-D as I chose the more consumer-friendly definition of the word lay to mean of that of a request and so said: request DENIED! (;-)
You go on to say of some "duty" to a tax liability as owed, but that a tax is NOT a debt owed, but a mere charge and so I call you a bunch of liars! At least you wrote of not the evade word, but of the legal right to avoid, as the former is avoidance by deceit = mis- representation = of to be in-correct or dis-honest, of I call the agents of Uncle Sam thieves of victims to warehouses called FCIs."

&

"
Tax code playing millions for suckers
By Monitor staff
May 21, 2012
Share this

    Email
    Comments (1)
    Raise Your VoiceRaise Your Voice
    Print
    Share on facebook Share on google_plusone More Sharing Services 3

The choice of words in the news reports was inevitable: Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin, who became worth nearly $4 billion as a result of Friday's public offering of Facebook stock, "de-friended" the United States and renounced his American citizenship.
Through a spokesman, Saverin said that the far lower tax rate in his new home of Singapore played no role in his decision. But then, that's what they all say, all the mega-millionaires and billionaires who renounce their U.S. citizenship to live in low-tax havens like Ireland, Belize, Hong Kong, Singapore and the Cayman Islands. Because the United States taxes the assets of wealthy Americans who renounce their citizenship, Saverin did have to pay roughly a half-billion dollars in taxes on his assets. But by one estimate, because Singapore does not tax capital gains, he escaped paying between $68 million and $364 million in taxes that he would have owed had he remained an American.
Saverin's defection was particularly galling because he came to the United States as a refugee from Brazil. Many of the new "Facebook millionaires" will legally escape a fortune in taxes by setting up trusts. And Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg reportedly plans to use perfectly legal strategies to pay no taxes at all on some $23 billion of Facebook stock. This news should accomplish several things:
• The majority of Americans, who pay rates of 10 to 35 percent on their income, should feel like suckers. That, in turn, should increase the pressure on Congress to reform the nation's morally bankrupt tax code.
• Saverin's decision should lead to changes in U.S. policy toward wealthy Americans who renounce their citizenship to escape taxation. Some 1,781 Americans renounced their citizenship in 2011, many for tax reasons. That number is expected to increase if the Bush tax cuts expire, as it appears they will, or if the Buffet rule that levies a 30-percent effective tax rate on millionaires becomes law.
Yale law and political science professor Bruce Ackerman suggests that people who renounce their American citizenship for tax purposes should be allowed to return only in cases of extreme hardship, not for visits. That's an idea worth considering, since it would serve to deter others who make a fortune from then trying to escape their duty to the land that made the acquisition of their wealth possible.
• The great Facebook tax avoidance scheme should also focus attention on people who retain their U.S. citizenship but avoid taxation by parking their money offshore. One of those people, Mitt Romney, is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
The Romneys closed their Swiss bank account in 2010 in preparation for the presidential campaign. But they have, according to news reports, tens of millions of dollars in accounts in the Cayman Islands, plus money stashed in Ireland and Bermuda.
"I can tell you we follow the tax laws," Romney said while on the campaign trail in New Hampshire earlier this year. "And if there's an opportunity to save taxes, we like anybody else in this country, will follow that opportunity."
That's not true. Most Americans file Form 1040s and have no significant ability to reduce their tax liability. Some are happy to pay all they owe, and others, out of gratitude for the opportunity this nation afforded them, pay a bit extra. Even among the truly wealthy, sheltering money in foreign tax havens is the exception, not the rule. We'd like to believe that that's because there's something un-American about not paying your fair share, especially when the nation is at war and mired in debt."

[JosephSHaas]

" From: EDWARD BROWN (03923049)
Date: 5/21/2012 9:18:29 AM
Subject: If You Don't Hear From Me
Message: Hi :
     I have been accused for destroying a 1/2 cent
mailing label by attaching the label to outgoing mail
which is allowed by the B.O.P.s own definition.

     The Staff here is now spending hundreds of $$$$
to go through a typical process of fraud and theft to
fabricate this case against me for this innocent attaching
of a label to a letter that was of an address of a couple of
friends that I was sending to Elaine. 

     We can now understand how and why the UNITED STATES
government is in such massive debt of trillions of dollars.

     These labels are purchased under the inmates/prisoners
Trust Fund and belongs to the inmates/prisoners. The staff
however seems to feel that these labels are government property.
The inmates are the beneficiary of they trust and what they
 purchase with these funds belong to them. Wow!

     the D.O.J. people are doing exactly what the D.O.J./U.S. Attorney
 did to us in the courts with the help of the judges. They follow
the same maniacal process: Hegelian: Create the Crime, take
us to a rigged court, find us guilty by disallowing us any defence.

     By the time the Terrorist unit out of Martinsburg, West Virginia
completes their further abuse and waste the D.O.J. will add thousands
of more wasted $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
 for their own weird justifacation. This is National Socialism at it's best:

This is constant due process in this unit.

"ORDO AB CHAO"
God Bless.
See you soon.
Ed...end"

&

From: " admin at inmatemessage dot com
Date: 5/21/2012 8:34:22 AM
Subject: Inmate: BROWN, EDWARD
Message: This is a system generated message informing you the above mentioned federal inmate temporarily does not have access to messaging.  You will receive notification when they are again eligible for messaging.
Este es un sistema generado mensaje que le informa al interno mencionado federales temporalmente no tiene acceso a la mensajer?a. Usted recibir? una notificaci?n cuando son de nuevo objeto de mensajer?a."

Of they let the explanation letter out AFTER the block that is still in place, as not being able to write to Ed at this point in time.

[JosephSHaas]

Can somebody please investigate this.  I'm swamped.

"From: EDWARD BROWN (03923049)
Date: 5/21/2012 9:17:22 AM
Subject: Olinski's Rules
Message: Joe:
      Could you get me a copy of Olinsky's Rules/Laws
or it could be spelled Alinski or alinsky?

Off the computer.
See you soon.
Thanks Ed...end"

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Mod: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals

"Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals is the last book written by community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, published in 1971 shortly before his death. In it, Alinsky describes his theory and methods of organizing to the current generation of young activists, largely drawing upon his own experiences. . .

An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a situation. Alinsky would say, "The first step in community organization is community disorganization."

Through a process combining hope and resentment, the organizer tries to create a "mass army" that brings in as many recruits as possible from local organizations, churches, services groups, labor unions, corner gangs, and individuals.

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. "The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength."[3]

In a separate chapter he suggests that the perennial question, "Does the end justify the means?" is meaningless as it stands: the real and only question regarding the ethics of means and ends is, and always has been, "Does this particular end justify this particular means?"

[JosephSHaas]

"
. . . community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, . . . . "

I've read up to the "Early Jobs" section and found that "  His early efforts to "turn scattered, voiceless discontent into a UNITED protest aroused the admiration of Illinois governor Adlai Stevenson, who said Alinsky's aims 'most faithfully reflect our ideals of brotherhood, tolerance, charity and dignity of the individual.'"[4]  "  of interest, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky (emphasis ADDed.)

Reference what I found last night: "I was just watching "Zola Levitt Ministries" * on ABC-TV Family Channel 66 on here tonight and in a search of the two words: blessings and unity, did find this interesting webpage at GOOGLE to explore later, as to the side notes in my 1800s Bible with the metal clasps as like the coffee table version: http://www.precepts.com/StudyMaterials/Articles/DailyWalk/The_Blessings_of_Unity.html * http://www.levitt.tv/  "

[JosephSHaas]

"
. . . community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, . . . . "

. . .  into a UNITED protest . . .  http://www.precepts.com/StudyMaterials/Articles/DailyWalk/The_Blessings_of_Unity.html * http://www.levitt.tv/  "

Here's a copy and paste, to get to those side / foot notes later:

"The Blessings of Unity
Study Center | Home Page | PDF Version

Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity. It is like the precious ointment upon the head, that ran down upon the beard, even Aaron’s beard: that went down to the skirts of his garments; As the dew of Hermon, and as the dew that descended upon the mountains of Zion: for there the Lord commanded the blessing, even life for evermore (Psalm 133:1-3).

Only Christians (brethren) can truly dwell in unity. The world can come together, but they cannot be unified. True unity is supernatural. It comes from the Holy Spirit. When two sinners come together, one plus one equals two. When two Christians come together, one plus one equals ten thousand (Deuteronomy 32:30). The world adds but the Holy Spirit multiplies.

In Psalm 133, verse 1, David spoke of the goodness and pleasantness of Christian unity. In verses 2 and 3, he spoke of the blessings of unity. The blessings are two-fold: power and refreshment.

Unity is first like the oil that ran down Aaron’s beard to the skirts of his garment. Oil represents the power of the Holy Spirit. Aaron was the high priest. When the anointing oil was placed on his head, it ran onto his beard and down his garments to the bottom tassels. This is a type of the baptism of the Holy Spirit. On the Day of Pentecost, the oil of the Holy Spirit was poured upon our great High Priest, Jesus (Hebrews 1:9). It then ran down to the garments, the 120 waiting in the upper room on that day. It has continued to flow throughout the Church age and will one day reach the last tassel on the hem of the garment when the final person is born again. Jesus will then return for His body, His Church.

Secondly, unity is like the dew that descended on Mount Hermon. Dew speaks of supernatural refreshment that comes from the Holy Spirit. The Spirit not only comes to bring us power, but as Isaiah tells us, “this is the rest…this is the refreshing…” Isaiah was referring to the “…stammering lips and another tongue” mentioned in the previous verse (Isaiah 28:11,12).

In an atmosphere of spiritual unity, there is power and refreshing. Where there is unity, the Lord commands blessings. No wonder we are exhorted to “strive to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3).

Bob Yandian

If you like this article, check out Pastor Bob's series The Power of Unity at the BYM Store.

Copyright 2009 by Bob Yandian Ministries.
Reproduction of this material in whole or part in any format without written permission is prohibited. All Rights Reserved."

[JosephSHaas]

From: josephshaas mat hotmail dot com
To: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov
Subject: " Honorary degree to Jeffrey R. Howard; say what !? "
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:19:58 -0400

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/330826/push-and-pull-and-be-not-afraid

over to: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/330826/push-and-pull-and-be-not-afraid#comment-230239

of: "
Honorary degree to Jeffrey R. Howard; say what !?
By JosephSHaas - 05/21/2012 - 2:13 pm New
Say what? Former N.H. A.G. Jeffrey R. Howard, of the First Circuit Court of Appeals on the 4th floor of the Warren B. Rudman block at 53 Pleasant Street in Concord given an honorary diploma!? You have got to be kidding me! This guy is a thief who ought to be arrested and serve time at The Big House in Concord being the N.H. State Prison.
His crime: stealing our tax-payer money and giving it to his Brothers of the Bar Association to travel to, at and back from Portland, Maine of outside the "district" of where the offense occurred in the Ed Brown case of within the district of New Hampshire.
He KNOWS better but steals anyway! Of the 6th Amendment reads that of ALL trials, not just SOME, "shall" take place withIN the state and district of where they occurred, AND that 18USC3232 is the statute that backs it up, of these preliminary hearings a PART of the trial, that can be waived if BOTH parties "consent", like in civil cases by 28USC636(c)(1) and Rule 72.5, but that of Howard and his goons applying CIVIL Rules in a CRIMINAL case, of that just plain wrong. He is a THIEF! who ought to be impeached, but that Congressmen like Frank Guinta of Manchester are "chicken". He sets up some "Blue Ribbon Panel" to investigate corruption, but not when it goes against one of his buddies. What a jerk! It's time for him to leave too. To be voted out to pasture for where the lazy go."

From:
"
Concord
'Push and pull and be not afraid'
Message to graduates of UNH School of Law: Go and do your part . . .
By Melanie Plenda / For the Monitor
May 20, 2012

. . . Lewis* was one of four honorary degree recipients. The others were U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, Randall Rader, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and Jeffrey Howard, U.S. Court of Appeals judge for the First Circuit."

* "Congressman John Lewis gives the commencement address at the University of New Hampshire School of Law's 37th graduation ceremony on Saturday, May 19, 2012. Lewis was a legendary civil right's leader and participated in the Freedom Rides in 1961, as well as being a keynote speaker at the historic March on Washington in 1963"

[JosephSHaas]

From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov
Subject: The 6th Amendment is supposed to pre-vent TIRED attorneys!
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:40:26 -0400

Jay, for Frank Guinta, of to please Impeach this Singal.

The Five Executive Councilors to seriously consider that Jim Bassett did (and/or still does) deal with the Feds, and that of him having NEVER encountered ANY corruption in any of his court cases!?  You have got to be shitting me! Please ask him if he ever SAW or HEARD of any corruption, and WHY he did not report same to either the PCC or the judges by his RSA Ch. 311:6 oath.

Joe Haas

Re: "
· · Share · about an hour ago ·
Options
Damn VanMeter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7zotYU21qcU
Chris Hedges "Brace Yourself! The American Empire Is Over & The Descent Is Going To Be Horrifying!"
www.youtube.com
January 01, 2012 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com/
· · Share · about an hour ago ·

    You like this.
        Joseph S Haas Thanks Donna for this almost 3-hour video (2:54:27 to be exact) seen 330,715 times, of me to the 7-minute mark only, finding it interesting that of him having been away for two decades of returning to America to see how people have gotten used to style over content and even voted for such as he spells out in his 2008 "Empire of Illusion" book, and illusion over substance, as he wrote in his "Death of the Liberal Class" book of 2010 that was supposed to be of the middle, and not that of tagged to the left nowadays, resulting in 1/3rd of us of the population now in poverty and #x-number of libraries closed, thus leading to ignoramuses like the jurors in the Ed Brown case who never looked into seeing HOW they did finally get the case, of preliminary hearings being a PART of the trial, but them too chicken to say: out-of-order if and when they ever did or do learn that the 6th Amendment was broken in these travels to, at and back from Portland, Maine as the end does NOT justify the means, in that we are supposed to have procedural due process of law, meaning the Rule of Law, and so in a way of them looking at the judge as in what? the style or mode of transportation from New Hampshire to, at and back from Maine was pleasant without recognized protest from either withIN or withOUT that of after being dragged over to there, that whatever they say and do in court of both parties is not done after having gone over #x-number of hurdles and so not tired!? Even Attorney Sven Wiberg of Portsmouth for Dan Riley said that he was too tired to defend for his client, of the Judge Geo. Z. Singal said: get a cup of coffee! What a bunch of crap! If anybody should be tired of travel it would have to be the judge assigned to the case by Judge McAuliffe. Of Singal too lazy. Of maybe the solution might be for this and other future cases, of this to overturn, being like a referee in a boxing match calling it off due to tiredness of the opponent beaten to a pulp, of some "Uncle Sam" doctor there to grade the condition of the Esquires, as in not tired from unlawful and illegal travels as also against 18USC3232. "Is there a doctor in the house?" ought to be the new modern-day question, of to the court-house too! I'm serious! To gauge the condition of the defenders and if low, to find out the reason WHY and prescribe an Impeachment for judges not abiding by the law as outlaws! Impeach the bastards, now! cc: to my Federal Rep.
        about a minute ago · "

[JosephSHaas]

RE: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/331112/former-teacher-senator-to-run-for-senate-seats

over to: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/331112/former-teacher-senator-to-run-for-senate-seats#comment-230301

of: "
Boot the bum out! N.H. Senator Matthew Houde is a "hood".*
By JosephSHaas - 05/22/2012 - 1:45 am New

"Matthew Houde of Plainfield" is a disgrace!
He's an attorney.
Need I say more? (;-)
* a hoodlum = thug = a thief!

as in he has allowed "Uncle Sam" to steal the "substance" of the Ed Brown house, when the "Declaration of Independence" was against such practice by "He has" #10 of 18, when we told King George back then that he had a "substance abuse problem".
Of the property taxes were paid by the Browns to 2007, but when the town, county and State failed in their part of the contract for the Article 12 "protection" from "other laws" as in the U.S. Codes never 1-8-17 "Consent"ed to, and they arrested him to be thrown into a warehouse they call an F.C.I. but with no course with #x-number of classes in the subject matter that a tax is not a debt, but a charge, then when Houde refused as the then State Rep. to impeach Lynch for his Article 51 duty to execute the laws of the State AND the United States BOTH of for the sword AND the shield, he showed his true colors as a crook of being far away from any Article 18 rehabilitation, of crooked of away from his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to obey the law of that INcludes Article 12, for which the governor "shall" be Article 41 responsible for, but that Houde lets Lynch "off the hook". What a disgrace. Time to throw the bum out! WHO will run against this creep?"

[JosephSHaas]

Thanks Dennis, and especially for this explanation of: "Rotacude
May 21, 2012 at 3:07 AM

Even the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the 2nd Amendment’s final report in 2008 stated in its last two paragraphs that the National Guard was NOT the Militia talked about in the 2nd Amendment. . . Court has stated in the Williams case, among others that no words are meaningless in the founding documents. “‘In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word [ * ]  must have its due force and appropriate meaning; for it is evident from the whole instrument, that no word was unnecessarily used, or needlessly added. * * * Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood.’” Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553, 572-73 (1933).

Kachonka
May 21, 2012 at 5:06 AM
I can’t make out what you are saying. Is it English?

    Rotacude
    May 21, 2012 at 11:58 AM

    I understand your predicament. You were educated in an American public school. It’s not your fault. (BTW, I’ve taught in public schools for eight years and am certified in math and science in two states, so don’t take my comment as coming from someone who doesn’t see the problem.) If you can’t make out what I’m saying, you need to reread it until you do. It’s not rocket science, but it might take a little bit of thinking. If that hurts, take a pain med and try again." (:-)                                                                                                             [ * ] That's what I've been saying in the Ed Brown case of when Judge David Hacket Souter (from Hopkinton, N.H.) in Boston for the First Circuit wrongly assigned the "same" definition to that of the word "like" in 1-8-17 of the U.S. Constitution when it was and is supposed to be "similar", in that of "exclusive" jurisdiction in Washington, D.C. and "like" or similar jurisdiction over the lands purchased by "Consent" of the Legislature in each state, of when the state's CONDITIONAL Offer to "Uncle Sam" is that of for "concurrent jurisdiction" in order to serve civil or criminal process on Federal soil, that is the exception to exclusiveness of NOT the "same" as in D.C. but "similar" to some degree of not needing to be the "same", as in D.C. with exclusiveness, and here too in N.H. by RSA Ch. 123:1 but with this exception.  Of by the U.S. Attorney Manual 664  http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm citing the Adams case of 1943, an offer un-accepted gives NO JURISDICTIONAL Authority for these "other laws" of Congress being the U.S. Codes to apply to us Article 12 "inhabitants" (nor Article 30 citizens) for which we pay property taxes for this protection, but get lousy service in return, of actually no service as the local, county and State officials who take the RSA Ch. 92:2 oath  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm (see also: RSA Chapter 42:1  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/III/42/42-1.htm  for the locals)  to honor the law have thrown away the shield and go only by the sword as permitting Uncle Sam to run roughshod over us; as in the governor having refused and failed to Article 51 execute the laws of this state AND of the United States in BOTH the sword AND the shield of not to be "controllable" or "dominate"d over by these other laws, and so to have the governor Article 40 impeached http://www.nh.gov/constitution/senate.html or sued for theft (in Concord District Court  http://www.courts.state.nh.us/courtlocations/merrdistdir.htm#Concord or by an Indictment or Presentment in The Merrimack County Superior Court  http://www.courts.state.nh.us/courtlocations/merrsupedir.htm )  in taking his $xxx,xxx per year salary and not doing his job! of him instead pursing his own course of domineering over what is pre- scribed by the law! for which he is Article 41 "responsible for" http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html to pay the victims up to $200,000 each by RSA Ch. 93-B:1-5    http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-VI-93-B.htm   for his un- faithful performance of duty! of that Policy #_______ with The National Grange Insurance Company of West Street in Keene, N.H. of Eli there the claims investigator to give a call to right now. ____ - - - - - And so with a P.O.A. (Power of Attorney) from Ed & Elaine Brown, I did sue the City of Lebanon in Grafton County Superior Court case #_______ for theft of services un- performed per the contract to protect, but before a trial by jury the judge suggested that the Abatement process be sought of to gain credits from which the $amounts stolen could be applied to this and all future billings, and that was tried, but that they did limit the word assessment to that of only an appraisal, and not the unlawful tax billings of for: (1)  the unconstitutional state-wide education tax, nor (2)  (a) the overage beyond the definition of a school being the student body, or (b) at least of not beyond that of the definition of for the "common school" of limited to pay for the poor child of under the grades of High School (both: Senior and Junior), even though a forced contribution to the poor be a violation of our rights to religion, as is supposed to be a guarantee by Article 5 of The N.H. Bill of Rights! plus of course (3) of providing no protection to the individual, nor property from these "other laws" of the U.S. Codes un-Consent-ed to, of reference the latter of the Feds having seized the real estate (land and building) in Plainfield too [ ** ] with a TRY at an attempted forfeiture in-the-works, and so to report back to the Grafton County Superior Court of further non-protection not only against the individuals, but now the land and building, and so to bring forward that un- closed case there in North Haverhill, AND [ ** ] per the property in Plainfield, of that Abatement Application having been appealed to The BTLA: Board of Tax & Land Appeals to move forward with that case #______ there too, of the Clerk having set up a block or a hurdle to have to jump over of requiring a copy of the trust document, which request was denied as against RSA Ch. 564-A:7    http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LVI/564-A/564-A-7.htm   and them also demanding a filing fee in violation of Article 14. And so to impeach them too if they don't wise up and get over to that hearing on the merits. The bottom line being of to also file an RSA Ch. 480: homestead claim for the tools of their trades, and thus expose the absurdity of Uncle Sam having taken them of their "substance" as individuals against "He has" #10 of 18 in our "Declaration of Independence" of thus "Uncle Sam" with a substance abuse problem [ *** ] and since a tax is not a debt, but a charge to be determined by a civil trial by jury first in $amount of over $1500 by Article 20 N.H. Bill of Rights, that was attempted by Ed back in Case #2005-C-0033 in Grafton County, but that when the Assistant U.S. Attorney did ORDER the Court Clerk Rbt. B. Muh to REMOVE the case to Concord, he did so, in violation of 28USC636(c)(1) too in that both parties have to agree to such, as told to Judge Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe) Burling, but withOUT these magic numbers, so to speak, and who likewise ought to be impeached of her, and him having retired to Tuck St., in Littleton, N.H. or sue for theft of his paycheck too by not providing this block, within 2 years of his Dec. 2010 retirement by RSA Ch. 625:8,III(b) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/625/625-8.htm as so by November of this year: 2012 to the Haverhill District Court http://www.courts.state.nh.us/courtlocations/grafdistdir.htm#Haverhill reference the format of such Summons by RSA Ch. 594:14 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIX/594/594-14.htm concluding with the words from Article 88   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html of: "against the peace and dignity of the state." [ *** ] since the lien process does arise from the power of to issue a Writ of Elegit of to offer up to a "moiety" or half ( 1/2 ) the apples of the tree until the debt be paid, to use the tools of your trade 100% but having to fork over up to fifty (50%) percent of the net revenue, of this the way to go, and not to store either the individual nor their tolls in a warehouse and CALL it an F.C.I. of to "correct" when there be no course with #x-number of classes in the subject matter of the arrest, as against Article 18 of to rehabilitate.  Thus Uncle Sam with "False Advertising". cc: my five State Reps to impeach the governor and Judge Burling to relieve her of her Article 36 retirement pay as un- deserving.

[JosephSHaas]

Good luck Frank W. Szabo of Goffstown, running for Hillsborough County Sheriff this Fall. RE: this 4:20 minute video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjYKXAhfx2o entitled: "NH Sheriff candidate vows limits on Fed agents " seen 60 times so far, and with your Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Frank-W-Szabo-For-Sheriff-of-Hillsborough-County/277456675653327?sk=info with contact info of:    Frank at SzaboForSheriff dot com of I like your saying of when a Federal agent tells you to jump, you're going to ask of "Why?", not "How high?" Plus thank you David Ridley for this video of saying that this running for Sheriff has not been tried in too many places, and so where? Across the country in the Liberty movement? - - - - - Back in the 1990s I ran for Grafton County Sheriff here in New Hampshire on the slogan of: "A Man's Home is his Castle" and got 1/5th, then 1/4th, then 1/3rd of the votes, in each of the three times I ran consecutively every two years, that I might have next gotten a 1/2 plus 1 of the votes to win the Republican Primary if I was not "thrown" out of the county on a "so-called"  RSA Ch. 528:19 en-TITLE-ment   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LIV-528.htm  mis- defined by the judge as applicable to an RSA Ch. 528 for the real estate in a Petition to Quiet Title even though the Sheriff's Sale auction was advertised by RSA Ch. 528:16 of only 2 posters when it was supposed to be 4 of two more in two adjoining towns by RSA 529:20 and redeemed as such within the year or within the case by 529:26 the judge took the $7,500 redemption but did ORDER the Sheriff NOT to allow it as having been paid in full, but turned it over to the Plaintiffs of the two land developers from Canaan who sued me for "Champerty" as a Bounty Hunter of Missing Heirs on finder's fee deals that is my RIGHT of "free commercial speech" ( reference the Beineke case in Vol. 400 MAss. Reports ___ footnote #7 of 1987 as reported about for Bounty Hunter William Devine of Boston in the "Boston Herald" newspaper of 16Sept.1989 @ page 24 or vise versa of 24Sept.1989 @ page 16) as taken OFF the books of NOT the statutes as ALL offenses are to be defined by statute according to RSA Ch. 625:6 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/625/625-6.htm but the practice of such as "determined" by the judges through "custom" over the years, in the Adkins Plumbing & Heating case of Spring 1992, of the charge against me in the Fall of 1992! and this Sale in 1993 based on this fraud! leading to the theft of this building assessed at $500,000 and stolen rents of over $25,000 a year for over ten (10) years of another $250,000 plus, = over $750,000 stolen (see Proverbs 6:30-31 to charge the thief sevenfold the $amount TAKEn - of that the most defined word in the English language, as you can see from all this here too (;-), RSA Ch. 651:63 Restitution, as annotated by the State v. Fleming case of 1984 to a case and another case to Blackstone's Commentaries who quotes this Bible chapter and verse) of the Court Clerk AND Deputy Sheriff who both FAILed to notify my Corporate Clerk in Barrington, Strafford County, N.H. of a Notice of Hearing leading to a TEMPORARY or non-final Order by what''s called a Decree Pro Confess  http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/1999/douglas.htm   (even though we filed BOTH an Appearance AND written answer in court) of me and us entitled to a final Hearing on Damages (see the "In Equity Proceedings" paragraph of the Douglas v. Douglas of Chuck v. Caroline case of Year 2000) that the judge Rbt. E.K. Morrill (Retired) had written down to occur at "any" time in the future, that by RSA Ch. 21:2  for the "Common Usage" of words   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/I/21/21-2.htm does not mean "none", but which in effect as resulted in such moving way away from what should have been that 3-month redemption upon a corporation IF properly served, and THEN if not paid of so en-TITLE-d to the rents, as like a seat on the Board of Directors and NOT a take-over of the entire corporation! and so now the bidder wants to sell this so-called legal en-TITLE-ment by 529:19 of the land and building for "only" $300,000 (as he did pay only a nickel on the dollar of that being "Constructive Fraud" but that the N.H. Supremes "declined" to take the appeal back then because that would further my charge of: thief against the State court because by case law: when a judge (Js. D. O'Neill,III in this case) changes the position of the parties in a preliminary injunction he makes the court a party to extortion! A thief in the 2nd degree! of me the landlord for the corporation turned into a tenant of the bidder, in effect taking away the rent money to pay our attorney who withdrew) but with this defect of a "security" as like stock of the bidder TRYing to sell in the real estate market, but which wrong has been reported to the State of N.H. Insurance Dept. (since he can't buy any title insurance with this defect so as to be able to sell a Warranty Deed, nor me either as a TRY at to give him this as a "gift" proving that I could not purchase such) [ and so to what next? a Quitclaim Deed for $1.00 to try to mitigate the damages?] of them saying to go to the Real Estate Commission  http://www.nh.gov/nhrec/   in Concord to where the complaint now sits from its filing on Thu., May 31st of now over a week away with no action yet taken.  And so if Frank would like to visit there for when the hearing happens he's invited to like say that such corruption would never have happened in his county on his watch, but that it probably would never be given a chance to fester in that I conducted a survey of all ten counties several years ago and NONE had ever encountered such, of one Deputy Sheriff being on-the-job for over 1/4 century of her telling me that she had never encountered such ever plus another Sheriff who told me that the corporation when duly served DID pay up before any RSA Ch. 528:14 three month redemption time so as to avoid such. The Sheriff insured to $5 million for errors and omissions, but that the N.H. Supremes using a base opinion BEFORE a final opinion in a Continuing Violations Doctrine case that be not Article 14 "complete" and so ought to get them all Article 17 http://www.nh.gov/constitution/house.html  impeached for having violated their RSA Ch. 92:2 oaths of office   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm to Article 84   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html from:  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/constitution.html  of each one insured to $200,000 by RSA Ch. 93-B:1-5  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-VI-93-B.htm   for the faithful performance of their job x the 5 of them = $1 million by the National Grange Insurance Company, at 55 West Street in Keene, N.H., and so to see my State Rep.(s) who win(s) this Fall to put in such a bill please and Article 32 Petition  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html  for me to the House Redress of Grievance Committee too at:  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H45  plus to go after the Clerk: Robert B. Muh, of 102 Tuck Rd., in Littleton, Retired for having violated his oath to procedural due process of law too, as our Corporate Clerk did file an Appearance in the case but who was never notified after our temporary Attorney withdrew from the case, instead Muh sent the notice of hearing to my OLD residence to where I was kicked out from by the two Deputy Sheriffs! - - - - -  But getting back to the Feds here in N.H. in that before any of their agents can have jurisdictional authority over any of us Article 12 inhabitants to be controlled over by their "other laws" of the U.S. Codes, that their 40USC255 to 3112 "head" of "agency" has to file their operating papers by RSA Ch. 123:1  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm with our Secretary of State, as likewise in Florida the agent there has to file with the governor as the requirement in each state by  http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm (of this list thanks to Attorney Larry Becraft in Huntsville, Alabama  is different), and that the Feds have to comply with their own Rules too: U.S. Attorney Manual 664: http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm citing the Adams case of 1943 from the U.S. Supremes in that an OFFER of CONDITIONAL 1-8-17 U.S. "Consent" un- fulfilled is NOT "Consent"!  Reference ours to the Feds on June 14, 1883. And WHERE applicable? Of over the ENTIRE state? No! Only for "like" of not SAME but SIMILAR powers over their lands that they have purchased with the "Consent" of our Legislature or N.H. General Court.  And so the landlord of such places like the Federal Complex in Concord at 55 Pleasant Street there of both the James C. Cleveland and Warren B. Rudman Blocks, of the G.S.A.: General Services Administration landlord to have to file for his tenants there BEFORE they can control over us if and whenever we step foot on their property of NOT applicable to PRIVATE property within their district being territorial in nature to read these definitions in the dictionary that mean for in personam and so not in rem, and so the kidnapping of Ed & Elaine Brown unlawful, and those preliminary hearings in Portland, Maine outside the state AND district of where the offense occurred as such are a PART of the trial were thus illegal AND unlawful(ly held by Judge Geo. Z. Singal - of Maine, of him needing to be Federally impeached by one of our 44 N.H. Federal Reps - yes you read that right, of 1 per every 300,000 per the law of Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 U.S. Constitution)  by 18USC3232 AND the Sixth (6th) Amendment, but which shield of Article 12 protection was not afforded them as supposed to be a guarantee AND by governor's duty per Article 51  of which he is Article 41 responsible for http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html for both the sword AND the shield of John H. Lynch, of Hopkinton, the governor doing only half his Article 51 duty of to execute the laws of this state AND that of the United States, preferring only the latter, but taking his $xxx,xxx salary being paid what? fortnightly too? or all at once like the State Reps (of their Article 15 compensation of: $100 a year in silver dollars?) of like an Attorney's Retainer BEFORE doing ANY of the work? And so to sue him (and his N.H. State Trooper David Cargil -turned U.S. Marshal under an Obama appointment as a Democrat who REFUSED to set up an Ed Brown Protection fund, instead spending $5.00 to send me back my $1.00 bill by certified mail) within the RSA Ch.  625:8,III(b) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/625/625-8.htm  two years of leaving office this Dec. 31st for RSA Ch. 637:5    Theft by Extortion! http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/637/637-5.htm To call the State Treasurer  http://www.nh.gov/treasury/  now at: http://www.nh.gov/treasury/Tinfo/ContactUs.htm 271-2621 to get this info; ____ and monitor how the Feds attempt to steal more in rem of land and buildings in Lebanon and Plainfield from the Trusts set up by the Browns after their seizure to a TRY at to forfeit.  But that of the Browns with homestead rights of $100,000 each to assert in County Court(s) if needed, because the power to lien does arise by the power of to issue a Writ of Elegit for to pay up to half the apples of the tree until the debt be paid, and that the Federal income taxes here have NEVER been declared a debt owed by Ed Brown's case #2005-C-033 in Grafton County Superior Court in that the Court Clerk Muh again, with the permission of then State Judge Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe) Burling did allow the Feds to Remove and Dismiss but withOUT the Plaintiffs Brown 28USC636(c)(1) "consent"! and so to have her impeached too! so as not to receive any more of her Article 36 retirement money, as un- deserving that is supposed to be up for review every year. These corrupt agents of "Uncle Sam" being the bad apples in the barrel as sociopaths in extreme denial to the truth as militants under the word militate to have force as evidence, of "He has" #10 of 18 in our "Declaration of Independence" that they wave the flag for every July 4th against this "substance" abuse, of you do not throw an individual into jail until AFTER the debt due is not paid as to charge with criminal theft of at least in an offer to pay WHILE the business is on-going, and especially not to warehouse them in an F.C.I. (Federal Correctional Institution) and call it such is FALSE ADVERTISING withOUT any Article 18 rehabilitation course with #x-number of classes in the subject matter of the arrest or at least an English class as by equal rights to foreigners here and for those earning their G.E.D.'s, of Ed wrote to me that he applied for such but was: DENIED! of yours and my tax-payer money going to these teachers who are supposed to teach, but who remain back at the administrator's office shuffling papers behind a desk while they stare at the clock on the wall until getting their paycheck every Friday.  Of cutting a check to the Municipality of Marion, Illinois for to pay for Uncle Sam's donation of excrement to the local sewage lagoon.  Or don't they pay this too?  Here in N.H. there used to be a payment in lieu of property taxes agreement, but that was decades ago expired so said the Concord, N.H. City Solicitor Paul Cavanaugh to me of WHERE is it? I'd like to see that and the $2 million a year property taxes they owe when finally charged by the assessor by RSA Ch. 123:2   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-2.htm from:  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm but them chicken- shit so as not to rock the Federal Funds Boat that shows up at the G&C  http://www.nh.gov/council/ Office every other Wednesday morning! of them getting a copy of this too. Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[DonnaVanMeter]

June 7th, 2007 the Federal Government made an attempt on the life of an innocent unarmed man as he stood in solidarity with an elderly couple whom questioned the legalities of the Federal Income Tax. 5 years of strife, struggle and sacrifice he sits behind prison walls for utilizing his voice for Ed and Elaine Brown. Daniel Riley now needs your help as he is in financial straits due to recently being fired from his job/enslavement there at the FCI in Terre Haute Indiana. If you can spare a few dollars to help a man whom has lost a great deal including his freedom, he will greatly appreciate it.
Thank you!

All contributions can be made to:
Federal Bureau of Prison "LockBox"
Daniel Riley
14528-052
PO Box 474701
Des Moines, IA 50947-0001

Or you can use Western Union.

https://www.inmateservices.westernunion.com/WUCOMWEB/staticMid.do?pagename=inmateHome&method=load&countryCode=US&languageCode=en&nextSecurePage=Y

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a relay of what was just e-mailed to The N.H. Secretary of State and others at 2:08 p.m. this afternoon:

"To: N.H. Secretary of State

Here's an update that you "may" add to the file of my case #_____ of Haas v. William Gardner to be heard when? Thursday, June 14th @ __:__ o'clock p.m.? in Room #_____ of the L.O.B.? (Legislative Office Building), Concord, New Hampshire.

- - Joe

cc: the priors too.

RE: http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/statenewengland/963593-227/redistricting-could-cost-nashua-one-representative-scramble.html * (see copy and paste below)

"Thank you David Brooks, Staff Writer for The "Nashua Telegraph"for the math here of: (1) "Each of the 400 state representatives in New Hampshire should represent about 3,300 people" and; (2) "(New Hampshire had 1.32 million residents in the 2010 census)" with "U.S. Congress No change. " of two districts.  But that you fail to detail out this N.H. Supreme Court court case and the already filed case to the B.L.C. Ballot Law Commission out of the Secretary of State's Office. In the former there are four State Reps. being eliminated as the 1% amount and so 1 per each of 100 x 4 = the 400 by Article XIV, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution since we do not elect our judges here; and reference the latter, of your associate Kevin Landrigan of your Concord office having both the electronic and paper filing in the BLC case presented to Bill Gardner's Office yesterday afternoon, for a hearing hopefully by the middle of next week of before the end of the week filing day and time ends in that we're supposed to have 44 Federal Congressional districts as the ratio is supposed to be up to 300,000 per Federal Rep. by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution.  Of it being policy or by custom and practice by Federal law of Public Law 62-5 of 1911 but since when can Congress amend the Constitution?  It can't.  And neither are we Article 12 "inhabitants" and Article 30 citizens (parts 1+2 respectfully) in N.H. supposed to be controlled over by these "other laws" of Congress withOUT our 1-8-17 U.S. "Consent" ! Of for over two centuries nobody has protested since our Federal Reps have been accountable to us at the higher ratio of O.K. in quality with us in the past, but that I've put my foot down, and ink to paper in protest, as the current crop is a bit too arrogant, (like Frank Guinta saying that he'll put together a Blue Ribbon Panel, but when? AFTER the next election?) and if anybody else would like to run for Congress too, that since the State Reps have FAILed to re-district according to THE law, that we be allowed to "carve" out our own districts, and so to like they say: let the chips fall where they may. "