They will do just about anything ... won't they.
Government employees are the enemy.
I agree that any "government" that isn't 100 percent voluntary is the enemy. I do think, however, that the majority of "government" employees would do something else if they had the opportunity. Not saying they can't just "quit" their "jobs" but the majority of them have a hard time walking away from good pay, good benefits, job security, and * * * * * pension plans * * * * * (all at the expense of the rest of us). We need to continue to work on a good "model" here in New Hampshire to facilitate a peaceful transition(hey I can hope!).
And just in case anyone reading this isn't familiar with the Stanford Prison Experiment here is a link to the website (http://www.prisonexp.org/).
It's important to keep in mind the results of this experiment and, sadly, human nature...
P.C.:
--I've highlighted your * * * * * pension plans * * * * * part of your paragraph, and suggest that for New Hampshire, you read: Article 36, Part the First, N.H. Constitution & Bill of Rights. "Ecomony being a most essential virtue in all states, especially in a young one, NO pension SHALL be granted, but in consideration of actual services; and such pensions ought to be granted with great caution, by the legislature, and NEVER for more than one year at a time." June 2, 1784. (emphasis ADDed) To my knowledge there as NEVER been any such grants of individual pensions by the legislature in this or last century! that is required by "one year at a time." I think that they think this only applies to a YOUNG state and not now in its MIDDLE or OLD age? There being many retired public (non- or mal)servants who did WRONG during their time, and now needing to face the music! The music of the General Court being a good or bad tone upon them in their yea or nay votes on each and every one, and not as a group, especially when an Art. 32 Petition is against certain pentioners as collecting from a non-vote to begin with, but the statute of limitations going back only three (3) years. Hey! Before the judges were added to the state-wide system in 200_ they were being paid for RSA Ch. _______ services rendered and "to be" rendered as the excuse they gave when I took the then State Treasurer, Michael Ablowich to Merrimack County Superior Court case #___ , and then found out that one Supreme: Maurice Bois was an Alzheimer's patient at a Manchester Home and being paid for "stand-by alert" to return to the bench past the age: 70 years limit in Art. 78, the Supremes declaring by their "opinion" that a temporary seat on the so-called "bench" was not an "office" and so them exempt from Article 78 Disqualification by Age.
http://www.state.nh.us --There's an Article 32 Petition signed by me and properly endorsed with (two former Reps, but who were Reps at the time of signing: Henry McElroy from Nashua, and Dick Marple, see below plus) Rep. Lars Christiansen's signature and District number from Hudson as by House Rule #36, with three amendments dealing with this Art. 36, but that the House Speaker, [Terie Norelli (d), Rockingham District 16, Seat #6001, 35 Middle Rd., Portsmouth, N.H. 03801-4802, 603: 436-9169, office: 271-3661
terie.norelli@leg.state.nh.us ]
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house refuses to process it by House Rule #4 over to the "appropriate committee"
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/abouthouse/houserules.htm and so for me to likewise charge her with RSA Ch. 643:1 "Official Oppression"
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/643/643-1.htm too, as I did against former House Speaker, Doug Scamman, with my complaint to the Attorney General's Office falling of deaf ears! The A.G.'s Office way overdue in getting back to me within the 120 days as by section II of:
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LV/541-A/541-A-29.htm for RSA Ch. 541-A:29,II.
--My theory I have yet to prove is that "they"/ WHOever I complain against and to/ for action are ALL "on the take", from this $5 billion account, that's the letter "b" as in boy, not m as in million, because if they can get away with envelopes of greenbacks floating around the chamber of the Senate during key votes, that I've testified to before the House Judiciary Committee I think it was a few years ago, as eye-witnessed by former State Rep. Dick Marple of Hooksett, who finds this practice disgusting, and will tell ANYone of what he saw (and WHO took it?), then they can get away with "murder"! as in to shoot Ed Brown to shut him up for good for multi-billions of dollars at the national level! So Ed: keep up the good work.
--And speaking of "extortion", that's what the Supremes have just written into my Appeal # 2206-0783 last Friday, May 11th in that I would have had my questions answered by them for an Art. 14 "complete" and Art. 8 "account"ing but for the lack of the lower court papers out of the file, and this under what's supposed to be a "Unified Court System"! Unified alright, unified of THEM v.s. US, me calling Clerk Rbt. B. Muh at the Grafton County Superior Court in North Haverhill, N.H. 03774 at 787-6961 on Tuesday morning and his reply to me of Thu., May 17th @ 2:45 p.m. to get in my MOTION TO RECONSIDER (within 10 days and so by Mon., May 21st) as having the two (of three files) on this "Champerty" bullshit sent to the Supreme Court at a cost of 50-cents per page by Rule #__ (when Merrimack County Superior Court in Concord only charges 15-cents per page) = $617.50 (that would have been 1/3rd that = about $200+ plus that other "Criminal" file #92-S-562 to get that cost later; __).
Yours truly, - - Joe Haas
pc: (1) House Speaker Norelli, (2) The Attorney General's Office, (3) The Supremes.
P.S. To call Norelli again at her house phone # to leave yet another message that SHE is the one to make the decisions, and NOT her legal counsel who LIED in his letter to me earlier this month that my Article 32 Petition was not filed in time. Hey! I filed it BEFORE-time under Doug Scamman's mal-administration as House Speaker, and with the Amendments added thereto about 2 minutes BEFORE the Dec. __ 2006 deadline at the Room #__ Legislative Services, 1st floor State House & Capitol Bldg., #__ North Main Street, Attn: Jill who said that she'd process it, but when I contacted here after #__ amount of time, she said it was there to collect dust!
* And so now can you see WHY Ed has given up on the "system"? It IS, or almost time for an Art. 10** Revolution! The ends of government are perverted, and the means of redress are ineffectual, there needing just the second element to be complete if not already: "public liberty manifestly endangered". Liberty defined as: "2. Freedom from confinement or SERVITUDE" (emphasis ADDed because by the Thirteenth Amendment: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction" my Dad once writing to then legal counsel Stephen E. Merrill for Gov. John H. Sununu that your son by contempt has been sentenced by judge, but not convicted by jury, and so not eligible for a pardon, since found out to be WRONG! as by the case law in my prior applications, and now getting to the gray area of yes: a jury trial but with evidence withheld by the judge! as in Ed's case) "1a. The condition of being free from restriction or control" and 1."b. The right to act as one chooses" From "THE AMERICAN ENGLISH DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE" (c)1973 @ page 406. Thus to see what happens in Reps Hall Monday morning, May 21st on the MANDATORY Seat Belt Law proposed by HB #___ to be put on the books and enforced by LAW ENFORCEMENT Officers / the State Police, actually-turned Revenue Agents of the State, the fact being that a third of the force quite in the 1960s when they were told to not enforce the law/ meaning the Constitution, but the statutes placed on the books by the politicians! Dick Marple one of those Troopers who quit.
** Article 10, N.H. Const., Pt. 1 & Bill of Rights: So when these three elements are done, as in WELL done in my opinion, as NOW! then "the people MAY, and of right OUGHT to reform the old, or establish a NEW government. [The government of Home Rule, or A Man's Home is his Castle, and if he sets foot outside the walls or boundaries and is attempted at being gunned down by federalies on state turf withOUT permission, then so be it for to re-pulse against the wrongful pulsers: the governor will be "responsible" for any and all deaths as by his Art. 41+51 powers for his failure and refusal to act, my complaint to the Personnel Office to halt his salary for non-performance of duty, yet to be acted upon, see my Reply #__ above). (emphasis ADDed). And continued with the reason for establising a new government not of a Democracy or mob-rule by majority, in what is supposed to be an Art. IV, Section 4, U.S. Constitutional Republic as guaranteed to us by the rule of law, rather than the rule of men (arbitrary actions), which has turned into not an oligarchy, but a dulocracy (that word USED to be/ past tense, in BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY) and is defined as when the servant (as in the "public" servant) so domineers over the master that he rules with an iron fist. An Iron fist as in needing some REAL Dominations (now look up that word for the heirarchy of angels) and fire from the blacksmith's shop, in the meantime to be wary of missiles projected from said shop when the goons step closer with their Big Brother face ready for some bullets alright. Bullets to their brains to be splattered on the pavement they walk since they fail to carry the tipstaff for which to aim at, instead replacing such with their mouth, getting one right in there, to the cranal cavity and give them a lesson they will soon forget! Mashed brains for their family supper! in that: "The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind."
