Linked Events

  • Ed brown in court: September 26, 2006
  • ed brown trial all week?: January 04, 2007
  • Ed brown trial all week?: January 12, 2007
  • Ed Brown protest: January 16, 2007
  • ed brown trial: January 16, 2007
  • Brown's Sentencing Hearing: April 24, 2007
  • BBQ at the Browns: July 04, 2007
  • Concert in support of Browns: July 14, 2007
  • Brown Supporters in Court: September 20, 2007
  • Danny Riley in court 11:30 am: October 28, 2008
  • Ed and Elaine Brown Trial: June 29, 2009
  • Elaine sentencing: October 02, 2009
  • Ed Brown Sentencing: January 11, 2010

Author Topic: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS  (Read 433039 times)

JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6930 on: January 24, 2008, 10:43 AM NHFT »
So when are the subpoenas going to be dished out? Right before the trial?

Check this out: http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm

Rule 45(b) for Service, in section (1) reads that "Serving a subpoena requires delivering a copy to the named person and, if the subpoena requires that person's attendance, tendering the fees for 1 day's attendance and the mileage allowed by law."

I did just call the court in Concord @ 225-1423 and asked what the "1 day" rate is, plus mileage allowance, and she said: "forty bucks" and 48.5 cents respectfully.  But people: do not take slang! It's not 40 bucks, but 40 dollars.  And so dollars of what? A dollar is a unit of measurement, like gallons.  So like gallons of gasoline or water?, dollars of what? gold or silver coin?  >:D

Read what the court must comply with.  "They" must obey the law too, because if not, then to require us to comply with all laws, while they comply only with some, is hypocrisy! It's spelled out in Section 20 of the Coinage Act of 1792 that is still the law! Go to http://www.google.com to find your own version of this document and read what Section 20 says: "...and that all accounts in the public offices and all proceedings in the courts of the United States shall be kept and had in conformity to this regulation." http://landru.i-link-2.net/monques/coinageact.html

"They" do not want you to rock the boat!  So rock the boat I did ask at an IRS auction at the Norris Cotton Federal Building in Manchester, N.H. a few years ago for a good friend of mine: Andy Tempelman of Milford where at the government event I did hear that the auction would start at something like 150,000 (one hundred and fifty thousand) the auctioneer said. So I asked: 150,000 of what?  Answer: Dollars.  My 2nd question: dollars of what?  And then I was arrested for disorderly conduct, my hands folded behind my back, and shackled into handcuffs, and escorted down the elevator to the dungeon and given a ticket of a $50.00 fine, that if I wanted to contest such I could petition the U.S. District Court.  A what? I asked.  Where are their papers?  The N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 papers that are supposed to be on file as from 1-8-17 U.S. Constitution.  WHY would I want to go to an unlawful and illegal judge in an unlawful and illegal courthouse? I did nothing, and so nothing happened.  Is the $50.00 not due now because they stole the $50.00 bill I sent to Ed for legal counsel AFTER the four Freedom Keepers were arrested on Sept. 12th, but BEFORE Ed & Elaine were captured on October 4th and consider it paid!?

I am a Title 18, Part II, Chapter 237, Section 3771 Crime victim, see http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/3771.html Are any or all of the four or now three defendants going to counter or cross claim in this case? Wasn't the mail tampered with?  Bob is the "expert" on this as having worked for the Post Office.  Now that he has supposedly joined the Dark Side  >:D can he now be called as an expert witness?  ;D WHO of the Freedom Four sent letters to Ed & Elaine but which mail was intercepted? We ought to get from Bob, the list of all names of people who sent Ed & Elaine mail through him, and narrow it down to those taking his services offered because they are victims.  ;) Victims have the right to "the fullest attendance possible" by section (b) and cannot be denied except by section (a)(3) "unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding". Danny: can you work on this angle of the case?

But back to my friend Andy, and his wife Priscilla plus their son.  The auction in Manchester was canceled, and a new one was scheduled on the property, but because of some talk of Ed being in the woods there with his militia, it was transferred, at the last few minutes, to the Milford Town Hall, and a new policy put into effect that only bidders with a $5,000 deposit could bid or ask questions. Andy said there that there be no need to rock the boat this time because he had everything under control...or so he thought.  Because when he filed a Motion into the court to void the sale because it was NOT conducted either on the property or in a courthouse in the county of where the land was located, by Title #__ U.S. Code Section _______ the Judge Paul Barbadoro said in effect: I don't give a shit: the end justifies the means, I'm a sociopath, to hell with procedural due process, the appointing power likes what I'm doing, and the Congressional goons who confirmed me in the Senate like it too because they know that there are wimps in the House of Representatives who are too afraid or chicken-shit to impeach me, and BTW I have my "brothers" of the bar over there to protect me.  >:( This information was given over to Deputy Marshal Gary DiMartino who was there and still is, but him saying in effect: I don't give a shit either! You can go homeless as far as I'm concerned, might over right is our motto, and if you don't like it, then to wait until the next election four (4) years down the road, in the meantime visit the soup kitchen, food pantry and get your clothes and tent plus sleeping bag at your nearest Good Will Center.  >:(

So people:  now is the time to organize a concerted counter-attack to the very lawful and legal way the court is supposed to be operating as.  Or in other words as an analogy: How can an octopus stretch out its arms if the food it eats is corrupted!? A note is an evidence of a debt.  The Federal Reserve System* is a misnomer.  It is not federal, nor does it have a reserve.  For every note monetized, that is: after the Crane Paper Company in Dalton, MAss. sells its product to the Bureau of Engraving & Printing to print the notes by contract with the Fed* and delivers it to them, only until after it leaves the Fed* to its member banks in-state, is the note monetized.  If the truck is robbed on its way from the Bureau to the Fed, all that's stolen is personal property.  The serial numbers have not been recorded yet.  They are recorded when they are sent OUT from the Fed, not into it. At that time, by Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act, so much gold bullion is supposed to be placed on deposit with the U.S. Mint.  I've asked for this accounting under F.O.I.A., and they've told me to get lost.  Which Presidential candidate(s) promise to audit the Mint once elected President? We are owed these dollars by Title 12 U.S. Code Sec. 411 for them to be  redeemed and in the quality per quantity at par value.  Take nothing less.  When they tender debased coins: Just say no!  :icon_pirat:

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

P.S. WHO are these potential jurors who refused to attend the court, and why?  Do they know that the court is illegal? They are the ones who these Freedom Four (now down to three?) want on their panel.  But the gov't does not want them.  So what to do?  Ask how much they got paid up front from the government, and if in the lawful manner.  :icon_farao: Only law-abiding jurors should be qualified to sit, and that includes those who consume only lawful dollars.


JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6931 on: January 24, 2008, 12:44 PM NHFT »
New Hampshire takes hints from PACER.

See http://nhpoliticalaction.com/index.php?action=profile;u=26;sa=showPosts [Reply #5 of 5 on page one of Dec. 4 '07 @ 11:45:10 AM. ]

A.)1.) House Bill 1359 "relative to fees for public records" on for a Public Hearing today @ 3:00 p.m. in the House Judiciary Committee, Rooms 206-208 LOB in Concord, combined for the 7-cents per copy cost, but no such fee for viewing like from the internet, that PACER charges.

Notice B.)2.) too for HB 1472 Workforce Housing on for 2:00 p.m. in the Municipal & County Gov't Room 301 LOB about RSA 674:59 for lot size; and B.)4.) about Rangeways was in Municipal @ 10:30 a.m. this morning.

Updates to the others, to follow...

JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6932 on: January 24, 2008, 01:54 PM NHFT »
New Hampshire takes hints from PACER.

See http://nhpoliticalaction.com/index.php?action=profile;u=26;sa=showPosts [Reply #5 of 5 on page one of Dec. 4 '07 @ 11:45:10 AM. ]

A.)1.) House Bill 1359 "relative to fees for public records" on for a Public Hearing today @ 3:00 p.m. in the House Judiciary Committee, Rooms 206-208 LOB in Concord, combined for the 7-cents per copy cost, but no such fee for viewing like from the internet, that PACER charges.

Notice B.)2.) too for HB 1472 Workforce Housing on for 2:00 p.m. in the Municipal & County Gov't Room 301 LOB about RSA 674:59 for lot size; and B.)4.) about Rangeways was in Municipal @ 10:30 a.m. this morning.

Updates to the others, to follow...



Update #1 of ___.

A.)2.) Judiciary hearing on CACR30 of Oaths was held 1/15 @ 11 AM Judiciary; A.)4.) Criminal Justice hearing on HB1233 Habeas Corpus was held 1/10 @ 9:30 am, re: A.G. to get involved when denied within U.S., but not when restored. Plus: in reference to A.)3.) for HB 1543 Citizen's Petition, that's going to be in Judiciary on 2/5,Tue. @ 2 PM ____________   see http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2008/HB1543.html so as they say: be there, or be square.

I.) I'm interested in this very much, because I've filed these Art. 32 Petitions with the House Speakers: Donna Syteck, Gene Chandler, Doug Scamman and Terri Norelli, and that here's what's happened: Syteck referred it over to then House Rep. Peter Hoe Burling* for a Special Bill but that went nowhere, Chandler, after I took him to the Ethics Committee finally red-penciled my petition to say that Dover Rep. Roland Hemon put down his seat # by mistake, when it was supposed to be his district # by House Rule 36, so corrected with Reps. McElroy, Christiansen + Marple to Scamman, but that he said it was "not appropriate", or in other words, on advice of counsel: he had the power to be dictator to say that not ALL, but only SOME petitions make it over to the "appropriate" committee by House Rule #4. And then Norelli said that when I re-entered the petition during her current term, that it had to be personally delivered by the Rep. to Legislative Services!  not me.

So now finally, the METHODOLOGY of "this bill establishes a procedure" thank you "very" much  Reps., Itse, Ingbretson, Villeneuve, Dumaine and Hopfgarten.

The wording in paragraph III.(a) might be changed to reflect what's already written into RSA Ch. 528:18 in that of to "the treasurer, assistant-treasurer or cashier of the corporation" http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LIV/528/528-18.htm under "Levy of Execution on personal property" as opposed to real estate under RSA Ch. 529:1-35.

In my Appeal #________ at the N.H. Supreme Court of Brian J. Shedd v. Haas & Cathedral Corporation, from 94-E-035 in Grafton County Superior Court (Mrs. Peter Hoe/ Jean K. Burling*, the judge, & BTW he's Ed's state Senator now), there's the case citation of: When the judge (Js.D.O'Neill,III) changes the position of the parties in a preliminary injunction (me from a landlord into a tenant, in this crooked Sheriff's Sale), that it makes the court a party to extortion!" but with this cover-up by their buddies of the bar. Or in other words: a thief in the 2nd degree.  And what does a thief pay?  Sevenfold the $amount stolen, by the formula as found in Proverbs 6:30-31 in the Bible, from Blackstone's Commentaries, from a N.H. court case, from another court case of State v. Fleming, Vol. __, N.H. Reports ___ (197_) in RSA Ch. 651:63 for Restitution. Thus the principal plus interest, or real estate plus rents! both!!

My case involving "Champerty" finder's fee contracts for heirs to land and mineral rights as a Bounty Hunter [operating under "free commercial speech" as per the Vol. 400 MAss. Reports, __ Beineke case, footnote #7, (1987) but not given equal rights in the crooked federal courts too, see also for Bill Devine, Bounter Hunter in The "Boston Herald" of Sept. 24, 1989 @ page 16 (or 16-24) who spent over $1/4 million legal fees to assert these rights on Nantucket Island] , which common law offense was taken off the books in the Spring of 1992, but me charged nevertheless in Fall 1992-S-562 and spent 100 days in jail** for this non-offense! And after a non-jury trial that is also against the law in the Seventh Amendment (John P. Arnold in cahoots, too as the judge on this case, the former N.H. Attorney General) And this same House Judiciary Committee last year 2007 in HB #____ said that the common law is being adequately administered in the court system, to which I reply: bullshit!

I intend to make my petitions #1 + 2** to be THE very first ones every processed in this 21st century! #1: of a $_____________ claim against the General Fund for the theft of my building plus rents, especially since "they" will not hold that Art. 36 annual hearing on the retired judge Peter W. Smith, who charged me with this Champerty non-offense/ contempt-of-court, (and before that of Rbt. E.K. Morrill, soon to retire) to try to get a Writ of Elegit against a half of his pension, that's 100% more than what they left me out into the streets as a homeless person! The Sheriff having never delivered that levy to my corporate Clerk Dick Townsend of Barrington, N.H. now 90 years old and still awaiting it this almost 12.5 years later from Nov. 1995!

**The second petition being my claim of: $2,500 for every day of the one hundred (100) days spent behind bars unlawfully.

II.) The same goes for Ed & Elaine: WHERE was their Art. 12 protection? from the outlaw Feds!? They should be the second ones to file such a petition.

Yours truly, - Joe Haas

DonnaVanMeter

  • Contrary
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 28
  • Posts: 215
  • Karma: 249
    • View Profile
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6933 on: January 24, 2008, 05:32 PM NHFT »
got this from Reno, he asked me to post it to his myspace, thought i would save ya guys the work and paste it here too.

there was some abuse going on over there in Merrimack, which in a different occasion over policy an inmate was beaten by COs, and the last i heard about that, the guy had his head fractured during an incident. Im not sure if that particular inmate has been moved, or if there is an investigation started or filed.

Donna VanMeter
 
oh sorry about the handwriting, it isnt the clearest, ( and this is pretty good compared to how he writes normally lol!)


<a href=http://www.lunapic.com/editor/ alt="Free Online Photo Editor"><img src="http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3862/48346060gi5.jpg"></a>





<a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=48346060gi5.jpg><img src=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3862/48346060gi5.th.jpg></a>


http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3862/48346060gi5.jpg
« Last Edit: January 24, 2008, 05:35 PM NHFT by DonnaVanMeter »
"There is no waste of time in life like that of making explanations." - D'Israeli

JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6934 on: January 25, 2008, 07:23 AM NHFT »
got this from Reno, he asked me to post it to his myspace, thought i would save ya guys the work and paste it here too.

there was some abuse going on over there in Merrimack, which in a different occasion over policy an inmate was beaten by COs, and the last i heard about that, the guy had his head fractured during an incident. Im not sure if that particular inmate has been moved, or if there is an investigation started or filed.

Donna VanMeter
 
oh sorry about the handwriting, it isnt the clearest, ( and this is pretty good compared to how he writes normally lol!)



Thanks Donna.  And so the bottom line is that "they" don't want the inmates there to read ANY books, nor be reminded of their family and friends by refusing the glue sticks for the pictures to place on the wall.

What a difference #__ miles makes between there and at the Strafford County Jail in Dover that used to (past tense), have on their http://www.co.strafford.nh.us/jail/ website that they're looking for paperback western books to update their library.

I've taken in numerous paperback books of various subjects, donating them at the front desk on my way to visit both Danny and Jason, and the Social Receptionist woman there says thank you, as she provides coffee to the guests with toys for their children to play with too.

It sounds like the Merrimack County Jail has gone to what may be referred to not as National Socialism termed Nazi, but localized socialism termed what? The order of the Provincial? Provincialism?  Check it out over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Localism and so to "them" C.O.'s there it's not: "Think global, act local", but "Think local, act local", and just that: don't read and think, but just think.

They're even worse than the Nazi's. At least the Nazi's left you some reading material that they thought you ought to read according to their agenda: http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005852 Notice the May 10th BOOK BURNING Day. 

So if no book cart, or book case, then empty space? What did "they" do with the books and/or case?  Is it getting dusted off, shellacked or painted?  And does it really take that much time? WHO is the Superintendent there? To see him [Ron White] at the next (?) County Commissioner's Meeting on: Thu., Jan. 31st (?) * and give them a piece of my mind from a book I've read:  it's called The Constitutions of the United States and state of New Hampshire, and is printed by the Office of Secretary of State, and by RSA Ch. _____ is distributed to every school in the state, but as Fred Davideit of Hillsbourough found out on a Jail4Judges search of his town, they landed in the janitor's closet!

So to find out from WHERE these C.O.'s went to school, might explain a few things.

Yours truly, - - Joe

* nothing scheduled, as of today, according to Melinda, the receptionist who I did just talk with at 228-0331, see the http://www.ci.concord.nh.us/govmnt/county/concordv2.asp?siteindx=Z20,09 for their address of: 4 Court Street, Concord, N.H. 03301, and the aerial view of the jail at http://www.merrimackcounty.net/ She referred me over to Kathy Bates, the Office Secretary who said that they/ the inmates are well supplied with books and computers.  I said yeah, and so off-limits to those to whom disciplinary charges have been brought against, but for how long?  It seems Reno has been denied this for #___ months now!? Or is this the old complaint, or a new complaint?  And his side of the story, so WHEN if ever was their a disciplinary hearing against either the guard/ C.O. (Correctional Officer), by the Superintendent or his Deputy, etc.? As you know there are two sides of every story, and all we get is this from Reno through you, Donna.  So are you telling us that there was NO hearing (or one scheduled for: _______?) and they leave it at that!? If that's the case, then "they" are sociopaths too for saying the end justifies the means, and so the Super. in need of some medial attention.  >:D

coffeeseven

  • Rebel
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1223
  • Karma: 702
  • Oh bother said the Borg. We've assimilated Pooh.
    • View Profile
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6935 on: January 25, 2008, 07:32 AM NHFT »
Joyce read a very touching letter from Ed on The Power Hour this morning. It was about 30 minutes + - into the show. There is a rebroadcast tonight at 9 pm central. http://www.thepowerhour.com or http://www.gcnlive.com.


JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6936 on: January 25, 2008, 07:48 AM NHFT »
Joyce read a very touching letter from Ed on The Power Hour this morning. It was about 30 minutes + - into the show. There is a rebroadcast tonight at 9 pm central. http://www.thepowerhour.com or http://www.gcnlive.com.



Would you believe: that two* former C.O.'s at the Merrimack County Jail are heading down to see Ed in New Jersey, because they lost their "pepper spray" duty as by policy interruption by the Grand Jury? and that they've been trained at the Rhode Island F.C.I.?   >:D

http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080119/NEWS01/801190370

* Barry Lee, 41 of Tilton, and Salvatore Mills, 44 of Gilmanton; see Indictments #__________ + _____________ over at the Merrimack County Superior Court.

- - Joe

P.S. Is this an "on-going" policy?  like the book case case? And what of this "policy"?  Is it a written or verbal policy? Training in use of pepper spray at all opportunities? You follow our orders or else get peppered! In the old days in Grafton County, it was discipline by firing squad.  Firing of the water hose that is.  8) into the cell, the inmate pushed back up against the wall.


DonnaVanMeter

  • Contrary
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 28
  • Posts: 215
  • Karma: 249
    • View Profile
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6937 on: January 25, 2008, 04:36 PM NHFT »
Reno called this afternoon, he was informed that there was a motion filed that denied him bond hearing that was agreed upon with David Bownes and the court at the last pretrial hearing. David is filing again, fighting for another bond hearing sometime next week.
He said that more of his discovery was released to him. He was on lockdown throughout the day so he couldnt let me know any earlier.

thank you
donna





he also mentioned he hasnt recieved any mail for 3 days now. Normally he recieves 2-3 pieces a day.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2008, 04:40 PM NHFT by DonnaVanMeter »
"There is no waste of time in life like that of making explanations." - D'Israeli

DonnaVanMeter

  • Contrary
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 28
  • Posts: 215
  • Karma: 249
    • View Profile
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6938 on: January 25, 2008, 10:26 PM NHFT »
got this from Reno, he asked me to post it to his myspace, thought i would save ya guys the work and paste it here too.

there was some abuse going on over there in Merrimack, which in a different occasion over policy an inmate was beaten by COs, and the last i heard about that, the guy had his head fractured during an incident. Im not sure if that particular inmate has been moved, or if there is an investigation started or filed.

Donna VanMeter
 
oh sorry about the handwriting, it isnt the clearest, ( and this is pretty good compared to how he writes normally lol!)


<a href=http://www.lunapic.com/editor/ alt="Free Online Photo Editor"><img src="http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3862/48346060gi5.jpg"></a>





<a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=48346060gi5.jpg><img src=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3862/48346060gi5.th.jpg></a>


http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3862/48346060gi5.jpg





thank you to Maria from Tx. Friend of Renos for typing this up for all of us!


THE ENTIRE BLOCK WAS UPSET WITH C/O LEWKO FOR HIS CONSTANT DISRESPECT TO WE, THE INMATES. WHEN C/O ASH REPRIMANDED US, WE CALMLY EXPLAINED TO C/O ASH (CALMLY BECAUSE “WE” WERE NOT UPSET WITH HER) THAT C/O LEWKO REMOVED ALL THE BOOKS FROM OUR SMALL BOOKCASE. C/O ASH REPLIED, “THAT WAS C/O PIERCE DOING.” WHILE I CONTINUED TO EXPLAIN THAT THE “GO KILL YOURSELF” WAS A REMARK C/O LEWKO YELLS AT US INMATES, AMONG OTHER INSULTS & GESTURES. HIS (C/O LEWKE) BEHAVIOR HAS BEEN REPORTED NUMEROUS TIMES TO NO EFFECT ON “OUR” END! FUNNY, WHEN C/O PIERCE LOCKED ME DOWN, SHE SAID THE COMMENT WAS “BORDER LINE DISPRESPECT.” ANOTHER FUNNY THING, WHILE SHE WAS TALKING TO ME ABOUT THIS IS ASKED IF SHE WANTED ME TO SAY I WAS SORRY; SHE SAID “NO”.

(the following is what he wrote next to “Investigation Required: N”): OF COURSE NOT! DON’T WANT TO GET TROUBLE GOING BY SOMETHING SILLY AS INMATES ABUSES.

(the following is written in the “sanctions” area): AFTER I “SERVED” THIS TIME, SHE LOCKED ME DOWN AGAIN FOR AN HOUR. REASON; SHE FAILED ME IN DOING HER JOB, BY BRING ME A GLUE STICK SO I MAY BE ABLE TO VIEW MY PICTURES (I LOVE YOU ALL! THANKS!!!) SINCE SHE DEMANDED I PLACE THEM IN MY FOOT LOCKER SINCE I HAD NO WAY TO STICK THEM UP!!! (TAPE NOT ALLOWED-ONLY THE ALL POWERFUL GLUESTICK, WHICH OF COURSE, THE JAIL CONTROLS. BEEN HERE THREE MONTHS ASKING FOR ANYTHING SO I MAY KEEP MY PICTURES OUT, GETTING EMPTY PROMISES!

(the following is what he wrote next to “Officer’s signature”: (OH YEAH, NO PAPERWORK ON ONE HOUR LOCK DOWNS THEY CAN DO IT ANYTIME!)

(the following is written in the “Inmate Signature” area): I DID NOT SIGN IT BECAUSE THERE IS NO SECTION TO DEFEND YOURSELF/COMMENT ON. IF YOU JUST SIGN IT THEN IT “APPEARS” YOU CONGESS YOUR GUILT. YOU DO NOT SIGN IT THEY LOG IT AS REFUSAL, WHICH OF COURSE MAKES YOU LOOK WORST. EITHER WAY, IT WORKS FOR “THEM”.

"There is no waste of time in life like that of making explanations." - D'Israeli

JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6939 on: January 26, 2008, 10:36 PM NHFT »
Update: on the unlawfulness of Title 18 as never properly passed the House & Senate:

See my Reply #____ on page no. ______ here for how I first read about this case with the attorneys working on it,

Today I did visit Danny, and somehow he got word of "Yori Kahl" "Habeas Corpus" is what I plugged into http://www.google.com like he said, but I found only his father's I.R.S. case about Gordon Kahl of 1983 that I remember well, since my friend Andy Melechinsky of Enfield, Conn. even wrote a book on it.

The website is:

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=48609563&blogID=120170532&Mytoken=22B3ACB9-10FC-4938-BEA0E16D53BCE5641127495500

From what Danny told me is that Yori's recent appeal of his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus made it to the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, but that "they"/ all nine judges held a SECRET hearing to dismiss the case or whatever.

This "Secret" hearing or in-chambers tactic is against their own rules, and/or law, but then again, as in N.H. Rule #1 is that they can change the rules at any time, so why bother with rules? just call them dictators, or actually this being the first step toward a tyrannical type of government! and so needing to have all Federals Reps be alerted of this and file a bill of impeachment to get rid of the entire court!  I kid you not!  What they did is bullshit!  and they ought to "buy the farm" like what "they" did to Gordon Kahl.  And Marshall shit-heads:  don't come to some conclusion now that the Supremes are going to be bumped off.  They are going to be bumped alright.  The heaviest impeachment bump or bounce of all time!  This continual corruption in the courts has got to stop! So Federal Reps: get to it.  Tell the judges that they have just bought the farm, like landed on the jail square of the board game Monopoly.  They landed on the farm spot in the game of Life, and so need herding directions as for when and where to go out grazing at pasture to serve out their days.

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas


JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6940 on: January 27, 2008, 01:35 PM NHFT »
Ash Wednesday, February 6th.

--In ten (10) days, it'll be Ash Wednesday, defined as the 7th Wednesday before Easter, and the 1st day of Lent: the 40 weekdays before Easter (beginning on Ash Wednesday), observed as a season of penitence: repentant of misdeeds or sins, from the Latin word: paenitere, to repent: to feel regret* for (what one has done or FAILED* to do.) [emphasis added* for the failure* of that federal official by the name and title of: _________(**), _________ who did omit** or neglect** to file the N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 papers from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. with the N.H. Office of Secretary of State(*). See these words** in the definition of the word fail** at page 257 of The "American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973 that also gives as an example of: "failed to appear", as in two wrongs make a right? Re: the failure to appear by Officer/Employee ___________ (**) at Bill Gardner's Office(*) and Ed's failure to appear at the Tuesday, April 24th Sentencing Hearing, that BTW was on the First Quarter Moon, that looking back: seems appropriate, as half right and half wrong?(***)

(***) Reference: http://home.hiwaay.net/~krcool/Astro/moon/moonphase/ and Colossians 2:16 (in the New Testament of the Holy Bible) "Let no man therefore judge you...in respect of any holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17. Which are a shadow of things to come;...." [see also II Kings 4:23 for another reference to "neither new moon, nor sabbath" in the Old Testament].

--So what is the definition of holy? Belonging to, derived from, or associated with a divine power, see kailo- http://www.bartleby.com/61/roots/IE198.html of: Whole, uninjured, of good omen. And an omen being: 1. A prophetic sign or 2. a portent: an indication of something about to occur, something amazing: to affect with surprise or "wonder"(ful), astound, to bewilder: to confuse or befuddle esp. with numerous conflicting situations, objects or statements, BE + archaic wilder = to stray. 

--See also for the word divine, of in the adjective of: (a) Being or having the nature of a deity, of or relating to a deity, supremely good, magnificent, informal: heavenly, perfect; the noun of (b) a clergyman or theologian; and of the verb (c) of to foretell or prophesy, to guess, infer(****)
  • or conjecture. (*****)


--The word infer(****) means to conclude from evidence; deduce, and to have as a logical consequence.  The word: conjecture (*****) is defined at to infer from in-conclusive evidence. So the question is: (in this case) what does the evidence to be marked as an Exhibit #__ in the trial do? The certificate of federal non-filing. Is it conclusive or in-conclusive evidence? Or in other words: Does it lead to an infer-ance or conjecture? See also the verb definition of the word divine to also mean: guess, as in to predict (a result or event) or assume (a fact) without sufficient information. To estimate or judge correctly. To suppose, to assume to be true for argument's sake, to believe probable, be inclined to think, to consider as a suggestion ("suppose we dine together"), to expect or REQUIRE, (emphasis ADDed for the "shall" word in RSA 123:1), from the Latin word supponere, to put under substitute. To what!? ...

...On June 14, 1883 the General Court of the state of New Hampshire offered this "Consent" to the Feds, but that it was what type of consent? A conditional consent.  On the condition or qualification is the other word that this means, as in to qualify(*******): "to give legal power to" (page 576).  So withOUT the consent, there is no legal power, the word power (page 553, defined as: "3. Strength or force capable of being exercised; might. 4. The ability or capacity to exercise control; authority." So Danny is filing a counter-complaint alright, in the form of a civil lawsuit!

--But back to this "season of penitence" in the first paragraph above.  v. To regret is to feel sorry, disappointed, or distressed about. To mourn. n. Distress over a desire unfulfilled or an ACTion performed of NOT PERFORMED (emphasis ADDed for the federal non-filing). An expression of grief or disappointment.  See also regrets in the plural: A COURTeous declining to accept an invitation. (emphasis ADDed).  So if no filing decision was made, then now to see if there is a reason for WHY not? As in such a written regrets? This regret word from the word regreter, to lament, as in not only 1. To express sorrow or deep regret (over), mourn (page 397), but also: 2. To wail; COMPLAIN. (emphasis ADDed, as yes- this is the season for the biggest complaint from me to them/ the Feds, for this non-action, and so a blunder alright, as in a grave mistake, to bungle(******), the word grave: of being extremely serious(********), important, weighty; critical, from the Latin word gravis of: heavy, weighty (and so the jury, to weigh this as a heavy piece of evidence, very heavy indeed!, plus critical: Forming or of the nature of a crisis: A crucial situation, turning point. To bungle (******) defined as to work, manage, or act ineptly or inefficiently.  The word inept defined as: not apt or fitting, inappropriate; foolish, absurd; awkward, clumsy; incompetent: not competent, competent: (page 147) "Properly qualified" (*******). So with the serious word (********), this is not a directitude, or humorous blunder for wrong or dis-credit, but a non-directitude.  This directitude word as defined to mean this in The "Oxford English Dictionary: (c)1989, and citing Shakespeare as the one in history to have first used this word.

--Today being a Sunday, or sabbath day, as in Exodus 20:11 for a "blessed" day, it is for us to read from this word blessed the definitions of both a give and take.  For the former of to invoke divine favor upon, as upon this day of 24 hours, already done and so declared, and so for us to honor as holy, and glorify this day, see also to confer well-being upon.  The word glory being of not just regular honor, but great honor, and adoration and praise offered in worship.  The word adoration of to pray to, and praise being: 1. an expression of warm approval or admiration. + 2. The extolling of a deity, ruler or hero. [So Sunday for the deity, ____day for the ruler, and ____day for the hero?] To extoll being to praise highly, eulogize: being a public tribute to a person or thing, esp. an oration honoring one recently deceased; Great praise or commendation: defined as not merely to praise, but to commit to the care of another. [As in the judge instructed the defendant/ Ed to be placed within the custody and control of the U.S.Marshall.] The difference here being of the horizontal and vertical, or in some ways even the dimensional, and "The Strange Tale of the Lady in Blue", but more on that later; see http://www.desertusa.com/mag08/jan08/ladyinblue.html by Jay W. Sharp.

J.S.H.

P.S.
  • infer, page 365: "usage: Infer and imply, in their most frequently used senses, are carefully distinguished in modern usage.  To imply is to state indirectly, hint, or intimate.  To infer is to draw a conclusion or make a deduction based on facts or indications.  In these senses the words are not interchangeable."


note: While looking in my Strong's Concordance, (c)1985 @ page 413 for these chapter and verses for the moon, I see also that Psalm 81:3 of to "Blow up the trumpet in the new moon" and found in my Bible here today, a scrap of paper I had put in there years ago, dealing with the First Annual National Justice Convention (in the 1980s) and of: "Harrold 'Bud' Warren, former U.S. Marshal who refused to participate in the Kahl incident in N.D."  A re-type and update of that to follow...


JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6941 on: January 27, 2008, 02:39 PM NHFT »
...
note: ... "Harold 'Bud' Warren, former U.S. Marshal who refused to participate in the Kahl incident in N.D."  ....



--Check out "Harold Bud Warren" over at http://www.google.com and you'll find five (5) websites: two on the Franklin Cover-Up, and three others.

--The first one is called "A KAHL TO ARMS" by Steven P. Wagner, 02-09-2003 e-mail swagner at forumcomm dot com, Tel. (701) 241-5542 in Medina, North Dakota at http://www.in-forum.com/specials/gordonkahl/index.cfm?id=27415

--The second one goes over to that Google books website where it spells it out that Ronald Reagan replaced the good marshal with this bad apple Ken Muir who got killed. This after Gordon Kahl had declared that "The Communist Manifesto had supplanted the Constitution" and Muir said in effect that he doesn't give a shit about the seizure to forfeit his eight (80) acres of farm land. The bad marshal asked the good marshal to back him up, and the good marshal said: no.

--See also the third website for the reason WHY of this mentality of the sociopathic marshals in their thinking of that the end justifies the means.  Over at "The Legalized Murder of Gordon Kahl and The Official Cover-Up" by Pat Shannon, http://www.patshannan.com/gordonkahlmurdercoverup.html in that "J. Edgar Hoover had been dead for more than a decade, but his unwritten rule stressing the need for keeping the sterling image of the FBI above everything else was still deeply entrenched." and "Warren was known and respected by the Kahl family as one of the 'good guy' marshals who was far more interested in seeing the truth come out than protecting the image of the FBI or the Marshal's Service."

--The same comparison of image over the truth can be applied to Ed's case, as in what I've been hearing of: might over right, but WHO withIN the New Hampshire Marshal's Service is this "good guy"? if any?

JSH

JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6942 on: January 27, 2008, 03:16 PM NHFT »
....
....

Update: ...the N.H. State Trooper ... Headquarters was looking for my current/correct address for where to return my $1.00 bill donation to the "Ed Brown Protection Fund"....


According to my neighbor, and the postal clerk who issued the envelope, the certified mail with the $1.00 bill and any cover letter* will be ready for me to pick up later today: Wed., Nov. 7th.

* I'll re-type the wording of the cover-letter to maybe find out WHY they refused to accept this for Ed's Article 12 protection at the state level against the Feds operating as outlaws to RSA Ch. 123:1 from 1-8-17 U.S. Const.

-- Joe ....


Update: While visiting the State House on Friday afternoon, they must have seen me on the cameras and alerted the State Trooper on duty there: Scott Phillips, Badge ID No. 676, who met me outside the House Speaker's office(*) on the third floor, and gave me back my $1.00 bill that they mailed to me by CERTIFIED MAIL #7000-0600-0024-7795-1413 on November 05, 2007 cost: $5.21 PITNEY BOWES Meter #02-1M-0004221641 FROM 03301, and with both: (1) my original signed copy of Reply #5165 on page 345 above of 7/30/2007, Monday @ 1:46 PM, see the pc2: paragraph that was delivered to the State Police of 8/31/07,Fri; and (2) their signed letter to me as re-typed as follows:

"State of New Hampshire, DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, John J. Barthelmes, Commissioner of Safety, Division of State Police, James H. Hayes Safety Building, 33 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03305  271-2575 Colonel Frederick H. Booth

November 2, 2007

Mr. Joseph S. Haas, Jr. ...
Concord, NH 03301

RE: Special Protection Fund

Dear Mr. Haas,

--The New Hampshire State Police have not established, nor do we intend to so, a special protection fund for the Brown's.  Therefore your donation of $1.00 is being returned to you.

--Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Sincerely, - - - - - - - - - - - Lt. David Cargill".

JSH

P.S. See also POSSESSED PROPERTY REPORT of 1/25/08 on Form #DSSP 104A (Rev. 5/88).

(*) Here's a typing of my hand-written note to both The Senate President, Sylvia Larsen, and House Speaker, Terri Norelli delivered to their receptionists on Fri. 1/25/08 @ 1:45 p.m.:  "Please indicate whether the 'shall' word in RSA 123:1 is mandatory or is enabling**, such as non-directitude* as in IF wanted then must be done.  Thank you, - - - - - - - - - - JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, 848-6059  * directitude = humorous blunder for wrong or dis-credit; ** as in a law enabling admission of a state." [to the Union.] - - (1) Jeff Meyers, the Legal Counsel for the Senate, Room 304 @ 271-2111, and (2) David Frydman, the House legal counsel, Room 308, to get back to me.

JosephSHaas

  • Enemy of the State
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 42
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 2745
  • Karma: 994
    • View Profile
    • "The Collapsing Door" [U.F.O.]
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6943 on: January 27, 2008, 04:36 PM NHFT »
....

....

....

....


Update: ...

"State of New Hampshire, ... Division of State Police, ...
Sincerely, - - - - - - - - - - - Lt. David Cargill".(*) ....



(*) He must be a relative of "Clutch Cargo":

coffeeseven

  • Rebel
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1223
  • Karma: 702
  • Oh bother said the Borg. We've assimilated Pooh.
    • View Profile
Re: Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS
« Reply #6944 on: January 27, 2008, 09:09 PM NHFT »
....

....

....

....


Update: ...

"State of New Hampshire, ... Division of State Police, ...
Sincerely, - - - - - - - - - - - Lt. David Cargill".(*) ....



(*) He must be a relative of "Clutch Cargo": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFnLirXjjto


Oh hell no! You didn't just link to a Clutch Cargo cartoon. Is nothing sacred???   >:D