Main thread for Ed and Elaine Brown vs the evil IRS

[JosephSHaas]

From: josephshaas at hotmail.com
To: Jose, Donna, Bill, Keith and David
Subject: FW: First Draft Complaint to Executive Branch Ethics Committee against: Gov. John H. Lynch
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:35:47 -0500

I think that I'll copy this 6-page print-out at 5-cents a page = 30-cents + 44-cents postage = 74-cents to each of them by mail within a #10 envelope, rather than to burden them with having to read this at a cost of 5-cents a minute, or 15-cents each page x 6 = 90-cents at the 100% level, of to thus save 16-cents each, or maybe to send them some more money to commissary.  Anyway of to send this by Corrlinks to them, of to just speed-read for now, because once I file it, I canNOT talk about it under threat of being charged with a misdemeanor, of Class A for jail time, or B of fine only conviction possible, the statute doesn't say which, and so not to even get in that predicament. -- "God's Speed" as they say. - - Joe P.S. The point being also to that of if you have anything more for me to add to this, of my complaint against Lynch in the right place or forum now, would you please let me know. Of I feel likle Thomas Edison with all those thousands of experiments before finally landing in that SAME building of where justice is supposed to PREvent this crap, NOT to have to reprimand AND $compensate AFTER the fact, but then you all wouldn't be $  mult-millionaires $ if you hadn't gone to this 4-year "school" being a FULL-time student, and now onto a graduate degree! (;-)

From: josephshaas at hotmail dot com
To: ethics at doj.nh.gov
CC: gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; ingbretson_studio at yahoo.com; dan at mcguire4house.com; betts24 at gmail.com; tim_comerford at yahoo.com; andrew at andrewmanuse.com; itsenh at comcast.net; greg.sorg at leg.state.nh.us; carol at mcguire4house.com; khawkins2 at comcast.net; lcvita2 at earthlink.net; john.sytek at leg.state.nh.us; lawrence.perkins at leg.state.nh.us; paul.brown at leg.state.nh.us; randall.whitehead at leg.state.nh.us; jean.jeudy at gmail.com; rcday2 at comcast.net; libertynh at myfairpoint.net; peter.hansen at leg.state.nh.us; reppbs at ttlc.net; dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us; calvin.pratt at leg.state.nh.us; spec.bowers at leg.state.nh.us; mark.proulx at leg.state.nh.us; maurice.pilotte at leg.state.nh.us; ~houseexecutivedepartmentsandadministration at leg.state.nh.us; dr-t aty comcast.net; jay.ruais at mail.house.gov; jackd at nhbfa.com; miked at nhbfa.com
Subject: First Draft Complaint to Executive Branch Ethics Committee against: Gov. John H. Lynch
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:16:25 -0500

To:
Executive Branch Ethics Committee
33 Capitol Street
Concord, NH 03301-6397
Phone: 603-271-1238
Ethics@doj.nh.gov

http://doj.nh.gov/ethics-committee/

Members of the Executive Branch Ethics Committee are: Joseph DiBrigida, Jr., Chairman; Dale S. Kuehne; Alan W. Johnson; James A. Normand (former Executive Councilor & an attorney); Patricia B. Quigley; Andrew R. Schulman; One Vacant Position.

"The regular meeting of the Executive Branch Ethics Committee is held on the first Wednesday of every Month starting at 8:00 A.M., at the Attorney General's Office, 33 Capitol Street Concord, New Hampshire." http://doj.nh.gov/ethics-committee/schedule.htm

To please put this on the Agenda for your next meeting on Wed., February 1st, 2012.  My job is on the 2nd shift at work and so when may I appear later that morning? __:__ o'clock a.m. after your 8:00 A.M. "starting" time to like maybe go into executive session to see what questions you can ask me, that I will try to answer to the best of my knowledge and belief, under an affirmation please rather than to swear, as per my right by Article 5 of the N.H. Constitution, Part First & Bill of Rights.

Re: First Draft COMPLAINT against: Governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton, N.H.

COMPLAINANT:
Joseph S. Haas
P. O. Box 3842
Concord, N.H. 03302
603: 8948-6059
JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

AGAINST:

John H. Lynch, Governor
107 North Main Street
Concord, N.H. 03301

Date and Time of Violation: being within 24 hours after: June 21st, 2007 @ 4:29 p.m. (for non-"prompt"* action)
* prompt = without delay
delay = post-pone
post = after
pone = meal

1. of this under "The Continuing Violation Doctrine" of an on-going violation, of since the Feds have seized the real estate (land and buildings) but have yet to attempt a forfeiture of said right, title, and interest of these individuals in the properties, of my friends, who will give me yet another Direct Power of Attorney, (P.O.A.) or at least acting under Ed Brown's Authorization to me to conduct an Inventory of his property therein in Plainfield AND Lebanon since the prior Abatement requests in 2011 were denied, and so now onto that the Tax Collector "may" RSA Ch. 80:8 distrain   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/V/80/80-8.htm  the property, as in the "moving" doors to both places, to re-place with another PRIVATE door and lock with key, at each location, as the Feds have paid NO property taxes, like they are supposed to pay for Concord too, as by RSA 123:2  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-2.htm from:  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm  only their "land" is exempt, but not their buildings of there and at Manchester too, since "possession is nine points of the law" or 90% on a ten-point scale, BUT that of the Insurance Companies policies requiring a 100% ownership, of thus the damages from this non-  pro-tection from the lien is an attachment is a taking of at least the equity from which $money could have been borrowed from a bank by loan to pay a PRIVATE attorney in both the CIVIL and CRIMINAL cases, since there were no mortgages on either place, AND this pro-tection in the future tense from any attempt by "Uncle Sam" to TRY to forfeit! Of to have a record of AGAINST the governor here for what he was supposed to do then (past tense), and so as to pre-vent more corruption under a State-Federal "Protection Racket" in the future, of by this Article 28-a political sub-division of the state. http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html

Location of Violation(s): being: Plainfield, N.H.(and Lebanon, N.H. too)

2. The basis of this complaint: is that after a brush-off from: both (1) the Sullivan County Commissioners    http://www.sullivancountynh.gov/  at their May Day 2007 meeting with them, as pre-sceduled of me on the agenda dealing with the payment to them of their slice of the property tax pie paid for by the Browns in full for Article 12 protection from "other laws" never "Consent"ed to, of who I did ask for Sheriff Mike Prozzo to attend, but that he refused as instead to conveniently take his vacation that day and time, and (2) the Lebanon City Council,    http://www.lebnh.net/   in Grafton County, who I did meet with, as pre-scheduled for to talk during the Public Comment section at 7:45 p.m. that I did of shortly after the 7:30 p.m. start of Article 8 instructing them to please Article 12 "protect" Elaine Brown's rights, title and interest of her person, real estate and effects at her dental office building at Glen Road from Federal agents using "other laws" of the U.S. Code and Statutes at Large against ANY of us Article 12 inhabitants in-cluding the Browns as having paid the property taxes there in full, but which copy of: Notice of non "Consent" to 1-8-17 of the U.S. Constitution  and Order for not to participate by any "Protection Racket" with the Feds went in one ear and out the other that night of June 6th 2007 of the day before the Federal raid on the property the next day of June 7th, 2007 resulted to on June 20th I did visit with Ed & Elaine Brown at their residence at Center of Town Road in Plainfield, Sullivan County, New Hampshire   http://www.plainfieldnh.org/   with others having met there including Randy Weaver  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Weaver  [ photo of him with Ed at Ed's porch at:  http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/05L1euR6qd6lH/610x.jpg&imgrefurl=http://bureaucrash.com/2009/02/19/a   ] from "Ruby Ridge"   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge and Cirino Gonzalez from Texas who did also sign the 1-page Petition that I had typed up and addressed to the governor, and did (A) TRY to deliver first to the Plainfield Board of Selectmen that night of June 20th as on the agenda there too, but was arrested on that "Wise Up of Die" case warrant  http://www.wmur.com/r/13543893/detail.html  from the Lebanon P.D. and so had my friend Bernie Bastian deliver same copy of the certificate of non-filing by the Feds what I was to give to them as can be seen over at this video:    http://www.yotube.com/watch?v=ZZYAyqVbDvY [ 10:13 minutes seen 5,835 times ]  and (B) did deliver my signed copy of the Petition thereof to the governor's office receptionist the following day, June 21st @ exactly 4:29 p.m. to "prompt"ly* act upon it, to "protect" the Browns, since the governor's duty is to BOTH execute [ * ] the laws of the state AND the United States of for the shield of Article 12 "protection" AND the sword of Uncle Sam, but the latter ONLY when so approved as "Consent"ed to but that was NOT as evidenced by the Certificates of Federal non-filing to RSA Ch. 123:1  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm  from Bill Gardner, the N.H. Secretary of State,  http://www.sos.nh.gov/  of from the first gold-sealed certificate obtained by me on September 10th, 2001 while helping my friend Andy Tempelman and his wife Priscilla and their son to fight the I.R.S. and U.S. Marshals too down in Milford, N.H. for their "Ram in the Thicket" Restaurant, as the Marshals presumably KNEW then and do KNOW now that a CONDITIONAL Offer of "Consent" (as in ours of here in N.H. from June 14, 1883) un-accepted is NOT consent per the Adams case as spelled out in their own U.S. Attorney Manual 664  http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm  as each state is different in their requirements upon "Uncle Sam" to have to register to do business withIN their state,  [ see:  http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm thanks to Attorney Lowell "Larry" Becraft, from Huntsville, Alabama, who I've known about since the F. Tupper Saussy   http://www.tuppersaussy.com/ days back in the early 1980s of both his best-selling book of: "The Miracle on Main Street" and his monthly "Main Street Journal" from Swanee, Tennessee.] of for example to have to, by the "shall" word, file with the N.H. Secretary of State here in New Hampshire, as compared to that of to the governor in Florida, of NEITHER done, and so no jurisdictional authority for the Feds to operate by force of militant action of that word militate meaning force as evidence over THIS evidence of non-filing, but that of which he/ the governor on numerous occasions of me before the G&C too of The Governor & Council TRYing to get them to advise or counsel him too, of he FAILed and REFUSED to honor his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm   to Article 51 of the N.H. Constitution [ * ]    http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html   for which he "shall be" held Article 41 "responsible for the faithful execution of the laws" but wasn't, as he changed the "and" word in Article 51 to an "or" word! and as I did take him to the RSA Ch. 541-B:1-23  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-LV-541-B.htm  State Board of Claims, but that in their Order #2010-036 of August 8, 2011 because the statute reads that of he had to be the one who "caused" the damages with the letter "d" of to MAKE the wrong, they "dismissed" my claim with P.O.A. for the Browns and sent me on my way to here of for what he did "cause" as NOT by an overt act or commission, BUT this omission of to "protect". Of to please reprimand so that a Governor's Warrant may be obtained for Ed Brown of Marion, Illinois

3. (BTW who is NOT . . . being Article 18 N.H. rehabilitated in an F.C.I. of taking a course with #x-number of classes in the subject matter of liens to taxes by the Writ of Elegit process of to offer up to a "moiety" amount of  half / 1/2 fifty (50%) percent of the apples of the tree, or crop, be it in the urban or rural setting, only until AFTER [ ** ] the tax has been declared a debt by civil process, and in a trial by jury when over $1500 in N.H. is in dispute by Article 20 N.H. Bill of Right as Ed claimed in Case #2005-C-033 in Grafton County Superior Court   http://www.courts.state.nh.us/courtlocations/grafsupedir.htm  in North Haverhill, N.H. against the Feds  but that was illegally Removed & Dismissed by Clerk Robert. B. Muh AND Judge Jean K. (Mrs. Peter Hoe Burling) which was against the Feds' own Title 28 U.S. Code 636(c)(1) in needing the "consent" of BOTH parties!! that ought to get her Article 17 impeached   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/house.html  and tried by the Senate per Article 38   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/senate.html  to have her Article 36 yearly pension  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html   taken away from her!  [ ** ]  and THEN in the criminal realm for theft if and when not turned over, and until the debt be paid; supposed to be "correct"ed in a Federal Correctional Institution, with complaints of my tax-payer money going to pay C.T.U. teachers of the H.S. to merely shuffle papers as administrators but falling on the deaf ears of Federal Rep. Frank Guinta of Manchester,   http://guinta.house.gov/  getting a courtesy copy of this First Draft e-mail, with invitation to attend the Feb. 1st meeting, as after I file this I cannot tell anybody about it unless the confidentiality be waived by the governor who ought to do so and especially because of House Bill 1476   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2012/HB1476.html  from:  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/lsr_search/LSR_Results.aspx   set for a Public Hearing on this subject matter on ______, ____, 2012 @ __:__ o'clock a.m. / p.m. in Room #306 of the L.O.B. for The ED&A Committee    http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H07    271-3319 for both: Karen Karwocki, Secretary and Pam Smarling, Researcher. . . BUT that he is merely warehoused there, fed not this information to his brain by them for  education and learning of his supposed deficiencies, but food to his body for to produce excrement to the local sewage lagoon, of this crap has got to stop! Literally!)

4. to attend that BTLA Board of Tax & Land Appeals http://www.nh.gov/btla/   case this Fall 2012 after his mandatory meeting by Rule with the Selectmen this Spring or Summer like on the "steps" is the definition of the word "parley", and/or to send in the peacemakers. Of in my Boscawen case of the B.O.S. having Ordered by private contractor to and they did remove my steps, and so resulting in some Peace Officer to relay whatever RSA Ch. 21-J:14-b,I(a) "Guidelines",  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/I/21-J/21-J-14-b.htm    there be, if any, as yet another complaint to file with you here against the Dept. of Revenue on my case too if the Commissioner doesn't correct the wrongs there, as alerted to him in writing as presented to his receptionist there this past Wed., Jan. 4th @ exactly 8:12 a.m. See House Bill #1266  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2012/HB1266.html  of trying to change their duty by guidelines to a mere "standard".

5. To reprimand the governor, in a PUBIC condemnation of maybe to return x% of his RSA Ch. _____ salary too, for his un-faithful performance of duty, least he be Article 40 impeached   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/senate.html  along WITH his advisers giving him lousy advise, if any, of his Executive Councilors to be Article 63 impeached   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/council.html  , of that $amount, if not turned back into the Treasury, result in yet another complaint by me upon his RSA Ch. 93-B http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-VI-93-B.htm   bond to that Insurance Company in Keene.

6. Names and phone numbers of witnesses or other victims: being The Executive Councilors http://www.nh.gov/council/   who did witness both in Concord and Portsmouth at their fortnightly G&C meetings on several occasions my disgust of during the ONLY public participation allowed being of during the Public Hearing phase of for the BFA/ Business Finance Authority  http://www.nh.gov/btla/ of condemning them all of being out-of-order by "Roberts Rules of Order", by accepting certificates from Jack Donovan, The Executive Director 415-0101 and/or his Senior Credit Officer Mike Donahue @ 415-0192  http://www.nhbfa.com/BFA_Contact_Staff.html BEFORE dealing with the Sept. 10, 2001 Original Certificate and more.  Them being: (1) Raymond S. Burton, http://www.nh.gov/council/district1/ 603: 747-3663 (home); 271-3632 (office) + 481-0863 (car); (2) Dan St. Hilaire http://www.nh.gov/council/district2/index.html cell: 603: 568-5515; (3) Chris Sununu http://www.nh.gov/council/district3/index.html home office: 603: 658-1187; (4) Ray Wieczorek http://www.nh.gov/council/district4/ home office: 624-1655, cell: 345-0304; and (5) David Wheeler http://www.nh.gov/council/district5/ home office: 672-6062; plus: former Executive Councilors: Ruth Griffin, Bernie Streeter, Deborah Pignatelli, and John Shea.

State Statute or Ethics Code you believe was violated (if known): being his RSA Ch. 92:2 oath of office!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302; Telephone 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com , being (1) on the witness list in the co-conspirators case in that Federal case involving Dan Riley of New York and others that were supposed to have preliminary hearings NOT in Portland, Maine as ordered by Judge Stephen McAuliffe and/or his assigned Judge George Z. Singal of Maine, by the direct or in-direct, who was too lazy to travel over to here at the Warren B. Rudman Block at 53-55 Pleasant Street, in Concord, N.H. BUT did violate BOTH the legal and lawful of the statutes AND constitution TOGETHER in that such hearings are a PART of the trial and that unless the defendants did waive their rights by 18USC3232 as attempted to do by Assistant U.S. Attorney Arnold Huftalen to Reno Gonzalez in that written waiver presented to him that he REFUSED to sign, then ALL trials "shall" be in the state AND district of where the offense occurred! as is supposed to be a guarantee by the Sixth (6th) Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that this governor swore to honor the laws of the United States too! Of that one of his subordinates, under his appointed Attorney General Kelly Ayotte, before Michael Delaney, of one: Paul; Broder, investigator, told me that we live in the First Judicial Federal "District", but that I had to correct him in that we live withIN the Federal District of New Hampshire as with a border to Maine, of that state too withIn the First Judicial "Circuit".  Of that he called me back months later to correct, but that of nothing received in writing, nor were any of the victims under such "mistake" $ compensated, as yet for this wrong. Of the going - rate being $2,500 per day damages based upon the Veronica Silva case in the State Board of Claims back in the mid 1980s that made the front pages of "The UNION LEADER" with the help of her attorney, Andru Volinsky who got 20% ( 1/5th) of her then to $25,000 max of thus $5,000 to him, since increased to $50,000 within the Board, or on appeal by RSA Ch. ______ to the jury for almost a million dollars, since the maximum withIN the Board is by RSA Ch. 541-B:14 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LV/541-B/541-B-14.htm   = "I. All claims arising out of any single incident against any agency for damages in tort actions shall be limited to an award not to exceed $475,000 per claimant and $3,750,000 per any single incident...."

And (2) wanting to keep up-to-speed of what was going on with the case, a victim too as a member of the public for what was supposed to be an Article 14 "complete" and "public trial" withIN the state but with my travel bill for cost and time to and at plus from N.H. to Maine and back presented as a bill to the judge's clerk in Portland, but that he REFUSED to pay, and so me out around $500.00 that day, plus I did report these illegal and unlawful takings of pay from the checking account of First Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, our former N.H. Attorney General, who is now with his office on the 4th Floor of the Rudman Block dishing out these thousands of dollars worth of checks to his buddies of The Bar Association!   http://www.nhbar.org/  of when I did post an internet idea of maybe to put a "Citizen's Arrest" on him one of these days, two F.B.I. agents came sneaking around to the back of my house one morning to ask me if I was serious, of which I said yes: but not without police back-up, of the goons I've dealt with like N.H. Safety Commissioner Barthelmes   http://www.nh.gov/safety/commissioner/index.html  and his goon: David Cargil, now the U.S. Marshal for N.H. and who I tried to start an "Ed Brown Protection Fund" with with a one ($1.00) dollar bill, said: no, as he spent five ($5.00) dollars in postage to return it to me by certified mail.  Of this was about the time Dan Riley had filed that Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in Strafford County Superior Court in Dover against Jail Superintendant Warren Dowaliby for Article 14 "complete"ness too as for a hearing within three day was (past tense) the previous policy for Article 91  http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html  but since changed to NO such hearing(s) now when their Federal buddies are involved, [ and the Judge Stephen Houran there used to be with the N.H. A.G's office too, and so a violation of Article 35 of the N.H. Constitution! for he was not impartial!] as they make money on inmates there and in Merrimack County in Boscawen as the only two contracts with the Feds in the state to house inmates from a charge of around $100.00 per day, reminding me how really bad they are from what one of our Founding Fathers said of: " If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom — go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!     http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Samuel_Adams  Of Danny Riley having appealed his case to the N.H. Supremes as case #2007-0745, but that when an Assistant U.S. Attorney did Intervene with an Order to have it Removed to Federal Court for a Dismissal, they of the five judges ( Broderick, Duggan, Dalianis, Nadeau and Hicks) KNOWing or supposed to know that only the Defendant can PUSH it to there of NOT to be PULLed to there, they allowed it anyway against their own U.S. Code, and by 28USC636(c)(1) also, as without "consent" from BOTH parties!! Broderick, Duggan and Nadeau having since retired, leaving Dalianis as the Chief now with Hicks, as joined by Lynn and Conboy, with a vacancy to fill, and so a copy of this First Draft to the Councilors now BEFORE the official filing so that during the Public Hearing on WHOever I can ask that the Councilors ask him or her if they will honor their oath to the ENTIRE laws and not just SOME, as done by these creeps who need to be impeached! Of there not yet any indication of when that will occur. See:   http://www.nh.gov/council/publichearing.html   for any update.

Concluding with the following so as to be complete and the reason for WHY this complaint is filed by me being that when I see a wrong I report it!  Unlike these attorneys under an RSA Ch. 311:6 oath   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/XXX/311/311-6.htm of they see it but don't report it! Or that they do report what they "think" is wrong, but that when it's discovered that what they reported might hurt one or some of the judges, the officer filing such does a cover-up and quits so as to start the RSA Ch. 625:8,III(b) 2-year run from being prosecuted too!  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/625/625-8.htm   of that being Jim DeHart of the P.C.C. / N.H. Supreme Court's Professional Conduct Committee http://www.courts.state.nh.us/committees/attydiscip/index.htm  of  when Attorney David Hugh Bownes of Laconia filed charges against Portsmoth Attorney Sven Wiberg, and Joshua Gordon, Esquire too of Concord for Briefing this Adams case of 1943 from the U.S. Supreme Court in their Appeal to Boston, AND presumably AFTER reading my report of this at:
http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.msg326175#msg326175
being Reply #9723 on page 649 of Aug. 3, 2010 @ 3:45 p.m. over at The New Hampshire Underground website;
they did the cover-up.  Just like the Feds close their eyes to the fact that there is no Enforcement Clause withIN the 16th Amendment for these un-uniform taxes, as compared to the 1-8-1 uniform ones in the U.S. Constitution, AND "them" of putting the emphasis on the second part of the phrase of: "to lay and collect", when it's the first party of the word lay can mean or be defined as either to apply or impose. And so I tell people of if you want to be under a George Orwellian "Nineteen Eighty Four" "Doublespeak" system that's YOUR choice, but not mine, as I said in my court case there back in 1983 as #M.83-50-D for Shane Devine, the Chief Judge of when Martin J. "Red" Beckman was here running for President and, who with Otto Skinner's book too, exposed this section (5) of the Internal Revenue Code for rents as unlawful too! but that McAuliffee told the Ed Brown jury that ALL of the Code was lawful! that was either a bald-face lie, or him ignorant of the truth, but that his Deputy Clerk Dan Lynch refused to enter in my Notice of Error since I was not a party to the case other than as an un-called witness.  To impose is to levy or collect, and so what? To collect and collect!? using double talk!? Not me: I say to lay means to apply as in a request and say: Request: DENIED!

[JosephSHaas]

. . .   [ the people ] . . .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://newsinfo.nd.edu/for-the-media/nd-experts/faculty/stuart-greene/
. . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivien_Kellems
. . .
http://guinta.house.gov/ . . . .

Mother Angelica (Cable TV Channel 68 here) says     to watch: CNBC's "The American Tax Cheat" that repeats next at 8:00 o'clock p.m. on Cable TV Channel 44 here in New England.

Of I saw the last half with Ed & Elaine this past weekend and wrote to Professor Greene earlier this week, but that I guess him a deadbeat, too lazy, or on vacation, and maybe "out to lunch" altogether, of there is some comment button over at: http://www.cnbc.com/id/42192642 if anybody's interested.

Joe

[DonnaVanMeter]

Political Prisoner Daniel Riley Attacked!
http://youtu.be/IZM6tb1ChY8

[JosephSHaas]

Political Prisoner Daniel Riley Attacked!
http://youtu.be/IZM6tb1ChY8

typo?  I tried without the dot for youtube, but still nothing.

Maybe: http://defiantforyou.com/?p=1090 of 2:16 minutes.

See also:

http://cirinogonzalez.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/political-prisoner-daniel-riley-attacked/

[Tom Sawyer]

Political Prisoner Daniel Riley Attacked!

The link was posted as ftp. All that is necessary when posting youtube video is to put the address, the forum automatically does the rest.

[DonnaVanMeter]

Thanks Tom!

[JosephSHaas]

"Thanks, I did just send to Ed & Elaine Brown through Corrlinks of her the dentist who Uncle Sam put out of business giving these grasshoppers her vehicles and earnings, of the spiders now taking over the house.  -- Joe
cc: her son

P.S. They paid their local property taxes for protection from "other laws" never 1-8-17 "Consent"ed to by us. The 16th Amendment with no enforcement clause but with the Federal government goons thinking it's in there George Orwellian "1984" style like The "Thought Police they are. 1-8-1 U.S. for the uniform of like a national poll tax is the way to go, but that there is none."

Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:56:38 -0800
From: Pete
Subject: Our life = life as "The Ant and the Grasshopper"
To: ___________
CC: ____________________

Thanks for sending this, Sis..

Doesn't take one too long while reading the little piece, below, that there is a certain relationship between the Insects (Ant Vs Grasshopper) and us humans...

Woe is us...

Methinks we need the immediate intervention of a loving God in our midst..

Sending on for other VIP friends to take a gander at..

Loving Regards,

Bro' Pete

--- On Mon, 1/23/12, _____  wrote:


    From: ______
    Subject: FW: The Ant and the Grasshopper
    Date: Monday, January 23, 2012, 8:32 AM

        The ANT
        AND THE
        GRASSHOPPER

        This one is a little different....
        Two Different Versions ...
        Two Different Morals

        OLD VERSION

        The ant works
        Hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

        The grasshopper
        Thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

        Come winter, the ant is warm
        And well fed.

        The grasshopper has
        No food or shelter, so he
        Dies out in the cold.

        MORAL OF THE OLD STORY:

        Be responsible for yourself!

        MODERN
        VERSION

        The ant works hard
        In the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house
        And laying up supplies for the winter.

        The grasshopper thinks the ant
        Is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

        Come winter, the shivering grasshopper
        Calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be
        Allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving.

        CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN,
        And ABC show up to
        Provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper
        Next to a video of the ant
        In his comfortable home with a table filled with food.
        America is stunned by the sharp contrast.

        How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper
        Is allowed to suffer so?

        Kermit the Frog appears
        On Oprah
        With the grasshopper
        And everybody cries when they sing, 'It's Not Easy Being Green...'

        Occupy the Anthill stages
        A demonstration in front of the ant's
        House where the news stations film the SEIU group singing, We shall overcome.

        Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright
        Has the group kneel down to pray for the grasshopper's sake,

        While he damns the ants.

        President Obama condemns the ant
        And blames
        President Bush 43, President Bush 41, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, and the
        Pope
        For the grasshopper's
        Plight.

        Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid
        Exclaim in an interview with Larry
        King that the ant has
        Gotten rich off the back of the
        Grasshopper,
        And both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

        Finally, the EEOC drafts
        The Economic Equity &
        Anti-Grasshopper Act
        Retroactive to the beginning of
        The summer.

        The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number
        Of green bugs and,
        Having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Government GreenCzar
        And given to the grasshopper.

        The story ends as we see the grasshopper
        And his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant's old house,
        Crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn't maintain it.

        The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.

        The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken
        Over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and peaceful, neighborhood.

        The entire Nation collapses
        Bringing the rest
        Of the free world with it.

        MORAL OF THE STORY:

        Be careful how you vote in 2012.

        I've sent this to you because I believe that you are an ant
        Not a grasshopper!

        Make sure that you pass
        This on to other ants.

        Don't bother sending
        It on to any grasshoppers
        Because they wouldn't
        Understand it, anyway" 

[JosephSHaas]

Aliens to spring Ed out of there! (;-)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46226992/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/second-sunken-ufo-claim-doesnt-really-hold-water/#.TyqFjoHQCu0

[DonnaVanMeter]

A little snippet about Ed and Elaine in this article, down towards the middle of it.

http://truthfrequencynews.com/another-american-freedom-radio-host-exposed-as-informant-throws-accomplice-under-the-bus-admits-children-were-abused/

Another American Freedom Radio Host exposed as INFORMANT – Throws accomplice under the bus/ admits to child abuse
By admin on Jan 31, 2012 with Comments

Truth Frequency News

by Chris Geo

A lie is a very short wick in a very small lamp. The oil of reputation is very soon sucked up and gone. And just as soon as a man is known to lie, he is like a two-foot pump in a hundred-foot well. He cannot touch bottom at all.- HENRY WARD BEECHER

American Freedom Radio host Christie Czajkowski, who is suspected of  being an informant and/or cointelpro operative, has been exposed as such beyond any reasonable doubt. According to KSPR, Radical white supremacist-turned-"natural herbalist healer", accused child abuser and Talkshoe conference call host, Christie Czajkowski will be testifying against Russell Dove in exchange for amnesty. Russell Dove has been her accomplice (and handler?) from San Diego, CA  to Tucson, AZ, and now in Branson, MO.

Russell Dove confessed to tying up Czajkowski's children multiple times in dark dank rooms as well as outdoors, tied to trees and exposed to the elements. Czajkowski's children were permanently taken from her almost two years ago, which was described by child protection advocates as the equivalent of a "death sentence" in family court.

It is important to note that from the beginning of this situation Czajkowski has maintained her innocence, publicly stating "the government is setting her up because she exposed a child prostitution ring in San Diego". You can see this video on Russia today where she blatantly lies to a worldwide audience and plays the victim role in order to pull at the heartstrings of whoever will listen. The fact is there is no evidence to support any of her claims.

Given the fact that she agreed to testify against Russ Dove, who was also charged with the same child abuse charges and confessed to the police,  justifying his actions as "necessary for discipline" and "performed  at Czajkowski's request", any reasonable person can conclude beyond the shadow of a doubt that the alleged child abuse indeed took place.  This new development puts things into perspective and  the thousands of dollars she has collected for her "legal defense fund" and her children's "legal defense fund" were essentially based on a fraud as were the tears and sympathies of people who tried to help and believed her soon-to-unravel web of lies.

FROM KSPR:
TANEY COUNTY, Mo.—A former internet radio host who was scheduled to go to trial Monday on child abuse charges will instead testify against her neighbor. Taney County, MO prosecutor Jeff Merrell tells KSPR the state reached an agreement with Christie Czajkowski to dismiss all charges against her without prejudice in exchange for truthful testimony in the state's case against Russell Dove.In April of 2010, investigators said Czajkowski asked Dove to tie up her daughters at his house. Police say Dove admitted to tying up the girls and spanking them when their mother asked him to. The girls were 11 and 12 years old at the time. Dove is charged with child abuse and felonious restraint. He's scheduled to be arraigned February 16.
This isn't the first time Christie Czajkowski has been arrested or turned states evidence.  In 2007, while part of the Minutemen group, Czajkowski filmed the Minutemen vandalizing illegal immigration camps. According to Czajkowski, the charges against her were dropped because she was "at a protest in another state" however we have obtained video of Czajkowski on Mexican news outlets where we discovered she not only was present during the vandalism, she was the one filming the events and turned the video over to the authorities in order to avoid prosecution.

Video 1 – Here

(Note in the video above, the reporter 1:37 in is Kristine Frazao, who was then a local Fox News reporter in San Diego, but has since begun working at Russia Today, which so happens to be the mouthpiece that Czajkowski used for her second round of disinformation.)

Video 2- Here

Jeff Schwilk also alleges that Christie has connections to Claudia Smith, a leading illegal alien activist with the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, who is also assumed to be involved with the SDPD herself. This would explain why, in the SPLC article about the San Diego Minutemen, Czajkowski and Dove are used to re-assert Schwilk's alleged "chauvanism" and "mistreatment of women". Not only does this article make Jeff Schwilk look like an utter pig, it also seems to rely almost solely on Czajkowski's, Dove's, and Smith's

testimonies to make the label stick. Even more interesting is the fact that the McGonigle Canyon incident was admittedly "monitored" by "volunteers" from the California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation. Gee, I wonder who those "volunteers" could be, especially given the fact that the only tape that seemed to float to the surface was none other than Christie Czajkowski's? Maybe an article released by "La Voz de Aztlan", called "Minutemen accused of trashing a "Virgen de Guadalupe" chapel" , could shed some light on this event:

A former member of the San Diego Minutemen has accused its leader and others of desecrating and trashing a "Virgen de Guadalupe" chapel at a Mexican migrant worker's camp in McGonigle Canyon. The chapel was built by the agricultural workers to worship the much venerated Mexican mother of Jesus on Sunday masses. Christie Czajkowski, who has since turned against the San Diego Minutemen, has provided a video that shows the beautiful shrine to "La Reina de Mexico" and the vigilantes trashing the makeshift homes of the Mexican migrant workers that labor in the tomato fields nearby. Christie Czajkowski turned the video over to a San Diego news service. The video depicts the Minutemen standing before the "Virgen de Guadalupe" chapel, suddenly goes off-camera and then loud smashing sounds can be heard. "Oh no, I won't let you, I'm sorry," Czajkowski is heard yelling. Christie Czajkowski is a Christian. The San Diego Police Department is presently investigating the case.

IMPORTANT NOTE: Exactly like the claim made by Czajkowski that she exposed a child prostitution ring (and filmed it), we are unable to find any videos regarding either "story". (And I stress the word "story").

This is a very efficient propaganda piece, as it relies on the religious fervor that Hispanics generally show in these particular locales, similar to the showing of church burnings or mosque bombings to get a group of people in the deep south or in the middle east riled up. Also, Christie is venerated as almost a "Joan of Arc" character, as she bravely stands her ground with her "Christian"-ness. This is actually 180 degrees away from Christie's true character, as we've already explained, and only goes to further our theory of her true connections to front organizations and agent provocateurs.

Russell Dove has quite a history himself. He has been connected with many radical groups and political movements in San Diego and Arizona. In 2006, while heading the American Democrats For A Secure Border, Russell Dove and two others committed voter intimidation while walking around with 9mm weapons strapped to their side, asking Hispanic voters to show their identification and prove they are legally eligible to vote. Oddly enough, the Bush Justice Department intervened and no charges were filed against them or the Minutemen. Russell Dove has frequently posted videos of himself provocateuring pro-illegal immigrant rallies and meetings, often with a helmet cam, yelling at the top of his lungs and causing a scene effectively making himself and anti-illegal immigration groups look like kooks and psychos.

This isn't the first time charges against Russell Dove magically disappeared. In 1980,  Russell Dove was charged with aggravated burglary but we have been unable to find the details of this case as of now.

Based in Tucson, Dove has long been involved with the Sovereign Citizen Movement in Arizona, calls himself "Russ 'Sovereign' Dove," and styles himself a "biblical constitutionalist." His hatred of government was no doubt stroked by his 1980 felony conviction in California for attempted grand theft (two first degree burglary charges were dismissed) -

Dove was however arrested by local police for the following incident:

On August 17, 2006 Russ Dove was arrested and subsqutently convicted and sentenced to 30 days in jail, $1,000.00 fine, 18 months probation, restraing order protecting OBL Agents and 10 hours of anger management. You can view the video here

Russel Dove was also heavily involved with the Bill Johnson campaign, a candidate who ran against Gabriel Giffords in 2006. Russell Dove is completely exposed in a post entitled, "Who is William "Bill" Johnson, Candidate for CD 8?. Russel Dove was named as the Custodian Of Records for the Johnson campaign and 'acting manager'. Here are some interesting quotes from the website.

"Unlike Vanderboegh and Wright, who head state organizations of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, Russ Dove's role in the MCDC is more circumspect. A member of the militia umbrella group the Third Continental Congress, Dove managed to escape association with that militia's most notorious criminal action– Bradly Glover's planned attack on the US Army base at Fort Hood in 1997, which eventually sent seven members of the militia group to prison.

Dove's current principal role in the MCDC is as a propagandist. He produces video tapes for the Minutemen, filming interviews with many MCDC participants during their border patrol operations and authoring frequent reports on immigration issues on his Web site and "Truth In Action News" radio show."

According to e-mails by Jeff Schwilk to Russell Dove posted on Czajkowski's website, Russell Dove and Christie Czajkowski were connected and possibly working side by side with Shawna Forde, the Arizona white supremacist on death row for the slaughter of a 9 year old immigrant girl and her father. In February of 2011, Laine Lawless was a guest on Czajkowski's show where they defended Shawna Forde and tried to paint the same picture Czajkowski painted to the public about her child abuse charges, "the government was setting them up", "they were victims", etc. etc. It is only because the mother of the 9 year old girl survived by "playing dead" after being shot that the case was prosecuted and a death row conviction was handed down to Forde and her accomplice, "Gunny" Bush.

An early exchange within the 911 call is as follows:

Gonzalez: "They shot me and I pretended like I was dead. My daughter was crying. They shot her, too.

Operator: "Are they still there, the people who, that shot them?"

Gonzalez: "They're coming back in! They're coming back in!" (Gunfire.)[3]

Listen to the full chilling 911 call here: WARNING EXTREMELY GRAPHIC

We made contact with Russell Dove and attempted to allow him to comment but he declined to speak to us. You can listen to the phone call here.

American Freedom Radio is run by Joseph D. Romero who goes by the name Danny Romero, out of Austin, TX. Danny Romero, a Hispanic himself, has aligned himself with many white supremacists in the past, including Mark Koernke and reportedly FBI Informant Hal Turner. In 2006, during the Ed and Elaine Brown incident, Danny Romero along with an American Freedom Radio show host named Torin Wolf, held a number of protests and concerts in front of the Browns home. It is reported once Ed and Elaine Brown were arrested, Torin Wolf was exposed as an FBI informant and testified against the Browns. Czajkowski credits Torin Wolf as her "good friend from Arizona" who got her involved in "radio". Oddly enough, all mentions of Torin Wolf have been scrubbed from the American Freedom Radio archives and Czajkowski's site as well, but thanks to the cache and way back machine we were able to dig this up here.

Christie Czajkowski headed the Minutemen with Jeff Schwilk in San Diego from late 2005 to mid 2007 when she was outed by every chapter for displaying cointelpro and mentally unstable behavior. According to the Minutemen, after attempting to commit suicide in front of Jeff Schwilk's home, she filed a fraudulent $700,000 law suit against Schwilk for having to physically remove her from his property. However, this is not the first display of mental illness we were able to find. According to the Minutemen website, Czajkowski  has been hospitalized multiple times at Sharp Mesa Vista Mental Hospital.

Danny Romero, while in the Navy, was stationed around the San Diego area and according to online records, his wife Dawn  Romero also has previous addresses listed around the San Diego area with most current address in Round Rock, TX (A suburb of Austin). This was cross verified with the listing for Joseph D. Romero which yields the same results:

Round Rock, TX
Mission Viejo, CA
Lake Forest, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA

We are certain we have the correct records for and the correct Dawn Romero and Joeseph D. Romero because we've personally visited the address in Round Rock (which is readily available on the internet).  We were invited  to drive from Dallas to Round Rock for a big BBQ and celebration where many of our friends were supposed to attend. When we arrived, nobody was there and all Romero wanted was for us to fix some technical problems the network was having since I have a degree in audio engineering. He didn't even so much as offer us a beer and we wound up buying him dinner at a nearby steakhouse because we were saving our appetites for the big supposed BBQ event, so we didn't eat all day.

Upon looking for a connection to Arizona we stumbled across an article from the Tucson Tumbleweed. At first we wondered if Dawn Romero's maiden name is Stanley however according to one single record we were able to find, her name appears as Dawn M Romero, Dawn D. Romero and Dawn Jacobs. We have not been able to find any other clues as to the actual maiden name however the article below is quite interesting. Keep in mind, a person would most likely use his/her common name rather than legal name to be referred to as on paper. Plus, I don't know how common it is for a person to name his/her child something like Danny or Mike or Sam. It's usually short for something like Daniel, Michael, Samuel or Samantha, etc. etc. So we are not ruling out the possibility that this is referring to Joseph D. and Dawn Romero. However we will keep digging until we get to the facts behind the matter and unearth the truth behind this web of deceit.

According to the Tucson Tumbleweed in an article about police corruption

The paper also revealed the questionable activities and backgrounds of several deputies. Among them:

• Deputy Danny Romero received a less-than-honorable discharge from the Navy for drug abuse and was indicted for vehicular homicide in 1987. In the second incident, an accident on State Route 186 near Willcox, a teenage girl was thrown from Romero's truck and killed. Police reports say Romero had been drinking, but refused to submit to a blood test. The charge against him was later dropped for lack of evidence.

• Dawn Stanley, another of the Marshal's hires, had been fired by Arizona Game & Fish following a series of allegations, including lying and failing to do assigned tasks, according to a nine-page termination memo prepared by the agency. The background investigation prior to her hiring was done by Danny Romero. He gave her a good recommendation.



As of today, the official story from Danny Romero is that Dawn Romero is an executive for the Target Corporation. The Target Corporation has one of the biggest forensics labs in the country and regularly does pro-bono work for law enforcement and intelligence agencies.

From CNN: Turns out Target has one of the most advanced crime labs in the country at its headquarters in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It was initially set up to deal with things like theft, fraud, and personal injury cases in their stores. Now, Target also helps law enforcement agencies nationwide solve crimes, even murders. Target has worked with the Secret Service, the ATF, and the FBI, to name a few.

Target does the work for free, seeing it as a kind of community service. It doesn't advertise its crime lab services, but word started spreading and law enforcement agencies started asking for help. Some government agency labs aren't as well-equipped as Target's. In other cases, Target can get results faster because of logjams in agency labs.

Personal Experience with American Freedom Radio

During our short run on American Freedom Radio we noticed a few anomalies that raised suspicion, to say the least. Danny Romero would go out of his way to feed us information which was none of our business, particularly about another host on the network named Jim Answerman. Jim Answerman drove to Branson, MO to "help" Christie Czajkowski because he too fell for the story that she was being "set up by the government" on "trumped up child abuse charges". She had him (and us, along with many others) convinced that she was being stalked and targeted by the government.

Answerman spent about $5000 on his trip and set up surveillance equipment for Christie's protection. The second day of his visit, Dove confided in Answerman and explained the child abuse was necessary for discipline. Jim Answerman drove back home and made this new development known to Danny Romero. Instead of pulling Christie's show off of the network, particularly for lying to the audience and begging for money for a "legal defense fund" and a "legal defense fund for her children" (who were already in CPS custody and on their way back to their fathers' custody), Danny Romero silenced Jim Answerman by cancelling his show and began a smear campaign against him. Romero went out of his way to inform anyone who would listen that Answerman had low ratings, was unprofessional, had a terrible presentation and was pulled for being a poor host.

Another odd conversation we had with Romero was about his station We The People Radio. (American Freedom Radio isn't the first incarnation of this Austin based "network). In several conversations Romero would go out of his way to show us pictures of him and Alex Jones and talk about WTPR and how he was wrongfully locked out of the websites by Wes Perkins, Alex Jone's right hand man. Wes was in charge of the technical end of WTPR and suddenly for no apparent reason Wes decided to lock him out on the orders of Alex Jones simply because he wanted to screw his friend over. Well, that's what Romero wanted us to believe. What really happened (we found out from multiple reliable sources) is Danny Romero was in charge of the book keeping and refused to show the books to anyone. Was he trying to  to cover up losses or gains or was he trying to cover up the source of his funding? Your guess is as good as ours but given the shadiness of every incarnation of this network and the key players involved, we can be confident in our assumption.

The management at American Freedom Radio is completely and 100% backwards from anything you would expect. As we grew our banners and archives were moved to the back ends of the website and at the bottom of pages. When it was clear we were beginning to rival some of the very best out there,  Danny Romero worked to inject Christie Czajkowski into our show who tried to steer it in directions detrimental to our message. While I fell for it briefly and fell for her lies hook line and sinker based mostly on Danny's testimony about her, I soon became more and more resistant to their methods.

At about the same time, Joe Rogan sent us a fan letter complimenting our show and naturally we invited him on as a guest. During the first twenty minutes, with thousands of listeners (the biggest live  audience the network has ever seen), we experienced very odd technical problems. Danny's attitude was passive essentially encouraging us to cancel the broadcast instead of taking the reigns to make it happen, as we would expect from a network manager. Luckily, Joe was one of the coolest people we've met in this scene and completely understanding. After we fixed the technical issues and Joe accused Czajkowski of working for the government (on air) in the first 15 or 20 minutes of the show (prompting her to abruptly drop off from the interview), Joe delivered one of the most classic interviews we've ever heard from him.

At this point Czajkowski began a whisper campaign against us in a very poorly-executed attempt to smear our reputation, accusing us from everything from being sexual deviants to drug addicts, pedophiles, drug dealers, domestic terrorists planning to bomb buildings, sleeper cells, claiming I beat Sheree, you name it. We also received a few death threats around the same time so I am not excluding intimidation as one of the methods either. Czajkowski also has a long list of "stalkers" whom she makes the same accusations towards.

I was in the process of moving at the time so I disconnected myself from the internet world for about a week. When I got back, I was greeted by so much drama, it wasn't even funny. At this point I told Danny that she had to go because she was following the patterns her "stalkers" accused her of. To this point I believed her stories that she was the victim (in all cases) which in hindsight, I don't understand how I lost so much discernment during this time. I guess I was being naive and wanting to believe that everyone  in the patriot community stands for truth and freedom as I do.

The smear campaign was short-lived and extremely weak and ineffective. Oracle Broadcasting gave us a new home immediately, where we have climbed our way to be the number one show and good friends with the owners. However before we did so, Danny Romero, in a last ditch effort to silence us, took the time out to call Oracle Broadcasting and attempt to slander our name. Oracle Broadcasting basically laughed at the allegations and because of a good friend who I've known for quite sometime was connected with Oracle, we are here doing what we are doing.

At first we questioned why Christie Czajkowski, Danny Romero and others would come after us in this manner considering we are extremely professional hosts, very extensive researchers and critical thinkers, and why they would come after us with so much to hide. The answer to that question is now clear, they completely under estimated us, our abilities and our commitment to honor and truth yet knew what we were capable of exposing so they tried to silence us. I suppose they expected us to start "flinging crap" right back at them and enter some sort of pissing contest but when we see cointelpro attacking us, we always take a big step back and dissect the methods rather than engaging in the s*** storm.

For the past 1 year+, we have sat back and just watched things happen, trying not to give these people any more publicity than they deserve. However, now that it is apparent that the two little girls who had to suffer such terrible abuse will not get justice, the only justice we can offer them is a full expose of the perpetrators and those who helped them.

May God have mercy upon their souls. I shudder to think what kind of karma those people have to deal with.

[JosephSHaas]

A little snippet about Ed and Elaine in this article, down towards the middle of it.

http://truthfrequencynews.com/another-american-freedom-radio-host-exposed-as-informant-throws-accomplice-under-the-bus-admits-children-were-abused/

Another American Freedom Radio Host exposed as INFORMANT – Throws accomplice under the bus/ admits to child abuse
By admin on Jan 31, 2012 with Comments

Truth Frequency News

by Chris Geo

A lie is a very short wick in a very small lamp. The oil of reputation is very soon sucked up and gone. And just as soon as a man is known to lie, he is like a two-foot pump in a hundred-foot well. He cannot touch bottom at all.- HENRY WARD BEECHER

American Freedom Radio host Christie Czajkowski, who is suspected of  being an informant and/or cointelpro operative, has been exposed as such beyond any reasonable doubt. According to KSPR, Radical white supremacist-turned-"natural herbalist healer", accused child abuser and Talkshoe conference call host, Christie Czajkowski will be testifying against Russell Dove in exchange for amnesty. Russell Dove has been her accomplice (and handler?) from San Diego, CA  to Tucson, AZ, and now in Branson, MO. . . . "

Thanks Donna,

Of: the Ed Brown paragraph:

"American Freedom Radio is run by Joseph D. Romero who goes by the name Danny Romero, out of Austin, TX. Danny Romero, a Hispanic himself, has aligned himself with many white supremacists in the past, including Mark Koernke and reportedly FBI Informant Hal Turner. In 2006, during the Ed and Elaine Brown incident, Danny Romero along with an American Freedom Radio show host named Torin Wolf, held a number of protests and concerts in front of the Browns home. It is reported once Ed and Elaine Brown were arrested, Torin Wolf was exposed as an FBI informant and testified against the Browns. Czajkowski credits Torin Wolf as her "good friend from Arizona" who got her involved in "radio". Oddly enough, all mentions of Torin Wolf have been scrubbed from the American Freedom Radio archives and Czajkowski's site as well, but thanks to the cache and way back machine we were able to dig this up here."

and my comment here of:

So HOW can any of this help Ed & Elaine Brown now? Was this Joseph D. "Danny" Romero ever listed as a witness in either Ed & Elaine's case or that of the "co-conspirators"? case. Yes or No? ________

If not then here in New Hampshire the Feds did ALSO violate one of our Bill of Rights in a "complete" trial (by Article 14 of the N.H. Constitution) of to include ALL witnesses.  Of him listed on the witness list of: ______ but not called? I was on the witness list too, but was an un-called witness.  As already indicated: "American Freedom Radio is run by Joseph D. Romero" and is hosted by Christie Czajkowski, the hostess.  Of it what? A branch from like the original trunk of the tree being The "We The People Radio"? W.T.P.R. or WTPR.  Reference that Wes Perkins lock-out of Romero from the websites on orders of Alex Jones based upon suspicions of federal funding to Romero.  Of back then of the concerts at Ed's I was in Florida visiting my mother, and so had no meetings with this Romero, but did like it when Troy Brooks of W.T.P.R. did interview me and filmed my being arrested of walking to The Town Hall in Plainfield to have met with the Board of Selectmen about this RSA Ch. 123:1 issue of Federal non-filing, but not done and so with Bernie presenting them with the gold-sealed document from the N.H. Secretary of State and Bernie telling them to either: (1)  return the property taxes paid under a "Protection Racket" of NOT protecting these Article 12 inhabitants (and Article 30 citizens) from these "other laws" of the U.S. Codes never 1-8-17 "Consent"ed to, OR (2) them of the Town Officials PLUS County Sheriff to do their RSA Ch. 92:2 duties of "protection"! Of me (TRYing to) making this "Point of Order" in the co-conspirator case, but that the judge and U.S. Marshals would have none of this. The word Marshals in this article of: " Dawn Stanley, another of the Marshal's hires, had been fired by Arizona Game & Fish following a series of allegations, including lying and failing to do assigned tasks, according to a nine-page termination memo prepared by the agency. The background investigation prior to her hiring was done by Danny Romero. He gave her a good recommendation." And so the bottom line of not just a few bad apples in the "Uncle Sam" barrel, but that of them mostly corrupt as to lie or ALL of them a bunch of liars and thieves! Of for a state check and balance against this Federal crap to take place next week on Tuesday, February 7th @ 11:30 a.m. in ED&A Room 306 of the L.O.B. in Concord, N.H. on Dan Itse's House Bill #1169 of that I've already alerted Bill Gardner, the Secretary of State in person and just yesterday afternoon too of giving an invitation to Brittany the receptionist for the governor John H. Lynch of Hopkinton to attend too, as per his Article 51 duty is based therefrom of to BOTH "execute the laws of the state AND of the United States" (emphasis ADDed) as for BOTH the shield AND the sword, and not this "or" crap by him, of the former being for Article 12 "protection", and the later with jurisdictional authority ONLY that of AFTER the 40USC255 to 3112 Federal agent as "head" of "agency" files their papers, since as by the Adams case therein U.S. Attorney Manual 664 spells it out that an OFFER of CONDITIONAL "Consent" of that TYPE is NOT "Consent" UNTIL accepted!  Re: the offer has been available since June 14, 1883 but yet to be taken advantage of, and while "they" of BOTH crooks in BOTH governments (Federal AND State) do continue their wrongs by providing no Article 18 rehabilitation! as I've alerted to my Federal Congressman Frank Guinta, but who has turned a deaf ear, and so be it that he either: Wise Up or go DEAF! Completely deaf!

[JosephSHaas]

From: Me
To: ~housestate-federalrelationsandveteransaffairs at leg.state.nh.us; al.baldasaro at leg.state.nh.us; 64ferrari at comcast.net; kirsten.larsen at leg.state.nh.us; lars at taybre.net; yourfamilysfuture at comcast.net; drstevec at live.com; qtipnh at aol.com; frank.mccarthy at leg.state.nh.us; jeanine.notter at leg.state.nh.us; daniel.tamburello at leg.state.nh.us; lcvita2 at earthlink.net; ted.rokas at leg.state.nh.us; baldwindomingo at yahoo.com; rhofemann at aol.com; robert.theberge at leg.state.nh.us; dale.spainhower at leg.state.nh.us; ann.fitzgerald at leg.state.nh.us; mark.warden at leg.state.nh.us; itsenh at comcast.net; seth.cohn at leg.state.nh.us; armlaw at hotmail.com
CC: ~houseexecutivedepartmentsandadministration at leg.state.nh.us; carol at mcguire4house.com; khawkins2 at comcast.net; john.sytek at leg.state.nh.us; rcday2 at comcast.net; calvin.pratt at leg.state.nh.us; lawrence.perkins at leg.state.nh.us; libertynh at myfairpoint.net; spec.bowers at leg.state.nh.us; paul.brown at leg.state.nh.us; peter.hansen at leg.state.nh.us; mark.proulx at leg.state.nh.us; randall.whitehead at leg.state.nh.us; reppbs at ttlc.net; maurice.pilotte at leg.state.nh.us; jean.jeudy at gmail.com; dan.sullivan at leg.state.nh.us; housemunicipalandcountygovt at leg.state.nh.us; bevferrante at yahoo.com; franklin.sterling at leg.state.nh.us; philip.munck at leg.state.nh.us; blpatten at hotmail.com; priscillalockwood at myfairpoint.net; harry.accornero at leg.state.nh.us; jim.belanger at leg.state.nh.us; john.burt at leg.state.nh.us; jim at coffey.net; tim at copelandforstratham.com; robert.moore at leg.state.nh.us; jeffrey.shackett at leg.state.nh.us; kathleen.stroud at leg.state.nh.us; sdestefano at aol.com; kriseroberts at live.com; dhooper5 at comcast.net; bruce.tatro at leg.state.nh.us; josephshaas at hotmail.com
Subject: Proof of Dulocracy
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:48:59 -0500

Proof of a Dulocracy.       141.4 KB of 25.0 MB

The original of the attached copy being un-signed then the facts therein are:

Admitted/ admitted avered* as true:" Prima Facie Evidence:

* "To declare in a positive, dogmatic**, or formal manner." From the ML Medieval Latin" of: "to assert as true."

** "Marked by an authoritarian*** assertion of principles."

*** http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html "[Art.] 8. [Accountability of Magistrates and Officers; Public's Right to Know.] All power residing originally in, and being derived from, the people, all the magistrates and officers of government are their substitutes and agents, and at all times accountable to them. . . ."

So with me as one of the "them" of the "people" and of your un-accountability to answer my two questions, you have in effect admitted that you House Speaker have violated your RSA Ch. 92:2   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm oath of office to Article 84   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html   and in particular to: "bear faith and true allegiance to the United States of America" that is supposed to be an Article IV, Section 4 "Republican form of government" based on not merely "a" constitution, but of by Article VII of: "this Constitution"  of or for the United States of America.

The word "Establishment" in Article VII of the U.S. Constitution is defined therein of it founded then or created.  And that by Article VI, Section 2 of toward that other definition of the word "Establish" to mean "To cause to be recognized and accepted".  HOW? by the "in Pursuance thereof" phrase. NOT pursuant to, with the letter "t" of there is this "accord" or "agreement" or "concord" = "concurrence" of from the Latin word concors "of the same mind" , but look to the two definitions of the word "concur" = "To act together" as in what? the lawful and unlawful?! Of on June 14, 1883 we, the people, through our State Reps gave an agreement to the Feds, but of what TYPE? A CONDITIONAL agreement, that as spelled out in the Adams case of 1943 cited within U.S. Attorney Manual 664  http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm  reads that an offer un-accepted is NOT 1-8-17 "Consent" per the U.S. Constitution.  Thus to that definition of the word "concur" defined as "To coincide" = "To OCCUPY the same POSITION simultaneously" (emphasis ADDed for this "Occupy" Movement, and position = of not just "A point of view" but that of an actual "place or location" because like I've said: the word is NOT pursuant to, BUT that of the phrase: "In Pursuance thereof" of that word pursuance = "A carrying out or putting into effect", of that by N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 123:1 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm  that until that 40USC255 to 3112 Federal "agent" or "head" of "agency" does file the required papers with our N.H. Secretary of State (as compared to "Uncle Sam"'s agent having to file the same to the governor in Florida,  http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm   as each state is different in their requirement), then and only then can the Feds by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution exercise "like Authority" of this "exclusive Legislation" where? ANYwhere in our state of New Hampshire? No! Only "over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of" OUR State that did give this CONDITIONAL Consent so long as the papers were filed, of them to have "exclusive"ness to exercise Legislation as by the U.S. Codes THERE of this exclusive word defined NOT just as "Not divided or shared with others" (as Judge David Hacket Souter pinned this down in Boston as his choice of THAT definition of the word, when the argument by the two attorneys Sven Wiberg of Portsmouth and Joshua Gordon of Concord for Dan Riley and Cirino Gonzalez respectfully did a LOUSY job at oral ARGUment, by NOT arguing back to that OTHER definition of the word exclusive meaning: "Admitting only certain people; select." as in those #____ Bar Members of the N.H. Bar Association AND by RSA 123:1  for those "certain people" who do serve and EXECUTE " all civil and criminal process issuing under the authority of this state" of call it "concurrent" jurisdiction of the SAME as THIS definition of this EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction!

To do otherwise than what the law pre-scribes turns this good definition of the word "Establishment" into "the Establishment" meaning "An EXCLUSIVE or powerful group in CONTROL of society or a field of activity." [emphasis ADDed, in that of for: (a) the word "control" of to Article 12 of our N.H. Bill of Rights in that" "...Nor are the inhabitants of this state CONTROLlable by any OTHER laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent." with this further emphasis ADDed too for to be "protected" when the "property" taxes be paid, that if there be no "Reciprocal" -ness or without an "Interchange" = "To exchange" one for the other of the property tax money for this "protection" then what we have is not a "Mutual" but that of a "Protection Racket"! and (b) for the word exclusive too as explained above.]

So to please go by the RSA Ch. 21:2 definition of the words   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/I/21/21-2.htm   as spelled out above, as it is your oath and duty to do, lest your RSA Ch. 92-B:1-5 bonds  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-VI-93-B.htm   be attached for your unfaithfulness for payment in the amount of over $1,500, for a trial by jury by Article 20 since like I've testified to in HB1507-L  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/billtext.aspx?billnumber=HB1507.html and   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/HouseBillsinCommitteeDocket.aspx?lsr=2115&code=H18 = 2/6/2012 "Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate for Feb 15 (Vote 13-0; CC); HC 11, PG.689" to see what happens, plus:   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/housebillsincommitteebillstatus.aspx?lsr=2115&code=H18   on Monday, January 23rd before The Municipal and County Government Committee too getting a cc of this also   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H18     [reference: (Henry Campbell) "Black's Law Dictionary" 5th edition, (c)1979, page 1307: A Tax "in its essential characteristics is not a debt. City of Newark v. Jos. Hollander, Inc., 136 N.J.Eq. 539, 42 A.2d 872, 875."]  with the follow-up papers attached to my one-page typewritten summary,  that a tax is NOT a debt, but a charge, as you only "owe" the charge IF you consent or it is ever declared a debt, of there a lot of unlawful charges put upon us all! and especially when liened BEFORE trial, as a violation of "due process of law" in HOW a charge MIGHT become a due debt, as an attachment is a taking, as in the equity borrowing power of such, and so to sevenfold those $amounts in such a lawsuit, as by when you catch a thief, of this RSA Ch. 637:5 Theft by Extortion,  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/637/637-5.htm   then you charge seven times ( x 7 ) the $amount stolen! Proverbs 6:30-31 in The Bible as mentioned in "Blackstone's Commentaries" over to a case and another case within the State v. Fleming case of 1984 as annotated in the RSA Ch. 651:63 Restitution statute http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/LXII/651/651-63.htm   here in New Hampshire as the guideline for a jury to decide.

So let's "get with it"!  Eliminate four (4) House members NOW by the percentage of 1.4% as pre-scribed by law, lest ALL your Legislation be tainted with unlawfulness of me asserting my right of to deal ONLY with the statutes are passed by lawfully sitting officials.  This is my RIGHT as guaranteed by the Ninth (9th) Amendment of: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." AND this IN-cludes all judges, as appointed by the Governor & Council as tainted too by the governor who is not executing the laws of this state AND of the United States, but instead has replaced that "and" word with an "or", thus in effect having thrown out our Article 12 "protection" and so for his violating Article 51, he SHALL be Article 41 "responsible for" this theft of our rights and so to please begin the Article 40 impeachment against him too AFTER you, in the plurality of the House, straighten up from your crooked ways! Of I only deal under the "Four corners rule" of the instrument being THE Constitution in the "whole" and not these "isolated" attachments of statutes added thereto of supposedly constitutional as in when done by a majority O.K. in a democracy, but that we are supposed to be living in a Republic! To me the statutes passed must be voted for by perfection of ONLY those lawfully allowed to sit.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

From: Me
To: You (in the To: section above)
Subject: (#1 of 5) FW: (Update) RE: [Attachment] FW: HB1169 FW: (Andy's copy) FW: (Petition #22) RE: ___________
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:37:34 -0500

Here's forward #1 of 5 as indicated in the P.S. to my e-mail to you of  1:16 p.m. this afternoon of dealing with HB1277 and HB 1627.

More details about the "My guess" paragraph and for either: (a) four [4] of you in the House to be dismissed or (b) to file a bill for to vote for the election of judges, can be found in the Legislative Administration Committee dealing with CACR 27 asnd HB1718 and the 14th Amendment, Section 2. Of "due process of" THIS law first please so as NOT to taint all your efforts at passing un-lawful legislation.

From: Me
To: You (in the first part of the cc: section above)
Subject: (Update) RE: [Attachment] FW: HB1169 FW: (Andy's copy) FW: (Petition #22) RE: ___________
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:57:23 -0500

"In preparation for tomorrow's Public Hearing on this at 11:30 a.m. in 306 LOB in ED&A. . .

My guess . . .  And so when there be NEITHER: (1) a reduction in the representation in the N.H. General Court by 4 members (as the percentage by U.S. Census be 1.4% or one for each of 100 State Reps. x 4 = the 400) NOR (2) the election of judges, we have not a constitutional government, but that of a Dulocracy, defined in (Henry Campbell) Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition, (c)1979 at page 450 as"A government were (public) servants. . . have so much license and privilege that they domineer." = defined as "1. To rule arrogantly [ * ]; tyrannize. 2. To be overbearing." and from the other dictionary of: I. to also rule despotically, to tower (over or above); II. to govern arbitrarily. - based on individual judgment, as in their "slip opinions" they bind together into the N.H. Reports and call them case-law, and "Not limited by law; despotic." Also: "Determined by whim or caprice." = "An impulsive change of mind." of from the Italian word: capriccio = "head with hair standing on end." . . . . "

[JosephSHaas]

From: josephshaas at hotmail dot com
To: jack.barnes at leg.state.nh.us; john.gallus at leg.state.nh.us; blpatten at hotmail.com; priscillalockwood at myfairpoint.net; shamilton at rev.state.nh.us; mnoel at milford.nh.gov; jlessard at municipalresources.com; granitehillmunisvs at hotmail.com; r.j.gagne at comcast.net; gerzolb at nu.com; eric.stohl at leg.state.nh.us; fkeach at dmflowers.com; sderosier at rev.state.nh.us
CC: cguyer at rev.state.nh.us; house_communications at leg.state.nh.us; william.obrien at leg.state.nh.us; peter.bragdon at leg.state.nh.us; gcweb at nh.gov; rburton at nh.gov; dst.hilaire at nh.gov; csununu at nh.gov; rwieczorek at nh.gov; dwheeler at nh.gov; itsenh at comcast.net; ingbretson_studio at yahoo.com; jeanie.forrester at leg.state.nh.us; dboutin1465 at comcast.net; amanda.merrill at leg.state.nh.us; nancy.stiles at leg.state.nh.us; mwright at townofboscawen.org; clerk at btla.state.nh.us; josephshaasjr at hotmail dot com; armlaw at hotmail dot com
Subject: Update to: The "Reference Manual for Selectmen, Appraisors and Taxpayers" (of 2008)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:42:32 -0500

"There's a problem with Hotmail right now
We're working hard to fix it, but it may take a little while longer. Sorry for the inconvenience." in not being able to make a printout copy of this.

And so to here, thank you Kat.   - - Joe

"To: The Assessing Standards Board
c/o
Kevin A. Clougherty, Commissioner
State of New Hampshire
Department of Revenue Administration
109 Pleasant Street
PO Box 457
Concord, NH 03302-0457
(603) 230-5005
http://www.revenue.nh.gov/contact/index.htm
via Carol Guyer @ 230-5011

and:

Stephanie Derosier
Equalization Division
(Ph) 603-230-5955 (Direct Line)
(Ph) 603-230-5950 (Main Line)
(Fax) 603-271-1161
sderosier at rev.state.nh dot us

Plus especially: Scott  _______; Joseph Lessard, NHAAO from Meredith; Sub-Committee Chairman & Public Member Leonard "Len" Gerzon from Amherst; Stephan Hamilton, N.H. DRA (Dept. of Revenue Administration) Property "Appraisal" Director; Gary _______, invited guest;  and Marti Noel, NHAAO of 40 North Main Street, Boscawen, N.H. 03303 there for two years 9/19/11 to 9/19/13; with Secretary Stephanie, as attendees to yesterday's sub-committee.

Re:

(1)  My e-mail letter
Subject: Complaint: against the Commissioner AND The ASB Members.
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:45:38 -0500

http://www.revenue.nh.gov/ (click the seal to the left for Municipal Services, Property Appraisal)

There is no fork in the road to get to the Tax "assessment" page as none exists!

http://www.revenue.nh.gov/munc_prop/index.htm (click The Property "Appraisal" Division link)

http://www.revenue.nh.gov/munc_prop/propertyappraisal.htm (click the Members pdf link under the ASB)

http://www.revenue.nh.gov/munc_prop/assessing-board/documents/members.pdf

wherein I did also cc: The Discovery Bureau, PO Box 488, Concord, NH 03302-0488, (603) 230-5086 and Hearings Bureau, PO Box 1467, Concord, NH 03302-1467, (603) 230-5002, Hearings Officer: Denise A. Daniel, Esq., Function: Provides appeals to taxpayers dissatisfied with a decision of the Department for the Commissioner of Revenue.

About:

1.  getting a complaint form to your website so that when ASB Members refuse or fail to do their duty* as the ASB (Assessing Standards Board) NOT The "Appraisal" Standards Board, then progress can be made toward a correction.  [ Reference: (a) them having been assigned this dual duty to BOTH the Property AND Tax "assessments", but who have FAILed to send these RSA Chapter 21-J:14-b Tax Assessment "Guidelines" * to the municipalities (cities and towns, being Article 28-a political sub-divisions of the state, in our N.H. Bill of Rights).]

2.   my request that the Commissioner please give to me his answer/ excuse in like a SHOW CAUSE hearing of WHY he AND they of the Members ought not to be found in "Contempt of Court" : The General Court that is of the Legislature, of a copy of this to the appointing authorities of to the G&C for you of The Governor & Council, plus that of the House Speaker and Senate President for State Reps. Patten and Lockwood, plus Barnes and Gallus respectfully.

3.  of these in-actions having caused MUCH problems for me at the local level in Boscawen of MANY hours of having to give the officials there my PRIVATE Guidelines substitution for what this ASB was supposed to give them the PUBLIC Guidelines per the "shall" word in the statute.  Of me seeking monetary abatements from their illegal and unlawful over-taxing me and being just plain George Orwellian "Nineteen Eight Four" Doubletalkers! like calling a zoning restriction a prohibition and calling a removal of a destruction!

4. my suggestion that the Commissioner take the blame for all of the ASB members who ought to be thrown in jail to be "corrected" by my visiting you therein to TEACH you of what I've given as course materials to both the Merrimack County Superior Court and BTLA (The Board of Tax & Land Appeals).  By Articles 22 + 23 of The New Hampshire Constitution, Part the Second to have whatever forum therein, like maybe the House Speaker to House Rule 36 endorse this Article 32 Petition over to the House Grievance Committee to hold that SHOW CAUSE hearing and sentence the Commissioner  to say: nine (9) days in jail, and if by RSA Ch. 651:18 or 19 for good behavior, of to actually serve 2/3rds = six days there of like Monday through Saturday at 12:01 a.m. of two  classes in this course on Monday and Wednesday with "home"work on Tuesday and Thursday, of him given a Certificate of Correction by me Friday night if you pass the test that day and can then finally do what the statute pre-scribes.

5.  the forward of my e-mail of Thu., Dec. 29th @ 10:36 AM to Representative Dan Itse about this as a cover sheet to that of what I did write in the *** P.S. of: "And so a copy of this to the Commissioner there today to see to it that I get an Administrative Hearing for to find this ASB in violation of the law!" +

(2) yesterday's "ASSESSING STANDARDS BOARD (RSA 21-J:14-a), Department of Revenue Administration, 109 Pleasant Street, Concord 9:30 a.m. (to 11:15 a.m.) Subcommittee meeting."   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/caljourns/calendars/2012/houcal2012_14.html  that I did attend, thank you "very" much! and saw for the first time this light blue three-ring binder with photo of Hampton Beach on the cover, entitled: "Reference Manual for Selectmen, Assessors & Taxpayers" a/k/a/ "Understanding N.H. Property Taxes" and that I did get to read at Concord City Hall in the Assessor's Office on the 1st floor, and copy for 25-cents a page, several pages therefrom and as indicated below.

Thank you "very" much as yesterday's meeting was very informative of your 5-year revision for 2013 of this 2008 booklet that seems to be "collecting dust" as you said in too many towns, including Boscawen as noted by me, and for which it ought not to be as in the May 1, 2008 cover letter to the booklet of to "keep in an available location". And so NOT behind locked doors! but like out where the Annual Reports are available = accessible, or "at hand"'s length, of "Easily obtained" as by not having to ask for it verbally, but there within sight.

The duty* of the ASB being as spelled out in Chapter 11 of 15, and at page 11-2 to be exact of to send out these "Guidelines" defined as "A statement of general policy", with the word policy being: "A method or course of action adopted by a government, business organization, etc. designed to influence and determine decisions." Of by House Bill #1266
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/billtext.aspx?billnumber=HB1266.html in The House Municipal & County Gov't Committee http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H18 having passed the House, http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/HouseBillsinCommitteeDocket.aspx?lsr=2190&code=XH18 and http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/housebillsincommitteebillstatus.aspx?lsr=2190&code=XH18 of it now in The Senate Public & Municipal Affairs Committee http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/Senate/committees/committee_details.aspx?cc=S27 for to change this word guidelines back to standards, of the word standard defined as: ""An acknowledged measure of comparison for quantitative or qualitative value; criterion; norm."

Of thank you Tom Holmes for your "All Hail Oog!" on the three pages in the Foreward of this booklet, and Tax Scholar Arlo Wooley in Chapter 1 for the History of: "For any tax, the cost of AVOIDANCE must be GREATer than the cost of COMPLIANCE." (emphasis ADDed, as in that phrase of an "ex gratia payment") ) but that this saying ought NOT to apply for unlawful and/or illegal taxes, BUT only the lawful and legal taxes! Because I seek NOT to avoid = "To keep away from" or "shun" = "To avoid (a person, group, or thing) deliberately and consistently" as it pertains to that "person" word of the Tax Collector (aka The "Catch Poll" in the olden days) BUT that the Tax Collector send me an HONEST bill, of me NOT within the School District, as the definition of a school is "the student body", and that of a district is "A territorial division created for governmental or other purposes", and that a territory is "The area for which a PERSON is responsible" (emphasis ADDed for in personam v.s. in rem jurisdiction!) And so for me to avoid this "group" is my right of Freedom of Association, and dis-association, as is supposed to be a guarantee by the First Amendment to the United State Constitution, that you all have supposedly taken an RSA Ch. 92:2 oath to honor, or at least that of to whom you direct these Guidelines to those RSA Ch. 42:1 local officials. See also 84 of the N.H. Constitution.

So when you outline in Chapter 14 about Real Estate Taxes and on page 14-9 to be exact your listing of Sections 14.7, 8 + 9 of for the County, Municipal, and School slices of the property tax pie you are in-complete, as against our Article 14 of the N.H. Bill of Rights   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html   in that by RSA Ch. 76:4 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/V/76/76-4.htm " Taxes Includable in One Assessment. – The selectmen of towns, or assessors of cities, MAY include in one assessment the state, county, town or city, highway, schoolhouse, school or village district and school taxes, or so many of them as may be found convenient." ((emphasis ADDed.) BUT that when I as the property owner and tax payer either AFTER the fact of the property tax bill by way of an Abatement or BEFORE the fact of stating ahead of time to bill me next for to include the breakdown in like a "Bill of Particulars", then my Article 32 "instruction" ought to be obeyed with this Article 8 "account"ing of to count the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7  items toward the total or summary, as an outline is a "general...summary" and so your page 14-9 is in-complete.  There being no guideline or statement of general policy that I can read anywhere where you have put to writing that of the method or course of action is to adopt this "may" consolidation as allowed by the statute.  Of which I do NOT allow, as in my claim for this Bill of Particulars.

Thus with such a Bill of Particulars, when billed for ALL seven categories, an EASY Abatement or deduction can be made therefrom to exclude the (1) state, (6) school district and (7) school taxes, since: (1) the state governor by his Article 41 duty to Art. 51 execute   http://www.nh.gov/constitution/governor.html   BOTH the laws of this state AND the United States has FAILED to see that the property taxes for the Federal buildings be paid, as only that of the land is exempt by RSA Ch. 123:2 http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-IX-123.htm and so any attempt at trying to extract up to what can be like the $2.2 million per year property tax for their complex of buildings on Pleasant Street in Concord from me is both unlawful and illegal for which I refuse to pay UNTIL the state complies with the law of that law and also that of RSA Ch. 7:6  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/I/7/7-6.htm within my Petition #22  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2012/PET0022.html of within the House Redress of Grievance Committee http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/committeedetails.aspx?code=H45  of see in detail for #22 =   http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/HouseBillsInCommittee.aspx?code=H45   "Next/Last Hearing:  REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES on 3/13/2012 10:15 AM at LOB 303" over to:  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/HouseBillsinCommitteeDocket.aspx?lsr=2629&code=H45   and  http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/house/committees/housebillsincommitteebillstatus.aspx?lsr=2629&code=H45  of I refuse to pay for public servants who do act OUTside the bounds of their authority to my detriment! The (6) school district, as already explained, plus that of (7) the state-wide property tax already declared un- constitutional by the N.H. Supreme Court. Thus per item (1) to correct what was written back in 2008 in Chapter 10 about Exemptions and Credits, in Section 10.6 on page 10-23 in that the statement in A.1. of: "Property owned by the Federal Government pays no property tax under any circumstances." is wrong!

Of to please reply to this "prompt"ly of your intent to correct these errors toward your next full meeting of the A.S.B. on Friday, March 23rd, and having a first draft in August toward your Annual Public Hearing alongside the L.G.C./ Local Government Center conference at The Inn in Manchester on Elm Street in September, as I'd like to have this in writing from you for to present to The Board of Selectmen at a Special Meeting sometime in the afternoon if possible this Monday, February 27th, as our Report of Meeting to try to resolve this denial of Abatement Application has got to be into the B.T.L.A./ Board of Tax & Land Appeals   http://www.nh.gov/btla/   by Tuesday, February 28th @ 4:30 o'clock p.m. cc: of a courtesy copy to: Anne M. Stelmach, Clerk, State Office Park South, 107 Pleasant Street, The Johnson Building, Concord, N.H. 03301, Telephone (603) 271-2578.

Noting the 1-page letter reply, thank you, from Attorney Daniel of DRA on January 10th, 2012, wherein paragraph #3 of 4 she did write that: "Please be advised that the Assessing Standards Board, as established under RSA 21-J:14-a is a self-governing board pursuant to RSA 21-G:10, although administratively attached to the Department of Revenue Administration under RSA 21-J:1-a. " and so what? Any complaints against not making a complete set of Guidelines available might be better directed NOT to the Legislature as in the Legislative  Ethics Committee, BUT to the Executive Branch Ethics Committee? Of hopefully not to be the case as for an Article 14 "prompt" correction to this, of if not by this Monday afternoon, then at least for when I have my hearing before the B.T.L.A. sometime this fall. Please.

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph S. Haas, P.O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone), e-mail: JosephSHaas at hotmail dot com

[JosephSHaas]

From: Me
To: *
Subject: FW: Update to: The "Reference Manual for Selectmen, Appraisers and Taxpayers" (of 2008)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:10:30 -0500

* Jose & Donna, plus: Bill, Keith and David:

Here's a relay of my e-mail that I did just send to the Assessing Standards Board (ASB) of the N.H. Dept. of Revenue Administration (DRA) of those creeps who sided with the I.R.S./Treasury Agents on Ed's case in Federal Court for a kick-back of the business-profits taxes that they of these state officers could have TRIED to collect from Elaine in County Court, but knowing that she knew of the Vivien Kellems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivien_Kellems defense of that divide and conquer strategy they chose to be wimps.  The state officials also too lazy and corrupt of hoping for $x from $y but them NEVER to get because a Federal "District" as defined as territorial, of from the word territory meaning of for in person jurisdiction only, and not in-rem, will NEVER collect ANYthing from ANY Tax o rU.S. Marshal sale of the so-called property, that they claim they "Own" because what they can sell but don't tell people is only a QuitClaim Deed of NOT their property BUT only that of whatever rights, if any or privileges they THINK that they have, but don't, other than more bull shit tactics to try to get some third party sucker as a "manceptor" actually who takes the instrument sold in his hands under a "Sale With All Faults" for better or WORSE!  for them! Of the property still in the seizure phase of that it will be NEVER forfeited over to the Feds.  The Feds in this state are creeps deserving to be brought to their knees of asking for our apologies AFTER they release our P.O.W.s.  Of this preamble to Ed & Elaine plus Danny and Reno BEFORE the what will probably be 2-page e-mail of that they can skim over and maybe pay particular attention to the paragraphs beginning with the words: "Thus with" for the continuation of my attempt at to get them taxed for their building as only the Federal land is exempt by RSA Ch. 123:2, and the "Of thank you Tom Holmes" paragraph dealing with this district/ territorial word as it applies to the local town or city school "district" that makes up the lion's share of that slice of the property tax pie. -- Joe

. . . .

[JosephSHaas]

Page 666 plus down to 551!?

Who erased what?

[Kat Kanning]

Nothing has been erased.  I'm slowly splitting up this thread into parts.  My ISP is wanting to shut me down because this forum is using inordinate amounts of server resources.  One of the possible problems is huge threads, so I'm splitting this one up, among other things.