Open carry and refusal to produce ID

[Eli]

[Second, you could simply tell the officer that you are recording the interaction.  Once you tell him that, he clearly will not be justified in expecting his communication to be not subject to interception.  Even if he can claim such an expectation, once he knows you're recording you can argue that his continued interaction constituted consent to the interception.  I'm not sure how this would play out in court, but it seems like another fun project for someone with the constitution for extended litigation.

II. Oral communication'' means any oral communication uttered by a person exhibiting an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation.

Reading the above it doesn't seem that consent is necessary, just notice.  Further, how anyone could believe a confrontation on the sidewalk is not subject to interception is beyond me.  Also, as porcs become more prevalent in NH it seems that LEO should be on notice that their actions are all, will always be, "subject to interception."

[mackler]

...Or the people who know the checkpoint is there and drive right through during the majority of time when it is closed.

http://stopthecheckpoint.com/
Radio news report:
http://www.nhpr.org/audio/audio/nht-2005-01-04-sz1.wax
Good in depth article:
http://www.counterpunch.org/matson01212006.html
VT Joint resolution in opposition to the establishment of a permanent border patrol checkpoint on Interstate 91 south of White River Junction:
http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/legdoc.cfm?URL=/docs/2008/resolutn/JRH005.HTM

We should pick a day and get like 100 cars to go through the checkpoint and give them a hard time (legally of course).