• Welcome to New Hampshire Underground.
 

News:

Please log in on the special "login" page, not on any of these normal pages. Thank you, The Procrastinating Management

"Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes."  --Alexander Haig

Main Menu

How do we find lists of homes to be seized?

Started by Dave Ridley, May 15, 2007, 05:01 PM NHFT

Previous topic - Next topic

Dave Ridley


Dreepa

Quote from: DadaOrwell on May 15, 2007, 05:01 PM NHFT
...for failure to pay the property taxes?
That should be pretty easy.

Go to the local taxcollector's office and ask to see the list of properties that are behind.
I believe that they have to be behind 3 years to have proceedings start. Then the selectmen must vote to start the process.
I think that the taking of houses is rare.. but they do put liens on houses.



Kat Kanning

Sounds like they take quite a few in Winchester.

Dave Ridley

actually i meant both homes and businesses

there are almost twenty properties up for seizure in berlin are t hey all businesses?

Libertariangoddess

Here they auction them off for back taxes owed, on the courthouse front steps.

KBCraig

Quote from: DadaOrwell on May 16, 2007, 04:01 PM NHFT
actually i meant both homes and businesses

there are almost twenty properties up for seizure in berlin are t hey all businesses?

A lot of them are vacant multi-tenant houses.

Another one burned down over the weekend.

Bald Eagle


From  http://www.barefootsworld.net/sui_juris/hiding_behind_bar.html#atty

Feudal Tenancy

If you think you are a landowner in America, take a close look at the warranty deed or fee title to your land. You will almost always find the words "tenant" or "tenancy." The title or deed document establishing your right as a tenant, not that of a landowner, has been prepared for transfer by a licensed BAR Attorney, just as it was carried out within the original English feudal system we presumed we had escaped from in 1776.

A human being is the tenant to a feudal superior. A feudal tenant is a legal person who pays rent or services of some sort for the use and occupation of another's land. The land has been conveyed to the tenant's use, but the actual ownership remains with the superior. If a common person does not own what he thought was his land (he's legally defined as a "feudal tenant", not the superior owner), then a superior person owns the land and the feudal tenant - person pays him to occupy the land.

This is the hidden Feudal Law in America. When a person (a.k.a. human being, corporation, natural person, partnership, association, organization, etc.) pays taxes to the tax assessor of the civil county or city government (also a person), it is a payment to the superior land owner for the right to be a tenant and to occupy the land belonging to the superior. If this were not so, then how could a local government sell the house and land of a person for not rendering his services (taxes)?

We used to think that there was no possible way feudal law could be exercised in America, but the facts have proven otherwise. It's no wonder they hid the definition of a human being behind the definition of a man.  The next time you enter into an agreement or contract with another person (legal entity), look for the keywords person, individual, and natural person describing who you are.

Are you the entity the other person claims you are? When you "appear" before their jurisdiction and courts, you have agreed that you are a legal person unless you show them otherwise. You will have to deny that you are the person and state who you really are. Is the flesh and blood standing there in that courtroom a person by their legal definition?

See PERSON for your role in the BAR Attorney system as a Feudal Tenant.

d_goddard

It's not over property taxes, but it might be even better.
It's for a road that essentially will be only used by a private hospital and a gov't-monopoly school.
The elderly couple lived in the neighborhood their whole lives and don't want to sell.
http://newhampshireunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=8685.0

Dreepa

Quote from: d_goddard on May 19, 2007, 01:02 PM NHFT
It's not over property taxes, but it might be even better.
It's for a road that essentially will be only used by a private hospital and a gov't-monopoly school.


Also a private school... St Paul's is really keen on this road.

d_goddard

Quote from: Dreepa on May 20, 2007, 09:45 AM NHFT
Quote from: d_goddard on May 19, 2007, 01:02 PM NHFT
It's not over property taxes, but it might be even better.
It's for a road that essentially will be only used by a private hospital and a gov't-monopoly school.
Also a private school... St Paul's is really keen on this road.
Interesting... this could be challenged on constitutional grounds, maybe not legally, but at least on appear to public sentiment... it is taking of land for what is really private usage, even if the road is "public"

Dave Ridley

called the tuttles today; no answer or machine