Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a re-type:

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
55 PLEASANT STREET, ROOM 110
CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-3941

OFFICE OF THE CLERK
James R. Starr, Clerk of Court
Daniel J. Lynch, Chief Deputy Clerk

Telephone: 603-225-1423
Web: www.nhd.uscourts.gov

November 14, 2011

Joseph S. Haas, Jr.
PO Box 3842
Concord, NH 03302-3842

Re: Email Correspondence/Request for List USDC-NH Bar Members

Dear Mr. Haas:

--I am writing in response to the string of emails you have been forwarding to me and/or sending directly to my email address and carbon copied to numerous other email accounts.  I am also writing in response to your request of a list of all members of the district's bar.

--Please note that the United States Judicial Branch is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. See 5 U.S.C. Sec. 551(a)(B), 552(f).  Additionally, while we attempt to satisfy all reasonable research to members of the public nor to rebut or debate members of the public on matters related to the jurisdiction of the federal court system.  In fact, attacks on the court's jurisdiction are properly addressed by a presiding judge in an existing case consistent with the adjudicatory process.  Thus, I decline to exchange correspondence 'debating' the merits or logic to your positions on the constitutional or statutory basis for this district's civil or criminal jurisdiction.  Additionally, because the Clerk's Office does not assemble and publicly distribute a cumulative list of members of our bar upon request, I also decline to forward to you the requested list.

--Lastly, our office attempts to comply with all reasonable requests for information from the public and members of the bar.  We are not required, nor will Clerk Starr or I permit our staff, to respond to inquiries that are unreasonable, nonsensical and designed to harass or otherwise burden staff for your personal pleasure or amusement.  Thus, I regret to inform you that all such requests received in the future will go without response whether sent by email or in paper letter format.  Additionally, as I do not desire to receive your continued e-mail postings, I request you remove me from your email list, refrain from sending me further email correspondence, and note that future emails will be redirected to a spam account and will not be reviewed.

Sincerely, Daniel K. Lynch, Chief Deputy Clerk

DJL/ "

[JosephSHaas]

Here are the four (4) Lebanon Reps who are looking into signing this Article 32 Petition to get Ed the damages from the filing fee stolen and to continue his 2005 CIVIL case #033 in Grafton County Superior Court (North Haverhill, N.H.) that was side-tracked by these Federal thieves in cahoots with Judge Jean K. Burling deviating away from 28USC636(c)(1) and her RSA Ch. 92:2 oath for us Article 12 inhabitants who has got to be impeached! :

"
(2)   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/wmlresults.aspx?town=Lebanon

and   Who's My Legislator?
Grafton County
Lebanon

Representatives:
District 11
   Ward 1

   Susan W Almy : 266 Poverty Lane Unit 4B , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-2730

   Franklin F Gould : 58 Elm St , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-1846

   Laurie Harding : 56 Jenkins Rd , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-2003

   Andrew A White : 16 Young St , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-1234
   Ward 2

   Susan W Almy : 266 Poverty Lane Unit 4B , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-2730

   Franklin F Gould : 58 Elm St , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-1846

   Laurie Harding : 56 Jenkins Rd , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-2003

   Andrew A White : 16 Young St , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-1234
   Ward 3

   Susan W Almy : 266 Poverty Lane Unit 4B , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-2730

   Franklin F Gould : 58 Elm St , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-1846

   Laurie Harding : 56 Jenkins Rd , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-2003

   Andrew A White : 16 Young St , Lebanon,  NH ,    03766-1234


and so
(a)  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376095

and
Representative Susan Almy (d)
Grafton- District 11
Seat #:5008
Incumbent Home Address:
          266 Poverty Lane Unit 4B
          Lebanon, NH  03766-2730
     Phone: (603)448-4769
     Email: susan.almy at comcast.net
More:
   

   Voting Record    Bills Sponsored    
House Commitee Information

   Committee Name:    WAYS AND MEANS

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3529    

   Committee Function:
It is the duty of the Committee on Ways and Means to examine and consider the state of the treasury; to consider and report on all bills and resolutions relating to raising money by a state tax and the apportionment of same, state fees, and all methods of raising revenue for the state; and such other matters as may be referred to it. The Committee on Ways and Means reports to the House, in the form of a resolution, its estimates of state revenues on a periodic basis.
Personal Website:

   N/A
Personal Biography:

   Rep. Almy is serving her fifth term as a member of the House and represents Grafton County District 11, the City of Lebanon. She worked as a socio-economic researcher/program developer in agricultural and rural development from 1971-1994, focusing on Africa and Latin America, and earned her Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1974.
Local Government Involvement:

   Rep. Almy is a member of the Lebanon Conservation Commission and the Grafton County Executive Committee
Miscellaneous Information:

   Rep. Almy recommends the following numbers for assistance:
The Lebanon Housing Authority (603) 298-5753
Social Services (LISTEN) (603) 448-4553
Helpline Hotline (24 hours) (603) 448-4400
Teenline Hotline (toll free) 1(800) 639-6095
© 2006 New Hampshire House of Representatives,
107 North Main Street, Concord, New Hampshire, 03301, (603) 271-3661" and

(b) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376817

and
Representative Franklin Gould (d)
Grafton- District 11
Seat #:4049
Incumbent Home Address:
          58 Elm St
          Lebanon, NH  03766-1846
     Phone: (603)448-1660
     Email: frank.gould at leg.state.nh.us
More:
   

   Voting Record    Bills Sponsored    
House Commitee Information

   Committee Name:    CHILDREN AND FAMILY LAW

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3184    

   Committee Function:
N/A
Personal Website:

   N/A
Personal Biography:

   N/A
Local Government Involvement:

   N/A
Miscellaneous Information:

   N/A
" and

(c)  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376583

and
Representative Laurie Harding (d)
Grafton- District 11
Seat #:5031
Incumbent Home Address:
          56 Jenkins Rd
          Lebanon, NH  03766-2003
     Phone: (603)448-5206
     Email: lharding0625 at gmail.com
More:
   

   Voting Record    Bills Sponsored    
House Commitee Information

   Committee Name:    HEALTH, HUMAN SERVICES & ELDERLY AFFAIRS

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3334    

   Committee Function:
N/A
Personal Website:

   N/A
Personal Biography:

   Rep. Harding is serving her third term representing Grafton County District 11. A registered nurse licensed to practice in both New Hampshire and Vermont, she holds a bachelor's degree in nursing from Syracuse University and a master's degree from Boston University.
Local Government Involvement:

   N/A
Miscellaneous Information:

   Rep. Harding is a member of the executive committee of the Eastern Region Council of State Government, and a member of the board of directors of Headrest. She also serves on the professional advisory committee of Service Link, and serves on the steering committee of New Hampshire Nursing Summit.
and
(d) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376894

and
Representative Andrew White (d)
Grafton- District 11
Seat #:4074
Incumbent Home Address:
          16 Young St
          Lebanon, NH  03766-1234
     Phone: (603)727-9392
     Email: andrew.white at leg.state.nh.us
More:
   

   Voting Record    Bills Sponsored    
House Commitee Information

   Committee Name:    LABOR, INDUSTRIAL AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3125    

   Committee Function:
N/A
Personal Website:

   N/A
Personal Biography:

   N/A
Local Government Involvement:

   N/A
Miscellaneous Information:

   N/A
end "

[JosephSHaas]

Here are the names, addresses and telephone #s of the five State Reps. in Somersworth looking into the Impeachment of Lynch for allowing Federal thieves to cross their Bridge into Berwick, Maine with our Article 12 inhabitants who never gave either the 1-8-17 U.S. Consent by the Constitution, nor any individual 18USC3232 consent: [ Lynch having FAILed and REFUSing to do his Art. 51 duty of to execute the laws of the state AND of the United States BOTH, that includes the sword AND the shield of this "protection", by allowing this "Protection Racket" to continue! ]

"To:

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/wmlresults.aspx?town=Somersworth

Who's My Legislator?
Strafford County
Somersworth

Representatives:
District 02

Wards #1-5:


   Roger R Berube : 15 Stackpole Road , Somersworth,  NH ,    03878-1627

   Kirsten L Larsen Schultz : 219 West High Street , Somersworth,  NH ,    03878-1526

   Philip L Munck : 4 Woodchuck Lane , Somersworth,  NH ,    03878-2821

   Dale S Spainhower : 14 Midway Park , Somersworth,  NH ,    03878-1005

   Dale R Sprague : 35 Page Street , Somersworth,  NH ,    03878-2738

Please do a search/find this page from the upper left tab for the word "Somersworth" in my e-mail below to find this in context of: " And those other Reps in Somersworth at just before the Somersworth-Berwick Bridge, because of the unlawful and illegal pre-trial hearings with Judge George Z. Singal in Portland, Maine: a violation of the Sixth (6th) Amendment in that ALL trials SHALL be in the state AND district of where the offense occurred". Of to please sign a group Bill of Impeachment against these three N.H. Supreme Court judges from this 2007 incident involving: Dalianis, Duggan and Hicks.

Thank you "very" much! - - - - - - - - - - Joe  /  Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

1. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=375965
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=375965

Representative Roger Berube (d) Strafford- District 02
Seat #:5035
Incumbent Home Address:
          15 Stackpole Road
          Somersworth, NH  03878-1627
     Phone: (603)692-5653
     Email: rogerrberube at hotmail.com

   CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3565


2. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376963
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376963

Representative Kirsten Larsen Schultz (r) Strafford- District 02
Seat #:2034
New Home Address:
          219 West High Street
          Somersworth, NH  03878-1526
     Phone: (603)785-8415
     Email: kirsten.larsen at leg.state.nh.us

   STATE-FEDERAL RELATIONS AND VETERANS AFFAIRS

   Position:    Clerk    

   Telephone:    271-3554


*3. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376988
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376988

Representative Philip Munck (r) Strafford- District 02
Seat #:3096
New Home Address:
          4 Woodchuck Lane
          Somersworth, NH  03878-2821
     Phone: (603)692-3316
     Email: philip.munck at leg.state.nh.us

   MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY GOVERNMENT

   Position:    Clerk    

   Telephone:    271-3317


4. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=377032
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=377032

Representative Dale Spainhower (d) Strafford- District 02
Seat #:4057
New Home Address:
          14 Midway Park
          Somersworth, NH  03878-1005
     Phone: (603)750-4112
     Email: dale.spainhower at leg.state.nh.us

   STATE-FEDERAL RELATIONS AND VETERANS AFFAIRS

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3554


5.  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376769
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376769


Representative Dale Sprague (d) Strafford- District 02
Seat #:5040
Incumbent Home Address:
          35 Page Street
          Somersworth, NH  03878-2738
     Phone: (603)692-3440
     Email: dale.sprague at leg.state.nh.us

   PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

   Position:    Member    

   Telephone:    271-3565 "

See e-mail research of this Sixth (6th) Amendment to follow. . .

[JosephSHaas]

"From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: rogerrberube at hotmail.com; kirsten.larsen at leg.state.nh.us; philip.munck at leg.state.nh.us; dale.spainhower at leg.state.nh.us; dale.sprague at leg.state.nh.us; daniel_lynch at nhd.uscourts.gov; jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; elections at sos.state.nh.us; wgardner at sos.state.nh.us; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; ebailey at sheehan.com
Subject: Update to the Kansas case.
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:20:44 -0500

Here's the Sat., Nov. 12th @ 3:42 p.m.  Forward, as promised.

- - Joe Haas

"Update:

I've just read this 15-page document over at: http://pub.bna.com/cl/98571p.pdf entitled: "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, No. 98,571 State of Kansas... v. Alfonzal Jones...." wherein the actual quote is something different than what Danny summarizes.  * It's actually worse at page 10 of: "at the preliminary hearing instead of at trial" and at page 11 of: "at either the preliminary hearing or the trial" meaning two separate things with the words of "instead of" and the "or" word, but see pages 8, 9 + 10 above that of:

page 8: "The right to counsel applies at all 'critical stages' of the criminal process of an accused who faces incarceration. Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77, 80, 158 L.Ed.2d 209, 124 S.Ct. 1379 (2004); and

page 9: "The Sixth Amendment does not provide merely that a defense shall be made for the accused; it grants to the accused personally the right to make this defense." 555 U.S. at 819-20.; and

page 10: "A preliminary hearing is often a critical stage of the criminal process.  See, e.g. Moore v. Illinois, 434 U.S. 120, 54 L.Ed.2d 424, 98 S.Ct.458 (1977)...; Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 9, 26 L.Ed.2d 387, 90 S.Ct. 1999 (197) ('guiding hand' of counsel at preliminary hearing is essential to protect against erroneous or improper prosecution;" and:

"  : "The preliminary hearing is a critical phase of the criminal prosecution."

So there you have the inter-changing with the word critical of two different words of either a stage or phase.

Plus also see for the word prosecution = from the word prosecute = "To initiate and conduct court action against", (as in the word trial * of the act or process) and over to conduct = in the verbs of not merely to guide, as in the "guiding hand" so stated, but also to "lead" = to guide OR escort = "One of more persons or vehicles accompanying another to give guidance or protection or to pay honor." Reference: The "American Heritage Dictionary of The English Language" (c)1973 @ page 245.

And so like Ed did appoint in writing while he was at the Stafford County Jail in Dover, N.H. Bernie Bastian and me as his Council of counselors to go along WITH the court-appointed attorney Mike Iacopino from Manchester, then for the facility to ALLOW Bernie to see him just as a visitor, but not me as either a visitor NOR as one of his counselors, then that's WHY I filed my case against The County Commissioners in Dover District Court that the Assistant County Attorney** filed some appeal fee FOR a trial by jury, but then decided against such, BUT that the case has YET to be sent back to the District Court for a hearing on the merits or bench trial as PAID for but yet to obtain. And so a copy of this at the 100% print-out to file there maybe next week.

Re: Case # 432-2009-SC-473 .

I'll let you know how it goes. -- Joe

** The Assistant County Attorney
Stephen J. LaBonte
P.O. Box 799
Dover, N.H. 03821-0799
603: 749-2808 "

[JosephSHaas]

"Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 663 »    KBCraig    9943    566851    Last post Today at 01:18 PM
by JosephSHaas "

Mod:   http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?board=1.0

[JosephSHaas]

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us; jgoley03104 at yahoo.com; peter.ramsey at leg.state.nh.us
CC: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; wgardner at sos.state.nh.us; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; michael.a.delaney at doj.nh.gov
Subject: [Did you get this?] RE: (thanks for your prompt answer, even though I don't like it) RE: (Airport) RE: [Fortnight "Progress Report" requested] RE: (First Draft) Impeach Gov. Lynch.
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:57:48 -0500

Did you get this?

What are you waiting for? An Update to the Annual Report?  In which case: Bill, please let me know when you do this, or do you need a push from the Councilors? A copy of the 664 to follow. . .

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us
CC: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov
Subject: (thanks for your prompt answer, even though I don't like it) RE: (Airport) RE: [Fortnight "Progress Report" requested] RE: (First Draft) Impeach Gov. Lynch.
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:36:28 -0500

So in other words you agree that he's to violate his oath eh? Nice guy. (;-) Thank you Rep. Sullivan of at least you show your true colors and leaning toward the corruption of just what I did write about that this is a "First Draft" letter for Guinta to sign, and NOT that of me "signing his name to letters" in the plural, of the - - - of where he IS to sign in the FUTURE tense, not past or current tense.  Please get with the times! A reply to him too of my reply to you of such. I had met him in person for the first time at the Rochester Job Fair back in June and asked that he look into this "Uncle Sam" warehouse policy of keeping inmates on ice rather than to Article 18 N.H. re-habilitate them with a course of #x number of classes in the subject matter for which they were and are incarcerated. A situation that was pre-ventable by Lynch, the Democrat but of refusing to execute the law 51 of BOTH the sword AND the shield.  Thus whether the governor be an R or D should not really matter, but that of to do what is right.  And so you what? Taking the Party Position of your governor can do no wrong?  YOU to decide his trial withOUT even being impeached!?  This is pre-judicial! You really disgust me in this part, although you earn a gold star in the Article 14 part of being "prompt" to my third pitch to you, but hardly a home run, but a FOUL ball! (;-) Very foul! -- Joe Haas

From: Dan.Sullivan at leg.state.nh.us
To: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
Subject: RE: (Airport) RE: [Fortnight "Progress Report" requested] RE: (First Draft) Impeach Gov. Lynch.
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 17:22:22 +0000

Mr. Haas,
No interest in impeaching the Gov.  As far as the Airport ribbon cutting, I had planned to attend but have a committee meeting at 10:00 in Concord.  Also, I forwarded your email to Congressman Guinta to see how he likes you speaking for him and signing his name to letters.
Thank You,
Rep. Dan Sullivan
From: Joseph S. Haas Jr. [josephshaasjr at hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 12:10 PM
To: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; Goley, Jeff; Ramsey, Peter; Sullivan, Dan; wgardner at sos.state.nh.us; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; michael.a.delaney at doj.nh.gov
Subject: (Airport) RE: [Fortnight "Progress Report" requested] RE: (First Draft) Impeach Gov. Lynch.
See you at the Ribbon Ceremony on Thursday morning over at the Airport?

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; jgoley03104 at yahoo.com; peter.ramsey at leg.state.nh.us; dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us; wgardner at sos.state.nh.us; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; michael.a.delaney at doj.nh.gov
Subject: [Fortnight "Progress Report" requested] RE: (First Draft) Impeach Gov. Lynch.
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:13:21 -0400

Fortnight "Progress Report" Requested.

It's been OVER 2 weeks. Please Reply.
From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; jgoley03104 at yahoo.com; peter.ramsey at leg.state.nh.us; dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us
CC: wgardner at sos.state.nh.us; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; michael.a.delaney at doj.nh.gov
Subject: (First Draft) Impeach Gov. Lynch.
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:01:05 -0400

First Draft (to be signed by Frank Guinta)

To:
Representatives:
District 08
   Ward 1
   Jeffrey P Goley : 1683 River Rd , Manchester,  NH ,    03104-1645
   Peter E Ramsey : 418 North Gate Rd , Manchester,  NH ,    03104-1847
   Daniel J Sullivan : 172 Arah Street , Manchester,  NH ,    03104-2119

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/wmlresults.aspx?town=Manchester
[ confirmed by woman at City Clerk's office this morning: 624- 6455 @ 10:23 a.m. ]
http://www.manchesternh.gov/website/Departments/tabid/96/Default.aspx

(1) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376227

Representative Jeffrey Goley (d)
Hillsborough- District 08
Seat #:4060
Incumbent Home Address:
          1683 River Rd
          Manchester, NH  03104-1645
     Phone: (603)626-6659
     Email: jgoley03104 at yahoo.com
More:    
Member: Labor Committee

(2) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376891

Representative Peter Ramsey (d)
Hillsborough- District 08
Seat #:4038
Incumbent Home Address:
          418 North Gate Rd
          Manchester, NH  03104-1847
     Phone: (603)668-9702
     Email: peter.ramsey at leg.state.nh.us
More:    
Public Works & Highways Member

(3) http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376692

Representative Daniel Sullivan (d)
Hillsborough- District 08
Seat #:5021
Incumbent Home Address:
          172 Arah Street
          Manchester, NH  03104-2119
     Phone: (603)627-5044
     Email: dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us
More:    
ED&A member.

From:
Frank Guinta
33 Lowell Street
Manchester, NH 03101
Phone: (603) 641-9536
Fax: (603) 641-9561
Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:30am - 5:00pm (also available Wednesday evenings by appointment)
http://guinta.house.gov/

Dear State Representatives: Goley, Ramsey, and Sullivan

This is Frank Guinta.  As my State Reps to The General Court in Concord, N.H. would you please see to it that a Bill of Impeachment process through the Legislature next year in 2012 against Governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton. He is WHO ought to be Article 17 impeached for an Article 38 trial in the Senate. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/constitution.html See also Article 40.

The WHAT of exactness is his violation of his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm
in not protecting two of our N.H. Article 12 "inhabitants" namely Ed & Elaine Brown of Plainfield from these "other laws" of Congress never Consented to by us, as in our CONDITIONAL offer of June 14, 1884; see: R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm and http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm ] of which the U.S. Attorney and U.S. Marshal are in a denial frame of mind that can be called: sociopathic! Our governor by Article 51 supposed to enforce BOTH the laws of the state AND of the United States, of like the sword AND the shield of protection, but that he chose only the former.  This is in-completeness against Article 14 and so ought to get him removed from office.

My constituent Joseph S. Haas who voted for me, has asked that I proceed with this request to you, and so here it is as signed by me also filing my own House Bill of Impeachment here in Washington, D.C. against George Z. Singal of Portland, Maine, who was designated by Judge Stephen McAuliffe to travel to this Sixth (6th) Amendment state AND district of where the offense occurred, but who was too lazy to do so in totality as pre-trials are a part of the trial, and because the end does NOT justify the means, in what we are supposed to have is also "procedural due process of law", then him of who had these protested pre-trials in Portland, Maine to also be impeached at the Federal level, as a criminal to the law and the statute too of 18USC3232 in him also having acted illegally!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Frank Guinta

pc: Ed & Elaine Brown, with my appreciation of having stood up to Uncle Sam who has yet to have the U.S. Codes "put into effect" IS the definition of the phrase "in pursuance thereof", as it is not pursuant to, as the agreement by filing has yet to occur.  Bill Gardner, our Secretary of State KNOWS this but whose Annual Report of an accounting included no counting of these two papers as required by the "shall" word in RSA 123:1, instead merely presenting to the G&C   http://www.nh.gov/council/ a partial job description!  You ought to also fire him from his Article 67 duties. "

[JosephSHaas]

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: lharding0625 at gmail.com; andrew.white at leg.state.nh.us; go2teach at comcast.net; susan.almy at comcast.net
CC: matthew.houde at leg.state.nh.us; daniel_lynch at nhd.uscourts.gov; jay.ruais at mail.house.gov
Subject: [Initiative] RE: [Reply to Laurie] RE: (POA - soon) RE: [Lebanon: Petition/Impeachment/House Bill of Address] RE: (Year 2005) RE: [Case #05-C-033]RE: (Monthly Progress Report) RE: Impeach Burling. - Please
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:35:46 -0500

This is a follow-up to yesterday's e-mail, of me still waiting for an answer to my question of WHY did you include Senator Houde, who was actually useless when a State Rep. as a blocker rather than a bridge when I first brought this "Protection Racket" of the City of Lebanon to his attention.  Him a Law Professor over at the Vermont Law School who has yet to give a reply to the below of reference that answer I'm still waiting to hear back from Dan Lynch over at the Rudman Block in Concord. A copy to him to please reply so as to what? THEN you all can sign onto an Article 32 Petition.

Laurie wrote that" "  I will not be signing onto any new legislative initiatives at this point in time." Of that "point being what? Like a big "black hole" encompassing how much time? Measured in days, weeks, months or what?

Plus the word initiate is defined as: "1. To begin or originate." Surely this is NOT your definition of such, right?  Because to begin or start, all that's needed is your signature and district # on a printout of this e-mail to get this going, for which you like lauch the ship with the champagne bottle and then leave it up to me, the captain with P.O.A. to steer it through the committee.  You might also be there to introduce yourself in person to the committee that: yes, this is your signature, and that you are FOR "due process of law", aka The Rule of Law, plus your RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office for Article 14 "complete"ness, and the check-and-balance system we are supposed to have when two members within the other branch, in this case: steals the filing fee, etc.

My presumption is that you're too lazy to start this and so go by the definition of the word initiative to mean: "1. The ability to begin OR follow through with a plan; enterprise." (emphasis ADDed for what you might have thought was what? an AND word?  No; the word is OR, and it applies ONLY to the former and not the latter, of for you to please "begin" by signing with your district # and I will do the rest by the "follow through". )

Definition #2 of the word initiative is the simplest: "2. The first step or action; opening move" of WHO to move second? This is a team effort. If there was no House Rule 36 calling for an endorsement, then I would not be bothering you.  But that there is, and if you do not sign, then what? A copy of this posted to the Front Door of the State House with a Railroad Spike like what Martin Luther did to bring it to the attention of others? Or will the House Speaker supply a bulletin board for public proclamations? You have your House Calendar, and House Records, and so We The People to what? Have our Art. 32 petition process of HOW it notified to the legislative body by such postings? or interruptions in a Point of Order? In that Article 31 gives the purpose for which you meet is to "assemble for the redress of public grievances" and THEN in that order: "making such laws". Thus leading over to definition #3: "The procedure by which citizens can propose a law by petition and ensure its submission to the electorate." Or in other words an idea for legislation need not necessarily have to be put in by a State Rep. but also by petition, and so then that House Rule 36 really out-of-order! Please look into getting rid of this part of House Rule 36.  I think it is unconstitutional. Do you have such a "procedure" in place for such now? No, but then you already took your $200/2-year pay already without doing the work, right?  Shame on you! SHAME! Thus if not a simple signature, then let this be war! To get this "procedure" in place by disruptions, calling the LSRs to HBs out-of-order when there be petitions un-addressed. OLD Wrongs to be righted BEFORE any NEW or amended legislation of the statutes.

How would you feel if you were thrown into jail for asserting your rights as are supposed to be a guarantee by the First Amendment? You're more to what we rebelled against of King George meeting our many petitions with repeated injuries. You are really a disgrace to the human race if you take this: "Not me" attitude any further.  Really! Get with the program: that of the petition process.  This court clerk and judge did wrong and which NEEDs to be addressed, not because of them still players, as having retired, to prevent this from happening to others, as it did with this same violation of 28USC636(c)(1) by the Supremes in case #2007-0745, but to right this wrong.  Of you supposed to be there toward the truth, NOT to cover it up!

Joe Haas

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: lharding0625 at gmail.com
CC: andrew.white at leg.state.nh.us; go2teach at comcast.net; susan.almy at comcast.net; matthew.houde at leg.state.nh.us
Subject: [Reply to Laurie] RE: (POA - soon) RE: [Lebanon: Petition/Impeachment/House Bill of Address] RE: (Year 2005) RE: [Case #05-C-033]RE: (Monthly Progress Report) RE: Impeach Burling. - Please
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:40:41 -0500

Thank you too Laurie, but WHY did you include Senator Houde?  IF and WHEN Burling is impeached THEN he will get to vote.  In the meantime if with no "new legislative initiatives at this point in time." of the word initiatives meaning, what? Bills AND Petitions? Then maybe Rep. White, as his limit is only to House Bills, of that he can share* that e-mail I did just send to him with you four Reps, but please - not to Senator Houde so as to prejudice him to judge this case along with the other 23 N.H. Senators. Thank you, Joe

* I did just notice that your reply is to one of his bcc's to you all, and so to send you my reply to Rep. White by a Forward. . .

P.S. Maybe you meant to send it to Houde because of just what IS a State Rep.'s job description?  In that case of I guess O.K. as the more legal and lawful opinions the better, of this like water already over the dam, and so to him too.
CC: andrew.white at leg.state.nh.us; go2teach at comcast.net; susan.almy at comcast.net; matthew.Houde at leg.state.nh.us
From: lharding0625 at gmail.com
To: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
Subject: Re: (POA - soon) RE: [Lebanon: Petition/Impeachment/House Bill of Address] RE: (Year 2005) RE: [Case #05-C-033]RE: (Monthly Progress Report) RE: Impeach Burling. - Please
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:33:53 -0500

Hello Mr. Haas-
We have all been in communication with Rep. Almy re: this issue.  It made sense to have one spokesperson for the four of us.   I will not be signing onto any new legislative initiatives at this point in time. 
Laurie
Rep. Laurie Harding
Grafton 11, Lebanon, NH
603-667-7734
On Nov 14, 2011, at 1:16 PM, White, Andrew wrote:

    Mr. Haas,

    I did personally communicate with Representative Almy, and her email communicated my feelings.

    In New Hampshire, Representative districts are carefully made up based on residents of the community, not property owners, but residents, therefore I believe it is my duty to represent the interests of Lebanon residents in the New Hampshire House.

    I would also encourage you to contact the elected officials in the community where you reside. I, for one, am not interested in signing on to any additional bills this session.

    Best Regards,


    Andrew White, Representative
    Grafton District 11

    . . . 
    Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

    ----- Reply message -----
    From: "Joseph S. Haas Jr." <josephshaasjr at hotmail.com>
    To: "Almy, Susan" <susan.almy at comcast.net>
    Cc: "Gould, Franklin" <Franklin.Gould at leg.state.nh.us>, "lharding0625 at gmail.com" <lharding0625 at gmail.com>, "White, Andrew" <andrew.white at leg.state.nh.us>
    Subject: (POA - soon) RE: [Lebanon: Petition/Impeachment/House Bill of Address] RE: (Year 2005) RE: [Case #05-C-033]RE: (Monthly Progress Report) RE: Impeach Burling. - Please
    Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2011 12:50

    Thank you Rep. Almy for your reply with my presumption that you all four State Reps for Lebanon either met, talked by phone and/or communicated by e-mail of for you to be the what? contact person of the group to give me this answer?  Of yes, of course I know that you are NOT my Reps., but that of for Ed & Elaine Brown per their property there as trustees of the Trust that gets the property tax bills from the City, ATT Trust, and so WHEN I get that POA from Ed as one of the trustees that he wrote that he was sending out to me last Monday (exactly a week ago) THEN I will have the power to ask you with authority too, to please if you're took chicken to do an Impeachment or House Bill of Address, to at the very least sign to House Rule 36 endorse a complaint with your signatures and district # of such theft of filing fee and sheriff costs in Ed trying to get that first civil trial by jury in Grafton County Superior Court in North Haverhill that was unlawfully and illegally gotten off track by former Court Clerk Robert B. Muh there who did violate his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath, or did he not have such as serving at the pleasure of the judges being the officials for him being this employee, of what? to take him to the JCC? of a copy of your reply and mine here too to both Ed & Elaine to give them this "Progress Report."  Yours truly, -- Joe Haas

    Subject: Re: [Lebanon: Petition/Impeachment/House Bill of Address] RE: (Year 2005) RE: [Case #05-C-033]RE: (Monthly Progress Report) RE: Impeach Burling. - Please
    To: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
    From: susan.almy at comcast.net
    Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:02:14 +0000

    Mr. Haas, we are all of the same mind. You are not our constituent, you have your own reps, please go to them.
    Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device from U.S. Cellular
    From: "Joseph S. Haas Jr." <josephshaasjr at hotmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:49:14 -0500
    To: <susan.almy at comcast.net>; <frank.gould at leg.state.nh.us>; <lharding0625 at gmail.com>; <andrew.white at leg.state.nh.us>
    Cc: Joe Haas<josephshaas at hotmail.com>
    Subject: [Lebanon: Petition/Impeachment/House Bill of Address] RE: (Year 2005) RE: [Case #05-C-033]RE: (Monthly Progress Report) RE: Impeach Burling. - Please
    Dear Lebanon Reps Almy, Gould, Harding, and White:

    Re: "Dear State Reps LeFebvre and Schmidt for to represent civil cases in the House Grievance Committee on Redress by Article 32 Petitions for those victims of aggression by RSA Ch. 643:1 "Official Oppression" that happened in your town of Plainfield;

    and: State Representatives Almy, Gould, Harding and White for similar duties concerning your City of Lebanon."

    Here's a copy and paste of not only a Petition, but that of either an Impeachment and/or House Bill of Address too, as being worked on by one of the Plainfield Reps on a relay over to another to co-sponsor, or vice-versa as a subject-matter Rep.:

    Wed., Nov. 2nd:

    "To: Representative _____________

    Re: To Address/Impeach/Petition Jean K. Burling

    Dear Rep. ________ :

    --This is a follow-up to the voice mail that I did just leave on your home recorder this morning at about 11:45 o'clock a.m. to please get back to me, of your name and that of another: ________ (*) given to me by State Rep. _________of Plainfield (getting a courtesy copy to: _________ )  as a subject-matter Rep. to see about one of three possibilities:
    (1) a House Address;
    (2) a House Bill of Impeachment (Article 17 to 38 trial in the Senate) ; or;
    (3) An Article 32 Petition to the new Republican House Grievance Committee,

    against Judge Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe) Burling for having violated her RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office in allowing NOT an other law of a U.S. Code (Civil) to control over one of our Article 12 N.H. inhabitants*, BUT a Federal policy**.  The other law being Title 28 U.S. Code Section 636(c)(1) that requires that for the Feds to be allowed jurisdiction to hear a case by the Removal process the party to the case has to give his "consent", that in Case #05-C-033 in Grafton County Superior Court was never done! but that the Clerk Robert B. Muh*** did send it anyway, as approved by the judge!

    Of us, as in me with P.O.A. to soon obtain to take this to the House Redress of Grievance Committee, thus needing your House Rule 36 endorsement of such please for your signature and District Number to move this along toward initial damages of theft of this filing fee and Sheriff costs toward a claimed-for trial by jury, with $more later, AND to halt those Article 36 Retirement checks of about $75,000 a year as being about 75% of her $100,000+ / year salary.

    Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - Joe   /  Joseph S. Haas**, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

    -* cc: Ed & Elaine Brown of Marion, Illinois, and Fort Worth, Texas by Corrlinks +

    ** myself a victim of Federal policy over-ride too in contempt of court NOT by Articles 22 + 23, Part 2, N.H. Constitution of up to ten (10) days as applicable to the judiciary that used to be an inferior court withIN the General Court of to a now supposed co-equal branch of government by Article 72-a but using the Fed. policy of that petty offenses being any sentence of LESS than six (6) months of the Federal litigant NOT entitled to a trial by jury! but still if a Seventh (7th) Amendment common law offense, of which Champerty is, as me a Missing Heirs Bounty Hunter for a finder's fee on my location of Missing Heirs for a share of their inheritance of land and mineral rights. The two judges needing to be address/ impeached/ petitioned here for the 120 days damages (by "good time credits" on a sentence of: 5 months, 29 days, 1/3rd off for "good behavior" of 30-10=20 days per each of almost 6 months) in my case being: both James D. O'Neill, III and our former N.H. Attorney General John P. Arnold, soon to retire. My claim being $2,500 per day x 120 days = $300,000 per the formula found in the Veronia Silva case in the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23 State Board of Claims in the mid 1980s that made the front pages of the "Manchester Union Leader". My case of "Free Commercial Speech" per the Beineke case in Vol. 400 Mass. Reports ____(1987), footnote #7, for Bill Devine, Bounty Hunter of Boston, who was profiled in The "Boston Herald" on Sept. 24, 1989 @ page 16 ( or 16 - 24 vice versa). See the the microfilm at the library.

    *** To file a claim with that RSA Ch. 93-B Insurance Company in Keene for this error or omission in his un-faithful performance of duty.

    cc: also to the other Plainfield Rep. ________ who I have not yet talked with, but left a voice recording this morning too. e-mail:_________________  "

[JosephSHaas]

Frank Guinta's phone # in Washington is 202: 225-5456

http://guinta.house.gov/

I did just call to there but got a busy signal. Attn: Jay Ruais.

Of to Impeach George Z. Singal for all those unlawful hearings in Maine !

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Update: I just talked with Jay, and that he says he's gotten a bunch of e-mails from me and he's been "swamped" of to read later and me telling him of the bottom line being of to read that Kansas case found by Danny Riley of not pre-trial as the key word but pre-liminary hearings of withIN a trial as a stage of such, and so Singal holding those hearings in Maine as BOTH unlawful and illegal (6th Amendment and 18USC3232 of OUTside the district) and so to have Frank start the Bill of Impeachment for the trial in the Senate.

[JosephSHaas]

"Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS . . .     566851 . . .  01:18 PM . . . .  "

Mod:   http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?board=1.0

Wow! 567140 - 566851 = 289 views here in less than a day! Say 2:00 p.m. yesterday to 8:00 a.m. today = 10+8 = 18 hours = over 15 per hour, say 12 or 3 visits every 15 minutes, or one every five (5) minutes, thus how many #___ different visitors? or is this one government agent checking in here every five minutes under some monitoring program in his job description 

[JosephSHaas]

Here's a Progress Report from one of the Somersworth Reps:

"From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: N.H. State Rep. ____________
Subject: (typos) RE: [Summary] RE: (Attachment) RE: re-type of Dan Lynch letter. (Ref. 664 Somersworth)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:22:47 -0500

typo corrections, of point(s), partial, maybe and spelling of Houran I think it is with a letter "u", plus the E.K. for Morrill, also: the Articles, and not 92, but 72-a.

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: N.H. State Rep. ____________
Subject: [Summary] RE: (Attachment) RE: re-type of Dan Lynch letter. (Ref. 664 Somersworth)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:49:53 -0500

Thank you Representative ________:

Of the bottom line, like my father used to say, is to have some Rep. or Reps file an Article 40 Bill of Impeachment against the Governor for him not doing his Art. 51 duty of to execute the laws of the state AND the United States, meaning the sword AND the shield of Art. 12 protection, PLUS to impeach the three of five Supreme Court judges for a violation of BOTH laws too, (re: case #2007-0745) of N.H. Article 12 and that of 28USC636(c)(1) too in that they allowed a U.S. Attorney Assistant to PULL a case up to there for a Removal when by another Federal statute ONLY the Defendant can PUSH it to there, not some intervenor /, interloper.

I took Lynch to the State Board of Claims but that they said because he was not the agressor of the Uncle Sam agent who "took over" Elaine Brown's Dental Office in Lebanon, that he of the sword is not responsible, but said nothing of his shield duties, of them appointed by him anyway so I didn't expect much other than a cover-up.  The Feds seized the place, as in to lien it, but have yet to TRY to forfeit it. In the meantime when Ed Brown and his wife DID pay the property taxes, the Feds pay nothing, and it's been vacant with no taxes since Oct. 4, 2007 to now = over 4 years!  You'd think that the possesser would pay that 9/10th as in possession in nine points of the law, and on a 10-point scale, thus 90% and so this entered into the Brown Trust case for a hearing in Fall 2012, but in the meantime there ought to be some State-Federal Relations stuff, and there is with Dan Itse's Bill, of all LSRs to be public on Mon., Dec. 5th according to Karen Wadsworth, your Clerk.

So would you please read all this of which I sent, and agree with me that the Feds through your City with Art. 12 inhabitants without 18USC3232 consent was wrong and also a violation of the 6th Amendment and that somebody has to pay: if not the culprits themselves, then those who could have prevented such as a shield or heard one Danny Riley's appeal from Strafford County Superior Court with that Judge Steve Houran there of from being an Assistant A.G. - you'd think that those type judges would be partial and so to get a different judge.  He never even has a hearing!  Maybe to impeach Houran too! I got out on a Habeas Corpus once, of that Judge Robert E.K. Morrill over-ruled Judge Edwin W. Kelly.  In the old days the policy was to have a hearing withIN 3 days.  Nowadays things have gotten worse! More non-consumer friendly crap from the judicial branch, including their contempt B.S. that is against Articles 22+23 of the N.H. Constitution, Part 2nd as a so-called co-equal branch of government by Art. 72-a in 1966 when they got out from under the GENERAL Court, but give MORE than the max of 10 days.  Of like the creature greater than the Creator! A topsy-turvey, bass-ackwards in-justice is what I call it.

And/or an Article 32 Petition to the new House Grievance Committee, of that I'm waiting for a POA from Ed Brown to arrive in the mail as ALL of them took this route over the Somersworth-Berwich bridge that if it were a toll bridge and I had the authority, I'd stop these Federal agents to see if they have their papers in order that they do not.  Of Bill Gardner of who you voted for to update his Annual Report with this Federal non-filing on Friday.  Bill I've known since the 1970s but when it gets down to brass tacks he's chicken-shit of not to rock the boat.  He presented a partial job description to the G&C and called it an Annual Report of the Secretary of State or accounting of never to have counted the two required papers from that 40USC255 to 3112 Federal agent to the N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 requirement.

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas, grad of UNH 1976. Back when the cost of an education was by the Chevrolet rule, of one car value per year, back then of $2,500 per year x 4 = $10,000. My first vehicle ever was a JEEP CJ5, and 1st car a Chevy Chevelle. Then a blue car, of red, white and blue. (;-) All - American too.

From: N.H. State Rep. ___________
To: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
Subject: RE: (Attachment) RE: re-type of Dan Lynch letter. (Ref. 664 Somersworth)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:45:19 +0000

Dear Mr. Haas
My wife passed on your message to me when I returned home this afternoon.  I have not responded to any of your emails because I could not figure out what you were asking me to do and the emails looked suspiciously like spam or phishing (we get a lot of those on the legislative mail server).
To repeat, it is not clear to me what problem you are having or what action you think I ought to take on your behalf as a member of the N.H. House of Representatives for the City of Somersworth and the Town of Rollinsford.
Sincerely,

______ ________
New Hampshire House Representative,  Somersworth & Rollinsford
__________________  Committee "

[JosephSHaas]

Here's what he thought was one of the "phish"es:

From: josephshaasjr at hotmail.com
To: rogerrberube at hotmail.com; kirsten.larsen at leg.state.nh.us; philip.munck at leg.state.nh.us; dale.spainhower at leg.state.nh.us; dale.sprague at leg.state.nh.us
CC: jay.ruais at mail.house.gov
Subject: FW: [Hodes, the Jew?] (thanks) Report of crime. (RSA Ch. 633:1)
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:01:35 -0500

To: The Five Somersworth State Reps.:

What I would like from you of to Impeach these three N.H. Supreme Court judges is in a CIVIL process in addition to a re-visit to the Strafford County Attorney AFTERward of to THEN see about a CRIMINAL indictment against these Federal kidnappers! Here's a relay of what I did send to Karen for the Somersworth Chief of Police on the morning of Tuesday June 29th of last year: 2010. Of which "investigation" has resulted in what? NOTHING! No comment either way!  Isn't that up to the Grand Jury to decide? Maybe I ought to print this out as a hand-out to give to them for a "Presentment"?

Yours truly, - - Joe Haas

cc: to NEW Federal Rep. Frank Guinta (R) who took over from Democrat Carol Shea-Porter who was worthless! Of Charlie Bass having taken over for Paul Hodes, the so-called Jew, but whose Jewish Federation REFUSED to process my complaint against him: The World Jewish Council (W.J.C.)
From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: kcantrell at somersworth.com
CC: david at binnie2010.com
Subject: RE: [Hodes, the Jew?] (thanks) Report of crime. (RSA Ch. 633:1)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:05:56 -0400

Karen: Progress Report Requested.  Here's my latest on this subject. -- Joe cc: Bill Binnie for Congress (U.S. Senate - N.H.) Next meeting in: ________ on July __, 2010 @ __:___ p.m. to copy this as a handout in writing rather than just a verbal Q&A for the candidate to write on the record that if and when he is elected then my complaint to the subcommittee of the House Judiciary to look into this illegal expenditure of federal funds (my tax money paid into the system by my employer at work) by his signature of an endorsement to get it to be investigated for a public hearing, as Hodes and the others REFUSE to do, as it is our former N.H. Attorney General, Jeffrey R. Howard on the 4th floor of the Warren B. Rudman Building there at 53 Pleasant Street in Concord, N.H. is the one who cut these illegal checks! and that as a brother of the Bar he refuses to impeach his brethren.

Reply #9690 (my actual reply #2695) on page 647 over at: http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.9690 and http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.msg324654#msg324654 to be exact.

"I wonder how long these them-that-say-they-are Jews over at The "Concord Monitor" by Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 will let this truth stand over there before they cover-up for their liar buddy Hodes AGAIN as EVERY time I print something against Hodes it dis-appears:

Re: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/reaching-beyond-the-temple-walls

and: http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/reaching-beyond-the-temple-walls#comment-130204

of: ""Repair the world" is a good imperative*
By JosephSHaas - 06/29/2010 - 8:33 am New

Reference: page #1 of 2 here of: "As a Reform Jew, there's a religious imperative* of tikkun olam - to repair the world," Klein said." * = imperative (page 353) meaning: "1. Expressing a command or plea. 2. Urgent or obligatory." From the Latin word: imperare of: "to prepare against (an occasion)".

That sounds fine, but is only a part of what is "The Rule of Law", a fine ethics plank on the platform of the World Jewish Council (W.J.C. of New York) of which our Federal Rep Paul Hodes belongs to as a Parliamentarian of Congress and who supposedly took the oath to abide by, but when I reported him to there for a violation of such, there is NO investigation.

Yes - to repair, the verb, means: "To betake oneself" [from page 598 of The "American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language" (c)1973)] and betake is defined at page 69 of: "To cause (oneself) to go or move." But when Title 18 U.S. Code Section 3232 restricts that movement of for the accused to be tried and with ALL proceedings withIN the District of where the offense occured, as for example the District of New Hampshire distinct from The District of Maine, both withIN the First Circuit of Boston, then HOW could those hearings in Portland, Maine (before Polish Jew George G. Singal, an immigrant to Maine with his mother and sister, after their departure from Hitler's attrocities during WWII with his father too, but who did not make it to America as did the rest of the family) legally have occured?  They didn't!  The law spells it out in that they SHALL occur here also for the benefit of witnesses, as me an un-called witness on the list for the Ed Brown anti-IRS co-conspirator case.  I reported this to Hodes and Jane Pauly, his office worker called the court where Deputy Dan Lynch told her that CIVIL Rule 72.5 can be applied to this CRIMINAL case for them to waive their rights if they want.  And so Assistant U.S. Attorney Arnold Huftalen tried to get Cirino Gonzalez to sign such a waiver and he refused but was transported over there over the Somersworth-Berwich Bridge.  An intent and the actual landing of WHERE the crime occured.  The Somersworth police investigation such to maybe have a local Maine Bench warrant for these Federalies when next in their baliwick to be arrested for kidnapping! To plead respondeat superior to have their boss answer to the charge of WHY he did violate the law!  In the meantime do-nothing Hodes to have impeached this judge now wants to be a U.S. Senator!?  Does he get the blessing of the local Rabbi? Especially after she reads this. cc: to Bill Binnie, the only other Republican Primary candidate who is not a sister or brother of the Bar membership of attorneys running for the U.S. Senate. Please see to it that this Hodes, whose religious rights by Article 5 of the N.H. Constitution do no further harm to these victims who like the words repair and betake, but not for as far as they were taken by these Federal outlaws! There is a limit."

From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: kcantrell at somersworth.com
Subject: RE: (thanks) Report of crime. (RSA Ch. 633:1)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:00:41 -0400

Thank you.

From: kcantrell at somersworth.com
To: josephshaas at hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Report of crime. (RSA Ch. 633:1)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:57:56 -0400

I have put your email on the Chief's desk.  Have a good weekend.
From: Joseph S. Haas [mailto:josephshaas@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 2:44 PM
To: kcantrell at somersworth.com
Subject: FW: Report of crime. (RSA Ch. 633:1)

Karen: Thank you for the update. Have a nice weekend. -- Joe

From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: spdadmin at ttlc.net
Subject: Report of crime. (RSA Ch. 633:1)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:53:23 -0400

To:
Chief Dean Crombie
Karen Cantrell - Executive Assistant
spdadmin at ttlc.net

Somersworth Police Department
12 Lilac Lane
Somersworth, New Hampshire 03878
603-692-3131 business/dispatch
603-692-2111 fax

http://www.somersworth.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={8A310EE1-A1DE-4F9E-976E-0E23625A595E}

Re:Report of crime. (R.S.A. Chapter 633:1)

Dear Chief:

--Greetings from the King City of Concord to where our governor sits by his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office to Article 51 enforce the laws of both the State and United States* to which he is Article 41 responsible for to protect our Articles 12 + 30 inhabitants (parts 1 + 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution respectfully).

--To wit: Title 18 U.S. Code Section 3232 in that ALL proceedings SHALL be had in the District of WHERE the offense occurred. All means 100% in my book and by RSA Ch. 21:2 and the word "shall" means must as a mandatory requirement, and not "may", plus the fact that the District of New Hampshire in the Federal system is different from The District of Maine, as both are in the First Circuit headquartered in Boston to where is located the First Circuit Court of Appeals: an Article III, Section 1 "inferior Court_ on Congress" in the Legislative Branch of government.

--So WHERE be this 1-8-9 U.S. "judicial tribunal"? to where executive decisions** can be taken for judicial review IS the definition of a republic of which the United States of America is supposed to be by Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution.

--** The executive decision of our Chief Executive Governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton to NOT send a written invitation over to the G.S.A. Landlord of where the Federal Buildings of both the James C. Cleveland and Warren B. Rudman Buildings are located at 53 + 55 Pleasant Street in Concord, N.H. that has this tenant court operating without a license / permission / "Consent"! ***

--*** See RSA Ch. 123:1 of our CONDITIONAL Consent as from 1-8-17 U.S. Const. but that as the U.S. Supreme Court has decided in the Adams case of 1943 an offer of consent un-accepted is NOT consent. So until the Landlord, Martha Johnson of The General Services Administration, as the "head" of "agency" under 40USC255 over to Title 40 U.S. Code Section 3112 files her papers with Bill Gardner's N.H. Office of Secretary of State at 107 North Main Street, The Capitol Building, 2nd floor in Concord, N.H. (cc: to him later AFTER your investigation) AND someHOW the individual entering lawfully and legally withIN their sphere of existence, then they are supposed to have NO jurisdictional authority over us inhabitants who do NOT give our individual consent either! The group consent by the Legislature or General Court in the general to apply to ANY purchase of land being this requirement by the shall word that is a must/ mandatory duty of them to do BEFORE they do more.****

--**** The more as out-laws! Because on October 25th, 2007 @ about 1:00 p.m. U.S. Marshals operating off their turf with one of our inhabitants, named: Daniel-John Riley, did with intent to cross the Somersworth-Berwick Bridge FROM N.H. TO Maine in violation of 18USC3232.  The mere thought of such with motion to act being in this case an RSA Ch. 633:1 Kidnapping because:

  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/633/633-1.htm
    "I. A person is guilty of kidnapping if he knowingly confines another under his control with a purpose to: ...
       (c) Terrorize***** him...; or
       (d) Commit an offense against him...
    II. Kidnapping is a class A felony unless the actor voluntarily releases the victim without serious bodily injury and in a safe place prior to trial, in which case it is a class B felony.
Source. 1971, 518:1. 2001, 230:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2002."

--***** Terrorize = "2. To coerce by intimidation" ["The American Heritage Dictionary of The English Language" (c)1973 @ page 715.] To intimidate = "2. To discourage" (page 374); and discourage (p. 206) = "To...dis-hearten".

--And so when the contract calls for the Feds to be in "Consent" with us, defined at page 154 to be in "agreement" (page 14) from the word agree meaning "2. To be in accord", and the word accord defined at page 5 as from the Latin word "accordare" meaning "to be heart-to-heart with".  So when there is NO Consent, there is no heart, but this dis-hearten-ing, and so terrorism! by the Feds as militants, from the word militate meaning (page 448) "To have force as evidence", when the REAL evidence is Bill Gardner's gold-sealed certificate of Federal non-filing to RSA 123:1 that I had in my hand to give to the Clerk in open court

(as his duty by the definition of a clerk is to record AND take correspondence; there NOT even being a record of this, and so Souter getting an incomplete transcript that I think he'd thank you very much for to do what's needed here to push that along to him down there in Boston, by having the Strafford County Attorney in Dover seek an Indictment or maybe for us to by-pass him to go for an Art. 22 Free Speech hand-outs for them to issue their Presentment, and so to send a copy of this to the Press AFTER you do your investigation and might run into a County stumbling block by block-heads there on the Federal "Take")

but dis-allowed by this judge George Z. Singal of Portland, Maine when in courtroom #4 in Concord, N.H. when I called for a "Point of Order" and was arrested****** but not charged by two of the U.S. Marshals.

--****** Arrested as in "2. To seize and hold by LEGAL authority"? (emphasis ADDed as THAT was what I would have liked to argue in that forum that they have no LEGAL authority!  So no, it was NOT definition #2 at page 39 for the word: arrest, but #1 of "To stop or check*******" as I was stopped; from the word stop (p. 683) as in desist = (page 196) in their "To cease doing something" as in to cease = (page 117) of having them "discontinue" my wanting to continue to expand upon this point of order with barbs protruding like from a ball with spikes, and that although the word cease does mean stop, it from the Latin word cessare of also to delay, as in the battle might have been lost there in courtroom #4 but the war is far from over. And so back to the desist word (p. 196 again) meaning also from the Latin word desistere of a "stand off".

--So when my friends Ed & Elaine Brown plus their friends did their stand-off over in Plainfield, N.H. from January to October 2007 to have to prove their jurisdictional authority to them, they had a perfect "right" to do so, as by Article 10 of the N.H. Constitution to revolt of not defined at page 604 against "authority" as the Feds have no authority, but to be in disgust and abhorrence to them! To disgust (page 207) is to repel (p. 598) is to "1. To drive back; ward off or keep away" as in The NO TRESPASSING signs against government agents acting as outlaws! and "4. To present an opposing force to". Thus the question never asked in this trial of which force was militant v.s. that of having THE evidence! The evidence of Federal non-filing and so their force as unlawful and illegal!  The Marshal to ONLY execute lawful precepts! is written INto his oath. WHERE and WHEN was his executive decision ever made on this?  Was he ever deposed to ask HOW he arrived at his decision?  Isn't his decision up for judicial review in what is supposed to be a republic? WHERE be these judicial courts!? Answer: at the state level. In the criminal court section thereof too. And so to please investigate and prosecute whoever was the driver that day and approximate time of his intent AND doing this illegal act, against 18USC3232 and N.H. RSA Ch. 633:1

Best wishes to you, - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059, e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

******* The word "check" at page 125 is a noun and also a verb.  For the noun it's "1. An abrupt halt or stop." But that I was not moving physically, but standing upon my Point of Order, and to the verb of NOT "To arrest the motion of abruptly" UNLESS you define the motion to mean not the physical movement, but my claim or motion for a Point of Order.  Isn't it Parliamentary Procedure by Roberts Rules of Order and the Ninth Amendment in a Legislative proceeding to have the chairman or judge in this case ASK if anybody would like to second my motion if nobody voluntarily does so, before a vote or opinion be decided by the judge to THEN either hear or dis-miss me as not to allow me to expand upon my Point of Order? I like the check word too because it is also defined as for the noun: "3. A standard of comparison to verify accuracy." As there is case-law that reads that when jurisdiction is challenged that it must be proven.  The burden of proof upon the one asserting such power.  But instead of the burden definition #2 at page 97 of "A responsibility or duty" we have the victims now under the other burden of 1.b. "Something that is difficult to bear."******** The word difficult (p. 200) in their case be "hard" time in the "manage"ment department, but their so-called "correction" at the F.C.I. easy to "satisfy" (p. 624) in their class of a course in what? Government History? IS a requirement in ALL schools across the country, right? Or should be, in that a page of history is worth a volume of logic.  The page I'm referring to is this document of non-filing. For when the Feds do satisfy or "fulfill" or "discharge an obligation" as what "shall" be done, as in definition #4 of: "To conform to the requirements of" then when finally filed one dis-charge deserves another. To drop all charges, case: dis-missed. The inmates are free to go home and sue WHOever is responsible for this! of that ought not to have happened.

******** to "bear" the verb (page 63) defined as: "2. To endure" (page 238) of: "1. To bear with tolerance*********; put up with. 2. To continue in existence; last." From the Latin word: indurare meaning: "to harden one's heart against." So if we want this accord or heart-to-heart between the creator state and the Federal creature, which party is more of a "bear" as in to "10. To exert pressure", that of the Feds or us inhabitants? Our governor ought to ask by a pull that the press of papers be presented to us, and so the pressure by the Feds to NOT these victims but directed to the right place: to "bear out. To prove right; confirm." In the meantime to "bear with.  To be patient with; tolerate." WHO is liable to who? "9.a. To permit of or be liable to: This will bear investigation." The Feds liable (p. 406) "1. Legally obligated; responsible" to file their papers; and "2. Susceptible; subject" to the penalties for not doing so, and especially upon those victims harmed for when they/ the Feds do not play by the rules! To be liable from the Old French word of lier, "to bind" them who are "Legally obligated" and not those others!! Back to the bear word again for the verb of also: "11. To proceed (in a specific direction). The direction here of NOT across state lines, but in the northerly direction from their place south of the State House.  To do that first BEFORE anything else! The else being out-of-order and in this case a crime!

********* tolerence (page 727) but before that of back to the word heart (p. 329) of: "3.b. The essence: the heart of the problem". And so THE problem (page 561) being that my "Point of Order" or "question put forward for consideration or solution" was not even considered (p. 154) from the word consider = "1. To deliberate upon; examine. 2. To think or deem. 3. To believe; judge." From the Latin word considerare of: "to observe" (p. 492) "1. To perceive; take notice." of WHO or WHAT? me or the paper? or both? Animal, Vegetable, or Mineral?  The one human being of the animal holding the vegetable matter of the paper document getting "watch"ed is another definition of the word "observe", that likewise has definition #4 of: "To say: make a comment." NOT a command for the removal of the animal with paper so that those he sought to help can be transported to within the mineral! BUT this Latin word just the source as in the trunk of a tree with branches and leaves. The Tree of Liberty without branches and leaves?  How disgusting! To "deem" (p. 188 not having much in this dictionary, and so over to The "New Century Dictionary" (c)1952 @ page 388 of several more words of: to administer, ordain, or regard.) Now back to the Heritage Dictionary again, for these words: to administer (p. 9) defined as either to manage or dispose.  The judge deciding to do the latter, but that only after regard (p. 594) of to TAKE into account.  Did he take what I presented for delivery? No. The "problem" (p561) of this "source of trouble or annoyance" to their status quo, I should have done by the Greek word for trouble being problema of the "thing thrown forward", projection. Yes the judge was "observant" but only per dictionary definition #1 of: "Quick to perceive or apprehend; alert." that their status quo was being rocked. I prefer definition #2 of: "Diligent in observing a LAW, custom, duty, etc." (emphasis ADDed for the law versus what is customarily done there). See also the word: observance being: "The act of observing or complying with something prescribed, as a law or custom."  So to comply with RSA 123:1. Concluding with back to the word tolerance meaning: of beyond "1. The capacity for or practice or recognizing and respecting the opinions, practices, or behavior of others." to in this case: "2. Leeway for variation, as from a standard. 3. The capacity to endure hardship, pain, etc."  So WHO is inflicting this hardship? The Feds! Should we tolerate this variation from the standard in this case being: The Rule of Law? Hell no! My ancestors fought for these rights we are supposed to have today and when I see them being taken away/ stolen, I say: STOP: THIEF! Instead "they" stop be! but that The Truth Goes Marching On.  Over to the cemetery this "Memorial Day", and then to the steps of the courthouse where the Grand Jury does meet for indictments (with the help of the County Attorney), or when he is in cahoots with the Feds, then to them as for to render a "Presentment". They next meet on June ___, so to please get back to me that you've shared this with the County Attorney's Office, and that __________ is to seek such an Indictment, or else, if not, then we can petition the judge to present our own case for them to issue a Presentment. "

[DonnaVanMeter]

Is There a Sliver of Hope for the Browns, Cirino, Danny and Jason?
A recent article came out earlier this week about Sheriffs finally standing up to Federal goons. I sent this article to some of my favorite people, whom happen to be behind the prison walls. These folk should had been protected by the local Sheriff from the Federal jack booted thugs.
Here is the article sent...

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/11/14/u-s-sheriffs-rise-up-against-federal-government-sheriff-threatens-feds-with-swat-team/

Here are the responses of Ed and Elaine Brown on said article.

Donna,
I love this.  This is what we have been saying for years.  We and  many of our friends have told Sheriff Prozzo (our county sheriff at home) this, but he refused to listen.  Did you send this to Ed?  Do you send these info bits to both of us?  If so, I don't need to keep asking you.
I have been in touch with Sheriff Mack.  He has twice sent me his book, and both times it has been rejected by the prison: it would contribute to the disruption of the orderly running of the prison.  Typical federal attempts to hide the truth.  Why else to reject a sheriff's writings?
I'm going to make copies and send this to others.-
Thanks again, keep this good stuff coming.
Love and blessings,
Elaine
Ps. I forgot in  the last message: even Jack McLamb tried to tell Sheriff Prozzo this, but Prozzo would not take the call.  Jack tried several times.
So much for Prozzo.

Dear Donna:
     Hurray!! At last. We have been waiting for this for
four years. This is one of the indicators of the blaze of
liberty that has already begun to spread. God is in the
play. The orchastra is warmed up. The actors are on their
marks. The play now begins. We each watch in our own
areas who takes what side. Constitutional Republic or
a National Socialist Democracy. The Union must stand.
America First.
Thanks Donna
See you soon.
Ed...end


Dear Ed and Elaine
I have sent this to everyone I could except for Jason which the FBOP has our communication with one another blocked, but I am sure if someone can get it to him, that he would be glad to see it.
I remember calling Prozzo's office quite a bit on your all's behalf. Expressing my concerns and informing him of what his responsibilities are as a Sheriff. OF course it fell on deaf ears.
The day of the raid, when I stepped out of the shower and opened our bedroom door to be greeted with  Federal funded guns up in my face, after yelling at the agents to stop beating Cirino, the next few things out of my mouth were, Where is the warrant and to the locals I told them they have the power of jurisdiction, that the feds were in the wrong and it was their job to protect us from them!
Seeing such news warms my heart. I hope it develops into something that everyone can benefit from and secures an early release for all of you. At least its a start!
love you all!
Donna

[JosephSHaas]

Is There a Sliver of Hope for the Browns, Cirino, Danny and Jason?

Donna: Thanks again. -- Joe
This just sent by Corrlinks to Ed & Elaine plus Danny and Reno.
Keith got it by e-mail relay of over to Jason.
"Subject: "sliver of hope"
E&E + D + R:
Here's a copy and paste:
I pressed the return button by mistake and so posted two replies: the first Maine word ought to be: Bridge.
"Like · · Unfollow Post · Share

        Joseph S Haas Thank you Donna for posting this info here at: http://www.facebook.com/notes/damn-vanmeter/is-there-a-sliver-of-hope-for-the-browns-cirino-danny-and-jason/10150366559346691 and of both Ed & Elaine's replies. Plus another excuse for Mike Prozzo not attending that May Day 2007 meeting I had scheduled for this Article 12 "protection" with the Sullivan County Commissioners was that he went on a Sheriff's vacation. - - - - - The current Sheriff stands across America are for "State's Rights" so-called, of which State Rep. Dan Itse here in Freedom, New Hampshire has an LSR for a House Bill #_____ in 2012 for to deal with, as will be on the State website Monday, December 5th for the first time as for ALL LSRs to be given their HB#s. - - - - - What I'd like to see is similar penalties put into his bill to those monetary fines like in the Posse Comitatis Act of 1878, of when state or Federal officials do "militate" (defined as the use of force as evidence OVER that of the evidence, like for here in N.H. of there being NO 1-8-17 Federal filing to N.H. RSA Chapter 123:1 that their use of military force withOUT proper authority, like in an Act of Congress, can subject them to have to pay over $x amount to the victims through the House Grievance Committee since the courts REFUSE to check-and-balance this corruption! Re: Danny Case #2007-0745 at the N.H. Supremes where they allowed the Assistant U.S. Attorney to intervene and PULL the case to there for a Removal AND Dismissal, when the Federal statute even says that ONLY the Defendant can PUSH it to there and by 28USC636(c)(1) ONLY when both sides "consent"! Of the 3 of 5 Supremes of: Dalianis, Duggan and Hicks needing to be impeached! cc: of this over to Kat at the NH UNDERGROUND for others to read, as the Ed Brown v.s. evil I.R.S. chapter there has been getting a hit ever 5 minutes on average through out the last few days. See: starting at page 663 = http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.9930 to the current 664 leading toward the infamous: page 666. There being two groups of State Reps in Lebanon and over in Somersworth for the notorious Somersworth-Berwick, Maine travels to Maine on this N.H. case
        Is there a sliver of hope for the Browns, Cirino, Danny and Jason?
        A recent article came out earlier this week about Sheriffs finally standing up ...See More
        By: Damn VanMeter
        12 minutes ago · Like ·
        Joseph S Haas ?...preparing documents for to Article 32 Petition by House Rule 36 endorsement regarding the theft of Ed's filing fee in case #2005-C-033 in Grafton County Superior Court in North Haverhill, N.H. and to impeach Judge Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hope) Burling, and dissolve her Article 36 retirement, plus: more State Reps. in Manchester on N.H. Congressman Frank Guinta's home turf seeking to Article 40 impeach Gov. John H. Lynch of Hopkinton for NOT executing the laws of the state AND of the United States of BOTH, by his Article 51 duty for which he is Article 41 responsible for, and that includes the sword AND the shield of this Article 12 "protection"! Lynch having change the "and" word to an "or" word and thus a violation of his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office to Article 14 "completeness"!
        3 minutes ago · Like
    Write a comment... "

[JosephSHaas]

"Here's a re-type:
. . .
November 14, 2011 . . . . "

Here's a re-type:

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
55 PLEASANT STREET, ROOM 110
CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-3941

OFFICE OF THE CLERK
James R. Starr, Clerk of Court
Daniel J. Lynch, Chief Deputy Clerk

Telephone: 603-225-1423
Web: www.nhd.uscourts.gov

November 16, 2011

Joseph S. Haas, Jr.
PO Box 3842
Concord, NH 03302-3842

Re: Telephone Requests for Information/Request for Information on Public Comments

Dear Mr. Haas:

--I am writing in response to your telephone call in which you request information on all public comments made to the proposed amendments to the local rules.

--Unfortunately, we do not publicly distribute or disclose public comments to proposed local rule amendments.  Thus, I cannot comply with your request.

--Additionally, and consistent with my previous letter to you dated November 14, 2011, you are informed that all requests for information, as well as any other comments directed to my attention, shall be submitted in writing by paper format and not by telephone, email or in person at the courthouse.  Again, as I said in my prior letter, any such written requests that are unreasonable, nonsensical and designed to harass or otherwise burden staff for your personal pleasure or amusement will go without response and I will not reply to emails or telephone calls.

Sincerely,
Daniel J. Lynch
Chief Deputy Clerk
DJL/ "

[JosephSHaas]

She* must be a mole for "Uncle Sam" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mole_%28espionage%29 to rat out her RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office, as I did receive a voice mail from her on Wednesday afternoon at about 2:00 p.m. as listened to yesterday (Thu., Nov. 17th) of that she, on the State-Federal Relations Committee, REFUSES to get involved with this relation. 

Isn't that a part of her job description!? To deal with State-Federal relations.

So far of the five Somerworth Reps, I've only heard back from her and another one as indicated above, plus what of the other three?

Hey! They already took their $100 per year pay and now don't want to do the work!?  Her giving this excuse as a member of THAT Committee is just plain ridiculous!

Another one of the other Reps in Somersworth being on this SAME committee, plus the other three of on: the Criminal Justice Committee, the Municipal and County Government Committee, and the Public Works and Highways Committee; all so appropriate here as involving these Federal criminals on the highway in THAT city! See what one of the COPs did write to me as being dealt with by an LSR #____ to HB No. ______ in 2012 dealing with this "under color of law" excuse.

* 2. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376963
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/members/member.aspx?member=376963

"Representative Kirsten Larsen Schultz (r) Strafford- District 02  Seat #:2034
New Home Address: 219 West High Street, Somersworth, NH  03878-1526
Phone: (603)785-8415 Email: kirsten.larsen at leg.state.nh.us
STATE-FEDERAL RELATIONS AND VETERANS AFFAIRS
Position: Clerk    Telephone:    271-3554"                     JSH