• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

Union Leader on NHLF

Started by KBCraig, February 24, 2007, 11:49 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

CNHT

#30
Maybe they agree on 10%. Or less if you consider this:

The Real ID opposition is of no consequence when they turn around and support universal health care such as Porter, Hillary, Obama and Edwards are pushing!

And just look at all the civil liberties these folks are destroying in the NH legislature as we speak!

NH will never be the same. I will never use the excuse of Real ID or anti-war to hook up with and empower socialist totalitarians.


Seatbelt law: HB 802 How DARE they?
Monday, February 26th, 2007
HOUSE BILL 802
AN ACT relative to passenger restraints.

SPONSORS:
Rep. Jennifer Brown, Straf 5 (26.85%) - D rating
Rep. McLeod, Graf 2 (29.63%) - D rating
Rep. Bouchard, Merr 11 (33.33%) - D rating
Rep. Hager, Merr 12 (19.44%) - F rating
Rep. Pilliod, Belk 5 (30.56%) - D rating
Sen. Hassan, Dist 23 (38.0%) - D+ rating
Sen. Fuller Clark, Dist 24 (33.0%) - D rating

Above are the sponsors of this law which would require the wearing of seatbelts for passenger vehicles. Notice that they have all received D?s or F?s on the liberty index for their lack of respect for individual rights? The Democrats who are in control are now out of control and trying to turn NH into Massachusetts or worse yet, North Korea. What is next? Helmet laws, smoking bans, trans fat bans, and now seatbelt laws must be made for adults, while children get to have abortions no matter how old they are? These folks don?t make sense and should be hearing from everyone telling them so.

All good and free citizens will REFUSE to abide by these unconstitutional and unenforcable laws, you can count on that.

error

Quote from: Rosie the Riveter on February 27, 2007, 11:56 AM NHFT
Yes and at least they have some issues and care enough to work on them -- rather than watch TV sitcoms everynight and follow news like Brittney Spears new haircut.

Build bridges, my friends, rather than tear them down.

Build bridges but guard them well. These people do not necessarily share our principles, and unless they do, any alliance will be uneasy at best, destructive at worst.

CNHT

Quote from: error on February 27, 2007, 08:27 PM NHFT
Quote from: Rosie the Riveter on February 27, 2007, 11:56 AM NHFT
Yes and at least they have some issues and care enough to work on them -- rather than watch TV sitcoms everynight and follow news like Brittney Spears new haircut.

Build bridges, my friends, rather than tear them down.

Build bridges but guard them well. These people do not necessarily share our principles, and unless they do, any alliance will be uneasy at best, destructive at worst.

Even Ron answered the question as to why he won't hook up with a lot of these anti-war groups. He can oppose the war for his own reasons as an individual. He doesn't like the main part of their OTHER agenda. And I don't blame him. This is why he's the only anti-war candidate I can support. He does it for the right reasons and has not let him be coopted by these groups.


ny2nh

Quote from: Jon Maltz on February 26, 2007, 07:08 AM NHFT
DFNH is focused on clean elections.  I support their efforts in what I've seem them propose for that.  They hate electronic voting machines, and darned if I don't too.

Electronic voting machines - meaning one like we use in Manchester that read the paper ballots - or electronic voting machines that people actually vote on where there is no paper trail? The ballots/machines we use in Manchester are so easy and the results are reliable (as shown by recounts of paper ballots where the change in outcome is actually human error in the recount, not machine error in the first place).

As far as DFNH - part of their effors is the Granite State Fair Tax Coalition, a group that wants to stop the anti-tax pledge and people to consider other forms of funding that are "equitable and sitainable". Translation: they support a broad based tax - i.e income or sales tax. How about stop spending the money????

CNHT

Quote from: ny2nh on February 28, 2007, 06:37 AM NHFT
Quote from: Jon Maltz on February 26, 2007, 07:08 AM NHFT
DFNH is focused on clean elections.  I support their efforts in what I've seem them propose for that.  They hate electronic voting machines, and darned if I don't too.

Electronic voting machines - meaning one like we use in Manchester that read the paper ballots - or electronic voting machines that people actually vote on where there is no paper trail? The ballots/machines we use in Manchester are so easy and the results are reliable (as shown by recounts of paper ballots where the change in outcome is actually human error in the recount, not machine error in the first place).

As far as DFNH - part of their effors is the Granite State Fair Tax Coalition, a group that wants to stop the anti-tax pledge and people to consider other forms of funding that are "equitable and sitainable". Translation: they support a broad based tax - i.e income or sales tax. How about stop spending the money????

She's right folks. I witnessed a recount and the machines worked perfectly. However, there were lots of 'non-residents' voting and no one wanted to stop them, least of all the DFNH crowd.