• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Newt Gingrich spoke in NH

Started by planetaryjim, February 17, 2007, 08:13 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

planetaryjim

He lied to the American people in 1994, and broke the contract with America less than a year later.  Having shut down the government, he was the one afraid of the silence.

Newt Gingrich, speaking in New Hampshire, has announced that he is leading the charge for totalitarian control over every life of every American.  He wants you to be a slave, and to shut up.


QuoteNEWT GINGRICH: The third thing I want to talk about very briefly is the genuine danger of terrorism, in particular terrorists using weapons of mass destruction and weapons of mass murder, nuclear and biological weapons. And I want to suggest to you that right now we should be impaneling people to look seriously at a level of supervision that we would never dream of if it weren't for the scale of threat.

Let me give you two examples. When the British this summer arrested people who were planning to blow up ten airliners in one day, they arrested a couple who were going to use their six month old baby in order to hide the bomb as baby milk.

Now, if I come to you tonight and say that there are people on the planet who hate you, and they are 15-25 year old males who are willing to die as long as they get to kill you, I've simply described the warrior culture which has been true historically for 6 or 7 thousand years.

But, if I come to you and say that there is a couple that hates you so much that they will kill their six month old baby in order to kill you, I am describing a level of ferocity, and a level of savagery beyond anything we have tried to deal with.

And, what is truly frightening about the British experience is they are arresting British citizens, born in Britain, speaking English, who went to British schools, live in British housing, and have good jobs.

This is a serious long term war, and it will inevitably lead us to want to know what is said in every suspect place in the country, that will lead us to learn how to close down every website that is dangerous, and it will lead us to a very severe approach to people who advocate the killing of Americans and advocate the use of nuclear or biological weapons.

And, my prediction to you is that either before we lose a city, or if we are truly stupid, after we lose a city, we will adopt rules of  engagement that use every technology we can find to break up their capacity to use the Internet, to break up their capacity to use free speech, and to go after people who want to kill us to stop them from recruiting people before they get to reach out and convince young people to destroy their lives while destroying us.

This is a serious problem that will lead to a serious debate about the first amendment, but I think that the national security threat of losing an American city to a nuclear weapon, or losing several million Americans to a biological attack is so real that we need to proactively, now, develop the appropriate rules of engagement.

And, I further think that we should propose a Geneva convention for fighting terrorism which makes very clear that those who would fight outside the rules of law, those who would use weapons of mass destruction, and those who would target civilians are in fact subject to a totally different set of rules that allow us to protect civilization by defeating barbarism before it gains so much strength that it is truly horrendous.

This is a sober topic, but I think it is a topic we need a national dialogue about, and we need to get ahead of the curve rather than wait until actually we literary lose a city which could literally happen within the next decade if we are unfortunate. So ..

(APPLAUSE)

We are told that the British empire, which has long sought to place every person on this planet into a condition of slavery with the possible exception of the reigning monarch, had some evidence of some planes to be hijacked.  And when have the British failed to lie?  They collaborated with Bush on the lies about Iraq.  It was the British who first used bombers against German cities in WW2. Churchill lied about the Lusitania and the prospects at Gallipoli.    The British lied about the American colonists in 1775.  Go back further, the Brit Sir Jeffrey Amherst is the one who came up with passing out smallpox blankets to Native Americans to commit genocide.

So, now, a liar, Newt Gingrich, says that the British, well known liars, had evidence of some couple planning to use their child as a disguise for terror attax.  And, thus, Americans ought to give up all their liberties and forget the mangled bodies of our countrymen and trust the government.

I could vomit a lot.

And, no, I didn't see his second example.

News article about his speech:  http://www.americandaily.com/article/17431  I'm sure a full transcript should turn up sometime.


Quantrill

I've distrusted the British government since the days of King George.

;)

Russell Kanning

There is danger of future terrorist attacks

Our enemy...
lies
has wmd's and has used them
has killed civilians in terror attacks
has destroyed a major american city

There are fat old men, sitting in leather chairs in DC, plotting our enslavement. They might use baby bottles, the water supply, vaccines, and the education system.

We have to determine the proper rules for engagement with this enemy that can ensure we retain our civil rights as well as our enemy.

The means are the end.

Do unto others as you would have them do to you.

Love your enemy as yourself.

In my humble opinion, non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good.

planetaryjim

Dear Russell,

All good comments.  I would only take exception to this usage:


Quote from: Russell Kanning on February 18, 2007, 01:56 PM NHFTWe have to determine the proper rules for engagement with this enemy that can ensure we retain our civil rights as well as our enemy.

I do not have to determine proper rules of engagement for you.  You don't have to do so for me.  Each of us is free and sovereign.

As with Ed Brown.  I would urge him not to hold a post.  There is no fixed position that can be defended against what you have so clearly identified in the arsenal of those who seek to enslave us.  But, Ed has determined to engage on his ground, not wandering around the countryside.  It is his life, and his choice to take.  I can no more determine the proper rules of engagement for him than I can teach him rules of propriety. 

But, other than that tiny caveat, what you have written rocks.

Regards,

Jim

Russell Kanning

I was joking, by using Newts words. :)

AlexLibman

Alex Jones quote of the day (17 minutes into July 26th podcast w/o ads), slightly edited for readability:

"Newt Gingrich is about as conservative as a wild drunkard drag queen running around with his hair on fire!"

:lol:

planetaryjim

Quote from: AlexLibman on July 26, 2007, 10:15 PM NHFT
"Newt Gingrich is about as conservative as a wild drunkard drag queen running around with his hair on fire!"

Sounds like a good description of Rudy Giuliani, too.

KBCraig

Quote from: sjhipple on September 13, 2007, 01:25 PM NHFT
I know I'll get smitten for this but...

Call me crazy...I have alot of respect for Newt Gingrich.  1995 is the only year in my entire lifetime that the federal gov't actually got smaller.  And he didn't break the Contract With America as someone suggested above.  The Contract was that if Republicans were elected, they would bring up each of the things mentioned in the Contract and bring them to a floor vote.  This they did...they successfully passed quite a few of them as well.  For all of Newt's fault, and he has many, he was successful in getting a major reduction in the welfare state.  If only his party would've stayed on that path...

I agree. The trouble started in '96 when they had to get re-elected.

CNHT

#8
Quote from: sjhipple on September 13, 2007, 01:25 PM NHFT
I know I'll get smitten for this but...

Call me crazy...I have alot of respect for Newt Gingrich.  1995 is the only year in my entire lifetime that the federal gov't actually got smaller.  And he didn't break the Contract With America as someone suggested above.  The Contract was that if Republicans were elected, they would bring up each of the things mentioned in the Contract and bring them to a floor vote.  This they did...they successfully passed quite a few of them as well.  For all of Newt's fault, and he has many, he was successful in getting a major reduction in the welfare state.  If only his party would've stayed on that path...


Too bad he's a follower of Heidi and Alvin Toffler, futurists who promote the 1984 agenda.

http://www.toffler.com/whatwedo/mission.shtml

Newtie is about the NWO, through and through.

CNHT

Quote from: sjhipple on September 13, 2007, 01:25 PM NHFT
I know I'll get smitten for this but...

Call me crazy...I have alot of respect for Newt Gingrich.  1995 is the only year in my entire lifetime that the federal gov't actually got smaller.  And he didn't break the Contract With America as someone suggested above.  The Contract was that if Republicans were elected, they would bring up each of the things mentioned in the Contract and bring them to a floor vote.  This they did...they successfully passed quite a few of them as well.  For all of Newt's fault, and he has many, he was successful in getting a major reduction in the welfare state.  If only his party would've stayed on that path...

You're right SJ but the problem is, it was just a diversion.

David

Newt ia an authoritarian not much better than rudy, he loves to be on shawn hannity's show and tell everyone how we should kill iraqis because they are going to molest our infants ect.  (kidding about the last part)  I will admit, shutting down the gov't is my all time favorite political stunt, I wish someone would do it again.   ;D