Won't one of them tell the leach to back off ?
Nope. All four are using court appointed lawyers(*) paid for by US taxpayers. Considering that they're looking at anywhere between five years (for Wolffe), 21 years (for Riley and Gonzalez) and over a 100 years (for Gerhard) in prison, I don't really blame them.
I only find such hypocrisy mildly annoying compared to the fact that Mrs. Wolffe was an employee of the federal government during all this mess. Cashing government paychecks while trashing the government is just ugly, and keeping a 62 page manual on how to murder federal government employees on her work computer is just mind-numbingly stupid.
(*) The Arraignment for Jason was called by loud speaker at just before the 11:00 a.m. appointed time, they call the "list" lumping all defendants together no matter what types of charges, but some pornographer from Gilford was also on for 11:00 a.m. and so unless you sat there listening to all that garbage, none of the bailiff's would alert us waiting in the hallway, and so we missed whatever happened in Jason's case, but not to complain as it was the same old, same old. My verbal comment into the "suggestion" window to the deputy Clerk, Mr. Lynch was that maybe a different alert could be implemented for the future. He said that he'd pass this recommendation up to Clerk Js. R. Starr, who is on vacation this week, but kind of doubted anything would be done, as "usually" the defendant would have friends +/or relatives exiting the courtroom, sometimes with reporters there just for "that" case, informally announcing in effect that the next hearing was starting, but that he said although you might think the baliff's are sitting around doing nothing, that they are there for security IN the courtroom, and to step foot out through the door might allow for a hostile take-over of the courtroom. Imagine that ever happening!
Anyways, after my visit to see the Deputy Clerk, I noticed the reporters getting the verbal strategy notes from the defense attorney who said that the reason for waiving these detention hearings "without prejudice" is that they do so that if there be more evidence/testimony in the future for their defense, then they don't completely give up the right for a bail hearing from the start, but can keep it in reserves to use later. And that in Jason's case of buying so many guns on different days, each day as a seperate offense, the potential time escalates like up to five (5) years for the first offense, up to ten (10) years for the second offense, etc.
[even though there be one goal, of like supplying the needed firepower to the Art. 10 Revolutionaries to offset a "militant" federal government with reactionaries that is using force as their evidence*. Ed having had the evidence in his 2005 certificate from the N.H. Secretary of State that McAuliffee refused to mark as an Exhibit #___ for the jury to deliberate on for their verduct and so to declare a mistrial, especialy AFTER Danny wins his Petition for an Habeas Corpus with a MAss.achusetts judge.]
I commented to him/the defense attorney, that some federal judges in New York think that these mandatory minimum sentences imposed upon them to be that they "shall" or "must" apply the minimum time by Congress are unconstitutional, and he said something but never inferred that Barbadoro is in that same judicial boat as his brothers of the bar in New York state. I was going to say something else, but he had to go. What I was going to say was the former House Criminal Justice Chairman/ Republican David Welch of Kingston, N.H. here in the State Legislature commented on this 3-charge bullshit for one offense that can be there for if the judge thinks the defendant found guilty needs to be taught a lesson like on misdemeanor crimes of simple assault, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct, for ONE offense/incident/ event, then the judge can, in effect, give the criminal-found-guilty the max per misdemeanor of one year x 3 = three years that is two years MORE than even the sentence of the minimum felony charge of one year and a day at the State Prison.
This is physcological warfare from our Congressmen and I don't like it! It should be per incident max to one year for one offense, at the state level, similarly dealt with on this one goal stuff at the federal level, and I'd like to see some Congressman put in a House Bill #_____ for this this Fall for 2008 Legislation. cc: Shea-Porter and Hodes, plus Gregg and Sununu. My drop-off of a copy of this to both Hodes and Gregg at their Concord offices on Main Street by me later this afternoon, with feedback please of your comments on this Federal Rep. and Senator.
The T.V. screen had Jason down for 11:00 a.m. and Margo told me afterwards that his "Detention hearing" is scheduled for next Tuesday morning at 9:30 a.m.
This afternoon Reno has his "Arraignment" at 3:30 p.m. for what's expected to be the same as the other three? or are we going to see some aggressivness against a court that is against the law? The judge will, of course, make the plea of not guilty FOR the defendant, but where are the objections by either the defendant or his attorney? There are none from the latter because they do not want to upset the apple cart from where they are paid to be fed. Fed as in feeding at the Federal trough, but it is a polluted trough! No jurisdiction by N.H. RSA 123:1 from 1-8-17, U.S. Const. in that the Feds were offered "concurrent jurisdiction" on Flag Day, June 14th, 1883 by the N.H. General Court, but they REFUSED! wanting "exclusive jurisdiction" for criminal cases, but in actuality having NO jurisdiction. To find out WHERE these last two defendants are going to be incarcerated, there being no relatives of Jason here today in court today to tell us where he came from, or is going, like Bill for Danny yesterday; and to see if there be some relatives for Reno this afternoon.
Plus there's been an elderly couple attending all these hearings, the man in the white beard looking like Santa Claus, and when I made some comment to them in the hall, the wife said something, but the husband wanting to remain ingognito, and continuing walking out the door, them I think expecting something more of like what we'd have seen in the courtrooms of the 1980s if Andy Melechinsky was still around, up from Enfield, Connecticut to us hicks-in-the-sticks, him, R.I.P. against the I.R.S. who would go limp in the courtroom and have to be in a chair on wheels, them having to elevate his feet up to another one and wheel him out.
Plus, for a summary here of case files, to read later, like any transport orders to wherever being:
1.) Robert Wolffe Cr. No. 07-190-01-PB
2.) Daniel Riley, Cr. No. 07-189-01-SM
3.) Jason Gerhard, Cr. No. 07-168-01-PB
4.) Cirino Gonzales, Cr. No. 07-191-01-SM
Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059
pc: Gov. John H. Lynch too, per his Art. 41 duties he is neglecting, and is "responsible" for, the clock ticking of $damages for every day each of these four (4) defendants are unlawfully and illegally incarcerated because he has NOT done his job of to make sure that all "legislative mandates" by the shall word in RSA Ch. 123:1 is complied with by the Feds! "Wise up" or puke your stomack out tonight after dinner! you bastard! Time for you to go on sick leave, because you are "sick"! Yeah, that's an idea, to see give a copy of this to the State House nurse to look into his physical well-being to see of some symptom that might be affecting his brain, and get a copy of her diagnosis.
